Littlewood Richardson polynomials
|
|
- Cathleen Simon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Littlewood Richardson polynomials Alexander Molev University of Sydney
2 A diagram (or partition) is a sequence λ = (λ 1,..., λ n ) of integers λ i such that λ 1 λ n 0, depicted as an array of unit boxes.
3 A diagram (or partition) is a sequence λ = (λ 1,..., λ n ) of integers λ i such that λ 1 λ n 0, depicted as an array of unit boxes. Example. The diagram λ = (5, 5, 3) is
4 A diagram (or partition) is a sequence λ = (λ 1,..., λ n ) of integers λ i such that λ 1 λ n 0, depicted as an array of unit boxes. Example. The diagram λ = (5, 5, 3) is The number of boxes is the weight of the diagram, denoted λ. The number of nonzero rows is its length, denoted l(λ).
5 A diagram (or partition) is a sequence λ = (λ 1,..., λ n ) of integers λ i such that λ 1 λ n 0, depicted as an array of unit boxes. Example. The diagram λ = (5, 5, 3) is λ = 13 l(λ) = 3 The number of boxes is the weight of the diagram, denoted λ. The number of nonzero rows is its length, denoted l(λ).
6 Littlewood Richardson coefficients c ν λµ
7 Littlewood Richardson coefficients c ν λµ Let l(λ) n and let V λ denote the irreducible gl n -module with the highest weight λ.
8 Littlewood Richardson coefficients c ν λµ Let l(λ) n and let V λ denote the irreducible gl n -module with the highest weight λ. Then V λ V µ L = cλµ ν V ν. ν Here l(λ), l(µ), l(ν) n.
9 Let λ = k and let χ λ denote the corresponding irreducible character of the symmetric group S k.
10 Let λ = k and let χ λ denote the corresponding irreducible character of the symmetric group S k. Then Ind S k+l S k S l ( χ λ χ µ) = ν c ν λµ χν. Here λ = k, µ = l, ν = k + l.
11 Let λ = k and let χ λ denote the corresponding irreducible character of the symmetric group S k. Then Ind S k+l S k S l ( χ λ χ µ) = ν c ν λµ χν. Here λ = k, µ = l, ν = k + l. In particular, c ν λµ 0 = ν = λ + µ.
12 Let n and N be nonnegative integers with n N and let Gr n,n denote the Grassmannian of the n-dimensional vector subspaces of C N. The cohomology ring H (Gr n,n ) has a basis of the Schubert classes σ λ parameterized by all diagrams λ contained in the n m rectangle, m = N n.
13 Let n and N be nonnegative integers with n N and let Gr n,n denote the Grassmannian of the n-dimensional vector subspaces of C N. The cohomology ring H (Gr n,n ) has a basis of the Schubert classes σ λ parameterized by all diagrams λ contained in the n m rectangle, m = N n. We have σ λ σ µ = ν c ν λµ σ ν. Here λ, µ, ν are contained in the n m rectangle.
14 Let x = (x 1, x 2,... ) be an infinite set of variables.
15 Let x = (x 1, x 2,... ) be an infinite set of variables. Given any partition λ = (λ 1,..., λ n ), define the corresponding monomial symmetric function by m λ (x) = σ x λ 1 σ(1) x λ 2 σ(2)... x λn σ(n), summed over permutations σ of the x i which give distinct monomials.
16 Let x = (x 1, x 2,... ) be an infinite set of variables. Given any partition λ = (λ 1,..., λ n ), define the corresponding monomial symmetric function by m λ (x) = σ x λ 1 σ(1) x λ 2 σ(2)... x λn σ(n), summed over permutations σ of the x i which give distinct monomials. The algebra of symmetric functions Λ is defined as the Q-span of all monomial symmetric functions.
17 Examples: power sums symmetric functions p k (x) = m (k) (x) = i=1 x k i,
18 Examples: power sums symmetric functions p k (x) = m (k) (x) = i=1 x k i, elementary symmetric functions e k (x) = m (1 k ) (x) = x i1... x ik, i 1 > >i k 1
19 Examples: power sums symmetric functions p k (x) = m (k) (x) = i=1 x k i, elementary symmetric functions e k (x) = m (1 k ) (x) = x i1... x ik, i 1 > >i k 1 complete symmetric functions h k (x) = m λ (x) = x i1... x ik. λ =k i 1 i k 1
20 Schur functions
21 Schur functions Given a diagram λ, a reverse λ-tableau T is obtained by filling in the boxes of λ with the numbers 1, 2,... in such a way that the entries weakly decrease along the rows and strictly decrease down the columns. If α = (i, j) is a box of λ we let T (α) = T (i, j) denote the entry of T in the box α.
22 Schur functions Given a diagram λ, a reverse λ-tableau T is obtained by filling in the boxes of λ with the numbers 1, 2,... in such a way that the entries weakly decrease along the rows and strictly decrease down the columns. If α = (i, j) is a box of λ we let T (α) = T (i, j) denote the entry of T in the box α. Example. A reverse λ-tableau for λ = (5, 5, 3):
23 The Schur function s λ (x) corresponding to λ is defined by s λ (x) = T x T (α), α λ summed over the reverse λ-tableaux T.
24 The Schur function s λ (x) corresponding to λ is defined by s λ (x) = T x T (α), α λ summed over the reverse λ-tableaux T. Example. For λ = (2, 1) the reverse tableaux are i j with i j and i > k. k
25 The Schur function s λ (x) corresponding to λ is defined by s λ (x) = T x T (α), α λ summed over the reverse λ-tableaux T. Example. For λ = (2, 1) the reverse tableaux are i j with i j and i > k. k Hence s (2,1) (x) = x i x j x k. i j, i>k
26 Note also hk (x) = s(k ) (x), ek (x) = s(1k ) (x).
27 Note also h k (x) = s (k) (x), e k (x) = s (1 k ) (x). Tableaux i 1 i 2 i 1 i 2 i k. i k
28 Note also h k (x) = s (k) (x), e k (x) = s (1 k ) (x). Tableaux i 1 i 2 i 1 i 2 i k. i k Hence s (k) (x) = x i1... x ik, s (1 k ) (x) = i 1 i k 1 i 1 > >i k 1 x i1... x ik.
29 The Schur functions s λ (x) parameterized by all diagrams form a basis of the algebra of symmetric functions Λ.
30 The Schur functions s λ (x) parameterized by all diagrams form a basis of the algebra of symmetric functions Λ. The relation s λ (x) s µ (x) = ν c ν λµ s ν(x) defines the Littlewood Richardson coefficients c ν λµ.
31 History: D. E. Littlewood and A. R. Richardson (1934), (general formulation, a proof in the case l(µ) 2), G. de B. Robinson (1938, proof contains gaps).
32 History: D. E. Littlewood and A. R. Richardson (1934), (general formulation, a proof in the case l(µ) 2), G. de B. Robinson (1938, proof contains gaps). Complete proofs: G. P. Thomas (1974 PhD thesis, 1978 paper), M. P. Schützenberger (1977).
33 History: D. E. Littlewood and A. R. Richardson (1934), (general formulation, a proof in the case l(µ) 2), G. de B. Robinson (1938, proof contains gaps). Complete proofs: G. P. Thomas (1974 PhD thesis, 1978 paper), M. P. Schützenberger (1977). Now: A couple of dozens of versions of the LR rule, cλµ ν counts tableaux, trees, hives, honeycombs, cartons, puzzles,....
34 Knutson Tao Woodward puzzles Suppose that λ, µ, ν are contained in n m rectangle. Write each partition in the binary code of length n + m.
35 Knutson Tao Woodward puzzles Suppose that λ, µ, ν are contained in n m rectangle. Write each partition in the binary code of length n + m. Example. The diagram λ = (5, 5, 3) inside 4 7 rectangle is represented as follows:
36 Knutson Tao Woodward puzzles Suppose that λ, µ, ν are contained in n m rectangle. Write each partition in the binary code of length n + m. Example. The diagram λ = (5, 5, 3) inside 4 7 rectangle is represented as follows:
37 Write the sequences corresponding to λ, µ, ν around the border of an equilateral triangle of side length n + m as indicated:
38 Write the sequences corresponding to λ, µ, ν around the border of an equilateral triangle of side length n + m as indicated: λ µ ν
39 Write the sequences corresponding to λ, µ, ν around the border of an equilateral triangle of side length n + m as indicated: λ µ ν Theorem [KTW 03]. The Littlewood Richardson coefficient c ν λµ equals the number of triangular puzzles which can be obtained with the use of the following set of unit puzzle pieces.
40 Puzzle pieces
41 Example. Calculation of cλµ ν, λ = (2), µ = (1), ν = (2, 1).
42 Example. Calculation of cλµ ν, λ = (2), µ = (1), ν = (2, 1). Take n = m = 2 so that
43 Example. Calculation of cλµ ν, λ = (2), µ = (1), ν = (2, 1). Take n = m = 2 so that λ
44 Example. Calculation of cλµ ν, λ = (2), µ = (1), ν = (2, 1). Take n = m = 2 so that λ µ
45 Example. Calculation of cλµ ν, λ = (2), µ = (1), ν = (2, 1). Take n = m = 2 so that λ µ ν
46
47
48
49
50
51 c 1 0 λµ ν =
52 A tableau version of the LR rule Let R denote a sequence of diagrams µ = ρ (0) ρ (1) ρ (l 1) ρ (l) = ν, ρ σ means σ is obtained from ρ by adding one box.
53 A tableau version of the LR rule Let R denote a sequence of diagrams µ = ρ (0) ρ (1) ρ (l 1) ρ (l) = ν, ρ σ means σ is obtained from ρ by adding one box. Let r i denote the row number of the box added to ρ (i 1). The sequence r 1 r 2... r l is the Yamanouchi symbol of R.
54 Example. Let R : (3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (3, 3, 1) (4, 3, 1)
55 Example. Let R : (3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (3, 3, 1) (4, 3, 1) or, with diagrams,
56 Example. Let R : (3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (3, 3, 1) (4, 3, 1) or, with diagrams, the Yamanouchi symbol is
57 The column word of a tableau T is the sequence of all entries of T written in the column order: by reading the entries by columns from left to right and from bottom to top in each column.
58 The column word of a tableau T is the sequence of all entries of T written in the column order: by reading the entries by columns from left to right and from bottom to top in each column. Example. A reverse λ-tableau for λ = (5, 5, 3):
59 The column word of a tableau T is the sequence of all entries of T written in the column order: by reading the entries by columns from left to right and from bottom to top in each column. Example. A reverse λ-tableau for λ = (5, 5, 3): Its column word is
60 Let λ and ν be two diagrams.
61 Let λ and ν be two diagrams. A reverse λ-tableau T is called ν-bounded if the entries in the top row do not exceed the respective column lengths of ν: T (1, 1) ν 1, T (1, 2) ν 2,....
62 Let λ and ν be two diagrams. A reverse λ-tableau T is called ν-bounded if the entries in the top row do not exceed the respective column lengths of ν: T (1, 1) ν 1, T (1, 2) ν 2,.... Such tableaux exist only if λ ν.
63 Let λ and ν be two diagrams. A reverse λ-tableau T is called ν-bounded if the entries in the top row do not exceed the respective column lengths of ν: T (1, 1) ν 1, T (1, 2) ν 2,.... Such tableaux exist only if λ ν.
64 Let λ and ν be two diagrams. A reverse λ-tableau T is called ν-bounded if the entries in the top row do not exceed the respective column lengths of ν: T (1, 1) ν 1, T (1, 2) ν 2,.... Such tableaux exist only if λ ν. Maximal entries:
65 Theorem. The Littlewood Richardson coefficient c ν λµ equals the number of common elements in the two sets: { } column words of the ν-bounded reverse λ-tableaux and { } Yamanouchi symbols of the sequences from µ to ν.
66 Theorem. The Littlewood Richardson coefficient c ν λµ equals the number of common elements in the two sets: { } column words of the ν-bounded reverse λ-tableaux and { } Yamanouchi symbols of the sequences from µ to ν. Remarks. This is a particular case of a more general theorem.
67 Theorem. The Littlewood Richardson coefficient c ν λµ equals the number of common elements in the two sets: { } column words of the ν-bounded reverse λ-tableaux and { } Yamanouchi symbols of the sequences from µ to ν. Remarks. This is a particular case of a more general theorem. The theorem is equivalent to the puzzle rule (T. Tao).
68 Example. Calculation of cλµ ν, λ = µ = (2, 1), ν = (3, 2, 1).
69 Example. Calculation of cλµ ν, λ = µ = (2, 1), ν = (3, 2, 1). Here ν 1 = 3, ν 2 = 2, ν 3 = 1. The ν-bounded λ-tableaux are
70 Example. Calculation of cλµ ν, λ = µ = (2, 1), ν = (3, 2, 1). Here ν 1 = 3, ν 2 = 2, ν 3 = 1. The ν-bounded λ-tableaux are The set of column words is { } 2 3 2, 1 3 2, 2 3 1, 1 3 1, 1 2 2,
71 The sequences from (2, 1) to (3, 2, 1): (2, 1) (3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (3, 1) (3, 1, 1) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 2) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 2) (2, 2, 1) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 1, 1) (3, 1, 1) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 1, 1) (2, 2, 1) (3, 2, 1)
72 The sequences from (2, 1) to (3, 2, 1): (2, 1) (3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (3, 1) (3, 1, 1) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 2) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 2) (2, 2, 1) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 1, 1) (3, 1, 1) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 1, 1) (2, 2, 1) (3, 2, 1) The set of the Yamanouchi symbols is { } 1 2 3, 1 3 2, 2 1 3, 2 3 1, 3 1 2,
73 The sequences from (2, 1) to (3, 2, 1): (2, 1) (3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (3, 1) (3, 1, 1) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 2) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 2) (2, 2, 1) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 1, 1) (3, 1, 1) (3, 2, 1) (2, 1) (2, 1, 1) (2, 2, 1) (3, 2, 1) The set of the Yamanouchi symbols is { } 1 2 3, 1 3 2, 2 1 3, 2 3 1, 3 1 2, Hence c ν λµ = 2.
74 Double symmetric functions The elements of the algebra of symmetric functions Λ can be viewed as sequences of symmetric polynomials: i=1 x k i x k 1, x k 1 + x k 2,..., x k 1 + x k x k n,...
75 Double symmetric functions The elements of the algebra of symmetric functions Λ can be viewed as sequences of symmetric polynomials: i=1 x k i x k 1, x k 1 + x k 2,..., x k 1 + x k x k n,... The polynomials in such a sequence are compatible with the evaluation homomorphisms ϕ n : P(x 1,..., x n ) P(x 1,..., x n 1, 0).
76 Let a = (a i ), i Z, be a sequence of variables. Denote by Λ n the ring of symmetric polynomials in x 1,..., x n with coefficients in Q[a].
77 Let a = (a i ), i Z, be a sequence of variables. Denote by Λ n the ring of symmetric polynomials in x 1,..., x n with coefficients in Q[a]. Consider the sequences of symmetric polynomials compatible with the evaluation homomorphisms ϕ n : Λ n Λ n 1, P(x 1,..., x n ) P(x 1,..., x n 1, a n ).
78 Let a = (a i ), i Z, be a sequence of variables. Denote by Λ n the ring of symmetric polynomials in x 1,..., x n with coefficients in Q[a]. Consider the sequences of symmetric polynomials compatible with the evaluation homomorphisms ϕ n : Λ n Λ n 1, P(x 1,..., x n ) P(x 1,..., x n 1, a n ). The ring Λ a of double symmetric functions is formed by such sequences of polynomials. The sequences can also be regarded as formal series.
79 Examples. We have ϕ n : n i=1 (x k i n 1 ai k ) i=1 (x k i a k i ) hence p k (x a) = i=1 (x k i a k i ) Λ a, the double power sums symmetric function.
80 Examples. We have ϕ n : n i=1 (x k i n 1 ai k ) i=1 (x k i a k i ) hence p k (x a) = i=1 (x k i a k i ) Λ a, the double power sums symmetric function. Λ a is the ring of polynomials in p 1 (x a), p 2 (x a),.... with coefficients in Q[a].
81 Examples. We have ϕ n : n i=1 (x k i n 1 ai k ) i=1 (x k i a k i ) hence p k (x a) = i=1 (x k i a k i ) Λ a, the double power sums symmetric function. Λ a is the ring of polynomials in p 1 (x a), p 2 (x a),.... with coefficients in Q[a]. Note that Λ 0 = Λ.
82 Double Schur functions For any diagram λ define the double Schur function by s λ (x a) = T (x T (α) a T (α) c(α) ), α λ summed over the reverse λ-tableaux T, c(α) = j i is the content of the box α = (i, j).
83 Double Schur functions For any diagram λ define the double Schur function by s λ (x a) = T (x T (α) a T (α) c(α) ), α λ summed over the reverse λ-tableaux T, c(α) = j i is the content of the box α = (i, j). The double Schur functions form a basis of Λ a over Q[a].
84 Example. For λ = (2, 1) the reverse tableaux are i j with i j and i > k k
85 Example. For λ = (2, 1) the reverse tableaux are i j with i j and i > k k Hence s (2,1) (x a) = (x i a i )(x j a j 1 )(x k a k+1 ). i j, i>k
86 Set h k (x a) = s (k) (x a), e k (x a) = s (1 k )(x a).
87 Set h k (x a) = s (k) (x a), e k (x a) = s (1 k )(x a). Tableaux i 1 i 2 i 1 i 2 i k. i k
88 Set h k (x a) = s (k) (x a), e k (x a) = s (1 k )(x a). Tableaux i 1 i 2 i 1 i 2 i k. i k Double complete and elementary symmetric functions: h k (x a) = (x i1 a i1 )... (x ik a ik k+1), i 1 i k e k (x a) = (x i1 a i1 )... (x ik a ik +k 1). i 1 > >i k
89 Define the Littlewood Richardson polynomials cλµ ν (a) Q[a] by s λ (x a) s µ (x a) = ν c ν λµ (a) s ν(x a).
90 Define the Littlewood Richardson polynomials cλµ ν (a) Q[a] by s λ (x a) s µ (x a) = ν c ν λµ (a) s ν(x a). Properties. cλµ ν (a) 0 only if ν λ + µ.
91 Define the Littlewood Richardson polynomials cλµ ν (a) Q[a] by s λ (x a) s µ (x a) = ν c ν λµ (a) s ν(x a). Properties. cλµ ν (a) 0 only if ν λ + µ. cλµ ν (a) is homogeneous of degree λ + µ ν.
92 Define the Littlewood Richardson polynomials cλµ ν (a) Q[a] by s λ (x a) s µ (x a) = ν c ν λµ (a) s ν(x a). Properties. cλµ ν (a) 0 only if ν λ + µ. cλµ ν (a) is homogeneous of degree λ + µ ν. c ν λµ (a) = c ν λµ if λ + µ = ν or a = (0).
93 Define the Littlewood Richardson polynomials cλµ ν (a) Q[a] by s λ (x a) s µ (x a) = ν c ν λµ (a) s ν(x a). Properties. cλµ ν (a) 0 only if ν λ + µ. cλµ ν (a) is homogeneous of degree λ + µ ν. c ν λµ (a) = c ν λµ if λ + µ = ν or a = (0). c ν λµ (a) = c ν µλ (a).
94 Define the Littlewood Richardson polynomials cλµ ν (a) Q[a] by s λ (x a) s µ (x a) = ν c ν λµ (a) s ν(x a). Properties. cλµ ν (a) 0 only if ν λ + µ. cλµ ν (a) is homogeneous of degree λ + µ ν. c ν λµ (a) = c ν λµ if λ + µ = ν or a = (0). c ν λµ (a) = c ν µλ (a). cλµ ν (a) 0 only if λ ν and µ ν.
95 Calculation of c ν λµ (a) Given a sequence R from µ to ν with the Yamanouchi symbol r 1 r 2... r l, introduce the set T (λ, R) of barred reverse λ-tableaux T with entries from {1, 2,... } such that T contains entries r 1, r 2,..., r l listed in the column order.
96 Calculation of c ν λµ (a) Given a sequence R from µ to ν with the Yamanouchi symbol r 1 r 2... r l, introduce the set T (λ, R) of barred reverse λ-tableaux T with entries from {1, 2,... } such that T contains entries r 1, r 2,..., r l listed in the column order. We will distinguish these entries by barring each of them.
97 Calculation of c ν λµ (a) Given a sequence R from µ to ν with the Yamanouchi symbol r 1 r 2... r l, introduce the set T (λ, R) of barred reverse λ-tableaux T with entries from {1, 2,... } such that T contains entries r 1, r 2,..., r l listed in the column order. We will distinguish these entries by barring each of them. An element T T (λ, R) is a pair consisting of a reverse λ-tableau and a sequence of barred entries compatible with R.
98 Example. Let R be the sequence (3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (3, 3, 1) (4, 3, 1) so that the Yamanouchi symbol is
99 Example. Let R be the sequence (3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (3, 3, 1) (4, 3, 1) so that the Yamanouchi symbol is Let λ = (5, 5, 3). The barred λ-tableau belongs to T (λ, R).
100 Example. Let R be the sequence (3, 1) (3, 2) (3, 2, 1) (3, 3, 1) (4, 3, 1) so that the Yamanouchi symbol is Let λ = (5, 5, 3). The barred λ-tableau belongs to T (λ, R).
101 Given a sequence of diagrams R : µ = ρ (0) ρ (1) ρ (l 1) ρ (l) = ν, set ρ(α) = ρ (i) for any box α occupied by an unbarred entry of T, between r i and r i+1 in column order.
102 Given a sequence of diagrams R : µ = ρ (0) ρ (1) ρ (l 1) ρ (l) = ν, set ρ(α) = ρ (i) for any box α occupied by an unbarred entry of T, between r i and r i+1 in column order. The barred entries r 1, r 2,..., r l of T divide the tableau into regions marked by the elements of the sequence R : r 1 r 2 r l ρ (l) ρ (0) ρ (1)
103 Theorem (Kreiman & M. 07, independently). We have c ν λµ (a) = R T α λ T (α) unbarred ( a T (α) ρ(α)t (α) a T (α) c(α) ), summed over all sequences R from µ to ν and all ν-bounded reverse λ-tableaux T T (λ, R).
104 Theorem (Kreiman & M. 07, independently). We have c ν λµ (a) = R T α λ T (α) unbarred ( a T (α) ρ(α)t (α) a T (α) c(α) ), summed over all sequences R from µ to ν and all ν-bounded reverse λ-tableaux T T (λ, R). Moreover, in each factor ρ(α) T (α) > c(α).
105 Theorem (Kreiman & M. 07, independently). We have c ν λµ (a) = R T α λ T (α) unbarred ( a T (α) ρ(α)t (α) a T (α) c(α) ), summed over all sequences R from µ to ν and all ν-bounded reverse λ-tableaux T T (λ, R). Moreover, in each factor ρ(α) T (α) > c(α). Remarks. If ν = λ + µ then this is a version of the LR rule.
106 Theorem (Kreiman & M. 07, independently). We have c ν λµ (a) = R T α λ T (α) unbarred ( a T (α) ρ(α)t (α) a T (α) c(α) ), summed over all sequences R from µ to ν and all ν-bounded reverse λ-tableaux T T (λ, R). Moreover, in each factor ρ(α) T (α) > c(α). Remarks. If ν = λ + µ then this is a version of the LR rule. cλµ ν (a) is Graham-positive: it is a polynomial in the differences a i a j, i < j, with positive integer coefficients.
107 Example. Calculation of c ν λµ (a), λ = (2, 1), µ = (3, 1), ν = (4, 1, 1).
108 Example. Calculation of c ν λµ (a), λ = (2, 1), µ = (3, 1), ν = (4, 1, 1). Here ν 1 = 3, ν 2 = 1, ν 3 = 1, ν 4 = 1. The ν-bounded λ-tableaux
109 Example. Calculation of c ν λµ (a), λ = (2, 1), µ = (3, 1), ν = (4, 1, 1). Here ν 1 = 3, ν 2 = 1, ν 3 = 1, ν 4 = 1. The ν-bounded λ-tableaux There are two sequences R 1 : (3, 1) (4, 1) (4, 1, 1) and R 2 : (3, 1) (3, 1, 1) (4, 1, 1) with the respective Yamanouchi symbols 1 3 and 3 1.
110 T (λ, R 1 ) contains one barred tableau 3 1 with T (α) = 1, ρ(α) = (4, 1, 1), c(α) = 1, 1 contributing a T (α) ρ(α)t (α) a T (α) c(α) = a 3 a 0.
111 T (λ, R 1 ) contains one barred tableau 3 1 with T (α) = 1, ρ(α) = (4, 1, 1), c(α) = 1, 1 contributing a T (α) ρ(α)t (α) a T (α) c(α) = a 3 a 0. T (λ, R 2 ) contains two barred tableaux with contributions 3 1 a 2 a 2, a 1 a 3. 2
112 T (λ, R 1 ) contains one barred tableau 3 1 with T (α) = 1, ρ(α) = (4, 1, 1), c(α) = 1, 1 contributing a T (α) ρ(α)t (α) a T (α) c(α) = a 3 a 0. T (λ, R 2 ) contains two barred tableaux with contributions 3 1 a 2 a 2, a 1 a 3. 2 Hence c ν λµ (a) = a 3 a 0 + a 2 a 2 + a 1 a 3.
113 Example. For the product of the double Schur functions s (2) (x a) and s (2,1) (x a) we have s (2) (x a) s (2,1) (x a) = s (4,1) (x a) + s (3,2) (x a) + s (3,1,1) (x a) + s (2,2,1) (x a) + ( ) a 1 a 0 s(2,1,1) (x a) + ( ) a 1 a 2 s(2,2) (x a) + ( ) a 1 a 2 + a 2 a 0 s(3,1) (x a) + ( ) ( ) a 1 a 2 a 1 a 0 s(2,1) (x a).
114 Example. For the product of the double Schur functions s (2) (x a) and s (2,1) (x a) we have s (2) (x a) s (2,1) (x a) = s (4,1) (x a) + s (3,2) (x a) + s (3,1,1) (x a) + s (2,2,1) (x a) + ( ) a 1 a 0 s(2,1,1) (x a) + ( ) a 1 a 2 s(2,2) (x a) + ( ) a 1 a 2 + a 2 a 0 s(3,1) (x a) + ( ) ( ) a 1 a 2 a 1 a 0 s(2,1) (x a).
115 Example. For the product of the double Schur functions s (2) (x a) and s (2,1) (x a) we have s (2) (x a) s (2,1) (x a) = s (4,1) (x a) + s (3,2) (x a) + s (3,1,1) (x a) + s (2,2,1) (x a) + ( ) a 1 a 0 s(2,1,1) (x a) + ( ) a 1 a 2 s(2,2) (x a) + ( ) a 1 a 2 + a 2 a 0 s(3,1) (x a) + ( ) ( ) a 1 a 2 a 1 a 0 s(2,1) (x a).
116 Example. For any diagram λ, c λ λλ (a) = (i, j) λ ( ai λi a λ j j+1 ).
117 Example. For any diagram λ, c λ λλ (a) = (i, j) λ ( ai λi a λ j j+1 ). Setting a i = i for all i gives the product of the hooks of λ.
118 Example. For any diagram λ, c λ λλ (a) = (i, j) λ ( ai λi a λ j j+1 ). Setting a i = i for all i gives the product of the hooks of λ. Proof of the theorem. Calculate cλµ ν (a) by induction on ν µ.
119 Example. For any diagram λ, c λ λλ (a) = (i, j) λ ( ai λi a λ j j+1 ). Setting a i = i for all i gives the product of the hooks of λ. Proof of the theorem. Calculate cλµ ν (a) by induction on ν µ. Starting point: the Vanishing Theorem (A. Okounkov, 96): s λ (a ρ a) = 0 unless λ ρ, s λ (a λ a) 0, where a ρ = (a 1 ρ1, a 2 ρ2,... ).
120 Hence, if R = {µ} is a one-term sequence, then c µ λµ (a) = s λ(a µ a), a µ = (a 1 µ1, a 2 µ2,... ),
121 Hence, if R = {µ} is a one-term sequence, then c µ λµ (a) = s λ(a µ a), a µ = (a 1 µ1, a 2 µ2,... ), and so c µ λµ (a) = T α λ ( a T (α) µt (α) a T (α) c(α) ).
122 Hence, if R = {µ} is a one-term sequence, then c µ λµ (a) = s λ(a µ a), a µ = (a 1 µ1, a 2 µ2,... ), and so c µ λµ (a) = T α λ ( a T (α) µt (α) a T (α) c(α) ). Then use the recurrence ( cλµ ν (a) = 1 cλµ ν a ν a µ +(a) cλµ ), ν (a) µ µ + ν ν where a ν a µ = ) i 1 ((a ν ) i (a µ ) i (M. & Sagan, 99).
123 Knutson Tao puzzles Write the binary sequences corresponding to λ, µ, ν around the border of an equilateral triangle:
124 Knutson Tao puzzles Write the binary sequences corresponding to λ, µ, ν around the border of an equilateral triangle: λ µ ν
125 Knutson Tao puzzles Write the binary sequences corresponding to λ, µ, ν around the border of an equilateral triangle: λ µ ν Theorem [KT 03]. The Littlewood Richardson polynomial cλµ ν (a) equals the sum of weights of triangular puzzles, where an additional puzzle piece can be used.
126 Additional puzzle piece
127 Additional puzzle piece Each occurrence of this puzzle piece contributes a factor by the rule: i j a i m a j m
128 Quantum immanants (Okounkov, 96) Let l(λ) n and k = λ. Consider the irreducible representation V λ of the symmetric group S k.
129 Quantum immanants (Okounkov, 96) Let l(λ) n and k = λ. Consider the irreducible representation V λ of the symmetric group S k. The orthonormal Young basis {v U } of V λ is parameterized by the standard λ-tableaux U.
130 Quantum immanants (Okounkov, 96) Let l(λ) n and k = λ. Consider the irreducible representation V λ of the symmetric group S k. The orthonormal Young basis {v U } of V λ is parameterized by the standard λ-tableaux U. Set φ U = (s v U, v U ) s 1 C[S k ]. s S k Consider the natural action of the symmetric group S k on the tensor product of k copies of C n. Denote by Φ U the image of φ U in (Mat n ) k.
131 Consider the Lie algebra gl n with its standard basis {E ab }, where a, b {1,..., n}.
132 Consider the Lie algebra gl n with its standard basis {E ab }, where a, b {1,..., n}. For any c C set n E c = e ab ( E ab δ ab c ) Mat n U(gl n ). a,b=1
133 Consider the Lie algebra gl n with its standard basis {E ab }, where a, b {1,..., n}. For any c C set n E c = e ab ( E ab δ ab c ) Mat n U(gl n ). a,b=1 The tensor products of the form (E c 1 )... (E c k ) are regarded as elements of the algebra Mat n... Mat n U(gl n ).
134 The quantum immanant S λ associated with λ is the element of U(gl n ) defined by S λ = 1 H λ tr (E c 1 )... (E c k ) Φ U, where the trace is taken over all matrix factors, U is a standard λ-tableau, c r = j i if r occupies the box (i, j) in U, H λ = k!/ dim V λ is the product of the hooks of λ.
135 Examples. Quantum minors (Capelli elements) S (1 k ) = a 1 < <a k p S k sgn p E a1,a p(1)... (E + k 1) ak,a p(k).
136 Examples. Quantum minors (Capelli elements) S (1 k ) = a 1 < <a k p S k sgn p E a1,a p(1)... (E + k 1) ak,a p(k). Quantum permanents S (k) = 1 α a 1 a 1!... α n! k p S k E a1,a p(1)... (E k + 1) ak,a p(k), where α i is the multiplicity of i in a 1,..., a k, each a r {1,..., n}.
137 The quantum immanants S λ with l(λ) n form a basis of the center of the universal enveloping algebra U(gl n ).
138 The quantum immanants S λ with l(λ) n form a basis of the center of the universal enveloping algebra U(gl n ). Define the coefficients fλµ ν by the expansion S λ S µ = ν f ν λµ S ν.
139 The quantum immanants S λ with l(λ) n form a basis of the center of the universal enveloping algebra U(gl n ). Define the coefficients fλµ ν by the expansion S λ S µ = ν f ν λµ S ν. Corollary. f ν λµ = c ν λµ (a) for the specialization a i = i for i Z.
140 The coefficient fλµ ν is zero unless λ, µ ν. If λ, µ ν then f ν λµ = R T α λ T (α) unbarred ( ) ρ(α) T (α) c(α), summed over all sequences R from µ to ν and all ν-bounded reverse λ-tableaux T T (λ, R). In particular, the f ν λµ are nonnegative integers.
141 Example. For any n 3 we have S (2) S (2,1) = S (4,1) + S (3,2) + S (3,1,1) + S (2,2,1) + S (2,1,1) + 5 S (3,1) + 3 S (2,2) + 3 S (2,1).
142 Example. For any n 3 we have S (2) S (2,1) = S (4,1) + S (3,2) + S (3,1,1) + S (2,2,1) + S (2,1,1) + 5 S (3,1) + 3 S (2,2) + 3 S (2,1). If n = 2 then S (2) S (2,1) = S (4,1) + S (3,2) + 5 S (3,1) + 3 S (2,2) + 3 S (2,1).
143 Equivariant Schubert calculus on the Grassmannian The torus T = (C ) N acts naturally on Gr n,n. The equivariant cohomology ring H T (Gr n,n) is a module over Z[t 1,..., t N ] = H T ({pt}).
144 Equivariant Schubert calculus on the Grassmannian The torus T = (C ) N acts naturally on Gr n,n. The equivariant cohomology ring H T (Gr n,n) is a module over Z[t 1,..., t N ] = H T ({pt}). It has a basis of the equivariant Schubert classes σ λ parameterized by all diagrams λ contained in the n m rectangle, m = N n.
145 Corollary. We have σ λ σ µ = ν d ν λµ σ ν, where dλµ ν = c λµ ν (a) with the sequence a specialized as follows: a m+1 = t 1,..., a n = t N, and a i = 0 for all remaining values of i.
146 Corollary. We have σ λ σ µ = ν d ν λµ σ ν, where dλµ ν = c λµ ν (a) with the sequence a specialized as follows: a m+1 = t 1,..., a n = t N, and a i = 0 for all remaining values of i. The d ν λµ are polynomials in the t i t j, i > j with positive integer coefficients (the positivity property, Graham 01).
147 The coefficients d ν λµ, regarded as polynomials in the a i, are independent of n and m, as soon as the inequalities n λ 1 + µ 1 and m λ 1 + µ 1 hold (the stability property).
148 The coefficients d ν λµ, regarded as polynomials in the a i, are independent of n and m, as soon as the inequalities n λ 1 + µ 1 and m λ 1 + µ 1 hold (the stability property). Remark. The puzzle rule of Knutson and Tao gives a manifestly positive formula for the dλµ ν, while the tableau rule is manifestly stable.
149 Example. For any n 3 and m 4 we have σ (2) σ (2,1) = σ (4,1) + σ (3,2) + σ (3,1,1) + σ (2,2,1) + (t m t m 1 ) σ (2,1,1) + (t m+2 t m 1 ) σ (2,2) + (t m+2 t m 1 + t m t m 2 ) σ (3,1) + (t m+2 t m 1 ) (t m t m 1 ) σ (2,1).
150 Dimensions of skew diagrams Let µ λ be two diagrams. The skew diagram θ = λ/µ is the set-theoretical difference of the diagrams λ and µ:
151 Dimensions of skew diagrams Let µ λ be two diagrams. The skew diagram θ = λ/µ is the set-theoretical difference of the diagrams λ and µ: Example. λ = (10, 8, 5, 4, 2) and µ = (6, 3): θ = λ/µ
152 If θ has n = θ boxes, then a standard θ-tableau is obtained by filling the boxes bijectively with the numbers {1, 2,..., n} in such a way that the entries increase along the rows and down the columns.
153 If θ has n = θ boxes, then a standard θ-tableau is obtained by filling the boxes bijectively with the numbers {1, 2,..., n} in such a way that the entries increase along the rows and down the columns. The dimension dim θ of a skew diagram θ is the number of the standard θ-tableaux.
154 If θ has n = θ boxes, then a standard θ-tableau is obtained by filling the boxes bijectively with the numbers {1, 2,..., n} in such a way that the entries increase along the rows and down the columns. The dimension dim θ of a skew diagram θ is the number of the standard θ-tableaux. Set H θ = θ! dim θ.
155 If θ is normal (nonskew), then H θ coincides with the product of the hooks of θ due to the hook formula.
156 If θ is normal (nonskew), then H θ coincides with the product of the hooks of θ due to the hook formula. Example. The hooks of θ = (4, 3, 1):
157 If θ is normal (nonskew), then H θ coincides with the product of the hooks of θ due to the hook formula. Example. The hooks of θ = (4, 3, 1): Hence H θ = = 576 and dim θ = 70.
158 If θ is normal (nonskew), then H θ coincides with the product of the hooks of θ due to the hook formula. Example. The hooks of θ = (4, 3, 1): Hence H θ = = 576 and dim θ = 70. If θ = θ 1 θ r, then H θ = H θ1... H θr.
159 Example. Let θ = (3, 2)/(1). The standard θ-tableaux are
160 Example. Let θ = (3, 2)/(1). The standard θ-tableaux are Hence dim θ = 5 and H θ = 24/5.
161 Example. Let θ = (3, 2)/(1). The standard θ-tableaux are Hence dim θ = 5 and H θ = 24/5. Corollary. We have c ν λµ = ρ ( 1) ν/ρ H ρ H ν/ρ H ρ/λ H ρ/µ, summed over the diagrams ρ which contain both λ and µ, and are contained in ν.
162 Example. Let λ = µ = (2, 1), ν = (3, 2, 1).
163 Example. Let λ = µ = (2, 1), ν = (3, 2, 1). Then ρ runs over the set of diagrams { } (2, 1), (3, 1), (2, 2), (2, 1, 1), (3, 2), (3, 1, 1), (2, 2, 1), (3, 2, 1).
164 Example. Let λ = µ = (2, 1), ν = (3, 2, 1). Then ρ runs over the set of diagrams { } (2, 1), (3, 1), (2, 2), (2, 1, 1), (3, 2), (3, 1, 1), (2, 2, 1), (3, 2, 1). Here H ν/ρ = H ρ/λ = H ρ/µ = 1 for all ρ.
165 Example. Let λ = µ = (2, 1), ν = (3, 2, 1). Then ρ runs over the set of diagrams { } (2, 1), (3, 1), (2, 2), (2, 1, 1), (3, 2), (3, 1, 1), (2, 2, 1), (3, 2, 1). Here H ν/ρ = H ρ/λ = H ρ/µ = 1 for all ρ. Hence c (3,2,1) (2,1)(2,1) = = 2.
Classical Lie algebras and Yangians
Classical Lie algebras and Yangians Alexander Molev University of Sydney Advanced Summer School Integrable Systems and Quantum Symmetries Prague 2007 Lecture 1. Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras
More informationPuzzles Littlewood-Richardson coefficients and Horn inequalities
Puzzles Littlewood-Richardson coefficients and Horn inequalities Olga Azenhas CMUC, Centre for Mathematics, University of Coimbra Seminar of the Mathematics PhD Program UCoimbra-UPorto Porto, 6 October
More informationShifted symmetric functions I: the vanishing property, skew Young diagrams and symmetric group characters
I: the vanishing property, skew Young diagrams and symmetric group characters Valentin Féray Institut für Mathematik, Universität Zürich Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire Bertinoro, Italy, Sept. 11th-12th-13th
More informationCombinatorial bases for representations. of the Lie superalgebra gl m n
Combinatorial bases for representations of the Lie superalgebra gl m n Alexander Molev University of Sydney Gelfand Tsetlin bases for gln Gelfand Tsetlin bases for gl n Finite-dimensional irreducible representations
More informationThe Littlewood-Richardson Rule
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP The Littlewood-Richardson Rule Aman Barot B.Sc.(Hons.) Mathematics and Computer Science, III Year April 20, 2014 Abstract We motivate and prove the Littlewood-Richardson
More informationCombinatorics for algebraic geometers
Combinatorics for algebraic geometers Calculations in enumerative geometry Maria Monks March 17, 214 Motivation Enumerative geometry In the late 18 s, Hermann Schubert investigated problems in what is
More informationA note on quantum products of Schubert classes in a Grassmannian
J Algebr Comb (2007) 25:349 356 DOI 10.1007/s10801-006-0040-5 A note on quantum products of Schubert classes in a Grassmannian Dave Anderson Received: 22 August 2006 / Accepted: 14 September 2006 / Published
More informationEQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY LECTURE EIGHT: EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY OF GRASSMANNIANS II. σ λ = [Ω λ (F )] T,
EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY LECTURE EIGHT: EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY OF GRASSMANNIANS II WILLIAM FULTON NOTES BY DAVE ANDERSON 1 As before, let X = Gr(k,n), let l = n k, and let 0 S C n X
More informationProducts of Factorial Schur Functions
Products of Factorial Schur Functions Victor Kreiman Department of Mathematics University of Georgia Athens, GA 3060 USA vkreiman@math.uga.edu Submitted: Mar 9, 008; Accepted: Jun 10, 008; Published: Jun
More informationLecture 6 : Kronecker Product of Schur Functions Part I
CS38600-1 Complexity Theory A Spring 2003 Lecture 6 : Kronecker Product of Schur Functions Part I Lecturer & Scribe: Murali Krishnan Ganapathy Abstract The irreducible representations of S n, i.e. the
More informationYOUNG TABLEAUX AND THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP
YOUNG TABLEAUX AND THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP YUFEI ZHAO ABSTRACT We explore an intimate connection between Young tableaux and representations of the symmetric group We describe the construction
More informationTHE INVOLUTIVE NATURE OF THE LITTLEWOOD RICHARDSON COMMUTATIVITY BIJECTION O. AZENHAS, R.C. KING AND I. TERADA
Pré-Publicações do Departamento de Matemática Universidade de Coimbra Preprint Number 6 7 THE INVOLUTIVE NATURE OF THE LITTLEWOOD RICHARDSON COMMUTATIVITY BIJECTION O. AZENHAS, R.C. KING AND I. TERADA
More informationEQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY LECTURE TEN: MORE ON FLAG VARIETIES
EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY IN ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY LECTURE TEN: MORE ON FLAG VARIETIES WILLIAM FULTON NOTES BY DAVE ANDERSON 1 A. Molev has just given a simple, efficient, and positive formula for the structure
More informationKostka multiplicity one for multipartitions
Kostka multiplicity one for multipartitions James Janopaul-Naylor and C. Ryan Vinroot Abstract If [λ(j)] is a multipartition of the positive integer n (a sequence of partitions with total size n), and
More informationReduction formulae from the factorization Theorem of Littlewood-Richardson polynomials by King, Tollu and Toumazet
FPSAC 2008, Valparaiso-Viña del Mar, Chile DMTCS proc. AJ, 2008, 483 494 Reduction formulae from the factorization Theorem of Littlewood-Richardson polynomials by King, Tollu and Toumazet Soojin Cho and
More informationCatalan functions and k-schur positivity
Catalan functions and k-schur positivity Jonah Blasiak Drexel University joint work with Jennifer Morse, Anna Pun, and Dan Summers November 2018 Theorem (Haiman) Macdonald positivity conjecture The modified
More informationOn Tensor Products of Polynomial Representations
Canad. Math. Bull. Vol. 5 (4), 2008 pp. 584 592 On Tensor Products of Polynomial Representations Kevin Purbhoo and Stephanie van Willigenburg Abstract. We determine the necessary and sufficient combinatorial
More informationEquivariant cohomology of infinite-dimensional Grassmannian and shifted Schur functions
Equivariant cohomology of infinite-dimensional Grassmannian and shifted Schur functions Jia-Ming (Frank) Liou, Albert Schwarz February 28, 2012 1. H = L 2 (S 1 ): the space of square integrable complex-valued
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 2 Dec 2008
An algorithmic Littlewood-Richardson rule arxiv:08.0435v [math.co] Dec 008 Ricky Ini Liu Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Massachusetts riliu@math.mit.edu June, 03 Abstract We introduce
More informationCylindric Young Tableaux and their Properties
Cylindric Young Tableaux and their Properties Eric Neyman (Montgomery Blair High School) Mentor: Darij Grinberg (MIT) Fourth Annual MIT PRIMES Conference May 17, 2014 1 / 17 Introduction Young tableaux
More informationEQUIVARIANT LITTLEWOOD-RICHARDSON SKEW TABLEAUX
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 36, Number 5, May, Pages 589 67 S -9947(9)486-4 Article electronically published on December 8, 9 EQUIVARIANT LITTLEWOOD-RICHARDSON SKEW TABLEAUX
More informationOperators on k-tableaux and the k-littlewood Richardson rule for a special case. Sarah Elizabeth Iveson
Operators on k-tableaux and the k-littlewood Richardson rule for a special case by Sarah Elizabeth Iveson A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of
More informationLittlewood-Richardson coefficients, the hive model and Horn inequalities
Littlewood-Richardson coefficients, the hive model and Horn inequalities Ronald C King School of Mathematics, University of Southampton Southampton, SO7 BJ, England Presented at: SLC 6 Satellite Seminar,
More informationWreath Product Symmetric Functions
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 3, 2009, no. 1, 1-19 Wreath Product Symmetric Functions Frank Ingram Mathematics Department, Winston-Salem State University Winston-Salem, NC 27110, USA ingramfr@wssu.edu
More informationSCHUR FUNCTIONS AND DOMINO TABLEAUX GENERALISATION TO K-THEORY
SCHUR FUNCTIONS AND DOMINO TABLEAUX GENERALISATION TO K-THEORY FLORENCE MAAS-GARIÉPY. Introduction. Symmetric functions, partitions and Young tableaux.. Symmetric functions.. Partitions and Young tableaux..
More informationAn algorithmic Littlewood-Richardson rule
J Algebr Comb (2010) 31: 253 266 DOI 10.1007/s10801-009-0184-1 An algorithmic Littlewood-Richardson rule Ricky Ini Liu Received: 3 March 2009 / Accepted: 20 May 2009 / Published online: 21 January 2010
More informationMultiplicity-Free Products of Schur Functions
Annals of Combinatorics 5 (2001) 113-121 0218-0006/01/020113-9$1.50+0.20/0 c Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2001 Annals of Combinatorics Multiplicity-Free Products of Schur Functions John R. Stembridge Department
More informationPOLYNOMIAL BEHAVIOUR OF KOSTKA NUMBERS
POLYNOMIAL BEHAVIOUR OF KOSTKA NUMBERS DINUSHI MUNASINGHE Abstract. Given two standard partitions λ + = (λ + 1 λ+ s ) and λ = (λ 1 λ r ) we write λ = (λ +, λ ) and set s λ (x 1,..., x t ) := s λt (x 1,...,
More informationh r t r 1 (1 x i=1 (1 + x i t). e r t r = i=1 ( 1) i e i h r i = 0 r 1.
. Four definitions of Schur functions.. Lecture : Jacobi s definition (ca 850). Fix λ = (λ λ n and X = {x,...,x n }. () a α = det ( ) x α i j for α = (α,...,α n ) N n (2) Jacobi s def: s λ = a λ+δ /a δ
More informationPUZZLES IN K-HOMOLOGY OF GRASSMANNIANS
PUZZLES IN K-HOMOLOGY OF GRASSMANNIANS PAVLO PYLYAVSKYY AND JED YANG Abstract. Knutson, Tao, and Woodward [KTW4] formulated a Littlewood Richardson rule for the cohomology ring of Grassmannians in terms
More informationOn certain family of B-modules
On certain family of B-modules Piotr Pragacz (IM PAN, Warszawa) joint with Witold Kraśkiewicz with results of Masaki Watanabe Issai Schur s dissertation (Berlin, 1901): classification of irreducible polynomial
More informationA Murnaghan-Nakayama Rule for k-schur Functions
A Murnaghan-Nakayama Rule for k-schur Functions Anne Schilling (joint work with Jason Bandlow, Mike Zabrocki) University of California, Davis October 31, 2012 Outline History The Murnaghan-Nakayama rule
More informationON KRONECKER PRODUCTS OF CHARACTERS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS WITH FEW COMPONENTS
ON KRONECKER PRODUCTS OF CHARACTERS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUPS WITH FEW COMPONENTS C. BESSENRODT AND S. VAN WILLIGENBURG Abstract. Confirming a conjecture made by Bessenrodt and Kleshchev in 1999, we classify
More informationIrreducible Representations of symmetric group S n
Irreducible Representations of symmetric group S n Yin Su 045 Good references: ulton Young tableaux with applications to representation theory and geometry ulton Harris Representation thoery a first course
More informationMultiplicity Free Expansions of Schur P-Functions
Annals of Combinatorics 11 (2007) 69-77 0218-0006/07/010069-9 DOI 10.1007/s00026-007-0306-1 c Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2007 Annals of Combinatorics Multiplicity Free Expansions of Schur P-Functions Kristin
More informationA Note on Skew Characters of Symmetric Groups Jay Taylor
A Note on Skew Characters of Symmetric Groups Jay Taylor Abstract. In previous work Regev used part of the representation theory of Lie superalgebras to compute the values of a character of the symmetric
More informationVariations on a Theme of Schubert Calculus
Variations on a Theme of Schubert Calculus Lecture Notes by Maria Monks Gillespie Equivariant Combinatorics Workshop, CRM, June 12-16, 217 Schubert Calculus Quiz: How Schubert-y are you?.1. How many lines
More informationTopological Matter, Strings, K-theory and related areas September 2016
Topological Matter, Strings, K-theory and related areas 26 30 September 2016 This talk is based on joint work with from Caltech. Outline 1. A string theorist s view of 2. Mixed Hodge polynomials associated
More informationOn Multiplicity-free Products of Schur P -functions. 1 Introduction
On Multiplicity-free Products of Schur P -functions Christine Bessenrodt Fakultät für Mathematik und Physik, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Welfengarten 3067 Hannover, Germany; bessen@math.uni-hannover.de
More informationVariations on a Theme of Schubert Calculus
Variations on a Theme of Schubert Calculus Lecture Notes by Maria Gillespie Equivariant Combinatorics Workshop, CRM, June 12-16, 217 Schubert Calculus Quiz: How Schubert-y are you?.1. How many lines pass
More informationFactorial Schur functions via the six vertex model
Factorial Schur functions via the six vertex model Peter J. McNamara Department of Mathematics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA 02139, USA petermc@math.mit.edu October 31, 2009 Abstract For a
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 8 Oct 2017
REMARKS ON SKEW CHARACTERS OF IWAHORI-HECKE ALGEBRAS DEKE ZHAO Abstract. In this short note we give a new proof of the quantum generalization of Regev s theorems by applying the Murnaghan-Nakayama formula
More informationTHE S 1 -EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY RINGS OF (n k, k) SPRINGER VARIETIES
Horiguchi, T. Osaka J. Math. 52 (2015), 1051 1062 THE S 1 -EQUIVARIANT COHOMOLOGY RINGS OF (n k, k) SPRINGER VARIETIES TATSUYA HORIGUCHI (Received January 6, 2014, revised July 14, 2014) Abstract The main
More informationON SOME FACTORIZATION FORMULAS OF K-k-SCHUR FUNCTIONS
ON SOME FACTORIZATION FORMULAS OF K-k-SCHUR FUNCTIONS MOTOKI TAKIGIKU Abstract. We give some new formulas about factorizations of K-k-Schur functions, analogous to the k-rectangle factorization formula
More informationA LITTLEWOOD-RICHARDSON RULE FOR TWO-STEP FLAG VARIETIES
A LITTLEWOOD-RICHARDSON RULE FOR TWO-STEP FLAG VARIETIES IZZET COSKUN Abstract. We establish a positive geometric rule for computing the structure constants of the cohomology of two-step flag varieties
More informationCasimir elements for classical Lie algebras. and affine Kac Moody algebras
Casimir elements for classical Lie algebras and affine Kac Moody algebras Alexander Molev University of Sydney Plan of lectures Plan of lectures Casimir elements for the classical Lie algebras from the
More informationResearch Statement. Edward Richmond. October 13, 2012
Research Statement Edward Richmond October 13, 2012 Introduction My mathematical interests include algebraic combinatorics, algebraic geometry and Lie theory. In particular, I study Schubert calculus,
More informationGROMOV-WITTEN INVARIANTS AND QUANTUM COHOMOLOGY OF GRASSMANNIANS
GROMOV-WITTEN INVARIANTS AND QUANTUM COHOMOLOGY OF GRASSMANNIANS HARRY TAMVAKIS Abstract. This is the written version of my five lectures at the Banach Center mini-school on Schubert Varieties, in Warsaw,
More informationIdentities Relating Schur s-functions and Q-Functions
Identities Relating Schur s-functions and Q-Functions by Elizabeth Angela DeWitt A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Mathematics)
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.ag] 15 Aug 2000
arxiv:math/0004137v2 [math.ag] 15 Aug 2000 A LITTLEWOOD-RICHARDSON RULE FOR THE K-THEORY OF GRASSMANNIANS ANDERS SKOVSTED BUCH Abstract. We prove an explicit combinatorial formula for the structure constants
More informationA Puzzle-Based Synthesis Algorithm For a Triple Intersection of Schubert Varieties. Andrew Alexander Harold Brown
A Puzzle-Based Synthesis Algorithm For a Triple Intersection of Schubert Varieties by Andrew Alexander Harold Brown A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement
More informationNOTES FOR MATH 740 (SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS)
NOTES FOR MATH 740 (SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS) STEVEN V SAM Contents 1. Definition and motivation 1 2. Bases 5 3. Schur functions and the RSK algorithm 14 4. Representation theory of the symmetric groups 27
More informationREPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C)
REPRESENTATIONS OF S n AND GL(n, C) SEAN MCAFEE 1 outline For a given finite group G, we have that the number of irreducible representations of G is equal to the number of conjugacy classes of G Although
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 5 Aug 2016
AN ALGEBRAIC FORMULA FOR THE KOSTKA-FOULKES POLYNOMIALS arxiv:1608.01775v1 [math.rt] 5 Aug 2016 TIMOTHEE W. BRYAN, NAIHUAN JING Abstract. An algebraic formula for the Kostka-Foukles polynomials is given
More informationFactorial Grothendieck Polynomials
Factorial Grothendieck Polynomials Peter J. McNamara Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia petermcn@maths.usyd.edu.au Submitted: Aug 10, 2005; Accepted: Jan
More informationSHIFTED K-THEORETIC POIRIER-REUTENAUER BIALGEBRA
SHIFTED K-THEORETIC POIRIER-REUTENAUER BIALGEBRA ADAM KEILTHY, REBECCA PATRIAS, LILLIAN WEBSTER, YINUO ZHANG, SHUQI ZHOU Abstract We use shifted K-theoretic jeu de taquin to show that the weak K-Knuth
More informationA Plethysm Formula for p µ (x) h λ (x) William F. Doran IV
A Plethysm Formula for p µ (x) h λ (x) William F. Doran IV Department of Mathematics California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 925 doran@cco.caltech.edu Submitted: September 0, 996; Accepted: May
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ra] 3 Nov 2004
arxiv:math/0411063v1 [math.ra] 3 Nov 2004 EIGENVALUES OF HERMITIAN MATRICES WITH POSITIVE SUM OF BOUNDED RANK ANDERS SKOVSTED BUCH Abstract. We give a minimal list of inequalities characterizing the possible
More informationGENERALIZATION OF THE SIGN REVERSING INVOLUTION ON THE SPECIAL RIM HOOK TABLEAUX. Jaejin Lee
Korean J. Math. 8 (00), No., pp. 89 98 GENERALIZATION OF THE SIGN REVERSING INVOLUTION ON THE SPECIAL RIM HOOK TABLEAUX Jaejin Lee Abstract. Eğecioğlu and Remmel [] gave a combinatorial interpretation
More informationDiscrete tomography, RSK correspondence and Kronecker products
Discrete tomography, RSK correspondence and Kronecker products Instituto de Matemáticas, Unidad Morelia Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Joint work with Diana Avella-Alaminos Mathematical Foundations
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 6 Apr 2007
AN S -SYMMETRIC LITTLEWOOD-RICHARDSON RULE HUGH THOMAS AND ALEXANDER YONG arxiv:070.087v [math.co] 6 Apr 2007. INTRODUCTION Fix Young shapes λ, µ, ν Λ := l k. Viewing the Littlewood-Richardson coefficients
More informationKraśkiewicz-Pragacz modules and some positivity properties of Schubert polynomials
Kraśkiewicz-Pragacz modules and some positivity properties of Schubert polynomials Masaki Watanabe Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences, the University of Tokyo December 9, 2015 Masaki Watanabe KP
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 16 Aug 2018
AN ORTHOSYMPLECTIC PIERI RULE arxiv:1808.05589v1 [math.co] 16 Aug 2018 ANNA STOKKE University of Winnipeg Department of Mathematics and Statistics Winnipeg, Manitoba Canada R3B 2E9 Abstract. The classical
More informationDUAL IMMACULATE QUASISYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS EXPAND POSITIVELY INTO YOUNG QUASISYMMETRIC SCHUR FUNCTIONS
DUAL IMMACULATE QUASISYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS EXPAND POSITIVELY INTO YOUNG QUASISYMMETRIC SCHUR FUNCTIONS EDWARD E. ALLEN, JOSHUA HALLAM, AND SARAH K. MASON Abstract. We describe a combinatorial formula for
More information5-VERTEX MODELS, GELFAND-TSETLIN PATTERNS AND SEMISTANDARD YOUNG TABLEAUX
5-VERTEX MODELS, GELFAND-TSETLIN PATTERNS AND SEMISTANDARD YOUNG TABLEAUX TANTELY A. RAKOTOARISOA 1. Introduction In statistical mechanics, one studies models based on the interconnections between thermodynamic
More informationCombinatorial Structures
Combinatorial Structures Contents 1 Permutations 1 Partitions.1 Ferrers diagrams....................................... Skew diagrams........................................ Dominance order......................................
More informationFactorial Schur Functions and the Yang-Baxter Equation
Factorial Schur Functions and the Yang-Baxter Equation Daniel Bump, Peter J. McNamara and Maki Nakasuji August 12, 2011 Abstract. Factorial Schur functions are generalizations of Schur functions that have,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math-ph] 18 May 2017
SHIFTED TABLEAUX AND PRODUCTS OF SCHUR S SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS KEIICHI SHIGECHI arxiv:1705.06437v1 [math-ph] 18 May 2017 Abstract. We introduce a new combinatorial object, semistandard increasing decomposition
More informationCombinatorics and geometry of Littlewood-Richardson cones
Combinatorics and geometry of Littlewood-Richardson cones Igor Pak Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02138 USA e-mail: pak@math.mit.edu and Ernesto Vallejo Instituto de Matemáticas, Unidad
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP (FOLLOWING [Ful97])
REPRESENTATION THEORY OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP (FOLLOWING [Ful97]) MICHAEL WALTER. Diagrams and Tableaux Diagrams and Tableaux. A (Young) diagram λ is a partition of a natural number n 0, which we often
More informationKostka multiplicity one for multipartitions
Kostka multiplicity one for multipartitions James Janopaul-Naylor and C. Ryan Vinroot Abstract If [λ(j)] is a multipartition of the positive integer n (a sequence of partitions with total size n), and
More informationAppendix to: Generalized Stability of Kronecker Coefficients. John R. Stembridge. 14 August 2014
Appendix to: Generalized Stability of Kronecker Coefficients John R. Stembridge 14 August 2014 Contents A. Line reduction B. Complementation C. On rectangles D. Kronecker coefficients and Gaussian coefficients
More informationCALTECH ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY SEMINAR: A GEOMETRIC LITTLEWOOD-RICHARDSON RULE RAVI VAKIL
CALTECH ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY SEMINAR: A GEOMETRIC LITTLEWOOD-RICHARDSON RULE RAVI VAKIL ABSTRACT. I will describe an explicit geometric Littlewood-Richardson rule, interpreted as deforming the intersection
More informationSCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR U(n)
SCHUR-WEYL DUALITY FOR U(n) EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from a lecture given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in December 2009.
More informationA Pieri rule for key polynomials
Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire 80B (2018) Article #78, 12 pp. Proceedings of the 30 th Conference on Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics (Hanover) A Pieri rule for key polynomials Sami
More informationA combinatorial approach to the q, t-symmetry relation in Macdonald polynomials
A combinatorial approach to the q, t-symmetry relation in Macdonald polynomials Maria Monks Gillespie Department of Mathematics University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA, U.S.A. monks@math.berkeley.edu
More informationFoundations of Matrix Analysis
1 Foundations of Matrix Analysis In this chapter we recall the basic elements of linear algebra which will be employed in the remainder of the text For most of the proofs as well as for the details, the
More informationA Formula for the Specialization of Skew Schur Functions
A Formula for the Specialization of Skew Schur Functions The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation As Published Publisher
More informationCHROMATIC CLASSICAL SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS
CHROMATIC CLASSICAL SYMMETRIC FUNCTIONS SOOJIN CHO AND STEPHANIE VAN WILLIGENBURG Abstract. In this note we classify when a skew Schur function is a positive linear combination of power sum symmetric functions.
More informationModern developments in Schubert calculus
These transparencies are available athttp://math.cornell.edu/ allenk/ Modern developments in Schubert calculus Allen Knutson (Cornell) Winston-Salem, North Carolina AMS conference, September Abstract Schubert
More informationLinear equivalence and identical Young tableau bijections for the conjugation symmetry of Littlewood-Richardson coefficients
Linear equivalence and identical Young tableau bijections for the conjugation symmetry of Littlewood-Richardson coefficients O. Azenhas, A. Conflitti, R. Mamede CMUC Centre for Mathematics, University
More informationSPECTRAL FUNCTIONS OF INVARIANT OPERATORS ON SKEW MULTIPLICITY FREE SPACES
SPECTRAL FUNCTIONS OF INVARIANT OPERATORS ON SKEW MULTIPLICITY FREE SPACES BY MICHAEL WEINGART A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
More informationTHE HIVE MODEL AND THE POLYNOMIAL NATURE OF STRETCHED LITTLEWOOD RICHARDSON COEFFICIENTS
Séminaire Lotharingien de Combinatoire 54A (6), Article B54Ad THE HIVE MODEL AND THE POLYNOMIAL NATURE OF STRETCHED LITTLEWOOD RICHARDSON COEFFICIENTS R.C. KING, C. TOLLU, AND F. TOUMAZET Abstract. The
More informationKostka Numbers and Littlewood-Richardson Coefficients: Distributed Computation
Kostka Numbers and Littlewood-Richardson Coefficients: Distributed Computation Janvier Nzeutchap Laboratoire d Informatique de l Institut Gaspard-Monge (IGM), UMR-CNRS 8049 F-77454 Marne-la-Vallée cedex
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.ag] 21 Sep 2003
EIGENVALUES, SINGULAR VALUES, AND LITTLEWOOD-RICHARDSON COEFFICIENTS arxiv:math/0301307v2 [math.ag] 21 Sep 2003 SERGEY FOMIN, WILLIAM FULTON, CHI-KWONG LI, AND YIU-TUNG POON Abstract. We characterize the
More informationPlethysm of Schur Functions and Irreducible Polynomial Representations of the Complex General Linear Group
Plethysm of Schur Functions and Irreducible Polynomial Representations of the Complex General Linear Group Rediet Abebe Harvard College Department of Mathematics March 25, 2013 Contents 1 Irreducible Polynomial
More informationREPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n
REPRESENTATION THEORY OF S n EVAN JENKINS Abstract. These are notes from three lectures given in MATH 26700, Introduction to Representation Theory of Finite Groups, at the University of Chicago in November
More informationGeometric realization of PRV components and the Littlewood Richardson cone
Contemporary Mathematics Volume 490, 2009 Geometric realization of PRV components and the Littlewood Richardson cone Ivan Dimitrov and Mike Roth To Raja on the occasion of his 70 th birthday Abstract.
More informationResults and conjectures on the number of standard strong marked tableaux
FPSAC 013, Paris, France DMTCS proc. (subm.), by the authors, 1 1 Results and conjectures on the number of standard strong marked tableaux Susanna Fishel 1 and Matjaž Konvalinka 1 School of Mathematical
More informationOn some combinatorial aspects of Representation Theory
On some combinatorial aspects of Representation Theory Doctoral Defense Waldeck Schützer schutzer@math.rutgers.edu Rutgers University March 24, 2004 Representation Theory and Combinatorics p.1/46 Overview
More information1 On the Jacobi-Trudi formula for dual stable Grothendieck polynomials
1 On the Jacobi-Trudi formula for dual stable Grothendieck polynomials Francisc Bozgan, UCLA 1.1 Review We will first begin with a review of the facts that we already now about this problem. Firstly, a
More informationProblems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory
Problems in Linear Algebra and Representation Theory (Most of these were provided by Victor Ginzburg) The problems appearing below have varying level of difficulty. They are not listed in any specific
More informationThe Murnaghan-Nakayama Rule
The Murnaghan-Nakayama Rule Chandranandan Gangopadhyay April 21, 2014 The Murnaghan-Nakayama rule gives us a combinatorial way of computing the character table of any symmetric group S n Before illustrating
More informationStatistical Mechanics & Enumerative Geometry:
Statistical Mechanics & Enumerative Geometry: Christian Korff (ckorff@mathsglaacuk) University Research Fellow of the Royal Society Department of Mathematics, University of Glasgow joint work with C Stroppel
More informationYangian Flags via Quasideterminants
Yangian Flags via Quasideterminants Aaron Lauve LaCIM Université du Québec à Montréal Advanced Course on Quasideterminants and Universal Localization CRM, Barcelona, February 2007 lauve@lacim.uqam.ca Key
More informationEXTREME RAYS OF THE (N,K)-SCHUR CONE
EXTREME RAYS OF THE (N,K-SCHUR CONE CHRISTIAN GAETZ, KYLE MEYER, KA YU TAM, MAX WIMBERLEY, ZIJIAN YAO, AND HEYI ZHU Abstract. We discuss several partial results towards proving White s conjecture on the
More informationAn introduction to Hodge algebras
An introduction to Hodge algebras Federico Galetto May 28, 2009 The Grassmannian Let k be a field, E a k-vector space of dimension m Define Grass(n, E) := {V E dim V = n} If {e 1,, e m } is a basis of
More informationPrimes, partitions and permutations. Paul-Olivier Dehaye ETH Zürich, October 31 st
Primes, Paul-Olivier Dehaye pdehaye@math.ethz.ch ETH Zürich, October 31 st Outline Review of Bump & Gamburd s method A theorem of Moments of derivatives of characteristic polynomials Hypergeometric functions
More informationJournal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A. Factorisation of Littlewood Richardson coefficients
Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 116 (2009) 314 333 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A www.elsevier.com/locate/jcta Factorisation of Littlewood
More informationRAQ2014 ) TEL Fax
RAQ2014 http://hiroyukipersonal.web.fc2.com/pdf/raq2014.pdf 2014 6 1 6 4 4103-1 TEL.076-436-0191 Fax.076-436-0190 http://www.kureha-heights.jp/ hiroyuki@sci.u-toyama.ac.jp 5/12( ) RAQ2014 ) *. * (1, 2,
More information