Intro. Computer Control Systems: F9
|
|
|
- Berniece Barton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Intro. Computer Control Systems: F9 State-feedback control and observers Dave Zachariah Dept. Information Technology, Div. Systems and Control 1 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
2 F8: Quiz! 2 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
3 F8: Quiz! 1) For an observable system a the effect of all x(t) can be observed in y(t) b we have det O = 0 c we have stability 2 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
4 F8: Quiz! 1) For an observable system a the effect of all x(t) can be observed in y(t) b we have det O = 0 c we have stability 2) If a state-space form of G(s) is a minimal realization, a A:s eigenvalues < G(s):s poles b A:s eigenvalues = G(s):s poles c there exist more compact state-space forms 2 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
5 F8: Quiz! 1) For an observable system a the effect of all x(t) can be observed in y(t) b we have det O = 0 c we have stability 2) If a state-space form of G(s) is a minimal realization, a A:s eigenvalues < G(s):s poles b A:s eigenvalues = G(s):s poles c there exist more compact state-space forms 3) For a controllable system with state-feedback control a the closed-loop system is stable b the poles of the closed-loop system can be designed arbitrarily c no information about the system is required 2 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
6 State-feedback control 3 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
7 State-feedback control State-space form of linear time-invariant system ẋ = Ax + Bu y = Cx G(s) = C(sI A) 1 B u x y (si A) 1 B C 4 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
8 State-feedback control Controller using state feedback u = Lx + l 0 r gives closed-loop system ẋ = (A BL)x + Bl 0 r y = Cx where r is the reference signal. 4 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
9 State-feedback control Controler using state feedback gives closed-loop system u = Lx + l 0 r ẋ = (A BL)x + Bl 0 r y = Cx where r is the reference signal. rl 0 u x y (si A) 1 B C + L G c (s) = C(sI A + BL) 1 Bl 0 4 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
10 Pole placement Rules of thumb for designing L Eigenvalues/poles given by det(si A + BL) = 0, which we can design Im{s} Re{s} 5 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
11 Pole placement Rules of thumb for designing L Eigenvalues/poles given by det(si A + BL) = 0, which we can design Im{s} Re{s} Distance to the origin: Quick system but also sensitive to disturbances 5 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
12 Estimating the states via simulation 6 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
13 Estimating the states Via simulation Controller u = Lx + l 0 r requires states x which are often unknown. 7 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
14 Estimating the states Via simulation Controller u = Lx + l 0 r requires states x which are often unknown. In practice, feedback using u = Lˆx + l 0 r where ˆx is an estimate of x. 7 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
15 Estimating the states Via simulation Controller u = Lx + l 0 r requires states x which are often unknown. In practice, feedback using u = Lˆx + l 0 r where ˆx is an estimate of x. Naive idea: Estimate x by simulating the states where ˆx 0 is an initial guess. ˆx = Aˆx + Bu, ˆx(0) = ˆx 0 7 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
16 Build intuition from simple systems State estimation via simulation Ex.: Damper y State-space form: [ ] [ ] ẋ(t) = x(t) + u(t), x(0) = x k/m 0 1/m 0 y(t) = [ 1 0 ] x(t) u 8 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
17 Build intuition from simple systems State estimation via simulation Example using impulse u input u(t), output y(t) u(t) y(t) t [s] System with unknown initial state x 0 8 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
18 Build intuition from simple systems State estimation via simulation Naive estimate using perfect initial guess: ˆx = Aˆx + Bu, ˆx 0 = x x 2 (velocity) [m/s] x 1 (position) [m] x versus ˆx at t = / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
19 Build intuition from simple systems State estimation via simulation Naive estimate using perfect initial guess: ˆx = Aˆx + Bu, ˆx 0 = x x 2 (velocity) [m/s] x 1 (position) [m] x versus ˆx at t = 20 8 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
20 Build intuition from simple systems State estimation via simulation Naive estimate using perfect initial guess: ˆx = Aˆx + Bu, ˆx 0 = x x 2 (velocity) [m/s] x 1 (position) [m] x versus ˆx at t = / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
21 Build intuition from simple systems State estimation via simulation Naive estimate using wrong initial guess: ˆx = Aˆx + Bu, ˆx 0 x x 2 (velocity) [m/s] x 1 (position) [m] x versus ˆx at t = / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
22 Build intuition from simple systems State estimation via simulation Naive estimate using wrong initial guess: ˆx = Aˆx + Bu, ˆx 0 x x 2 (velocity) [m/s] x 1 (position) [m] x versus ˆx at t = 20 9 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
23 Build intuition from simple systems State estimation via simulation Naive estimate using wrong initial guess: ˆx = Aˆx + Bu, ˆx 0 x x 2 (velocity) [m/s] x 1 (position) [m] x versus ˆx at t = / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
24 Build intuition from simple systems State estimation via simulation x och ˆx correspond to different outputs: y = Cx versus ŷ = C ˆx output y(t) y(t) C ˆx(t) t [s] 9 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
25 Estimating the states via observer 10 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
26 Estimating the states Correcting the state estimates Idea: Feedback the prediction error y C ˆx to correct ˆx Observer: an estimator with a correction term ˆx = Aˆx + Bu + K ( y C ˆx ), ˆx(0) = ˆx 0 }{{} correction 11 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
27 Estimating the states Correcting the state estimates Idea: Feedback the prediction error y C ˆx to correct ˆx Observer: an estimator with a correction term Using matrix ˆx = Aˆx + Bu + K ( y C ˆx ), ˆx(0) = ˆx 0 }{{} correction we can design the estimator. k 1 k 2 K =. k n 11 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
28 Estimating the states Correcting the state estimates Idea: Feedback the prediction error y C ˆx to correct ˆx Observer: an estimator with a correction term ˆx = Aˆx + Bu + K ( y C ˆx ), ˆx(0) = ˆx 0 }{{} correction u x y (si A) 1 B C ˆx Obs. 11 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
29 Build intuition using simple systems State estimation using observer Estimation using observer: ˆx = Aˆx + Bu + K ( y C ˆx ), ˆx 0 x x 2 (velocity) [m/s] x 1 (position) [m] x versus ˆx at t = / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
30 Build intuition using simple systems State estimation using observer Estimation using observer: ˆx = Aˆx + Bu + K ( y C ˆx ), ˆx 0 x x 2 (velocity) [m/s] x 1 (position) [m] x versus ˆx at t = / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
31 Build intuition using simple systems State estimation using observer Estimation using observer: ˆx = Aˆx + Bu + K ( y C ˆx ), ˆx 0 x x 2 (velocity) [m/s] x 1 (position) [m] x versus ˆx at t = / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
32 State estimation Estimation error and observability Estimation error: x x ˆx [Board: derive evolution of estimation errors] 13 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
33 State estimation Estimation error and observability Estimation error: x x ˆx [Board: derive evolution of estimation errors] Result Errors of observer described as system x(t) = e (A KC)t x(0) and therefore x(t) decays at a rate given by maximum Re{ s i } where s i are observer poles/eigenvalues of (A KC). 13 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
34 State estimation Estimation error and observability Estimation error: x x ˆx Result 9.2 State-space form is observable (cf. det O 0) matrix K can be chosen such that x vanish arbitrarily quick 14 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
35 State estimation Estimation error and observability Estimation error: x x ˆx Result 9.2 State-space form is observable (cf. det O 0) matrix K can be chosen such that x vanish arbitrarily quick K is solved by polynomial det(si A + KC) = 0 with desired roots in left halfplane 14 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
36 State estimation Estimation error and observability Estimation error: x x ˆx Result 9.2 State-space form is observable (cf. det O 0) matrix K can be chosen such that x vanish arbitrarily quick K is solved by polynomial det(si A + KC) = 0 with desired roots in left halfplane Quick observer ˆx is however sensitive to measurement noise! 14 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
37 Combining feedback with estimated states 15 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
38 Feedback using estimated states Controller the Laplace domain rl 0 + u x y (si A) 1 B C L ˆx Obs. 16 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
39 Feedback using estimated states Controller the Laplace domain rl 0 + u x y (si A) 1 B C L ˆx Obs. System and controller with observer: { { ẋ = Ax + Bu u and y = Cx ˆx = Lˆx + l 0 r = Aˆx + Bu + K(y C ˆx) 16 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
40 Feedback using estimated states Controller the Laplace domain rl 0 + u x y (si A) 1 B C L ˆx Obs. Controller with observer: { U(s) = L L : X(s) + l 0 R(s) s X(s) = A X(s) + BU(s) + K ( Y (s) C X(s) ) [Board: solve for controller] 16 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
41 Feedback using estimated states General linear feedback control General linear feedback form, ch.9.5 G&L Controller with observer can be written as where U(s) = F r (s)r(s) F y (s)y (s), F r (s) = (1 L(sI A + KC + BL) 1 B)l 0 F y (s) = L(sI A + KC + BL) 1 K r F r + u G y F y 17 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
42 Resulting closed-loop system 18 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
43 Feedback using estimated states Effect of estimation error rl 0 + u x y (si A) 1 B C L ˆx Obs. Study system and controller with observer: { ẋ = Ax + Bu and u = Lˆx + l 0 r y = Cx by substituting ˆx = x x [Board: derive the closed-loop system with estimation error x] 19 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
44 Feedback using estimated states Effect of estimation error rl 0 + u x y (si A) 1 B C L ˆx Obs. Yields closed-loop system: ẋ = (A BL)x + y = Cx with additional error states effect of estimation error {}}{ BL x +Bl 0 r x = (A KC) x 0 [Board: write the closed-loop system in state-space form] 19 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
45 Feedback using estimated states The closed-loop system with observer The closed-loop system with estimation error can be written as [ẋ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] A BL BL x B = + l x 0 A KC x 0 0 r }{{}}{{} Ã B y = [ C 0 ] }{{} C with extended state vector. [ x x This yields transfer function from r to y: ] G c (s) = C(sI Ã) 1 B 20 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
46 Feedback using estimated states The closed-loop system with observer Closed-loop system transfer function, ch.9.5 G&L Insert matrices Ã, B and C yields G c (s) = C(sI Ã) 1 B = C(sI A + BL) 1 Bl 0 with same poles as if states were known and K is gone! r F r + u G y F y 20 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
47 Summary and recap Rules of thumb for pole placement Estimation using observer Feedback using estimated states Closed-loop system with observer 21 / 21 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se
Intro. Computer Control Systems: F8
Intro. Computer Control Systems: F8 Properties of state-space descriptions and feedback Dave Zachariah Dept. Information Technology, Div. Systems and Control 1 / 22 dave.zachariah@it.uu.se F7: Quiz! 2
POLE PLACEMENT. Sadegh Bolouki. Lecture slides for ECE 515. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Fall S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19
POLE PLACEMENT Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 19 Outline 1 State Feedback 2 Observer 3 Observer Feedback 4 Reduced Order
CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
5. Observer-based Controller Design
EE635 - Control System Theory 5. Observer-based Controller Design Jitkomut Songsiri state feedback pole-placement design regulation and tracking state observer feedback observer design LQR and LQG 5-1
Lec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action
Lec 6: State Feedback, Controllability, Integral Action November 22, 2017 Lund University, Department of Automatic Control Controllability and Observability Example of Kalman decomposition 1 s 1 x 10 x
Topic # Feedback Control. State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback
Topic #17 16.31 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Closed-loop control using estimators and regulators. Dynamics output feedback Back to reality Copyright 21 by Jonathan How. All Rights reserved 1 Fall
Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft
Control Systems Design, SC426 SC426 Fall 2, dr A Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 5 Controllable Canonical and Observable Canonical Forms Stabilization by State Feedback State Estimation, Observer Design
6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN
6 OUTPUT FEEDBACK DESIGN When the whole sate vector is not available for feedback, i.e, we can measure only y = Cx. 6.1 Review of observer design Recall from the first class in linear systems that a simple
ECE 388 Automatic Control
Controllability and State Feedback Control Associate Prof. Dr. of Mechatronics Engineeering Çankaya University Compulsory Course in Electronic and Communication Engineering Credits (2/2/3) Course Webpage:
EL 625 Lecture 10. Pole Placement and Observer Design. ẋ = Ax (1)
EL 625 Lecture 0 EL 625 Lecture 0 Pole Placement and Observer Design Pole Placement Consider the system ẋ Ax () The solution to this system is x(t) e At x(0) (2) If the eigenvalues of A all lie in the
EEE582 Homework Problems
EEE582 Homework Problems HW. Write a state-space realization of the linearized model for the cruise control system around speeds v = 4 (Section.3, http://tsakalis.faculty.asu.edu/notes/models.pdf). Use
Linear State Feedback Controller Design
Assignment For EE5101 - Linear Systems Sem I AY2010/2011 Linear State Feedback Controller Design Phang Swee King A0033585A Email: king@nus.edu.sg NGS/ECE Dept. Faculty of Engineering National University
Control Systems Design
ELEC4410 Control Systems Design Lecture 18: State Feedback Tracking and State Estimation Julio H. Braslavsky julio@ee.newcastle.edu.au School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Lecture 18:
ECEEN 5448 Fall 2011 Homework #4 Solutions
ECEEN 5448 Fall 2 Homework #4 Solutions Professor David G. Meyer Novemeber 29, 2. The state-space realization is A = [ [ ; b = ; c = [ which describes, of course, a free mass (in normalized units) with
EL2520 Control Theory and Practice
So far EL2520 Control Theory and Practice r Fr wu u G w z n Lecture 5: Multivariable systems -Fy Mikael Johansson School of Electrical Engineering KTH, Stockholm, Sweden SISO control revisited: Signal
State Regulator. Advanced Control. design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules
Advanced Control State Regulator Scope design of controllers using pole placement and LQ design rules Keywords pole placement, optimal control, LQ regulator, weighting matrixes Prerequisites Contact state
State Feedback and State Estimators Linear System Theory and Design, Chapter 8.
1 Linear System Theory and Design, http://zitompul.wordpress.com 2 0 1 4 2 Homework 7: State Estimators (a) For the same system as discussed in previous slides, design another closed-loop state estimator,
ẋ n = f n (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (5) y 1 = g 1 (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (6) y p = g p (x 1,...,x n,u 1,...,u m ) (7)
EEE582 Topical Outline A.A. Rodriguez Fall 2007 GWC 352, 965-3712 The following represents a detailed topical outline of the course. It attempts to highlight most of the key concepts to be covered and
One-Sided Laplace Transform and Differential Equations
One-Sided Laplace Transform and Differential Equations As in the dcrete-time case, the one-sided transform allows us to take initial conditions into account. Preliminaries The one-sided Laplace transform
Pole placement control: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2
: state space and polynomial approaches Lecture 2 : a state O. Sename 1 1 Gipsa-lab, CNRS-INPG, FRANCE Olivier.Sename@gipsa-lab.fr www.gipsa-lab.fr/ o.sename -based November 21, 2017 Outline : a state
Identification Methods for Structural Systems
Prof. Dr. Eleni Chatzi System Stability Fundamentals Overview System Stability Assume given a dynamic system with input u(t) and output x(t). The stability property of a dynamic system can be defined from
EE C128 / ME C134 Fall 2014 HW 9 Solutions. HW 9 Solutions. 10(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) G(s) =
1. Pole Placement Given the following open-loop plant, HW 9 Solutions G(s) = 1(s + 3) s(s + 2)(s + 5) design the state-variable feedback controller u = Kx + r, where K = [k 1 k 2 k 3 ] is the feedback
TRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION
TRACKING AND DISTURBANCE REJECTION Sadegh Bolouki Lecture slides for ECE 515 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Fall 2016 S. Bolouki (UIUC) 1 / 13 General objective: The output to track a reference
Observability and state estimation
EE263 Autumn 2015 S Boyd and S Lall Observability and state estimation state estimation discrete-time observability observability controllability duality observers for noiseless case continuous-time observability
Control Systems I. Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli
Control Systems I Lecture 4: Diagonalization, Modal Analysis, Intro to Feedback Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 13, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH)
Introduction to Computer Control Systems
Introduction to Computer Control Systems Lecture 1: Introduction Dave Zachariah Div. Systems and Control, Dept. Information Technology, Uppsala University October 28, 2014 (UU/Info Technology/SysCon) Intro.
Lecture 19 Observability and state estimation
EE263 Autumn 2007-08 Stephen Boyd Lecture 19 Observability and state estimation state estimation discrete-time observability observability controllability duality observers for noiseless case continuous-time
Control Systems. Frequency domain analysis. L. Lanari
Control Systems m i l e r p r a in r e v y n is o Frequency domain analysis L. Lanari outline introduce the Laplace unilateral transform define its properties show its advantages in turning ODEs to algebraic
Solution via Laplace transform and matrix exponential
EE263 Autumn 2015 S. Boyd and S. Lall Solution via Laplace transform and matrix exponential Laplace transform solving ẋ = Ax via Laplace transform state transition matrix matrix exponential qualitative
Final: Signal, Systems and Control (BME )
Final: Signal, Systems and Control (BME 580.) Instructor: René Vidal May 0th 007 HONOR SYSTEM: This examination is strictly individual. You are not allowed to talk, discuss, exchange solutions, etc., with
State Feedback and State Estimators Linear System Theory and Design, Chapter 8.
1 Linear System Theory and Design, http://zitompul.wordpress.com 2 0 1 4 State Estimator In previous section, we have discussed the state feedback, based on the assumption that all state variables are
Time Response of Systems
Chapter 0 Time Response of Systems 0. Some Standard Time Responses Let us try to get some impulse time responses just by inspection: Poles F (s) f(t) s-plane Time response p =0 s p =0,p 2 =0 s 2 t p =
Chapter 3. State Feedback - Pole Placement. Motivation
Chapter 3 State Feedback - Pole Placement Motivation Whereas classical control theory is based on output feedback, this course mainly deals with control system design by state feedback. This model-based
SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER
SYSTEMTEORI - ÖVNING 5: FEEDBACK, POLE ASSIGNMENT AND OBSERVER Exercise 54 Consider the system: ẍ aẋ bx u where u is the input and x the output signal (a): Determine a state space realization (b): Is the
Control Systems. Laplace domain analysis
Control Systems Laplace domain analysis L. Lanari outline introduce the Laplace unilateral transform define its properties show its advantages in turning ODEs to algebraic equations define an Input/Output
CDS Solutions to the Midterm Exam
CDS 22 - Solutions to the Midterm Exam Instructor: Danielle C. Tarraf November 6, 27 Problem (a) Recall that the H norm of a transfer function is time-delay invariant. Hence: ( ) Ĝ(s) = s + a = sup /2
Zeros and zero dynamics
CHAPTER 4 Zeros and zero dynamics 41 Zero dynamics for SISO systems Consider a linear system defined by a strictly proper scalar transfer function that does not have any common zero and pole: g(s) =α p(s)
Synthesis via State Space Methods
Chapter 18 Synthesis via State Space Methods Here, we will give a state space interpretation to many of the results described earlier. In a sense, this will duplicate the earlier work. Our reason for doing
ME 132, Fall 2015, Quiz # 2
ME 132, Fall 2015, Quiz # 2 # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 Total NAME 14 10 8 6 14 8 60 Rules: 1. 2 sheets of notes allowed, 8.5 11 inches. Both sides can be used. 2. Calculator is allowed. Keep it in plain view
1 (30 pts) Dominant Pole
EECS C8/ME C34 Fall Problem Set 9 Solutions (3 pts) Dominant Pole For the following transfer function: Y (s) U(s) = (s + )(s + ) a) Give state space description of the system in parallel form (ẋ = Ax +
Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft
Control Systems Design, SC4026 SC4026 Fall 2010, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 4 Controllability (a.k.a. Reachability) and Observability Algebraic Tests (Kalman rank condition & Hautus test) A few
ECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS. Lecture 6 Mathematical Representation of Physical Systems II 1/67
1/67 ECEN 420 LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS Lecture 6 Mathematical Representation of Physical Systems II State Variable Models for Dynamic Systems u 1 u 2 u ṙ. Internal Variables x 1, x 2 x n y 1 y 2. y m Figure
SYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL
SYSTEMTEORI - KALMAN FILTER VS LQ CONTROL 1. Optimal regulator with noisy measurement Consider the following system: ẋ = Ax + Bu + w, x(0) = x 0 where w(t) is white noise with Ew(t) = 0, and x 0 is a stochastic
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014
Controls Problems for Qualifying Exam - Spring 2014 Problem 1 Consider the system block diagram given in Figure 1. Find the overall transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s). Note that this transfer function
There are none. Abstract for Gauranteed Margins for LQG Regulators, John Doyle, 1978 [Doy78].
![There are none. Abstract for Gauranteed Margins for LQG Regulators, John Doyle, 1978 [Doy78].](/thumbs/75/71676858.jpg "There are none. Abstract for Gauranteed Margins for LQG Regulators, John Doyle, 1978 [Doy78].")
Chapter 7 Output Feedback There are none. Abstract for Gauranteed Margins for LQG Regulators, John Doyle, 1978 [Doy78]. In the last chapter we considered the use of state feedback to modify the dynamics
EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014
EE C128 / ME C134 Final Exam Fall 2014 December 19, 2014 Your PRINTED FULL NAME Your STUDENT ID NUMBER Number of additional sheets 1. No computers, no tablets, no connected device (phone etc.) 2. Pocket
University of Toronto Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE410F Control Systems Problem Set #3 Solutions = Q o = CA.
University of Toronto Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE41F Control Systems Problem Set #3 Solutions 1. The observability matrix is Q o C CA 5 6 3 34. Since det(q o ), the matrix is
Chapter 3. LQ, LQG and Control System Design. Dutch Institute of Systems and Control
Chapter 3 LQ, LQG and Control System H 2 Design Overview LQ optimization state feedback LQG optimization output feedback H 2 optimization non-stochastic version of LQG Application to feedback system design
Control Systems I. Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros. Readings: Emilio Frazzoli. Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich
Control Systems I Lecture 6: Poles and Zeros Readings: Emilio Frazzoli Institute for Dynamic Systems and Control D-MAVT ETH Zürich October 27, 2017 E. Frazzoli (ETH) Lecture 6: Control Systems I 27/10/2017
ECE504: Lecture 9. D. Richard Brown III. Worcester Polytechnic Institute. 04-Nov-2008
ECE504: Lecture 9 D. Richard Brown III Worcester Polytechnic Institute 04-Nov-2008 Worcester Polytechnic Institute D. Richard Brown III 04-Nov-2008 1 / 38 Lecture 9 Major Topics ECE504: Lecture 9 We are
1 Continuous-time Systems
Observability Completely controllable systems can be restructured by means of state feedback to have many desirable properties. But what if the state is not available for feedback? What if only the output
State will have dimension 5. One possible choice is given by y and its derivatives up to y (4)
A Exercise State will have dimension 5. One possible choice is given by y and its derivatives up to y (4 x T (t [ y(t y ( (t y (2 (t y (3 (t y (4 (t ] T With this choice we obtain A B C [ ] D 2 3 4 To
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science : MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science 6.245: MULTIVARIABLE CONTROL SYSTEMS by A. Megretski Q-Parameterization 1 This lecture introduces the so-called
DESIGN OF OBSERVERS FOR SYSTEMS WITH SLOW AND FAST MODES
DESIGN OF OBSERVERS FOR SYSTEMS WITH SLOW AND FAST MODES by HEONJONG YOO A thesis submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the
Control Systems Design, SC4026. SC4026 Fall 2009, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft
Control Systems Design, SC4026 SC4026 Fall 2009, dr. A. Abate, DCSC, TU Delft Lecture 4 Controllability (a.k.a. Reachability) vs Observability Algebraic Tests (Kalman rank condition & Hautus test) A few
Perspective. ECE 3640 Lecture 11 State-Space Analysis. To learn about state-space analysis for continuous and discrete-time. Objective: systems
ECE 3640 Lecture State-Space Analysis Objective: systems To learn about state-space analysis for continuous and discrete-time Perspective Transfer functions provide only an input/output perspective of
Model reduction via tangential interpolation
Model reduction via tangential interpolation K. Gallivan, A. Vandendorpe and P. Van Dooren May 14, 2002 1 Introduction Although most of the theory presented in this paper holds for both continuous-time
LMIs for Observability and Observer Design
LMIs for Observability and Observer Design Matthew M. Peet Arizona State University Lecture 06: LMIs for Observability and Observer Design Observability Consider a system with no input: ẋ(t) = Ax(t), x(0)
Topic # Feedback Control
Topic #5 6.3 Feedback Control State-Space Systems Full-state Feedback Control How do we change the poles of the state-space system? Or,evenifwecanchangethepolelocations. Where do we put the poles? Linear
Contents lecture 5. Automatic Control III. Summary of lecture 4 (II/II) Summary of lecture 4 (I/II) u y F r. Lecture 5 H 2 and H loop shaping
Contents lecture 5 Automatic Control III Lecture 5 H 2 and H loop shaping Thomas Schön Division of Systems and Control Department of Information Technology Uppsala University. Email: thomas.schon@it.uu.se,
16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 13
16.30/31, Fall 2010 Recitation # 13 Brandon Luders December 6, 2010 In this recitation, we tie the ideas of Lyapunov stability analysis (LSA) back to previous ways we have demonstrated stability - but
EC Control Engineering Quiz II IIT Madras
EC34 - Control Engineering Quiz II IIT Madras Linear algebra Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of A, A, A and A + 4I Find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the following matrices: (a) cos θ sin θ
BALANCING-RELATED MODEL REDUCTION FOR DATA-SPARSE SYSTEMS
BALANCING-RELATED Peter Benner Professur Mathematik in Industrie und Technik Fakultät für Mathematik Technische Universität Chemnitz Computational Methods with Applications Harrachov, 19 25 August 2007
Systems Engineering/Process Control L4
1 / 24 Systems Engineering/Process Control L4 Input-output models Laplace transform Transfer functions Block diagram algebra Reading: Systems Engineering and Process Control: 4.1 4.4 2 / 24 Laplace transform
Pole Placement Design
Department of Automatic Control LTH, Lund University 1 Introduction 2 Simple Examples 3 Polynomial Design 4 State Space Design 5 Robustness and Design Rules 6 Model Reduction 7 Oscillatory Systems 8 Summary
D(s) G(s) A control system design definition
R E Compensation D(s) U Plant G(s) Y Figure 7. A control system design definition x x x 2 x 2 U 2 s s 7 2 Y Figure 7.2 A block diagram representing Eq. (7.) in control form z U 2 s z Y 4 z 2 s z 2 3 Figure
Linear Systems. Linear systems?!? (Roughly) Systems which obey properties of superposition Input u(t) output
Linear Systems Linear systems?!? (Roughly) Systems which obey properties of superposition Input u(t) output Our interest is in dynamic systems Dynamic system means a system with memory of course including
Full State Feedback for State Space Approach
Full State Feedback for State Space Approach State Space Equations Using Cramer s rule it can be shown that the characteristic equation of the system is : det[ si A] 0 Roots (for s) of the resulting polynomial
Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems. Stability of Linear Systems. Sven Laur University of Tartu
Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems Stability of Linear Systems Sven Laur University of Tartu Motivating Example Naive open-loop control r[k] Controller Ĉ[z] u[k] ε 1 [k] System Ĝ[z] y[k] ε 2 [k]
2E1252 Control Theory and Practice
2E1252 Control Theory and Practice Lectre 11: Actator satration and anti wind-p Learning aims After this lectre, yo shold nderstand how satration can case controller states to wind p know how to modify
Topics in control Tracking and regulation A. Astolfi
Topics in control Tracking and regulation A. Astolfi Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The full information regulator problem 3 3 The FBI equations 5 4 The error feedback regulator problem 5 5 The internal model
Course Outline. Higher Order Poles: Example. Higher Order Poles. Amme 3500 : System Dynamics & Control. State Space Design. 1 G(s) = s(s + 2)(s +10)
Amme 35 : System Dynamics Control State Space Design Course Outline Week Date Content Assignment Notes 1 1 Mar Introduction 2 8 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 15 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane
Advanced Control Theory
State Feedback Control Design chibum@seoultech.ac.kr Outline State feedback control design Benefits of CCF 2 Conceptual steps in controller design We begin by considering the regulation problem the task
Raktim Bhattacharya. . AERO 632: Design of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries
. AERO 632: of Advance Flight Control System. Preliminaries Raktim Bhattacharya Laboratory For Uncertainty Quantification Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University. Preliminaries Signals & Systems Laplace
Design of Positive Linear Observers for Positive Systems via Coordinates Transformation and Positive Realization
Design of Positive Linear Observers for Positive Systems via Coordinates Transformation and Positive Realization Juhoon Back 1 Alessandro Astolfi 1 1 Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Chapter 9 Observers, Model-based Controllers 9. Introduction In here we deal with the general case where only a subset of the states, or linear combin
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter 9 Observers,
Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 4 Passivity
p. 1/6 Introduction to Nonlinear Control Lecture # 4 Passivity È p. 2/6 Memoryless Functions ¹ y È Ý Ù È È È È u (b) µ power inflow = uy Resistor is passive if uy 0 p. 3/6 y y y u u u (a) (b) (c) Passive
LECTURE NOTES ON CONTROL
Department of Control for Transportation and Vehicle Systems Faculty of Transportation Engineering and Vehicle Engineering Budapest University of Technology and Economics Tamás Tettamanti PhD., Qiong Lu
Lecture 9 Nonlinear Control Design
Lecture 9 Nonlinear Control Design Exact-linearization Lyapunov-based design Lab 2 Adaptive control Sliding modes control Literature: [Khalil, ch.s 13, 14.1,14.2] and [Glad-Ljung,ch.17] Course Outline
Transfer Functions. Chapter Introduction. 6.2 The Transfer Function
Chapter 6 Transfer Functions As a matter of idle curiosity, I once counted to find out what the order of the set of equations in an amplifier I had just designed would have been, if I had worked with the
= m(0) + 4e 2 ( 3e 2 ) 2e 2, 1 (2k + k 2 ) dt. m(0) = u + R 1 B T P x 2 R dt. u + R 1 B T P y 2 R dt +
ECE 553, Spring 8 Posted: May nd, 8 Problem Set #7 Solution Solutions: 1. The optimal controller is still the one given in the solution to the Problem 6 in Homework #5: u (x, t) = p(t)x k(t), t. The minimum
ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS. Lecture 7 Solution of State Equations 1/77
1/77 ECEN 605 LINEAR SYSTEMS Lecture 7 Solution of State Equations Solution of State Space Equations Recall from the previous Lecture note, for a system: ẋ(t) = A x(t) + B u(t) y(t) = C x(t) + D u(t),
EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Thu. May 14, pm. Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Thu. May 4, 25 5-8 pm Closed book. One page, 2 sides of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 4 2 4 3 6 4 8 5 3
Internal Model Principle
Internal Model Principle If the reference signal, or disturbance d(t) satisfy some differential equation: e.g. d n d dt n d(t)+γ n d d 1 dt n d 1 d(t)+...γ d 1 dt d(t)+γ 0d(t) =0 d n d 1 then, taking Laplace
State Variable Analysis of Linear Dynamical Systems
Chapter 6 State Variable Analysis of Linear Dynamical Systems 6 Preliminaries In state variable approach, a system is represented completely by a set of differential equations that govern the evolution
Introduction to Modern Control MT 2016
CDT Autonomous and Intelligent Machines & Systems Introduction to Modern Control MT 2016 Alessandro Abate Lecture 2 First-order ordinary differential equations (ODE) Solution of a linear ODE Hints to nonlinear
EEE 184: Introduction to feedback systems
EEE 84: Introduction to feedback systems Summary 6 8 8 x 7 7 6 Level() 6 5 4 4 5 5 time(s) 4 6 8 Time (seconds) Fig.. Illustration of BIBO stability: stable system (the input is a unit step) Fig.. step)
Section 5 Dynamics and Control of DC-DC Converters
Section 5 Dynamics and ontrol of D-D onverters 5.2. Recap on State-Space Theory x Ax Bu () (2) yxdu u v d ; y v x2 sx () s Ax() s Bu() s ignoring x (0) (3) ( si A) X( s) Bu( s) (4) X s si A BU s () ( )
Linearization problem. The simplest example
Linear Systems Lecture 3 1 problem Consider a non-linear time-invariant system of the form ( ẋ(t f x(t u(t y(t g ( x(t u(t (1 such that x R n u R m y R p and Slide 1 A: f(xu f(xu g(xu and g(xu exist and
Linear dynamical systems with inputs & outputs
EE263 Autumn 215 S. Boyd and S. Lall Linear dynamical systems with inputs & outputs inputs & outputs: interpretations transfer function impulse and step responses examples 1 Inputs & outputs recall continuous-time
EECS C128/ ME C134 Final Wed. Dec. 15, am. Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators.
Name: SID: EECS C28/ ME C34 Final Wed. Dec. 5, 2 8- am Closed book. Two pages of formula sheets. No calculators. There are 8 problems worth points total. Problem Points Score 2 2 6 3 4 4 5 6 6 7 8 2 Total
State estimation and the Kalman filter
State estimation and the Kalman filter PhD, David Di Ruscio Telemark university college Department of Technology Systems and Control Engineering N-3914 Porsgrunn, Norway Fax: +47 35 57 52 50 Tel: +47 35
Exam in Automatic Control II Reglerteknik II 5hp (1RT495)
Exam in Automatic Control II Reglerteknik II 5hp (1RT495) Date: August 4, 018 Venue: Bergsbrunnagatan 15 sal Responsible teacher: Hans Rosth. Aiding material: Calculator, mathematical handbooks, textbooks
Control engineering sample exam paper - Model answers
Question Control engineering sample exam paper - Model answers a) By a direct computation we obtain x() =, x(2) =, x(3) =, x(4) = = x(). This trajectory is sketched in Figure (left). Note that A 2 = I
Power System Control
Power System Control Basic Control Engineering Prof. Wonhee Kim School of Energy Systems Engineering, Chung-Ang University 2 Contents Why feedback? System Modeling in Frequency Domain System Modeling in
Time Response Analysis (Part II)
Time Response Analysis (Part II). A critically damped, continuous-time, second order system, when sampled, will have (in Z domain) (a) A simple pole (b) Double pole on real axis (c) Double pole on imaginary
9.5 The Transfer Function
Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/2012 0 9.5 The Transfer Function Consider the n-th order linear, time-invariant dynamical system. dy a 0 y + a 1 dt + a d 2 y 2 dt + + a d n y 2 n dt b du 0u +
Dr Ian R. Manchester Dr Ian R. Manchester AMME 3500 : Review
Week Date Content Notes 1 6 Mar Introduction 2 13 Mar Frequency Domain Modelling 3 20 Mar Transient Performance and the s-plane 4 27 Mar Block Diagrams Assign 1 Due 5 3 Apr Feedback System Characteristics
Steady State Kalman Filter
Steady State Kalman Filter Infinite Horizon LQ Control: ẋ = Ax + Bu R positive definite, Q = Q T 2Q 1 2. (A, B) stabilizable, (A, Q 1 2) detectable. Solve for the positive (semi-) definite P in the ARE:
Observability. It was the property in Lyapunov stability which allowed us to resolve that
Observability We have seen observability twice already It was the property which permitted us to retrieve the initial state from the initial data {u(0),y(0),u(1),y(1),...,u(n 1),y(n 1)} It was the property