arxiv:math/ v1 [math.nt] 17 Apr 2006

Transcription

1 THE CARMICHAEL NUMBERS UP TO arxiv:math/ v1 [math.nt] 17 Apr 2006 RICHARD G.E. PINCH Abstract. We extend our previous computations to show that there are Carmichael numbers up to As before, the numbers were generated by a back-tracking search for possible prime factorisations together with a large prime variation. We present further statistics on the distribution of Carmichael numbers. 1. Introduction A Carmichael number N is a composite number N with the property that for every b prime to N we have b N 1 1 mod N. It follows that a Carmichael number N must be square-free, with at least three prime factors, and that p 1 N 1 for every prime p dividing N: conversely, any such N must be a Carmichael number. For background on Carmichael numbers and details of previous computations we refer to our previous paper [4]: in that paper we described the computation of the Carmichael numbers up to and presented some statistics. These computations have since been extended to [5], [6] and now to 10 18, using similar techniques, and we present further statistics. The complete list of Carmichael numbers up to is available from the author s web site at 2. Organisation of the search We used improved versions of strategies first described in [4]. The principal search was a depth-first back-tracking search over possible sequences of primes factors p 1,..., p d. Put P r = r i=1 p i, Q r = d i=r+1 p i and L r = lcm {p i 1 : i = 1,...,r}. We find that Q r must satisfy the congruence N = P r Q r 1 mod L r and so in particular Q d = p d must satisfy a congruence modulo L d 1 : further p d 1 must be a factor of P d 1 1. We modified this to terminate the search early at some level r if the modulus L r is large enough to limit the possible values of Q r, which may then be factorised directly. We also employed the variant based on proposition 2 of [4] which determines the finitely many possible pairs (p d 1, p d ) from P d 2. In practice this was useful only when d = 3 allowing us to determine the complete list of Carmichael numbers with three prime factors up to The count of these is (not as incorrectly reported in our preliminary work). Finally we employed a different search over large values of p d, in the range 10 7 < p d < 10 9, using the property that P d 1 1 mod (p d 1) and factorising the numbers in this arithmetic progression less than /p d. 3. Statistics We have shown that there are Carmichael numbers up to 10 18, all with at most 11 prime factors. We let C(X) denote the number of Carmichael numbers less than X and C(d, X) denote the number with exactly d prime factors. Table 1 gives the values of C(X) and Table 2 the values of C(d, X) for X in powers of 10 up to Date: 17 April

2 2 RICHARD G.E. PINCH n C (10 n ) Table 1. Distribution of Carmichael numbers up to X total Table 2. Values of C(X) and C(d, X) for d 10 and X in powers of 10 up to We have used the same methods to calculate the smallest Carmichael number S d with d prime factors for d up to 35. The results are given in Table 3. Heuristics suggest that a good approximation for log S d might be 2 log 2(d 1)log(d 1). There is some support for this from Table 4. In Table 5 and Figure 1 we tabulate the function k(x), defined by Pomerance, Selfridge and Wagstaff [7] by C(X) = X exp ( k(x) ) logx log log log X. log log X They proved that liminf k 1 and suggested that limsupk might be 2, although they also observed that within the range of their tables k(x) is decreasing: Pomerance [8],[9] gave a heuristic argument suggesting that lim k = 1. The decrease in k

3 THE CARMICHAEL NUMBERS UP TO d N Table 3. The smallest Carmichael numbers with d prime factors for d up to 35. is reversed between and : see Figure 1. We find no clear support from our computations for any conjecture on a limiting value of k. In Table 5 we also give the ratios C(10 n )/C ( 10 n 1) investigated by Swift [11]. Swift s ratio, again initially decreasing, also increases again before In Table 6 and Figure 2 we see that within the range of our computations C(X) is a slowly growing power of X: about X 0.34 for X around In Table 7 we give the number of Carmichael numbers in each class modulo m for m = 5, 7, 11 and 12. In Tables 8 and 9 we give the number of Carmichael numbers divisible by primes p up to 97. In Table 8 we count all Carmichael numbers divisible by p: in Table 9 we count only those for which p is the smallest prime factor. The largest prime factor of a Carmichael number up to is p = , dividing n = = We have p = n : indeed n = p(2p 1) and n 1 = (p 1)(2p + 1).

4 4 RICHARD G.E. PINCH log(s d ) 2 log 2(d 1) log(d 1) d Table 4. The smallest Carmichael number with d prime factors S d compared to 2 log 2(d 1)log(d 1). The largest prime to occur as the smallest prime factor of a Carmichael number in this range is , dividing = We note that this number is of the form (220k+1)(221k+1)(249k+1) with k = We define the index of a Carmichael number N to be the integer i(n) = (N 1)/λ(N) where λ is the Carmichael function, the exponent of the multiplicative group. A result of Somer [10] implies that i(n) as N runs through Carmichael numbers. In Table 10 we list the Carmichael numbers known to have index less than 100: the list is complete for numbers up to We define the Lehmer index of a number N to be l(n) = (N 1)/φ(N). Lehmer s totient problem asks whether there is a number of integral Lehmer index greater than 1 (that is, whether there is a composite N such that φ(n) divides N 1). Such a number would have to be a Carmichael number. See Guy [2] B37 for further details.

5 THE CARMICHAEL NUMBERS UP TO k X Figure 1. k(x) versus X (expressed in powers of 10). n k (10 n ) C(10 n )/C ( 10 n 1) Table 5. The function k(x) and growth of C(X) for X = 10 n, n 18. The Carmichael numbers up to with Lehmer index 2 are listed in Table 11.

6 6 RICHARD G.E. PINCH n log C (10 n ) /(n log10) Table 6. C(X) as a power of X. m c Table 7. The number of Carmichael numbers in each class modulo m for m = 5, 7, 11 and 12.

7 THE CARMICHAEL NUMBERS UP TO log(c)/log(x) X Figure 2. C(X) as a power of X (expressed in powers of 10). p Table 8. Primes occurring in Carmichael numbers.

8 8 RICHARD G.E. PINCH p Table 9. Primes occurring as least prime factor in Carmichael numbers.

9 THE CARMICHAEL NUMBERS UP TO i N factors Table 10. Carmichael numbers with small index

10 10 RICHARD G.E. PINCH l N factors Table 11. Carmichael numbers with Lehmer index greater than 2

11 THE CARMICHAEL NUMBERS UP TO References [1] Jean-Marie De Koninck and Claude Levesque (eds.), Number theory: proceedings of the international number theory conference, Université de Laval, 1987, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, [2] Richard K. Guy, Unsolved problems in number theory, second ed., Unsolved problems in intuitive mathematics, vol. 1, Springer Verlag, New York, [3] R.A. Mollin (ed.), Number theory and its applications, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 1989, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Number Theory and Applications. [4] Richard G.E. Pinch, The Carmichael numbers up to 10 15, Math. Comp. 61 (1993), , Lehmer memorial issue. [5], The Carmichael numbers up to 10 16, March 1998, arxiv:math.nt/ [6], The Carmichael numbers up to 10 17, April 2005, arxiv:math.nt/ [7] C. Pomerance, J.L. Selfridge, and S.S. Wagstaff jr, The pseudoprimes up to , Math. Comp. 35 (1980), no. 151, [8] Carl Pomerance, On the distribution of pseudoprimes, Math. Comp. 37 (1981), [9], Two methods in elementary analytic number theory, in Mollin [3], Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Number Theory and Applications, pp [10] Lawrence Somer, On Fermat d-pseudoprimes, in De Koninck and Levesque [1], pp [11] J.D. Swift, Review 13[9] table of Carmichael numbers to 10 9, Math. Comp. 29 (1975), Eldon Road, Cheltenham, Glos GL52 6TU, U.K. address: rgep@chalcedon.demon.co.uk