A NOTE ON COMPOSITIONALITY IN THE FIRST ORDER LANGUAGE
|
|
- Constance Lizbeth Stephens
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Janusz Maciaszek Luis Villegas-Forero A NOTE ON COMPOSITIONALITY IN THE FIRST ORDER LANGUAGE Abstract The main objective of this paper is to present the syntax and semantic of First Order Language in a way such that all functors (including the quantifiers) are both treated categorematically and considered as (quasi) intensional. It is possible by introdicing only one composition condition. 1. Introduction The logical expressions in First Order Language (FOL) are invariably treated syncategorematically, i.e. they are defined, by context, in the syntax and semantics. This is particulary evident in the case of quantifying expressions 1. Tarski s version of FOL semantics, based on the notion of the satisfaction of a formula by sequences of individuals in a given universe, is a case in point: a quantifying expression has no explicit denotation, but simply shows the way in which the satisfaction of the formula by a particular sequence depends on the satisfaction of the subformula within the quantifier s scope by one or all of the sequences that are accessible to the sequence in question. Let us consider the FOL formulae yp (y) and yp (x), and let us suppose the universe of interpretation to be the set {a, b}. The relevant interpretation sequences are s 1 =< a, a >, s 2 =< a, b >, s 3 =< b, a > and s 4 =< b, b >, where the first position corresponds to x and the second to y. Let f be an interpretation function such that f(p ) = {a} (or the corresponding characteristic function). According to Tarski s definition of satisfaction, yp (x) and P (x) are satisfied by s 1, their denotations for this 1 An important exception is Lewis in [3]:
2 sequence is therefore 1. Hence if y has its own denotation and this denotation is an extensional truth function, the denotation of yp (y) for s 1 must also be 1, since P (y) too is satisfied by s 1. But the denotation of yp (y) is not 1, so either y has no denotation of its own (the conclusion accepted by Tarski in developing his syncategorematic account of quantification and elaborated in a very systematical way by Suszko in [5]), or it has a denotation that is not an extensional truth function. The above example shows that if, unlike Tarski, we insist that quantifying expressions have explicit denotations, then we are bound to accept that these denotations cannot be extensional truth functions. In fact, the well-known analogy between FOL quantifiers and S 5 modal operators (Kuhn, [2]), suggests that it is feasible to endow quantifying expressions with quasi-intensional denotation by using sequences in the same way that possible worlds were used by Montague to construct denotation for modal operators. We shall therefore define the interpretational counterpart of an expression (its quasi-sense) as a quasi-intension, i.e. as a function from sequences to a extension of the kind appropriate to the syntactic category of the expression 2. The quasi-sense of a formula, for example, will be a function from sequences to truth values, and the quasi-sense of a quantificational prefix will assign for each sequence an extension which is a function whose arguments are quasi-intensions of formulae and its values are truth values. So, quantificational prefixes will be treated categorematically as complex monary connectives whose quasi-intensions and extensions depend systematically on the quasi-intensions and extensions of their component parts (quantifiers and variables); and this will involve specification and application of an appropriate composition condition. Let be, in general, α the intension 3 of any expression α (whose extension for any sequence s is therefore α (s)). One can introduce in the beginning two composition conditions: the first (Montague s Condition) establishes that if α is an extensional functor (e.g. a sentential connective), β its argument and s a sequence, then α(β) (s) = α (s)( β (s)). 2 In Montague proper senses are treated as intensions, i.e. as functions from possible worlds to appropriate extensions. 3 In the following, both in the main text and the footnotes, we will supress in order to simplify where there is no risk of confusion the prefix quasi. 207
3 The second (henceforth the (*) Condition) establishes that if α is now an intensional functor (e.g., a quantifying expression), then α[β] (s) = α (s)( β ), where we use square brackets to enclose the argument of the intensional functor. Problem: the new condition works well in intensional contexts, but it does not work in purely extensional contexts where Montague s Condition is still necessary. Montague could deal with the first condition by introducing the operator of intensialization. We do not follow him and we get rid of the need for Montague s Condition by making all functors intensional, and hence amenable to application of the (*) Condition. In consequence we must furnish the well know extensional functors like sentential conections and extensional predicates, with new intensional types. In order to develop the application of the new composition condition for all functors of FOL, let us introduce its syntax and semantics in a systematic way. 2. Syntax The syntax of FOL is a simple application of the general Montagovian scheme (Montague [4]). For simplicity, the version developed here only admits unary and binary predicates, but generalization to predicates of arbitrary order is quite straightforward. is the set of category symbols, containing CONST (individual constants), VAR (individual variables), TER (terms), FOR (formulas), 1 PRED (unary predicates), 2 PRED (binary predicates), 1 CON (unary connectives), 2 CON (binary connectives), QUANT (quantifiers). The lexicon of FOL is (X δ ) δ, where X δ is the set of basic expressions of category symbol δ. In particular X CONST = {c 1, c 2,...} X VAR = {v 1, v 2,...} X TER = X CONST X VAR X 1PRED = {P 1 1, P 2 1,...} X 2PRED = {P 1 2, P 2 2,...} X 1CON = { } X 2CON = {,,, } X QUANT = {, } X FOR = 208
4 Let < A, F > be the free algebra generated by (X δ ) δ, where F is the juxtaposition operation such that for all α, β A, F (α, β) = [α, β]. The syntactic system 4 of FOL is defined as S =< A, F, (X δ ) δ, (R η ) η H, FOR>, where H = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} and (R η ) η H is the family of syntactic rules, where each rule is of the general form < F, < δ 1, δ 2 >, δ 3 >, readable as: if α 1 is an expresion of the category symbol δ 1 and α 2 is an expresion of the category symbol δ 2, then F (α 1, α 2 ) is an expresion of the categry symbol δ 3. In particular: R1 = < F, < 2P RED, T ER >, 1P RED > R2 = < F, < 1P RED, T ER >, F OR > R3 = < F, < 2CON, F OR >, 1CON > R4 = < F, < 1CON, F OR >, F OR > R5 = < F, < QUANT, V AR >, 1CON >. The family (C δ ) δ of syntactic categories of FOL is the smallest family of sets such that 1. (Cδ ) δ A 2. For all δ, X δ C δ 3. For all α 1, α 2 A and all δ 1, δ 2, δ 3 if α 1 C δ1, α 2 C δ2 and < F, < δ 1, δ 2 >, δ 3 > (R η ) η H, then F (α 1, α 2 ) C δ3. Finally, we define FOL as (C δ ) δ. Thus FOL is the set of all its well-formed expressions, not just its formulae. 3. Abstract semantics Adapting Montague, we develop the semantics of FOL in two stages: ontology and interpretation. We define our ontological scheme in terms of an abstract type structure and what we call a Tarskian frame. We define T, the class of types of things, as the smallest set such that 1. e, t T, where e is the type of individuals and t the type of truth values. 2. If σ, τ T, then < σ, τ > T, where < σ, τ > is the type of functions from things of type σ to things of type τ. 4 Following Dowty [1], we use the term syntactic system for what Montague called a disambiguated language. 209
5 3. If τ T then < q, τ > T. < q, τ > is the type of intensions corresponding to things of type τ 5. A Tarskian frame (TF) F is defined as an ordered triple < E F, SEQ F, Ac F > such that 1. E F is a denumerable set of individuals; 2. SEQ F = E ω is the set of all infinite sequences of members of E F. 3. Ac F, the accessibility function, is a function from SEQ F ω to {0, 1} SEQ F, such that for all s, s SEQ F and i ω, 1 if pr j (s ) = pr j (s) Ac F (s, i)(s ) = for all j ω other than i 0 otherwise. where pr j (s) is just the j-th object of s. The notion of Tarskian frame thus incorporates the relation between sequences that in standard Tarskian semantics is used to apply the concept of satisfaction to quantified formulae. We now relate things types with possible denotation. Given a type system T and a T F F, we define the family of sets of typified things (D τ,f ) τ T, as the smallest family such that 1. D e,f = E F 2. D t,f = {0, 1} 3. For all σ, τ T, D <σ,τ>,f = D D σ,f τ,f 4. For all τ T, D <q,τ>,f = D SEQ F τ,f A possible interpretation for FOL is defined as an ordered triple I =< ϑ, ζ, f > such that 1. ϑ =< B, G, (Y <q,τ>,f ) τ T (S ν ) ν H, < q, t >> is a semantic system, such that: a) B (D <q,τ>,f ) τ T is the domain of intensions of ϑ b) < B, G > is the semantic algebra similar to the syntactic algebra < A, F > c) (Y <q,τ>,f ) τ T, the family of sets of basic intensions of ϑ, is such that: 5 Here q represents the syncategorematic type of sequences. It will play an analogous role to Montague s type s. 210
6 (i) (Y <q,τ>,f ) τ T B (ii) Y <q,e>,f E SEQ F F (iii) Y <q,t>,f {0, 1} SEQ F (iv) Y <q,τ>,f = if τ e or τ t d) (S η ) η H is the family of semantic rules of ϑ (1 1 corresponding to syntactic rules) such that for each η H, S η is of the form < G, << q, σ 1 >, < q, σ 2 >>, < q, τ >>, where σ 1, σ 2, τ T. e) < q, t > is the distinguished intension type. 2. ζ is any function from to T such that ζ(for) = t (ζ assigns to each syntactic category symbol the type of extensions of the members of that category). 3. f is a function from (X δ ) δ to B such that if α X δ, then f(α) K <q,ζ(δ)>,ϑ, where in general (K <q,τ>,ϑ )t T is the family of intensions generated by ϑ, defined as the smallest family of sets such that a) (K <q,τ>,ϑ ) τ T B b) for all τ T, Y <q,τ>,f K <q,τ>,ϑ c) for all b 1, b 2 B, σ 1, σ 2, τ T if b 1 K <q,σ1>,ϑ, and b 2 K <q,σk >,ϑ and there exists η H such that if S η =< G, << q, σ 1 >, < q, σ 2 >>, < q, τ >>, then G(b 1, b 2 ) K <q,τ>,ϑ. (f assigns to each basic expression α of FOL an intension of the type corresponding to the type of extension assigned by ζ to the appropriate category symbol) 6. By the freedom of the syntactic algebra, f induces a generalized meaning function. I, the only homomorphism from the syntactic algebra to the semantic algebra such that f. I. This homomorphism permits to connect syntactic and semantic rules in the following way: For each η H, δ 1, δ 2, δ 3 and α 1, α 2 A, if R η =< F, < δ 1, δ 2 >, δ 3 >, α 1 C δ1 and α 2 C δ2, then a) S η =< G, << q, ζ(δ 1 ) >, < q, ζ(δ 2 ) >>, < q, ζ(δ 3 ) >> b) α 1 I K <q,ζ(δ1)>,ϑ and α 2 I K <q,ζ(δ2)>,ϑ c) G( α 1 I, α 2 I ) K 7 <q,ζ(δ3)>,ϑ 6 It is perhaps opportune at this point to stress that the property of being extensional or intensional is purely ontological, being only determined by the formal ontology adopted. 7 These notions allow us to define a model of FOL as an ordered pair M =< I, s > where I is an interpretation for FOL and s SEQ F, where F is the TF underlying the semantic system on which I is based. This definition deviates obviously from Tarski and 211
7 4. Logical constraints The semantic notions introduced so far have merely ensured algebraic compatibility between the syntax of FOL and its possible interpretations. We now impose logical constraints, i.e. we constrain possible interpretations to conform to the traditional use of both logical expressions (connectives and quantifying expressions) and extralogical expressions (variables, constants and predicates). A possible interpretation I =< ϑ, ζ, f > based on a semantic system ϑ is a logically admissible interpretation iff ζ complies with the conditions 1 and. I complies with the conditions a) ζ(var) = ζ(const) = ζ(ter) = e b) ζ(1pred) = << q, e >, t > c) ζ(2pred) = << q, e >, << q, e >, t >> d) ζ(1con) = << q, t >, t > e) ζ(2con) = << q, t >, << q, t >, t >> f) ζ(quant) = << q, e >, << q, t >, t >> Thus the extension type assigned to each functorial category symbol is a type of function defined on a set of intensions. The type of sense corresponding to each category symbol is the intension type corresponding to its denotation type. 2. a) General composition constraint ((*) Condition) For all δ 1, δ 2, δ 3, α 1, α 2 A and η H, if α 1 C δ1, α 2 C δ2 and R η =< F 1, < δ 1, δ 2 >, δ 3 >, then for all s SEQ F F (α 1, α 2 ) I (s) = [α 1, α 2 ] I (s) = G( α 1 I, α 2 I )(s) = α 1 I (s)( α 2 I ) b) Constraints on extralogical expressions (i) For all v i V VAR and s SEQ F, v i I (s) = pr i (s) (ii) For all c i C CONST and s, s SEQ F, c i I (s) = c i I (s ) even somewhat from Montague s [6], but allows us to give specific definitions of some well-known semantic concepts of FOL, for example, truth relative to a model (which is the counterpart of the Tarskian notion of satisfaction by a sequence), truth in an interpretation, (which is the counterpart of the Tarskian concept of truth in a model), and validity. So the logic that can be expressed by our version of FOL is just First Order Logic. 212
8 (iii) For all Pi 1 C 1PRED, t 1, t 2 C TER and s, s SEQ F, if t 1 I (s) = t 2 I (s ), then Pi 1 I (s)( t 1 I ) = Pi 1 I (s )( t 2 I ) (iv) For all Pi 2 C 2PRED, t 1, t 2, t 1, t 2 C TER and s, s SEQ F, if t 1 I (s) = t 1 I (s ) and t 2 I (s) = t 2 I (s ) then Pi 2 I (s)( t 1 I )( t 2 I ) = Pi 2 I (s )( t 1 I )( t 2 I ) both (iii) and (iv) can be regarded as extensional constraints on predicates. c) Constraints on logical expressions (i) For all φ C FOR, s SEQ F, [ φ] I (s) = 1 iff φ I (s) = 0 what implies the extensionality of negation: For all φ, φ C FOR and s, s SEQ F, [ φ] I (s) = [ φ ] I (s ) iff φ I (s) = φ I (s ). (ii) For all φ, φ C FOR, s SEQ F [[ φ]φ ] I (s) = 1 iff φ I (s) = φ I (s) = 1 [[ φ]φ ] I (s) = 1 iff φ I (s) = 1 or φ I (s) = 1 [[ φ]φ ] I (s) = 1 iff φ I (s) = 0 or φ I (s) = 1 [[ φ]φ ] I (s) = 1 iff φ I (s) = φ I (s) what implies condition of extensionality For all ξ C 2CON, φ 1, φ 2, φ 1, φ 2 C FOR, s, s SEQ F, [[ξφ 1 ]φ 2 ] I (s) = [[ξφ 1]φ 2 ] I (s ) iff φ 1 I (s) = φ 1 I (s ) and φ 2 I (s) = φ 2 I (s ). (iii) By successive applications of the (*) Condition, the following constraints establish the intensions and extensions of the universal and existential quantifiers and the quantifying prefixes, in a way that is equivalent to the Tarskian definition of satisfaction for quantified formulae. The difference is that whereas Tarski s definition is contextual, ours is explicit. So, the result of successively applying the intension of the universal (existential) quantifier to a sequence s, applying the resulting function to the intension corresponding to the i-th variable, and applying the function finally resulting to the sense corresponding to the formula quantified, is 1 iff the function determining accessibility to s at i is a subfunction of (has non-empty intersection with) the sense corresponding to the formula quantified. It is clear that the final truth value depends only on the sequences that are accessible in each case, not on the whole of SEQ F. 213
9 For all i ω, v i C VAR, s SEQ F, φ C FOR [[ v i ]φ] I (s) = [ v i ] I (s)( φ I ) = I (s)( v i I )( φ I ) = 1 iff {s : ac(s, i)(s ) = 1} {s : φ I (s ) = 1} [[ v i ]φ] I (s) = [ v i ] I (s)( φ I ) = I (s)( v i I )( φ I ) = 1 iff {s : ac(s, i)(s ) = 1} {s : φ I (s ) = 1} = Conclusion. Suszko in [5] was the first in proposing an elaborated account of the syntactic structure, underlying ontology, and semantic of a restricted version of FOL. The approach presented in our paper is wider. It introduces (in the context of Montague s program) a unique and novel composition condition, which permits a systematic, simple and uniform computation of the denotation (semantic value) of all formulas, including e.g., xp y or x xp x, which were not well formed in Suszko s account. References [1] D. D. Dowty et all, Introduction to Montague Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht, [2] S. Kuhn, Quantifiers as Modal Operators, Studia Logica 39 (1980), pp [3] D. K. Lewis, General Semantics Sythese 22 (1970), pp [4] R. Montague, Universal Grammar, Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of R. Montague, edited by R. Thomason, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1976, pp [5] R. Suszko, Syntactic Structure and Semantical Reference, Studia Logica 8 (1958), pp , 9 (1960), pp Department of Logic University of Lódź Matejki 34a Lódź Poland janmac@krysia.uni.lodz.pl Department of Logic University of Santiago de Compostela Campus Universitario Sur Santiago de Compostela Spain lflpvill@.usc.es 214
Fibrational Semantics
Fibrational Semantics Brice Halimi Paris Ouest University & Sphere Introduction The question What can Set Theory do for Philosophy? would never be asked nowadays. The main reason for dismissing such a
More informationRelativizing Tarskian Variables
Relativizing Tarskian Variables Brice Halimi Paris Ouest University Two main goals: Introducing the concept of fibration (that comes from geometry) and showing that it holds out a natural way to formalize
More informationTHE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS OF STANDARD QUANTIFICATION THEORY WITH IDENTITY (SQT)
THE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS OF STANDARD QUANTIFICATION THEORY WITH IDENTITY (SQT) The construction of this theory begins with the description of the syntax of the formal language of the theory, by first enumerating
More information1. Tarski consequence and its modelling
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 36:1/2 (2007), pp. 7 19 Grzegorz Malinowski THAT p + q = c(onsequence) 1 Abstract The famous Tarski s conditions for a mapping on sets of formulas of a language:
More informationLecture 7. Logic. Section1: Statement Logic.
Ling 726: Mathematical Linguistics, Logic, Section : Statement Logic V. Borschev and B. Partee, October 5, 26 p. Lecture 7. Logic. Section: Statement Logic.. Statement Logic..... Goals..... Syntax of Statement
More informationMeaning and Reference INTENSIONAL AND MODAL LOGIC. Intensional Logic. Frege: Predicators (general terms) have
INTENSIONAL AND MODAL LOGIC Meaning and Reference Why do we consider extensions to the standard logical language(s)? Requirements of knowledge representation / domain modelling Intensional expressions:
More informationKRIPKE S THEORY OF TRUTH 1. INTRODUCTION
KRIPKE S THEORY OF TRUTH RICHARD G HECK, JR 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this note is to give a simple, easily accessible proof of the existence of the minimal fixed point, and of various maximal fixed
More informationClassical First-Order Logic
Classical First-Order Logic Software Formal Verification Maria João Frade Departmento de Informática Universidade do Minho 2008/2009 Maria João Frade (DI-UM) First-Order Logic (Classical) MFES 2008/09
More informationQuantification in the predicate calculus
Quantification in the predicate calculus PHIL 43916 eptember 5, 2012 1. The problem posed by quantified sentences... 1 2. yntax of PC... 2 3. Bound and free iables... 3 4. Models and assignments... 4 5.
More informationApplied Logic. Lecture 1 - Propositional logic. Marcin Szczuka. Institute of Informatics, The University of Warsaw
Applied Logic Lecture 1 - Propositional logic Marcin Szczuka Institute of Informatics, The University of Warsaw Monographic lecture, Spring semester 2017/2018 Marcin Szczuka (MIMUW) Applied Logic 2018
More informationChapter 4: Classical Propositional Semantics
Chapter 4: Classical Propositional Semantics Language : L {,,, }. Classical Semantics assumptions: TWO VALUES: there are only two logical values: truth (T) and false (F), and EXTENSIONALITY: the logical
More informationSome consequences of compactness in Lukasiewicz Predicate Logic
Some consequences of compactness in Lukasiewicz Predicate Logic Luca Spada Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of Salerno www.logica.dmi.unisa.it/lucaspada 7 th Panhellenic Logic
More informationAlgebraizing Hybrid Logic. Evangelos Tzanis University of Amsterdam Institute of Logic, Language and Computation
Algebraizing Hybrid Logic Evangelos Tzanis University of Amsterdam Institute of Logic, Language and Computation etzanis@science.uva.nl May 1, 2005 2 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 A guide to this thesis..........................
More informationA generalization of modal definability
A generalization of modal definability Tin Perkov Polytechnic of Zagreb Abstract. Known results on global definability in basic modal logic are generalized in the following sense. A class of Kripke models
More informationCHAPTER 4 CLASSICAL PROPOSITIONAL SEMANTICS
CHAPTER 4 CLASSICAL PROPOSITIONAL SEMANTICS 1 Language There are several propositional languages that are routinely called classical propositional logic languages. It is due to the functional dependency
More informationTeam Semantics and Recursive Enumerability
Team Semantics and Recursive Enumerability Antti Kuusisto University of Wroc law, Poland, Technical University of Denmark Stockholm University, Sweden antti.j.kuusisto@uta.fi Abstract. It is well known
More informationExistential Second-Order Logic and Modal Logic with Quantified Accessibility Relations
Existential Second-Order Logic and Modal Logic with Quantified Accessibility Relations preprint Lauri Hella University of Tampere Antti Kuusisto University of Bremen Abstract This article investigates
More informationPrefixed Tableaus and Nested Sequents
Prefixed Tableaus and Nested Sequents Melvin Fitting Dept. Mathematics and Computer Science Lehman College (CUNY), 250 Bedford Park Boulevard West Bronx, NY 10468-1589 e-mail: melvin.fitting@lehman.cuny.edu
More informationFirst-order Logic: Modality and Intensionality
First-order Logic: Modality and Intensionality Zoran Majkić International Society for Research in Science and Technology PO Box 2464 Tallahassee, FL 32316-2464 USA majk.1234@yahoo.com http://zoranmajkic.webs.com/
More informationCSE 1400 Applied Discrete Mathematics Definitions
CSE 1400 Applied Discrete Mathematics Definitions Department of Computer Sciences College of Engineering Florida Tech Fall 2011 Arithmetic 1 Alphabets, Strings, Languages, & Words 2 Number Systems 3 Machine
More informationPART II QUANTIFICATIONAL LOGIC
Page 1 PART II QUANTIFICATIONAL LOGIC The language m of part I was built from sentence letters, symbols that stand in for sentences. The logical truth of a sentence or the logical validity of an argument,
More information185.A09 Advanced Mathematical Logic
185.A09 Advanced Mathematical Logic www.volny.cz/behounek/logic/teaching/mathlog13 Libor Běhounek, behounek@cs.cas.cz Lecture #1, October 15, 2013 Organizational matters Study materials will be posted
More informationACLT: Algebra, Categories, Logic in Topology - Grothendieck's generalized topological spaces (toposes)
ACLT: Algebra, Categories, Logic in Topology - Grothendieck's generalized topological spaces (toposes) Steve Vickers CS Theory Group Birmingham 2. Theories and models Categorical approach to many-sorted
More informationClassical First-Order Logic
Classical First-Order Logic Software Formal Verification Maria João Frade Departmento de Informática Universidade do Minho 2009/2010 Maria João Frade (DI-UM) First-Order Logic (Classical) MFES 2009/10
More informationGödel s Incompleteness Theorems
Seminar Report Gödel s Incompleteness Theorems Ahmet Aspir Mark Nardi 28.02.2018 Supervisor: Dr. Georg Moser Abstract Gödel s incompleteness theorems are very fundamental for mathematics and computational
More informationJanusz Czelakowski. B. h : Dom(h ) {T, F } (T -truth, F -falsehood); precisely: 1. If α Dom(h ), then. F otherwise.
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 3/2 (1974), pp. 31 35 reedition 2012 [original edition, pp. 31 37] Janusz Czelakowski LOGICS BASED ON PARTIAL BOOLEAN σ-algebras Let P = P ;, be the language with
More informationIntroduction to Logic in Computer Science: Autumn 2006
Introduction to Logic in Computer Science: Autumn 2006 Ulle Endriss Institute for Logic, Language and Computation University of Amsterdam Ulle Endriss 1 Plan for Today Today s class will be an introduction
More informationEquational Logic. Chapter Syntax Terms and Term Algebras
Chapter 2 Equational Logic 2.1 Syntax 2.1.1 Terms and Term Algebras The natural logic of algebra is equational logic, whose propositions are universally quantified identities between terms built up from
More informationA Speech Act Calculus
UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD A Speech Act Calculus A Pragmatised Natural Deduction Calculus and its Meta theory Moritz Cordes and Friedrich Reinmuth 18 July 2011 VERSION 2.0 Comments welcome! Building on the
More information1. Algebra H-B-M-S- <A, 0, 1,,,,,, >
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 17:3/4 (1988), pp. 127 133 reedition 2005 [original edition, pp. 127 137] Alexander S. Karpenko ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURE OF THE TRUTH-VALUES FOR L ω This paper is an
More informationThe predicate calculus is complete
The predicate calculus is complete Hans Halvorson The first thing we need to do is to precisify the inference rules UI and EE. To this end, we will use A(c) to denote a sentence containing the name c,
More informationModal logics: an introduction
Modal logics: an introduction Valentin Goranko DTU Informatics October 2010 Outline Non-classical logics in AI. Variety of modal logics. Brief historical remarks. Basic generic modal logic: syntax and
More informationINTRODUCTION TO PREDICATE LOGIC HUTH AND RYAN 2.1, 2.2, 2.4
INTRODUCTION TO PREDICATE LOGIC HUTH AND RYAN 2.1, 2.2, 2.4 Neil D. Jones DIKU 2005 Some slides today new, some based on logic 2004 (Nils Andersen), some based on kernebegreber (NJ 2005) PREDICATE LOGIC:
More informationPredicate Calculus - Syntax
Predicate Calculus - Syntax Lila Kari University of Waterloo Predicate Calculus - Syntax CS245, Logic and Computation 1 / 26 The language L pred of Predicate Calculus - Syntax L pred, the formal language
More informationProving Completeness for Nested Sequent Calculi 1
Proving Completeness for Nested Sequent Calculi 1 Melvin Fitting abstract. Proving the completeness of classical propositional logic by using maximal consistent sets is perhaps the most common method there
More informationThe Mother of All Paradoxes
The Mother of All Paradoxes Volker Halbach Truth and Intensionality Amsterdam 3rd December 2016 A theory of expressions The symbols of L are: 1. infinitely many variable symbols v 0, v 1, v 2, v 3,...
More informationThe non-logical symbols determine a specific F OL language and consists of the following sets. Σ = {Σ n } n<ω
1 Preliminaries In this chapter we first give a summary of the basic notations, terminology and results which will be used in this thesis. The treatment here is reduced to a list of definitions. For the
More informationA BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO TYPED PREDICATE LOGIC
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO TYPED PREDICATE LOGIC Raymond Turner December 6, 2010 Abstract Typed Predicate Logic 1 was developed to o er a unifying framework for many of the current logical systems, and especially
More informationHarmonious Logic: Craig s Interpolation Theorem and its Descendants. Solomon Feferman Stanford University
Harmonious Logic: Craig s Interpolation Theorem and its Descendants Solomon Feferman Stanford University http://math.stanford.edu/~feferman Interpolations Conference in Honor of William Craig 13 May 2007
More informationNON-ADJUNCTIVE DISCURSIVE LOGIC
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 42:3/4 (2013), pp. 169 181 Janusz Ciuciura NON-ADJUNCTIVE DISCURSIVE LOGIC Abstract The discursive logic is sometimes treated as an example of the so-called nonadjunctive
More informationProseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 An Algebraic Approach to Quantification and Lambda Abstraction: Fregean Interpretations 1
An Algebraic Approach to Quantification and Lambda Abstraction: Fregean Interpretations 1 (1) The Disambiguated Language Politics+λ Politics+λ is the disambiguated language γ {Concat,
More informationThe Square of Opposition in Orthomodular Logic
The Square of Opposition in Orthomodular Logic H. Freytes, C. de Ronde and G. Domenech Abstract. In Aristotelian logic, categorical propositions are divided in Universal Affirmative, Universal Negative,
More informationA Proof Theory for Generic Judgments
A Proof Theory for Generic Judgments Dale Miller INRIA/Futurs/Saclay and École Polytechnique Alwen Tiu École Polytechnique and Penn State University LICS 2003, Ottawa, Canada, 23 June 2003 Outline 1. Motivations
More informationLecture 9. Model theory. Consistency, independence, completeness, categoricity of axiom systems. Expanded with algebraic view.
V. Borschev and B. Partee, October 17-19, 2006 p. 1 Lecture 9. Model theory. Consistency, independence, completeness, categoricity of axiom systems. Expanded with algebraic view. CONTENTS 0. Syntax and
More informationIntroduction to first-order logic:
Introduction to first-order logic: First-order structures and languages. Terms and formulae in first-order logic. Interpretations, truth, validity, and satisfaction. Valentin Goranko DTU Informatics September
More informationFirst Order Logic (FOL) 1 znj/dm2017
First Order Logic (FOL) 1 http://lcs.ios.ac.cn/ znj/dm2017 Naijun Zhan March 19, 2017 1 Special thanks to Profs Hanpin Wang (PKU) and Lijun Zhang (ISCAS) for their courtesy of the slides on this course.
More information3. Only sequences that were formed by using finitely many applications of rules 1 and 2, are propositional formulas.
1 Chapter 1 Propositional Logic Mathematical logic studies correct thinking, correct deductions of statements from other statements. Let us make it more precise. A fundamental property of a statement is
More informationA Survey of Abstract Algebraic Logic
J. M. Font R. Jansana D. Pigozzi A Survey of Abstract Algebraic Logic Contents Introduction 14 1. The First Steps 16 1.1. Consequence operations and logics................ 17 1.2. Logical matrices..........................
More informationPropositional Logic Language
Propositional Logic Language A logic consists of: an alphabet A, a language L, i.e., a set of formulas, and a binary relation = between a set of formulas and a formula. An alphabet A consists of a finite
More informationHandout 3: PTQ Revisited (Muskens 1995, Ch. 4)
Handout 3: PTQ Revisited (Muskens 1995, Ch. 4) Semantics C (Spring 2010) Montague s PTQ article (Montague 1973), the paper in which he gave his Proper Treatment of Quantification, functions as the paradigm
More informationLecture 3: Semantics of Propositional Logic
Lecture 3: Semantics of Propositional Logic 1 Semantics of Propositional Logic Every language has two aspects: syntax and semantics. While syntax deals with the form or structure of the language, it is
More informationA Structuralist Account of Logic
Croatian Journal of Philosophy Vol. VIII, No. 23, 2008 Majda Trobok, Department of Philosophy University of Rijeka A Structuralist Account of Logic The lynch-pin of the structuralist account of logic endorsed
More informationNEW RESULTS IN LOGIC OF FORMULAS WHICH LOSE SENSE
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 14/3 (1985), pp. 114 119 reedition 2007 [original edition, pp. 114 121] Adam Morawiec Krystyna Piróg-Rzepecka NEW RESULTS IN LOGIC OF FORMULAS WHICH LOSE SENSE Abstract
More informationMathematical Logic. An Introduction
Mathematical Logic. An Introduction Summer 2006 by Peter Koepke Table of contents Table of contents............................................... 1 1 Introduction.................................................
More informationLing 130 Notes: Predicate Logic and Natural Deduction
Ling 130 Notes: Predicate Logic and Natural Deduction Sophia A. Malamud March 7, 2014 1 The syntax of Predicate (First-Order) Logic Besides keeping the connectives from Propositional Logic (PL), Predicate
More informationKLEENE LOGIC AND INFERENCE
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 4:1/2 (2014), pp. 4 2 Grzegorz Malinowski KLEENE LOGIC AND INFERENCE Abstract In the paper a distinguished three-valued construction by Kleene [2] is analyzed. The
More informationModel Theory of Modal Logic Lecture 1: A brief introduction to modal logic. Valentin Goranko Technical University of Denmark
Model Theory of Modal Logic Lecture 1: A brief introduction to modal logic Valentin Goranko Technical University of Denmark Third Indian School on Logic and its Applications Hyderabad, 25 January, 2010
More informationLecture 12. Statement Logic as a word algebra on the set of atomic statements. Lindenbaum algebra.
V. Borschev and B. Partee, October 26, 2006 p. 1 Lecture 12. Statement Logic as a word algebra on the set of atomic statements. Lindenbaum algebra. 0. Preliminary notes...1 1. Freedom for algebras. Word
More informationCanonical Calculi: Invertibility, Axiom expansion and (Non)-determinism
Canonical Calculi: Invertibility, Axiom expansion and (Non)-determinism A. Avron 1, A. Ciabattoni 2, and A. Zamansky 1 1 Tel-Aviv University 2 Vienna University of Technology Abstract. We apply the semantic
More informationIntroduction to Metalogic
Philosophy 135 Spring 2008 Tony Martin Introduction to Metalogic 1 The semantics of sentential logic. The language L of sentential logic. Symbols of L: Remarks: (i) sentence letters p 0, p 1, p 2,... (ii)
More informationProseminar on Semantic Theory Fall 2013 Ling 720 First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1
First Order (Predicate) Logic: Syntax and Natural Deduction 1 A Reminder of Our Plot I wish to provide some historical and intellectual context to the formal tools that logicians developed to study the
More informationMathematics 114L Spring 2018 D.A. Martin. Mathematical Logic
Mathematics 114L Spring 2018 D.A. Martin Mathematical Logic 1 First-Order Languages. Symbols. All first-order languages we consider will have the following symbols: (i) variables v 1, v 2, v 3,... ; (ii)
More informationFirst-Order Logic. 1 Syntax. Domain of Discourse. FO Vocabulary. Terms
First-Order Logic 1 Syntax Domain of Discourse The domain of discourse for first order logic is FO structures or models. A FO structure contains Relations Functions Constants (functions of arity 0) FO
More informationTABLEAU SYSTEM FOR LOGIC OF CATEGORIAL PROPOSITIONS AND DECIDABILITY
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 37:3/4 (2008), pp. 223 231 Tomasz Jarmużek TABLEAU SYSTEM FOR LOGIC OF CATEGORIAL PROPOSITIONS AND DECIDABILITY Abstract In the article we present an application
More informationOn rigid NL Lambek grammars inference from generalized functor-argument data
7 On rigid NL Lambek grammars inference from generalized functor-argument data Denis Béchet and Annie Foret Abstract This paper is concerned with the inference of categorial grammars, a context-free grammar
More informationSyntactic Characterisations in Model Theory
Department of Mathematics Bachelor Thesis (7.5 ECTS) Syntactic Characterisations in Model Theory Author: Dionijs van Tuijl Supervisor: Dr. Jaap van Oosten June 15, 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Preliminaries
More information6 Coalgebraic modalities via predicate liftings
6 Coalgebraic modalities via predicate liftings In this chapter we take an approach to coalgebraic modal logic where the modalities are in 1-1 correspondence with so-called predicate liftings for the functor
More informationA Logical Formulation of the Granular Data Model
2008 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops A Logical Formulation of the Granular Data Model Tuan-Fang Fan Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering National Penghu University
More informationMetainduction in Operational Set Theory
Metainduction in Operational Set Theory Luis E. Sanchis Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Syracuse University Syracuse, NY 13244-4100 Sanchis@top.cis.syr.edu http://www.cis.syr.edu/
More informationcis32-ai lecture # 18 mon-3-apr-2006
cis32-ai lecture # 18 mon-3-apr-2006 today s topics: propositional logic cis32-spring2006-sklar-lec18 1 Introduction Weak (search-based) problem-solving does not scale to real problems. To succeed, problem
More informationCHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION TO CLASSICAL PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC
CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION TO CLASSICAL PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC 1 Motivation and History The origins of the classical propositional logic, classical propositional calculus, as it was, and still often is called,
More informationKnowledge Representation and Reasoning in Modal Higher-order Logic
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Modal Higher-order Logic J.W. Lloyd Computer Sciences Laboratory College of Engineering and Computer Science The Australian National University August 23, 2007
More informationCompositionality Problems and How to Solve Them Thomas Ede Zimmermann, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Hyderabad CogSci Colloquium, March 09
Compositionality Problems and How to Solve Them Thomas Ede Zimmermann, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Hyderabad CogSci Colloquium, March 09 1. Compositionality Generalised Principle of Compositionality cf.
More informationOne-dimensional Fragment of First-order Logic
One-dimensional Fragment of First-order Logic Lauri Hella 1 School of Information Sciences University of Tampere Finland Antti Kuusisto 2 Institute of Computer Science University of Wroc law Poland Abstract
More informationcse541 LOGIC FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE
cse541 LOGIC FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE Professor Anita Wasilewska Spring 2015 LECTURE 2 Chapter 2 Introduction to Classical Propositional Logic PART 1: Classical Propositional Model Assumptions PART 2: Syntax
More information1 First-order logic. 1 Syntax of first-order logic. 2 Semantics of first-order logic. 3 First-order logic queries. 2 First-order query evaluation
Knowledge Bases and Databases Part 1: First-Order Queries Diego Calvanese Faculty of Computer Science Master of Science in Computer Science A.Y. 2007/2008 Overview of Part 1: First-order queries 1 First-order
More informationFirst-Order Logic. Chapter Overview Syntax
Chapter 10 First-Order Logic 10.1 Overview First-Order Logic is the calculus one usually has in mind when using the word logic. It is expressive enough for all of mathematics, except for those concepts
More informationQuasi-Boolean Encodings and Conditionals in Algebraic Specification
Quasi-Boolean Encodings and Conditionals in Algebraic Specification Răzvan Diaconescu Institute of Mathematics Simion Stoilow of the Romanian Academy Abstract We develop a general study of the algebraic
More informationAutomated Synthesis of Tableau Calculi
Automated Synthesis of Tableau Calculi Renate A. Schmidt 1 and Dmitry Tishkovsky 1 School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester Abstract This paper presents a method for synthesising sound
More information03 Review of First-Order Logic
CAS 734 Winter 2014 03 Review of First-Order Logic William M. Farmer Department of Computing and Software McMaster University 18 January 2014 What is First-Order Logic? First-order logic is the study of
More informationSyntax. Notation Throughout, and when not otherwise said, we assume a vocabulary V = C F P.
First-Order Logic Syntax The alphabet of a first-order language is organised into the following categories. Logical connectives:,,,,, and. Auxiliary symbols:.,,, ( and ). Variables: we assume a countable
More informationGeneralized Quantifiers Logical and Linguistic Aspects
Generalized Quantifiers Logical and Linguistic Aspects Lecture 1: Formal Semantics and Generalized Quantifiers Dag Westerståhl University of Gothenburg SELLC 2010 Institute for Logic and Cognition, Sun
More informationCOMP 409: Logic Homework 5
COMP 409: Logic Homework 5 Note: The pages below refer to the text from the book by Enderton. 1. Exercises 1-6 on p. 78. 1. Translate into this language the English sentences listed below. If the English
More informationPropositional and Predicate Logic - VII
Propositional and Predicate Logic - VII Petr Gregor KTIML MFF UK WS 2015/2016 Petr Gregor (KTIML MFF UK) Propositional and Predicate Logic - VII WS 2015/2016 1 / 11 Theory Validity in a theory A theory
More informationThe logic of perfect MV-algebras
The logic of perfect MV-algebras L. P. Belluce Department of Mathematics, British Columbia University, Vancouver, B.C. Canada. belluce@math.ubc.ca A. Di Nola DMI University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy adinola@unisa.it
More informationCS 514, Mathematics for Computer Science Mid-semester Exam, Autumn 2017 Department of Computer Science and Engineering IIT Guwahati
CS 514, Mathematics for Computer Science Mid-semester Exam, Autumn 2017 Department of Computer Science and Engineering IIT Guwahati Important 1. No questions about the paper will be entertained during
More informationRasiowa-Sikorski proof system for the non-fregean sentential logic SCI
Rasiowa-Sikorski proof system for the non-fregean sentential logic SCI Joanna Golińska-Pilarek National Institute of Telecommunications, Warsaw, J.Golinska-Pilarek@itl.waw.pl We will present complete and
More informationSeminar in Semantics: Gradation & Modality Winter 2014
1 Subject matter Seminar in Semantics: Gradation & Modality Winter 2014 Dan Lassiter 1/8/14 Handout: Basic Modal Logic and Kratzer (1977) [M]odality is the linguistic phenomenon whereby grammar allows
More informationTecniche di Verifica. Introduction to Propositional Logic
Tecniche di Verifica Introduction to Propositional Logic 1 Logic A formal logic is defined by its syntax and semantics. Syntax An alphabet is a set of symbols. A finite sequence of these symbols is called
More informationTopos Theory. Lectures 17-20: The interpretation of logic in categories. Olivia Caramello. Topos Theory. Olivia Caramello.
logic s Lectures 17-20: logic in 2 / 40 logic s Interpreting first-order logic in In Logic, first-order s are a wide class of formal s used for talking about structures of any kind (where the restriction
More informationReflexives and non-fregean quantifiers
UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, Theories of Everything Volume 17, Article 49: 439-445, 2012 Reflexives and non-fregean quantifiers Richard Zuber It is shown that depending on the subject noun phrase
More informationLogic for Computational Effects: work in progress
1 Logic for Computational Effects: work in progress Gordon Plotkin and John Power School of Informatics University of Edinburgh King s Buildings Mayfield Road Edinburgh EH9 3JZ Scotland gdp@inf.ed.ac.uk,
More informationFinal Exam (100 points)
Final Exam (100 points) Honor Code: Each question is worth 10 points. There is one bonus question worth 5 points. In contrast to the homework assignments, you may not collaborate on this final exam. You
More informationFirst Order Logic: Syntax and Semantics
CS1081 First Order Logic: Syntax and Semantics COMP30412 Sean Bechhofer sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk Problems Propositional logic isn t very expressive As an example, consider p = Scotland won on Saturday
More informationFregean Compositionality MCMP, June 2015 Thomas Ede Zimmermann (Goethe University, Frankfurt)
Fregean Compositionality MCMP, June 2015 Thomas Ede Zimmermann (Goethe University, Frankfurt) 1. Background (1a) John seeks a unicorn. P(Δ John, O(Δ seeks,δ a unicorn ) (c) Q(Δ a unicorn, Δ John seeks
More informationFirst-Order Modal Logic and the Barcan Formula
First-Order Modal Logic and the Barcan Formula Eric Pacuit Stanford University ai.stanford.edu/ epacuit March 10, 2009 Eric Pacuit: The Barcan Formula, 1 Plan 1. Background Neighborhood Semantics for Propositional
More information1. The Semantic Enterprise. 2. Semantic Values Intensions and Extensions. 3. Situations
Hardegree, Formal Semantics, Handout, 2015-02-03 1 of 8 1. The Semantic Enterprise The semantic-analysis of a phrase φ consists in the following. (1) providing a semantic-value for φ, and each of its component
More informationThe overlap algebra of regular opens
The overlap algebra of regular opens Francesco Ciraulo Giovanni Sambin Abstract Overlap algebras are complete lattices enriched with an extra primitive relation, called overlap. The new notion of overlap
More informationIntroduction to Temporal Logic. The purpose of temporal logics is to specify properties of dynamic systems. These can be either
Introduction to Temporal Logic The purpose of temporal logics is to specify properties of dynamic systems. These can be either Desired properites. Often liveness properties like In every infinite run action
More informationON THE AXIOMATIC SYSTEMS OF SYNTACTICALLY-CATEGORIAL LANGUAGES
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 13/4 (1984), pp. 241 249 reedition 2008 [original edition, pp. 241 251] Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska ON THE AXIOMATIC SYSTEMS OF SYNTACTICALLY-CATEGORIAL LANGUAGES
More information