First-Order Low-Pass Filter
|
|
- Cornelius Fletcher
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Filters, Cost Functions, and Controller Structures Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 218! Dynamic systems as low-pass filters! Frequency response of dynamic systems! Shaping system response! LQ regulators with output vector cost functions! Implicit model-following! Cost functions with augmented state vector min Δu J = min Δu 1 2 Δx T (t)qδx(t) + Δu T (t)r dt subject to Δ!x(t) = FΔx(t) + G Copyright 218 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only First-Order Low-Pass Filter 2
2 Low-Pass Filter Low-pass filter passes low-frequency signals and attenuates high-frequency signals 1 st -order example Δ!x ( t) = aδx( t) + aδu( t) a =.1, 1, or 1 Laplace transform, with x() = Δx( s) = a ( s + a) Δu( s) Frequency response, s = jω Δx( jω ) = a Δu jω ( jω + a) 3 Response of 1 st -Order Low-Pass Filters to Step Input and Initial Condition Δ!x ( t) = aδx( t) + aδu( t) a =.1, 1, or 1 Smoothing effect on sharp changes 4
3 Frequency Response of Dynamic Systems 5 Response of 1 st -Order Low-Pass Filters to Sine-Wave Inputs Input Output Δu( t) = sin t sin 2t sin 4t x ( t) = 1x( t) + 1u( t)!x ( t) = x( t) + u( t) x ( t) =.1x( t) +.1u ( t) 6
4 Response of 1 st -Order Low- Pass Filters to White Noise Δ!x ( t) = aδx( t) + aδu( t) a =.1, 1, or 1 7 Relationship of Input Frequencies to Filter Bandwidth Δu( t) = sin ωt sin 2ωt sin 4ωt BANDWIDTH Input frequency at which output magnitude = 3dB How do we calculate frequency response? 8
5 Bode Plot Asymptotes, Departures, and Phase Angles for 1 st -Order Lags H red ( jω ) = 1 jω +1 General shape of amplitude ratio governed by asymptotes Slope of asymptotes changes by multiples of ±2 db/dec at poles or zeros of H(jω) Actual AR departs from asymptotes AR asymptotes of a real pole When ω =, slope = db/ dec When ω λ, slope = 2 db/ dec H blue ( jω ) = 1 jω +1 H green ( jω ) = 1 jω +1 Phase angle of a real, negative pole When ω =, ϕ = When ω = λ, ϕ = 45 When ω ->, ϕ -> nd -Order Low-Pass Filter Δ!!x ( t) = 2ζω n Δ!x ( t) ω 2 n Δx( t) + ω 2 n Δu( t) Laplace transform, with I.C. = Δx( s) = ω n 2 s 2 + 2ζω n s + ω n 2 Δu s Frequency response, s = jω Δx( jω ) = ω n 2 ( jω ) 2 + 2ζω n jω! H ( jω )Δu jω 2 + ω n Δu ( jω ) 1
6 2 nd -Order Step Response Increased damping decreases oscillatory over/undershoot Further increase eliminates oscillation 11 Amplitude Ratio Asymptotes and Departures of Second-Order Bode Plots (No Zeros) AR asymptotes of a pair of complex poles When ω =, slope = db/dec When ω ω n, slope = 4 db/ dec Height of resonant peak depends on damping ratio 12
7 Phase Angles of Second-Order Bode Plots (No Zeros) Phase angle of a pair of complex negative poles When ω =, ϕ = When ω = ω n, ϕ = 9 When ω ->, ϕ -> 18 Abruptness of phase shift depends on damping ratio 13 Transformation of the System Equations Time-Domain System Equations Δ!x(t) = F Δx(t) + G Δy(t) = H x Δx(t) + H u Laplace Transforms of System Equations sδx(s) Δx() = F Δx(s) + G Δu(s) [ ] Δx(s) = [ si F] 1 Δx() + GΔ u(s) Δy(s) = H x Δx(s) + H u Δu(s) 14
8 Transfer Function Matrix Laplace Transform of Output Vector Δy(s) = H x Δx(s) + H u Δu(s) = H x [ si F] 1 [ Δx() + G Δu(s) ]+ H u Δu(s) 1 G + H u = H x si F Δu(s) + H si F x = Control Effect + Initial Condition Effect Transfer Function Matrix relates control input to system output with H u = and neglecting initial condition H (s) = H x [ ] 1 Δx() [ si F] 1 G (r x m) 15 Scalar Frequency Response from Transfer Function Matrix Transfer function matrix with s = jω H (jω ) = H x Δy i ( s) Δu j s [ jωi F] 1 G (r x m) = H ij(jω ) = H xi [ jωi F] 1 G j (r x m) H xi = i th row of H x G j = j th column of G 16
9 Second-Order Transfer Function Second-order dynamic system Δ!x ( t) = Δ!x 1 ( t) Δ!x 2 ( t) = f 11 f 12 f 21 f 22 Δy( t) = Δy 1 ( t) Δy 2 ( t) = h 11 h 12 h 21 h 22 Δx 1 ( t) Δx 2 ( t) + g 11 g 12 g 21 f 22 Δx 1 ( t) Δx 2 ( t) Δu 1 ( t) Δu 2 ( t) Second-order transfer function matrix adj h H (s) = H x A( 11 h 12 s)g = h 21 h 22 det ( r n) ( n n) ( n m) (n = m = r = 2) = ( r m) = ( 2 2) ( s f 11 ) f 12 f 21 s f 22 ( s f 11 ) f 12 f 21 s f 22 g 11 g 12 g 21 f Scalar Transfer Function from Δu j to Δy i H ij (s) = k ijn ij (s) Δ(s) = k ij s q + b q 1 s q b 1 s + b s n + a n 1 s n a 1 s + a Just one element of the matrix, H(s) Denominator polynomial contains n roots Each numerator term is a polynomial with q zeros, where q varies from term to term and n 1 ij ( s z 2 ) ij... s z q ( s λ 2 )...( s λ n ) = k ij s z 1 s λ 1 ij # zeros = q # poles = n 18
10 Scalar Frequency Response Function for Single Input/Output Pair H ij (jω ) = k ij jω z 1 jω λ 1 Substitute: s = jω ij ij ( jω z 2 ) ij... jω z q ( jω λ 2 )...( jω λ n ) jφ (ω ) = a(ω)+ jb(ω) AR(ω) e Frequency response is a complex function of input frequency, ω Real and imaginary parts, or ** Amplitude ratio and phase angle ** 19 MATLAB Bode Plot with asymp.m nd -Order Pitch Rate Frequency Response, with zero bode.m asymp.m 2
11 Desirable Open-Loop Frequency Response Characteristics (Bode) High gain (amplitude) at low frequency Desired response is slowly varying Low gain at high frequency Random errors vary rapidly Crossover region is problem-specific 21 Examples of Proportional LQ Regulator Response 22
12 Example: Open-Loop Stable and Unstable 2 nd -Order LTI System Response to Initial Condition F S = F U = Stable Eigenvalues = i i Unstable Eigenvalues = i i 23 Example: Stabilizing Effect of Linear- Quadratic Regulators for Unstable 2 nd -Order System min Δu J = min Δu 1 2 ( Δx Δx rδu 2 )dt For the unstable system = c 1 c 2 r = 1 Control Gain (C) = Riccati Matrix (S) = Δx 1 (t) Δx 2 (t) = c Δx (t) c Δx (t) r = 1 Control Gain (C) = Riccati Matrix (S) = Closed-Loop Eigenvalues = Closed-Loop Eigenvalues = i i 24
13 Example: Stabilizing/Filtering Effect of LQ Regulators for the Unstable 2 nd - Order System r = 1 Control Gain (C) = Riccati Matrix (S) = Closed-Loop Eigenvalues = r = 1 Control Gain (C) = Riccati Matrix (S) = Closed-Loop Eigenvalues = i i 25 Example: Open-Loop Response of a Stable 2 nd -Order System to Random Disturbance Eigenvalues = ,
14 Example: Disturbance Response of Unstable System with Optimal Feedback 27 LQ Regulators with Output Vector Cost Functions 28
15 Quadratic Weighting of the Output Δy(t) = H x Δx(t) + H u J = 1 2 = 1 2 Δy T (t)q y Δy(t) dt {[ H x Δx(t) + H u ] T Q y [ H x Δx(t) + H u ]}dt Note: State, not output, is fed back 29 Quadratic Weighting of the Output min J = min 1 Δu Δu 2! min 1 Δu 2 Δx T (t) Δx T (t) Δu T (t) Δu T (t) H T x Q y H x H T x Q y H u H T u Q y H x H T u Q y H u + R o Q O M O M O T Δx(t) dt R O + R o Δx(t) dt = ( R O + R o ) 1 M T O + G T O P SS Δx( t) = CΔx( t) Output vector may not contain control (i.e., H u = ) Ad hoc R o added to assure invertability 3
16 min J = 1 Δy T (t)q y Δy(t) Δu 2 dt = 1 2 State Rate Can Be Expressed as an Output to be Minimized Δ!x(t) = FΔx(t) + G Δy(t) = H x Δx(t) + H u " FΔx(t) + G Δ!x T (t)q y Δ!x(t) dt min Δu J = min Δu! min Δu Δx T (t) 1 M SR T + G SR T P SS = R SR + R o Δx T (t) F T Q Δu T (t) y F G T Q y F Δu T (t) Q SR T M SR Special case of output weighting F T Q y G Δx(t) dt G T Q y G + R o M SR Δx(t) dt R SR + R o Δx( t) = CΔx( t) 31 Implicit Model-Following LQ Regulator Simulator aircraft dynamics Δ x(t) = FΔx(t) + G Ideal aircraft dynamics Δ x M (t) = F M Δx M (t) Feedback control law to provide dynamic similarity = C IMF Δx( t) Princeton Variable-Response Research Aircraft F-16 Another special case of output weighting 32
17 Implicit Model-Following LQ Regulator Assume state dimensions are the same Δ!x(t) = FΔx(t) + G Δ!x M (t) = F M Δx M (t) If simulation is successful, Δx M (t) Δx(t) and Δ!x M (t) F M Δx(t) 33 Implicit Model-Following LQ Regulator Cost function penalizes difference between actual and ideal model dynamics J = 1 2 {[ Δ x(t) Δ x M (t)] T Q M [ Δ x(t) Δ x M (t)]}dt min Δu J = min Δu! min Δu Δx(t) Δx(t) T ( F F M ) T Q M F F M G T Q M T Q IMF M IMF T M IMF R IMF + R o ( F F M ) T Q M G ( F F M ) G T Q M G + R o Δx(t) dt Therefore, ideal model is implicit in the optimizing feedback control law Δx(t) = ( R IMF + R o ) 1 M T IMF + G T IMF P SS Δx( t) = CΔx( t) dt 34
18 Cost Functions with Augmented State Vector 35 Integral Compensation Can Reduce Steady-State Errors! Sources of Steady-State Error! Constant disturbance! Errors in system dynamic model! Selector matrix, H I, can reduce or mix integrals in feedback Δ!x(t) = FΔx(t) + G Δ ξ! ( t) = H I Δx(t) Δ!x(t) Δ! ξ t = F G H I Δx(t) Δξ t + G 36
19 = C B Δx t! C B Δx t LQ Proportional- Integral (PI) Control t C I H I Δx τ C I Δξ( t) dτ where the integral state is Δξ t t! H I Δx τ dim H I dτ = m n define Δχ ( t)! Δx t Δξ t 37 Integral State is Added to the Cost Function and the Dynamic Model 1 min J = min Δu Δu 2 = min Δu 1 2 Δx T (t)q x Δx(t) + Δξ T ( t)q ξ Δξ t Δχ T (t) subject to = R 1 G T = C B Δx t + Δu T (t)r Q x Q ξ Δχ(t) + ΔuT (t)r dt Δ!χ(t) = F χ Δχ(t) + G χ C I Δξ( t) P SSΔχ(t) = C χ Δχ(t) dt 38
20 Integral State is Added to the Cost Function and the Dynamic Model = C χ Δχ(t) = C B Δx t Δu(s) = C χ Δχ(s) = C B Δx s = C B Δx s [ ] Δu(s) = C Bs + C I H x s C I Δξ( t) C I Δξ( s) H C x Δx( s) I Δx( s) s Bode Plot of Control Law: Integrator plus numerator matrix of zeros 39 Actuator Dynamics and Proportional-Filter LQ Regulators 4
21 Actuator Dynamics May Impact System Response Hydraulic Actuator Electric Motor Electro/ mechanical transduction via small piston Force multiplication by large piston 41 Actuator Dynamics May Affect System Response Δ!x(t) = FΔx(t) + G Augment state dynamics to include actuator dynamics Δ!u(t) = K + Δv(t) Δ!x(t) F G = Δ!u(t) K Δx(t) + Control variable is actuator forcing function I v Δv(t) 42
22 LQ Regulator with Actuator Dynamics 1 min J = min Δv Δv 2 = min Δv Re-define state and control vectors Δχ(t)! 1 2 F χ! Δx T (t)q x Δx(t) + Δu T (t)r u + Δv T (t)r v Δv(t) dt Δχ T (t) Δx(t) F G K Q x R u ; Δv( t) = Control ; G χ! I v Δχ(t) + ΔvT (t)r v Δv(t) dt subject to Δ!χ(t) = F χ Δχ(t) + G χ Δv(t) 43 LQ Regulator with Actuator Dynamics 1 Δv(t) = C χ Δχ(t) = R v = C B Δx( t) C A I v T PSS Δx( t) Control Velocity Δv(s) = C B Δx s C A Δu(s) 44
23 LQ Regulator with Actuator Dynamics Δ!u(t) = K C A C B Δx t sδu(s) = KΔu(s) C A Δu(s) C B Δx s si + K + C A Control Displacement Δu(s) = C B Δx( s) Δu(s) = si + K + C A 1 CB Δx( s) 45 LQ Regulator with Artificial Actuator Dynamics LQ control variable is derivative of actual system control Δ x(t) Δ u(t) = F G Δx(t) + I Δv(t) Δv(t) = Δ!u Int (t) = C B Δx( t) C A C A introduces artificial actuator dynamics, e.g., low-pass filter 46
24 Proportional-Filter (PF) LQ Regulator Δχ(t) = Δx(t) ; F = F G χ ; G χ = I Optimal LQ Regulator Δv(t) = Δ!u Integrator (t) = C χ Δχ(t) C A provides low-pass filtering effect on the control input Δu(s) = [ si + C A ] 1 C B Δx( s) 47 Proportional LQ Regulator: High- Frequency Control in Response to High-Frequency Disturbances 2nd-Order System Response with Perfect Actuator Good disturbance rejection, but high bandwidth may be unrealistic 48
25 Proportional-Filter LQ Regulator Reduces High-Frequency Control Signals 2nd-Order System Response... at the expense of decreased disturbance rejection 49 Next Time: Linear-Quadratic Control System Design 5
26 Supplemental Material 51 Princeton Variable-Response Research Aircraft (VRA) 52
27 Aircraft That Simulate Other Aircraft Closed-loop control Variable-stability research aircraft, e.g., TIFS, Learjet, NT-33A, and Princeton Variable-Response Research Aircraft (Navion) USAF/Calspan TIFS Princeton VRA USAF/Calspan NT-33A CalSpan Learjet 53
First-Order Low-Pass Filter!
Filters, Cost Functions, and Controller Structures! Robert Stengel! Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546! Princeton University, 217!! Dynamic systems as low-pass filters!! Frequency response of dynamic
More informationReturn Difference Function and Closed-Loop Roots Single-Input/Single-Output Control Systems
Spectral Properties of Linear- Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 2018! Stability margins of single-input/singleoutput (SISO) systems! Characterizations
More informationLinear-Quadratic Control System Design
Linear-Quadratic Control Sytem Deign Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Etimation MAE 546 Princeton Univerity, 218! Control ytem configuration! Proportional-integral! Proportional-integral-filtering! Model
More informationTime Response of Linear, Time-Invariant (LTI) Systems Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics MAE 331, 2018
Time Response of Linear, Time-Invariant LTI Systems Robert Stengel, Aircraft Flight Dynamics MAE 331, 2018 Learning Objectives Methods of time-domain analysis Continuous- and discrete-time models Transient
More informationTime-Invariant Linear Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 2015
Time-Invariant Linear Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 15 Asymptotic approach from time-varying to constant gains Elimination of cross weighting
More informationTime-Invariant Linear Quadratic Regulators!
Time-Invariant Linear Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 17 Asymptotic approach from time-varying to constant gains Elimination of cross weighting
More informationControl Systems! Copyright 2017 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only.
Control Systems Robert Stengel Robotics and Intelligent Systems MAE 345, Princeton University, 2017 Analog vs. digital systems Continuous- and Discretetime Dynamic Models Frequency Response Transfer Functions
More informationStochastic and Adaptive Optimal Control
Stochastic and Adaptive Optimal Control Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation, MAE 546 Princeton University, 2018! Nonlinear systems with random inputs and perfect measurements! Stochastic neighboring-optimal
More informationINTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL
ECE4540/5540: Digital Control Systems INTRODUCTION TO DIGITAL CONTROL.: Introduction In ECE450/ECE550 Feedback Control Systems, welearnedhow to make an analog controller D(s) to control a linear-time-invariant
More informationAutomatic Control 2. Loop shaping. Prof. Alberto Bemporad. University of Trento. Academic year
Automatic Control 2 Loop shaping Prof. Alberto Bemporad University of Trento Academic year 21-211 Prof. Alberto Bemporad (University of Trento) Automatic Control 2 Academic year 21-211 1 / 39 Feedback
More informationMAS107 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008
MAS07 CONTROL THEORY. HOVLAND: EXAM SOLUTION 2008 MAS07 Control Theory Exam Solutions 2008 Geir Hovland, Mechatronics Group, Grimstad, Norway June 30, 2008 C. Repeat question B, but plot the phase curve
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3.. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid -
More informationẋ n = f n (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (5) y 1 = g 1 (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (6) y p = g p (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (7)
EEE582 Topical Outline A.A. Rodriguez Fall 2007 GWC 352, 965-3712 The following represents a detailed topical outline of the course. It attempts to highlight most of the key concepts to be covered and
More informationThe loop shaping paradigm. Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2) Essential specifications (2)
Lecture 7. Loop analysis of feedback systems (2). Loop shaping 2. Performance limitations The loop shaping paradigm. Estimate performance and robustness of the feedback system from the loop transfer L(jω)
More informationSystems Analysis and Control
Systems Analysis and Control Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 21: Stability Margins and Closing the Loop Overview In this Lecture, you will learn: Closing the Loop Effect on Bode Plot Effect
More informationLaplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems
Laplace Transform Analysis of Signals and Systems Transfer Functions Transfer functions of CT systems can be found from analysis of Differential Equations Block Diagrams Circuit Diagrams 5/10/04 M. J.
More informationFrequency Response Analysis
Frequency Response Analysis Consider let the input be in the form Assume that the system is stable and the steady state response of the system to a sinusoidal inputdoes not depend on the initial conditions
More informationControl of Manufacturing Processes
Control of Manufacturing Processes Subject 2.830 Spring 2004 Lecture #19 Position Control and Root Locus Analysis" April 22, 2004 The Position Servo Problem, reference position NC Control Robots Injection
More informationTime Response Analysis (Part II)
Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuous-time, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary
More informationFeedback Control of Linear SISO systems. Process Dynamics and Control
Feedback Control of Linear SISO systems Process Dynamics and Control 1 Open-Loop Process The study of dynamics was limited to open-loop systems Observe process behavior as a result of specific input signals
More informationECE317 : Feedback and Control
ECE317 : Feedback and Control Lecture : Routh-Hurwitz stability criterion Examples Dr. Richard Tymerski Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Portland State University 1 Course roadmap Modeling
More informationRichiami di Controlli Automatici
Richiami di Controlli Automatici Gianmaria De Tommasi 1 1 Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II detommas@unina.it Ottobre 2012 Corsi AnsaldoBreda G. De Tommasi (UNINA) Richiami di Controlli Automatici
More informationSolutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises
Solutions to Skill-Assessment Exercises To Accompany Control Systems Engineering 4 th Edition By Norman S. Nise John Wiley & Sons Copyright 2004 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. No part
More informationHomework 7 - Solutions
Homework 7 - Solutions Note: This homework is worth a total of 48 points. 1. Compensators (9 points) For a unity feedback system given below, with G(s) = K s(s + 5)(s + 11) do the following: (c) Find the
More informationELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 2010/2011 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques
CAIRO UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ENGINEERING ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATIONS DEP. 3rd YEAR, 00/0 CONTROL ENGINEERING SHEET 5 Lead-Lag Compensation Techniques [] For the following system, Design a compensator such
More informationAnalysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain
Chapter 6 Analysis and Design of Control Systems in the Time Domain 6. Concepts of feedback control Given a system, we can classify it as an open loop or a closed loop depends on the usage of the feedback.
More informationActive Control? Contact : Website : Teaching
Active Control? Contact : bmokrani@ulb.ac.be Website : http://scmero.ulb.ac.be Teaching Active Control? Disturbances System Measurement Control Controler. Regulator.,,, Aims of an Active Control Disturbances
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017
More informationEE Control Systems LECTURE 9
Updated: Sunday, February, 999 EE - Control Systems LECTURE 9 Copyright FL Lewis 998 All rights reserved STABILITY OF LINEAR SYSTEMS We discuss the stability of input/output systems and of state-space
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
More informationCDS 101/110a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design
CDS 11/11a: Lecture 8-1 Frequency Domain Design Richard M. Murray 17 November 28 Goals: Describe canonical control design problem and standard performance measures Show how to use loop shaping to achieve
More informationControls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
More informationAMME3500: System Dynamics & Control
Stefan B. Williams May, 211 AMME35: System Dynamics & Control Assignment 4 Note: This assignment contributes 15% towards your final mark. This assignment is due at 4pm on Monday, May 3 th during Week 13
More informationCourse roadmap. Step response for 2nd-order system. Step response for 2nd-order system
ME45: Control Systems Lecture Time response of nd-order systems Prof. Clar Radcliffe and Prof. Jongeun Choi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University Modeling Laplace transform Transfer
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 9. 8. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid -
More informationDepartment of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics University of Minnesota Written Preliminary Examination: Control Systems Friday, April 9, 2010
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics University of Minnesota Written Preliminary Examination: Control Systems Friday, April 9, 2010 Problem 1: Control of Short Period Dynamics Consider the
More informationAPPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS
Version: 1 CONTROL APPLICATIONS FOR ROBOTICS TEX d: Feb. 17, 214 PREVIEW We show that the transfer function and conditions of stability for linear systems can be studied using Laplace transforms. Table
More informationMASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering Dynamics and Control II Fall 2007
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Mechanical Engineering.4 Dynamics and Control II Fall 7 Problem Set #9 Solution Posted: Sunday, Dec., 7. The.4 Tower system. The system parameters are
More informationExam. 135 minutes + 15 minutes reading time
Exam January 23, 27 Control Systems I (5-59-L) Prof. Emilio Frazzoli Exam Exam Duration: 35 minutes + 5 minutes reading time Number of Problems: 45 Number of Points: 53 Permitted aids: Important: 4 pages
More informationGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels)
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM DATE: 09-Dec-13 COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels) NAME: STUDENT #: LAST, FIRST Write your name on the front page
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 13, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)
More informationFATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
FATIMA MICHAEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY Senkottai Village, Madurai Sivagangai Main Road, Madurai - 625 020. An ISO 9001:2008 Certified Institution DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION
More informationTopic # Feedback Control
Topic #5 6.3 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Full-state Feedback Control How do we change the poles of the state-space system? Or,evenifwecanchangethepolelocations. Where do we put the poles? Linear
More informationRadar Dish. Armature controlled dc motor. Inside. θ r input. Outside. θ D output. θ m. Gearbox. Control Transmitter. Control. θ D.
Radar Dish ME 304 CONTROL SYSTEMS Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University Armature controlled dc motor Outside θ D output Inside θ r input r θ m Gearbox Control Transmitter
More informationPrüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 29. 8. 2 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationIntroduction to Feedback Control
Introduction to Feedback Control Control System Design Why Control? Open-Loop vs Closed-Loop (Feedback) Why Use Feedback Control? Closed-Loop Control System Structure Elements of a Feedback Control System
More informationLinear-Quadratic-Gaussian Controllers!
Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian Controllers! Robert Stengel! Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546! Princeton University, 2017!! LTI dynamic system!! Certainty Equivalence and the Separation Theorem!! Asymptotic
More informationWind Turbine Control
Wind Turbine Control W. E. Leithead University of Strathclyde, Glasgow Supergen Student Workshop 1 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Control Basics 3. General Control Objectives 4. Constant Speed Pitch Regulated
More informationStochastic Optimal Control!
Stochastic Control! Robert Stengel! Robotics and Intelligent Systems, MAE 345, Princeton University, 2015 Learning Objectives Overview of the Linear-Quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) Regulator Introduction to Stochastic
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8- am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total
More informationFrequency Response of Linear Time Invariant Systems
ME 328, Spring 203, Prof. Rajamani, University of Minnesota Frequency Response of Linear Time Invariant Systems Complex Numbers: Recall that every complex number has a magnitude and a phase. Example: z
More informationDynamic Response. Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu. Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology.
Dynamic Response Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Izmir Institute of Technology Chapter 3 Assoc. Prof. Enver Tatlicioglu (EEE@IYTE) EE362 Feedback Control
More informationProfessional Portfolio Selection Techniques: From Markowitz to Innovative Engineering
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sponsor: Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Cosponsor: Science Engineering and Business Club Professional Portfolio Selection Techniques: From Markowitz to
More information8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance
8.1.6 Quadratic pole response: resonance Example G(s)= v (s) v 1 (s) = 1 1+s L R + s LC L + Second-order denominator, of the form 1+a 1 s + a s v 1 (s) + C R Two-pole low-pass filter example v (s) with
More informationÜbersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam!
Prüfung Regelungstechnik I (Control Systems I) Prof. Dr. Lino Guzzella 3. 8. 24 Übersetzungshilfe / Translation aid (English) To be returned at the end of the exam! Do not mark up this translation aid
More informationControl Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
More informationOutline. Classical Control. Lecture 1
Outline Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Prerequisites Block diagram for system modeling Modeling Mechanical Electrical Outline Introduction Background Basic Systems Models/Transfers functions 1 Introduction
More informationROOT LOCUS. Consider the system. Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to. H(s) H ( s) = ( s)
C1 ROOT LOCUS Consider the system R(s) E(s) C(s) + K G(s) - H(s) C(s) R(s) = K G(s) 1 + K G(s) H(s) Root locus presents the poles of the closed-loop system when the gain K changes from 0 to 1+ K G ( s)
More informationControl Systems I. Lecture 2: Modeling. Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 2: Modeling Suggested Readings: Åström & Murray Ch. 2-3, Guzzella Ch. 2-3 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich September 29, 2017 E. Frazzoli
More informationFrequency methods for the analysis of feedback systems. Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems. Nyquist approach to study stability
Lecture 6. Loop analysis of feedback systems 1. Motivation 2. Graphical representation of frequency response: Bode and Nyquist curves 3. Nyquist stability theorem 4. Stability margins Frequency methods
More information100 (s + 10) (s + 100) e 0.5s. s 100 (s + 10) (s + 100). G(s) =
1 AME 3315; Spring 215; Midterm 2 Review (not graded) Problems: 9.3 9.8 9.9 9.12 except parts 5 and 6. 9.13 except parts 4 and 5 9.28 9.34 You are given the transfer function: G(s) = 1) Plot the bode plot
More information1 Mathematics. 1.1 Determine the one-sided Laplace transform of the following signals. + 2y = σ(t) dt 2 + 3dy dt. , where A is a constant.
Mathematics. Determine the one-sided Laplace transform of the following signals. {, t < a) u(t) =, where A is a constant. A, t {, t < b) u(t) =, where A is a constant. At, t c) u(t) = e 2t for t. d) u(t)
More informationEECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 14, am. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 14, 211 81-11 am Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth 1 points total. Problem Points Score 1 16 2 12
More informationReglerteknik: Exercises
Reglerteknik: Exercises Exercises, Hints, Answers Liten reglerteknisk ordlista Introduktion till Control System Toolbox ver. 5 This version: January 3, 25 AUTOMATIC CONTROL REGLERTEKNIK LINKÖPINGS UNIVERSITET
More informationTable of Laplacetransform
Appendix Table of Laplacetransform pairs 1(t) f(s) oct), unit impulse at t = 0 a, a constant or step of magnitude a at t = 0 a s t, a ramp function e- at, an exponential function s + a sin wt, a sine fun
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 12: I/O Stability Readings: DDV, Chapters 15, 16 Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology March 14, 2011 E. Frazzoli
More informationAN INTRODUCTION TO THE CONTROL THEORY
Open-Loop controller An Open-Loop (OL) controller is characterized by no direct connection between the output of the system and its input; therefore external disturbance, non-linear dynamics and parameter
More informationagree w/input bond => + sign disagree w/input bond => - sign
1 ME 344 REVIEW FOR FINAL EXAM LOCATION: CPE 2.204 M. D. BRYANT DATE: Wednesday, May 7, 2008 9-noon Finals week office hours: May 6, 4-7 pm Permitted at final exam: 1 sheet of formulas & calculator I.
More informationDynamic circuits: Frequency domain analysis
Electronic Circuits 1 Dynamic circuits: Contents Free oscillation and natural frequency Transfer functions Frequency response Bode plots 1 System behaviour: overview 2 System behaviour : review solution
More information7.2 Controller tuning from specified characteristic polynomial
192 Finn Haugen: PID Control 7.2 Controller tuning from specified characteristic polynomial 7.2.1 Introduction The subsequent sections explain controller tuning based on specifications of the characteristic
More informationContents. PART I METHODS AND CONCEPTS 2. Transfer Function Approach Frequency Domain Representations... 42
Contents Preface.............................................. xiii 1. Introduction......................................... 1 1.1 Continuous and Discrete Control Systems................. 4 1.2 Open-Loop
More informationState Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 6.2 Solutions. HW 6.2 Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 6.2 Solutions. PI Controller For the system G = K (s+)(s+3)(s+8) HW 6.2 Solutions in negative feedback operating at a damping ratio of., we are going to design a PI controller
More informationEE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems
1 / 17 EE3CL4: Introduction to Linear Control Systems Section 7: McMaster University Winter 2018 2 / 17 Outline 1 4 / 17 Cascade compensation Throughout this lecture we consider the case of H(s) = 1. We
More informationFrequency Dependent Aspects of Op-amps
Frequency Dependent Aspects of Op-amps Frequency dependent feedback circuits The arguments that lead to expressions describing the circuit gain of inverting and non-inverting amplifier circuits with resistive
More informationAutomatic Control (TSRT15): Lecture 7
Automatic Control (TSRT15): Lecture 7 Tianshi Chen Division of Automatic Control Dept. of Electrical Engineering Email: tschen@isy.liu.se Phone: 13-282226 Office: B-house extrance 25-27 Outline 2 Feedforward
More informationControl of Manufacturing Processes
Control of Manufacturing Processes Subject 2.830 Spring 2004 Lecture #18 Basic Control Loop Analysis" April 15, 2004 Revisit Temperature Control Problem τ dy dt + y = u τ = time constant = gain y ss =
More informationControl Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications
Control Systems I Lecture 10: System Specifications Readings: Guzzella, Chapter 10 Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich November 24, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture
More informationLinear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101 - Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
More informationIntroduction to Optimization!
Introduction to Optimization! Robert Stengel! Robotics and Intelligent Systems, MAE 345, Princeton University, 2017 Optimization problems and criteria Cost functions Static optimality conditions Examples
More informationProcess Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040)
First-order systems Process Control & Instrumentation (CH 3040) Arun K. Tangirala Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Madras January - April 010 Lectures: Mon, Tue, Wed, Fri Extra class: Thu A first-order
More informationLearn2Control Laboratory
Learn2Control Laboratory Version 3.2 Summer Term 2014 1 This Script is for use in the scope of the Process Control lab. It is in no way claimed to be in any scientific way complete or unique. Errors should
More informationTopic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
More informationDr Ian R. Manchester
Week Content Notes 1 Introduction 2 Frequency Domain Modelling 3 Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 Block Diagrams 5 Feedback System Characteristics Assign 1 Due 6 Root Locus 7 Root Locus 2 Assign
More informationEE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 8 - Solutions. HW 8 - Solutions
EE C28 / ME C34 Fall 24 HW 8 - Solutions HW 8 - Solutions. Transient Response Design via Gain Adjustment For a transfer function G(s) = in negative feedback, find the gain to yield a 5% s(s+2)(s+85) overshoot
More informationDesign Methods for Control Systems
Design Methods for Control Systems Maarten Steinbuch TU/e Gjerrit Meinsma UT Dutch Institute of Systems and Control Winter term 2002-2003 Schedule November 25 MSt December 2 MSt Homework # 1 December 9
More informationChapter 8: Frequency Domain Analysis
Chapter 8: Frequency Domain Analysis Samantha Ramirez Preview Questions 1. What is the steady-state response of a linear system excited by a cyclic or oscillatory input? 2. How does one characterize the
More informationChapter 9: Controller design
Chapter 9. Controller Design 9.1. Introduction 9.2. Effect of negative feedback on the network transfer functions 9.2.1. Feedback reduces the transfer function from disturbances to the output 9.2.2. Feedback
More information(b) A unity feedback system is characterized by the transfer function. Design a suitable compensator to meet the following specifications:
1. (a) The open loop transfer function of a unity feedback control system is given by G(S) = K/S(1+0.1S)(1+S) (i) Determine the value of K so that the resonance peak M r of the system is equal to 1.4.
More informationFREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN
ECE45/55: Feedback Control Systems. 9 FREQUENCY-RESPONSE DESIGN 9.: PD and lead compensation networks The frequency-response methods we have seen so far largely tell us about stability and stability margins
More informationLecture 5 Classical Control Overview III. Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore
Lecture 5 Classical Control Overview III Dr. Radhakant Padhi Asst. Professor Dept. of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Science - Bangalore A Fundamental Problem in Control Systems Poles of open
More informationGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM. COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels)
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL of ELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING FINAL EXAM DATE: 30-Apr-14 COURSE: ECE 3084A (Prof. Michaels) NAME: STUDENT #: LAST, FIRST Write your name on the front page
More informationThe Laplace Transform
The Laplace Transform Generalizing the Fourier Transform The CTFT expresses a time-domain signal as a linear combination of complex sinusoids of the form e jωt. In the generalization of the CTFT to the
More informationRaktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles. Frequency Response-Design Method
.. AERO 422: Active Controls for Aerospace Vehicles Frequency Response- Method Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. ... Response to
More informationSoftware Engineering 3DX3. Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques
Software Engineering 3DX3 Slides 8: Root Locus Techniques Dr. Ryan Leduc Department of Computing and Software McMaster University Material based on Control Systems Engineering by N. Nise. c 2006, 2007
More information(a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: G(s) =
126 INTRDUCTIN T CNTR ENGINEERING 10( s 1) (a) Find the transfer function of the amplifier. Ans.: (. 02s 1)(. 001s 1) (b) Find the expected percent overshoot for a step input for the closed-loop system
More informationOverview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros)
Overview of Bode Plots Transfer function review Piece-wise linear approximations First-order terms Second-order terms (complex poles & zeros) J. McNames Portland State University ECE 222 Bode Plots Ver.
More informationECE 486 Control Systems
ECE 486 Control Systems Spring 208 Midterm #2 Information Issued: April 5, 208 Updated: April 8, 208 ˆ This document is an info sheet about the second exam of ECE 486, Spring 208. ˆ Please read the following
More informationOften, in this class, we will analyze a closed-loop feedback control system, and end up with an equation of the form
ME 32, Spring 25, UC Berkeley, A. Packard 55 7 Review of SLODEs Throughout this section, if y denotes a function (of time, say), then y [k or y (k) denotes the k th derivative of the function y, y [k =
More informationThe Laplace Transform
The Laplace Transform Syllabus ECE 316, Spring 2015 Final Grades Homework (6 problems per week): 25% Exams (midterm and final): 50% (25:25) Random Quiz: 25% Textbook M. Roberts, Signals and Systems, 2nd
More information