Compactness and weak solutions to time fractional PDEs


 Jewel Melton
 3 months ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Compactness and weak solutions to time fractional PDEs Lei Li (With JianGuo Liu) Department of Mathematics Duke University Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
2 Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives 3 Compactness Criteria 4 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
3 Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives 3 Compactness Criteria 4 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
4 Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives 3 Compactness Criteria 4 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
5 Outline Outline 1 Introduction 2 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives 3 Compactness Criteria 4 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
6 Introduction Outline 1 Introduction 2 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives 3 Compactness Criteria 4 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
7 Introduction Memory effects Memory effects are ubiquitous in physics and engineering ( particles in heat bath; soft matter with viscoelasticity) Onesided convolution is usually used to model the memory effects. A typical example is the generalized Langevin equation (GLE) (Mori, Kubo, Zwangzig): ẋ = v, t m v = V (x) γ(t s)v(s)ds + R(t) t 0 R(t) is a random noise satisfying the socalled fluctuationdissipation theorem: E(R(t 0 )R(t 0 + t)) = me(v(t 0 ) 2 )γ( t ) = kt γ( t ). Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
8 Introduction GLE: Memory effects often lead to fractional calculus For absolutely continuous functions, the Caputo derivative is D α c x = 1 t ẋ(s) Γ(1 α) 0 (t s) α ds, Our recent work (Li, Liu and Lu) considers the overdamped regime of GLE driven by fractional noise, leading to the following fractional SDE model: Dc 2 2H x = V (x) + ḂH. D α c x is the Caputo derivative, which corresponds to the t t0 γ(t s)v(s)ds term in the GLE model. Ḃ H is the fractional noise. For a physical system, the Caputo derivative and the fractional noise must appear in pairs. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
9 Introduction Time FPDEs: Some probabilistic interpretations Hairer, Iyer et. al. recently showed that some intermediate time behaviors of celluclar flows can be described by time fractional diffusion equations with Caputo derivatives. (In other words, in certain scaling regime, the solutions to an advectiondiffusion equations converge weakly to the solution of time fractional diffusion equations) Meerschaert and Scheffer noticed that the solution to the time fractional diffusion equation with order γ with initial data u 0 = f (x) admits the following probabilistic representation: u(x,t) = E x (f (W Et )) where W is a Brownian motion and E t is an inverse γstable subordinator independent of β. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
10 Introduction Fractional calculus Integrals of order γ > 0: J γ f (t) = 1 t (t s) γ 1 f (s)ds Γ(γ) 0 The fractional integral is just the convolution between θ(t)f and g γ (t) = θ(t) 1 Γ(γ) tγ 1. θ(t) is the Heaviside step function. Example: J 2 f = t 0 τ0 f (s)ds dτ = t 0 (t s)f (s)ds For derivatives, RiemannLiouville and Caputo types are widely used: If γ (n 1,n), d n t D γ rl f (t) = 1 Γ(n γ) dt n 0 f (s) (t s) γ+1 n ds, Dγ cf (t) = If γ = n, they are defined as the usual derivative f (n) (t). 1 t Γ(n γ) 0 f (n) (s) ds (t s) γ+1 n Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
11 Introduction Properties and issues for the traditional definition The integrals {J γ } form a semigroup. D γ rl = D n J γ (n 1) and D γ c = J γ (n 1) D n. If α γ > 0: D γ rl J α = D γ cj α = J α γ. The RiemannLiouville operator and Caputo derivative are left inverse of integrals, but in general not the right inverse: JDf = f (t) f (0). γ D rl1 0. This is due to a jump at t = 0 for causality. γ Dc 1 = 0. The Caputo derivative removes the singularity at t = 0. The dynamics is counted from t = 0+. The definition of Caputo derivative requires higher order derivatives. intuitively, if we want to define γth order derivative, we do not need it to be nth order differentiable. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
12 Introduction Some recent definitions to extend Caputo derivatives In the book by Kilbas et. al, the Caputo derivative with order γ (0,1) was defined using RiemannLiouville derivatives. In a recent work by Allen, Caffarelli and Vasseur, the Caputo derivative was defined by an integral form. In the work by Gorenflo, Luchko and Yamamoto, the Caputo derivative was extended to functions in some Sobolev spaces using functional analysis tools. Li and Liu extended the definition of Caputo derivatives to a certain class of locally integrable functions based on a convolution group. This definition reveals the underlying structures and is theoretically convenient. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
13 Introduction Fractional differential equations Caputo derivatives count the dynamics from t = 0 + and shares many similarities with usual derivatives, so more suited to initial value problems. Fractional ODE theory has been well established. Books by Kilbas, and Diethelm for FODEs with Caputo derivatives. Recently, Feng, Li, Liu and Xu studied 1D autonomous FODEs using a generalized definition. The monotonicity and blowup have been discussed thoroughly. Fractional SDEs: for physical systems, fractional noise must be paired with Caputo derivatives while for other models, they may not be paired. Very little rigorous study of FPDEs. The time fractional diffusion equations have been studied by M. Taylor, and Caffarelli et. al. Many papers used the old definition of Caputo derivatives to study other types of fractional PDEs, but are not mathematically rigorous. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
14 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives Outline 1 Introduction 2 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives 3 Compactness Criteria 4 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
15 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives A convolution group and a generalized definition of Caputo derivatives In the book by Gel fand and Shilov, integrals and derivatives of arbitrary order for a distribution supported on [0, ) are defined to as ϕ (α) = ϕ g α, g α := tα 1 + Γ(α), α C. Here t + = max(t,0) = θ(t)t and tα 1 + Γ(α) must be understood as distributions for R(α) 0. We use this group {g α : α C} (with more convenient forms) in our work to define the modified RiemannLiouville calculus. The derivatives are now inverse of integral operators. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
16 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives A convolution group and a generalized definition of Caputo derivatives The extended Caputo derivative: Definition 1 Let 0 < γ < 1. Consider u L 1 loc (0,T ;R) and there is u 0 R such that 1 lim t t 0 t 0 u(s) u 0 ds = 0. The γth order Caputo derivative of u is a distribution in D (,T ) with support in [0,T ), given by ( ) Dcu γ := g γ (u u 0 )θ(t). For β ( 1,0), g β (t) = 1 Γ(1+β ) D(θ(t)tβ ), where D means the distributional derivative in D. One can check that this agrees with the traditional definition of Caputo derivatives if u is absolutely continuous. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
17 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives Right derivatives Another group given by C := { g α : g α (t) = g α ( t),α R}. Clearly, supp g (,0]. Right Caputo derivatives: Definition 2 Let 0 < γ < 1. Consider u L 1 loc (,T ) such that T is a Lebesgue point. The γth order right Caputo derivative of u is a distribution in D (R) with support in (,T ], given by D γ c;t u := g γ (θ(t t)(u(t) u(t ))). If u is absolutely continuous on (a,t ), a < T, then D γ c;t u = 1 Γ(1 γ) T t (s t) γ u(s)ds, t (a,t ). (1) Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
18 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives Integration by parts using right derivatives Lemma 3 Let u,v be absolutely continuous on (0,T ), then we have the integration by parts formula for Caputo derivatives T 0 T (Dcu)(v(t) γ v(t ))dt = (u(t) u(0+))( D γ c;t v)dt. 0 This relation also holds if u L 1 loc (0,T ) so that u(0+) exists and v Cc (,T ). Remark 1 If γ 1, it is not hard to see that D γ c;t u u (t) weakly. Hence, the right derivatives carry a natural negative sign. Remark 2 Assuming that u, v are smooth functions, this identity can be verified easily using traditional definitions of left and right Caputo derivatives. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
19 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives Weak Caputo derivatives for functions valued in Banach spaces? Fix T > 0 and introduce the following sets: { } D := v v : Cc ((,T );R) B is a bounded linear operator. In other words, D consists of functionals from C c ((,T );R) to B. Definition of weak Caputo derivatives: Definition 4 Let B be a Banach space and u L 1 loc ([0,T );B). Let u 0 B. We define the weak Caputo derivative of u associated with initial data u 0 to be D γ cu D such that for any test function ϕ C c ((,T );R), T Dcu,ϕ γ := (u u 0 )θ(t)( D T γ c;t ϕ)dt = (u u 0 ) D γ c;t ϕ dt. 0 Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
20 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives Some basic properties of the weak Caputo derivatives supp D γ cu [0,T ). If B = R d and u(0+) = u 0, then the Caputo derivative is then given by D γ cu = g γ ((u u 0 )θ(t)). Let γ (0,1). If Dcu γ L 1 loc ([0,T );B), then u(t) = J γ (Dcu) γ = u t (t s) γ 1 D Γ(γ) cu γ ds, a.e. on (0,T ). 0 where the integral is understood as the Lebesgue integral. If u is absolutely continuous, then Dcu γ L 1 loc ([0,T );B) for γ (0,1) and D γ cu(t) = 1 t u(s) ds, t [0,T ). (2) Γ(1 γ) 0 (t s) γ Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
21 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives An important lemma Proposition 1 Let γ (0,1). If u : [0,T ) B is C 1 ((0,T );B) C 0 ([0,T );B), and u E(u) R is a C 1 convex functional on B, then ( Dcu(t) γ 1 u(t) u(0) t ) u(t) u(s) = Γ(1 γ) t γ + γ ds 0 (t s) γ+1 (3) and D γ ce(u(t)) D u E(u),D γ cu, (4) where D u E( ) : B B is the Fréchet differential and, is understood as the dual pairing between B and B. The proof is very straightforward by observing E(u(t)) E(b) D u E(u(t)) (u(t) b), b B. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
22 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives Regularity improvements by fractional integral Proposition 2 Let B be a Banach space and T > 0 and γ (0,1). Suppose u L 1 loc ((0,T );B) and f = Dcu γ with an assigned initial value u 0 B. (i) If f L ((0,T );B), then u is Hölder continuous with order γ ε for any ε (0,γ). If f is continuous, then u is γth order Hölder continuous. (ii) If further there exists δ > 0, such that f C m,β ([δ/4,t ];B), with β [0,1], then C m,β +γ ([δ,t ];B), β + γ < 1, u C m+1,β +γ 1 ([δ,t ];B), β + γ > 1, C m,1;1 ([δ,t ];B), β + γ = 1. (iii) If there exists δ > 0, such that f H s ((δ/4,t );B) (the Sobolev space W 1,s ((δ/4,t );B)), then u H s+γ ((δ,t );B) The claims are not true in general if δ = 0. For example, f = 1, then we have u = u 0 + t γ /Γ(1 + γ). There is an intrinsic singularity at t = 0. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
23 Compactness Criteria Outline 1 Introduction 2 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives 3 Compactness Criteria 4 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
24 Compactness Criteria The traditional AubinLions Lemma and its variants The traditional AubinLionsSimon lemma: Let X 0,X,X 1 be three Banach spaces such that X 0 is compactly embedded into X and X is continuously embedded into X 1. Let W = {u L p ([0,T ];X 0 ) u t L q ([0,T ];X 1 )}. (i) If p <, W is relatively compact in L p ([0,T ];X). (ii) If p = and q > 1, W is relatively compact in C([0,T ];X). In the work by Chen, Jungel and Liu, several variants of AubinLions lemma have been summarized and proved. The results here apply to many common nonlinear PDEs. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
25 Compactness Criteria The role of AubinLions Lemma in parabolic equations The AubinLions Lemma is a powerful tool for establishing the existence of weak solutions to nonlinear PDEs with diffusion. As a trivial but illustrating example, consider u t = u, x Ω; u = 0, x Ω. Suppose u t=0 = u 0 L 2 (Ω). The proof of existence of weak solutions is as following (though I did not introduce the definition of weak solutions): Find a common basis to L 2 and H 1 0, {w k}. Expand u 0 = k α k w k. Let u m = m k=1 c k(t)w k. Solve the ODE system t u m,w j = u m,w j, j = 1,...,m. We have 1 2 t u m 2 2 = u m 2 2, which yields the uniform boundedness of u m in L (L 2 ) and L 2 (H0 1). One can estimate t u m L 2 (H 1 ). Then, the AubinLions lemma yields the relative compactness of {u m } in L 2 (L 2 ). The limit of a subsequence is then a weak solution. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
26 Compactness Criteria FPDEs? Some a priori estimates and motivation Consider the simple time fractional diffusion equation with Dirichlet condition: D γ cu = u, x Ω. Formula is available (See the notes by M. Taylor). Show the existence of solutions without using the formula? We do a priori estimates. u Dcudx γ = u 2 dx. Using the important lemma about convex functional: This implies that 1 2 Dγ c u 2 2 u 2 2 (t) + 2 Γ(γ) t 0 u Dcudx γ = u 2 dx (t s) γ 1 u(s) 2 2 ds u Goal: use the boundedness of t 0 (t s)γ 1 u(s) 2 2 ds and L (0, ;L 2 ) to find a certain compactness criterion and then the existence of weak solution follows. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
27 Compactness Criteria The first compactness criteria We propose two compactness criteria, which could be useful at different situations (see the examples later). Theorem 5 Let T > 0,γ (0,1) and p [1, ). Let M,B,Y be Banach spaces. M B compactly and B Y continuously. Suppose W L 1 loc ((0,T );M) satisfies: (i) There exists C 1 > 0 such that u W, sup J γ ( u p M ) = t (0,T ) p sup t (0,T ) 1 Γ(γ) t 0 (t s) γ 1 u p M (s)ds C 1. (ii) There exist r ( 1+pγ, ) [1, ) and C 3 > 0 such that u W, there is an assignment of initial value u 0 for u so that the weak Caputo derivative satisfies: Dcu γ L r ((0,T );Y ) C 3. Then, W is relatively compact in L p ((0,T );B). Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
28 Compactness Criteria The second compactness criteria Theorem 6 Let T > 0,γ (0,1) and p [1, ). Let M,B,Y be Banach spaces. M B compactly and B Y continuously. Suppose W L 1 loc ((0,T );M) satisfies: (i). There exists r 1 [1, ) and C 1 > 0 such that u W, sup J γ ( u r 1 M ) = t (0,T ) sup t (0,T ) 1 Γ(γ) t 0 (t s) γ 1 u r 1 M (s)ds C 1. (ii). There exists p 1 (p, ], W is bounded in L p 1((0,T );B). (iii). There exist r 2 [1, ) and C 2 > 0 such that u W, there is an assignment of initial value u 0 for u so that the weak Caputo derivative satisfies: D γ cu L r 2 ((0,T );Y ) C 2, Then, W is relatively compact in L p ((0,T );B). Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
29 Compactness Criteria Sketch of the proof 1: The implication of boundness fractional integral 1 Let γ (0,1). If sup t t (0,T ) Γ(γ) 0 (t s)γ 1 f (s) p Mds <, then f L p ((0,T );M). Proof: T0 f p M (s)ds T 1 γ T 0 (T s) γ 1 f p M ds. The results can not essentially be improved: Suppose µ is the middle 1/3 Cantor measure that is Ahlforsregular of degree (or dimension) α = ln2/ln3. Then, if γ > 1 α, 1 sup t s γ 1 dµ(s) <. t [0,1] 0 Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
30 Compactness Criteria Sketch of the proof 2: Time shift estimates Proposition 3 Fix T > 0. Let B be a Banach space and γ (0,1). Suppose u L 1 loc ((0,T );B) has a weak Caputo derivative Dcu γ L p ((0,T );B) associated with initial value u 0 B. If pγ 1, we set r 0 = and if pγ < 1, we set r 0 = p/(1 pγ). Then, there exists C > 0 independent of h and u such that { Ch γ+ 1 r p 1 D γ τ h u u L r ((0,T h);b) cu L p ((0,T );B), r [p,r 0 ), Ch γ Dcu γ (5) L p ((0,T );B), r [1,p]. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
31 Compactness Criteria Sketch of the proof 3: Some key lemmas The first: Lemma 7 Suppose M,B,Y are three Banach spaces. M B Y with the embedding M B be compact. 1 p < and (i). W is bounded in L p ((0,T );M); (ii). τ h f f L p ((0,T h);y ) 0 uniformly as h 0. Then, W is relatively compact in L p ((0,T );B). The second: Lemma 8 Let 1 < p 1. If W is a bounded set in L p 1((0,T );B) and relatively compact in L 1 loc ((0,T );B), then it is relatively compact in Lp ((0,T );B) for all 1 p < p 1. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
32 Examples of fractional PDEs Outline 1 Introduction 2 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives 3 Compactness Criteria 4 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
33 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations Outline 1 Introduction 2 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives 3 Compactness Criteria 4 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
34 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations Time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations The first toy problem is: Dcu γ + (uu) ( u 2 ) = u, x Ω, u Ω = 0, x Ω. Ω R d (d = 2,3) is an open bounded domain with smooth boundary. The nonconservative form D γ cu + u u + ( u) u + ( u)u = u is the time fractional Burgers equation. For the usual time derivative, it is also called the EulerPoincare equation. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
35 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations Weak formulation Using the definition of weak Caputo derivative, we can formulate the definition of weak solutions as following Definition 9 Let γ (0,1). We say u L ((0,T );L 2 (Ω)) L 2 ((0,T );H0 1 (Ω)) with D γ cu L q 1((0,T );H 1 (Ω)), q 1 = min(2,4/d), is a weak solution with initial data u 0 L 2 (Ω), if u(x,s) u 0, D T γ c;t ϕ ϕ : u u dxdt 0 Ω 1 T T ϕ u 2 dxdt = u ϕ dxdt, (6) 2 0 Ω 0 Ω for any ϕ C c ([0,T ) Ω;R d ). We say a weak solution is a regular weak solution if u(0+) = u 0. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
36 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations Existence of weak solutions The idea is to use Galerkin s method to form an approximating function sequence and then apply our first compactness criteria. Pick a common basis {w k } k=1 of L2 (Ω) and H 1 0 (Ω), orthonormal in L2. By the uniform boundedness principle, P m : v m k=1 is uniformly bounded in both H 1 0 and L2. α k w k Decompose u 0 = k=1 αk w k (x) in L 2 (Ω). Consider u m (t) = m k=1 ck m(t)w k satisfying D γ cu m,w j + (u m u m ),w j u m 2,w j = u m,w j, u m (0) = m k=1 c k m(0)w k = m k=1 α k w k. (7) Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
37 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations Existence of weak solutions (continued) The equation for u m is reduced to an FODE for the coefficient c m. By the result in Feng, Li, Liu and Xu: u m C 1 ((0, );H 1 0 (Ω)) C0 ([0, );H 1 0 (Ω)). Note that u m (0) H 1 0 (Ω) though u 0 is not necessarily in H 1 0. Using the important lemma about convex functional, we have the energy estimates: t u m L ((0, );L 2 (Ω)) u 0 2, sup (t s) γ 1 u m 2 2 ds 1 0 t< 0 2 Γ(γ) u 0 2. Using the fact that P m is uniformly bounded, we find ( ) Dcu γ m L q 1 (0,T ;H 1 ) C, q 4 1 = min 2,. d The second compactness criterion then yields a convergent subsequence in L 2 (0,T ;L 2 ), and the limit is a weak solution. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
38 Examples of fractional PDEs 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Outline 1 Introduction 2 Definition of weak Caputo derivatives 3 Compactness Criteria 4 Examples of fractional PDEs A special case of time fractional compressible NavierStokes equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
39 Examples of fractional PDEs 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations As another toy problem, we consider { D γ c ρ + (ρ c) = ρ, x R 2, c = ρ, x R 2. Initial condition is ρ(x,0) = ρ 0 0. Definition 10 We say ρ L (0,T ;L 1 (R 2 )) L (0,T ;L 2 (R 2 )) L 2 (0,T ;H 1 (R 2 )) is a weak solution with initial data ρ 0 0 and ρ 0 L 1 (R 2 ) L 2 (R 2 ), if (i). ρ(x,t) 0. (ii). There exists q (1,2) such that D γ cu L q 1((0,T );W 2,q (R 2 )) for any q 1 (1, ). (iii). For any ϕ C c ([0,T ) R 2 ), u(x,s) u 0, D T γ c;t ϕ ϕ ( ( ) 1 ρ)ρ dxdt = u, ϕ. 0 R 2 We say a weak solution is a regular weak solution if u(0+) = u 0. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
40 Examples of fractional PDEs 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations The regularized system To prove the existence of weak solutions, we construct an approximating sequence. One standard idea is to consider a regularized system. J(x) C c (R 2 ), J(x) 0 and R 2 J(x)dx = 1, J ε = 1 ε 2 J ( x ε ). { D γ c ρ ε + (ρ ε c ε ) = ρ ε, c ε = ρ ε J ε, Initial data ρ ε 0 = ρ 0 J ε, which has the same L 1 norm as ρ 0. The question is that how we can show the existence of strong solutions of the regularized system. The answer is to show the existence of mild solution and then show the mild solution is a strong solution with the regularity proved. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
41 Examples of fractional PDEs 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Linear time fractional advection diffusion equations Initila data ρ(x,0) = ρ 0. D γ cρ + (ρa(x,t)) = ρ, By the Laplace transform, we have (A = ): t ρ(x,t) = E γ ( t γ A)ρ 0 + γ τ γ 1 E γ( τ γ A)( (ρa) t τ )dτ. 0 An important observation is E γ( τ γ A) f 2 H α C R 2 E γ( τ γ k 2 ) 2 k 2 ˆf k 2 (1 + k 2α )dk Cτ γ R 2 ˆf k 2 (1 + k 2α )dk = Cτ γ f 2 H α. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
42 Examples of fractional PDEs 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Linear time fractional advection diffusion equations Lemma 11 Suppose a(x, t) is smooth and all the derivatives are bounded. Then: (i) If ρ 0 L 1 (R 2 ) H α (R 2 ), then T > 0, the equation has a unique mild solution in C([0,T ];H α (R 2 )). (ii) For the unique mild solution in (i), T > 0, ρ C 0,γ ([0,T ];H α (R 2 )) C ((0,T );H α (R 2 )). The mild solution is a strong solution in C([0,T ];H α 2 ) so that: D γ cρ = 1 t ρ(s) ds = (ρa(x,t)) + ρ. Γ(1 γ) 0 (t s) γ (iii) If ρ 0 H 1 (R 2 ) L 1 (R 2 ) and ρ 0 0, then ρ(x,t) 0, and ρ dx = ρ R 2 R 2 0 dx. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
43 Examples of fractional PDEs 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Strong solutions of the regularized system Initial data ρ ε 0 = ρ 0 J ε. { D γ c ρ ε + (ρ ε c ε ) = ρ ε, c ε = ρ ε J ε, Step 1: Existence and uniqueness of mild solutions. This is similar as what we do for the linear equations. Step 2: Let c ε = ( ) 1 ρ ε and consider the linear problem: D γ cv + (v c ε ) = v. By the results for linear advectiondiffusion equation, we know this has strong solutions, which then must be the mild solution ρ ε. Also, it is nonnegative and preserves L 1 norm. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
44 Examples of fractional PDEs 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations Energy estimates and compactness By the standard Sobolev embeddings and the important lemma about convex energy functional: 1 q Dγ c ρ ε q q (ρ ε ) q 1,D γ cρ ε, we have Lemma 12 Suppose ρ 0 0 satisfies that ρ 0 L 1 L 2 and M 0 = ρ 0 1 is sufficiently small. Then, ρ ε 0 and for any fixed T > 0, ρ ε L (0,T ;L q ) C(q,T ), q [1,2], sup 0 t T t 0 (t s) γ 1 ρ ε 2 2ds C(T ). Further, there exists q (1,2) such that D γ cρ ε is uniformly bounded in L q 1(0,T ;W 2,q (R 2 )) for any q 1 (1, ). The first compactness criterion then yields a convergent subsequence, which turns out to be a weak solution. Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42
45 Examples of fractional PDEs 2D time fractional KellerSegel equations This is a joint work with Prof. JianGuo Liu: L. Li and J. Liu Some compactness criteria for weak solutions of time fractional PDEs. Preprint. Other references J. Simon, Compact sets in the space L p (0,T ;B). Annali di Matematica pura ed applicata L. Li, J. Liu and J. Lu Fractional stochastic differential equations satisfying fluctuationdissipation theorem. J. Stat. Phys. Y. Feng, L. Li, J. Liu and X. Xu Continuous and discrete one dimensional autonomous fractional ODEs. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B Thank you for your attention! Lei Li (Math Dept) Compactness and fractional PDEs October 11, / 42