Nonassociative Geometry and Non-Geometric Backgrounds
|
|
- Arleen Johnston
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Nonassociative Geometry and Non-Geometric Backgrounds Richard Szabo Action MP 1405 Quantum Structure of Spacetime Division of Theoretical Physics Seminar Rudjer Bos kovic Institute, Zagreb April 18, 2018
2 D-branes and the Lie algebra su(2)
3 D-branes and the Lie algebra su(2) D1 D3
4 D-branes and the Lie algebra su(2) D1 D3 (BPS) monopoles D1-branes ending on D3-branes
5 D-branes and the Lie algebra su(2) D1 D3 (BPS) monopoles D1-branes ending on D3-branes From perspective of D1-branes described by Nahm equations: (Nahm 80; Diaconescu 97; Tsimpis 98) dt i ds + εijk [T j, T k ] = 0 (s = x 6 )
6 D-branes and the Lie algebra su(2) D1 D3 (BPS) monopoles D1-branes ending on D3-branes From perspective of D1-branes described by Nahm equations: (Nahm 80; Diaconescu 97; Tsimpis 98) dt i ds + εijk [T j, T k ] = 0 (s = x 6 ) Solution: T i (s) = 1 s X i, [X i, X j ] = ε ijk X k fuzzy S 2 (Myers 99)
7 M-branes and the 3-Lie algebra A4
8 M-branes and the 3-Lie algebra A M2 M5
9 M-branes and the 3-Lie algebra A M2 M5 Lift monopoles to M-theory self-dual strings
10 M-branes and the 3-Lie algebra A M2 M5 Lift monopoles to M-theory self-dual strings M2-branes ending on M5-branes described by Basu Harvey equations: (Basu & Harvey 05) dt i ds + εijkl [T j, T k, T l ] = 0 (s = x 6 )
11 M-branes and the 3-Lie algebra A M2 M5 Lift monopoles to M-theory self-dual strings M2-branes ending on M5-branes described by Basu Harvey equations: (Basu & Harvey 05) dt i ds + εijkl [T j, T k, T l ] = 0 (s = x 6 ) Solution: T i (s) = 1 2s X i, [X i, X j, X k ] = ε ijkl X l fuzzy S 3?
12 Open strings and B-fields
13 Open strings and B-fields Nahm equations boundary condition for open strings (Chu & Smith 09)
14 Open strings and B-fields Nahm equations boundary condition for open strings (Chu & Smith 09) Turning on constant 2-form B-field on D3-brane induces shift in Nahm equations, accounted for by Heisenberg algebra: [X i, X j ] = i θ ij, θ B
15 Open strings and B-fields Nahm equations boundary condition for open strings (Chu & Smith 09) Turning on constant 2-form B-field on D3-brane induces shift in Nahm equations, accounted for by Heisenberg algebra: [X i, X j ] = i θ ij, θ B Quantization of Poisson bracket on R 2 (Chu & Ho 98; Schomerus 99; Seiberg & Witten 99;... )
16 Open strings and B-fields Nahm equations boundary condition for open strings (Chu & Smith 09) Turning on constant 2-form B-field on D3-brane induces shift in Nahm equations, accounted for by Heisenberg algebra: [X i, X j ] = i θ ij, θ B Quantization of Poisson bracket on R 2 (Chu & Ho 98; Schomerus 99; Seiberg & Witten 99;... ) Quantization captured by associative Moyal Weyl star-product of fields encoded in scattering amplitudes: (f g)(x) = f (k) g(k ) e i 2 k θk e i (k+k ) x k,k
17 Open strings and B-fields Nahm equations boundary condition for open strings (Chu & Smith 09) Turning on constant 2-form B-field on D3-brane induces shift in Nahm equations, accounted for by Heisenberg algebra: [X i, X j ] = i θ ij, θ B Quantization of Poisson bracket on R 2 (Chu & Ho 98; Schomerus 99; Seiberg & Witten 99;... ) Quantization captured by associative Moyal Weyl star-product of fields encoded in scattering amplitudes: (f g)(x) = f (k) g(k ) e i 2 k θk e i (k+k ) x k,k Low-energy dynamics described by noncommutative gauge theory on D3-brane
18 Open membranes and C-fields
19 Open membranes and C-fields Basu Harvey equations boundary condition of open membranes
20 Open membranes and C-fields Basu Harvey equations boundary condition of open membranes Modification from constant 3-form C-field on M5-brane accounted for by Nambu Heisenberg algebra: (Nambu 73) [X i, X j, X k ] = i Θ ijk, Θ C Quantization of Nambu Poisson 3-bracket on R 3
21 Open membranes and C-fields Basu Harvey equations boundary condition of open membranes Modification from constant 3-form C-field on M5-brane accounted for by Nambu Heisenberg algebra: (Nambu 73) [X i, X j, X k ] = i Θ ijk, Θ C Quantization of Nambu Poisson 3-bracket on R 3 Agrees via transgression with noncommutative loop space from quantization of open membranes: (Bergshoeff, Berman, van der Schaar & Sundell 00; Kawamoto & Sasakura 00; Sämann & RS 12) [ X i (τ), X j (τ ) ] = i Θ ijk Ẋ k (τ) Ẋ (τ) 2 δ(τ τ ) +
22 Open membranes and C-fields Basu Harvey equations boundary condition of open membranes Modification from constant 3-form C-field on M5-brane accounted for by Nambu Heisenberg algebra: (Nambu 73) [X i, X j, X k ] = i Θ ijk, Θ C Quantization of Nambu Poisson 3-bracket on R 3 Agrees via transgression with noncommutative loop space from quantization of open membranes: (Bergshoeff, Berman, van der Schaar & Sundell 00; Kawamoto & Sasakura 00; Sämann & RS 12) [ X i (τ), X j (τ ) ] = i Θ ijk Ẋ k (τ) Ẋ (τ) 2 δ(τ τ ) + Quantization unknown
23 Non-geometric fluxes
24 Non-geometric fluxes Quantum geometry of closed strings: Closed strings winding and propagating in non-geometric flux compactifications probe noncommutative/nonassociative deformations of geometry (Blumenhagen & Plauschinn 10; Lüst 10; Blumenhagen, Deser, Lüst, Plauschinn & Rennecke 11; Condeescu, Florakis & Lüst 12; Mylonas, Schupp & RS 12; Andriot, Larfors, Lüst & Patalong 12; Davidović, Nikolić & Sazdović 13; Blair 14; Bakas & Lüst 15; Nikolić & Obrić 18; Chatzistavrakidis, Jonke, Khoo & RS 18;... )
25 Non-geometric fluxes Quantum geometry of closed strings: Closed strings winding and propagating in non-geometric flux compactifications probe noncommutative/nonassociative deformations of geometry (Blumenhagen & Plauschinn 10; Lüst 10; Blumenhagen, Deser, Lüst, Plauschinn & Rennecke 11; Condeescu, Florakis & Lüst 12; Mylonas, Schupp & RS 12; Andriot, Larfors, Lüst & Patalong 12; Davidović, Nikolić & Sazdović 13; Blair 14; Bakas & Lüst 15; Nikolić & Obrić 18; Chatzistavrakidis, Jonke, Khoo & RS 18;... ) M = T 3 with H-flux gives geometric and non-geometric fluxes via T-duality (Hull 05; Shelton, Taylor & Wecht 05) H ijk T i f i jk T j Q ij k T k R ijk
26 Non-geometric fluxes Quantum geometry of closed strings: Closed strings winding and propagating in non-geometric flux compactifications probe noncommutative/nonassociative deformations of geometry (Blumenhagen & Plauschinn 10; Lüst 10; Blumenhagen, Deser, Lüst, Plauschinn & Rennecke 11; Condeescu, Florakis & Lüst 12; Mylonas, Schupp & RS 12; Andriot, Larfors, Lüst & Patalong 12; Davidović, Nikolić & Sazdović 13; Blair 14; Bakas & Lüst 15; Nikolić & Obrić 18; Chatzistavrakidis, Jonke, Khoo & RS 18;... ) M = T 3 with H-flux gives geometric and non-geometric fluxes via T-duality (Hull 05; Shelton, Taylor & Wecht 05) H ijk T i f i jk T j Q ij k T k R ijk Sends string winding (w i ) H 1 (T 3, Z) = Z 3 to momenta (p i )
27 Non-geometric fluxes Quantum geometry of closed strings: Closed strings winding and propagating in non-geometric flux compactifications probe noncommutative/nonassociative deformations of geometry (Blumenhagen & Plauschinn 10; Lüst 10; Blumenhagen, Deser, Lüst, Plauschinn & Rennecke 11; Condeescu, Florakis & Lüst 12; Mylonas, Schupp & RS 12; Andriot, Larfors, Lüst & Patalong 12; Davidović, Nikolić & Sazdović 13; Blair 14; Bakas & Lüst 15; Nikolić & Obrić 18; Chatzistavrakidis, Jonke, Khoo & RS 18;... ) M = T 3 with H-flux gives geometric and non-geometric fluxes via T-duality (Hull 05; Shelton, Taylor & Wecht 05) H ijk T i f i jk T j Q ij k T k R ijk Sends string winding (w i ) H 1 (T 3, Z) = Z 3 to momenta (p i ) T ijk In Double Field Theory: H ijk = [i B jk] R ijk = ˆ [i β jk] (Andriot, Hohm, Larfors, Lüst & Patalong 12)
28 Parabolic R-flux model
29 Parabolic R-flux model Twisted Poisson structure on phase space M = T M (Lüst 10) [x i, x j ] = i l3 s 3 Rijk p k, [x i, p j ] = i δ i j, [p i, p j ] = 0 Closed string nonassociativity (Jacobiator) [x i, x j, x k ] = l 3 s R ijk
30 Parabolic R-flux model Twisted Poisson structure on phase space M = T M (Lüst 10) [x i, x j ] = i l3 s 3 Rijk p k, [x i, p j ] = i δ i j, [p i, p j ] = 0 Closed string nonassociativity (Jacobiator) [x i, x j, x k ] = l 3 s R ijk Quantization captured by nonassociative phase space star product (Mylonas, Schupp & RS 12; Bakas & Lüst 13; Kupriyanov & Vassilevich 15) (f g)(x) = k,k f (k) g(k ) e i 2 (k p k x kx k p ) e i l3 s 6 R (kx k x ) p e i (k+k ) x
31 Parabolic R-flux model Twisted Poisson structure on phase space M = T M (Lüst 10) [x i, x j ] = i l3 s 3 Rijk p k, [x i, p j ] = i δ i j, [p i, p j ] = 0 Closed string nonassociativity (Jacobiator) [x i, x j, x k ] = l 3 s R ijk Quantization captured by nonassociative phase space star product (Mylonas, Schupp & RS 12; Bakas & Lüst 13; Kupriyanov & Vassilevich 15) (f g)(x) = k,k f (k) g(k ) e i 2 (k p k x kx k p ) e i l3 s 6 R (kx k x ) p e i (k+k ) x Nonassociative BCH formula captured by 3-cocycle: ( e i k x e i k x ) e i k x = e i l3 s 6 R k x (k x k x ) e i k x ( e i k x e i k x )
32 Parabolic R-flux model Twisted Poisson structure on phase space M = T M (Lüst 10) [x i, x j ] = i l3 s 3 Rijk p k, [x i, p j ] = i δ i j, [p i, p j ] = 0 Closed string nonassociativity (Jacobiator) [x i, x j, x k ] = l 3 s R ijk Quantization captured by nonassociative phase space star product (Mylonas, Schupp & RS 12; Bakas & Lüst 13; Kupriyanov & Vassilevich 15) (f g)(x) = k,k f (k) g(k ) e i 2 (k p k x kx k p ) e i l3 s 6 R (kx k x ) p e i (k+k ) x Nonassociative BCH formula captured by 3-cocycle: ( e i k x e i k x ) e i k x = e i l3 s 6 R k x (k x k x ) e i k x ( e i k x e i k x ) Closure, 3-cyclicity: f g = f g, (f g) h = f (g h)
33 Nonassociative quantum mechanics (Mylonas, Schupp & RS 13; Bojowald, Brahma, Büyükçam & Strobl 14; Bojowald, Brahma & Büyükçam 15; Kupriyanov & RS 18; Bunk, Müller & RS 18)
34 Nonassociative quantum mechanics (Mylonas, Schupp & RS 13; Bojowald, Brahma, Büyükçam & Strobl 14; Bojowald, Brahma & Büyükçam 15; Kupriyanov & RS 18; Bunk, Müller & RS 18) Phase space quantum mechanics:
35 Nonassociative quantum mechanics (Mylonas, Schupp & RS 13; Bojowald, Brahma, Büyükçam & Strobl 14; Bojowald, Brahma & Büyükçam 15; Kupriyanov & RS 18; Bunk, Müller & RS 18) Phase space quantum mechanics: Observables: Real-valued functions f (x, p)
36 Nonassociative quantum mechanics (Mylonas, Schupp & RS 13; Bojowald, Brahma, Büyükçam & Strobl 14; Bojowald, Brahma & Büyükçam 15; Kupriyanov & RS 18; Bunk, Müller & RS 18) Phase space quantum mechanics: Observables: Real-valued functions f (x, p) Dynamics: f t = i [H, f ]
37 Nonassociative quantum mechanics (Mylonas, Schupp & RS 13; Bojowald, Brahma, Büyükçam & Strobl 14; Bojowald, Brahma & Büyükçam 15; Kupriyanov & RS 18; Bunk, Müller & RS 18) Phase space quantum mechanics: Observables: Real-valued functions f (x, p) f Dynamics: = i t [H, f ] States: Normalized phase space wavefunctions ψ a Statistical probabilities µ a [0, 1]
38 Nonassociative quantum mechanics (Mylonas, Schupp & RS 13; Bojowald, Brahma, Büyükçam & Strobl 14; Bojowald, Brahma & Büyükçam 15; Kupriyanov & RS 18; Bunk, Müller & RS 18) Phase space quantum mechanics: Observables: Real-valued functions f (x, p) f Dynamics: = i t [H, f ] States: Normalized phase space wavefunctions ψ a Statistical probabilities µ a [0, 1] Expectation values: f = µ a ψa (f ψ a ) = a f S S = a µ a ψ a ψ a
39 Nonassociative quantum mechanics (Mylonas, Schupp & RS 13; Bojowald, Brahma, Büyükçam & Strobl 14; Bojowald, Brahma & Büyükçam 15; Kupriyanov & RS 18; Bunk, Müller & RS 18) Phase space quantum mechanics: Observables: Real-valued functions f (x, p) f Dynamics: = i t [H, f ] States: Normalized phase space wavefunctions ψ a Statistical probabilities µ a [0, 1] Expectation values: f = µ a ψa (f ψ a ) = a f S S = a µ a ψ a ψ a Positivity, reality,... using closure, 3-cyclicity, Hermiticity (f g) = g f, and unitality f 1 = f = 1 f
40 Spacetime quantization
41 Spacetime quantization Coarse-graining of spacetime with R-flux: Nonassociating observables cannot have common eigen-states x I S = λ I S
42 Spacetime quantization Coarse-graining of spacetime with R-flux: Nonassociating observables cannot have common eigen-states x I S = λ I S Oriented area and volume (uncertainty) operators: A IJ = Im ( [ x I, x J ] ) = i ( x I x J x J x I ) V IJK = 1 3 Re( x I [ x J, x K ] + x K [ x I, x J ] + x J [ x K, x I ] ) Shifted coordinates x I := x I x I
43 Spacetime quantization Coarse-graining of spacetime with R-flux: Nonassociating observables cannot have common eigen-states x I S = λ I S Oriented area and volume (uncertainty) operators: A IJ = Im ( [ x I, x J ] ) = i ( x I x J x J x I ) V IJK = 1 3 Re( x I [ x J, x K ] + x K [ x I, x J ] + x J [ x K, x I ] ) Shifted coordinates x I := x I x I Minimal area and volume: A x i,p j = δ i j, A ij = l3 s 3 Rijk p k, Quantized spacetime with cells of minimal volume V ijk = l3 s 2 R ijk l3 s 2 R ijk
44 Spacetime quantization Coarse-graining of spacetime with R-flux: Nonassociating observables cannot have common eigen-states x I S = λ I S Oriented area and volume (uncertainty) operators: A IJ = Im ( [ x I, x J ] ) = i ( x I x J x J x I ) V IJK = 1 3 Re( x I [ x J, x K ] + x K [ x I, x J ] + x J [ x K, x I ] ) Shifted coordinates x I := x I x I Minimal area and volume: A x i,p j = δ i j, A ij = l3 s 3 Rijk p k, Quantized spacetime with cells of minimal volume V ijk = l3 s 2 R ijk l3 s 2 R ijk Freed Witten anomaly: No D3-branes on T 3 with H-flux No D0-branes in R-flux background (Wecht 07) T ijk
45 Nonassociative geometry
46 Nonassociative geometry Configuration space triproducts (Aschieri & RS 15) (f g h)(x) = ( f (x) g(x) ) h(x) p=0
47 Nonassociative geometry Configuration space triproducts (Aschieri & RS 15) (f g h)(x) = ( f (x) g(x) ) h(x) p=0 = f (k x ) g(k x) h(k x ) e i l 3 s k x,k x,k x 12 R kx (k x k x ) e i (kx +k x +k x ) x
48 Nonassociative geometry Configuration space triproducts (Aschieri & RS 15) (f g h)(x) = ( f (x) g(x) ) h(x) p=0 = f (k x ) g(k x) h(k x ) e i l 3 s k x,k x,k x 12 R kx (k x k x ) e i (kx +k x +k x ) x Quantizes 3-bracket [f, g, h] = Asym(f g h) (Takhtajan 94) [x i, x j, x k ] = l 3 s R ijk
49 Nonassociative geometry Configuration space triproducts (Aschieri & RS 15) (f g h)(x) = ( f (x) g(x) ) h(x) p=0 = f (k x ) g(k x) h(k x ) e i l 3 s k x,k x,k x 12 R kx (k x k x ) e i (kx +k x +k x ) x Quantizes 3-bracket [f, g, h] = Asym(f g h) (Takhtajan 94) [x i, x j, x k ] = l 3 s R ijk Agrees with triproducts of tachyon vertex operators after T-duality in CFT perturbation theory around flat space with constant H-flux (Blumenhagen, Deser, Lüst, Plauschinn & Rennecke 11)
50 Nonassociative geometry Configuration space triproducts (Aschieri & RS 15) (f g h)(x) = ( f (x) g(x) ) h(x) p=0 = f (k x ) g(k x) h(k x ) e i l 3 s k x,k x,k x 12 R kx (k x k x ) e i (kx +k x +k x ) x Quantizes 3-bracket [f, g, h] = Asym(f g h) (Takhtajan 94) [x i, x j, x k ] = l 3 s R ijk Agrees with triproducts of tachyon vertex operators after T-duality in CFT perturbation theory around flat space with constant H-flux (Blumenhagen, Deser, Lüst, Plauschinn & Rennecke 11) Violates strong constraint of Double Field Theory (Blumenhagen, Fuchs, Hassler, Lüst & Sun 14)
51 Nonassociative geometry Configuration space triproducts (Aschieri & RS 15) (f g h)(x) = ( f (x) g(x) ) h(x) p=0 = f (k x ) g(k x) h(k x ) e i l 3 s k x,k x,k x 12 R kx (k x k x ) e i (kx +k x +k x ) x Quantizes 3-bracket [f, g, h] = Asym(f g h) (Takhtajan 94) [x i, x j, x k ] = l 3 s R ijk Agrees with triproducts of tachyon vertex operators after T-duality in CFT perturbation theory around flat space with constant H-flux (Blumenhagen, Deser, Lüst, Plauschinn & Rennecke 11) Violates strong constraint of Double Field Theory (Blumenhagen, Fuchs, Hassler, Lüst & Sun 14) On-shell associativity: f g h = f g h
52 (Günaydin, Lüst & Malek 16) M-theory lift of R-flux model
53 M-theory lift of R-flux model (Günaydin, Lüst & Malek 16) S 1 M M S 1 radius λ string coupling g s
54 M-theory lift of R-flux model (Günaydin, Lüst & Malek 16) S 1 M M S 1 radius λ string coupling g s Generate string R-flux starting from twisted torus M = T 3 : T jk R ijk f i jk
55 M-theory lift of R-flux model (Günaydin, Lüst & Malek 16) S 1 M M S 1 radius λ string coupling g s Generate string R-flux starting from twisted torus M = T 3 : T jk R ijk f i jk Lift to M-theory on M = M S 1 x 4 : T-duality = U-duality
56 M-theory lift of R-flux model (Günaydin, Lüst & Malek 16) S 1 M M S 1 radius λ string coupling g s Generate string R-flux starting from twisted torus M = T 3 : T jk R ijk f i jk Lift to M-theory on M = M S 1 x 4 : T-duality = U-duality U µνρ In SL(5) Exceptional Field Theory: C µνρ Ω µνρ with R µ,νραβ = ˆ µ[ν Ω ραβ] (Not a 5-vector!) (Blair & Malek 14)
57 M-theory lift of R-flux model (Günaydin, Lüst & Malek 16) S 1 M M S 1 radius λ string coupling g s Generate string R-flux starting from twisted torus M = T 3 : T jk R ijk f i jk Lift to M-theory on M = M S 1 x 4 : T-duality = U-duality U µνρ In SL(5) Exceptional Field Theory: C µνρ Ω µνρ with R µ,νραβ = ˆ µ[ν Ω ραβ] (Not a 5-vector!) (Blair & Malek 14) Choice R 4,µναβ = R ε µναβ breaks SL(5) SO(4)
58 M-theory phase space
59 M-theory phase space Sends membrane wrapping (w ij ) H 2( M, Z) to momenta (p i )
60 M-theory phase space Sends membrane wrapping (w ij ) H 2( M, Z) to momenta (p i ) No D0-branes on M = p 4 = 0 along M-theory direction: H 2( M, Z) = H 1( T 3, Z) H 2( T 3, Z) = Z 2 Z [H] Z 2 Restored for R = 0: H 2(T 3, Z) = Z 3
61 M-theory phase space Sends membrane wrapping (w ij ) H 2( M, Z) to momenta (p i ) No D0-branes on M = p 4 = 0 along M-theory direction: H 2( M, Z) = H 1( T 3, Z) H 2( T 3, Z) = Z 2 Z [H] Z 2 Restored for R = 0: H 2(T 3, Z) = Z 3 R µ,νραβ p µ = 0 = 7D phase space M: [x i, x j ] = i l 3 s 3 R4,ijk4 p k, [x 4, x i ] = i λ l3 s 3 R4,1234 p i [x i, p j ] = i δ i j x 4 + i λ ε i jk x k, [x 4, p i ] = i λ 2 x i [p i, p j ] = i λ ε ijk p k [x i, x j, x k ] = i l 3 s 3 R4,ijk4 x 4, [x i, x j, x 4 ] = i λ2 l 3 s 3 R 4,ijk4 x k [p i, x j, x k ] = i λ l 3 ( s 3 R4,1234 δ j i p k δ k i p j ), [p i, x j, x 4 ] = i λ2 l 3 s 3 R 4,ijk4 p k [p i, p j, x k ] = i λ 2 ε ij k x 4 i λ ( δ k j x i δ k i x j ), [pi, p j, x 4 ] = i λ 3 ε ijk x k [p i, p j, p k ] = 0
62 M-theory phase space Sends membrane wrapping (w ij ) H 2( M, Z) to momenta (p i ) No D0-branes on M = p 4 = 0 along M-theory direction: H 2( M, Z) = H 1( T 3, Z) H 2( T 3, Z) = Z 2 Z [H] Z 2 Restored for R = 0: H 2(T 3, Z) = Z 3 R µ,νραβ p µ = 0 = 7D phase space M: [x i, x j ] = i l 3 s 3 R4,ijk4 p k, [x 4, x i ] = i λ l3 s 3 R4,1234 p i [x i, p j ] = i δ i j x 4 + i λ ε i jk x k, [x 4, p i ] = i λ 2 x i [p i, p j ] = i λ ε ijk p k [x i, x j, x k ] = i l 3 s 3 R4,ijk4 x 4, [x i, x j, x 4 ] = i λ2 l 3 s 3 R 4,ijk4 x k [p i, x j, x k ] = i λ l 3 ( s 3 R4,1234 δ j i p k δ k i p j ), [p i, x j, x 4 ] = i λ2 l 3 s 3 R 4,ijk4 p k [p i, p j, x k ] = i λ 2 ε ij k x 4 i λ ( δ k j x i δ k i x j ), [pi, p j, x 4 ] = i λ 3 ε ijk x k [p i, p j, p k ] = 0 Reduces to string R-flux algebra at λ = 0 (with x 4 = 1 central)
63 Octonionic phase space
64 Octonionic phase space Originates from nonassociative, alternative, octonion algebra O: (x A ) = (x i, x 4 (, p i ) = Λ (e A ) = 1 λ l 4 2 s R/3 f i, λ 3 l 4 s R/3 e 7, λ e i )
65 Octonionic phase space Originates from nonassociative, alternative, octonion algebra O: (x A ) = (x i, x 4 (, p i ) = Λ (e A ) = 1 λ l 4 2 s R/3 f i, Imaginary unit octonions: λ 3 l 4 s R/3 e 7, λ e i ) e A e B = δ AB 1+η ABC e C, η ABC = +1 for ABC = 123, 435, 471,...
66 Octonionic phase space Originates from nonassociative, alternative, octonion algebra O: (x A ) = (x i, x 4 (, p i ) = Λ (e A ) = 1 λ l 4 2 s R/3 f i, Imaginary unit octonions: λ 3 l 4 s R/3 e 7, λ e i ) e A e B = δ AB 1+η ABC e C, η ABC = +1 for ABC = 123, 435, 471,... Octonionic commutator [e A, e B ] = 2 η ABC e C (f i = e i+3, i = 1, 2, 3): has components [e i, e j ] = 2 ε ijk e k, [e 7, e i ] = 2 f i [f i, f j ] = 2 ε ijk e k, [e 7, f i ] = 2 e i [e i, f j ] = 2 (δ ij e 7 ε ijk f k )
67 Octonionic phase space Originates from nonassociative, alternative, octonion algebra O: (x A ) = (x i, x 4 (, p i ) = Λ (e A ) = 1 λ l 4 2 s R/3 f i, Imaginary unit octonions: λ 3 l 4 s R/3 e 7, λ e i ) e A e B = δ AB 1+η ABC e C, η ABC = +1 for ABC = 123, 435, 471,... Octonionic commutator [e A, e B ] = 2 η ABC e C (f i = e i+3, i = 1, 2, 3): has components [e i, e j ] = 2 ε ijk e k, [e 7, e i ] = 2 f i [f i, f j ] = 2 ε ijk e k, [e 7, f i ] = 2 e i [e i, f j ] = 2 (δ ij e 7 ε ijk f k ) Jacobiator: [e A, e B, e C ] = 12 η ABCD e D = 6 ( (e A e B ) e C e A (e B e C ) ) η ABCD = +1 for ABCD = 1267, 1425, 1346,...
68 (Kupriyanov & RS 17) G 2 -structures
69 G 2 -structures (Kupriyanov & RS 17) 4 normed algebras over R: R, C, H, O
70 G 2 -structures (Kupriyanov & RS 17) 4 normed algebras over R: R, C, H, O 4 real inner product spaces with cross product: (R 0, 0) (R 1, 0) (R 3, ) (R 7, η) 0 0 (k p) i = ε ijk k j p k ( k η p ) A = η ABC k B p C SO(3) G 2 SO(7)
71 G 2 -structures (Kupriyanov & RS 17) 4 normed algebras over R: R, C, H, O 4 real inner product spaces with cross product: (R 0, 0) (R 1, 0) (R 3, ) (R 7, η) 0 0 (k p) i = ε ijk k j p k ( k η p ) A = η ABC k B p C SO(3) G 2 SO(7) Jacobiator: J η( k, k, k ) = ( k η k ) η k + ( k η k ) η k + ( k η k ) η k 0
72 G 2 -structures (Kupriyanov & RS 17) 4 normed algebras over R: R, C, H, O 4 real inner product spaces with cross product: (R 0, 0) (R 1, 0) (R 3, ) (R 7, η) 0 0 (k p) i = ε ijk k j p k ( k η p ) A = η ABC k B p C SO(3) G 2 SO(7) Jacobiator: J η( k, k, k ) = ( k η k ) η k + ( k η k ) η k + ( k η k ) η k 0 Represented on O through X k = k A e A : [ ] [ X k η k = 1 X k, X 2 k, X Jη( k, k, k ) = 1 X k, X 4 k, X k ]
73 G 2 -structures (Kupriyanov & RS 17) 4 normed algebras over R: R, C, H, O 4 real inner product spaces with cross product: (R 0, 0) (R 1, 0) (R 3, ) (R 7, η) 0 0 (k p) i = ε ijk k j p k ( k η p ) A = η ABC k B p C SO(3) G 2 SO(7) Jacobiator: J η( k, k, k ) = ( k η k ) η k + ( k η k ) η k + ( k η k ) η k 0 Represented on O through X k = k A e A : [ ] [ X k η k = 1 X k, X 2 k, X Jη( k, k, k ) = 1 X k, X 4 k, X k ] Alternativity (X X ) X = X (X X ) defines octonion exponential: e X k = cos k 1 + sin k k X k
74 Octonionic BCH formula
75 Octonionic BCH formula BCH formula e X k e X k = e X Bη ( k, k ) can be computed explicitly in terms of vector star sums of p, p B 7 R 7 : p η p ( = ɛ p, p 1 p 2 p + 1 p 2 p p η p )
76 Octonionic BCH formula BCH formula e X k e X k = e X Bη ( k, k ) can be computed explicitly in terms of vector star sums of p, p B 7 R 7 : p η p ( = ɛ p, p 1 p 2 p + 1 p 2 p p η p ) Noncommutativity/nonassociativity: p η p p η p = 2 p η p A η( p, p, p ) = ( p η p ) η p p η ( p η p ) = 2 3 J η( p, p, p )
77 Octonionic BCH formula BCH formula e X k e X k = e X Bη ( k, k ) can be computed explicitly in terms of vector star sums of p, p B 7 R 7 : p η p ( = ɛ p, p 1 p 2 p + 1 p 2 p p η p ) Noncommutativity/nonassociativity: p η p p η p = 2 p η p A η( p, p, p ) = ( p η p ) η p p η ( p η p ) = 2 3 J η( p, p, p ) Extend to all k R 7 : B η ( k, k ) = sin 1 p η p p η p p η p p= k sin( k )/ k
78 Octonionic BCH formula BCH formula e X k e X k = e X Bη ( k, k ) can be computed explicitly in terms of vector star sums of p, p B 7 R 7 : p η p ( = ɛ p, p 1 p 2 p + 1 p 2 p p η p ) Noncommutativity/nonassociativity: p η p p η p = 2 p η p A η( p, p, p ) = ( p η p ) η p p η ( p η p ) = 2 3 J η( p, p, p ) Extend to all k R 7 : B η ( k, k ) = sin 1 p η p p η p p η p p= k sin( k )/ k = k + k 2 k η k + O( 2 )
79 Quantization of M-theory phase space
80 Quantization of M-theory phase space Nonassociative phase space star product: (f λ g)( x ) = f ( k ) g( k ) e i B η(λ k,λ k ) Λ 1 x k, k
81 Quantization of M-theory phase space Nonassociative phase space star product: (f λ g)( x ) = f ( k ) g( k ) e i B η(λ k,λ k ) Λ 1 x k, k Nonassociative BCH formula captured by 2-group addition : ( e i k x λ e i k x ) λ e i k x = e i A η(λ k,λ k,λ k ) e i k x λ ( e i k x λ e i k x ) A η( k, k, k ) = sin 1 ( p η p ) η p ( p η p ) η p A η( p, p, p ) p= k sin( k )/ k
82 Quantization of M-theory phase space Nonassociative phase space star product: (f λ g)( x ) = f ( k ) g( k ) e i B η(λ k,λ k ) Λ 1 x k, k Nonassociative BCH formula captured by 2-group addition : ( e i k x λ e i k x ) λ e i k x = e i A η(λ k,λ k,λ k ) e i k x λ ( e i k x λ e i k x ) A η( k, k, k ) = sin 1 ( p η p ) η p ( p η p ) η p A η( p, p, p ) p= k sin( k )/ k Using x 4 λ f = x 4 f + O(λ) reduces to string star product: lim (f λ g)( x ) = (f g)(x) λ 0
83 Quantization of M-theory phase space Nonassociative phase space star product: (f λ g)( x ) = f ( k ) g( k ) e i B η(λ k,λ k ) Λ 1 x k, k Nonassociative BCH formula captured by 2-group addition : ( e i k x λ e i k x ) λ e i k x = e i A η(λ k,λ k,λ k ) e i k x λ ( e i k x λ e i k x ) A η( k, k, k ) = sin 1 ( p η p ) η p ( p η p ) η p A η( p, p, p ) p= k sin( k )/ k Using x 4 λ f = x 4 f + O(λ) reduces to string star product: lim (f λ g)( x ) = (f g)(x) λ 0 Gauge-equivalent closed, 3-cyclic star product: f λ g = D 1( Df λ Dg ), D = 1 + O(λ)
84 Spacetime quantization in M-theory
85 Spacetime quantization in M-theory Using λ we can calculate:
86 Spacetime quantization in M-theory Using λ we can calculate: Minimal areas: A ij = l3 s 3 R 4,ijk4 p k, A 4i = λ l3 s 3 R 4,1234 p i A x i,p j = δ i j x 4 + λ ε i jk x k, A x 4,p i = λ 2 x i A p i,p j = λ εijk p k
87 Spacetime quantization in M-theory Using λ we can calculate: Minimal areas: A ij = l3 s 3 R 4,ijk4 p k, A 4i = λ l3 s 3 R 4,1234 p i A x i,p j = δ i j x 4 + λ ε i jk x k, A x 4,p i = λ 2 x i A p i,p j = λ εijk p k Minimal volumes: V ijk = l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 x 4, V ij4 = λ2 l 3 s 2 V p i,xj,x k = λ l3 s 2 V p i,p j,xk = λ 2 2 R 4,ijk4 x k R 4,1234 ( δ j i p k δ k i p j ), V p i,x j,x 4 = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p k λ k εij x 4 + δ k j x i δ k i x j p, V i,p j,x 4 = λ3 2 2 εijk x k
88 Nonassociative geometry in M-theory
89 Nonassociative geometry in M-theory Configuration space triproducts: ( f λ g λ h ) ( x ) = ( (f λ g) λ h ) (x µ, p i ) p=0 = f ( k ) g( k ) h( k ) e i TΛ ( k, k, k ) Λ 1 x k, k, k
90 Nonassociative geometry in M-theory Configuration space triproducts: ( f λ g λ h ) ( x ) = ( (f λ g) λ h ) (x µ, p i ) p=0 = f ( k ) g( k ) h( k ) e i TΛ ( k, k, k ) Λ 1 x k, k, k T Λ ( k, k, k ) = sin 1 ( p η p ) η p ( p η p ) η p + ɛ p, p 1 p η p 2 p + ɛ p, p ( Aη ( p, p, p ) + ɛ p, p 1 p η p 2 p 1 p η p 2 p ) p=λ k sin( Λ k )/ Λ k
91 Nonassociative geometry in M-theory Configuration space triproducts: ( f λ g λ h ) ( x ) = ( (f λ g) λ h ) (x µ, p i ) p=0 = f ( k ) g( k ) h( k ) e i TΛ ( k, k, k ) Λ 1 x k, k, k T Λ ( k, k, k ) = sin 1 ( p η p ) η p ( p η p ) η p + ɛ p, p 1 p η p 2 p + ɛ p, p ( Aη ( p, p, p ) + ɛ p, p 1 p η p 2 p 1 p η p 2 p ) p=λ k sin( Λ k )/ Λ k ( = Λ k + k + k + 2 ( 1 2 2Λ Aη(Λ k, Λ k, Λ k ) + Λ k + Λ k 2 k + Λ k + Λ k 2 k + Λ k + Λ k 2 ) ) k + O(λ)
92 Nonassociative geometry in M-theory Configuration space triproducts: ( f λ g λ h ) ( x ) = ( (f λ g) λ h ) (x µ, p i ) p=0 = f ( k ) g( k ) h( k ) e i TΛ ( k, k, k ) Λ 1 x k, k, k T Λ ( k, k, k ) = sin 1 ( p η p ) η p ( p η p ) η p + ɛ p, p 1 p η p 2 p + ɛ p, p ( Aη ( p, p, p ) + ɛ p, p 1 p η p 2 p 1 p η p 2 p ) p=λ k sin( Λ k )/ Λ k ( = Λ k + k + k + 2 ( 1 2 2Λ Aη(Λ k, Λ k, Λ k ) + Λ k + Λ k 2 k + Λ k + Λ k 2 k + Λ k + Λ k 2 ) ) k + O(λ) Quantizes 3-bracket [f, g, h] λ = Asym(f λ g λ h) for A 4 : [x µ, x ν, x α ] 1 = l 3 s R ε µναβ x β
93 Noncommutative M-theory momentum space
94 Noncommutative M-theory momentum space Setting x µ = 0 reveals noncommutative associative deformation of momentum space with η, independent of R-flux: (Guedes, Oriti & Raasakka 13; Kupriyanov & Vitale 15) (f λ g)(p) = l,l f (l) g(l ) e 2 i λ B( λ 2 l, λ 2 l ) p
95 Noncommutative M-theory momentum space Setting x µ = 0 reveals noncommutative associative deformation of momentum space with η, independent of R-flux: (Guedes, Oriti & Raasakka 13; Kupriyanov & Vitale 15) (f λ g)(p) = l,l f (l) g(l ) e 2 i λ B( λ 2 l, λ 2 l ) p Restrict to (x µ ) S 3 R 4 of radius 1 λ : [p i, p j ] = i λ ε ijk p k, [x i, p j ] = i λ 1 λ 2 x 2 δ i j + i λ ε i jk x k
96 Noncommutative M-theory momentum space Setting x µ = 0 reveals noncommutative associative deformation of momentum space with η, independent of R-flux: (Guedes, Oriti & Raasakka 13; Kupriyanov & Vitale 15) (f λ g)(p) = l,l f (l) g(l ) e 2 i λ B( λ 2 l, λ 2 l ) p Restrict to (x µ ) S 3 R 4 of radius 1 λ : [p i, p j ] = i λ ε ijk p k, [x i, p j ] = i λ 1 λ 2 x 2 δ i j + i λ ε i jk x k Familiar from 3D quantum gravity (Freidel & Livine 06)
97 Spin(7)-structures
98 Spin(7)-structures Triple cross product of K = (KÂ) = (k 0, k ) R 8 = R R 7 : (K φ K φ K )Â := φâ ˆBĈ ˆD K ˆB K Ĉ K ˆD φ 0ABC = η ABC, φ ABCD = η ABCD
99 Spin(7)-structures Triple cross product of K = (KÂ) = (k 0, k ) R 8 = R R 7 : (K φ K φ K )Â := φâ ˆBĈ ˆD K ˆB K Ĉ K ˆD φ 0ABC = η ABC, φ ABCD = η ABCD K φ K φ K = ( k ( k η k ), 1 12 J η( k, k, k ) k 0 ( k η k ) k 0 ( k η k ) k 0 ( k η k ) )
100 Spin(7)-structures Triple cross product of K = (KÂ) = (k 0, k ) R 8 = R R 7 : (K φ K φ K )Â := φâ ˆBĈ ˆD K ˆB K Ĉ K ˆD φ 0ABC = η ABC, φ ABCD = η ABCD K φ K φ K = ( k ( k η k ), 1 12 J η( k, k, k ) k 0 ( k η k ) k 0 ( k η k ) k 0 ( k η k ) ) Preserved by Spin(7) SO(8), extends representation [ ] X k η k = 1 2 XK, X K on octonions XK = k k A e A O: X K φ K φ K = ( ) 1 2 (XK X K ) X K (X K X K ) X K
101 Spin(7)-structures Triple cross product of K = (KÂ) = (k 0, k ) R 8 = R R 7 : (K φ K φ K )Â := φâ ˆBĈ ˆD K ˆB K Ĉ K ˆD φ 0ABC = η ABC, φ ABCD = η ABCD K φ K φ K = ( k ( k η k ), 1 12 J η( k, k, k ) k 0 ( k η k ) k 0 ( k η k ) k 0 ( k η k ) ) Preserved by Spin(7) SO(8), extends representation [ ] X k η k = 1 2 XK, X K on octonions XK = k k A e A O: X K φ K φ K = ( ) 1 2 (XK X K ) X K (X K X K ) X K Spin(7) G 2 : k η k = k φ (1, 0 ) φ k
102 Spin(7)-structures Triple cross product of K = (KÂ) = (k 0, k ) R 8 = R R 7 : (K φ K φ K )Â := φâ ˆBĈ ˆD K ˆB K Ĉ K ˆD φ 0ABC = η ABC, φ ABCD = η ABCD K φ K φ K = ( k ( k η k ), 1 12 J η( k, k, k ) k 0 ( k η k ) k 0 ( k η k ) k 0 ( k η k ) ) Preserved by Spin(7) SO(8), extends representation [ ] X k η k = 1 2 XK, X K on octonions XK = k k A e A O: X K φ K φ K = ( ) 1 2 (XK X K ) X K (X K X K ) X K Spin(7) G 2 : k η k = k φ (1, 0 ) φ k Trivector: [ξâ, ξ ˆB, ξ Ĉ ] φ = φâ ˆBĈ ˆD ξ ˆD for ξ = (ξ 0, ξ ) = (1, e A )
103 Covariant M-theory phase space 3-algebra
104 Covariant M-theory phase space 3-algebra 8D phase space coordinates X = (x µ, p µ ) = (Λ ξ, λ 2 ξ 0) have SO(4) SO(4)-symmetric 3-brackets: [x i, x j, x k ] φ = l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 x 4, [x i, x j, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 x k [p i, x j, x k ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p 4 λ l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p k [p i, x j, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,1234 δ j i p 4 λ2 l 3 s [p i, p j, x k ] φ = λ2 2 ε ij k x λ 2 2 R 4,ijk4 p k ( δ k j x i δ k i x j ) [p i, p j, x 4 ] φ = 2 λ 3 2 ε ijk x k, [p i, p j, p k ] φ = 2 2 λ ε ijk p 4 [p 4, x i, x j ] φ = λ l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p k, [p 4, x i, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,1234 p i, [p 4, p i, x j ] φ = 2 λ 2 δ j i x 4 2 λ 2 2 ε i jk x k [p 4, p i, x 4 ] φ = 2 λ 3 2 x i, [p 4, p i, p j ] φ = 2 λ 2 2 ε ijk p k
105 Covariant M-theory phase space 3-algebra 8D phase space coordinates X = (x µ, p µ ) = (Λ ξ, λ 2 ξ 0) have SO(4) SO(4)-symmetric 3-brackets: [x i, x j, x k ] φ = l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 x 4, [x i, x j, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 x k [p i, x j, x k ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p 4 λ l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p k [p i, x j, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,1234 δ j i p 4 λ2 l 3 s [p i, p j, x k ] φ = λ2 2 ε ij k x λ 2 2 R 4,ijk4 p k ( δ k j x i δ k i x j ) [p i, p j, x 4 ] φ = 2 λ 3 2 ε ijk x k, [p i, p j, p k ] φ = 2 2 λ ε ijk p 4 [p 4, x i, x j ] φ = λ l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p k, [p 4, x i, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,1234 p i, [p 4, p i, x j ] φ = 2 λ 2 δ j i x 4 2 λ 2 2 ε i jk x k [p 4, p i, x 4 ] φ = 2 λ 3 2 x i, [p 4, p i, p j ] φ = 2 λ 2 2 ε ijk p k [f, g] G := [f, g, G] φ for any constraint G(X ) = 0;
106 Covariant M-theory phase space 3-algebra 8D phase space coordinates X = (x µ, p µ ) = (Λ ξ, λ 2 ξ 0) have SO(4) SO(4)-symmetric 3-brackets: [x i, x j, x k ] φ = l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 x 4, [x i, x j, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 x k [p i, x j, x k ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p 4 λ l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p k [p i, x j, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,1234 δ j i p 4 λ2 l 3 s [p i, p j, x k ] φ = λ2 2 ε ij k x λ 2 2 R 4,ijk4 p k ( δ k j x i δ k i x j ) [p i, p j, x 4 ] φ = 2 λ 3 2 ε ijk x k, [p i, p j, p k ] φ = 2 2 λ ε ijk p 4 [p 4, x i, x j ] φ = λ l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p k, [p 4, x i, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,1234 p i, [p 4, p i, x j ] φ = 2 λ 2 δ j i x 4 2 λ 2 2 ε i jk x k [p 4, p i, x 4 ] φ = 2 λ 3 2 x i, [p 4, p i, p j ] φ = 2 λ 2 2 ε ijk p k [f, g] G := [f, g, G] φ for any constraint G(X ) = 0; e.g. G(X ) = 2 λ p 2 4 or G(X ) = R µ,νραβ p µ
107 Covariant M-theory phase space 3-algebra 8D phase space coordinates X = (x µ, p µ ) = (Λ ξ, λ 2 ξ 0) have SO(4) SO(4)-symmetric 3-brackets: [x i, x j, x k ] φ = l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 x 4, [x i, x j, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 x k [p i, x j, x k ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p 4 λ l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p k [p i, x j, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,1234 δ j i p 4 λ2 l 3 s [p i, p j, x k ] φ = λ2 2 ε ij k x λ 2 2 R 4,ijk4 p k ( δ k j x i δ k i x j ) [p i, p j, x 4 ] φ = 2 λ 3 2 ε ijk x k, [p i, p j, p k ] φ = 2 2 λ ε ijk p 4 [p 4, x i, x j ] φ = λ l3 s 2 R 4,ijk4 p k, [p 4, x i, x 4 ] φ = λ2 l 3 s 2 R 4,1234 p i, [p 4, p i, x j ] φ = 2 λ 2 δ j i x 4 2 λ 2 2 ε i jk x k [p 4, p i, x 4 ] φ = 2 λ 3 2 x i, [p 4, p i, p j ] φ = 2 λ 2 2 ε ijk p k [f, g] G := [f, g, G] φ for any constraint G(X ) = 0; e.g. G(X ) = 2 λ p 2 4 or G(X ) = R µ,νραβ p µ SO(4)-invariance: S (R 4 ) (Günaydin, Lüst & Malek 16) Trivector modelled on negative chirality spinors
108 Vector trisums
109 Vector trisums Restrict X P X P = ( p 0 p 0 p p ) 1 + p 0 X p + p 0 X p + X p η p to P, P S 7 = Spin(7)/G 2 R 8 : X p η p = Im( X P X P ), ɛ p, p = sgn Re ( X P X P )
110 Vector trisums Restrict X P X P = ( p 0 p 0 p p ) 1 + p 0 X p + p 0 X p + X p η p to P, P S 7 = Spin(7)/G 2 R 8 : X p η p = Im( X P X P ), ɛ p, p = sgn Re ( X P X P ) Extend to vector trisum X p φ p φ p = Im( (X P X P ) X P ) : p φ p φ p 1 p η p 2 p + ɛ p, p 1 p η ( p ) 2 p ( = ɛ p, p, p ɛ p, p + ɛ p, p 1 p η p 2 p + A η( p, p, p ) + 1 p 2 ( p η p ) + 1 p 2 ( p η p ) + 1 p 2 ( p η p ))
111 Vector trisums Restrict X P X P = ( p 0 p 0 p p ) 1 + p 0 X p + p 0 X p + X p η p to P, P S 7 = Spin(7)/G 2 R 8 : X p η p = Im( X P X P ), ɛ p, p = sgn Re ( X P X P ) Extend to vector trisum X p φ p φ p = Im( (X P X P ) X P ) : p φ p φ p 1 p η p 2 p + ɛ p, p 1 p η ( p ) 2 p ( = ɛ p, p, p ɛ p, p + ɛ p, p 1 p η p 2 p + A η( p, p, p ) + 1 p 2 ( p η p ) + 1 p 2 ( p η p ) + 1 p 2 ( p η p )) Spin(7) G 2 : p η p = p φ 0 φ p
112 Vector trisums Restrict X P X P = ( p 0 p 0 p p ) 1 + p 0 X p + p 0 X p + X p η p to P, P S 7 = Spin(7)/G 2 R 8 : X p η p = Im( X P X P ), ɛ p, p = sgn Re ( X P X P ) Extend to vector trisum X p φ p φ p = Im( (X P X P ) X P ) : p φ p φ p 1 p η p 2 p + ɛ p, p 1 p η ( p ) 2 p ( = ɛ p, p, p ɛ p, p + ɛ p, p 1 p η p 2 p + A η( p, p, p ) + 1 p 2 ( p η p ) + 1 p 2 ( p η p ) + 1 p 2 ( p η p )) Spin(7) G 2 : p η p = p φ 0 φ p Nonassociativity: Asym( p φ p φ p ) = Im(X P φ P φ P )
113 Phase space nonassociative geometry
114 Phase space nonassociative geometry Extend vector trisum to all k R 7 R 8 : B φ ( k, k, k ) = sin 1 p φ p φ p p p φ p φ p φ p φ p p= k sin( k )/ k
115 Phase space nonassociative geometry Extend vector trisum to all k R 7 R 8 : B φ ( k, k, k ) = sin 1 p φ p φ p p p φ p φ p φ p φ p p= k sin( k )/ k = k + k + k + ( k η k + k η k + k η ) k + 2 ( 2 2 Aη( k, k, k ) k + k 2 k k + k 2 k k + k 2 ) k + O ( 3)
116 Phase space nonassociative geometry Extend vector trisum to all k R 7 R 8 : B φ ( k, k, k ) = sin 1 p φ p φ p p p φ p φ p φ p φ p p= k sin( k )/ k = k + k + k + ( k η k + k η k + k η ) k + 2 ( 2 2 Aη( k, k, k ) k + k 2 k k + k 2 k k + k 2 ) k + O ( 3) Phase space triproducts: (f λ g λ h)( x ) = k, k, k f ( k ) g( k ) h( k ) e i B φ (Λ k,λ k,λ k ) Λ 1 x
117 Phase space nonassociative geometry Extend vector trisum to all k R 7 R 8 : B φ ( k, k, k ) = sin 1 p φ p φ p p p φ p φ p φ p φ p p= k sin( k )/ k = k + k + k + ( k η k + k η k + k η ) k + 2 ( 2 2 Aη( k, k, k ) k + k 2 k k + k 2 k k + k 2 ) k + O ( 3) Phase space triproducts: (f λ g λ h)( x ) = k, k, k f ( k ) g( k ) h( k ) e i B φ (Λ k,λ k,λ k ) Λ 1 x f λ g = f λ 1 λ g, f λ g λ h = (f λ g λ h) p=0
118 Phase space nonassociative geometry Extend vector trisum to all k R 7 R 8 : B φ ( k, k, k ) = sin 1 p φ p φ p p p φ p φ p φ p φ p p= k sin( k )/ k = k + k + k + ( k η k + k η k + k η ) k + 2 ( 2 2 Aη( k, k, k ) k + k 2 k k + k 2 k k + k 2 ) k + O ( 3) Phase space triproducts: (f λ g λ h)( x ) = k, k, k f ( k ) g( k ) h( k ) e i B φ (Λ k,λ k,λ k ) Λ 1 x f λ g = f λ 1 λ g, f λ g λ h = (f λ g λ h) p=0 3-bracket [f, g, h] λ = Asym(f λ g λ h) obeys: [f, g, 1] λ = 3 [f, g] λ, lim λ 0 [x i, x j, x k ] λ p=0 = l 3 s R ijk
Higher Structures in Non-Geometric M-Theory
Higher Structures in Non-Geometric M-Theory Richard Szabo Action MP 1405 Quantum Structure of Spacetime Noncommutativity and Physics: Quantum Spacetime Structures Bayrischzell April 24, 2017 Non-geometric
More informationAn Introduction to Nonassociative Physics
An Introduction to Nonassociative Physics Richard Szabo Action MP 1405 Quantum Structure of Spacetime Dualities and Generalized Geometries Corfu Summer Institute September 13, 2018 Outline Introduction:
More informationNon-Associative Flux Algebra in String and M-theory from Octonions
Non-Associative Flux Algebra in String and M-theory from Octonions DIETER LÜST (LMU, MPI) Corfu, September 15th, 2016 1 Non-Associative Flux Algebra in String and M-theory from Octonions DIETER LÜST (LMU,
More informationNon-associative Deformations of Geometry in Double Field Theory
Non-associative Deformations of Geometry in Double Field Theory Michael Fuchs Workshop Frontiers in String Phenomenology based on JHEP 04(2014)141 or arxiv:1312.0719 by R. Blumenhagen, MF, F. Haßler, D.
More informationMembrane σ-models and quantization of non-geometric flux backgrounds
Membrane σ-models and quantization of non-geometric flux backgrounds Peter Schupp Jacobs University Bremen ASC workshop Geometry and Physics Munich, November 19-23, 2012 joint work with D. Mylonas and
More informationNon-Commutative/Non-Associative Geometry and Non-geometric String Backgrounds
Non-Commutative/Non-Associative Geometry and Non-geometric String Backgrounds DIETER LÜST (LMU, MPI) Workshop on Non-Associativity in Physics and Related Mathematical Structures, PennState, 1st. May 2014
More informationNon-Associative Quantum Mechanics from Non-Geometric Strings. Peter Schupp
Non-Associative Quantum Mechanics from Non-Geometric Strings Peter Schupp Jacobs University Bremen Workshop on Non-Associativity in Physics and Related Mathematical Structures, IGS, PennState May 1-3,
More informationNon-commutative & non-associative closed string geometry from flux compactifications
Non-commutative & non-associative closed string geometry from flux compactifications Dieter Lüst, LMU (Arnold Sommerfeld Center) and MPI München Istanbul Conference, 4. August 2011 I) Introduction Closed
More informationNon-Associative Geometry and Double Field Theory
Non-Associative Geometry and Double Field Theory DIETER LÜST (LMU, MPI) Corfu, September 15, 2014 1 Outline: I) Introduction II) Non-geometric Backgrounds & Non-Commutativity/Non-Associativity (world sheet
More informationQuantization of 2-plectic Manifolds
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh Based on: Bayrischzell Workshop, 22.5.2011 Josh DeBellis, CS and Richard Szabo arxiv:1001.3275 (JMP), arxiv:1012.2236 (JHEP)
More informationThe Algebroid Structure of Double Field Theory
The Algebroid Structure of Double Field Theory Larisa Jonke Division of Theoretical Physics Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Based on: 1802.07003 with A. Chatzistavrakidis, F. S. Khoo and R. J. Szabo
More informationFlux Compactifications and Matrix Models for Superstrings
Flux Compactifications and Matrix Models for Superstrings Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis Institut für Theoretische Physik, Leibniz Universität Hannover Based on: A.C., 1108.1107 [hep-th] (PRD 84 (2011))
More informationQuantum Nambu Geometry in String Theory
in String Theory Centre for Particle Theory and Department of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK E-mail: chong-sun.chu@durham.ac.uk Proceedings of the Corfu Summer Institute
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 29 Sep 2017
EMPG 17 15 Magnetic monopoles and nonassociative deformations of quantum theory 1 arxiv:1709.10080v2 [hep-th] 29 Sep 2017 Richard J. Szabo Department of Mathematics, Heriot-Watt University, Colin Maclaurin
More informationNon-Associativity, Double Field Theory and Applications
Non-Associativity, Double Field Theory and Applications DIETER LÜST (LMU, MPI) Recent Developments in String Theory, Monte Verita, Ascona, July 25, 2014 1 Outline: I) Introduction II) Non-geometric Backgrounds
More informationDouble Field Theory and Stringy Geometry
Double Field Theory and Stringy Geometry String/M Theory Rich theory, novel duality symmetries and exotic structures Fundamental formulation? Supergravity limit - misses stringy features Infinite set of
More informationGlobal Seiberg-Witten quantization for U(n)-bundles on tori
Global Seiberg-Witten quantization for U(n)-bundles on tori Andreas Deser 1,2 Based on arxiv:1809.05426 with Paolo Aschieri 2,3 1 Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague 2 Istituto
More informationThe boundary state from open string fields. Yuji Okawa University of Tokyo, Komaba. March 9, 2009 at Nagoya
The boundary state from open string fields Yuji Okawa University of Tokyo, Komaba March 9, 2009 at Nagoya Based on arxiv:0810.1737 in collaboration with Kiermaier and Zwiebach (MIT) 1 1. Introduction Quantum
More informationM-Theory and Matrix Models
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Durham October 31, 2011 1 Why M-Theory? Whats new in M-Theory The M5-Brane 2 Superstrings Outline Why M-Theory? Whats new in M-Theory The M5-Brane There
More informationD-branes as a single object. SIS Dubna, Edvard Musaev
D-branes as a single object Edvard Musaev Moscow Inst of Physics and Technology; Kazan Federal University based on works with Eric Bergshoeff (Groningen U), Chris Blair (VUB), Axel Kleinschmidt (AEI MPG),
More informationNoncommutative Spacetime Geometries
Munich 06.11.2008 Noncommutative Spacetime Geometries Paolo Aschieri Centro Fermi, Roma, U.Piemonte Orientale, Alessandria Memorial Conference in Honor of Julius Wess I present a general program in NC
More informationWorkshop on Testing Fundamental Physics Principles Corfu, September 22-28, 2017.
Workshop on Testing Fundamental Physics Principles Corfu, September 22-28, 2017.. Observables and Dispersion Relations in κ-minkowski and κ-frw noncommutative spacetimes Paolo Aschieri Università del Piemonte
More informationA category theoretic framework for noncommutative and nonassociative geo
A category theoretic framework for noncommutative and nonassociative geometry Joint work with A. Schenkel and R. J. Szabo [arxiv:1409.6331, arxiv:1507.02792, arxiv:1601.07353] CLAP Scotland 2016, Edinburgh
More informationSpacetime Quantum Geometry
Spacetime Quantum Geometry Peter Schupp Jacobs University Bremen 4th Scienceweb GCOE International Symposium Tohoku University 2012 Outline Spacetime quantum geometry Applying the principles of quantum
More informationTHE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS
THE NONCOMMUTATIVE TORUS The noncommutative torus as a twisted convolution An ordinary two-torus T 2 with coordinate functions given by where x 1, x 2 [0, 1]. U 1 = e 2πix 1, U 2 = e 2πix 2, (1) By Fourier
More information. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω. Friday April 1 ± ǁ
. α β γ δ ε ζ η θ ι κ λ μ Aμ ν(x) ξ ο π ρ ς σ τ υ φ χ ψ ω. Α Β Γ Δ Ε Ζ Η Θ Ι Κ Λ Μ Ν Ξ Ο Π Ρ Σ Τ Υ Φ Χ Ψ Ω Friday April 1 ± ǁ 1 Chapter 5. Photons: Covariant Theory 5.1. The classical fields 5.2. Covariant
More informationInteracting Membranes
Branes in D.S.B., J. Bedford, N Copland, L. Tadrowski and D. C. Thompson Queen Mary College University of London Branes in Outline 1 Introduction 2 3 Branes in 4 5 6 Branes in is the strong coupling limit
More informationUniversal Gauge Theory in Two Dimensions
Universal Gauge Theory in Two Dimensions Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis Based on: 1608.03250 with A. Deser - L. Jonke - T. Strobl 1607.00342 (JHEP) with A. Deser - L. Jonke - T. Strobl mainly this one 1604.03739
More informationLecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes
Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes José D. Edelstein University of Santiago de Compostela STRING THEORY Santiago de Compostela, March 6, 2013 José D. Edelstein (USC) Lecture 9: RR-sector and D-branes 6-mar-2013
More informationGravity theory on Poisson manifold with R-flux
Gravity theory on Poisson manifold with R-flux Hisayoshi MURAKI (University of Tsukuba) in collaboration with Tsuguhiko ASAKAWA (Maebashi Institute of Technology) Satoshi WATAMURA (Tohoku University) References
More informationChern-Simons Theory and Its Applications. The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee
Chern-Simons Theory and Its Applications The 10 th Summer Institute for Theoretical Physics Ki-Myeong Lee Maxwell Theory Maxwell Theory: Gauge Transformation and Invariance Gauss Law Charge Degrees of
More informationTowards new non-geometric backgrounds
Towards new non-geometric backgrounds Erik Plauschinn University of Padova Ringberg 30.07.204 this talk is based on... This talk is based on T-duality revisited [arxiv:30.494], and on some work in progress
More informationCollective T-duality transformations and non-geometric spaces
Collective T-duality transformations and non-geometric spaces Erik Plauschinn LMU Munich ESI Vienna 09.12.2015 based on... This talk is based on :: T-duality revisited On T-duality transformations for
More informationNonassociative geometry and twist deformations in non-geometric string theory arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 28 Feb 2014
Nonassociative geometry and twist deformations in non-geometric string theory arxiv:1402.7306v1 [hep-th] 28 Feb 2014 Dionysios ylonas, Peter Schupp and Richard J. Szabo Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh,
More informationDouble Field Theory Double Fun?
Double Field Theory Double Fun? Falk Haßler based on..., 1410.6374, 1502.02428, 1509.04176,... University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill City University of New York March 3, 2016 The big picture Phenomenology
More informationTwistor Strings, Gauge Theory and Gravity. Abou Zeid, Hull and Mason hep-th/
Twistor Strings, Gauge Theory and Gravity Abou Zeid, Hull and Mason hep-th/0606272 Amplitudes for YM, Gravity have elegant twistor space structure: Twistor Geometry Amplitudes for YM, Gravity have elegant
More informationSingular Monopoles and Instantons on Curved Backgrounds
Singular Monopoles and Instantons on Curved Backgrounds Sergey Cherkis (Berkeley, Stanford, TCD) C k U(n) U(n) U(n) Odense 2 November 2010 Outline: Classical Solutions & their Charges Relations between
More informationDouble Field Theory on Group Manifolds in a Nutshell
in a Nutshell Ralph Blumenhagen Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich E-mail: blumenha@mpp.mpg.de Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Arnold-Sommerfeld-Center for Theoretical Physics, Munich E-mail:
More informationA Landscape of Field Theories
A Landscape of Field Theories Travis Maxfield Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago October 30, 2015 Based on arxiv: 1511.xxxxx w/ D. Robbins and S. Sethi Summary Despite the recent proliferation
More informationOn Flux Quantization in F-Theory
On Flux Quantization in F-Theory Raffaele Savelli MPI - Munich Bad Honnef, March 2011 Based on work with A. Collinucci, arxiv: 1011.6388 Motivations Motivations The recent attempts to find UV-completions
More informationDynamics of branes in DFT
Dynamics of branes in DFT Edvard Musaev Moscow Inst of Physics and Technology based on works with Eric Bergshoeff, Chris Blair, Axel Kleinschmidt, Fabio Riccioni Dualities Corfu, 2018 Web of (some) branes
More informationarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 29 Mar 2018
Higher Quantum Geometry and Non-Geometric String Theory arxiv:1803.08861v2 [hep-th] 29 Mar 2018 Department of Mathematics, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Maxwell Institute for Mathematical
More informationM2-brane Models. Christian Sämann. School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh String Theory Seminar, University of Adelaide, 10.4.2013 Based on: Basu-Harvey Bagger-Lambert, Gustavsson, ABJM my own work
More informationU-dual branes and non-geometric string backgrounds
U-dual branes and non-geometric string backgrounds Athanasios Chatzistavrakidis Institut für heoretische Physik, Leibniz Universität Hannover arxiv:1309.2653 With Fridrik F Gautason, George Moutsopoulos
More informationLecture 8: 1-loop closed string vacuum amplitude
Lecture 8: 1-loop closed string vacuum amplitude José D. Edelstein University of Santiago de Compostela STRING THEORY Santiago de Compostela, March 5, 2013 José D. Edelstein (USC) Lecture 8: 1-loop vacuum
More informationExtended Space for. Falk Hassler. bases on. arxiv: and in collaboration with. Pascal du Bosque and Dieter Lüst
Extended Space for (half) Maximally Supersymmetric Theories Falk Hassler bases on arxiv: 1611.07978 and 1705.09304 in collaboration with Pascal du Bosque and Dieter Lüst University of North Carolina at
More informationIntroduction to Modern Quantum Field Theory
Department of Mathematics University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, TX USA Febuary, 2016 Recall Einstein s famous equation, E 2 = (Mc 2 ) 2 + (c p) 2, where c is the speed of light, M is the classical
More informationDouble Field Theory at SL(2) angles
Double Field Theory at SL(2) angles Adolfo Guarino Université Libre de Bruxelles Iberian Strings 207 January 7th, Lisbon Based on arxiv:62.05230 & arxiv:604.08602 Duality covariant approaches to strings
More informationSome applications of light-cone superspace
Some applications of light-cone superspace Stefano Kovacs (Trinity College Dublin & Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies) Strings and Strong Interactions LNF, 19/09/2008 N =4 supersymmetric Yang Mills
More informationElements of Topological M-Theory
Elements of Topological M-Theory (with R. Dijkgraaf, S. Gukov, C. Vafa) Andrew Neitzke March 2005 Preface The topological string on a Calabi-Yau threefold X is (loosely speaking) an integrable spine of
More informationSnyder noncommutative space-time from two-time physics
arxiv:hep-th/0408193v1 25 Aug 2004 Snyder noncommutative space-time from two-time physics Juan M. Romero and Adolfo Zamora Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Apartado
More informationOn the curious spectrum of duality-invariant higher-derivative gravitational field theories
On the curious spectrum of duality-invariant higher-derivative gravitational field theories VIII Workshop on String Field Theory and Related Aspects ICTP-SAIFR 31 May 2016 Barton Zwiebach, MIT Introduction
More informationM-theory and extended geometry
M-theory and extended geometry D.S.B., Chris Blair, Martin Cederwall, Axel Kleinschmidt, Hadi & Mahdi Godazgar, Kanghoon Lee, Emanuel Malek, Edvard Musaev, Malcolm Perry, Felix Rudolph, Daniel Thompson,
More informationTwistors, amplitudes and gravity
Twistors, amplitudes and gravity From twistor strings to quantum gravity? L.J.Mason The Mathematical Institute, Oxford lmason@maths.ox.ac.uk LQG, Zakopane 4/3/2010 Based on JHEP10(2005)009 (hep-th/0507269),
More informationQuantization of the open string on exact plane waves and non-commutative wave fronts
Quantization of the open string on exact plane waves and non-commutative wave fronts F. Ruiz Ruiz (UCM Madrid) Miami 2007, December 13-18 arxiv:0711.2991 [hep-th], with G. Horcajada Motivation On-going
More informationarxiv: v3 [math-ph] 25 Oct 2018
September 2017 MPP-2017-209 LMU-ASC 57/17 Constructions of L algebras and their field theory realizations arxiv:1709.10004v3 [math-ph] 25 Oct 2018 Olaf Hohm 1, Vladislav Kupriyanov 2,3, Dieter Lüst 2,4,
More informationNewton s Second Law in a Noncommutative Space
Newton s Second Law in a Noncommutative Space Juan M. Romero, J.A. Santiago and J. David Vergara Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, U.N.A.M., Apdo. Postal 70-543, México D.F., México sanpedro, santiago,
More informationRelating DFT to N=2 gauged supergravity
Relating DFT to N=2 gauged supergravity Erik Plauschinn LMU Munich Chengdu 29.07.2016 based on... This talk is based on :: Relating double field theory to the scalar potential of N=2 gauged supergravity
More informationLorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 230A, Spring 2007, Hitoshi Murayama
Lorentz-covariant spectrum of single-particle states and their field theory Physics 30A, Spring 007, Hitoshi Murayama 1 Poincaré Symmetry In order to understand the number of degrees of freedom we need
More informationHalf BPS solutions in type IIB and M-theory
Half BPS solutions in type IIB and M-theory Based on work done in collaboration with Eric D Hoker, John Estes, Darya Krym (UCLA) and Paul Sorba (Annecy) E.D'Hoker, J.Estes and M.G., Exact half-bps type
More informationInstantons in string theory via F-theory
Instantons in string theory via F-theory Andrés Collinucci ASC, LMU, Munich Padova, May 12, 2010 arxiv:1002.1894 in collaboration with R. Blumenhagen and B. Jurke Outline 1. Intro: From string theory to
More informationSpectrum of Holographic Wilson Loops
Spectrum of Holographic Wilson Loops Leopoldo Pando Zayas University of Michigan Continuous Advances in QCD 2011 University of Minnesota Based on arxiv:1101.5145 Alberto Faraggi and LPZ Work in Progress,
More informationS-Duality for D3-Brane in NS-NS and R-R Backgrounds
S-Duality for D3-Brane in NS-NS and R-R Backgrounds Chen-Te Ma Collaborator: Pei-Ming Ho National Taiwan University arxiv:1311.3393 [hep-th] January 17, 2014 Reference P. -M. Ho and Y. Matsuo, M5 from
More informationSpin foam vertex and loop gravity
Spin foam vertex and loop gravity J Engle, R Pereira and C Rovelli Centre de Physique Théorique CNRS Case 907, Université de la Méditerranée, F-13288 Marseille, EU Roberto Pereira, Loops 07 Morelia 25-30
More informationSUPERSTRING REALIZATIONS OF SUPERGRAVITY IN TEN AND LOWER DIMENSIONS. John H. Schwarz. Dedicated to the memory of Joël Scherk
SUPERSTRING REALIZATIONS OF SUPERGRAVITY IN TEN AND LOWER DIMENSIONS John H. Schwarz Dedicated to the memory of Joël Scherk SOME FAMOUS SCHERK PAPERS Dual Models For Nonhadrons J. Scherk, J. H. Schwarz
More informationOpen String Wavefunctions in Flux Compactifications. Fernando Marchesano
Open String Wavefunctions in Flux Compactifications Fernando Marchesano Open String Wavefunctions in Flux Compactifications Fernando Marchesano In collaboration with Pablo G. Cámara Motivation Two popular
More information3-Cocycles, Non-Associative Star-Products and the Magnetic Paradigm of R-Flux String Vacua
LMU-ASC 64/13 MPP-2013-255 3-Cocycles, Non-Associative Star-Products and the Magnetic Paradigm of R-Flux String Vacua Ioannis Bakas 1 and Dieter Lüst 2,3 arxiv:1309.3172v3 [hep-th] 5 Dec 2013 1 Department
More informationYet Another Alternative to Compactification
Okayama Institute for Quantum Physics: June 26, 2009 Yet Another Alternative to Compactification Heterotic five-branes explain why three generations in Nature arxiv: 0905.2185 [hep-th] Tetsuji KIMURA (KEK)
More information1 Canonical quantization conformal gauge
Contents 1 Canonical quantization conformal gauge 1.1 Free field space of states............................... 1. Constraints..................................... 3 1..1 VIRASORO ALGEBRA...........................
More informationApproaches to Quantum Gravity A conceptual overview
Approaches to Quantum Gravity A conceptual overview Robert Oeckl Instituto de Matemáticas UNAM, Morelia Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica UNAM, Morelia 14 February 2008 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Different
More informationLQG, the signature-changing Poincaré algebra and spectral dimension
LQG, the signature-changing Poincaré algebra and spectral dimension Tomasz Trześniewski Institute for Theoretical Physics, Wrocław University, Poland / Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Poland
More informationNew Phenomena in 2d String Theory
New Phenomena in 2d String Theory Nathan Seiberg Rutgers 2005 N.S. hep-th/0502156 J.L. Davis, F. Larsen, N.S. hep-th/0505081, and to appear J. Maldacena, N.S. hep-th/0506141 1 Low Dimensional String Theories
More information4d N=2 as 6d N=(2,0) compactified on C
Yesterday Basics of 6d N=(2,0) theory. S-duality of 4d N=4. Today 4d N=2 as 6d N=(2,0) compactified on C Tomorrow Relation with 2d CFT Yesterday s talk s summary 6d N=(2,0) theory comes in types G= A,D,E
More informationarxiv:hep-th/ v2 14 Oct 1997
T-duality and HKT manifolds arxiv:hep-th/9709048v2 14 Oct 1997 A. Opfermann Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EW, UK February
More informationSpinning strings and QED
Spinning strings and QED James Edwards Oxford Particles and Fields Seminar January 2015 Based on arxiv:1409.4948 [hep-th] and arxiv:1410.3288 [hep-th] Outline Introduction Various relationships between
More informationContact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED
Contact interactions in string theory and a reformulation of QED James Edwards QFT Seminar November 2014 Based on arxiv:1409.4948 [hep-th] and arxiv:1410.3288 [hep-th] Outline Introduction Worldline formalism
More informationNoncommutative geometry, quantum symmetries and quantum gravity II
Noncommutative geometry, quantum symmetries and quantum gravity II 4-7 July 2016, Wroclaw, Poland XXXVII Max Born Symposium & 2016 WG3 Meeting of COST Action MP1405 Cartan s structure equations and Levi-Civita
More informationYet Another Alternative to Compactification by Heterotic Five-branes
The University of Tokyo, Hongo: October 26, 2009 Yet Another Alternative to Compactification by Heterotic Five-branes arxiv: 0905.285 [hep-th] Tetsuji KIMURA (KEK) Shun ya Mizoguchi (KEK, SOKENDAI) Introduction
More informationTwistor strings for N =8. supergravity
Twistor strings for N =8 supergravity David Skinner - IAS & Cambridge Amplitudes 2013 - MPI Ringberg Twistor space is CP 3 CP 3, described by co-ords R 3,1 Z a rz a X Y y x CP 1 in twistor space Point
More informationIntroduction to string theory 2 - Quantization
Remigiusz Durka Institute of Theoretical Physics Wroclaw / 34 Table of content Introduction to Quantization Classical String Quantum String 2 / 34 Classical Theory In the classical mechanics one has dynamical
More informationNoncommutative Geometry for Quantum Spacetime
Noncommutative Geometry for Quantum Spacetime The view from below Fedele Lizzi Università di Napoli Federico II Institut de Ciencies del Cosmo, Barcelona SIGrav, Alessandria 2014 I think we would all agree
More informationAn extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model
An extended standard model and its Higgs geometry from the matrix model Jochen Zahn Universität Wien based on arxiv:1401.2020 joint work with Harold Steinacker Bayrischzell, May 2014 Motivation The IKKT
More informationSymmetry and Geometry in String Theory
Symmetry and Geometry in String Theory Symmetry and Extra Dimensions String/M Theory Rich theory, novel duality symmetries and exotic structures Supergravity limit - misses stringy features Infinite set
More informationA kappa deformed Clifford Algebra, Hopf Algebras and Quantum Gravity
A kappa deformed Clifford Algebra, Hopf Algebras and Quantum Gravity Carlos Castro Perelman June 2015 Universidad Tecnica Particular de Loja, San Cayetano Alto, Loja, 1101608 Ecuador Center for Theoretical
More informationString Geometry Beyond the Torus
String Geometry Beyond the Torus Falk Haßler based on arxiv:1410.6374 with Ralph Blumenhagen and Dieter Lüst Arnold Sommerfeld Center LMU Munich October 25, 2014 The big picture Phenomenology SUGRA target
More informationClassical-quantum Correspondence and Wave Packet Solutions of the Dirac Equation in a Curved Spacetime
Classical-quantum Correspondence and Wave Packet Solutions of the Dirac Equation in a Curved Spacetime Mayeul Arminjon 1,2 and Frank Reifler 3 1 CNRS (Section of Theoretical Physics) 2 Lab. Soils, Solids,
More informationABJM Baryon Stability at Finite t Hooft Coupling
ABJM Baryon Stability at Finite t Hooft Coupling Yolanda Lozano (U. Oviedo) Santiago de Compostela, October 2011 - Motivation: Study the stability of non-singlet baryon vertex-like configurations in ABJM
More informationHeterotic Torsional Backgrounds, from Supergravity to CFT
Heterotic Torsional Backgrounds, from Supergravity to CFT IAP, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Eurostrings@Madrid, June 2010 L.Carlevaro, D.I. and M. Petropoulos, arxiv:0812.3391 L.Carlevaro and D.I.,
More informationPath Integral for Spin
Path Integral for Spin Altland-Simons have a good discussion in 3.3 Applications of the Feynman Path Integral to the quantization of spin, which is defined by the commutation relations [Ŝj, Ŝk = iɛ jk
More informationGeometry and Physics. Amer Iqbal. March 4, 2010
March 4, 2010 Many uses of Mathematics in Physics The language of the physical world is mathematics. Quantitative understanding of the world around us requires the precise language of mathematics. Symmetries
More informationInteracting non-bps black holes
Interacting non-bps black holes Guillaume Bossard CPhT, Ecole Polytechnique Istanbul, August 2011 Outline Time-like Kaluza Klein reduction From solvable algebras to solvable systems Two-centre interacting
More informationQuantum Fields in Curved Spacetime
Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime Lecture 3 Finn Larsen Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics Yerevan, August 22, 2016. Recap AdS 3 is an instructive application of quantum fields in curved space. The
More informationQuantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams
Quantum Field Theory I Examination questions will be composed from those below and from questions in the textbook and previous exams III. Quantization of constrained systems and Maxwell s theory 1. The
More informationTwist deformation quantization, gravity and Einstein spaces. Paolo Aschieri U.Piemonte Orientale, Alessandria
Bayrischzell 15.5.2010 Noncommutativity and Physics: Spacetime Quantum Geometry Twist deformation quantization, gravity and Einstein spaces Paolo Aschieri U.Piemonte Orientale, Alessandria I recall the
More informationInterpolating geometries, fivebranes and the Klebanov-Strassler theory
Interpolating geometries, fivebranes and the Klebanov-Strassler theory Dario Martelli King s College, London Based on: [Maldacena,DM] JHEP 1001:104,2010, [Gaillard,DM,Núñez,Papadimitriou] to appear Universitá
More informationTopological reduction of supersymmetric gauge theories and S-duality
Topological reduction of supersymmetric gauge theories and S-duality Anton Kapustin California Institute of Technology Topological reduction of supersymmetric gauge theories and S-duality p. 1/2 Outline
More informationSupergeometry and unified picture of fluxes
Supergeometry and unified picture of fluxes Satoshi Watamura (Tohoku U.) based on the collaboration with T. Asakawa, N. Ikeda, Y. Kaneko, T. Kaneko, M.A. Heller, U. Carow-Watamura, H.Muraki. Ref.[JHEP02
More informationNonspherical Giant Gravitons and Matrix Theory
NSF-ITP-0-59 ITEP-TH-38/0 Nonspherical Giant Gravitons and Matrix Theory Andrei Mikhailov 1 Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 E-mail: andrei@kitp.ucsb.edu
More informationAmplitudes beyond four-dimensions
Amplitudes beyond four-dimensions HKIAS-Nov-204 Why? why? QFT exists in D 4 Questions rephrased in terms of physical observables Allow for application of consistency conditions: Structures based on Unitarity
More informationExercise 1 Classical Bosonic String
Exercise 1 Classical Bosonic String 1. The Relativistic Particle The action describing a free relativistic point particle of mass m moving in a D- dimensional Minkowski spacetime is described by ) 1 S
More information