EPR Paradox and Bell s Inequality
|
|
- Calvin Patrick
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EPR Paradox and Bell s Inequality James Cross
2 1 Introduction The field of quantum mechanics is practically synonymous with modern physics. The basics of quantum theory are taught in every introductory level physics class, and its applications can be seen in the fields of chemistry, mathematics, and even biology. Quantum theory has redefined how we look at the universe around, and it has caused us to view every day phenomena with new understanding. While quantum theory and its applications are accepted by any practicing scientist during the 21st century, that was not always the case. In the first half of the 20th century, there was an intense debate among the physics community on this new and bizarre quantum theory that redefined our understanding of how the universe works. In this paper we will outline the thought experiment made by physicists Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, where in their paper Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? We will then examine how experimental data and Bell s Inequality were used to prove that quantum theory is, in fact, complete. In this paper, the terms quantum, quantum theory, and quantum mechanics will be used interchangeably. 2 EPR Paradox The EPR Paradox is the name given to the conclusion of the thought experiment given in the 1935 paper posted by physicists Einstein, Podolsky, and Rose (denoted EPR for the rest of this paper) in their paper Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? In this paper, EPR argued that quantum mechanics, though a successful description of nature, could not represent a final, complete theory. They asserted that in a complete theory, there is an element corresponding to each element of reality (cite). EPR gave the following condition of completeness: A sufficient condition for the reality of a physical quantity is the possibility of predicting it with certainty, without disturbing the system. To illustrate this, they presented a thought experiment to show that quantum mechanics cannot be a complete description of reality. 2.1 EPR Thought Experiment The following is an outline of their thought experiment. Suppose some event occurs on the origin of the x axis of some arbitrary number line (Figure 1) and emits two identical particles I 1 and I 2. I 1 travels in the positive x-direction with momentum p 1 while I 2 travels in the negative x-direction with momentum p 2 (Figure 1). Figure 1: 1
3 2.2 Uncertainty If the total momentum of the system was initially p = 0, then by the conservation of momentum we get that (1) p 1 = p 2, and since the particles have identical mass, it follows that (2) x 1 = x 2 (except at t = 0). From the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics, we have the following equation (3) x 1 p 1 h where h is Planc s constant Within quantum theory, it is asserted that measuring an object collapses its wave function, driving the uncertainty of the property to zero. Thus, measurement of an object directly affects the qualities of the object. By measuring either the position or momenta of the particle, the other quantity is changed. 2.3 Measurements As stated previously, within quantum mechanics, measurements disturb the object being measured. If position is measured on a particle, then a measurement of its momentum would yield a difference result than if momentum were measured first. Within the proposed experiment, it is possible that measuring the position of I 2 could cause I 2 to send out information to also collapse the wavefunction of I 1 so that they remain identical particles. However, we can make these particles arbitrarily far apart before we measure them. Since information can only travel as fast as the speed of light, it is possible to out them in a positioon where both measurements can be made before I 1 can collapse the wave function of I 2. Suppose a measurement was made on I 2 to determine its position x 2. Then due to equation (2), we can predict x 1 with certainty without having disturbed I 1, so x 1 becomes real. The same argument follows for predicting p 1 from p 2. In quantum, measurements are represented by applying operators. By uncertainty, the position and momentum measurements are not communitive, and thus equal some non-zero number: 1 ]=i h, 2 ]=i h However, the operators for the position of one particle and the momentum of the other do commute, so their operator is zero. 2 ]=0 1 ]=0 Let ˆx = xˆ 1 xˆ 2 be the difference of the position operators and let ˆp = pˆ 1 pˆ 2 be the sum of the momentum operators. We can work out the commutator of ˆx and ˆp to find that it is zero. [ ˆx, ˆp]= 1 ]- 2 ]+ 2 ]- 1 ]=i h-i h+0-0=0 [5] 2
4 2.4 Outcome Since the commutator zero, then both the position and momentum can be determined. This, however, is a contradiction with the uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics. EPR concludes that either quantum theory is incomplete, or that that I 1 can instantaneously send information to I2, which would require a complete overhaul of the understanding of the universe. This is the EPR Paradox. 3 Bell s Inequality For the following thirty years after the EPR Paradox was published, quantum theory stood as a useful descriptor of the universe, but one that heavily debated on its completeness. This changed in 1964 when John Bell published a paper titled On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox.The essence of Bells theorem is that quantum mechanical probabilities cannot arise from the ignorance of local pre-existing variables. In other words, if we want to assign pre-existing (but hidden) properties to explain probabilities in quantum measurements, these properties must be non-local. This non-locality is of the worst possible kind: an agent with access to the non-local variables would be able to transmit information instantly to a distant location, thus violating relativistic causality, or in Einstein s words, spooky action at a distance. 3.1 Locality and Reality Let us define a local theory as a one where the outcomes of an experiment on a system are independent of the actions performed on a different system which has no causal connection with the first. For example, the temperature of this room is independent on whether I choose to wear purple socks today. Einsteins relativity provides a stringent condition for causal connections: if two events are outside their respective light cones, there cannot be any causal connection among them. [2] Let us define a real theory as one whose experiments uncover properties that are preexisting. In other words, in a real theory it is meaningful to assign a property to a system (e.g. the position of a particle) independently of whether the measurement of such property 2 is carried out. [2] Modern formulations of quantum mechanics must incorporate Bells result at their core: either they refuse the idea that measurements uncover preexisting properties, or they must make use of non-local properties. In the latter case, they must also introduce some censorship mechanism to prevent the use of hidden variables to transmit information. An example of the first formulation is the conventional Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which states that the properties arise from the interaction between the quantum system and the measurement apparatus, they are not pre-existing, i.e. unperformed experiments have no results. An example of the second formulation is the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation of quantum mechanics that assumes that particle trajectories are hidden variables (they exist independently of position measurements). 3
5 a b c a b b c a c Table 1: Possible outcomes In its simplest form, Bell s theorem states that quantum mechanics is either non-local or non-real, it cannot be both. To show this, Bell derived a basic inequality that satisfied all local and real theories. He then showed that all experiments in quantum mechanics violate this inequality, and therefore quantum cannot be both. Below we will show Bell s inequality and then how it leads to this conclusion. 3.2 Bell s Inequality Suppose we take a particle in state X, and subject it to an experiment with two possible outcomes: pass and fail (call it test a). We also have a second test b, and a third test c (Figure 2). Three identical particles (with some state X)are then put through the three tests, with the first particle going to test a, the second the test b, and the third to test c. There are 8 possible outcomes of these three tests. Using 0 and 1 to represent failure and pass respectively, we can make Table 1 to show all possible outcomes. Under lo- Figure 2: cality, we assume that a given state X corresponds to one and only one row in this table. From the three tests, we now look for three specific outcomes: pass a and fail b (a b),pass b and fail c (b c), and pass a and fail c (a c). These outcomes are denoted in Table 1 by the + symbol. Notice that whenever a c is true, either a b or b c must also be true. However, there are scenarios in which both b c and a b can occur independently. From this observation, we derive the following formula: 4
6 (3) P(a b)+p(b c) P(a c)[2] That is, the probability of a c occuring is always less than or equal to the probability of a b occuring plus the probablity of b c occuring. This is Bell s Inequality, which we will use to prove Bell s Theorum. 3.3 Bell s Theorum To prove Bell s Theorum, we now provide a quantum system which violates the above inequality. Suppose that some event hapens at the orgin and two particles (α 1 and α 2 ) in a singlet state (entangled) were sent out in opposite directions (much like in Figure 1). Due to their entanglement, α 1 will always have opposite spin of α 2. Let us assume that the spin of these particles is due to some inherient charactaristc or state of the particle, that is, each particle has difinite spin before it is detected. Now set up two detectors so that the spin of both particles can be measured. Depending on the orientation of the particles spin relative to a detector it will be deflected up or down. Its paired twin will have opposite spin and be deflected in the opposite direction. The particles are spin up or spin down. Let us consider the following three scenerios: 1. Particles detectable with spin up at 0 but not at Particles detectable with spin up at 45 but not at Particles detectable with spin up at 0 but not at 90 One can determine if a particle is not detectable with spin up at a given angle by looking at the particle it is paired with. If a particle is detectable with spin up at some angle then the particle it is paired with cannot be because they have opposite spin. Count the detections of paired particles α 1 and α 2 that fall into the following three categories in which all detections are with spin up. 1. α 1 detectable at 0 and its pair α 2 at 45 (a b) 2. α 1 detectable at 45 and its pair α 2 at 90 (b c) 3. α 1 detectable at 0 and its pair α 2 at 90 (a c) These three categories fit the constraints of (3). From the literature (cite), it has been determined that quantum can predict the probability that two particles will be detected at spin up with an angle φ between the detectors as follows. [3] (4) 1 2 (sin(φ 2 ))2 5
7 Substituting in (3), we get Which evaluates as 1 2 (sin(45 2 )) (sin(45 2 ))2 1 2 (sin(90 2 )) which violates Bell s Inequality. 4 Conclusions This proves Bells theorem: all local real theories must satisfy Bell s inequality (3) which is violated by quantum mechanics. Then, quantum mechanics cannot be a local counterfactual theory: it must either be nonreal (as in the Copenhagen interpretation) or non-local (as in the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation). References [1] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Phys. Rev, 47, 777, [2] J. S. Bell. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox,. On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys, 38, 447, [3] A. Peres. Unperformed experiments have no results. Am. J. Phys, 46, 745, [4] A. Aspect, P. Grangier, G. Rodger. Experimental Realization of EinsteinPodolsky- Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bells Inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett, 49, 91, [5] G. Ghirardi. On a recent proof of nonlocality without inequalities. Found. Phys, 41, 1309,
EPR Paradox Solved by Special Theory of Relativity
EPR Paradox Solved by Special Theory of Relativity Justin Lee June 20 th, 2013 Abstract This paper uses the special theory of relativity (SR) to introduce a novel solution to Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen (EPR)
More informationEinstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and Bell s inequalities
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and Bell s inequalities Jan Schütz November 27, 2005 Abstract Considering the Gedankenexperiment of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen as example the nonlocal character of quantum
More informationViolation of Bell Inequalities
Violation of Bell Inequalities Philipp Kurpiers and Anna Stockklauser 5/12/2011 Quantum Systems for Information Technology Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox (1935) Goal: prove that quantum mechanics is incomplete
More informationBell s Theorem. Ben Dribus. June 8, Louisiana State University
Bell s Theorem Ben Dribus Louisiana State University June 8, 2012 Introduction. Quantum Theory makes predictions that challenge intuitive notions of physical reality. Einstein and others were sufficiently
More informationIntroduction to Bell s theorem: the theory that solidified quantum mechanics
Introduction to Bells theorem: the theory that solidified quantum mechanics Jia Wang Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, 930 N. University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (Received November 30,
More informationClosing the Debates on Quantum Locality and Reality: EPR Theorem, Bell's Theorem, and Quantum Information from the Brown-Twiss Vantage
Closing the Debates on Quantum Locality and Reality: EPR Theorem, Bell's Theorem, and Quantum Information from the Brown-Twiss Vantage C. S. Unnikrishnan Fundamental Interactions Laboratory Tata Institute
More informationThe nature of Reality: Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in QM
The nature of Reality: Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in QM Michele Caponigro ISHTAR, Bergamo University Abstract From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR
More informationON EPR PARADOX, BELL S INEQUALITIES AND EXPERIMENTS THAT PROVE NOTHING
May 1, 010 15:59 WSPC/INSTRUCTION FILE ignatovich epr ON EPR PARADOX, BELL S INEQUALITIES AND EXPERIMENTS THAT PROVE NOTHING IGNATOVICH V.K. FLNP JINR, 6 Joliot-Curie, Dubna, Moscow region, 11980, Russia
More informationQ8 Lecture. State of Quantum Mechanics EPR Paradox Bell s Thm. Physics 201: Lecture 1, Pg 1
Physics 56: Lecture Q8 Lecture State of Quantum Mechanics EPR Paradox Bell s Thm Physics 01: Lecture 1, Pg 1 Question Richard Feynman said, [the double-slit experiment] has in it the heart of quantum mechanics;
More informationJ = L + S. to this ket and normalize it. In this way we get expressions for all the kets
Lecture 3 Relevant sections in text: 3.7, 3.9 Total Angular Momentum Eigenvectors How are the total angular momentum eigenvectors related to the original product eigenvectors (eigenvectors of L z and S
More informationPhotons uncertainty removes Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Abstract
quant-ph/0202175 Photons uncertainty removes Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox Daniele Tommasini Departamento de Física Aplicada, Área de Física Teórica, Universidad de Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain (Dated:
More information3/10/11. Which interpreta/on sounds most reasonable to you? PH300 Modern Physics SP11
3// PH3 Modern Physics SP The problems of language here are really serious. We wish to speak in some way about the structure of the atoms. But we cannot speak about atoms in ordinary language. Recently:.
More informationSinglet State Correlations
Chapter 23 Singlet State Correlations 23.1 Introduction This and the following chapter can be thought of as a single unit devoted to discussing various issues raised by a famous paper published by Einstein,
More informationWhat is spin? Thomas Pope and Werner Hofer. School of Chemistry Newcastle University. Web: wernerhofer.eu
What is spin? Thomas Pope and Werner Hofer School of Chemistry Newcastle University Web: wernerhofer.eu Email: werner.hofer@ncl.ac.uk 1 Overview Introduction 2 Overview Introduction Standard model 3 Overview
More informationarxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 1 Jun 2013
A simple proof of Bell s inequality Lorenzo Maccone Dip. Fisica, Univ. of Pavia, via Bassi 6, I-27100 Pavia, Italy Bell s theorem is a fundamental result in quantum mechanics: it discriminates between
More informationEPR Paradox and Bell Inequalities
Chapter 24 EPR Paradox and Bell Inequalities 24.1 Bohm Version of the EPR Paradox Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) were concerned with the following issue. Given two spatially separated quantum systems
More informationQuantum Entanglement. Chapter Introduction. 8.2 Entangled Two-Particle States
Chapter 8 Quantum Entanglement 8.1 Introduction In our final chapter on quantum mechanics we introduce the concept of entanglement. This is a feature of two-particle states (or multi-particle states) in
More informationProof of absence of spooky action at a distance in quantum correlations
PRAMANA cfl Indian Academy of Sciences Vol. 59, No. 2 journal of August 2002 physics pp. 295 301 Proof of absence of spooky action at a distance in quantum correlations C S UNNIKRISHNAN Gravitation Group,
More informationCosmology Lecture 2 Mr. Kiledjian
Cosmology Lecture 2 Mr. Kiledjian Lecture 2: Quantum Mechanics & Its Different Views and Interpretations a) The story of quantum mechanics begins in the 19 th century as the physicists of that day were
More informationSolving the Einstein Podolsky Rosen puzzle: The origin of non-locality in Aspect-type experiments
Front. Phys., 2012, 7(5): 504 508 DOI 10.1007/s11467-012-0256-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Solving the Einstein Podolsky Rosen puzzle: The origin of non-locality in Aspect-type experiments Werner A. Hofer Department
More informationWe can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.!
PuNng Local Realism to the Test We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.! - Albert Einstein! Day 39: Ques1ons? Revisit EPR-Argument Tes1ng Local Realism
More informationLogical difficulty from combining counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell theorems
Logical difficulty from combining counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell theorems ABSTRACT Louis Sica 1,2 1 Chapman University, Orange, CA & Burtonsville, MD, USA 2 Inspire Institute Inc., Alexandria, VA, USA
More informationBell s Theorem 1964 Local realism is in conflict with quantum mechanics
Bell s Theorem 1964 Local realism is in conflict with quantum mechanics the most profound discovery in science in the last half of the twentieth century. For a technical presentation search Youtube.com
More informationA proof of Bell s inequality in quantum mechanics using causal interactions
A proof of Bell s inequality in quantum mechanics using causal interactions James M. Robins, Tyler J. VanderWeele Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health Richard
More informationBell s inequalities and their uses
The Quantum Theory of Information and Computation http://www.comlab.ox.ac.uk/activities/quantum/course/ Bell s inequalities and their uses Mark Williamson mark.williamson@wofson.ox.ac.uk 10.06.10 Aims
More information4.1 Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
Chapter 4 Quantum Spookiness As we have seen in the previous chapters, many aspects of quantum mechanics run counter to our physical intuition, which is formed from our experience living in the classical
More informationToday s Outline - April 18, C. Segre (IIT) PHYS Spring 2017 April 18, / 23
Today s Outline - April 18, 2017 C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 406 - Spring 2017 April 18, 2017 1 / 23 Today s Outline - April 18, 2017 The Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen paradox C. Segre (IIT) PHYS 406 - Spring 2017
More informationLecture 29 Relevant sections in text: 3.9
Lecture 29 Relevant sections in text: 3.9 Spin correlations and quantum weirdness: Spin 1/2 systems Consider a pair of spin 1/2 particles created in a spin singlet state. (Experimentally speaking, this
More informationarxiv:quant-ph/ v4 17 Jan 2005
Understanding Popper s experiment Tabish Qureshi Department of Physics, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi-5, India An experiment proposed by Karl Popper is considered by many to be a crucial test of quantum
More informationQUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND ITS ASPECTS. Dileep Dhakal Masters of Science in Nanomolecular Sciences
QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND ITS ASPECTS Dileep Dhakal Masters of Science in Nanomolecular Sciences Jacobs University Bremen 26 th Nov 2010 Table of Contents: Quantum Superposition Schrödinger s Cat Pure vs.
More informationHardy s Paradox. Chapter Introduction
Chapter 25 Hardy s Paradox 25.1 Introduction Hardy s paradox resembles the Bohm version of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox, discussed in Chs. 23 and 24, in that it involves two correlated particles,
More informationLogical difficulty from combining counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell theorems
Logical difficulty from combining counterfactuals in the GHZ-Bell theorems Louis Sica Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866; and Inspire Institute Inc., Alexandria, V2303, USA E-mail: lousica@jhu.edu In
More informationOn a proposal for Quantum Signalling
On a proposal for Quantum Signalling Padmanabhan Murali Pune, India pmurali1000@gmail.com Ver1 : 21st Nov 2015 Abstract Present understanding of non-possibility of Quantum communication rests on analysis
More informationA very efficient two-density approach to atomistic simulations and a proof of principle for small atoms and molecules
A very efficient two-density approach to atomistic simulations and a proof of principle for small atoms and molecules Werner A Hofer and Thomas Pope School of Natural and Environmental Sciences Newcastle
More informationTimeline: Bohm (1951) EPR (1935) CHSH (1969) Bell (1964) Theory. Freedman Clauser (1972) Aspect (1982) Weihs (1998) Weinland (2001) Zeilinger (2010)
1.EPR paradox 2.Bohm s version of EPR with spin ½ particles 3.Entangled states and production 4.Derivation of CHSH inequality - S parameter for mixed and entangled state 5. Loopholes 6.Experiments confirming
More informationThe Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought-experiment and Bell s theorem
PHYS419 Lecture 0 The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought-experiment and Bell s theorem 1 The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought-experiment and Bell s theorem As first shown by Bell (1964), the force of the arguments
More informationLecture 4. QUANTUM MECHANICS FOR MULTIPLE QUBIT SYSTEMS
Lecture 4. QUANTUM MECHANICS FOR MULTIPLE QUBIT SYSTEMS 4.1 Multiple Qubits Next we consider a system of two qubits. If these were two classical bits, then there would be four possible states,, 1, 1, and
More information226 My God, He Plays Dice! Entanglement. Chapter This chapter on the web informationphilosopher.com/problems/entanglement
226 My God, He Plays Dice! Entanglement Chapter 29 20 This chapter on the web informationphilosopher.com/problems/entanglement Entanglement 227 Entanglement Entanglement is a mysterious quantum phenomenon
More informationCollapse versus correlations, EPR, Bell Inequalities, Cloning
Collapse versus correlations, EPR, Bell Inequalities, Cloning The Quantum Eraser, continued Equivalence of the collapse picture and just blithely/blindly calculating correlations EPR & Bell No cloning
More informationNON HILBERTIAN QUANTUM MECHANICS ON THE FINITE GALOIS FIELD
1 BAO HUYNH 12524847 PHYSICS 517 QUANTUM MECHANICS II SPRING 2013 TERM PAPER NON HILBERTIAN QUANTUM MECHANICS ON THE FINITE GALOIS FIELD 2 Index table Section Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Algebraic construction
More informationContextuality and the Kochen-Specker Theorem. Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
Contextuality and the Kochen-Specker Theorem Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics by Christoph Saulder 19. 12. 2007 Interpretations of quantum mechanics Copenhagen interpretation the wavefunction has no
More informationThe controlled-not (CNOT) gate exors the first qubit into the second qubit ( a,b. a,a + b mod 2 ). Thus it permutes the four basis states as follows:
C/CS/Phys C9 Qubit gates, EPR, ell s inequality 9/8/05 Fall 005 Lecture 4 Two-qubit gate: COT The controlled-not (COT) gate exors the first qubit into the second qubit ( a,b a,a b = a,a + b mod ). Thus
More informationThe Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought experiment and Bell s theorem
PHYS419 Lecture 0 The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought experiment and Bell s theorem 1 The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought experiment and Bell s theorem As first shown by Bell (1964), the force of the arguments
More informationBell s Theorem...What?! Entanglement and Other Puzzles
Bell s Theorem...What?! Entanglement and Other Puzzles Kyle Knoepfel 27 February 2008 University of Notre Dame Bell s Theorem p.1/49 Some Quotes about Quantum Mechanics Erwin Schrödinger: I do not like
More informationFor the seminar: Ausgewählte Probleme der Quantenmechanik Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, WS 2011/2012 Christian Knobloch a
Bohmian Mechanics For the seminar: Ausgewählte Probleme der Quantenmechanik Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, WS 2011/2012 Christian Knobloch a0846069 1 Introduction In the following lines the
More informationEinstein was Correct: A Deeper Level of Quantum Theory is Needed
International Journal of Advanced Research in Physical Science (IJARPS) Volume, Issue 7, July 05, PP -8 ISSN 349-7874 (Print) & ISSN 349-788 (Online) www.arcjournals.org Einstein was Correct: A Deeper
More informationTopic 3: Bohr, Einstein, and the EPR experiment
Bohr, Einstein, and the EPR experiment http://www.wuthrich.net/ MA Seminar: Philosophy of Physics Hilbert spaces Barrett, The Quantum Mechanics of Minds and Worlds, Appendix Quantum states are represented
More informationAn axiomatic approach to Einstein's boxes
An axiomatic approach to Einstein's boxes Thomas V Marcella a) Department of Physics and Applied Physics, University of Massachusetts-Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, 01854 Received The fallacies inherent
More information1.1.1 Bell Inequality - Spin correlation
January 8, 015 Lecture IV 1.1.1 Bell Inequality - Spin correlation Consider the final spin singlet state of the decay η 0 µ + µ We suppose that the η 0 decays and the muon and µ + travel in opposite directions,
More informationON THE EINSTEIN PODOLSKY ROSEN PARADOX* I. Introduction
Physics Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 195 200, 1964 Physics Publishing Co. Printed in the United States ON THE EINSTEIN PODOLSKY ROSEN PARADOX* J. S. BELLt Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
More informationUnderstanding Long-Distance Quantum Correlations
Understanding Long-Distance Quantum Correlations arxiv:quant-ph/0608079v1 9 Aug 2006 Louis Marchildon Département de physique, Université du Québec, Trois-Rivières, Qc. Canada G9A 5H7 email: marchild a
More informationOn a proposal for Quantum Signalling
On a proposal for Quantum Signalling Padmanabhan Murali Pune, India pmurali1000@gmail.com Ver1 : 21st Nov 2015 Abstract Present understanding of non-possibility of Quantum communication rests on analysis
More informationQuantum mechanics and reality
Quantum mechanics and reality Margaret Reid Centre for Atom Optics and Ultrafast Spectroscopy Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne, Australia Thank you! Outline Non-locality, reality and quantum
More informationAnomaly in sign function - probability function integration III
Anomaly in sign function - probability function integration III Han GEURDES Address Geurdes Datascience, KvK 645, C vd Lijnstraat 64, 593 NN, Den Haag Netherlands Abstract E-mail :han.geurdes@gmail.com
More informationReview of Quantum Mechanics, cont.
Review of Quantum Mechanics, cont. 1 Probabilities In analogy to the development of a wave intensity from a wave amplitude, the probability of a particle with a wave packet amplitude, ψ, between x and
More informationHonors 225 Physics Study Guide/Chapter Summaries for Final Exam; Roots Chapters 15-18
Honors 225 Physics Study Guide/Chapter Summaries for Final Exam; Roots Chapters 15-18 Chapter 15 Collapsing the Wave If a particle is in a quantum superposition state (that is, a superposition of eigenfunctions
More informationLaboratory 1: Entanglement & Bell s Inequalities
Laboratory 1: Entanglement & Bell s Inequalities Jose Alejandro Graniel Institute of Optics University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, U.S.A Abstract This experiment purpose was to study the violation
More informationClassical Bell s Inequalities. Vesselin C. Noninski
Classical Bell s Inequalities Vesselin C. Noninski vesselin.noninski@verizon.net Abstract An example of a classical system violating Bell s inequalities is discussed. Existence of a classical system violating
More informationComments on There is no axiomatic system for the. quantum theory. Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) J.
Noname manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Comments on There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory J. Acacio de Barros the date of receipt and acceptance should be inserted later Abstract
More informationHow does it work? QM describes the microscopic world in a way analogous to how classical mechanics (CM) describes the macroscopic world.
Today Quantum Mechanics (QM) is used in the university and beyond on a regular basis: Chemical bonds NMR spectroscopy The laser (blue beam in Blue-ray player; red beam in a DVD player for example) The
More informationThe Relativistic Quantum World
The Relativistic Quantum World A lecture series on Relativity Theory and Quantum Mechanics Marcel Merk University of Maastricht, Sept 24 Oct 15, 2014 Relativity Quantum Mechanics The Relativistic Quantum
More information3 Bananaworld. 3.1 Einstein Podolsky Rosen bananas
3 Bananaworld The really remarkable thing about our quantum world is the existence of nonlocal correlations correlations between events at separate locations that can t be explained by either of the two
More informationA Geometrical Model of Fermion Spin Correlations
EJTP 9, No. 27 (2012) 111 120 Electronic Journal of Theoretical Physics A Geometrical Model of Fermion Spin Correlations Robert A. Close Portland, OR, USA Received 6 February 2012, Accepted 16 July 2012,
More informationA single quantum cannot be teleported
1 quant-ph/010060 A single quantum cannot be teleported Daniele Tommasini Departamento de Física Aplicada, Universidad de Vigo, 3004 Ourense, Spain Due to the Heisemberg uncertainty principle, it is impossible
More informationBell Inequality and Many-Worlds Interpretation
Bell Inequality and Many-Worlds Interpretation L. Vaidman Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel It is argued that the lesson we should
More informationMeasuring Quantum Teleportation. Team 10: Pranav Rao, Minhui Zhu, Marcus Rosales, Marc Robbins, Shawn Rosofsky
Measuring Quantum Teleportation Team 10: Pranav Rao, Minhui Zhu, Marcus Rosales, Marc Robbins, Shawn Rosofsky What does Quantum Mechanics have to do with Teleportation? QM exhibits non-locality What is
More informationHas CHSH-inequality any relation to EPR-argument?
arxiv:1808.03762v1 [quant-ph] 11 Aug 2018 Has CHSH-inequality any relation to EPR-argument? Andrei Khrennikov International Center for Mathematical Modeling in Physics, Engineering, Economics, and Cognitive
More informationA Superluminal communication solution based on Four-photon entanglement
A Superluminal communication solution based on Four-photon entanglement Jia-Run Deng cmos001@163.com Abstract : Based on the improved design of Four-photon entanglement device and the definition of Encoding
More informationQuantum correlations from wave-particle unity and locality: Resolution of the EPR puzzle
Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Volume 5 no 3, 000 363 Quantum correlations from wave-particle unity and locality: Resolution of the EPR puzzle C. S. Unnikrishnan Gravitation Group, Tata Institute
More informationTwo-State Vector Formalism
802 Two-State Vector Formalism Secondary Literature 9. E. Merzbacher: Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York 1970) 10. S. Gasiorowicz: Quantum Physics (Wiley, New York 1996) 11. A. Sommerfeld: Lectures
More informationEPR paradox, Bell inequality, etc.
EPR paradox, Bell inequality, etc. Compatible and incompatible observables AA, BB = 0, then compatible, can measure simultaneously, can diagonalize in one basis commutator, AA, BB AAAA BBBB If we project
More informationDavid Bohm s Hidden Variables
ccxxii My God, He Plays Dice! David Bohm s Hidden Variables Hidden Variablesccxxiii David Bohm s Hidden Variables David Bohm is perhaps best known for new experimental methods to test Einstein s supposed
More informationResponse to Wiseman, Rieffel, and Cavalcanti on Bell s 1964 Paper
Response to Wiseman, Rieffel, and Cavalcanti on Bell s 1964 Paper Edward J. Gillis October 6, 2016 Abstract Wiseman has claimed that Bell was wrong in stating that determinism was inferred rather than
More informationCan Everettian Interpretation Survive Continuous Spectrum?
Can Everettian Interpretation Survive Continuous Spectrum? Bryce M. Kim 2016/02/21 Abstract This paper raises a simple continuous spectrum issue in many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, or Everettian
More informationQuantum information and quantum computing
Middle East Technical University, Department of Physics January 7, 009 Outline Measurement 1 Measurement 3 Single qubit gates Multiple qubit gates 4 Distinguishability 5 What s measurement? Quantum measurement
More informationEinstein, Podolsky and Rosen Paradox, Bell Inequalities and the Relation to the de Broglie-Bohm Theory
Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen Paradox, Bell Inequalities and the Relation to the de Broglie-Bohm Theory Bachelor Thesis for the degree of Bachelor of Science at the University of Vienna submitted by Partener
More informationEntanglement. arnoldzwicky.org. Presented by: Joseph Chapman. Created by: Gina Lorenz with adapted PHYS403 content from Paul Kwiat, Brad Christensen
Entanglement arnoldzwicky.org Presented by: Joseph Chapman. Created by: Gina Lorenz with adapted PHYS403 content from Paul Kwiat, Brad Christensen PHYS403, July 26, 2017 Entanglement A quantum object can
More informationHolism and Non-separability Applied to Quantum Mechanics
James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current Honors College Summer 2011 Holism and Non-separability Applied to Quantum Mechanics Catherine E. Nisson James Madison
More informationEntanglement and information
Ph95a lecture notes for 0/29/0 Entanglement and information Lately we ve spent a lot of time examining properties of entangled states such as ab è 2 0 a b è Ý a 0 b è. We have learned that they exhibit
More informationRelativistically invariant extension of the de Broglie-Bohm theory of quantum mechanics
Relativistically invariant extension of the de Broglie-Bohm theory of quantum mechanics Chris Dewdney and George Horton Division of Physics, University of Portsmouth. Portsmouth PO1 DT. England Abstract.
More informationEPR, Bell Inequalities, Cloning (continued);
EPR, Bell Inequalities, Cloning (continued); then possibly spatiotemporal distinguishability, and time measurement with photon pairs FIRST: EPR & Bell Some hidden-variable models No cloning Lecture 5:
More information6.896 Quantum Complexity Theory September 9, Lecture 2
6.96 Quantum Complexity Theory September 9, 00 Lecturer: Scott Aaronson Lecture Quick Recap The central object of study in our class is BQP, which stands for Bounded error, Quantum, Polynomial time. Informally
More informationRUNS: A_B, A_B', A'_B,
A. Fine, 2013 THE BELL THEOREM The Bell theorem is a demonstration that a plausible way of picturing (or modeling) how the results of measurements occur, when made precise, leads to definite relations
More informationSpatial Locality: A hidden variable unexplored in entanglement experiments
Spatial Locality: A hidden variable unexplored in entanglement experiments Ramzi Suleiman a Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushy Avenue 199, Haifa 3498838, Israel & Department of
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Mechanics
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics R. J. Renka Department of Computer Science & Engineering University of North Texas 03/19/2018 Postulates of Quantum Mechanics The postulates (axioms) of quantum mechanics
More informationProbabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling. Abstract
Probabilistic exact cloning and probabilistic no-signalling Arun Kumar Pati Quantum Optics and Information Group, SEECS, Dean Street, University of Wales, Bangor LL 57 IUT, UK (August 5, 999) Abstract
More informationBohmian particle trajectories contradict quantum mechanics
ohmian particle trajectories contradict quantum mechanics Michael Zirpel arxiv:0903.3878v1 [quant-ph] 23 Mar 2009 May 27, 2018 bstract The ohmian interpretation of quantum mechanics adds particle trajectories
More informationLab. 1: Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities. Abstract
December 15, 2008 Submitted for the partial fulfilment of the course PHY 434 Lab. 1: Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Mayukh Lahiri 1, 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester,
More informationProblems with/failures of QM
CM fails to describe macroscopic quantum phenomena. Phenomena where microscopic properties carry over into macroscopic world: superfluidity Helium flows without friction at sufficiently low temperature.
More informationD. Bouwmeester et. al. Nature (1997) Joep Jongen. 21th june 2007
al D. Bouwmeester et. al. Nature 390 575 (1997) Universiteit Utrecht 1th june 007 Outline 1 3 4 5 EPR Paradox 1935: Einstein, Podolsky & Rosen Decay of a π meson: π 0 e + e + Entangled state: ψ = 1 ( +
More informationThe wavefunction and quantum jumps
ydrogen atom in 3D Today From ast Time Electron has a particle and wave nature and is spread out over space Wave nature must interfere constructively to exist Satisfies 3 conditions for constructive interference
More informationINTRODUCTORY NOTES ON QUANTUM COMPUTATION
INTRODUCTORY NOTES ON QUANTUM COMPUTATION Keith Hannabuss Balliol College, Oxford Hilary Term 2009 Notation. In these notes we shall often use the physicists bra-ket notation, writing ψ for a vector ψ
More informationIs Faster-Than-Light Communication Possible?
Is Faster-Than-Light Communication Possible? Raymond W. Jensen Department of Mathematics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame IN 46556 rwjst4@alumni.nd.edu Abstract. It is shown here using elementary
More informationCounterfactuals in Quantum Mechanics
132 Counterfactuals in Quantum Mechanics Counterfactuals in Quantum Mechanics Lev Vaidman Counterfactuals in quantum mechanics appear in discussions of (a) nonlocality, (b) pre- and post-selected systems,
More informationQuantum Mechanics and No-Hidden Variable Theories
Quantum Mechanics and No-Hidden Variable Theories Comparing the Bell, Kochen-Specker and Free Will Theorems June 18, 2014 Pieter Steijlen Bachelor Thesis Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Dennis Dieks Institute for
More informationQuantum mysteries revisited again
Quantum mysteries revisited again P. K. Aravind a) Physics Department, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts 01609 Received 30 April 2002; accepted 21 May 2004 This paper describes
More informationB. BASIC CONCEPTS FROM QUANTUM THEORY 93
B. BASIC CONCEPTS FROM QUANTUM THEORY 93 B.5 Superposition B.5.a Bases 1. In QM certain physical quantities are quantized, such as the energy of an electron in an atom. Therefore an atom might be in certain
More informationWhere is quantum theory headed?
Where is quantum theory headed? Stephen L. Adler January 5, 2014 arxiv Abstract Public talk at the EmQM13 conference opening event on The Future of Quantum Mechanics The organizers have asked me to state
More informationEPR before EPR: a 1930 Einstein-Bohr thought experiment revisited
EPR before EPR: a 1930 Einstein-Bohr thought experiment revisited Hrvoje Nikolić Theoretical Physics Division, Rudjer Bošković Institute, P.O.B. 180, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia. (Dated: May 29, 2012) arxiv:1203.1139v4
More informationON THE EINSTEIN PODOLSKY ROSEN PARADOX* ]. S. BELLt Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Physics Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 195-290, 1964 Physics Publishing Co. Printed in the United States ON THE EINSTEIN PODOLSKY ROSEN PARADOX* ]. S. BELLt Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
More information