Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 1 / Reny, 32

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 1 / Reny, 32"

Transcription

1 Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer Theory (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 1) Tsun-Feng Chiang* *School of Economics, Henan University, Kaifeng, China November 1, 2015 Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 1 / Reny, 32

2 1.3 The Consumer s Problem (Continued) Because the feasible set B is compact (closed and bounded), and the utilty function u(x) is a continuous real-valued function, by Theorem A1.10, there must exists a x that maximizes u(x). Moreover, because B is convex and the u(x) is assumed to be strictly quasiconcave, the x is unique. Because the preferences are strictly monotonic, the solution x will satisfy the budget constraint with equality, lying on, rather than inside, the boundary of the budget set (if a part of income y is not used, then he can improve his utility by using up to buy more commodity). A typical solution to this problem in the two-good case is illustrated in Figure (see the next slide). Clearly, the solution vector x depends on the parameters to the consumer s problem. We can view the solution of the consumer s problem x as a function for prices and income. Therefore, we will often write xi = x i (p, y), i = 1,, n, or in vector notation, x = x(p, y). Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 2 / Reny, 32

3 Figure 1.10 The solution to the consumer s utility-maximization problem. When viewed as functions of p and y, the solutions to the utility-maximization problem, x = x(p, y), are known as ordinary, or Marshallian demand functions. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 3 / Reny, 32

4 The relationship between the consumer s problem and consumer demand behavior is illustrated in Figure (see the next slide) In Figure 1.11(a), initially the consumer is endowed with income y and the prices for x 1 and x 2 are p1 0 and p0 2, respectively. Suppose the quantities x 1 (p1 0, p0 2, y) and x 2(p1 0, p0 2, y) solve the consumer s problem. Figure 1.11(b) illustrates the price of good 1, p 1 against the quantity of good 1, x 1. x 1 (p1 0, p0 2, y) is a point in Figure 1.11(b). Let the price of good 1 change from p1 0 to p1 1, where p1 1 < p0 1, now the solution becomes x 1 (p1 1, p0 2, y) and x 2(p1 1, p0 2, y). We can get another point x 1 (p1 1, p0 2, y) in the Figure 1.11(b). By considering all possible values for p 1, we trace out the consumer s entire demand curve x 1 (p 1, p2 0, y) for good 1 shown in Figure 1.11(b) given p 2 and y unchanged. As you can easily verify, different levels of income and different prices of good 2 will cause the position and shape of the demand curve for good 1 to change. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 4 / Reny, 32

5 Figure 1.11 The consumer s problem and consumer demand function Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 5 / Reny, 32

6 If it is further assumed that u(x) is differentiable, we can use calculus methods to further explore demand behavior. Recall that the consumer s problem is, max x R n + u(x), s.t. p x y As we ve noted, a solution x exists and is unique. To find x, first we form the Lagrangian, L(x, λ) = u(x) + λ[y p x] Assuming that the solution x is strictly positive, we can apply Kuhn-Tucker methods to characterize it. If x 0 solve this consumer s problem, then by Theorem A2.20, there exists a λ 0 such that (x, λ ) satisfy the following Kuhn-Tucker conditions: L = u(x ) λ p i = 0, i = 1,, n, x i x i y p x 0, λ [y p x ] = 0. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 6 / Reny, 32

7 Now, by strict monotonicity, the constraint reduce to have an equality form p x = y. Consequently, these conditions reduce to (Cons. 1) L = u(x ) λ p i = 0, i = 1,, n, x i x i y p x = 0. It is very likely u(x ) 0.Thus by strict monotonicity, u(x )/ x i > 0, for some i = 1,, n. From the first condition, we can see u(x ) x i = λ p i > 0 This says marginal utility is proportional to price for all goods at the optimum. Alternatively, for any two goods j and k, we can combine the first condition to conclude that MRS jk = u(x )/ x j u(x )/ x k = p j p k Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 7 / Reny, 32

8 This says at the optimum, the MRS between any two goods must be equal to the ratio of the goods prices. In a two-good case, this requires that the slope of the indifference curve through x be equal to the slope of the budget constraint, and that x lie on, rather than inside the budget line. In general, (Cons. 1) are merely necessary conditions for a local optimum. However, for the particular problem at hand, these necessary first-order conditions are in fact sufficient for a global optimum by the following theorem. Theorem 1.4 Sufficiency of Consumer s First-Order Conditions Suppose that u(x) is continuous and quasiconcave on R n +, and that (p, y) 0. If u is differentiable at x, and (x, λ ) 0 solve the (Cons. 1), then x solves the consumer s maximization problem at prices p and income y. Proof: For all x, x 1 0, because u is quasiconcave, u(x)(x 1 x) 0 whenever u(x 1 ) u(x) and u is differentiable at x. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 8 / Reny, 32

9 Theorem 1.4 (Continued) Suppose that u(x ) exists and (x, λ ) 0 solves (Cons. 1). Then u(x ) = λ p, (P.1) p x = y. (P.2) If x can t maximize u, there must be some x 0 0 such that u(x 0 ) > u(x ), p x 0 y. Multiply x 0 by t which is between 0 and 1, but also close enough to 1, the preceding inequalities imply that Let tx 0 = x 1, we then have u(tx 0 ) > u(x ), (P.3) p tx 0 <y. (P.4) Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 9 / Reny, 32

10 Theorem 1.4 (Continued) u(x )(x 1 x ) = (λ p) (x 1 x ) by (P.1) = λ (p x 1 p x ) < λ (y y) by (P.2) and (P.4) = 0 However, by (P.3), u(x 1 ) u(x ), u(x )(x 1 x ) < 0 contradicts the fact set forth at the beginning of the proof. Therefore, x is the utiiity-maximizer. With the sufficiency result in hand, it is enough to find a solution (x, λ ) 0 to (Cons. 1). Example 1.1 Given p 1, p 2 and y, find the solution for the consumer with the CES utility function u(x 1, x 2 ) = (x ρ 1 + x ρ 2 )1/ρ, where 0 ρ < 1. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 10 / Reny, 32

11 Example 1.1 (Continued) The consumer s problem is to find a nonnegative consumption bundle x 1, x 2 solving First form the Lagrangian: max x1,x 2 (x ρ 1 + x ρ 2 )1/ρ, s.t. p 1 x 1 + p 2 x 2 y L(x 1, x 2, λ) (x ρ 1 + x ρ 2 )1/ρ + λ(y p 1 x 1 p 2 x 2 ) Because preferences are monotonic, the budget constraint will hold with equality at the solution. The we have the following conditions which hold at the solution x 1, x 2 and λ: L x 1 = (x ρ 1 + x ρ 2 )(1/ρ) 1 x ρ 1 1 λp 1 = 0 Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 11 / Reny, 32

12 Example 1.1 (Continued) L x 2 = (x ρ 1 + x ρ 2 )(1/ρ) 1 x ρ 1 2 λp 2 = 0 L λ = y p 1x 1 p 2 x 2 = 0 There are three euqations and three unknowns (x 1, x 2, λ ), so we can solve the equation systems. For x 1 and x 2, x 1 = p 1/(ρ 1) 1 y p ρ/(ρ 1) 1 + p ρ/(ρ 1) 2 x2 p 1/(ρ 1) 2 y = p ρ/(ρ 1) 1 + p ρ/(ρ 1) 2 x1 and x 2, the solutions to the consumer s problem, are the consumer s Marshallian demand functions. If we define the parameter r = ρ/(ρ 1), we can simply x1 and x 2 as Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 12 / Reny, 32

13 Example 1.1 (Continued) x 1 (p, y) = pr 1 1 y p r 1 + pr 2 x 2 (p, y) = pr 1 2 y p r 1 + pr 2 Notice that the solutions to the consumers s problems depend only on its parameters, p 1, p 2 and y. Different prices and income will give different quantities of each good demanded. Usually we d like to be able to consider the slopes of demand curves and hence we d like the x(p, y) to be differentiable whenever we need it to be. The following theorem says under what conditions, the demand curve would be differentiable. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 13 / Reny, 32

14 Theorem 1.5 Differentiable Demand Let x 0 solve the consumer s maximization problem at prices p 0 0 and income y 0 > 0. If u is twice continuously differentiable on R n ++, u(x )/ x i > 0 for some i = 1,, n, and the bordered Hessian of u has a nonzero determinant at x, then x(p, y) is differentiable at (p 0, y 0 ). Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 14 / Reny, 32

15 1.4 Indirect Utility Function The utilty function, u(x), defined over the consumption set X and represents the consumer s preferences directly, is called the direct utility function. Given prices p and income y, the consumer chooses a utility-maximizing bundle x(p, y) which give the maximum utility. Different prices or income, giving different budget constraints, will generally give rise to different choices by the consumer and so to different level of maximizing utility. The relation among prices, income, and the maximized value of utility can be summarized by a real-valued function v : R n + R + R defined as follows: v(p, y) = max x R n + u(x) s.t. p x y. The function v(p, y) is called the indirect utility function. The maximum level of utility can be achieved when facing prices p and income y therefore will be that which is realized when x(p, y) is chosen. Hence, Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 15 / Reny, 32

16 v(p, y) = u(x(p, y)) (eq.1) Geometrically, we can think of v(p, y) as giving the utility level of the highest indifference curve the consumer can reach, given prices p and income y, as illustrated in Figure Figure 1.13 Indirect utility at prices p and income y. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 16 / Reny, 32

17 There are several properties that the indirect utility function will possess. First, according to the Theorem of the Maximum, the continuity of the constraint function in prices p and income y is sufficient to guarantee that v(p, y) will be continuous in p and y. In the following theorem, we collect together a number of additional properties of v(p, y). Theorem 1.6 Properties of the Indirect Utility Function 1 Continuous on R n + R +, 2 Homogeneous of degree zero in (p, y), 3 Strictly increasing in y, 4 Decreasing in p. Moreover, it satisfies 5 Quasiconvex in (p, y). 6 Roy s identity: If v(p, y) is differentiable at (p 0, y 0 ) is differentiable and (p, y)/ y 0, then Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 17 / Reny, 32

18 Theorem 1.6 (Continued) x i (p 0, y 0 ) = v(p, y)/ p i, i = 1,, n. v(p, y)/ y Proof: To prove the second property, we must show that v(p, y) = v(tp, ty) for all t > 0. By definition of the indirect utility function, v(tp, ty) = max x R n + u(x) s.t. tp x ty but the budget constraint does not change, which implies that v(tp, ty) = [max x R n + u(x) s.t. p x y] = v(p, y) Then we prove the third property. Remember that v(p, y) = max x R n + u(x) s.t. p x = y. (P.1) The Lagrangian for (P.1) is L(x, λ) = u(x) + λ(y p x) (P.2) Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 18 / Reny, 32

19 Theorem 1.6 (Continued) For the solutions (x, λ ) that solves (P.1), they must satisfy the first-order condition: L(x, λ ) x i = u(x ) x i λ p i = 0, i = 1,, n. (P.3) Since u(x )/ x i > 0 and p i > 0, λ > 0. According to the Envelope theorem (Theorem A2.21), the partial derivative of the maximum value function v(p, y) with respect to y is equal to the partial derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to y evaluated at (x, λ ), v(p, y) y = L(x, λ ) y = λ > 0 (P.4) Thus, v(p, y) is strictly increasing in y. Also, by the Envelope theorem, v(p, y) = L(x, λ ) = λ xi < 0 (P.5) p i p i Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 19 / Reny, 32

20 Theorem 1.6 (Continued) Thus, the fourth property is then proved. To prove the sixth property, we divide (P.5) by (P.4) and multiply the resulting equation by 1, which proves the Roy s identity. Example 1.2 v(p, y)/ p i v(p, y)/ y = x i = x i (p, y) In Example 1.1, the CES utility function u(x 1, x 2 ) = (x ρ 1 + x ρ 2 )1/ρ is a directly utility function. The corresponding demand functions are x 1 pr 1 1 y (p, y) = p1 r +, x pr 1 2 y pr 2 (p, y) = 2 p1 r +. pr 2 Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 20 / Reny, 32

21 Example 1.2 (Continued) By (eq.1), we can form the indirect utility function by substituting these back into the direct utility function. v(p, y) = [x 1 (p, y) ρ + x 2 (p, y) ρ ] 1/ρ = y(p r 1 + pr 2 ) 1/r It is easy to see that v(p, y) is homogeneous of degree zero in prices and income, because for any t > 0, v(tp, ty) = ty((tp 1 ) r + (tp 2 ) r ) 1/r = tyt 1 (p r 1 + pr 2 ) 1/r = v(p, y) To see that its increasing in y and decreasing in p. differentiate the indirect utility function with respect to income and any price to obtain v(p, y) y = (p r 1+p r 2) 1/r > 0, v(p, y) p i = (p r 1+p r 2) ( 1/r) 1 yp r 1 i < 0, i = 1, 2 To verify the Roy s identity, just form the required ratio and multiply it by 1, Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 21 / Reny, 32

22 Example 1.2 (Continued) [ ] v(p, y)/ pi ( 1) = ypr 1 i v(p, y)/ y p1 r + pr 2 = x i (p, y), i = 1, 2 Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 22 / Reny, 32

23 The Expenditure Function To construct the indirect utility function, we fixed market prices and income, and sought the maximum level of utility the consumer could achieve. To construct the expenditure function, we again fixed the prices, but we ask a different sort of question: What is the minimum level of money expenditure the consumer must make facing a given set of prices to achieve a given level of utility? To better understand this question, consider Figure 1.15 (see the next slide), a two-good case. The consumer faces the fixed utility u, now he has to choose a level of expenditure e that exactly achieve that much level of utility u. Since the price is fixed, the slope of each expenditure curve is the same. In constructing the expenditure function, we seek the minimum expenditure the consumer requires to achieve utility u. Clearly, that will be level e, and the least cost bundle that achieves utility u at prices p will be the bundle x h = (x1 h(p, u), x 2 h (p, u)), and the level of expenditure, or e(p, u) = p 1 x1 h(p, u) + p 2x2 h(p, u) = e. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 23 / Reny, 32

24 Figure 1.15 Finding the lowest level of expenditure to achieve utility level u More generally, we define the expenditure function as minimum-value function, e(p, u) min x R n + p x s.t. u(x) u (Prob.1) for all p 0 and all attainable utility levels u. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 24 / Reny, 32

25 Because p and x are positive, the set of numbers {e e = p x for some x with u(x) u} is bounded below by zero. Moreover, because p 0, the set is closed. Hence it contains a smallest number. The value e(p, u) is precisely this smallest number. We can denote the solution if the minimization problem as the function x h (p, u) 0. Notice also that if u(x) is continuous and strictly quasiconcave, the solution will be unique. As we ve seen, if x h (p, u) solves this problem, the lowest expenditure necessary to achieve utility u at prices p will be exactly equal to the cost of the bundle x h (p, u), or e(p, u) = p x h (p, u). x h (p, u) is also a demand function, but unobservable. Imagine a situation when the prices change. It could not keep the original consumption bundle given the original amount of income, so the consumer s utility level changes. To have the original, fixed level of utility, there should be income compensated to him to rebuild a new consumption bundle for this purpose. Therefore, x h (p, u) is called the compensated demand function which describes how quantity demands change with prices by keeping utility fixed. x h (p, u) is also Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 25 / Reny, 32

26 called Hicksian demand functions, named after John Hicks. Figure 1.16 (see the next slide). shows that when the price of good 1 changes, how do we sketch the Hicksian demand function. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 26 / Reny, 32

27 Figure 1.16 The Hicksian demand for good 1 Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 27 / Reny, 32

28 The following theorem describes the important properties of the expenditure function. Theorem 1.7 Properties of the Expenditure Function If u( ) is continuous and strictly increasing, then e(p, u) defined in (Prob.1) is 1 Zero when u takes on the lowest level of utility. 2 Continuous on its domain. 3 For all p 0, strictly increasing and unbounded above in u. 4 Increasing in p. 5 Homogeneous of degree 1 in p. 6 Concave in p. If, in addition, u( ) is strictly quasiconcave, we have, 7 Shephard s lemma: e(p, u) is differentiable in p at (p 0, u 0 ) with p 0 0, and Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 28 / Reny, 32

29 Theorem 1.7 (Continued) e(p 0, u 0 ) p i = x h i (p 0, u 0 ), i = 1,, n. Proof: To prove property 1, note that the lowest value of u is u(0). Consequently, e(p, u(0)) = 0 because x = 0 attains utility u(0) and requires an expenditure of p 0 = 0. Property 2 follows from the Theorem of Maximum. To prove property 3, we start from the consumer s minimization problem, e(p, u) min x R n + p x s.t. u(x)=u (P.1) Note the constraint is an equality. If the utility is not binding, there is always a cheaper consumption bundle achieving the same level of utility. Therefore, we can set up the Lagrangian for the problem Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 29 / Reny, 32

30 Theorem 1.7 (Continued) L(x, λ) = p x + λ[u u(x)]. (P.2) Suppose we have x = x h (p, u) 0 and λ be the solutions, then the following conditions must hold, L(x, λ ) x i = p i λ u(x ) x i = 0, i = 1,, n. (P.3) Note that because p i and u(x )/x i are positive, so, too is λ. By the Envelop theorem, the partial derivative of the minimum-value function e(p, u) with respect to u is equal to the partial derivative of the Lagrangian with respect to u, evaluated at (x, λ ). Hence, e(p, u) u = L(x, λ ) u = λ > 0 (strictly increasing in u) Skip the proof of unbounded above in u, but imagine utility can be unbounded so does the expenditure achieving that unlimited level of utility. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 30 / Reny, 32

31 Theorem 1.7 (Continued) To prove property 4, we again appeal to the Envelope theorem but now differentiate with respect to p i, e(p, u) = L(x, λ ) = xi xi h (p, u) 0 p i p i This also proves property 7. For property 5, multiply p by t > 0, thus e(tp, u) = min x R n + (tp) x = t min x R n + p x = t e(p, u) We skip the proof of property 6 by just give an intuition. When the price of x i, say goes up from pi 0 to pi 1, the consumer would not buy the same consumption bundle where x i = xi 0 to keep the utility. Instead he will buy less x i and more other goods relatively cheaper. In that case, the expenditure need not to increase by xi 0 (pi 1 pi 0 ), the maximum income compensation, but some smaller amount. Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 31 / Reny, 32

32 AD: Assistant Client: Dr. Wang, Qianqian Wage Rate: Negotiable Address: Week 7: The Consumer (Malinvaud, Chapter 2 and 4) / Consumer November Theory 1, 2015 (Jehle and 32 / Reny, 32

Week 9: Topics in Consumer Theory (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 2)

Week 9: Topics in Consumer Theory (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 2) Week 9: Topics in Consumer Theory (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 2) Tsun-Feng Chiang *School of Economics, Henan University, Kaifeng, China November 15, 2015 Microeconomic Theory Week 9: Topics in Consumer Theory

More information

Week 6: Consumer Theory Part 1 (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 1)

Week 6: Consumer Theory Part 1 (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 1) Week 6: Consumer Theory Part 1 (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 1) Tsun-Feng Chiang* *School of Economics, Henan University, Kaifeng, China November 2, 2014 1 / 28 Primitive Notions 1.1 Primitive Notions Consumer

More information

Notes on Consumer Theory

Notes on Consumer Theory Notes on Consumer Theory Alejandro Saporiti Alejandro Saporiti (Copyright) Consumer Theory 1 / 65 Consumer theory Reference: Jehle and Reny, Advanced Microeconomic Theory, 3rd ed., Pearson 2011: Ch. 1.

More information

Hicksian Demand and Expenditure Function Duality, Slutsky Equation

Hicksian Demand and Expenditure Function Duality, Slutsky Equation Hicksian Demand and Expenditure Function Duality, Slutsky Equation Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 6, September 14 Outline 1 Applications of Envelope Theorem 2 Hicksian Demand 3 Duality 4 Connections between

More information

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems The Fundamental Welfare Theorems The so-called Fundamental Welfare Theorems of Economics tell us about the relation between market equilibrium and Pareto efficiency. The First Welfare Theorem: Every Walrasian

More information

Consumer theory Topics in consumer theory. Microeconomics. Joana Pais. Fall Joana Pais

Consumer theory Topics in consumer theory. Microeconomics. Joana Pais. Fall Joana Pais Microeconomics Fall 2016 Indirect utility and expenditure Properties of consumer demand The indirect utility function The relationship among prices, incomes, and the maximised value of utility can be summarised

More information

Week 10: Theory of the Firm (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 3)

Week 10: Theory of the Firm (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 3) Week 10: Theory of the Firm (Jehle and Reny, Chapter 3) Tsun-Feng Chiang* *School of Economics, Henan University, Kaifeng, China November 22, 2015 First Last (shortinst) Short title November 22, 2015 1

More information

Econ 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics

Econ 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics Econ 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics Dirk Bergemann, Spring 2012 Week of 1/29-2/4 1 Lecture 7: Expenditure Minimization Instead of maximizing utility subject to a given income we can also minimize expenditure

More information

Utility Maximization Problem

Utility Maximization Problem Demand Theory Utility Maximization Problem Consumer maximizes his utility level by selecting a bundle x (where x can be a vector) subject to his budget constraint: max x 0 u(x) s. t. p x w Weierstrass

More information

Week 3: Sets and Mappings/Calculus and Optimization (Jehle September and Reny, 20, 2015 Chapter A1/A2)

Week 3: Sets and Mappings/Calculus and Optimization (Jehle September and Reny, 20, 2015 Chapter A1/A2) Week 3: Sets and Mappings/Calculus and Optimization (Jehle and Reny, Chapter A1/A2) Tsun-Feng Chiang *School of Economics, Henan University, Kaifeng, China September 20, 2015 Week 3: Sets and Mappings/Calculus

More information

Recitation 2-09/01/2017 (Solution)

Recitation 2-09/01/2017 (Solution) Recitation 2-09/01/2017 (Solution) 1. Checking properties of the Cobb-Douglas utility function. Consider the utility function u(x) Y n i1 x i i ; where x denotes a vector of n di erent goods x 2 R n +,

More information

Microeconomics. Joana Pais. Fall Joana Pais

Microeconomics. Joana Pais. Fall Joana Pais Microeconomics Fall 2016 Primitive notions There are four building blocks in any model of consumer choice. They are the consumption set, the feasible set, the preference relation, and the behavioural assumption.

More information

GS/ECON 5010 section B Answers to Assignment 1 September Q1. Are the preferences described below transitive? Strictly monotonic? Convex?

GS/ECON 5010 section B Answers to Assignment 1 September Q1. Are the preferences described below transitive? Strictly monotonic? Convex? GS/ECON 5010 section B Answers to Assignment 1 September 2011 Q1. Are the preferences described below transitive? Strictly monotonic? Convex? Explain briefly. The person consumes 2 goods, food and clothing.

More information

Advanced Microeconomics I: Consumers, Firms and Markets Chapters 1+2

Advanced Microeconomics I: Consumers, Firms and Markets Chapters 1+2 Advanced Microeconomics I: Consumers, Firms and Markets Chapters 1+2 Prof. Dr. Oliver Gürtler Winter Term 2012/2013 1 Advanced Microeconomics I: Consumers, Firms and Markets Chapters 1+2 JJ N J 1. Introduction

More information

Solutions to selected exercises from Jehle and Reny (2001): Advanced Microeconomic Theory

Solutions to selected exercises from Jehle and Reny (2001): Advanced Microeconomic Theory Solutions to selected exercises from Jehle and Reny (001): Advanced Microeconomic Theory Thomas Herzfeld September 010 Contents 1 Mathematical Appendix 1.1 Chapter A1..................................

More information

Competitive Consumer Demand 1

Competitive Consumer Demand 1 John Nachbar Washington University May 7, 2017 1 Introduction. Competitive Consumer Demand 1 These notes sketch out the basic elements of competitive demand theory. The main result is the Slutsky Decomposition

More information

Duality. for The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. Lawrence E. Blume

Duality. for The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. Lawrence E. Blume Duality for The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd ed. Lawrence E. Blume Headwords: CONVEXITY, DUALITY, LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS, PARETO EFFICIENCY, QUASI-CONCAVITY 1 Introduction The word duality is

More information

i) This is simply an application of Berge s Maximum Theorem, but it is actually not too difficult to prove the result directly.

i) This is simply an application of Berge s Maximum Theorem, but it is actually not too difficult to prove the result directly. Bocconi University PhD in Economics - Microeconomics I Prof. M. Messner Problem Set 3 - Solution Problem 1: i) This is simply an application of Berge s Maximum Theorem, but it is actually not too difficult

More information

Notes I Classical Demand Theory: Review of Important Concepts

Notes I Classical Demand Theory: Review of Important Concepts Notes I Classical Demand Theory: Review of Important Concepts The notes for our course are based on: Mas-Colell, A., M.D. Whinston and J.R. Green (1995), Microeconomic Theory, New York and Oxford: Oxford

More information

Problem set 2 solutions Prof. Justin Marion Econ 100M Winter 2012

Problem set 2 solutions Prof. Justin Marion Econ 100M Winter 2012 Problem set 2 solutions Prof. Justin Marion Econ 100M Winter 2012 1. I+S effects Recognize that the utility function U =min{2x 1,4x 2 } represents perfect complements, and that the goods will be consumed

More information

Recitation #2 (August 31st, 2018)

Recitation #2 (August 31st, 2018) Recitation #2 (August 1st, 2018) 1. [Checking properties of the Cobb-Douglas utility function.] Consider the utility function u(x) = n i=1 xα i i, where x denotes a vector of n different goods x R n +,

More information

Microeconomics II Lecture 4. Marshallian and Hicksian demands for goods with an endowment (Labour supply)

Microeconomics II Lecture 4. Marshallian and Hicksian demands for goods with an endowment (Labour supply) Leonardo Felli 30 October, 2002 Microeconomics II Lecture 4 Marshallian and Hicksian demands for goods with an endowment (Labour supply) Define M = m + p ω to be the endowment of the consumer. The Marshallian

More information

Week 4: Calculus and Optimization (Jehle and Reny, Chapter A2)

Week 4: Calculus and Optimization (Jehle and Reny, Chapter A2) Week 4: Calculus and Optimization (Jehle and Reny, Chapter A2) Tsun-Feng Chiang *School of Economics, Henan University, Kaifeng, China September 27, 2015 Microeconomic Theory Week 4: Calculus and Optimization

More information

GARP and Afriat s Theorem Production

GARP and Afriat s Theorem Production GARP and Afriat s Theorem Production Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 8, September 21 Outline 1 Generalized Axiom of Revealed Preferences 2 Afriat s Theorem 3 Production Sets and Production Functions 4 Profits

More information

Maximum Value Functions and the Envelope Theorem

Maximum Value Functions and the Envelope Theorem Lecture Notes for ECON 40 Kevin Wainwright Maximum Value Functions and the Envelope Theorem A maximum (or minimum) value function is an objective function where the choice variables have been assigned

More information

Utility Maximization Problem. Advanced Microeconomic Theory 2

Utility Maximization Problem. Advanced Microeconomic Theory 2 Demand Theory Utility Maximization Problem Advanced Microeconomic Theory 2 Utility Maximization Problem Consumer maximizes his utility level by selecting a bundle x (where x can be a vector) subject to

More information

Final Examination with Answers: Economics 210A

Final Examination with Answers: Economics 210A Final Examination with Answers: Economics 210A December, 2016, Ted Bergstrom, UCSB I asked students to try to answer any 7 of the 8 questions. I intended the exam to have some relatively easy parts and

More information

Lecture 1. History of general equilibrium theory

Lecture 1. History of general equilibrium theory Lecture 1 History of general equilibrium theory Adam Smith: The Wealth of Nations, 1776 many heterogeneous individuals with diverging interests many voluntary but uncoordinated actions (trades) results

More information

Properties of Walrasian Demand

Properties of Walrasian Demand Properties of Walrasian Demand Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 5, September 12 Problem Set 2 is due in Kelly s mailbox by 5pm today Outline 1 Properties of Walrasian Demand 2 Indirect Utility Function 3 Envelope

More information

Seminars on Mathematics for Economics and Finance Topic 5: Optimization Kuhn-Tucker conditions for problems with inequality constraints 1

Seminars on Mathematics for Economics and Finance Topic 5: Optimization Kuhn-Tucker conditions for problems with inequality constraints 1 Seminars on Mathematics for Economics and Finance Topic 5: Optimization Kuhn-Tucker conditions for problems with inequality constraints 1 Session: 15 Aug 2015 (Mon), 10:00am 1:00pm I. Optimization with

More information

The Ohio State University Department of Economics. Homework Set Questions and Answers

The Ohio State University Department of Economics. Homework Set Questions and Answers The Ohio State University Department of Economics Econ. 805 Winter 00 Prof. James Peck Homework Set Questions and Answers. Consider the following pure exchange economy with two consumers and two goods.

More information

Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 2: Demand Theory

Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Chapter 2: Demand Theory Advanced Microeconomic Theory Chapter 2: Demand Theory Outline Utility maximization problem (UMP) Walrasian demand and indirect utility function WARP and Walrasian demand Income and substitution effects

More information

Economics 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics Midterm Suggested Solutions 2/8/ (a) The equation of the indifference curve is given by,

Economics 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics Midterm Suggested Solutions 2/8/ (a) The equation of the indifference curve is given by, Dirk Bergemann Department of Economics Yale University Economics 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics Midterm Suggested Solutions 2/8/12 1. (a) The equation of the indifference curve is given by, (x 1 + 2)

More information

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6 Advanced Microeconomic Analysis, Lecture 6 Prof. Ronaldo CARPIO April 10, 017 Administrative Stuff Homework # is due at the end of class. I will post the solutions on the website later today. The midterm

More information

Microeconomic Theory: Lecture 2 Choice Theory and Consumer Demand

Microeconomic Theory: Lecture 2 Choice Theory and Consumer Demand Microeconomic Theory: Lecture 2 Choice Theory and Consumer Demand Summer Semester, 2014 De nitions and Axioms Binary Relations I Examples: taller than, friend of, loves, hates, etc. I Abstract formulation:

More information

CONSUMER DEMAND. Consumer Demand

CONSUMER DEMAND. Consumer Demand CONSUMER DEMAND KENNETH R. DRIESSEL Consumer Demand The most basic unit in microeconomics is the consumer. In this section we discuss the consumer optimization problem: The consumer has limited wealth

More information

Structural Properties of Utility Functions Walrasian Demand

Structural Properties of Utility Functions Walrasian Demand Structural Properties of Utility Functions Walrasian Demand Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Lecture 4, September 7 Outline 1 Structural Properties of Utility Functions 1 Local Non Satiation 2 Convexity 3 Quasi-linearity

More information

Chapter 4. Maximum Theorem, Implicit Function Theorem and Envelope Theorem

Chapter 4. Maximum Theorem, Implicit Function Theorem and Envelope Theorem Chapter 4. Maximum Theorem, Implicit Function Theorem and Envelope Theorem This chapter will cover three key theorems: the maximum theorem (or the theorem of maximum), the implicit function theorem, and

More information

Microeconomic Theory -1- Introduction

Microeconomic Theory -1- Introduction Microeconomic Theory -- Introduction. Introduction. Profit maximizing firm with monopoly power 6 3. General results on maximizing with two variables 8 4. Model of a private ownership economy 5. Consumer

More information

Microeconomics, Block I Part 1

Microeconomics, Block I Part 1 Microeconomics, Block I Part 1 Piero Gottardi EUI Sept. 26, 2016 Piero Gottardi (EUI) Microeconomics, Block I Part 1 Sept. 26, 2016 1 / 53 Choice Theory Set of alternatives: X, with generic elements x,

More information

Applications I: consumer theory

Applications I: consumer theory Applications I: consumer theory Lecture note 8 Outline 1. Preferences to utility 2. Utility to demand 3. Fully worked example 1 From preferences to utility The preference ordering We start by assuming

More information

Consumer Theory. Ichiro Obara. October 8, 2012 UCLA. Obara (UCLA) Consumer Theory October 8, / 51

Consumer Theory. Ichiro Obara. October 8, 2012 UCLA. Obara (UCLA) Consumer Theory October 8, / 51 Consumer Theory Ichiro Obara UCLA October 8, 2012 Obara (UCLA) Consumer Theory October 8, 2012 1 / 51 Utility Maximization Utility Maximization Obara (UCLA) Consumer Theory October 8, 2012 2 / 51 Utility

More information

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis Solutions to Midterm Exam

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis Solutions to Midterm Exam Advanced Microeconomic Analsis Solutions to Midterm Exam Q1. (0 pts) An individual consumes two goods x 1 x and his utilit function is: u(x 1 x ) = [min(x 1 + x x 1 + x )] (a) Draw some indifference curves

More information

Midterm #1 EconS 527 Wednesday, February 21st, 2018

Midterm #1 EconS 527 Wednesday, February 21st, 2018 NAME: Midterm #1 EconS 527 Wednesday, February 21st, 2018 Instructions. Show all your work clearly and make sure you justify all your answers. 1. Question 1 [10 Points]. Discuss and provide examples of

More information

E 600 Chapter 4: Optimization

E 600 Chapter 4: Optimization E 600 Chapter 4: Optimization Simona Helmsmueller August 8, 2018 Goals of this lecture: Every theorem in these slides is important! You should understand, remember and be able to apply each and every one

More information

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis Solutions to Homework #2

Advanced Microeconomic Analysis Solutions to Homework #2 Advanced Microeconomic Analysis Solutions to Homework #2 0..4 Prove that Hicksian demands are homogeneous of degree 0 in prices. We use the relationship between Hicksian and Marshallian demands: x h i

More information

Lakehead University ECON 4117/5111 Mathematical Economics Fall 2002

Lakehead University ECON 4117/5111 Mathematical Economics Fall 2002 Test 1 September 20, 2002 1. Determine whether each of the following is a statement or not (answer yes or no): (a) Some sentences can be labelled true and false. (b) All students should study mathematics.

More information

Chapter 1 Consumer Theory Part II

Chapter 1 Consumer Theory Part II Chapter 1 Consumer Theory Part II Economics 5113 Microeconomic Theory Kam Yu Winter 2018 Outline 1 Introduction to Duality Theory Indirect Utility and Expenditure Functions Ordinary and Compensated Demand

More information

Demand Theory. Lecture IX and X Utility Maximization (Varian Ch. 7) Federico Trionfetti

Demand Theory. Lecture IX and X Utility Maximization (Varian Ch. 7) Federico Trionfetti Demand Theory Lecture IX and X Utility Maximization (Varian Ch. 7) Federico Trionfetti Aix-Marseille Université Faculté d Economie et Gestion Aix-Marseille School of Economics October 5, 2018 Table of

More information

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems

The Fundamental Welfare Theorems The Fundamental Welfare Theorems The so-called Fundamental Welfare Theorems of Economics tell us about the relation between market equilibrium and Pareto efficiency. The First Welfare Theorem: Every Walrasian

More information

Second Welfare Theorem

Second Welfare Theorem Second Welfare Theorem Econ 2100 Fall 2015 Lecture 18, November 2 Outline 1 Second Welfare Theorem From Last Class We want to state a prove a theorem that says that any Pareto optimal allocation is (part

More information

Last Revised: :19: (Fri, 12 Jan 2007)(Revision:

Last Revised: :19: (Fri, 12 Jan 2007)(Revision: 0-0 1 Demand Lecture Last Revised: 2007-01-12 16:19:03-0800 (Fri, 12 Jan 2007)(Revision: 67) a demand correspondence is a special kind of choice correspondence where the set of alternatives is X = { x

More information

Microeconomics I. September, c Leopold Sögner

Microeconomics I. September, c Leopold Sögner Microeconomics I c Leopold Sögner Department of Economics and Finance Institute for Advanced Studies Stumpergasse 56 1060 Wien Tel: +43-1-59991 182 soegner@ihs.ac.at http://www.ihs.ac.at/ soegner September,

More information

EC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 2

EC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 2 EC487 Advanced Microeconomics, Part I: Lecture 2 Leonardo Felli 32L.LG.04 6 October, 2017 Properties of the Profit Function Recall the following property of the profit function π(p, w) = max x p f (x)

More information

Mathematical Economics: Lecture 16

Mathematical Economics: Lecture 16 Mathematical Economics: Lecture 16 Yu Ren WISE, Xiamen University November 26, 2012 Outline 1 Chapter 21: Concave and Quasiconcave Functions New Section Chapter 21: Concave and Quasiconcave Functions Concave

More information

Final Exam - Math Camp August 27, 2014

Final Exam - Math Camp August 27, 2014 Final Exam - Math Camp August 27, 2014 You will have three hours to complete this exam. Please write your solution to question one in blue book 1 and your solutions to the subsequent questions in blue

More information

Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework.

Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework. Introduction to General Equilibrium: Framework. Economy: I consumers, i = 1,...I. J firms, j = 1,...J. L goods, l = 1,...L Initial Endowment of good l in the economy: ω l 0, l = 1,...L. Consumer i : preferences

More information

The general programming problem is the nonlinear programming problem where a given function is maximized subject to a set of inequality constraints.

The general programming problem is the nonlinear programming problem where a given function is maximized subject to a set of inequality constraints. 1 Optimization Mathematical programming refers to the basic mathematical problem of finding a maximum to a function, f, subject to some constraints. 1 In other words, the objective is to find a point,

More information

Preferences and Utility

Preferences and Utility Preferences and Utility How can we formally describe an individual s preference for different amounts of a good? How can we represent his preference for a particular list of goods (a bundle) over another?

More information

Economics 101. Lecture 2 - The Walrasian Model and Consumer Choice

Economics 101. Lecture 2 - The Walrasian Model and Consumer Choice Economics 101 Lecture 2 - The Walrasian Model and Consumer Choice 1 Uncle Léon The canonical model of exchange in economics is sometimes referred to as the Walrasian Model, after the early economist Léon

More information

Rice University. Answer Key to Mid-Semester Examination Fall ECON 501: Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Part A

Rice University. Answer Key to Mid-Semester Examination Fall ECON 501: Advanced Microeconomic Theory. Part A Rice University Answer Key to Mid-Semester Examination Fall 006 ECON 50: Advanced Microeconomic Theory Part A. Consider the following expenditure function. e (p ; p ; p 3 ; u) = (p + p ) u + p 3 State

More information

Lecture Notes for Chapter 12

Lecture Notes for Chapter 12 Lecture Notes for Chapter 12 Kevin Wainwright April 26, 2014 1 Constrained Optimization Consider the following Utility Max problem: Max x 1, x 2 U = U(x 1, x 2 ) (1) Subject to: Re-write Eq. 2 B = P 1

More information

Mathematical Foundations -1- Constrained Optimization. Constrained Optimization. An intuitive approach 2. First Order Conditions (FOC) 7

Mathematical Foundations -1- Constrained Optimization. Constrained Optimization. An intuitive approach 2. First Order Conditions (FOC) 7 Mathematical Foundations -- Constrained Optimization Constrained Optimization An intuitive approach First Order Conditions (FOC) 7 Constraint qualifications 9 Formal statement of the FOC for a maximum

More information

1 General Equilibrium

1 General Equilibrium 1 General Equilibrium 1.1 Pure Exchange Economy goods, consumers agent : preferences < or utility : R + R initial endowments, R + consumption bundle, =( 1 ) R + Definition 1 An allocation, =( 1 ) is feasible

More information

EC /11. Math for Microeconomics September Course, Part II Lecture Notes. Course Outline

EC /11. Math for Microeconomics September Course, Part II Lecture Notes. Course Outline LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Professor Leonardo Felli Department of Economics S.478; x7525 EC400 20010/11 Math for Microeconomics September Course, Part II Lecture Notes Course Outline Lecture 1: Tools for

More information

Week 5 Consumer Theory (Jehle and Reny, Ch.2)

Week 5 Consumer Theory (Jehle and Reny, Ch.2) Week 5 Consumer Theory (Jehle and Reny, Ch.2) Serçin ahin Yldz Technical University 23 October 2012 Duality Expenditure and Consumer Preferences Choose (p 0, u 0 ) R n ++ R +, and evaluate E there to obtain

More information

Problem Set 5: Expenditure Minimization, Duality, and Welfare 1. Suppose you were given the following expenditure function: β (α

Problem Set 5: Expenditure Minimization, Duality, and Welfare 1. Suppose you were given the following expenditure function: β (α Problem Set 5: Expenditure Minimization, Duality, and Welfare. Suppose you were given the following expenditure function: ) ep,ū) = ūp p where 0

More information

where u is the decision-maker s payoff function over her actions and S is the set of her feasible actions.

where u is the decision-maker s payoff function over her actions and S is the set of her feasible actions. Seminars on Mathematics for Economics and Finance Topic 3: Optimization - interior optima 1 Session: 11-12 Aug 2015 (Thu/Fri) 10:00am 1:00pm I. Optimization: introduction Decision-makers (e.g. consumers,

More information

Notes on General Equilibrium

Notes on General Equilibrium Notes on General Equilibrium Alejandro Saporiti Alejandro Saporiti (Copyright) General Equilibrium 1 / 42 General equilibrium Reference: Jehle and Reny, Advanced Microeconomic Theory, 3rd ed., Pearson

More information

Midterm Examination: Economics 210A October 2011

Midterm Examination: Economics 210A October 2011 Midterm Examination: Economics 210A October 2011 The exam has 6 questions. Answer as many as you can. Good luck. 1) A) Must every quasi-concave function must be concave? If so, prove it. If not, provide

More information

Generalized Convexity in Economics

Generalized Convexity in Economics Generalized Convexity in Economics J.E. Martínez-Legaz Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain 2nd Summer School: Generalized Convexity Analysis Introduction to Theory and Applications JULY 19, 2008 KAOHSIUNG

More information

The Kuhn-Tucker Problem

The Kuhn-Tucker Problem Natalia Lazzati Mathematics for Economics (Part I) Note 8: Nonlinear Programming - The Kuhn-Tucker Problem Note 8 is based on de la Fuente (2000, Ch. 7) and Simon and Blume (1994, Ch. 18 and 19). The Kuhn-Tucker

More information

Midterm Exam, Econ 210A, Fall 2008

Midterm Exam, Econ 210A, Fall 2008 Midterm Exam, Econ 0A, Fall 008 ) Elmer Kink s utility function is min{x, x }. Draw a few indifference curves for Elmer. These are L-shaped, with the corners lying on the line x = x. Find each of the following

More information

Risk Aversion over Incomes and Risk Aversion over Commodities. By Juan E. Martinez-Legaz and John K.-H. Quah 1

Risk Aversion over Incomes and Risk Aversion over Commodities. By Juan E. Martinez-Legaz and John K.-H. Quah 1 Risk Aversion over Incomes and Risk Aversion over Commodities By Juan E. Martinez-Legaz and John K.-H. Quah 1 Abstract: This note determines the precise connection between an agent s attitude towards income

More information

EC /11. Math for Microeconomics September Course, Part II Problem Set 1 with Solutions. a11 a 12. x 2

EC /11. Math for Microeconomics September Course, Part II Problem Set 1 with Solutions. a11 a 12. x 2 LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Professor Leonardo Felli Department of Economics S.478; x7525 EC400 2010/11 Math for Microeconomics September Course, Part II Problem Set 1 with Solutions 1. Show that the general

More information

Week 1: Conceptual Framework of Microeconomic theory (Malivaud, September Chapter 6, 20151) / Mathemat 1 / 25. (Jehle and Reny, Chapter A1)

Week 1: Conceptual Framework of Microeconomic theory (Malivaud, September Chapter 6, 20151) / Mathemat 1 / 25. (Jehle and Reny, Chapter A1) Week 1: Conceptual Framework of Microeconomic theory (Malivaud, Chapter 1) / Mathematic Tools (Jehle and Reny, Chapter A1) Tsun-Feng Chiang *School of Economics, Henan University, Kaifeng, China September

More information

Revealed Preferences and Utility Functions

Revealed Preferences and Utility Functions Revealed Preferences and Utility Functions Lecture 2, 1 September Econ 2100 Fall 2017 Outline 1 Weak Axiom of Revealed Preference 2 Equivalence between Axioms and Rationalizable Choices. 3 An Application:

More information

Lecture Notes October 18, Reading assignment for this lecture: Syllabus, section I.

Lecture Notes October 18, Reading assignment for this lecture: Syllabus, section I. Lecture Notes October 18, 2012 Reading assignment for this lecture: Syllabus, section I. Economic General Equilibrium Partial and General Economic Equilibrium PARTIAL EQUILIBRIUM S k (p o ) = D k k (po

More information

Microeconomic Theory-I Washington State University Midterm Exam #1 - Answer key. Fall 2016

Microeconomic Theory-I Washington State University Midterm Exam #1 - Answer key. Fall 2016 Microeconomic Theory-I Washington State University Midterm Exam # - Answer key Fall 06. [Checking properties of preference relations]. Consider the following preference relation de ned in the positive

More information

The Kuhn-Tucker and Envelope Theorems

The Kuhn-Tucker and Envelope Theorems The Kuhn-Tucker and Envelope Theorems Peter Ireland EC720.01 - Math for Economists Boston College, Department of Economics Fall 2010 The Kuhn-Tucker and envelope theorems can be used to characterize the

More information

x 1 1 and p 1 1 Two points if you just talk about monotonicity (u (c) > 0).

x 1 1 and p 1 1 Two points if you just talk about monotonicity (u (c) > 0). . (a) (8 points) What does it mean for observations x and p... x T and p T to be rationalized by a monotone utility function? Notice that this is a one good economy. For all t, p t x t function. p t x

More information

3. Neoclassical Demand Theory. 3.1 Preferences

3. Neoclassical Demand Theory. 3.1 Preferences EC 701, Fall 2005, Microeconomic Theory September 28, 2005 page 81 3. Neoclassical Demand Theory 3.1 Preferences Not all preferences can be described by utility functions. This is inconvenient. We make

More information

Introduction to General Equilibrium

Introduction to General Equilibrium Introduction to General Equilibrium Juan Manuel Puerta November 6, 2009 Introduction So far we discussed markets in isolation. We studied the quantities and welfare that results under different assumptions

More information

1 + x 1/2. b) For what values of k is g a quasi-concave function? For what values of k is g a concave function? Explain your answers.

1 + x 1/2. b) For what values of k is g a quasi-concave function? For what values of k is g a concave function? Explain your answers. Questions and Answers from Econ 0A Final: Fall 008 I have gone to some trouble to explain the answers to all of these questions, because I think that there is much to be learned b working through them

More information

PhD Qualifier Examination

PhD Qualifier Examination PhD Qualifier Examination Department of Agricultural Economics July 26, 2013 Instructions The exam consists of six questions. You must answer all questions. If you need an assumption to complete a question,

More information

1.3 The Indirect Utility Function

1.3 The Indirect Utility Function 1.2 Utility Maximization Problem (UMP) (MWG 2.D, 2.E; Kreps 2.2) max u (x) s.t. p.x w and x 0 hx Xi For a cts preference relation represented by a cts utility fn, u ( ): 1. The UMP has at least one solution

More information

Economics th April 2011

Economics th April 2011 Economics 401 8th April 2011 Instructions: Answer 7 of the following 9 questions. All questions are of equal weight. Indicate clearly on the first page which questions you want marked. 1. Answer both parts.

More information

Econ Slides from Lecture 14

Econ Slides from Lecture 14 Econ 205 Sobel Econ 205 - Slides from Lecture 14 Joel Sobel September 10, 2010 Theorem ( Lagrange Multipliers ) Theorem If x solves max f (x) subject to G(x) = 0 then there exists λ such that Df (x ) =

More information

Econ 5150: Applied Econometrics Empirical Demand Analysis. Sung Y. Park CUHK

Econ 5150: Applied Econometrics Empirical Demand Analysis. Sung Y. Park CUHK Econ 5150: Applied Econometrics Empirical Analysis Sung Y. Park CUHK Marshallian demand Under some mild regularity conditions on preferences the preference relation x ર z ( the bundle x us weakly preferred

More information

MSc Economics: Economic Theory and Applications I. Consumer Theory

MSc Economics: Economic Theory and Applications I. Consumer Theory MSc Economics: Economic Theory and Applications I Consumer Theory Dr Ken Hori Birkbeck College Autumn 2006 1 1 Utility Max Problem Basic hypothesis: a rational consumer will always choose a most preferred

More information

September Math Course: First Order Derivative

September Math Course: First Order Derivative September Math Course: First Order Derivative Arina Nikandrova Functions Function y = f (x), where x is either be a scalar or a vector of several variables (x,..., x n ), can be thought of as a rule which

More information

ON BEHAVIORAL COMPLEMENTARITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS

ON BEHAVIORAL COMPLEMENTARITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON BEHAVIORAL COMPLEMENTARITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS CHRISTOPHER P. CHAMBERS, FEDERICO ECHENIQUE, AND ERAN SHMAYA Abstract. We study the behavioral definition of complementary goods: if the price of one

More information

Economics 501B Final Exam Fall 2017 Solutions

Economics 501B Final Exam Fall 2017 Solutions Economics 501B Final Exam Fall 2017 Solutions 1. For each of the following propositions, state whether the proposition is true or false. If true, provide a proof (or at least indicate how a proof could

More information

CHAPTER 2: CONVEX SETS AND CONCAVE FUNCTIONS. W. Erwin Diewert January 31, 2008.

CHAPTER 2: CONVEX SETS AND CONCAVE FUNCTIONS. W. Erwin Diewert January 31, 2008. 1 ECONOMICS 594: LECTURE NOTES CHAPTER 2: CONVEX SETS AND CONCAVE FUNCTIONS W. Erwin Diewert January 31, 2008. 1. Introduction Many economic problems have the following structure: (i) a linear function

More information

Mathematical Preliminaries for Microeconomics: Exercises

Mathematical Preliminaries for Microeconomics: Exercises Mathematical Preliminaries for Microeconomics: Exercises Igor Letina 1 Universität Zürich Fall 2013 1 Based on exercises by Dennis Gärtner, Andreas Hefti and Nick Netzer. How to prove A B Direct proof

More information

EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018

EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 2018 EconS 501 Final Exam - December 10th, 018 Show all your work clearly and make sure you justify all your answers. NAME 1. Consider the market for smart pencil in which only one firm (Superapiz) enjoys a

More information

Tutorial 3: Optimisation

Tutorial 3: Optimisation Tutorial : Optimisation ECO411F 011 1. Find and classify the extrema of the cubic cost function C = C (Q) = Q 5Q +.. Find and classify the extreme values of the following functions (a) y = x 1 + x x 1x

More information

General Equilibrium. General Equilibrium, Berardino. Cesi, MSc Tor Vergata

General Equilibrium. General Equilibrium, Berardino. Cesi, MSc Tor Vergata General Equilibrium Equilibrium in Consumption GE begins (1/3) 2-Individual/ 2-good Exchange economy (No production, no transaction costs, full information..) Endowment (Nature): e Private property/ NO

More information

On the (Non-)Differentiability of the Optimal Value Function When the Optimal Solution Is Unique

On the (Non-)Differentiability of the Optimal Value Function When the Optimal Solution Is Unique On the (Non-)Differentiability of the Optimal Value Function When the Optimal Solution Is Unique Daisuke Oyama Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan oyama@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp

More information

Using Economic Contexts to Advance in Mathematics

Using Economic Contexts to Advance in Mathematics Using Economic Contexts to Advance in Mathematics Erik Balder University of Utrecht, Netherlands DEE 2013 presentation, Exeter Erik Balder (Mathematical Institute, University of Utrecht)using economic

More information