MULTIPLICATIVE ZAGREB ECCENTRICITY INDICES OF SOME COMPOSITE GRAPHS. Communicated by Ali Reza Ashrafi. 1. Introduction

Transcription

1 Transactions on Combinatorics ISSN (print): , ISSN (on-line): Vol. 3 No. 2 (2014), pp c 2014 University of Isfahan MULTIPLICATIVE ZAGREB ECCENTRICITY INDICES OF SOME COMPOSITE GRAPHS Z. LUO AND J. WU Communicated by Ali Reza Ashrafi Abstract. Let G be a connected graph. The multiplicative Zagreb eccentricity indices of G are defined respectively as 1(G) v V (G) ε2 G(v) and 2(G) uv E(G) εg(u)εg(v), where εg(v) is the eccentricity of vertex v in graph G and ε 2 G(v) (ε G(v)) 2. In this paper, we present some bounds of the multiplicative Zagreb eccentricity indices of Cartesian product graphs by means of some invariants of the factors and supply some exact expressions of 1 and 2 indices of some composite graphs, such as the join, disjunction, symmetric difference and composition of graphs, respectively. 1. Introduction Throughout this paper we consider only undirected simple connected graphs. For terminology and notations are not defined here we refer the reader to West [10]. Let G (V (G), E(G)) be a graph with the vertex set V (G) and the edge set E(G), the number of vertices and edges of G will be denoted by V (G) (or G ) and E(G), respectively. We denote the degree and the neighborhood of a vertex v of G by deg G (v) and N G (v), then deg G (v) N G (v). As usual the distance between vertices u and v of graph G, denoted by d G (u, v), is defined as the number of edges in a shortest path connecting the vertices u and v. For a vertex v of V (G), its eccentricity ε G (v) is the largest distance between v and any other vertex u of G, i.e., ε G (v) max u V (G) d G (u, v). A vertex v V (G) is well-connected if ε G (v) 1, i.e., if it is adjacent to all other vertices of G. We suppose that W denotes the set of all well-connected vertices of G and W i is the set of all well-connected vertices of G i (i 1, 2,..., n), respectively. MSC(2010): Primary: 05C12; Secondary: 05C76. Keywords: Multiplicative Zagreb eccentricity indices; composite operations; Cartesian product. Received: 18 October. 2013, Accepted: 5 April Corresponding author. 21

2 22 Trans. Comb. 3 no. 2 (2014) Z. Luo and J. Wu A topological index is a real number related to a (molecular) graph, it does not rely on the labeling or the pictorial representation of a graph. There are several topological indices be defined in the chemical literatures, especially those vertex-degree-based and vertices-distance-based topological indices, which have been found many applications as means for modeling chemical, pharmaceutical and other properties of molecules. One of the oldest and extensively studied vertex-degree-based topological indices are the first and second Zagreb indices M 1 and M 2, introduced by Gutman and Trinajstić [5], which are applied to study molecular, chirality in quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and quantitative structureproperty relationship (QSPR) analysis, etc. They are defined as M 1 (G) v V (G) (deg G(v)) 2 and M 2 (G) uv E(G) deg G(u)deg G (v). The multiplicative variant of Zagreb indices was introduced by Todeschini et. al. [8], they are defined as 1 (G) v V (G) (deg G(v)) 2 and 2 (G) uv E(G) deg G(u)deg G (v). Gutman in [6] call these indices as multiplicative Zagreb indices. Recently, the topological indices based on vertex eccentricities attracted some attention in Chemistry. In analogy with the ordinary Zagreb indices, the first and second Zagreb eccentricity indices M1 and M 2 of a connected graph G have been introduced by Ghorbani et al. [4] and Vukičević et al. [9] as the revised version of the Zagreb indices. They are defined as M1 (G) v V (G) (ε G(v)) 2 and M 2 (G) uv E(G) ε G(u)ε G (v). Ghorbani and Hosseinzadeh computed the Zagreb eccentricity indices of some composite graphs. Vuki cević and Graovac showed that M 1 (G)/ G M 2 (G)/ E(G) holds for all acyclic and unicyclic graphs and that neither this nor the opposite inequality holds for all bicyclic graphs. For further results of the Zagreb eccentricity indices, we encourage the reader refer to [1, 3, 11]. In analogy with the first and second multiplicative Zagreb indices, the multiplicative Zagreb eccentricity indices of the connected graph G were introduced by De [2] and are defined respectively as 1(G) 2(G) v V (G) uv E(G) ε 2 G(v) v V (G) ε G (u)ε G (v). (ε G (v)) 2, In this paper, we present some bounds of the multiplicative Zagreb eccentricity indices of Cartesian product graphs by means of some invariants of the factors, and supply some exact expressions of 1 and 2 indices of some composite graphs, such as the join, disjunction, symmetric difference and composition of graphs, respectively. 2. Some bounds of 1 and 2 indices of Cartesian product graphs The Cartesian product G 1 G 2 of graphs G 1 and G 2 has the vertex set V (G 1 G 2 ) V (G 1 ) V (G 2 ) and (u 1, u 2 )(v 1, v 2 ) is an edge of G 1 G 2 if and only if u 1 v 1 and u 2 v 2 E(G 2 ) or u 2 v 2 and u 1 v 1 E(G 1 ). If G 1, G 2,..., G n are n( 2) graphs, then we denote G 1 G 2 G n by n G i.

3 Trans. Comb. 3 no. 2 (2014) Z. Luo and J. Wu 23 Lemma 2.1. [4] Let G 1, G 2,..., G n be n graphs. Then deg n G i ((u 1, u 2,..., u n )) ε n G i ((u 1, u 2,..., u n )) deg Gi (u i ), ε Gi (u i ). Theorem 2.2. Let G 1, G 2,..., G n be n nontrivial graphs. Then 1( n G i ) n 2 n n Gi ( 1 (G i ) ) 1 n n j1,j i G j with equality if and only if ε G1 (u 1 ) ε G2 (u 2 ) ε Gn (u n ) for any vertex (u 1, u 2,..., u n ) in n G i. Proof. By Arithmetic-Geometric Mean Inequality, we have ε Gi (u i ) n n n ε Gi (u i ) n ( n (2.1) ε Gi (u i ) ) 1 n. So, from Lemma 2.1 and the inequality (2.1), we can obtain that 1( n G i ) ε 2 n G ((u i 1, u 2,..., u n )) The proof is completed. (u 1,u 2,...,u n) V ( n G i) (u 1,u 2,...,u n) V ( n G i) (u 1,u 2,...,u n) V ( n G i) n 2 n G i ( n ε Gi (u i ) ) 2 n 2 n n ε 2 G i (u i ) n ( 1 (G i ) ) 1 n n j1,j i G j. Theorem 2.3. Let G i (i 1, 2,..., n) does not contain any well-connected vertex. Then n 1( n ( G i ) 1 (G i ) ) n j1,j i G j (2.2) with equality if and only if ε G1 (u 1 ) ε G2 (u 2 ) ε Gn (u n ) for any vertex (u 1, u 2,..., u n ) of n G i. Proof. Note that G i (i 1, 2,..., n) does not contain any well-connected vertex, then for any vertex u i of G i, we have ε Gi (u i ) > 1, i 1, 2,..., n. So, we can obtain that n ε G i (u i ) n ε G i (u i ). By Lemma 2.1 and the same discussing method in Theorem 2.2, it is easy to deduce the inequality (2.2) holds. Similarly, we can also obtain the lower and upper bounds of 2 index of Cartesian product graphs.

4 24 Trans. Comb. 3 no. 2 (2014) Z. Luo and J. Wu Theorem 2.4. Let G 1, G 2,..., G n be n nontrivial graphs. Then 2( n G i ) n 2 n E(G i) ( n j1,j i G j ) n [ n ( 1 (G j ) ) E(G i ) n k1,k i,j G ( k 2 (G i ) ) ] n j1,j i G j 1 n j1,j i with equality if and only if ε G1 (u 1 ) ε G2 (u 2 ) ε Gn (u n ) for any vertex (u 1, u 2,..., u n ) in n G i. If n 2, set n k1,k i,j G k 1. Theorem 2.5. Let G i (i 1, 2,..., n) does not contain any well-connected vertex. Then n [ n 2( n ( G i ) 1 (G j ) ) E(G i ) n k1,k i,j G ( k 2 (G i ) ) ] n j1,j i G j j1,j i with equality if and only if ε G1 (u 1 ) ε G2 (u 2 ) ε Gn (u n ) for any vertex (u 1, u 2,..., u n ) of n G i. If n 2, set n k1,k i,j G k and 2 indices of join graphs The join G 1 +G 2 of two graphs G 1 and G 2 with disjoint vertex sets V (G 1 ) and V (G 2 ) and edge sets E(G 1 ) and E(G 2 ) is the graph union G 1 G 2 together with all the edges joining V (G 1 ) and V (G 2 ). The definition generalizes to the case of n 3 graphs in a straightforward manner. In order to finish calculations of the first and second multiplicative Zagreb eccentricity indices of join of graphs, we first present two key Lemmas as bellow. Lemma 3.1. [4, 7] Let G 1, G 2,..., G n be n graphs. Then E(G 1 + G G n ) [ E(G i ) + deg G1 +G 2 + +G n (v) deg Gi (v) + j1,i<j j1,j i G j. G i G j ], Lemma 3.2. For any vertex v V (G i )(1 i n) n V (G i) V (G 1 + G G n ), we have 1, if v W i ; ε G1 +G 2 + +G n (v) 2, if v V (G i ) \ W i. Theorem 3.3. Let G G 1 + G G n. 0 W i G i, i 1, 2,..., n. Then 1(G) 4 n ( G i W i ), 2(G) 2 n [2 E(G i) W i ( G i 1)+( G i W i ) n j1,j i G j ]. Proof. By the definition of 1 index, Lemmas 3.1 and 3.2, we have 1(G) ε 2 G(v) V (G)\ n Wi 4 n ( G i W i ). v V (G) v n W i v V (G)\ n W i

5 Trans. Comb. 3 no. 2 (2014) Z. Luo and J. Wu 25 2(G) uv E(G) n [1 2 n ε G (u)ε G (v) v W i deg G (v) 2 v V (G i )\W i deg G (v) v V (G) (ε G (v)) deg G (v) v V (G i )\W deg (v) i G ] n v V (G 2 i )\W [deg i Gi (v)+ n j1,j i G j ] n [ v V (G i )\W deg i Gi (v)+ n v V (G i )\W i j1,j i G j ] 2 2 n [2 E(G i) W i ( G i 1)+( G i W i ) n j1,j i G j ]. This completes the proof. Corollary 3.4. Let ng G } + {{ + G } and the set of well-connected vertices of G is W. Then n times 1(nG) 4 n( G W ), 2(nG) 2 [2n E(G) +2(n 2) G 2 +n W n 2 G W )]. Corollary 3.5. If none of G i, i 1, 2,..., n contains well-connected vertices, then 1(G 1 + G G n ) 4 n G i, 2(G 1 + G G n ) 4 n [ E(G i) + n j1,i<j G i G j ] and 2 indices of disjunction and symmetric difference of two graphs The disjunction G 1 G 2 of two graphs G 1 and G 2 is the graph with vertex set V (G 1 ) V (G 2 ) and edge set E(G 1 G 2 ) {(u 1, u 2 )(v 1, v 2 ) u 1 v 1 E(G 1 ) or u 2 v 2 E(G 2 )}. Lemma 4.1. [4, 7] Let G 1 and G 2 be two graphs, then E(G 1 G 2 ) E(G 1 ) G E(G 2 ) G E(G 1 ) E(G 2 ), deg G1 G 2 ((u, v)) G 2 deg G1 (u) + G 1 deg G2 (v) deg G1 (u)deg G2 (v). The following lemma is obvious by means of the definition of disjunction of two graphs. Lemma 4.2. Let G 1 and G 2 be two graphs, W i is the set of well-connected vertices of G i and 0 W i V (G i ), i 1, 2. Then 1, if u W 1 and v W 2 ; ε G1 G 2 ((u, v)) 2, otherwise. Theorem 4.3. Let G 1 and G 2 be two graphs. Then 1(G 1 G 2 ) 4 ( G 1 G 2 W 1 W 2 ), 2(G 1 G 2 ) 2 [2( E(G 1) G E(G 2 ) G E(G 1 ) E(G 2 ) ) W 2 G 2 s(w 1 ) W 1 G 1 s(w 2 )+s(w 1 )s(w 2 )],

6 26 Trans. Comb. 3 no. 2 (2014) Z. Luo and J. Wu where s(w i ) v W i deg Gi (v), i 1, 2. Proof. From the definitions of multiplicative Zagreb eccentricity indices 1, 2 and Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2, we have 1(G 1 G 2 ) 2(G 1 G 2 ) (u,v) V (G 1 G 2 ) ε 2 G 1 G 2 ((u, v)) 4 V (G 1 G 2 )\(W 1 W 2 ) 4 ( G 1 G 2 W 1 W 2 ), 2 (u,v) V (G 1 G 2 ) (u,v) V (G 1 G 2 )\(W 1 W 2 ) (ε G1 G 2 ((u, v))) deg G 1 G 2 ((u,v)) 2 deg G 1 G 2 ((u,v)) (u,v) V (G 1 G 2 )\(W 1 W 2 ) (u,v) V (G 1 G 2 )\(W 1 W 2 ) deg G 1 G 2 ((u,v)) 2 [ (u,v) V (G 1 G 2 ) deg G 1 G 2 ((u,v)) (u,v) W 1 W 2 deg G1 G 2 ((u,v))] 2 [2 E(G 1 G 2 ) u W 1 v W 2 ( G 2 deg G1 (u)+ G 1 deg G2 (v) deg G1 (u)deg G2 (v))] 2 [2( E(G 1) G E(G 2 ) G E(G 1 ) E(G 2 ) ) W 2 G 2 s(w 1 ) W 1 G 1 s(w 2 )+s(w 1 )s(w 2 )]. 2 2 The proof is completed. Corollary 4.4. If G 1 or G 2 does not contain any well-connected vertex, then 1(G 1 G 2 ) 4 G 1 G 2, 2(G 1 G 2 ) 4 [ E(G 1 ) G E(G 2 ) G E(G 1 ) E(G 2 ) ]. The symmetric difference G 1 G 2 of two graphs G 1 and G 2 is the graph with vertex set V (G 1 ) V (G 2 ) and edge set {(u 1, u 2 )(v 1, v 2 ) u 1 v 1 E(G 1 ) or u 2 v 2 E(G 2 ) but not both}. Lemma 4.5. [4] Let G 1 and G 2 be two graphs, then E(G 1 G 2 ) E(G 1 ) G E(G 2 ) G E(G 1 ) E(G 2 ), deg G1 G 2 ((u, v)) G 2 deg G1 (u) + G 1 deg G2 (v) 2deg G1 (u)deg G2 (v). For any vertex (u, v) V (G 1 G 2 ), by the definition of symmetric difference of two graphs, we have ε G1 G 2 ((u, v)) 2. So, by Lemma 4.5, it is easy to obtain the following theorem. Theorem 4.6. Let G 1 and G 2 be two graphs. Then 1(G 1 G 2 ) 4 G 1 G 2, 2(G 1 G 2 ) 4 [ E(G 1 ) G E(G 2 ) G E(G 1 ) E(G 2 ) ].

7 Trans. Comb. 3 no. 2 (2014) Z. Luo and J. Wu and 2 indices of composition of two graphs The composition G 1 [G 2 ] of graphs G 1 and G 2 with disjoint vertex sets V (G 1 ) and V (G 2 ), edge sets E(G 1 ) and E(G 2 ) is the graph with vertex set V (G 1 [G 2 ]) V (G 1 ) V (G 2 ) and edge set E(G 1 [G 2 ]) {(u 1, v 1 )(u 2, v 2 ) u 1 u 2 E(G 1 ) or (u 1 u 2 and v 1 v 2 E(G 2 ))}. By means of the definition as above, it is easy to deduce the following lemma. Lemma 5.1. Let W i be the set of well-connected vertices in graph G i, i 1, 2. Then we have 1, if u W 1 and v W 2 ; ε G1 [G 2 ]((u, v)) 2, if u W 1 and v V (G 2 ) \ W 2 ; ε G1 (u), otherwise. Lemma 5.2. [4, 7] Let G 1 and G 2 be two graphs, then E(G 1 [G 2 ]) E(G 1 ) G E(G 2 ) G 1, deg G1 [G 2 ]((u, v)) G 2 deg G1 (u) + deg G2 (v). Theorem 5.3. Let G 1 and G 2 be two graphs and W i be the set of well-connected vertices in G i, i 1, 2. Then 1(G 1 [G 2 ]) 4 W 1 ( G 2 W 2 ) ( 1(G 1 ) ) G 2, 2(G 1 [G 2 ]) 2 W 1 [ G 2 ( G 2 W 2 )( G 1 1)+2 E(G 2 ) W 2 ( G 2 1)] ( 1(G 1 ) ) E(G 2 ) ( 2 (G 1 ) ) G 2 2. Proof. By the definitions of 1 index and 2 index, Lemmas 5.1 and 5.2, we arrive at 1(G 1 [G 2 ]) ε 2 G 1 [G 2 ]((u, v)) (u,v) V (G 1 [G 2 ] u W 1,v W 2 u W 1,v V (G 2 )\W 2 4 W 1 ( G 2 W 2 ) ( ε 2 G 1 (u) u V (G 1 )\W 1 4 W 1 ( G 2 W 2 ) ( 1(G 1 ) ) G 2. u V (G 1 )\W 1,v V (G 2 ) ) G2 ε 2 G 1 (u) 2(G 1 [G 2 ]) (ε G1 [G 2 ]((u, v))) deg G 1 [G 2 ] ((u,v)) (u,v) V (G 1 [G 2 ]) 2 [ G2 degg1 (u)+deg G2 (v)] u W 1,v V (G 2 )\W 2 ( εg1 (u) ) [ G 2 deg G1 (u)+deg G2 (v)] u V (G 1 )\W 1,v V (G 2 )

8 28 Trans. Comb. 3 no. 2 (2014) Z. Luo and J. Wu 2 u W 1,v V (G 2 )\W [ G 2 deg 2 G1 (u)+deg (v)] G2 u V (G 1 )\W 1,v V (G 2 ) ( εg1 (u) ) deg G2 (v) u V (G 1 )\W 1,v V (G 2 ) 2 [ G 2 ( G 2 W 2 ) u W deg 1 G1 (u)+ W 1 v V (G 2 )\W deg 2 G2 (v)] ( (ε G1 (u)) degg1 (u) ) G 2 2 ( ε 2 G 1 (u) u V (G 1 )\W 1 u V (G 1 )\W 1 ( εg1 (u) ) G 2 deg G1 (u) ) 1 2 v V (G 2 ) deg G 2 (v) 2 W 1 [ G 2 ( G 2 W 2 )( G 1 1)+2 E(G 2 ) W 2 ( G 2 1)] ( 2(G 1 ) ) G 2 2 ( 1(G 1 ) ) E(G 2 ). This completes the proof. Corollary 5.4. If W 1 or W 2 V (G 2 ), i.e., G 1 does not contain any well-connected vertex or G 2 is a complete graph. Then 1(G 1 [G 2 ]) ( 1(G 1 ) ) G 2 and 2 (G 1 [G 2 ]) ( 1(G 1 ) ) E(G 2 ) ( 2 (G 1 ) ) G 2 2. Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank the referee for helpful comments and suggestions. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No ), the Scientific Research Programs of the Higher Education Institution of Xinjiang (XJEDU2012I37, XJEDU2012I38) and the Science Foundation of Changji University (2012YJYB003). References [1] K. C. Das, D. W. Lee and A. Graovac, Some properties of the Zagreb eccentricity indices, Ars Math. Contemp., 6 (2013) [2] N. De, On multiplicative Zagreb eccenticity indices, South Asian J. Math., 2 no. 6 (2012) [3] Z. Du, B. Zhou and N. Trinajstić, Extremal properties of the Zagreb eccentricity indices, Croat. Chem. Acta, 85 no. 3 (2012) [4] M. Ghorbani and M. A. Hosseinzadeh, A new version of Zagreb indices, Filomat, 26 (2012) [5] I. Gutman and N. Trinajstić, Graph theory and molecular orbitals, Total π electron energy of alternant hydrocarbons, Chem. Phys. Lett. 17 (1972) [6] I. Gutman, Multipicative Zagreb indices of trees, Bull. Internat. Math. Virt. Inst., 1 (2011) [7] M. H. Khalifeh, H. Yousefi-Azari and A. R. Ashrafi, The first and second Zagreb indices of some graph operations, Discrete Appl. Math., 157 (2009) [8] R. Todeschini and V. Consonni, New local vertex invariants and molecular descriptors based on functions of the vertex degree, MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem., 64 (2010) [9] D. Vuki cević and A. Graovac, Note on the comparison of the first and second normalized Zagreb eccentricity indices, Acta Chim. Slov. 57 (2010) [10] D. B. West, Introduction to Graph Theory, second ed., Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, [11] R. Xing, B. Zhou and N. Trinajstić, On Zagreb eccentricity indices, Croat. Chem. Acta, 84 no. 4 (2011)

9 Trans. Comb. 3 no. 2 (2014) Z. Luo and J. Wu 29 Zhaoyang Luo Department of Mathematics, Changji University, Changji , China School of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan , China sdmlzy@163.com Jianliang Wu School of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan , China jlwu@sdu.edu.cn