Wetting & Adhesion on Soft Surfaces Young s Law is dead long live Young s Law. Eric Dufresne

Transcription

1 Wetting & Adhesion on Soft Surfaces Young s Law is dead long live Young s Law Eric Dufresne KITP 2014

2 Wetting Adhesion 3mm 30 um

3 Young s Law relates contact line geometry and material properties in equilibrium cos θ = γ sv γ sl γ lv Thomas Young

4 What happens when the solid surface is soft? Dr. Robert Style glycerol 3-40 micron 3kPa silicone gel 150 micron glass coverslip

5 On a soft substrate, apparent contact angle depends on droplet size and thickness of soft layer 3um soft layer 38um soft layer Glycerol drops on silicone (E=3kPa) Zygo surface profilometer

6 Confocal Imaging Near the Contact Line silicone gel h = 20 μm glass

7 Droplets Deform Soft Substrates Force balance: v l P s 3kPa silicone glass Yonglu Che

8 Profiles change dramatically with droplet size 10 5 z [ m] r [ m]

9 Overall profiles change but how about the cusp? 10 5 z [ m] ) Align the peaks... r [ m]

10 Overall profiles change but how about the cusp? 10 5 z [ m] r [ m] 1) Align the peaks... 2) Rotate...

11 Cusp shape is universal near contact line 61 glycerol drops radii: 18um um Four different substrates: um thick

12 Contact line geometry depends on the wetting fluid 93 m m (c) r [ m] 1 height [ m] r [ m] glycerol 61 drops radii: 18um um substrates: um thick fluorinert fc drops radii: 140um - 270um substrate: 23 um thick

13 While apparent contact angle depends on boundary conditions microscopic configuration of interfaces is universal Glycerol 93.4 o Air o Fluorinated oil Air 151 o 149 o Silicone Silicone

14 Hypothesis: geometry at contact line is determined by a vector balance of surface tensions a la Neumann γ lv γ lv Glycerol Υ sv Air o Fluorinated oil 93.4 o Silicone Υ sl Υ sv Air 151 o 149 o Silicone Υ sl γ lv : l-v surface tension Υ sv : s-v surface tension Υ sl : s-l surface tension What about solid elasticity?

15 vapor liquid γ LV sin θ solid elastic restoring force?

16 position [microns] Elastic Theories Cannot Balance Contact Line Forces σ = εe σ = γ/δ position [microns] Reasonable estimates for contact line width lead to unreasonable strains and displacements

17 Flattening of a linear elastic solid u z = A sin 2πx/λ Elastic restoring force: σ E = εe ~ AE/λ

18 Flattening of a linear elastic solid by surface tension Long Ajdari 1996, Jerison Dufresne 2011, Jagota 2012 u z = A sin 2πx/λ Elastic restoring force: σ E = εe ~ AE/λ Capillary force: σ γ ~ ΥA/λ 2 Υ: solid surface tension

19 Balance of Elasticity and Capillarity Defines a Length scale u z = A sin 2πx/λ σ E σ Υ ~ λ l λ l 1 l = Υ/E Elastocapillary Length λ l 1 Elasticity Dominates Surface Tension Dominates

20 Capillarity Dominates at Short Length Scales on Soft Materials u z = A sin 2πx/λ l = 0.1 A for E = 3 GPa Υ = 0.03 N/m l = 10 nm for E = 3 MPa l = 10 μm for E = 3 KPa

21 Linear Elasticity Plus Solid Surface Tension Captures Profiles h=13.5 um R=216 um h=19.5 um R=72 um h Linear elastic solid with surface tension Sharp features near contact line are controlled by surface tension. Far-field determined by elasticity h=29.5 um R=25 um h=50 um R=177 um

22 Linear Elasticity Plus Solid Surface Tension Predicts Change in Apparent Contact Angle 3um soft layer 38um soft layer Glycerol drops on silicone (E=3kPa)

23 Differences in contact angle drive droplet motion? h v???? γ sv γ sl see e.g. chaudhury, whitesides, troian v

24 Making a thickness gradient 170um 59um 2um 3kPa silicone gel coated on hard substrate with close-packed cylindrical ridges

25 Atomized spray of glycerol on substrate with thickness/stiffness gradient

26 Resting depth depends on drop size Probability density of `final drop position

27 Simple theory for droplet motion on thickness gradient Probability density of `final drop position θ crit = 1.8

28 Condensation, coarsening and evaporation enhance patterning s cooling by Peltier >600 s Peltier off

29 Wetting Summary Young s law fails on soft substrates as R approaches γ E. The shape of the cusp close to contact line is universal and determined by the surface tensions. While the apparent contact angle is not universal it seems to drive droplet motion Theory and preliminary expts: Jerison et al Physical Review Letters 2011 Style et al Soft Matter 2012 Breakdown of Young s Law Style et al Physical Review Letters 2013 Drop movement Style et al PNAS 2013

30 Wetting and adhesion don t look so different on a soft surface Wetting Adhesion

31 Johnson, Kendall & Roberts (1971) JKR d Adhesion Energy, W = γ sp γ sv γ pv Substrate Elasticity, E Substrate surface tension, Υ sv,υ sp?

32 Surface profiles for different stiffness substrates Glass bead 15 micron radius

33 Surface profiles for different stiffness substrates Glass bead 15 micron radius

34 Surface profiles for different stiffness substrates Glass bead 15 micron radius

35 Indentation Depth Changes with Size and Stiffness Glass bead d d, indentation E=3kPa E=85kPa E=250kPa E=500kPa

36 Comparing results with JKR d,indentation E=3kPa W~25mN/m E=85kPa } E=250kPa E=500kPa W~70mN/m

37 Indentation x Young s modulus [N/m] Collapsing the data E=3kPa E=85kPa E=250kPa E=500kPa Bead radius x Young s modulus [N/m]

38 Indentation x Young s modulus [N/m] Indentation proportional to bead radius for small beads E=3kPa E=85kPa E=250kPa E=500kPa Bead radius x Young s modulus [N/m]

39 Indentation, d~r implies constant contact angle Soft solid Liquid

40 Indentation x Young s modulus [N/m] JKR plus surface tension fits data Minimize total energy (a la Carillo/Raphael/Dobrynin 2010): Elastic energy + Adhesion Energy + Surface Tension (from JKR) Υ sv ΔA W = 71 mn m, Υ sv = 45 mn m E=3kPa E=85kPa E=250kPa E=500kPa JKR modified JKR with surface tension Bead radius x Young s modulus [N/m]

41 Small contact limit of JKR plus surface tension d d = WR/Υ sv equivalently Υ sv cos θ = W Υ sv for Υ sv = γ sv, γ sv cos θ = γ sp γ pv Smells like Young s Law Young s Law with soft substrate in the place of the liquid

42 Two Regimes of Contact Style, Hyland, Dufresne Nature Communications 2013 JKR Young s Law

43 Next Step: How does surface tension modify forced-adhesion? Kate Jensen Distance from undeformed surface (µm) D = µm, left hand side, linear scale Distance from center (µm) Distance from undeformed surface (µm) D = µm, right hand side, semilog scale Measured surface profile Elastocapillary theory Low-surface-tension limit Distance from center (µm)

44 Key Findings Young s law doesn t describe wetting of small drops on soft substrates Young s law does describe adhesion of small particles to soft substrates Soft solids have a characteristic length scale Υ sv E, below which elastic response to surface deformation is swamped by surface tension

45