A MICROSCOPIC DERIVATION OF THE TIME-DEPENDENT HARTREE-FOCK EQUATION WITH COULOMB TWO-BODY INTERACTION
|
|
- Aron Lewis Jordan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A MICROSCOPIC DERIVATIO OF THE TIME-DEPEDET HARTREE-FOCK EQUATIO WITH COULOMB TWO-BODY ITERACTIO Jürg Fröhlich 1 Antti Knowles 2 Institute of Theoretical Physics, ETH Hönggerberg, CH-893 Zürich, Switzerland 1 Department of Mathematics, Harvard University Cambridge MA 2138, USA 1 August 1, 211 We study the dynamics of a Fermi gas with a Coulomb interaction potential, and show that, in a mean-field regime, the dynamics is described by the Hartree-Fock equation. This extends previous work of Bardos et al. [3] to the case of unbounded interaction potentials. We also express the mean-field limit as a superhamiltonian system, and state our main result in terms of the Heisenberg-picture dynamics of observables. This is a Egorov-type theorem. 1. Introduction The Hartree-Fock equation is a fundamental tool, used throughout physics and chemistry, for describing a system consisting of a large number of fermions. Despite its importance for both conceptual and numerical applications, many questions surrounding it remain unsolved. One area in which significant progress has been made is the microscopic justification of the static Hartree-Fock equation, which is known to yield the correct asymptotic ground state energy of large atoms and molecules; see [1, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14]. The time-dependent Hartree-Fock equation, which is supposed to describe the dynamics of a large Fermi system, has received less attention. To our knowledge, the only work in which this equation is derived from microscopic Hamiltonian dynamics is [3]. The Cauchy problem for the time-dependent Hartree-Fock equation has also been studied in the literature; see [2, 5] and especially [19], where the Cauchy problem is solved for singular interaction potentials. A key assumption in [3] is that the interaction potential be bounded. A goal of this article is to extend the result of [3] to a class of singular interaction potentials, which includes the physically relevant Coulomb potential. We also describe how this mean-field result can be formulated as a Egorov-type theorem. A system of spinless 1 fermions is described by a wave function Ψ x 1,..., x L 2 R 3, dx which is totally antisymmetric in its arguments. The dynamics of Ψ is governed by the usual Schrödinger 1 For simplicity of exposition we omit the spin, whose inclusion is merely a notational complication. 1
2 equation. In order to obtain a mean-field limit, the Schrödinger equation is rescaled with. In this article we adopt the scaling of [3]. The Schrödinger equation reads where the -particle Hamiltonian H is defined by i t Ψ t = H Ψ t, 1.1 H := h i + 1 wx i x j. 1.2 i<j Here, h i is a one-particle Hamiltonian acting on the coordinate x i, typically of the form h i = i + vx i, where is the three-dimensional Laplacian and v is some external potential; w is the interaction potential. Under the assumptions on v and w we make below, it is easy to see that H is a well-defined self-adjoint operator with domain H 2 R 3. We briefly sketch our main result. Consider a sequence of orthonormal orbitals ϕ 1,..., ϕ, where ϕ i is a one-particle wave function. This defines an -particle fermionic state through the Slater determinant Ψ := ϕ 1 ϕ. Let Ψ t be the solution of the Schrödinger equation 1.1 with initial state Ψ. In general, Ψ t is no longer a Slater determinant for t. However, one expects that this holds asymptotically for large : Ψ t ϕ 1 t ϕ t. Here the orbitals ϕ 1 t,..., ϕ t are supposed to solve the Hartree-Fock equation i t ϕ i = hϕ i + 1 w ϕ j 2 ϕ i 1 j=1 w ϕ i ϕ j ϕ j. 1.3 j=1 Our main result Theorems 6.1 and 6.2 below is a precise formulation of this asymptotic behaviour. Aside from the mathematical question of generalizing the result of [3] to singular potentials, this result is of some physical relevance when studying the dynamics of electrons of a large atom in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Consider an atom of atomic number commonly also denoted by Z. The nucleus has charge e, where e is the positive unit charge, and is surrounded by electrons of charge e. We assume that the nucleus is immobile; this is heuristically justified by the fact that the nucleus is much heavier than the electrons. The Hamiltonian of the electrons reads, in appropriately chosen units, i e2 + x i 1 i<j e 2 x i x j. 1.4 After conjugation with the unitary dilation defined by x i 1 x i for all i, the Hamiltonian 1.4 becomes [ ] 2 i e2 + 1 e 2, x i x i x j 1 i<j which is of the form 2 H. We conclude that our results describe the dynamics of atomic electrons at length scales of order 1 and time scales of order 2. The approximation is therefore quite crude. For 2
3 instance in the Thomas-Fermi atom, most electrons are to be found at length scales of order 1/3, while the innermost electrons K-shell, etc. reside at length scales of order 1. One problem in the above physical model, as well as in the works [1,8,9,11,13,14], is that, as becomes large, relativistic effects should be taken into account. Indeed, a simple argument shows that the speeds of the innermost electrons are of order. Another problem in applying the time-dependent Hartree-Fock theory to the dynamics of excited states is that the interaction with the radiation field is neglected. This interaction is responsible for the relaxation of excited states to the ground state of the atom. A somewhat different physical scenario is an interacting Fermi gas confined to a box of fixed size. As discussed in [6, 15], the natural scaling in this situation may be viewed as a combination of mean-field and semiclassical scalings. This problem was first studied in [15, 18]. The authors show that the limiting dynamics is governed by the Vlasov equation. These results were sharpened in [6], where the authors compare the Hamiltonian dynamics with the dynamics of the Hartree equation, and derive estimates on the rate of convergence. A further, physically very different, scenario studied in the literature is an interacting Fermi gas in the weak coupling regime. Here the limiting dynamics is given by a nonlinear Boltzmann equation. See for instance [7], in which a nonrigorous derivation is given for a model of interacting fermions on a lattice. Finally, we outline the key ideas of our proof. It relies on the diagrammatic Schwinger-Dyson expansion and Kato smoothing estimates developed in [1]. The main steps are: a Use the Schwinger-Dyson expansion to express the Hamiltonian time evolution of a p-particle observable. b Show that, in the limit, only the tree terms of the Schwinger-Dyson expansion survive. c Show that the time evolution of a p-particle observable under the Hartree-Fock equation converges to the tree terms of the Schwinger-Dyson series as. Steps a and b have been addressed in [1]. Thus, the argument in this paper consists in doing step c. This article is organized as follows. In Section 2 we introduce the Hartree-Fock equation, discuss its Hamiltonian structure and prove a Schwinger-Dyson series for its time evolution. In Section 3 we rewrite the Hartree-Fock equation using density matrices. In Sections 4 and 5 we introduce second quantized notation and Slater determinants. After these preparations, we state our main result in Section 6. The proof is given in Section 7. Finally, Section 8 is devoted to a Egorov-type formulation of our main result, whereby the microscopic dynamics is recognized as a quantization of a classical superhamiltonian theory. Conventions. In the following, the expression At holds for small times is understood to mean that there is a constant T such that At is true for all t < T. The precise value of T can always be inferred from the context. To simplify notation, we assume in the following that t. The norm of a Hilbert space H is denoted by. We denote by H n ± := P ±H n the symmetric/antisymmetric subspaces of the tensor product space H n. Here, P ± is the orthogonal projector onto the symmetric/antisymmetric subspace. The Banach space of bounded operators on H with operator norm is denoted by LH,, and the Banach space of trace-class operators on H with trace norm is denoted by L 1 H, 1. We use the notation a p i 1...i p LH n to denote a p-particle operator a p LH p acting on the coordinates x i1,..., x ip of n-particle space. Similarly, Tr i1...i p denotes a partial trace over the p-particle space corresponding to the coordinates x i1,..., x ip. 3
4 A time subscript of the form t is always understood to mean time evolution up to time t of with respect to the appropriate free dynamics. We shall explain this in greater detail whenever this notation is used. The symbol C is reserved for a constant whose dependence on some parameters may be indicated. The value of C need not be the same from one equation to the next. Acknowledgements. of this manuscript. We would like to thank two referees for pointing out inaccuracies in an earlier version 2. The Hartree-Fock equation For simplicity of notation, we only consider spinless fermions in the following; the one-particle Hilbert space is H := L 2 R 3, dx L 2 R 3. Merely cosmetic modifications extend our results to the case of spin-s fermions for which the one-particle Hilbert space is L 2 R 3 C 2s+1. To fix ideas, we consider the free Hamiltonian h := and a Coulomb two-body interaction potential wx := κ x 1. By a simple extension of the results of [1], Section 8, our results remain valid for a free Hamiltonian of the form h = + v and a two-body interaction potential w, where w is even and v, w L R 3 + L 3 wr 3 are both real. Here, L p w denotes the weak L p -space see e.g. [16]. In particular, we may treat Hamiltonians of the form i e2 x i i<j e 2 x i x j, describing the dynamics of electrons in a large atom, as discussed in Section Some notation. It is convenient to state the time-dependent Hartree-Fock equation in terms of an infinite sequence of orbitals Φ = ϕ i i which is an element of the Hilbert space H := l 2 ; L 2 R 3 = l 2 L 2 R 3. To simplify notation, we set α = x, i and write Φα = ϕ i x. Furthermore, we abbreviate dα := dx, δα α := δ ii δx x. i The scalar product on H is then given by Φ, Φ = dα ΦαΦ α. Let a p LH p and define ã p L H p through We have the identity Furthermore, one easily finds that Φ p, ã p Φ p = ã p := 1 l 2 p ap. i 1,...,i p ã p = a p. 2.1 ϕi1 ϕ ip, a p ϕ i1 ϕ ip
5 2.2. Hamiltonian formulation of the Hartree-Fock equation. The time-dependent Hartree-Fock equation for the sequence Φ reads i t ϕ i = hϕ i + w ϕ j 2 ϕ i w ϕ i ϕ j ϕ j. 2.3 j j We begin by noting that 2.3 is the Hamiltonian equation of motion of a classical Hamiltonian system with phase space Γ := l 2 H 1 R 3. Define the map A, from closed operators A p p on H + to polynomial functions on phase space, through AA p Φ := Φ p, A p Φ p = dα 1 dα p dβ 1 dβ p Φα p Φα 1 A p α 1,..., α p ; β 1,..., β p Φβ 1 Φβ p, where A p α 1,..., α p ; β 1,..., β p is the distribution kernel of A p see [1] for details. We denote by A the linear hull of functions of the form AA p, with A p p L H +. The Hamilton function is given by where H := A h A W, 2.4 W := W 1 E ; here EΨx 1, x 2 := Ψx 2, x 1 is the exchange operator and W is the two-particle operator defined by multiplication by wx 1 x 2. Written out in terms of components, 2.4 reads HΦ = i ϕ i, hϕ i ϕi ϕ j, W ϕ i ϕ j ϕ i ϕ j, W ϕ j ϕ i. i,j Using Sobolev-type inequalities, one readily sees that H is well-defined on Γ. A short calculation shows that the Hartree-Fock equation is equivalent to i t Φ = ΦHΦ. The symplectic form on Γ is given by which induces the Poisson bracket ω = i dα dφα dφα, {Φα, Φβ} = iδα β, {Φα, Φβ} = {Φα, Φβ} =. 2.5 Thus, for two observables A, B A, {A, B} Φ = i dα δa δφα Φ δb δφα Φ δb δφα Φ δa δφα Φ. The Hamiltonian equation of motion on Γ is the Hartree-Fock equation
6 The conservation laws of the Hartree-Fock flow can be understood in terms of symmetries of the Hamiltonian 2.4. One immediately sees that 2.4 is invariant under the rotation Φ U 1 L 2 R 3 Φ, where U Ll 2 is unitary. A one-parameter group of such unitary transformations is generated by linear combinations of the functions Re ϕ i, ϕ j and Im ϕ i, ϕ j, which Poisson-commute with the Hamiltonian 2.4. By oether s principle, it follows that ϕ i, ϕ j is at least formally conserved. The energy H is of course formally conserved as well. In order to solve the Hartree-Fock equation 2.3 with initial state Φ, we rewrite it as an integral equation ϕ i t = e ith ϕ i i t ds e itsh j w ϕj s 2 ϕ i s w ϕ i s ϕ j s ϕ j s. 2.6 The Cauchy-problem for 2.6 was solved in [19]. We quote the relevant results: Lemma 2.1. Let Φ H. Then 2.6 has a unique global solution Φ CR; H. Furthermore, the quantities ϕ i, ϕ j are conserved. In particular, Φt = Φ A Schwinger-Dyson expansion for the Hartree-Fock equation. Our main tool is the Schwinger-Dyson expansion for the flow of the Hartree-Fock equation. We use the notation t to denote free time evolution generated by the free Hamiltonian A h. Explicitly, A t ϕ 1, ϕ 2,... = A e ith ϕ 1, e ith ϕ 2,.... Lemma 2.2. Let A A, ν >, and Φt be the solution of 2.6 with initial data Φ H. Then, for small times t, we have that AΦt = A t Φ + = k= t 1 2 k dt k t uniformly for Φ B ν := {Φ H : Φ 2 ν}. ds 1 2{ A W, Ats } Φs { A W tk,... { A W t1, A t } } Φ, Proof. The proof of Lemma 7.1 in [1] applies with virtually no modifications. One uses 2.1, the identity and E = 1. A W t = A W t = A W t 1 E, 3. The density matrix Hartree-Fock equation From now on, we only work with orthogonal sequence of orbitals belonging to the set K := {Φ H : ϕ i, ϕ j = for i j}. By Lemma 2.1, Φ K implies that Φt K for all t. To each sequence of orbitals Φ we assign a one-particle density matrix γ Φ := ϕ i ϕ i. 3.1 i 6
7 It is easy to see that this defines a mapping from K onto the set of density matrices Furthermore, D := { γ L 1 H : γ }. γ Φ 1 = Φ 2. Conversely, one may recover Φ from γ Φ, up to ordering of the orbitals, by spectral decomposition. Also, 2.2 implies that Aã p Φ = Tra p γ p Φ. 3.2 ext, we note that the Hartree-Fock equation may be formulated in terms of density matrices. Let Φt be a solution of the Hartree-Fock equation 2.3, and abbreviate Then a short calculation shows that γt = γ Φt. i t γ = [h, γ] + Tr 2 [W, γ γ], 3.3 which is the Hartree-Fock equation for density matrices. As an integral equation in the interaction picture, this reads γt = e ith γ e ith i Sometimes it is convenient to rewrite this using the shorthand Then 3.4 is equivalent to t γt = γ i ds e itsh Tr 2 [W, γs γs] e itsh. 3.4 γt := e ith γt e ith. 3.5 t ds Tr 2 [W s, γs γs]. 3.6 The next lemma ensures that if Φt is a general solution of the integral Hartree-Fock equation 2.6 then γ Φt solves the integral density matrix equation 3.4. Lemma 3.1. Let Φt be the solution of 2.6. Then γ Φt solves 3.4. Proof. Let a 1 a LH. From Lemma 2.2 we get ow 2.5 and 3.2 imply Thus 3.7 reads Tra γ Φt = Tra t γ Φ i AãΦt = Aã t Φ + t {A W, Aã } Φ = ia [ W, ã 1 ] Φ = i Tr [ W, a 1 ] γ Φ γ Φ t = Tr a e ith γ Φ e ith i ds { A W, Aã ts } Φs. 3.7 = i Tr a 1 [ W, γ Φ γ Φ ]. ds Tr a ts 1 [ W, γ Φs γ Φs ] t Since a LH was arbitrary, this is equivalent to 3.4. ds Tr a e itsh [ ] Tr 2 W, γφs γ Φs e itsh. 7
8 4. Second quantization For the following it is convenient to use second quantized notation; see e.g. [4] and [1] for a full account. We introduce the fermionic Fock space F := H, where we adopt the usual convention that H = C. A vector Ψ F is a sequence Ψ = Ψ, Ψ 1, Ψ 2,... with Ψ H for all. By a slight abuse of notation, we often identify an -particle vector Ψ H with the vector in Fock space whose -particle component equals Ψ and whose other components vanish. On F act the usual fermionic creation and annihilation operators, a and a, which map the one-particle space into densely defined closable operators on F. For ϕ H and Ψ F, they are defined by a ϕφ x 1,..., x := 1 1 i+1 ϕx i Ψ 1 x 1,..., x ii, x i+1,..., x, aϕφ x 1,..., x := + 1 dy ϕyψ +1 y, x 1,..., x. It is not hard to see that a ϕ and aϕ are each other s adjoints. Moreover, they satisfy the canonical anticommutation relations [ aϕ, a ϕ ] = ϕ, [ + ϕ, a ϕ, a ϕ ] =, + where [A, B] + := AB + BA is the anticommutator and a stands for either a or a. Define the operator-valued distributions a x := a δ x and ax := aδ x, where δ x is Dirac s delta function centred at x. In other words, a ϕ = dx ϕx a x, aϕ = dx ϕx ax. To streamline notation, it is convenient to introduce the rescaled creation and annihilation operators, defined by a νx := 1 a x. ν Here ν > is a parameter that will ultimately be taken to equal, the number of particles. Let a p LH p and define its second quantization Âνa p, a closed operator on F, through  ν a p := dx 1 dx p dy 1 dy p a νx p a νx 1 a p x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y p a ν y 1 a ν y p, where a p x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y p denotes the distribution kernel of a p. see [1]  ν a p = H { p! ν p p P a p 1 p P if p if < p, Explicitly,  ν a p is given by which may be viewed as an alternative definition of Âνa p. In particular, when restricted to H, the operator Âa p is of order one as
9 5. Slater determinants ext, we introduce quasi-free states see [4] for more details. Their importance for our purposes stems from the fact that the Hartree-Fock equation naturally describes the time evolution of quasi-free states. Let γ D be a one-particle density matrix. The quasi-free state ω γ associated with γ satisfies by definition γ p x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y p = det γx i ; y j i,j, where γ p x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y p := ω γ a y p a y 1 ax 1 ax p is the reduced p-particle density matrix of ω γ. In other words, γ p is the operator kernel of γ p = γ p Σ p, 5.1 where Σ p p := p!p. For the following calculations it is convenient to introduce the symbol ε j1...jp i 1...i p, which is equal to sgn σ if i 1,..., i p are disjoint and there is a permutation σ S p such that i 1,..., i p = j σ1,..., j σp, and equal to otherwise. Also, for the remainder of this section, summation over any index appearing twice in an equation is implied. Lemma 5.1. Let γ D with Tr γ = 1. Then Tr γ p 1. Proof. There is an orthonormal basis ϕ i i and a sequence of nonnegative numbers λ i i such that i λ i = 1 and γ = i λ i ϕ i ϕ i. Therefore, γ p = ε j1...jp i 1...i p λ i1 λ ip ϕ i1 ϕ ip ϕ j1 ϕ jp This yields Tr γ p = ε j1...jp i 1...i p λ i1 λ ip δ i1k 1 δ ipk p δ j1k 1 δ jpk p = λ i1 λ ip i 1,...,i p disjoint i 1,...,i p λ i1 λ ip = 1. ext, we introduce a special class of quasi-free states, described by Slater determinants. Take an orthonormal sequence of orbitals Φ = ϕ i i and denote by Φ the truncated sequence ϕ 1,..., ϕ,,.... We define the -particle Slater determinant as SΦ := ϕ 1 ϕ = 1! a ϕ a ϕ 1 Ω =! P ϕ 1 ϕ H. ote that the normalization is chosen so that SΦ = 1. The corresponding -particle density matrix is Γ := SΦ SΦ. 9
10 The p-particle marginals of Γ are given by In particular, Γ p := Tr p+1... Γ = Tr p = p!!! ε i 1...i ε j1...j ϕ i1 ϕ i ϕj1 ϕ j ε j1...jp i 1...i p ϕi1 ϕ ip ϕj1 ϕ jp. 5.2 Γ 1 = 1 ϕ i ϕ i = γ, 5.3 where γ is the one-particle density matrix associated by 3.1 with the normalized truncated sequence Φ := 1 Φ. Thus, the explicit forms 5.1 and 5.2 imply a relation between the reduced density matrices and the marginals: γ p = 1 p εj1...jp i 1...i p ϕ i1 ϕ ip ϕj1 ϕ jp = p! p Γ p p. 5.4 In other words, Slater determinants determine quasi-free states by their p-particle marginals. The normalization p! p p differs slightly from the usual normalization 1 of quasi-free states, but in the limit this difference vanishes. Recalling 4.1, we see from 5.4 that SΦ, Â a p SΦ = Tr a p γ p. 5.5 We also note that γ = This is a special case of the well-known statement see e.g. [12] that Tr2... Γ 1, for any fermionic -particle density matrix Γ 2. The estimate 5.6 will play a fundamental role in our analysis. Finally, we remark that the sequence Φ t satisfies the rescaled Hartree-Fock equation 1.3 if and only if the normalized sequence Φ t satisfies the unrescaled Hartree-Fock equation 2.3. Similarly, Φ t is a solution of the integral equation 2.6 if and only if Φ t is a solution of the rescaled integral equation ϕ i t = e ith ϕ i i t ds e itsh j=1 w ϕj s 2 ϕ i s w ϕ i s ϕ j s ϕ j s The limit and main result We may now state our main result. Take an infinite sequence Φ = ϕ i i of orthonormal orbitals, and denote the truncated sequences by Φ. Let Φ t be the solution of the rescaled integral Hartree-Fock equation 5.7 with initial data Φ. 2 This can also be inferred from 5.6 by writing Γ as a linear combination of projectors. 1
11 Theorem 6.1. Let p and a p LH p. Then, for any t R, we have e ith SΦ, Âa p e ith SΦ S Φ t,  a p S Φ t as. We may also express our main result in terms of density matrices. Denote by Γ t := e ith SΦ SΦ e ith the -particle density matrix evolved in time using the -body dynamics. Similarly, denote by Γ t := S Φ t S Φ t the -particle density matrix evolved in time using the Hartree-Fock dynamics. Γ p t their respective p-particle marginals. Theorem 6.2. Let p. Then, for any t R, we have lim p p Γ t Γ t 1 =. Denote by Γ p t and Remark 6.3. The limit of Γ p t does not exist in 1. Tr Γ p p t = 1 similarly for Γ t. Indeed, lim Γ p t = but Remark 6.4. As mentioned in the beginning of Section 2, both Theorems 6.1 and 6.2 extend trivially to the case of spin-s fermions. In that case, we replace the space H from Section 2 with the space l 2 L 2 R 3 ; C 2s+1. Thus, α = x, σ, i where σ = s, s+1,..., s denotes the spin index. Vectors Φ = ϕ i H are now sequences of wave functions ϕ i ϕ i x, σ which also depend on the spin index σ. The exchange operator E acts in the natural way: EΨx 1, σ 1 ; x 2, σ 2 = Ψx 2, σ 2 ; x 1, σ 1. With these minor modifications, the statements and proofs of Theorems 6.1 and 6.2 may be taken over verbatim. Remark 6.5. As in [1], one can show that the rate of convergence in Theorems 6.1 and 6.2 is a power law βt, with βt > for all t. However, βt as t. Our bound on the rate of convergence is therefore far from the expected optimal rate βt = 1, which we only obtain for short times. 7. Proof of Theorems 6.1 and 6.2 The main tool of our proof is the graph expansion scheme developed in [1] The Schwinger-Dyson graph expansion. For the convenience of the reader we summarize the relevant results of the graph expansion in [1]. For details and proofs we refer to [1]. Let a p LH p. From now on, we restrict all operators on F to H ; in particular, we understand expressions of the form  a p to mean  a p H. We start with the Schwinger-Dyson series for the time-evolved operator e ith  a p e ith. We write [ =  h + 1 ] 2ÂW, H 11
12 and regard the second term as a perturbation. Thus we get the series expansion e ith  a p e ith = k= k t ] ] dt ik p [ 2 k W tk,... [ W t1, Âa t..., 7.1 where t = t 1,..., t k and k t is the k-simplex {t 1,..., t k : < t k < < t 1 < t}. Here, as before, a time subscript refers to free time evolution: a p t := e i i hit a p e i i hit. In [1] it was shown how the normal ordering of the multiple commutators in 7.1 gives rise to terms that can be classified graphically. The graph expansion reads e ith  a p e ith = k k= l= 1 l  k,l G t a p. 7.2 The p + k l-particle operator G k,l t a p corresponds to the sum of all l-loop graphs contributing to the multiple commutator of order k. Explicitly, it is given by G k,l t a p := k t where the operators G k,l t,t a p are recursively defined by G k,l t,t 1,...,t k a p = ip p+kl1 + ip dt G k,l t,t a p, 7.3 [ ] W i p+kl,tk, G k1,l t,t 1,...,t k1 a p 1 1 i<j p+kl P [ ] W ij,tk, G k1,l1 t,t 1,...,t k1 a p P, 7.4 as well as G, t a p := a p t. If l < or l > k then G k,l t,t 1,...,t k a p =. As a sum over graphs 3, G k,l t a p reads G k,l t a p = ik 2 k i Q dt G k,lq k Q t t,t 1,...,t k a p, 7.5 Q Qp,k,l where i Q {, 1}, k Q t [, t]k, and Qp, k, l is a set of graphs whose cardinality satisfies Qp, k, l 2 k k l 2p + 3k k p + k l l. 7.6 The operator G k,lq t,t 1,...,t k a p is an elementary term, indexed by the graph Q, of the form 3 called graph structures in [1] P W i1j 1,t v1 W irj r,t vr a p t 1 kl W ir+1j r+1,t vr+1 W ik j k,t vk P,
13 where r =,..., k and t v1,..., t vk is some permutation of t 1,..., t k. The operator norm of G k,l t a p may now be bounded using the dispersive estimate dt x 1 e it ψ 2 π ψ Going to centre of mass coordinates and using Cauchy-Schwarz, one sees that 7.8 implies t ds W ij,s ϕ πκ2 t ϕ Recalling the estimate 7.6, it is now easy to argue, as in [1], that 7.2 converges uniformly in for small times t. Moreover, the large- asymptotics of the Schwinger-Dyson series 7.2 is given by the tree terms: for small times t we have e ith  a p e ith = k=  G k, t a p + L t, 7.1 where L t, corresponding to the sum of all terms with at least one loop l 1, satisfies the estimate for small times t. L t Cp, κ, t a p 1, Convergence of the Hartree-Fock time evolution to the tree terms. We now give the main argument of our proof. We show that the Hartree-Fock time evolution is asymptotically given by the tree terms i.e. the terms l = of the Schwinger-Dyson series 7.2. This result is summarized in Lemma 7.2 below. The main idea of the proof is to iterate the integral Hartree-Fock equation so as to obtain a Schwinger- Dyson-type series. If iterated, the Hartree-Fock evolution of the observable  a p yields a power series expansion that differs from the tree expansion k=  G k, t a p. Thus, at each step of the iteration we extract an error term, and continue the iteration on what remains. This is done in such a way that the resulting power series is equal to the tree expansion. The main work is to estimate the error terms arising at each step of the iteration. This is done by using a tree expansion combined with the dispersive estimate 7.9. We work with the density matrix formulation 3.4 of the Hartree-Fock equation. We seek an expansion for the quantity SΦ t,  a p SΦ t = Tr a p γ p t ; 7.12 see 5.5. In this subsection, the special form 5.3 of γ is unimportant. We therefore assume that we have an arbitrary orthogonal sequence Φ = ϕ i i K, and denote by Φt the solution of the Hartree-Fock equation 2.6 with initial data Φ. Let γt := γ Φt be the associated one-particle density matrix. By choosing A = Aã p, a p LH p, in Lemma 2.2 and mimicking the proof of Lemma 3.1 one finds that Tr a p γt p = Tr a p t γ p i t ds p Tr a p [ ts Tr p+1 Wi p+1, γs p+1]
14 It is convenient to use the representation γt defined in 3.5. Using the substitution a p a p t in 7.13, we get Tr a p γt p = Tr a p γ p t p i ds Tr a p [ Tr p+1 Wi p+1,s, γs p+1], where, we recall, γt := e ith γt e ith. Recall that W ij = W ij 1 E ij. Also, E ij commutes with W ij and with γs p+1. Thus Σ p a p = p! a p, together with the fact that a p was arbitrary, implies the integral equation ] γt p Σ p = γ p Σ p i t ds Tr p+1 [ p W i p+1,s, γs p+1 1 E i p+1 The tree expansion would be obtained by iterating the somewhat different integral equation ] γt p Σ p = γ p Σ p i t ds Tr p+1 [ p In order to compare 7.14 with 7.15, we use the elementary identity p Σ p+1 = 1 E j p+1 Σ p. Thus we find Tr p+1 [ p W i p+1,s, γs p+1 Σ p+1 Together with 7.14 this yields γt p Σ p with an error term = γ p Σ p R p t := i i 1 i j p j=1 W i p+1,s, γs p+1 Σ p+1 ] p = Tr p+1 W i p+1,s, γs 1 p+1 t t p = Tr p+1 W i p+1,s, γs 1 p+1 ds Tr p+1 [ p W i p+1,s, γs p+1 Σ p+1 Σ p p E j p+1 j=1 p j=1 ] Σ p E j p+1 Σ p. + R p t, 7.16 ds Tr p+1 [ W i p+1,s, γs p+1 E j p+1 ] Σ p The partial trace is most conveniently computed using operator kernels. We find W i p+1,s γs p+1 E j p+1 x 1,..., x p+1 ; y 1,..., y p+1 = dz 1 dz 2 γsx r ; y r W s x i, x p+1 ; z 1, z 2 γsz 1 ; y i γsx j ; y p+1 γsz 2 ; y j, r i,j 14
15 so that Tr p+1 W i p+1,s γs p+1 E j p+1 x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y p = dz 1 dz 2 dz 3 γsx r ; y r W s x i, z 3 ; z 1, z 2 γsz 1 ; y i γsx j ; z 3 γsz 2 ; y j r i,j = γ j sw ij,s γs p x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y p The second term of the commutator in 7.17 is the adjoint of the first and we get t R p t = i ds γ j sw ij,s γs p γs p W ij,s γ j s = i 1 i j p t 1 i j p ds Σ p γ j sw ij,s γs p Σ p γs p Σ p W ij,s γ j s. We remark at this point that the formula 7.18 is the key identity behind our proof. From it our strategy is already apparent: the factor γ j s multiplies a trace class operator, so that the trace norm of the righthand side of 7.18 may eventually after the smoothing effect of the free time evolution has been exploited be estimated using the operator norm of γ j s, which is bounded by 1. Moreover, it is also apparent why it is crucial to keep the exchange term in 7.14 for our argument to work. Indeed, if the exchange term in 7.14 were dropped, the restriction i j in 7.17 would no longer hold. In that case we would have to estimate the term [ ] Tr p+1 W i p+1,s, γs p+1 E i p+1, for which the computation of 7.18 does not hold. We are now ready to iterate Multiplying 7.16 by a p LH p yields Tr a p t γt p Σ p = Tr a p t γ p Σ p t p [ ] + i ds Tr W i p+1,s, a p t 1 Iterating this K times yields our main expansion K1 Tr a p t γt p Σ p = k= + + k t K t K1 dt Tr dt Tr k= 1 i j p+k G k, t,t G K, t,t γs p+1 Σ p+1 + Tr a p γ p+k Σ p+k a p γt K p+k Σ p+k a p t R p t. R k ijt, 7.19 where the error terms are given by Rijt k := i dt Tr G k, t,t 1,...,t k a p γ j t k+1 W ij,tk+1 γt k+1 p+k Σ p+k k+1 t W ij,tk+1 γ j t k+1 G k, t,t 1,...,t k a p γt k+1 p+k Σ p+k. 15
16 ext, we estimate Rij k t. Let us concentrate on the first term, which we rewrite using the renaming t k+1 s as k t dt t ds Tr G k, t,t 1,...,t k a p γ j s W ij,s γs p+k Σ p+k, 7.2 where t := min{t 1,..., t k }. The outline of our strategy is as follows. We expand both G k, t,t 1,...,t k a p and γs p+k using a graph expansion. The integral over s allows us to control the singularity in the potential W ij,s by invoking the dispersive estimate 7.9. The term γ j s is bounded by its operator norm. We start by deriving a tree expansion for γs p. Lemma 7.1. Let a p LH p. For small times we have the tree expansion Tr a p γt p Σ p = k= k t dt Tr T k t a p γ p+k Σ p, 7.21 where T k t is the linear operator defined by T a p := a p and T k t 1...t k a p = i p+k1 Proof. Lemma 2.2 applied to A = Aã p yields Tr a p γt p = k= [ ] W i p+k,tk, T k1 t 1...t k1 a p 1. k t dt Tr T k t a p γ p+k. The claim then follows by noting that Σ p a p = p!a p and that p+k1 W i p+k,tk commutes with Σ p. The proof of convergence of the series is the same as the proof of convergence of the series 7.2 outlined in Section 7.1. We use Lemma 7.1 to expand γs p+k in 7.2. The result is that 7.2 equals k = k t dt t { ds dt Tr T k t G k, t,t a p γ j sw ij,s k s γ p+k+k Σ p+k ext, we recall from 7.5 that G k, t,t 1,...,t k a p can be written as a sum over tree graphs Q Qp, k, of elementary terms of the form 7.7. Also, since the definition of T k t 1,...,t k a p is the same as the definition of G k,,t 1,...,t k a p with W replaced by W, we immediately get that T k t 1,...,t k a p is equal to a sum over tree graphs Q Qp, k, of elementary terms of the form P W i1j 1,t v1 W irj r,t vr a p t 1 kl W ir+1j r+1,t vr+1 W ik j k,t vk P. In particular, using the dispersive estimate 7.9 and the bound 7.6, one readily sees that the tree expansion 7.21 converges for small times. }. 16
17 to Applying the tree expansion to both G k, t,t 1,...,t k a p and γs p+k in 7.2, we see that 7.2 is equal k = i k+k 2 k+k Q Qp,k, Q Qp+k,k, i Q i Q t dt k Q t { Tr A a p 1...p,t ds dt k Q s BP p+k where A, B, and C are operators with the following properties: i A, B, and C depend on the variables Q, Q, k, k, t, t ; } γ j sw ij,s C γ p+k+k Σ p+k, 7.22 ii A, B, and C are each a product of operators of the form W i j,r, or W i j,r, where r stands for a time variable in {t 1,..., t k, t 1,..., t k }; iii the product ABC contains k factors W and k factors W; iv each time variable in t 1,..., t k, t 1,..., t k appears exactly once in the product ABC. ext, we estimate the operator norm of the operator multiplying γ p+k+k in Let ϕ H p+k+k and estimate I := t i Q i Q dt ds Q Qp,k, Q Qp+k,k, k Q t k Q s t dt ds Q Qp,k, Q Qp+k,k, [,t] k dt A a p 1...p,t [,t] k dt BP p+k A a p 1...p,t γ j sw ij,s C ϕ BP p+k γ j sw ij,s C ϕ We now perform all time integrations, starting from the left, and using at each step the estimate 7.9 as well as t dr Wi j,rϕ 2πκ2 t ϕ, which follows trivially from 7.9. Also, Lemma 2.1 implies that γs = γ. Thus we find that I Q Qp,k, Q Qp+k,k, πκ 2 k+1/2 t 2πκ 2 t k /2 a p γ ϕ 2 Using the bound Qp, k, 4 p 16 k, which can be inferred from 7.6, we find πκ I 4 p 16 k 4 p+k 2 k+1/2 t 16 k 2πκ 2 t k /2 a p γ ϕ 2 16 p 2πκ 2 t 32 2πκ 2 t k 16 2πκ2 t k a p γ ϕ. 17
18 Let t < 2 11 πκ 2 1. ow Lemma 5.1 implies that γ p+k+k Σ p+k 1 1. Using the inequality TrAΓ A Γ 1 we therefore find that 7.2 is bounded by 16 p 32 2πκ2 t k 16 2πκ2 t k 32 a p γ = 16 p 2πκ2 t k πκ 2 t ap γ. k = The second term of Rij k t is equal to the complex conjugate of the first. We thus arrive at the desired bound 32 Rijt k 2 16 p 2πκ2 t k πκ 2 t ap γ Therefore the last line of 7.19 is bounded by 2 16 p πκ 2 t ap γ p + k πκ 2 t k k= 4 16 p e p πκ 2 t πκ2 t 3 ap γ, where we used the estimate k= p + kl x k ep L!. 1x L+1 ext, we note that the second line of 7.19, i.e. the rest term, vanishes in the limit K. procedure is almost identical to in fact easier than the above estimation of Rij k t. The result is K t dt Tr G K, t,t a p γt K p+k Σ p+k p 2πκ2 t K πκ 2 t ap, as K. We summarize what we have proven: For small times the Hartree-Fock time evolution is equal to the tree expansion plus an error term of order γ. Lemma 7.2. Let a p LH p. Then, for small times, we have Tr a p γt p Σ p Tr G k, t a p γ p+k Σ p+k a p γ Cp, κ, t, for some constant Cp, κ, t. k= 7.3. Conclusion of the proof. We now have all the necessary ingredients to prove our main result. Take an infinite sequence Φ = ϕ i i of orthonormal orbitals, and denote by Φ t the solution of the rescaled integral Hartree-Fock equation 5.7 with initial data Φ. Then, for small times, we find from 7.1 and 7.12 that e ith SΦ, Â a p e ith SΦ S Φ t, Â a p S Φ t = = SΦ, Â k, G t a p SΦ + SΦ, L tsφ Tr a p γ p t k= k= Tr G k, t a p γ p+k Tr a p γ p t + SΦ, L tsφ. The 18
19 Thus, Lemma 7.2 and 7.11 imply e ith SΦ, Âa p e ith SΦ S Φ t, Â a p S Φ t Cp, κ, t a p γ + 1 2Cp, κ, t a p, 7.24 by 5.6. ext, we observe that the quantum-mechanical and the Hartree-Fock time-evolutions are norm-preserving. We may therefore iterate 7.24, as in [1], to extend it to all times. Thus we find, for all times t R, e ith SΦ, Â a p e ith SΦ S Φ t, Â a p S Φ t Cp, κ, t a p γ + 1 Cp, κ, tft, a p, 7.25 where ft, is some function satisfying lim ft, = for all t R. Theorem 6.1 follows immediately. Finally, we prove Theorem 6.2. Let Γ p p t and Γ t be defined as in Section 6. Thus, plugging 5.4 and 5.5 into 7.25 yields p! Tr[ p Γ p p t Γ a p t p] Cp, κ, tft, a p. Thus, by the duality L 1 = L, we find Theorem 6.2 follows. Γ p t Γ p t 1 Cp, κ, tft,. 8. A Egorov-type result for small times In this section we describe how the many-body dynamics of fermions may be seen as the quantization of a classical superhamiltonian system, whose dynamics is approximately described by the Hartree-Fock equation A graded algebra of observables. We start by defining a Grassmann algebra of anticommuting variables over the one-particle space H = L 2 R 3, and equip it with a suitable norm. Formally, we consider the infinitedimensional Grassmann algebra generated by {ψx, ψx} x R 3. As it turns out, this algebra can be made into a Banach algebra under a natural choice of norm. This norm is most conveniently formulated by identifying elements of the Grassmann algebra with bounded operators between L 2 -spaces. Let a = a p,q p,q, a p,q LH q ; H p, 8.1 be a family of bounded operators. Such objects will play the role of observables in the following. By a slight abuse of notation we identify a p,q with the family obtained by adjoining zeroes to it. Define B G := {a = a p,q : a p,q = for all but finitely many p, q}. 19
20 We introduce a norm on B G through a B G := a p,q, 8.2 p,q and define B G as the completion of B G. We also introduce a multiplication on B G defined by ab p,q := 1 p2p1+q1 P a p1,q1 b p2,q2 P. 8.3 p 1+p 2=p q 1+q 2=q The seemingly odd choice of sign will soon become clear. It is now easy to check that B G is an associative Banach algebra with identity 1 p,q = δ p δ q. ote that B G bears a Z-grading, with degree map deg a p,q := p q. An observable is gauge invariant when its degree is equal to. One readily sees that ab = 1 deg a deg b ba. We now identify B G with a Grassmann algebra of anticommuting variables. For f H define ψf LH; C B G through ψf g := f, g 8.4 and ψf LC; H B G through ψfz := fz. 8.5 We may now consider arbitrary polynomials in the variables {ψf, ψf : f H}. It is a simple matter to check that ψf ψg + ψg ψf = ψfψg + ψg ψf = ψf ψg + ψg ψf =, for all f, g H. Furthermore, we have that ψf p ψf 1 ψg 1 ψg q = P p f 1 f p g 1 g q P q. 8.6 Linear combinations of expressions of the form 8.6 are dense in B G in the strong operator topology. It is often convenient to write a family a of bounded operators using the Grassmann generators {ψ, ψ}. To this end we set ψx := ψδ x, ψx := ψδ x, where δ x is Dirac s delta mass at x. Expressions of the form 8.6 are now understood as densely defined quadratic forms. One immediately finds a A G a := dx 1... dx p dy 1... dy q p,q ψx p ψx 1 a p,q x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y q ψy 1 ψy q. 8.7 We use the notation A G a to emphasize that the family a is represented using Grassmann generators. 2
21 8.2. A graded Poisson bracket. ext, we note that B G carries the graded Poisson bracket {a, b} := i dx [ a ] δ δ δ δ δψx δψx b + a δψx δψx b, 8.8 where a, b B G. Here we use the usual conventions for derivatives with respect to Grassmann variables see e.g. [17], Appendix B. In terms of kernels the graded Poisson bracket can be expressed as {ψx, ψy} = iδx y {ψx, ψy} = {ψx, ψy} =. 8.9 We now list the important properties of the graded Poisson bracket. i {a, b} = 1 1+deg a deg b {b, a}. ii 1 deg b deg a+deg c {a, {b, c}} + cyclic permutations =. iii {a, bc} = {a, b}c + 1 deg a deg b b{a, c}. Proof. Let us start with i: [ ] deg a+1 δa δb a+1 δa δb {a, b} = i dx 1 + 1deg δψx δψx δψx δψx [ ] deg a deg b+deg b δb δa a deg b+deg b δb δa = i dx 1 + 1deg δψx δψx δψx δψx = 1 1+deg a deg b {b, a}. In order to show ii, we note that the left-hand side can be written as a sum of three terms, the first of which contains second derivatives of a, the second second derivatives of b and the third second derivatives of c. Let us consider the third one. It is equal to the terms containing second derivatives of c of 1 deg bdeg a+deg c {a, {b, c}} + 1 deg cdeg b+deg a {b, {c, a}} = 1 deg bdeg a+deg c {a, {b, c}} + 1 deg cdeg b+deg a+1+deg c deg a {b, {a, c}}, where i was used. Define the derivation L a b := {a, b}. Thus we need to compute the terms containing second derivatives of c of 1 deg a deg b+deg b deg c L a L b c 1 deg b deg c L b L a c. Since we are only considering terms containing second derivatives of c, both derivations L a and L b must act only on c, and one finds 1 deg a deg b+deg b deg c L a L b c 1 deg a deg b+deg b deg c L a L b c =. We omit the straightforward proof of iii. Furthermore, one finds by explicit calculation {A G a p1,q1, A G b p2,q2 } = i 1 p2+1p1+q1 q 1 p 2 A G[ a p 1,q 1 1 p21 1 q11 b p2,q2] i 1 q1+1p2+q2 p 1 q 2 A G[ b p 2,q 2 1 p11 1 q21 a p1,q1]
22 8.3. States. We now introduce a space of states R B G on the algebra B G, B G. A convenient choice is R := { ρ = ρ p,q p,q : ρ p,q LH q ; H p, ρ R < }, where and ρ p,q 1 ρ R := sup ρ p,q 1 p,q := sup { Trρ p,q a q,p : a q,p LH p, H q, a q,p 1 }. ote that if p = q then 1 is the usual trace norm. The dual action is given by ρ, a := Trρ p,q a q,p. p,q We abbreviate ρ p,p ρ p in the case of gauge invariant states. ext, we note that 8.6 implies that the operator kernel of ρ p,q may be expressed as ρ p,q x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y q = ρ, ψy q ψy 1 ψx 1 ψx p There is a particular subset of gauge invariant states that is of interest for studying the Hartree-Fock dynamics. Let γ D be a one-particle density matrix. Define the state ρ γ through ρ p,q γ = if p q and where γ p is defined in 5.1. One immediately finds ρ γ 1 = γ 1. ρ p,p γ := γ p, Hamilton function and dynamics. Let h be the one-particle Hamiltonian and w the two-body interaction potential. We define a Hamilton function on a dense subset of the phase space R through H := A G h AG W = dx dy ψx hx; y ψy dx dy ψyψx ww y ψxψy The Hamiltonian equations of motion read ȧ = {H, a}, where a B G. Instead of the Heisenberg evolution of a we consider the dual Schrödinger evolution of states: ρt, a := ρ, at. The equation of motion for states reads i t ρ p,q x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y q = + p h xi p du wu x i q h yi ρ p,q x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y q q wu y i ρ p+1,q+1 x 1,..., x p, u; y 1,..., y q, u
23 This has the form of an infinite hierarchy, which decouples over subspaces of different degree. In order to show 8.14 we compute i { H, ψy q ψy 1 ψx 1 ψx p } = Then 8.14 follows from 8.11 and p h xi p + du wu x i q h yi ψy q ψy 1 ψx 1 ψx p q wu y i ψuψy q ψy 1 ψx 1 ψx p ψu. i t ρ p,q x 1,..., x p ; y 1,..., y q = i t ρ, ψyq ψy 1 ψx 1 ψx p = ρ, i { H, ψy q ψy 1 ψx 1 ψx p }. ext, we outline how to solve the equation of motion Let us first rewrite it as i t ρ p,q = p h i ρ p,q q ρ p,q h i + p Tr p+1,q+1 Wi p+1 ρ p+1,q+1 q Tr p+1,q+1 ρ p+1,q+1 W i q+1. We may now proceed exactly as with the density matrix Hartree-Fock equation 3.3, i.e. express it as an integral equation in the interaction picture. This yields a tree expansion for the quantity Tr ρ p,q t a q,p, where ρ R. We omit the uninteresting details. As above, the tree expansion converges if t < T, where T := 2 11 πκ Unfortunately, the time evolution 8.14 does not preserve the norm of ρ, which means that we cannot iterate the short-time result A Schwinger-Dyson series for the time evolution of observables. From now on, we only consider gauge invariant quantities. Take some gauge invariant state ρ = ρ p p R. For simplicity, we assume that the sequence ρ is finite as is the case if ρ is defined by a Slater determinant, see below. Let us denote the Hamiltonian flow on R by φ t. We have seen that φ t is well-defined by its tree expansion for t < T. The solution of 8.14 with initial data ρ, ρt = φ t ρ, satisfies the equation ρ p t = ρ p i t ds p [ Tr p+1 Wi p+1,s, ρ p+1 s ], 8.16 where ρ p t := e i i hit ρ p t e i i hit. Let us take a gauge invariant observable a p,p a p A G, where A G := {a B G : a p,q = if p q} is the set of gauge invariant observables. Then 8.16 implies Tr a p ρ p t = Tr a p t ρ p t = Tr a p t ρ p + i t ds p [ ] Tr W i p+1,s, a p t 1 ρ p+1 s. 23
24 Iteration of this identity gives Summarizing: Tr a p ρ p t = a p φ t, ρ = a p, ρt = Tr a p ρ p t = k= Tr G k, t a p ρ p+k. k= Tr G k, t a p ρ p+k = k= G k, t a p, ρ This series converges for t < T, uniformly for bounded a p B G and ρ R. Therefore we get the normconvergent series A G a p φ t = A G G k, t a p, 8.17 k= provided that t < T. Finally, we discuss the relationship between the Hartree-Fock dynamics and the dynamics generated by Take a density matrix γ D and consider the state ρ = ρ γ defined in If one chooses a sequence γ such that γ as e.g. a sequence of Slater determinants, then Lemma 7.2 implies that 8.14 and the Hartree-Fock equation describe the same dynamics for large Quantization and a Egorov-type theorem. In this final section we introduce a Wick quantization of the above superhamiltonian system and formulate the mean-field limit as a Egorov-type theorem. It is advantageous to use the second quantized formulation of Section 4. We define quantization, denoted by ν, as the linear map defined by the replacement ψx a ν x and ψx a νx, followed by Wick ordering. Quantization ν maps observables in B G to closed operators on F. Moreover, we have ν : A G a p Âνa p. Using 8.1, it is easy to see that, for A, B A G, [Âν, B ] ν 1 ν = {A, B} i ν + Oν 2. This identifies ν 1 as the deformation parameter of ν. Extending the definition of ν to unbounded operators in the obvious way, we define a Hamiltonian Ĥν on F as the quantization of the Hamilton function H defined in When restricted to H, Ĥ is equal to the Hamiltonian with mean-field scaling 1.2. ow 7.1, 7.11 and 8.17 yield the following Egorov-type theorem. Theorem 8.1. Let A A G and t < T, with T defined in Then e itĥ Â e itĥ A H φ t C, for some C >.. 24
25 A. Hamiltonian formulation for density matrices In Section 2 we chose a Hamiltonian formulation of the Hartree-Fock equation 2.3 in terms of sequences of orbitals. Alternatively, we could just as well have used a Hamiltonian formulation in terms of density matrices. To see how the density matrix Hartree-Fock equation 3.3 can be written as a Hamiltonian equation of motion of a classical Hamiltonian system, consider the Hilbert space Ĥ = L 2 H, the space of Hilbert-Schmidt operators, with scalar product κ, ρ := Trκ ρ. We write the density matrix γ D as γ = κκ, where κ Ĥ. The classical phase space is then given by a Sobolev-type space of Hilbert-Schmidt operators Γ := { κ Ĥ : Trκ 1 κ < }. We define polynomial functions on Γ through Ba p κ := κ p, a p κ p, where a p LH p. The affine space Γ carries a Symplectic form defined by ω = i dx dy d κx, y dκx, y, where κx, y is the operator kernel of κ. The Poisson bracket then reads { κ # x, y, κ # x, y } = {κx, y, κx, y } = iδx x δy y. The Hamilton function is defined by H := Bh BW. By using Sobolev-type inequalities one readily sees that H is well-defined on Γ. After a short computation, one finds that the Hamiltonian equation of motion, i t κx, y = δh δκx, y = i {H, κx, y}, reads i t κ = hκ + Tr 2 W κ κκ. It follows that γ = κκ satisfies
26 References [1] V. Bach, Error bound for the Hartree-Fock energy of atoms and molecules, Commun. Math. Phys , no. 3, [2] A. Bove, G. Da Prato and G. Fano, An existence proof for the Hartree-Fock time-dependent problem with bounded two-body interaction, Commun. Math. Phys , [3] C. Bardos, F. Golse, A. D. Gottlieb and J. Mauser, Mean-field dynamics of fermions and the timedependent Hartree-Fock equation, J. Math. Pures et Appl , no. 6, [4] O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson, Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 2, Springer, 22. [5] J. M. Chadam, The Time Dependent Hartree-Fock Equations with Coulomb Two-Body Interaction, Commun. Math. Phys , [6] A. Elgart, L. Erdős, B. Schlein and H.-T. Yau, onlinear Hartree equation as the mean field limit of weakly coupled fermions, J. Math. Pures et Appl , [7] L. Erdős, M. Salmhofer and H.-T. Yau, On the quantum Boltzmann equation, J. Stat. Phys , [8] C. Fefferman and L. Seco, On the energy of a large atom, Bull. Amer. Soc..S , no. 2, [9] C. Fefferman and L. Seco, On the Dirac and Schwinger corrections to the ground energy of an atom, Adv. Math , no. 1, [1] J. Fröhlich, A. Knowles and S. Schwarz, On the mean-field limit of bosons with Coulomb two-body interaction, math-ph/ v1. [11] G. M. Graf and J. P. Solovej, A correlation estimate with applications to quantum systems with Coulomb interactions, Rev. Math. Phys , no. 5a, [12] E. H. Lieb and M. Loss, Analysis, American Mathematical Society, 21. [13] E. H. Lieb and B. Simon, The Hartree-Fock theory for Coulomb systems, Commun. Math. Phys , no. 3, [14] E. H. Lieb and B. Simon, The Thomas-Fermi theory of atoms, molecules and solids, Adv. in Math , no. 1, [15] H. arnhofer and G. L. Sewell, Vlasov hydrodynamics of a quantum mechanical model, Commun. Math. Phys , [16] M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness, Academic Press, [17] M. Salmhofer, Renormalization, An Introduction, Springer, [18] H. Spohn, On the Vlasov hierarchy, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci , no. 4,
27 [19] S. Zagatti, The Cauchy problem for Hartree-Fock time-dependent equations, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré A ,
Derivation of Mean-Field Dynamics for Fermions
IST Austria Mathematical Many Body Theory and its Applications Bilbao, June 17, 2016 Derivation = show that solution of microscopic eq. is close to solution of effective eq. (with fewer degrees of freedom)
More informationwhere P a is a projector to the eigenspace of A corresponding to a. 4. Time evolution of states is governed by the Schrödinger equation
1 Content of the course Quantum Field Theory by M. Srednicki, Part 1. Combining QM and relativity We are going to keep all axioms of QM: 1. states are vectors (or rather rays) in Hilbert space.. observables
More informationAttempts at relativistic QM
Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and
More informationOn the quantum Boltzmann equation
On the quantum Boltzmann equation arxiv:math-ph/3234v1 13 Feb 23 László Erdős School of Mathematics, GeorgiaTech Manfred Salmhofer Max-Planck Institute for Mathematics, and Theoretical Physics, University
More informationFrom many body quantum dynamics to nonlinear dispersive PDE, and back
From many body quantum dynamics to nonlinear dispersive PDE, and back ataša Pavlović (based on joint works with T. Chen, and with T. Chen and. Tzirakis) University of Texas at Austin June 18, 2013 SF-CBMS
More informationTrace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem
Trace Class Operators and Lidskii s Theorem Tom Phelan Semester 2 2009 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to provide the reader with a self-contained derivation of the celebrated Lidskii Trace
More informationEIGENFUNCTIONS OF DIRAC OPERATORS AT THE THRESHOLD ENERGIES
EIGENFUNCTIONS OF DIRAC OPERATORS AT THE THRESHOLD ENERGIES TOMIO UMEDA Abstract. We show that the eigenspaces of the Dirac operator H = α (D A(x)) + mβ at the threshold energies ±m are coincide with the
More informationMean Field Limits for Interacting Bose Gases and the Cauchy Problem for Gross-Pitaevskii Hierarchies. Thomas Chen University of Texas at Austin
Mean Field Limits for Interacting Bose Gases and the Cauchy Problem for Gross-Pitaevskii Hierarchies Thomas Chen University of Texas at Austin Nataša Pavlović University of Texas at Austin Analysis and
More informationFrom the N-body problem to the cubic NLS equation
From the N-body problem to the cubic NLS equation François Golse Université Paris 7 & Laboratoire J.-L. Lions golse@math.jussieu.fr Los Alamos CNLS, January 26th, 2005 Formal derivation by N.N. Bogolyubov
More informationFinite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product
Chapter 4 Hilbert Spaces 4.1 Inner Product Spaces Inner Product Space. A complex vector space E is called an inner product space (or a pre-hilbert space, or a unitary space) if there is a mapping (, )
More informationMean-Field Limits for Large Particle Systems Lecture 2: From Schrödinger to Hartree
for Large Particle Systems Lecture 2: From Schrödinger to Hartree CMLS, École polytechnique & CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay FRUMAM, Marseilles, March 13-15th 2017 A CRASH COURSE ON QUANTUM N-PARTICLE DYNAMICS
More informationProperties of the Scattering Transform on the Real Line
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 58, 3 43 (001 doi:10.1006/jmaa.000.7375, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Properties of the Scattering Transform on the Real Line Michael
More informationNon-relativistic Quantum Electrodynamics
Rigorous Aspects of Relaxation to the Ground State Institut für Analysis, Dynamik und Modellierung October 25, 2010 Overview 1 Definition of the model Second quantization Non-relativistic QED 2 Existence
More informationThe following definition is fundamental.
1. Some Basics from Linear Algebra With these notes, I will try and clarify certain topics that I only quickly mention in class. First and foremost, I will assume that you are familiar with many basic
More informationQuantum Computing Lecture 2. Review of Linear Algebra
Quantum Computing Lecture 2 Review of Linear Algebra Maris Ozols Linear algebra States of a quantum system form a vector space and their transformations are described by linear operators Vector spaces
More informationAccuracy of the time-dependent Hartree-Fock approximation
Accuracy of the time-dependent Hartree-Fock approximation Claude BARDOS, François GOLSE, Alex D. GOTTLIEB and Norbert J. MAUSER Abstract This article examines the time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) approximation
More informationDensity Matrices. Chapter Introduction
Chapter 15 Density Matrices 15.1 Introduction Density matrices are employed in quantum mechanics to give a partial description of a quantum system, one from which certain details have been omitted. For
More informationMP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS
MP463 QUANTUM MECHANICS Introduction Quantum theory of angular momentum Quantum theory of a particle in a central potential - Hydrogen atom - Three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator (a model of
More informationVector Spaces. Vector space, ν, over the field of complex numbers, C, is a set of elements a, b,..., satisfying the following axioms.
Vector Spaces Vector space, ν, over the field of complex numbers, C, is a set of elements a, b,..., satisfying the following axioms. For each two vectors a, b ν there exists a summation procedure: a +
More informationEffective dynamics of many-body quantum systems
Effective dynamics of many-body quantum systems László Erdős University of Munich Grenoble, May 30, 2006 A l occassion de soixantiéme anniversaire de Yves Colin de Verdiére Joint with B. Schlein and H.-T.
More information1 Continuity Classes C m (Ω)
0.1 Norms 0.1 Norms A norm on a linear space X is a function : X R with the properties: Positive Definite: x 0 x X (nonnegative) x = 0 x = 0 (strictly positive) λx = λ x x X, λ C(homogeneous) x + y x +
More information1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator
1 The Quantum Anharmonic Oscillator Perturbation theory based on Feynman diagrams can be used to calculate observables in Quantum Electrodynamics, like the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, and
More informationGround-State Energies of Coulomb Systems and Reduced One-Particle Density Matrices
Ground-State Energies of Coulomb Systems and Reduced One-Particle Density Matrices Heinz Siedentop Chennai, August 16, 2010 I. Introduction Atomic Schrödinger operator H N,Z := N n=1 self-adjointly realized
More informationStability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games
Stability of Feedback Solutions for Infinite Horizon Noncooperative Differential Games Alberto Bressan ) and Khai T. Nguyen ) *) Department of Mathematics, Penn State University **) Department of Mathematics,
More information3 Symmetry Protected Topological Phase
Physics 3b Lecture 16 Caltech, 05/30/18 3 Symmetry Protected Topological Phase 3.1 Breakdown of noninteracting SPT phases with interaction Building on our previous discussion of the Majorana chain and
More informationAutomorphic Equivalence Within Gapped Phases
1 Harvard University May 18, 2011 Automorphic Equivalence Within Gapped Phases Robert Sims University of Arizona based on joint work with Sven Bachmann, Spyridon Michalakis, and Bruno Nachtergaele 2 Outline:
More informationConsistent Histories. Chapter Chain Operators and Weights
Chapter 10 Consistent Histories 10.1 Chain Operators and Weights The previous chapter showed how the Born rule can be used to assign probabilities to a sample space of histories based upon an initial state
More informationWave function methods for the electronic Schrödinger equation
Wave function methods for the electronic Schrödinger equation Zürich 2008 DFG Reseach Center Matheon: Mathematics in Key Technologies A7: Numerical Discretization Methods in Quantum Chemistry DFG Priority
More information08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces. 1. Boundedness, continuity, operator norms
(February 24, 2017) 08a. Operators on Hilbert spaces Paul Garrett garrett@math.umn.edu http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/ [This document is http://www.math.umn.edu/ garrett/m/real/notes 2016-17/08a-ops
More informationMath 350 Fall 2011 Notes about inner product spaces. In this notes we state and prove some important properties of inner product spaces.
Math 350 Fall 2011 Notes about inner product spaces In this notes we state and prove some important properties of inner product spaces. First, recall the dot product on R n : if x, y R n, say x = (x 1,...,
More informationIntroduction to Electronic Structure Theory
Introduction to Electronic Structure Theory C. David Sherrill School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology June 2002 Last Revised: June 2003 1 Introduction The purpose of these
More informationSecond Quantization: Quantum Fields
Second Quantization: Quantum Fields Bosons and Fermions Let X j stand for the coordinate and spin subscript (if any) of the j-th particle, so that the vector of state Ψ of N particles has the form Ψ Ψ(X
More informationSystems of Identical Particles
qmc161.tex Systems of Identical Particles Robert B. Griffiths Version of 21 March 2011 Contents 1 States 1 1.1 Introduction.............................................. 1 1.2 Orbitals................................................
More informationMathematical Methods wk 2: Linear Operators
John Magorrian, magog@thphysoxacuk These are work-in-progress notes for the second-year course on mathematical methods The most up-to-date version is available from http://www-thphysphysicsoxacuk/people/johnmagorrian/mm
More informationResolvent Algebras. An alternative approach to canonical quantum systems. Detlev Buchholz
Resolvent Algebras An alternative approach to canonical quantum systems Detlev Buchholz Analytical Aspects of Mathematical Physics ETH Zürich May 29, 2013 1 / 19 2 / 19 Motivation Kinematics of quantum
More informationON THE CHERN CHARACTER OF A THETA-SUMMABLE FREDHOLM MODULE.
ON THE CHERN CHARACTER OF A THETA-SUMMABLE FREDHOLM MODULE. Ezra Getzler and András Szenes Department of Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 02138 USA In [3], Connes defines the notion of
More informationLecture 10. The Dirac equation. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 10 The Dirac equation WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics The Dirac equation The Dirac equation is a relativistic quantum mechanical wave equation formulated by British physicist
More information5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis:
5 Representations 5.3 Given a three-dimensional Hilbert space, consider the two observables ξ and η that, with respect to the basis 1, 2, 3, arerepresentedby the matrices: ξ ξ 1 0 0 0 ξ 1 0 0 0 ξ 3, ξ
More informationDERIVATION OF THE CUBIC NLS AND GROSS-PITAEVSKII HIERARCHY FROM MANYBODY DYNAMICS IN d = 2, 3 BASED ON SPACETIME NORMS
DERIVATIO OF THE CUBIC LS AD GROSS-PITAEVSKII HIERARCHY FROM MAYBODY DYAMICS I d = 2, 3 BASED O SPACETIME ORMS THOMAS CHE AD ATAŠA PAVLOVIĆ Abstract. We derive the defocusing cubic Gross-Pitaevskii (GP)
More informationRadial balanced metrics on the unit disk
Radial balanced metrics on the unit disk Antonio Greco and Andrea Loi Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica Università di Cagliari Via Ospedale 7, 0914 Cagliari Italy e-mail : greco@unica.it, loi@unica.it
More information1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 and W2016
1 Math 241A-B Homework Problem List for F2015 W2016 1.1 Homework 1. Due Wednesday, October 7, 2015 Notation 1.1 Let U be any set, g be a positive function on U, Y be a normed space. For any f : U Y let
More informationLecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 5 Hartree-Fock Theory WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Particle-number representation: General formalism The simplest starting point for a many-body state is a system of
More information1 The postulates of quantum mechanics
1 The postulates of quantum mechanics The postulates of quantum mechanics were derived after a long process of trial and error. These postulates provide a connection between the physical world and the
More informationDerivation of the time dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the dynamics of the Bose-Einstein condensate
Derivation of the time dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the dynamics of the Bose-Einstein condensate László Erdős University of Munich Evian-les-Bains, 2007 June Joint work with B. Schlein and H.T.
More informationON MATRIX VALUED SQUARE INTEGRABLE POSITIVE DEFINITE FUNCTIONS
1 2 3 ON MATRIX VALUED SQUARE INTERABLE POSITIVE DEFINITE FUNCTIONS HONYU HE Abstract. In this paper, we study matrix valued positive definite functions on a unimodular group. We generalize two important
More informationSecond quantization. Emmanuel Fromager
Institut de Chimie, Strasbourg, France Page 1 Emmanuel Fromager Institut de Chimie de Strasbourg - Laboratoire de Chimie Quantique - Université de Strasbourg /CNRS M2 lecture, Strasbourg, France. Institut
More information1 Mathematical preliminaries
1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical
More informationRepresentations of Sp(6,R) and SU(3) carried by homogeneous polynomials
Representations of Sp(6,R) and SU(3) carried by homogeneous polynomials Govindan Rangarajan a) Department of Mathematics and Centre for Theoretical Studies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012,
More information7.1 Creation and annihilation operators
Chapter 7 Second Quantization Creation and annihilation operators. Occupation number. Anticommutation relations. Normal product. Wick s theorem. One-body operator in second quantization. Hartree- Fock
More informationVector and Tensor Calculus
Appendices 58 A Vector and Tensor Calculus In relativistic theory one often encounters vector and tensor expressions in both three- and four-dimensional form. The most important of these expressions are
More informationDeterminant lines and determinant line bundles
CHAPTER Determinant lines and determinant line bundles This appendix is an exposition of G. Segal s work sketched in [?] on determinant line bundles over the moduli spaces of Riemann surfaces with parametrized
More informationWe denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.
Sep. 1 0, 008 Distributions Distributions are generalized functions. Some familiarity with the theory of distributions helps understanding of various function spaces which play important roles in the study
More informationPreliminaries: what you need to know
January 7, 2014 Preliminaries: what you need to know Asaf Pe er 1 Quantum field theory (QFT) is the theoretical framework that forms the basis for the modern description of sub-atomic particles and their
More informationIntroduction to Quantum Spin Systems
1 Introduction to Quantum Spin Systems Lecture 2 Sven Bachmann (standing in for Bruno Nachtergaele) Mathematics, UC Davis MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/10/11 2 Basic Setup For concreteness, consider
More informationL. Levaggi A. Tabacco WAVELETS ON THE INTERVAL AND RELATED TOPICS
Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Pol. Torino Vol. 57, 1999) L. Levaggi A. Tabacco WAVELETS ON THE INTERVAL AND RELATED TOPICS Abstract. We use an abstract framework to obtain a multilevel decomposition of a variety
More information4 Matrix product states
Physics 3b Lecture 5 Caltech, 05//7 4 Matrix product states Matrix product state (MPS) is a highly useful tool in the study of interacting quantum systems in one dimension, both analytically and numerically.
More informationHilbert Spaces. Hilbert space is a vector space with some extra structure. We start with formal (axiomatic) definition of a vector space.
Hilbert Spaces Hilbert space is a vector space with some extra structure. We start with formal (axiomatic) definition of a vector space. Vector Space. Vector space, ν, over the field of complex numbers,
More informationBosonic quadratic Hamiltonians. diagonalization
and their diagonalization P. T. Nam 1 M. Napiórkowski 2 J. P. Solovej 3 1 Masaryk University Brno 2 University of Warsaw 3 University of Copenhagen Macroscopic Limits of Quantum Systems 70th Birthday of
More informationIntroduction to the Mathematics of the XY -Spin Chain
Introduction to the Mathematics of the XY -Spin Chain Günter Stolz June 9, 2014 Abstract In the following we present an introduction to the mathematical theory of the XY spin chain. The importance of this
More informationAnalysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version
Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version Frank Pacard To cite this version: Frank Pacard. Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version. 3rd cycle. Téhéran (Iran, 2006, pp.75.
More informationThe oblique derivative problem for general elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains
M. MITREA The oblique derivative problem for general elliptic systems in Lipschitz domains Let M be a smooth, oriented, connected, compact, boundaryless manifold of real dimension m, and let T M and T
More informationBoolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices
Boolean Inner-Product Spaces and Boolean Matrices Stan Gudder Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver CO 80208 Frédéric Latrémolière Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver
More information1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime
1 Quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime The theory of quantum fields in curved spacetime is a generalization of the well-established theory of quantum fields in Minkowski spacetime. To a great extent,
More informationLecture notes for Mathematics 208 William Arveson. 24 November 1998
THE CANONICAL ANTICOMMUTATION RELATIONS Lecture notes for Mathematics 208 William Arveson 24 November 1998 In these notes we discuss the canonical anticommutation relations, the C - algebra associated
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationThe Dirac Field. Physics , Quantum Field Theory. October Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz
Michael Dine Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz October 2013 Lorentz Transformation Properties of the Dirac Field First, rotations. In ordinary quantum mechanics, ψ σ i ψ (1) is
More informationElementary linear algebra
Chapter 1 Elementary linear algebra 1.1 Vector spaces Vector spaces owe their importance to the fact that so many models arising in the solutions of specific problems turn out to be vector spaces. The
More informationClarkson Inequalities With Several Operators
isid/ms/2003/23 August 14, 2003 http://www.isid.ac.in/ statmath/eprints Clarkson Inequalities With Several Operators Rajendra Bhatia Fuad Kittaneh Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi Centre 7, SJSS Marg,
More informationSELF-ADJOINTNESS OF DIRAC OPERATORS VIA HARDY-DIRAC INEQUALITIES
SELF-ADJOINTNESS OF DIRAC OPERATORS VIA HARDY-DIRAC INEQUALITIES MARIA J. ESTEBAN 1 AND MICHAEL LOSS Abstract. Distinguished selfadjoint extension of Dirac operators are constructed for a class of potentials
More informationA Brief Introduction to Linear Response Theory with Examples in Electromagnetic Response
A Brief Introduction to Linear Response Theory with Examples in Electromagnetic Response Robert Van Wesep May 3, 2013 In order to gain information about any physical system, it is necessary to probe the
More informationPutzer s Algorithm. Norman Lebovitz. September 8, 2016
Putzer s Algorithm Norman Lebovitz September 8, 2016 1 Putzer s algorithm The differential equation dx = Ax, (1) dt where A is an n n matrix of constants, possesses the fundamental matrix solution exp(at),
More informationChapter 8 Integral Operators
Chapter 8 Integral Operators In our development of metrics, norms, inner products, and operator theory in Chapters 1 7 we only tangentially considered topics that involved the use of Lebesgue measure,
More informationThe Spinor Representation
The Spinor Representation Math G4344, Spring 2012 As we have seen, the groups Spin(n) have a representation on R n given by identifying v R n as an element of the Clifford algebra C(n) and having g Spin(n)
More informationRepresentation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom
Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Justin Campbell August 3, 2017 1 Representations of SU 2 and SO 3 (R) 1.1 The following observation is long overdue. Proposition
More informationSpectral action, scale anomaly. and the Higgs-Dilaton potential
Spectral action, scale anomaly and the Higgs-Dilaton potential Fedele Lizzi Università di Napoli Federico II Work in collaboration with A.A. Andrianov (St. Petersburg) and M.A. Kurkov (Napoli) JHEP 1005:057,2010
More informationΨ ν ), if ν is ω-normal, Ψω Ψ ν
Entropy production VOJKAN JAŠIĆ 1, CLAUDE-ALAIN PILLET 2 1 Department of Mathematics and Statistics McGill University 85 Sherbrooke Street West Montreal, QC, H3A 2K6, Canada jaksic@math.mcgill.ca 2 CPT-CNRS,
More informationDS-GA 1002 Lecture notes 0 Fall Linear Algebra. These notes provide a review of basic concepts in linear algebra.
DS-GA 1002 Lecture notes 0 Fall 2016 Linear Algebra These notes provide a review of basic concepts in linear algebra. 1 Vector spaces You are no doubt familiar with vectors in R 2 or R 3, i.e. [ ] 1.1
More informationΑΒΓΔΕΖΗΘΙΚΛΜΝΞΟΠΡΣΤΥΦΧΨΩ αβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψω +<=>± ħ
CHAPTER 1. SECOND QUANTIZATION In Chapter 1, F&W explain the basic theory: Review of Section 1: H = ij c i < i T j > c j + ij kl c i c j < ij V kl > c l c k for fermions / for bosons [ c i, c j ] = [ c
More informationKernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels
Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels 2. Positive Definite Kernel and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space Kenji Fukumizu The Institute of Statistical Mathematics. Graduate University
More informationb i (µ, x, s) ei ϕ(x) µ s (dx) ds (2) i=1
NONLINEAR EVOLTION EQATIONS FOR MEASRES ON INFINITE DIMENSIONAL SPACES V.I. Bogachev 1, G. Da Prato 2, M. Röckner 3, S.V. Shaposhnikov 1 The goal of this work is to prove the existence of a solution to
More informationLECTURE 1: SOURCES OF ERRORS MATHEMATICAL TOOLS A PRIORI ERROR ESTIMATES. Sergey Korotov,
LECTURE 1: SOURCES OF ERRORS MATHEMATICAL TOOLS A PRIORI ERROR ESTIMATES Sergey Korotov, Institute of Mathematics Helsinki University of Technology, Finland Academy of Finland 1 Main Problem in Mathematical
More informationSpectral Continuity Properties of Graph Laplacians
Spectral Continuity Properties of Graph Laplacians David Jekel May 24, 2017 Overview Spectral invariants of the graph Laplacian depend continuously on the graph. We consider triples (G, x, T ), where G
More informationTHE ESSENTIAL SELF-ADJOINTNESS OF SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS WITH OSCILLATING POTENTIALS. Adam D. Ward. In Memory of Boris Pavlov ( )
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Volume 46 (016), 65-7 THE ESSENTIAL SELF-ADJOINTNESS OF SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS WITH OSCILLATING POTENTIALS Adam D. Ward (Received 4 May, 016) In Memory of Boris Pavlov
More informationA CLASS OF SCHUR MULTIPLIERS ON SOME QUASI-BANACH SPACES OF INFINITE MATRICES
A CLASS OF SCHUR MULTIPLIERS ON SOME QUASI-BANACH SPACES OF INFINITE MATRICES NICOLAE POPA Abstract In this paper we characterize the Schur multipliers of scalar type (see definition below) acting on scattered
More informationDerivatives of Harmonic Bergman and Bloch Functions on the Ball
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 26, 1 123 (21) doi:1.16/jmaa.2.7438, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Derivatives of Harmonic ergman and loch Functions on the all oo
More informationIr O D = D = ( ) Section 2.6 Example 1. (Bottom of page 119) dim(v ) = dim(l(v, W )) = dim(v ) dim(f ) = dim(v )
Section 3.2 Theorem 3.6. Let A be an m n matrix of rank r. Then r m, r n, and, by means of a finite number of elementary row and column operations, A can be transformed into the matrix ( ) Ir O D = 1 O
More informationThe Dirichlet s P rinciple. In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation:
Oct. 1 The Dirichlet s P rinciple In this lecture we discuss an alternative formulation of the Dirichlet problem for the Laplace equation: 1. Dirichlet s Principle. u = in, u = g on. ( 1 ) If we multiply
More informationRENORMALIZATION OF DYSON S VECTOR-VALUED HIERARCHICAL MODEL AT LOW TEMPERATURES
RENORMALIZATION OF DYSON S VECTOR-VALUED HIERARCHICAL MODEL AT LOW TEMPERATURES P. M. Bleher (1) and P. Major (2) (1) Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics of the Soviet Academy of Sciences Moscow (2)
More informationEigenvalues, random walks and Ramanujan graphs
Eigenvalues, random walks and Ramanujan graphs David Ellis 1 The Expander Mixing lemma We have seen that a bounded-degree graph is a good edge-expander if and only if if has large spectral gap If G = (V,
More informationMean-Field Theory: HF and BCS
Mean-Field Theory: HF and BCS Erik Koch Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich N (x) = p N! ' (x ) ' 2 (x ) ' N (x ) ' (x 2 ) ' 2 (x 2 ) ' N (x 2 )........ ' (x N ) ' 2 (x N ) ' N (x N ) Slater determinant
More informationOn Riesz-Fischer sequences and lower frame bounds
On Riesz-Fischer sequences and lower frame bounds P. Casazza, O. Christensen, S. Li, A. Lindner Abstract We investigate the consequences of the lower frame condition and the lower Riesz basis condition
More informationP AC COMMUTATORS AND THE R TRANSFORM
Communications on Stochastic Analysis Vol. 3, No. 1 (2009) 15-31 Serials Publications www.serialspublications.com P AC COMMUTATORS AND THE R TRANSFORM AUREL I. STAN Abstract. We develop an algorithmic
More informationTitle: Localized self-adjointness of Schrödinger-type operators on Riemannian manifolds. Proposed running head: Schrödinger-type operators on
Title: Localized self-adjointness of Schrödinger-type operators on Riemannian manifolds. Proposed running head: Schrödinger-type operators on manifolds. Author: Ognjen Milatovic Department Address: Department
More informationA brief introduction to trace class operators
A brief introduction to trace class operators Christopher Hawthorne December 2015 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Preliminaries 1 3 Trace class operators 2 4 Duals 8 1 Introduction The trace is a useful number
More informationLecture Models for heavy-ion collisions (Part III): transport models. SS2016: Dynamical models for relativistic heavy-ion collisions
Lecture Models for heavy-ion collisions (Part III: transport models SS06: Dynamical models for relativistic heavy-ion collisions Quantum mechanical description of the many-body system Dynamics of heavy-ion
More informationEffective Constraints
Introduction work with M. Bojowald, B. Sandhöfer and A. Skirzewski IGC, Penn State 1 arxiv:0804.3365, submitted to Rev. Math. Phys. Introduction Constrained systems Classically constraints restrict physically
More informationThe query register and working memory together form the accessible memory, denoted H A. Thus the state of the algorithm is described by a vector
1 Query model In the quantum query model we wish to compute some function f and we access the input through queries. The complexity of f is the number of queries needed to compute f on a worst-case input
More informationPart I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory
Part I. Many-Body Systems and Classical Field Theory 1. Classical and Quantum Mechanics of Particle Systems 3 1.1 Introduction. 3 1.2 Classical Mechanics of Mass Points 4 1.3 Quantum Mechanics: The Harmonic
More informationChapter One. The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity
Chapter One The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity Our story begins with a classical situation: convolution with homogeneous, Calderón- Zygmund ( kernels on R n. Let S n 1 R n denote the unit sphere
More informationThis operator has a kernel that can calculated. In one dimension it is given by. ( 2 + E) 1 (x, y) = 1 2. E e. 1 e E x y
The Birman-Schwinger Prinicple All the proofs of the general inequalities involve in one way or another the Birman- Schwinger principle. To state, we shall from now consider only negative potentials of
More information