Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. A New Structure for the NLC Positron Predamping Ring Lattice
|
|
- Janis Underwood
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes LCC-0066 CBP Tech Note June 2001 A New Structure for the NLC Positron Predamping Ring Lattice A. Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA Abstract: The NLC positron source is specified to produce a beam of normalized edge emittance 30,000 mm-mrad. It is not practicable, using a single damping ring, to damp this emittance to meet the specification for injection into the main linac, so a pre-damping ring is used to reduce the emittance to a value at least as small as that of the electron beam from the source. In this note, we describe the design of a pre-damping ring based on a double-bend achromatic structure, as opposed to the previously investigated theoretical minimum emittance cell. The lattice meets the specifications for damping and has close to the required acceptance, and has advantages over previous lattices, in terms of component specifications and design fleibility.
2 A New Structure for the NLC Positron Pre-Damping Ring Lattice Andrzej Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory June 21 st, 2001 CBP Tech Note-233 LCC-0066 Abstract The NLC positron source is specified to produce a beam of normalized edge emittance 30,000 mm-mrad. It is not practicable, using a single damping ring, to damp this emittance to meet the specification for injection into the main linac, so a pre-damping ring is used to reduce the emittance to a value at least as small as that of the electron beam from the source. In this note, we describe the design of a pre-damping ring based on a double-bend achromat structure, as opposed to the previously investigated theoretical minimum emittance cell. The lattice meets the specifications for damping and has close to the required acceptance, and has advantages over previous lattices, in terms of component specifications and design fleibility. 1 Introduction The injector comple for the NLC uses identical main damping rings for each beam, that are specified to reduce the normalized emittance from 150 mm-mrad horizontally and vertically, to below 3 mm-mrad horizontally and 0.02 mm-mrad vertically. With a repetition rate of 120 Hz, this damping can be achieved using a single ring for each beam. Recent design work leading to a suitable lattice for the main damping rings is described in reference 1. To achieve the very low emittance and required damping rate, the lattice uses strong focusing magnets, and a high field (2.15 T) wiggler with a length of approimately 46 m. The narrow aperture of these magnets limits the acceptance of the ring. The positron source is specified to produce a beam with edge emittance 30,000 mm-mrad. It is not practicable to damp such a large emittance to the values required for injection into the main linac in a single ring. Furthermore, the main damping rings will not have the transverse acceptance required for a beam with such a large emittance. The positron source parameters and the main damping ring specifications lead to the need for a pre-damping ring, that will reduce the emittance from 30,000 mm-mrad, to below 150 mm-mrad for injection into the main damping ring. One significant difference between the pre-damping ring and the main damping rings is that the emittance specification on the pre-damping ring is much more relaed. Rapid damping is still required, but an equilibrium emittance of around 100 mm-mrad or less will be sufficient. Also, it is not necessary to produce a flat beam, so the alignment tolerances and coupling correction will be much looser than in the main rings. However, the pre-damping ring will require a relatively large acceptance, which will impact the design of the lattice and its magnetic elements.
3 Previous work on the pre-damping ring lattice has based the design on a racetrack structure 2,3. The ZDR design, for eample, used 15 FOBO cells in each arc, to achieve an equilibrium emittance of 77 mm-mrad. The densely packed lattice had a circumference of 171 m. All the damping was provided by the main arc dipoles, which needed a field of 1.8 T to meet the damping specification. We have recently considered a design using TME cells instead of FOBO cells in the arcs, and which is therefore similar to the main damping rings. Although the number of cells required to reach the emittance is significantly reduced compared to the FOBO lattice, we have found that the TME lattice presents particular problems: Optimizing the dynamic aperture to achieve the specified acceptance is difficult, since the lattice has low symmetry, and the available nonlinear elements are used to correct the chromaticity. Improving the dynamic aperture requires significant detuning of the cell from the TME condition, to raise the dispersion at the chromatic setupoles and reduce the natural chromaticity, thus reducing the strengths of the setupoles. The large dispersion leads to a large momentum compaction, and hence a large RF voltage is needed to provide sufficient momentum acceptance. Our most recent lattice required a voltage of 3.4 MV, and seven RF cavities. Packing a number of systems into a single straight (including injection, RF, damping wiggler, and circumference correction chicane) severely affects the tuning fleibility, and makes it difficult to limit the beta functions to the low values needed to improve the acceptance. Adjustment of the circumference correction chicanes, for eample, becomes problematic. Limited available space for the damping wiggler leads to a high peak field requirement, of the order 1.2 T. This is difficult to achieve while maintaining a large aperture. The design presented in this note avoids the above problems associated with the TME lattice, by adopting a 10-fold symmetric double-bend achromat (DBA) structure. The DBA lattice is able to reach sufficiently low emittance with fewer components compared to the FOBO lattice. It provides space for harmonic setupoles to allow optimization of the dynamic aperture, so the dispersion, and hence the momentum compaction and the RF voltage can be kept to low values compared with the TME lattice. Furthermore, the structure allows separation of the different components, so that the damping wiggler, injection/etraction systems, RF cavities and chicane are all placed in separate straights; this greatly assists lattice design, since the different cells can be optimized independently, and should also ease engineering constraints, for eample in locating photon stops to absorb the synchrotron radiation from the dipoles and wiggler. 2 Lattice Parameters and Structure Parameters driving the design of the pre-damping ring are shown in Table 1; these are essentially the repetition frequency, and the injected and etracted emittances. The minimum machine circumference is fied from the number of bunch trains stored, the number of bunches per train and the inter-bunch spacing, and the kicker rise/fall time. Lattice parameters are given in Table 2, and wiggler parameters in Table 3. 2
4 Table 1: Eternal parameters. Bunches per train bunch-to-bunch spacing a kicker rise/fall time N b 190 τ /ns 1.4 b τ /ns 100 collider repetition rate f /Hz 120 injected horizontal/vertical emittance (edge a ) γε inj /mm mrad 30,000 etracted horizontal emittance (rms) etracted vertical emittance (rms) a For a discussion of the edge emittance, see Section 6. k γε, et /mm mrad <150 γε /mm mrad <150 y, et Table 2: Principal lattice parameters. Energy E /GeV 1.98 Number of bunch trains stored N 2 Store time (horizontal, vertical) b N τ 3.00, 3.03 Circumference C /m Basic cell type DBA Basic cell length /m Number of cells 10 Dipole field B 0 /T Tunes (horizontal, vertical, synchrotron) Q, Q, Q , 5.388, Natural chromaticity (horizontal, vertical) train y s ξ, ξ , Normalized natural emittance γε 0 /mm mrad 59.7 Damping times τ, τ y, τ ε /ms 5.85, 5.81, 2.89 Assumed coupling κ 5 % Assumed injected emittance (rms) γε /mm mrad 21,000 Etracted emittance (horizontal, vertical) (rms) γε et /mm mrad 127.3, Ratio of vertical equilibrium to etracted emittance ε y 0 ε y, et Momentum compaction α RF voltage V /MV rf RF acceptance inj y ε rf 1.5 % RF frequency f rf /MHz 714 Harmonic number h 550 Equilibrium energy spread (rms) σ % Equilibrium bunch length (rms) σ z /mm 5.14 b The store time is the number of damping times for which each train is stored. δ 3
5 Table 3: Wiggler parameters Wiggler peak field Wiggler period Wiggler total length Bˆ w /T 1.4 λ /m 1.0 w L /m 49.5 Integrated wiggler field Bˆ 2 w ds /T 2 m Energy loss/turn, dipoles + wiggler Energy loss ratio w U 0 +U w /kev = 525 F w Note that we calculate the etracted emittance from an effective rms value for the injected beam emittance. We assume that the effective rms emittance is given by γε 0. 7 (see Section 6, equation (2)). rms γε edge The basic double-bend achromat structure of a single cell is shown in Figure 1. The dispersion is close to zero outside of the achromat; the wiggler generates the small residual dispersion. The achromat uses two quadrupole doublets, and three chromatic setupoles. The harmonic setupoles are located outside of the achromat. Use is made of the significant vertical focusing from the wiggler, to reduce the number of quadrupoles in the straight section: only three are required in the wiggler section. The beta functions are moderate, below 18 m horizontally and vertically throughout the cell. Figure 1 Lattice functions in one wiggler cell. Other types of cell are constructed for the RF cavities (Figure 2), chicane (Figure 3), and injection and etraction systems (Figure 4). Note that the structure and lattice functions in these different types of cell are very similar. The main difference when compared to the wiggler cell, is the use of a quadrupole doublet outside the achromat. The beta 4
6 functions are very slightly larger, but still below 20 m. The geometry of the lattice is simplified by having the cells the same length, and the spacing of the dipoles the same in each case; thus, the layout is a regular decagon. Figure 2 Lattice functions in the RF cell. Figure 3 Lattice functions in the chicane cell. 5
7 Figure 4 Lattice functions in the etraction cell. 2.1 RF Cell There is more than sufficient space for four RF cavities. The RF system requires that the distance between the centerlines of the cavities is a whole number plus three-quarters of an RF wavelength; adjacent cavities are separated by 3¾ wavelengths, and cavities on either side of the central quadrupole are separated by 9¾ wavelengths. It is assumed at present that the cavities will be the same design as used in the main damping rings 4, being HOM-damped structures based on the PEP-II design. Studies of instabilities driven by modes in the cavities have yet to be carried out for the pre-damping ring, though we note that in the case of the main damping rings, only a few modes transverse and longitudinally are above the damping threshold 5, and growth rates for these modes can readily be dealt with by feedback systems. 2.2 Chicanes The present design uses two separate chicanes, each being identical in design to that used in the main damping ring, and allowing adjustment of the circumference over ±2 mm. Thus, the total circumference adjustment range is ±4 mm. The use of the same system in the pre-damping ring as in the main damping ring in itself brings some benefits. The larger momentum compaction in the pre-damping ring (by a factor of seven) implies greater sensitivity to circumference changes through environmental effects, although with a smaller circumference, these effects should themselves be smaller. Thus, greater circumference variability is desirable in the pre-damping ring. Using two chicanes rather than one eases the technical requirements and minimizes the retuning required in the circumference adjustment; it also allows the symmetry of the cell to be maintained. 2.3 Injection/Etraction systems We have assumed the same design for the injection/etraction kickers and septa as given in the NLC ZDR 6 ; the kickers and septa are each 2 m long, the kickers providing a deflection of 8 mrad (injection) and 6.6 mrad (etraction), and the septa a deflection of 150 mrad. The central defocusing quadrupole provides additional bending for the 6
8 injected/etracted beam. The circumference of the lattice allows for a kicker rise/fall time of 119 ns. The geometry in the injection region is shown in Figure 5. With the present design, the kicked beam is 77.8 mm off-ais relative to the stored beam at the entrance to the septum. At the location of the net quadrupole following the last septum in the direction of the etracted beam, the kicked beam is 423 mm off-ais, with respect to the stored beam. The technical constraints so far look reasonable; the symmetry of the lattice, with injection and etraction on opposite sides of the ring, allow fleibility in increasing the length of these systems if necessary, at the cost of increasing the overall circumference. beam offset /m, divergence /rad offset divergence kicker quadrupole septum distance /m Figure 5 Injection geometry (beam travels from the right). 2.4 Overall Structure The overall structure of the pre-damping ring lattice is shown in Figure 6. The sequence of cells can be chosen for practical convenience: there are no fundamental lattice issues. Thus, the RF cell may be located anywhere from the injection to the etraction straight (following the direction of the beam), where the cavities will not be subject to any transient beam loading resulting from in injection/etraction cycle. Although the injection and etraction cells are shown diametrically opposite, to correspond more closely to the current overall configuration of the injector systems 7, this in itself is not a lattice requirement, and relative repositioning of these straights presents no lattice problems. 3 Dynamics and Acceptance 3.1 Chromatic Properties The achromat is designed to provide (between the dipoles) large horizontal dispersion and good separation of the horizontal and vertical beta functions, to allow correction of the chromaticity with moderate setupole strengths. Constraining the beta functions to low values throughout the lattice helps keep the natural chromaticity of the lattice low. Harmonic setupoles, placed in regions of zero dispersion, can be used to correct higher order chromaticity, as well as nonlinear betatron parameters. 7
9 40 Wiggler Chicane 30 Wiggler 20 Injection Wiggler -10 Wiggler Etraction -20 Wiggler -30 RF Wiggler Figure 6 Overall structure of the pre-damping ring. The scales are in metres. The beam circulates clockwise. Figure 7 shows the variation in tune with momentum up to ±2 % momentum deviation. We note that adjusting for slightly positive horizontal chromaticity can reduce the total variation in horizontal tune. The tune variation looks sufficiently small to allow reasonable dynamic momentum acceptance. We have not yet carried out an analysis of the harmonic setupoles tuning, and further optimization may be possible. The working point in tune space is shown in Figure 8. We are not concerned about the proimity to coupling resonances: low betatron coupling is not a performance requirement for the pre-damping ring, since the specification on etracted emittances places equal upper limits in the two transverse planes. 3.2 Dynamic Aperture To assist with injection efficiency, the dynamic aperture of the lattice is improved through the use of harmonic setupoles. The present specification of the lattice is for a transverse acceptance corresponding to an edge emittance of 45,000 mm-mrad (see Section 6); this is derived from the nominal injected beam edge emittance of 30,000 mmmrad, plus 50% to allow for mismatches and jitter. We note that a particle at the dynamic acceptance limit has a maimum offset from the design orbit given by: 8
10 ˆ 2βε +ηδ (1) = edge where is the dispersion, and is the momentum deviation. Figure 7 Tune shift with momentum up to ±2 % momentum deviation. Figure 8 Working point in tune space. The nominal working point is (11.465,5.388): the curved line shows variation in tunes up to ± 2% momentum deviation. Resonance lines up to fifth order are shown. 9
11 The specified energy acceptance is ±1.5%. This again includes a margin of 50% over the nominal beam properties (1% half-width energy spread) to allow for jitter. The equilibrium bunch length is 5.14 mm with an energy spread of % (see Table 1): thus, we epect that soon after injection, the bunch length is likely to filament to around 66 mm. With an RF wavelength of 420 mm, and rapid longitudinal damping, this is not anticipated to be a problem. (a) (b) Figure 9 (a) Horizontal and (b) vertical phase space portraits for on-momentum particles. Horizontal and vertical phase space portraits for on-momentum particles are shown in Figure 9. In the horizontal plane, the dynamics show small nonlinearities for amplitudes approaching 0.04 m On-momentum dp/p = -1.5% Required Acceptance y /m /m Figure 10 Dynamic apertures for particles with zero and 1.5% momentum deviation. 10
12 The dynamic apertures, for particles with zero and 1.5% momentum deviation, are shown in Figure 10. The dynamic aperture is calculated by tracking 200 turns, with the observation point at the center of an achromat, i.e. at the midpoint of the setupole correcting the horizontal chromaticity. At this location, the horizontal beta function has a value of 16.0 m, the vertical beta function is 6.0 m, and the horizontal dispersion is m. The required acceptance also shown in Figure 10 is calculated using these values in (1), with the edge acceptance 45,000 mm-mrad, and energy acceptance 1.5% half-width. The dynamic aperture appears to be beyond the required limit. We have not so far included multipole field errors in the magnets, although we do not epect this to affect the dynamic aperture to such an etent that the specified acceptance cannot be achieved. We have so far carried out only a preliminary optimization of the dynamic aperture. It is to be epected that with more work, optimizing the design of the individual cells, and the locations and strengths of the harmonic setupoles, the dynamic aperture may be improved. 3.3 Acceptance As we have already mentioned, the specified acceptance of the ring is for an edge emittance of 45,000 mm-mrad and half-width energy spread of 1.5%. To characterize the acceptance, it is necessary to track through the lattice including the effects of apertures; we have not so far performed these studies. However, we may estimate the acceptance using just the peak beta functions and dispersion. Since the maimum offset from the design ais, of a particle at the acceptance limit is well defined through (1), estimating the acceptance in this way should give reliable results. We have already seen that the dynamic aperture, neglecting the effects of errors, is outside the specified acceptance. We therefore need consider only the physical aperture. The design work so far has assumed physical dimensions for the magnets and beam pipe as shown in Table 4. The limiting beam pipe radius is compared to the specified acceptance through one wiggler cell, estimated using equation (1), in Figure 11. Plots for other cells are very similar, ecept that the beam pipe radius is a constant m. Table 4: Parameters of the physical aperture Dipole half-gap Multipole pole-tip radius Beam-pipe radius (outside wiggler) Wiggler half-gap Beam-pipe radius (through wiggler) m m m m m We see that the physical aperture is comfortably outside the specified acceptance, ecept for a short length near the center of the cell. It may be possible to correct this problem by retuning to reduce the vertical beta function in this region, or by opening the wiggler gap by a few millimeters. For many of the magnets outside the achromat, a pole-tip radius of 0.04 m appears to be somewhat larger than necessary. However, the required gradients in the magnets are not large, and there may be little benefit in reducing the radius. 11
13 horizontal vertical beam pipe radius specified acceptance /m s /m Figure 11 Horizontal and vertical specified acceptance through one wiggler cell. The solid curves show the horizontal and vertical edge beam size for edge emittance 45,000 mm-mrad, and momentum deviation 1.5%. The acceptance is also an issue for the injection and etraction components. In the septa, the minimum separation between the beam centroids on either side of the current return blade is 77.8 mm. The horizontal beta function at this point is m, so the edge beam size (from the center of the beam to its edge), assuming an edge emittance of 45,000 mmmrad, is 18.3 mm. With a blade thickness 6 of 23 mm, this leaves a clearance of 9.1 mm between the edge of the injected beam and the blade. The tolerances on the etracted beam are much looser, because the beam is smaller by an order of magnitude. In the quadrupole between the kicker and the septum, the kicked beam is offset by 37.1 mm. The beta function at this point is m, so the edge beam size is 8.82 mm. With the present geometry, the beam pipe radius at this point would need to be increased to beyond 46 mm. We propose that the pole-tip radius of this quadrupole be specified at 50 mm to accommodate the increased size of the beam pipe. 4 Future Work The pre-damping ring lattice design presented here meets the specifications for damping and dynamic acceptance. There are significant benefits in the double-bend achromat structure, over the racetrack lattice with TME arc cells that we have previously looked at. These include greater fleibility in design and (potentially) operation, reduced wiggler field and RF voltage, and control over the nonlinear dynamics through the use of harmonic setupoles. Although the circumference of the lattice is slightly increased, and the design is less efficient when viewed simply in terms of numbers of magnets when compared to the racetrack TME, we feel that the structure presented here is to be preferred. The acceptance of the present design appears to come close to that specified for the beam produced by the positron source. Some work needs to be done in the region of the 12
14 wiggler, which is currently limiting the acceptance to just below the specified values. Coupling effects are not epected to be a significant issue, since a fully coupled beam is acceptable. Other areas that need to be addressed are as follows: optimization of the lattice in terms of length, location of linear components and working point in tune space; optimization of nonlinear dynamics; estimate of field quality tolerances in dipoles, quadrupoles and setupoles; studies of the effects of orbit distortion on acceptance, and design of an orbit correction system; further design work on injection and etraction systems using specifications of components appropriate to the large acceptance; investigations of collective effects, including bunch lengthening and coupled bunch instabilities; detailed studies of the acceptance, using tracking with physical apertures. 5 Magnet Parameters Name Type Location Length Pole-tip Pole-tip Quadrupole Setupole radius field gradient c Gradient d Count BB Dipole BBCHP Dipole Chicane BBCHM Dipole Chicane QAFW Quadrupole Wiggler cell achromat QADW Quadrupole Wiggler cell achromat QAFCH Quadrupole Chicane cell achromat QADCH Quadrupole Chicane cell achromat QAF Quadrupole Achromat QAD Quadrupole Achromat QM1W Quadrupole Wiggler cell straight QM4W Quadrupole Wiggler cell straight QM0CH Quadrupole Chicane cell straight QM1CH Quadrupole Chicane cell straight QM4CH Quadrupole Chicane cell straight QM0 Quadrupole Straight QM1 Quadrupole Straight QM4 Quadrupole Straight SX Setupole Achromat SY Setupole Achromat S1 Setupole Wiggler cell straight S2 Setupole Wiggler cell straight c Normalised: ( B ) B ρ y d Normalised: ( ) 2 2 B y Bρ 13
15 6 Discussion of Phase Space Acceptance 6.1 Transverse Acceptance The unnormalized emittance of a beam is given by the mean betatron action of particles in the beam: ε 2 2 ( γ + α + ) 1 2 = J = 2 β Note that the single-particle emittance is defined as twice the betatron action: ε 2 2 sp, = 2J = γ + 2α + β and that the maimum amplitude of betatron oscillations for this particle is then β ε. The beam coming from the positron source is not epected to be gaussian, and sp, the distribution in the storage ring is not modified until the beam is damped close to equilibrium. For this reason, the ZDR gives the transverse acceptance in terms of an edge emittance, defined as the maimum betatron action of any particle in the beam 8 : 1 ( ) ( ε ) ε, = ma = ma edge J 2 sp, The maimum distance from the design orbit of a particle on the edge of the beam, and with a momentum deviation δ is therefore: ˆ 2β ε + η δ = edge, This epression must be used to specify the required (physical and dynamic) aperture of the lattice 9. For a non-gaussian distribution of particles within a beam, it is sometimes convenient to work with an effective rms emittance, defined through 10 : σ eff = 0.4FWHM where FWHM specifies the full width of the distribution at half the maimum. Let us assume a flat distribution in -y action space, up to some boundary J + = ε. The J y projection of the distribution onto either ais is parabolic, with FWHM = then have (assuming no dispersion): or ε = eff ε edge eff ε edge edge 3 εedge. We ε 0. 7 (2) The 0.09 m-rad acceptance 11 for the ZDR pre-damping ring design, refers to the normalized edge emittance of the injected beam 12 ; the edge emittance gives the largest betatron action of any particle in the beam. We note that the charge per bunch is specified with a margin of 20% to allow for losses throughout the ring; however, there are no plans at present for how these losses may be safely absorbed
16 The actual normalized edge emittance of the injected beam in the ZDR is m-rad. This is determined by the acceptance of the positron capture system, up to the entrance of the L-band 2 GeV booster linac 15. The positron output from the target was calculated for the ZDR using the EGS program, and the phase-space distribution at the end of the capture linac was then found by ray-tracing 16. Using (2), the value of 0.06 m-rad for the injected normalized edge emittance is consistent with Emma s assumption of m-rad for the injected normalized rms emittance 3, and the value of 0.04 m-rad quoted by Sheppard et al 17. Injection mismatches and other effects 18 (which may not be well understood) can increase the effective emittance by 50%; hence the acceptance value of 0.09 m-rad for the normalized edge acceptance. The specification for the injection errors is based on the assumption that the amplitude of the transverse beam jitter is equal to the edge beam size If the beam has edge emittance ε edge, and we apply an action offset J = 2 ε edge, (i.e. the action of every particle in the beam is increased by this amount) then the oscillation amplitude of the centroid of the beam is 2 β J = βε = σ. Studies of the pre-damping ring for the ZDR showed a dynamic aperture 20 significantly in ecess of 0.09 m-rad, even in the presence of field and alignment errors, and a momentum aperture of 2%. 6.2 Longitudinal Acceptance At the end of the positron capture linac (250 MeV), the energy spread is ±6%; this reduces to ±1.8% at the end of the booster linac 21. An RF acceptance of ±1.8% would require an RF voltage in ecess of 3.5 MV in the ZDR pre-damping ring design. Therefore, an energy compressor is included between the end of the L-band booster linac and the PPDR injector 22. The energy compressor reduces the energy spread to ±1%, and also reduces the jitter to 23 ±0.2% rms. The RF voltage of the ZDR PPDR is then chosen to be 2.0 MV, which gives an acceptance of 24 ±1.5%. Another effect of the energy compressor system is that the bunch length, z, increases from mm to 6.97 mm (note that the distribution in longitudinal phase space is highly non-gaussian). Emma s design for the pre-damping ring 3 gives an equilibrium energy spread,, of 0.089% and an equilibrium bunch length, z, of 7.53 mm. Thus, the energy compressor improves the match to the energy bucket, though the energy spread is still a factor of ten too large. 6.3 Present Acceptance Values The required acceptance values for the pre-damping ring most directly affect the designs of the magnets in the lattice, since these must have a sufficiently large bore to allow the passage of particles with betatron amplitudes and/or momentum deviations up to the acceptance values. The values shown in Table 5 are the present specifications for the transverse and longitudinal acceptance of the positron pre-damping ring, and are significantly reduced from the ZDR values. The given values refer to the beam at the eit of the energy compressor, i.e. before the pre-damping ring injection systems. The transverse 15 edge edge
17 acceptance gives the largest betatron action, including any transverse jitter in the action, for a particle at the eit of the energy compressor, that will be captured on injection into the damping ring. The energy acceptance gives the largest energy deviation for a particle at the eit of the energy compressor, that will be captured on injection into the storage ring. Note that the longitudinal phase-space of the injected and stored beams are highly mismatched, in the sense that a stored beam with an energy spread of 1% would have a bunch length of several centimeters, rather than several millimeters as is the case for the injected beam. The bunch length of the injected beam is therefore not an issue for the acceptance of the ring. The transverse and longitudinal acceptances should be treated as directly additive, rather than adding in quadrature. In other words, the transverse acceptance should be independent of energy deviation: this gives the acceptance a barrel shape in phase space, rather than a football shape. The transverse dimension of the accepted beam is then given by: ˆ = 2βε + ηδ ma where ε ma is the maimum accepted transverse emittance and δ ma is the maimum accepted momentum deviation, both quantities including jitter. This formula determines the physical and dynamic aperture of the damping ring. Table 5 Proposed acceptance values for net phase of pre-damping ring design work. These values refer to the positron beam at the eit of the energy compressor, in particular, before the pre-damping ring injection system. Assumed injected transverse edge emittance γε edge (horizontal and vertical) m-rad Assumed injected transverse jitter (horizontal and vertical) γj m-rad Transverse acceptance γε ma (normalized edge emittance) m-rad Assumed injected energy spread (half width) 1% Assumed injected energy jitter E E ±0.2% Energy acceptance δ ma ±1.5% Assumed injected bunch length σ 6.97 mm References ma z 1 A. Wolski, Lattice Description for NLC Main Damping Rings at 120 Hz, LCC-0061, April NLC Design Group, Zeroth-Order Design Report for the Net Linear Collider (ZDR), pp , SLAC Report 474, LBNL-PUB-5424, May P.Emma, Preliminary e + Pre-Damping Ring Design for the NLC, SLAC Memorandum, March 24, R.A. Rimmer et al, An RF Cavity for the NLC Damping Rings, Proceedings PAC S. de Santis, Coupled Bunch Instabilities in the NLC Damping Rings, LCC-0069, April ZDR, page
18 7 NLC Design Collaboration, 2001 Report on the Net Linear Collider: A Report Submitted to Snowmass 01, Chapter 5 Injector Systems, June ZDR, page 164. I am grateful to Tor Raubenheimer for clarifying the definition of edge emittance for me. 9 ZDR, page ZDR, page T. Kotseroglou et al, Recent Developments in the Design of the NLC Positron Source, Proceedings PAC ZDR, pages ZDR, page ZDR, page ZDR, pages ZDR, pages J.C.Sheppard et al, The NLC Injector System, Proceedings, PAC ZDR, page ZDR, pages ZDR, page ZDR, pages 98, ZDR, pages 132, ZDR, page 123, Table ZDR, page ZDR, page 151, Table
Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source
Lattice Design and Performance for PEP-X Light Source Yuri Nosochkov SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions by M-H. Wang, Y. Cai, X. Huang, K. Bane 48th ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop
More informationLinear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. Lattice Description for NLC Damping Rings at 120 Hz
LCC- 0061 Ma 2001 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes Lattice Description for NLC Damping Rings at 120 Hz Andrzej Wolski Lawrence Berkele National Laborator Abstract: We present a lattice design for
More informationLinear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes
LCC 0035 07/01/00 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes More Options for the NLC Bunch Compressors January 7, 2000 Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford, CA Abstract: The present bunch
More informationLattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC
Lattice Design for the Taiwan Photon Source (TPS) at NSRRC Chin-Cheng Kuo On behalf of the TPS Lattice Design Team Ambient Ground Motion and Civil Engineering for Low Emittance Electron Storage Ring Workshop
More informationCOMBINER RING LATTICE
CTFF3 TECHNICAL NOTE INFN - LNF, Accelerator Division Frascati, April 4, 21 Note: CTFF3-2 COMBINER RING LATTICE C. Biscari 1. Introduction The 3 rd CLIC test facility, CTF3, is foreseen to check the feasibility
More informationLongitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings
Longitudinal Top-up Injection for Small Aperture Storage Rings M. Aiba, M. Böge, Á. Saá Hernández, F. Marcellini and A. Streun Paul Scherrer Institut Introduction Lower and lower horizontal emittances
More informationOn-axis injection into small dynamic aperture
On-axis injection into small dynamic aperture L. Emery Accelerator Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory Future Light Source Workshop 2010 Tuesday March 2nd, 2010 On-Axis (Swap-Out) injection for
More informationCompressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam
EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN A&B DIVISION AB-Note-27-34 BI CERN-NUFACT-Note-153 Compressor Lattice Design for SPL Beam M. Aiba Abstract A compressor ring providing very short proton
More informationFirst propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL. A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division
First propositions of a lattice for the future upgrade of SOLEIL A. Nadji On behalf of the Accelerators and Engineering Division 1 SOLEIL : A 3 rd generation synchrotron light source 29 beamlines operational
More informationILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO)
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design (Modified FODO) Yi-Peng Sun 1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China 2 State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics
More informationAccelerator Physics. Accelerator Development
Accelerator Physics The Taiwan Light Source (TLS) is the first large accelerator project in Taiwan. The goal was to build a high performance accelerator which provides a powerful and versatile light source
More informationILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design **
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 1 Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing 2 Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Physics, Peking University, Beijing
More informationAccelerator. Physics of PEP-I1. Lecture #7. March 13,1998. Dr. John Seeman
Accelerator Physics of PEP-1 Lecture #7 March 13,1998 Dr. John Seeman Accelerator Physics of PEPJ John Seeman March 13,1998 1) What is PEP-? Lecture 1 2) 3) Beam parameters for an luminosity of 3~1~~/cm~/sec
More informationStart-to-end beam optics development and multi-particle tracking for the ILC undulator-based positron source*
SLAC-PUB-12239 January 27 (A) Start-to-end beam optics development and multi-particle tracking for the ILC undulator-based positron source* F. Zhou, Y. Batygin, Y. Nosochkov, J. C. Sheppard, and M. D.
More informationLow energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 78, 075107 2007 Low energy electron storage ring with tunable compaction factor S. Y. Lee, J. Kolski, Z. Liu, X. Pang, C. Park, W. Tam, and F. Wang Department of Physics,
More informationThe TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring
The TESLA Dogbone Damping Ring Winfried Decking for the TESLA Collaboration April 6 th 2004 Outline The Dogbone Issues: Kicker Design Dynamic Aperture Emittance Dilution due to Stray-Fields Collective
More informationA Two-Stage Bunch Compressor Option for the US Cold LC
LCC-0151 SLAC-TN-0-048 June 2004 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes A Two-Stage Bunch Compressor Option for the US Cold LC Abstract This note documents a set of expressions used to explore the issue
More information6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac
II-159 6 Bunch Compressor and Transfer to Main Linac 6.1 Introduction The equilibrium bunch length in the damping ring (DR) is 6 mm, too long by an order of magnitude for optimum collider performance (σ
More informationConceptual design of an accumulator ring for the Diamond II upgrade
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Conceptual design of an accumulator ring for the Diamond II upgrade To cite this article: I P S Martin and R Bartolini 218 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 167
More informationTransverse dynamics Selected topics. Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, v2.21
Transverse dynamics Selected topics Erik Adli, University of Oslo, August 2016, Erik.Adli@fys.uio.no, v2.21 Dispersion So far, we have studied particles with reference momentum p = p 0. A dipole field
More informationIII. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education
III. CesrTA Configuration and Optics for Ultra-Low Emittance David Rice Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education Introduction Outline CESR Overview CESR Layout Injector Wigglers
More informationLOW EMITTANCE MODEL FOR THE ANKA SYNCHROTRON RADIATION SOURCE
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT, Karlsruhe, Germany) Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia) LOW EMITTANCE MODEL FOR THE ANKA SYNCHROTRON RADIATION SOURCE (A.Papash - on
More informationStudy of Alternative Optics for the NLC Prelinac Collimation section
LCC 0057 03/01 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes Study of Alternative Optics for the NLC Prelinac Collimation section March 2001 Yuri Nosochkov, Pantaleo Raimondi, Tor Raubenheimer Stanford Linear
More informationD. Brandt, CERN. CAS Frascati 2008 Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt 1
Accelerators for Newcomers D. Brandt, CERN D. Brandt 1 Why this Introduction? During this school, you will learn about beam dynamics in a rigorous way but some of you are completely new to the field of
More informationHIRFL STATUS AND HIRFL-CSR PROJECT IN LANZHOU
HIRFL STATUS AND HIRFL-CSR PROJECT IN LANZHOU J. W. Xia, Y. F. Wang, Y. N. Rao, Y. J. Yuan, M. T. Song, W. Z. Zhang, P. Yuan, W. Gu, X. T. Yang, X. D. Yang, S. L. Liu, H.W.Zhao, J.Y.Tang, W. L. Zhan, B.
More informationPAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL
PAL LINAC UPGRADE FOR A 1-3 Å XFEL J. S. Oh, W. Namkung, Pohang Accelerator Laboratory, POSTECH, Pohang 790-784, Korea Y. Kim, Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, D-603 Hamburg, Germany Abstract With
More informationThomX Machine Advisory Committee. (LAL Orsay, March ) Ring Beam Dynamics
ThomX Machine Advisory Committee (LAL Orsay, March 20-21 2017) Ring Beam Dynamics A. Loulergue, M. Biagini, C. Bruni, I. Chaikovska I. Debrot, N. Delerue, A. Gamelin, H. Guler, J. Zang Programme Investissements
More informationA Project to convert TLS Booster to hadron accelerator 1. Basic design. 2. The injection systems:
A Project to convert TLS Booster to hadron accelerator 1. Basic design TLS is made of a 50 MeV electron linac, a booster from 50 MeV to 1.5 GeV, and a storage ring. The TLS storage ring is currently operating
More informationLinear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes. Design Studies of Positron Collection for the NLC
LCC-7 August 21 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes Design Studies of Positron Collection for the NLC Yuri K. Batygin, Ninod K. Bharadwaj, David C. Schultz,John C. Sheppard Stanford Linear Accelerator
More informationCSR Benchmark Test-Case Results
CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results Paul Emma SLAC January 4, 2 BERLIN CSR Workshop Chicane CSR Test-Case Chicane parameters symbol value unit Bend magnet length (not curved length) L B.5 m Drift length (projected;
More informationX-band RF driven hard X-ray FELs. Yipeng Sun ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012
X-band RF driven hard X-ray FELs Yipeng Sun ICFA Workshop on Future Light Sources March 5-9, 2012 Motivations & Contents Motivations Develop more compact (hopefully cheaper) FEL drivers, L S C X-band (successful
More informationLCLS Injector Straight Ahead Spectrometer C.Limborg-Deprey Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 8 th June 2005
LCLS Injector Straight Ahead Spectrometer C.Limborg-Deprey Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 8 th June 2005 Summary The spectrometer design was modified to allow the measurement of uncorrelated energy
More informationCERN Accelerator School. Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September Low Emittance Rings
CERN Accelerator School Intermediate Accelerator Physics Course Chios, Greece, September 2011 Low Emittance Rings Part 1: Beam Dynamics with Synchrotron Radiation Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and
More information1.5-GeV FFAG Accelerator as Injector to the BNL-AGS
1.5-GeV FFAG Accelerator as Injector to the BNL-AGS Alessandro G. Ruggiero M. Blaskiewicz,, T. Roser, D. Trbojevic,, N. Tsoupas,, W. Zhang Oral Contribution to EPAC 04. July 5-9, 5 2004 Present BNL - AGS
More informationBeam Dynamics. D. Brandt, CERN. CAS Bruges June 2009 Beam Dynamics D. Brandt 1
Beam Dynamics D. Brandt, CERN D. Brandt 1 Some generalities D. Brandt 2 Units: the electronvolt (ev) The electronvolt (ev)) is the energy gained by an electron travelling, in vacuum, between two points
More informationS. Guiducci. Table 1 PADME beam from Linac. Energy (MeV) 550. Number of positrons per pulse Pulse length (ns)
K K DA ΦNE TECHNICAL NOTE INFN - LNF, Accelerator Division Frascati, 11/01/2017 Note: G-73 PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS ON THE USE OF DAΦNE POSITRON RING AS A PULSE STRETCHER FOR THE DAΦNE LINAC S. Guiducci
More informationFACET-II Design, Parameters and Capabilities
FACET-II Design, Parameters and Capabilities 217 FACET-II Science Workshop, October 17-2, 217 Glen White Overview Machine design overview Electron systems Injector, Linac & Bunch compressors, Sector 2
More informationLCLS Accelerator Parameters and Tolerances for Low Charge Operations
LCLS-TN-99-3 May 3, 1999 LCLS Accelerator Parameters and Tolerances for Low Charge Operations P. Emma SLAC 1 Introduction An option to control the X-ray FEL output power of the LCLS [1] by reducing the
More informationLow Emittance Machines
Advanced Accelerator Physics Course RHUL, Egham, UK September 2017 Low Emittance Machines Part 1: Beam Dynamics with Synchrotron Radiation Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and the University of Liverpool,
More informationLow Emittance Machines
CERN Accelerator School Advanced Accelerator Physics Course Trondheim, Norway, August 2013 Low Emittance Machines Part 1: Beam Dynamics with Synchrotron Radiation Andy Wolski The Cockcroft Institute, and
More informationAccelerator Physics. Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE. Second Edition. S. Y.
Accelerator Physics Second Edition S. Y. Lee Department of Physics, Indiana University Tip World Scientific NEW JERSEY LONDON SINGAPORE BEIJING SHANGHAI HONG KONG TAIPEI BANGALORE Contents Preface Preface
More informationTransverse Field Profile of the NLC Damping Rings Electromagnet Wiggler
LCC 0038 29/04/00 CBP Tech Note - 234 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes Transverse Field Profile of the NLC Damping Rings Electromagnet Wiggler 29 April 2000 17 J. Corlett and S. Marks Lawrence
More informationSLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
SLS at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland Michael Böge 1 SLS Team at PSI Michael Böge 2 Layout of the SLS Linac, Transferlines Booster Storage Ring (SR) Beamlines and Insertion Devices
More informationProposal to convert TLS Booster for hadron accelerator
Proposal to convert TLS Booster for hadron accelerator S.Y. Lee -- Department of Physics IU, Bloomington, IN -- NSRRC Basic design TLS is made of a 50 MeV electron linac, a booster from 50 MeV to 1.5 GeV,
More informationILC Spin Rotator. Super B Workshop III. Presenter: Jeffrey Smith, Cornell University. with
ILC Spin Rotator Super B Workshop III Presenter: Jeffrey Smith, Cornell University with Peter Schmid, DESY Peter Tenenbaum and Mark Woodley, SLAC Georg Hoffstaetter and David Sagan, Cornell Based on NLC
More informationIP switch and big bend
1 IP switch and big bend Contents 1.1 Introduction..................................................... 618 1.2 TheIPSwitch.................................................... 618 1.2.1 OpticsDesign...............................................
More informationPBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY
PBL SCENARIO ON ACCELERATORS: SUMMARY Elias Métral Elias.Metral@cern.ch Tel.: 72560 or 164809 CERN accelerators and CERN Control Centre Machine luminosity Transverse beam dynamics + space charge Longitudinal
More informationX-Band RF Harmonic Compensation for Linear Bunch Compression in the LCLS
SLAC-TN-5- LCLS-TN-1-1 November 1,1 X-Band RF Harmonic Compensation for Linear Bunch Compression in the LCLS Paul Emma SLAC November 1, 1 ABSTRACT An X-band th harmonic RF section is used to linearize
More information10 GeV Synchrotron Longitudinal Dynamics
0 GeV Synchrotron Longitudinal Dynamics G. Dugan Laboratory of Nuclear Studies Cornell University Ithaca, NY 483 In this note, I provide some estimates of the parameters of longitudinal dynamics in the
More informationChoosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase
Third ILC Damping Rings R&D Mini-Workshop KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 18-20 December 2007 Choosing the Baseline Lattice for the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute
More information3. Synchrotrons. Synchrotron Basics
1 3. Synchrotrons Synchrotron Basics What you will learn about 2 Overview of a Synchrotron Source Losing & Replenishing Electrons Storage Ring and Magnetic Lattice Synchrotron Radiation Flux, Brilliance
More informationEmittance preservation in TESLA
Emittance preservation in TESLA R.Brinkmann Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY,Hamburg, Germany V.Tsakanov Yerevan Physics Institute/CANDLE, Yerevan, Armenia The main approaches to the emittance preservation
More informationStatus of linear collider designs:
Status of linear collider designs: Main linacs Design overview, principal open issues G. Dugan March 11, 2002 Linear colliders: main linacs The main linac is the heart of the linear collider TESLA, NLC/JLC,
More informationCEPC Linac Injector. HEP Jan, Cai Meng, Guoxi Pei, Jingru Zhang, Xiaoping Li, Dou Wang, Shilun Pei, Jie Gao, Yunlong Chi
HKUST Jockey Club Institute for Advanced Study CEPC Linac Injector HEP218 22 Jan, 218 Cai Meng, Guoxi Pei, Jingru Zhang, Xiaoping Li, Dou Wang, Shilun Pei, Jie Gao, Yunlong Chi Institute of High Energy
More informationImpedance & Instabilities
Impedance & Instabilities The concept of wakefields and impedance Wakefield effects and their relation to important beam parameters Beam-pipe geometry and materials and their impact on impedance An introduction
More informationOverview of Acceleration
Overview of Acceleration R B Palmer, Scott Berg, Steve Kahn (presented by Steve Kahn) Nufact-04 RF Frequency Acc types and System Studies Linacs RLA s FFAG s Injection/Extraction US Study 2a acceleration
More informationDesign, Parameters, and Tolerances for the LCLS First Bunch Compressor Chicane, BC1
Design Parameters and Tolerances for the CS First unch Compressor Chicane C1 P. Emma SAC October 7 4 ASTRACT This note describes the details of the CS C1 first-stage bunch compressor chicane design including
More informationThe Booster has three magnet systems for extraction: Kicker Ke, comprising two identical magnets and power supplies Septum Se
3.2.7 Booster Injection and Extraction 3.2.7.1 Overview The Booster has two magnet systems for injection: Septum Si Kicker Ki The Booster has three magnet systems for extraction: Kicker Ke, comprising
More informationFeasibility Study of Accumulator and Compressor for the 6-bunches SPL based Proton Driver
EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CERN A&B DEPARTMENT CERN-AB-28-6 BI Feasibility Study of Accumulator and Compressor for the 6-bunches SPL based Proton Driver M. Aiba CERN Geneva - Switzerland
More informationFACET-II Design Update
FACET-II Design Update October 17-19, 2016, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Glen White FACET-II CD-2/3A Director s Review, August 9, 2016 Planning for FACET-II as a Community Resource FACET-II Photo
More informationOperational Experience with HERA
PAC 07, Albuquerque, NM, June 27, 2007 Operational Experience with HERA Joachim Keil / DESY On behalf of the HERA team Contents Introduction HERA II Luminosity Production Experiences with HERA Persistent
More informationEmittance Growth and Tune Spectra at PETRA III
Emittance Growth and Tune Spectra at PETRA III Presentation at the ECLOUD 2010 workshop Rainer Wanzenberg ECLOUD 2010 October 8-12, 2010 Statler Hotel, Cornell University Ithaca, New York USA PETRA III
More informationSuperB: Ring Issues. U. Wienands SLAC PEP-II. U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II SuperB Workshop Frascati, 16-Mar-06
SuperB: Ring Issues U. Wienands SLAC PEP-II 1 Content Basic parameter estimate Examples of some lattices S.R. Handling Bunch length Collective effects incl beam lifetime Summary This presentation will
More informationCommissioning of PETRA III. Klaus Balewski on behalf of the PETRA III Team IPAC 2010, 25 May, 2010
Commissioning of PETRA III Klaus Balewski on behalf of the PETRA III Team IPAC 2010, 25 May, 2010 PETRA III Parameters Circumference (m) Energy (GeV) ε x (nm rad) ε y (pm rad) Current (ma) # bunches Straight
More informationCERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH THE CLIC POSITRON CAPTURE AND ACCELERATION IN THE INJECTOR LINAC
CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH CLIC Note - 819 THE CLIC POSITRON CAPTURE AND ACCELERATION IN THE INJECTOR LINAC A. Vivoli 1, I. Chaikovska 2, R. Chehab 3, O. Dadoun 2, P. Lepercq 2, F.
More informationExploration of a Tevatron-Sized Ultimate Light Source
Exploration of a Tevatron-Sized Ultimate Light Source Michael Borland Argonne National Laboratory March 2012 The submitted manuscript has been created by UChicago Argonne, LLC, Operator of Argonne National
More informationLinear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes
LCC-0124 SLAC-PUB-9814 September 2003 Linear Collider Collaboration Tech Notes Recent Electron Cloud Simulation Results for the NLC and for the TESLA Linear Colliders M. T. F. Pivi, T. O. Raubenheimer
More informationFIRST OPERATION OF THE SWISS LIGHT SOURCE
FIRST OPERATION OF THE SWISS LIGHT SOURCE M. Böge, PSI, Villigen, Switzerland Abstract The Swiss Light Source (SLS) at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) is the most recent 3rd generation light source to
More informationHadron cancer therapy complex using nonscaling fixed field alternating gradient accelerator and gantry design
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS - ACCELERATORS AND BEAMS 10, 054701 (2007) Hadron cancer therapy complex using nonscaling fixed field alternating gradient accelerator and gantry design E. Keil* CERN, Geneva,
More informationBernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC
Bernhard Holzer, CERN-LHC * Bernhard Holzer, CERN CAS Prague 2014 x Liouville: in reasonable storage rings area in phase space is constant. A = π*ε=const x ε beam emittance = woozilycity of the particle
More informationAccelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: 1-5)
Accelerator Physics Homework #3 P470 (Problems: -5). Particle motion in the presence of magnetic field errors is (Sect. II.2) y + K(s)y = B Bρ, where y stands for either x or z. Here B = B z for x motion,
More informationLIS section meeting. PS2 design status. Y. Papaphilippou. April 30 th, 2007
LIS section meeting PS2 design status Y. Papaphilippou April 30 th, 2007 Upgrade of the injector chain (R. Garoby, PAF) Proton flux / Beam power 50 MeV 160 MeV Linac2 Linac4 1.4 GeV ~ 5 GeV PSB SPL RCPSB
More informationRADIATION SOURCES AT SIBERIA-2 STORAGE RING
RADIATION SOURCES AT SIBERIA-2 STORAGE RING V.N. Korchuganov, N.Yu. Svechnikov, N.V. Smolyakov, S.I. Tomin RRC «Kurchatov Institute», Moscow, Russia Kurchatov Center Synchrotron Radiation undulator undulator
More informationOPTIMIZATION OF COMPENSATION CHICANES IN THE LCLS-II BEAM DELIVERY SYSTEM
OPTIMIZATION OF COMPENSATION CHICANES IN THE LCLS-II BEAM DELIVERY SYSTEM LCLS-II TN-15-41 11/23/2015 J. Qiang, M. Venturini November 23, 2015 LCLSII-TN-15-41 1 Introduction L C L S - I I T E C H N I C
More informationparameter symbol value beam energy E 15 GeV transverse rms beam size x;y 25 m rms bunch length z 20 m charge per bunch Q b 1nC electrons per bunch N b
LCLS{TN{98{2 March 1998 SLAC/AP{109 November 1997 Ion Eects in the LCLS Undulator 1 Frank Zimmermann Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309 Abstract I calculate the
More informationAnalysis of KEK-ATF Optics and Coupling Using Orbit Response Matrix Analysis 1
Analysis of KEK-ATF Optics and Coupling Using Orbit Response Matrix Analysis 1 A. Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory J. Nelson, M. Ross, M. Woodley Stanford Linear Accelerator Center S. Mishra
More informationLow-Emittance Beams and Collective Effects in the ILC Damping Rings
Low-Emittance Beams and Collective Effects in the ILC Damping Rings And Wolski Lawrence Berkele National Laborator Super-B Factor Meeting, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati November 1, 005 Comparison of
More informationProposta per l'uso di DAFNE come allungatore d'impulso per il fascio di positroni del Linac
Proposta per l'uso di DAFNE come allungatore d'impulso per il fascio di positroni del Linac S. Guiducci 29 novembre 2017 11/29/17 1 The PADME experiment at BTF The PADME experiment proposes a search for
More informationNick Walker (for WG3) Snowmass, 2001
Nick Walker (for WG) Snowmass, 2 General Layout Complete Lattice Final Telescope Beam switchyard Collimation System - basic concept - spoiler protection (MES) - halo tracking (dynamic aperture) Hardware
More informationPhysics 610. Adv Particle Physics. April 7, 2014
Physics 610 Adv Particle Physics April 7, 2014 Accelerators History Two Principles Electrostatic Cockcroft-Walton Van de Graaff and tandem Van de Graaff Transformers Cyclotron Betatron Linear Induction
More informationFuture Light Sources March 5-9, 2012 Low- alpha mode at SOLEIL 1
Introduction: bunch length measurements Reminder of optics Non- linear dynamics Low- alpha operation On the user side: THz and X- ray short bunch science CSR measurement and modeling Future Light Sources
More informationIntroduction to particle accelerators
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Lecce, 17 June 2006 Introductory remarks Particle accelerators are black boxes producing either flux of particles impinging on
More informationLattices for Light Sources
Andreas Streun Swiss Light Source SLS, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland Contents: Global requirements: size, brightness, stability Lattice building blocks: magnets and other devices Emittance:
More informationSpin Dynamics at the NLC
BI TN-2004-3 Revision 0: June 1, 2004 Spin Dynamics at the NLC Ken Moffeit and Mike Woods SLAC Abstract This note describes spin transport and depolarization effects at the NLC. We also discuss the difference
More informationFirst Collective Effects Measurements in NSLS-II A. Blednykh Accelerator Physicist, BNL/NSLS-II Sep , 2014
First Collective Effects Measurements in NSLS-II A. Blednykh Accelerator Physicist, BNL/NSLS-II Sep. 17-19, 2014 (LOWεRING 2014) 1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Outline Phase 1 (25mA / PETRA-III) and Phase
More informationThe FAIR Accelerator Facility
The FAIR Accelerator Facility SIS300 existing GSI proton linac SIS18 UNILAC SIS100 HESR pbar target SuperFRS goals: higher intensity (low charge states) higher energy (high charge states) production of
More informationPreliminary design study of JUICE. Joint Universities International Circular Electronsynchrotron
Preliminary design study of JUICE Joint Universities International Circular Electronsynchrotron Goal Make a 3th generation Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource at 3 GeV Goal Make a 3th generation Synchrotron
More informationPretzel scheme of CEPC
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai, F. Su HKUST, Hong Kong IAS program on High Energy
More informationDiagnostics at the MAX IV 3 GeV storage ring during commissioning. PPT-mall 2. Åke Andersson On behalf of the MAX IV team
Diagnostics at the MAX IV 3 GeV storage ring during commissioning PPT-mall 2 Åke Andersson On behalf of the MAX IV team IBIC Med 2016, linje Barcelona Outline MAX IV facility overview Linac injector mode
More informationSBF Accelerator Principles
SBF Accelerator Principles John Seeman SLAC Frascati Workshop November 11, 2005 Topics The Collision Point Design constraints going backwards Design constraints going forward Parameter relations Luminosity
More information!"#$%$!&'()$"('*+,-')'+-$#..+/+,0)&,$%.1&&/$ LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS
LONGITUDINAL BEAM DYNAMICS Elias Métral BE Department CERN The present transparencies are inherited from Frank Tecker (CERN-BE), who gave this course last year and who inherited them from Roberto Corsini
More informationPhase Space Study of the Synchrotron Oscillation and Radiation Damping of the Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations
ScienceAsia 28 (2002 : 393-400 Phase Space Study of the Synchrotron Oscillation and Radiation Damping of the Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations Balabhadrapatruni Harita*, Masumi Sugawara, Takehiko
More informationDynamic Aperture in Damping Rings with Realistic Wigglers. Yunhai Cai. Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025
Dynamic Aperture in Damping Rings with Realistic Wigglers SLAC-PUB-1184 April 5 Yunhai Cai Stanford Linear Accelerator Center 575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 945 Abstract The International Linear Collider
More informationPhysics 575 Accelerator Physics and Technologies for Linear Colliders Winter 2002 Chapter 5 Damping Rings. L. Emery Argonne National Laboratory
Physics 575 Accelerator Physics and Technologies for Linear Colliders Winter 2002 Chapter 5 Damping Rings L. Emery Argonne National Laboratory February 7th, 2002 Contents 5.1 Introduction............................
More informationStatus of Fast Ion Instability Studies
Zur Anzeige wird der QuickTime Dekompressor TIFF (Unkomprimiert) benötigt. Status of Fast Ion Instability Studies Guoxing Xia presented by E. Elsen European LC Workshop, Jan 8-9, 2007, Daresbury 0 Ion
More informationFURTHER UNDERSTANDING THE LCLS INJECTOR EMITTANCE*
Proceedings of FEL014, Basel, Switzerland FURTHER UNDERSTANDING THE LCLS INJECTOR EMITTANCE* F. Zhou, K. Bane, Y. Ding, Z. Huang, and H. Loos, SLAC, Menlo Park, CA 9405, USA Abstract Coherent optical transition
More informationNumerical study of FII in the ILC Damping Ring
Numerical study of FII in the ILC Damping Ring L. Wang, Y. Cai and T. Raubenheimer SLAC LCDR07 - Damping Rings R&D Meeting March 5-7, 2007 INFN-LNF, Frascati Outline Introduction Simulation Wake of ion
More informationBeam Transfer Lines. Brennan Goddard CERN
Beam Transfer Lines Distinctions between transfer lines and circular machines Linking machines together Trajectory correction Emittance and mismatch measurement Blow-up from steering errors, optics mismatch
More informationE. Wilson - CERN. Components of a synchrotron. Dipole Bending Magnet. Magnetic rigidity. Bending Magnet. Weak focusing - gutter. Transverse ellipse
Transverse Dynamics E. Wilson - CERN Components of a synchrotron Dipole Bending Magnet Magnetic rigidity Bending Magnet Weak focusing - gutter Transverse ellipse Fields and force in a quadrupole Strong
More informationarxiv: v1 [physics.acc-ph] 21 Oct 2014
SIX-DIMENSIONAL WEAK STRONG SIMULATIONS OF HEAD-ON BEAM BEAM COMPENSATION IN RHIC arxiv:.8v [physics.acc-ph] Oct Abstract Y. Luo, W. Fischer, N.P. Abreu, X. Gu, A. Pikin, G. Robert-Demolaize BNL, Upton,
More information