arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 17 Dec 2007
|
|
- Shana Davis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ground state energy of the low density Hubbard model arxiv: v [math-ph] 7 Dec 2007 Robert Seiringer and Jun Yin Department of Physics, Jadwin Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ , USA {rseiring/junyin}@princeton.edu December 7, 2007 Abstract WederivealowerboundonthegroundstateenergyoftheHubbardmodelfor given value of the total spin. In combination with the upper bound derived previously by Giuliani [3], our result proves that in the low density it, the leading order correction compared to the ground state energy of a non-interacting lattice Fermi gas is given by 8πa u d, where u(d) denotes the density of the spin-up (down) particles, and a is the scattering length of the contact interaction potential. This result extends previous work on the corresponding continuum model to the lattice case. Introduction In recent years, much effort has been made to rigorously analyze the properties of dilute quantum gases at low temperature and low density. For repulsive pair interaction potentials, the leading order correction compared to the case of ideal quantum gases of the ground state energy and free energy of continuous quantum gases inthethermodynamicit havebeeninvestigated in[2,3, 4, 0, 8, 9, 6, 7]. In particular, in [8] it was proved that the ground state energy per unit volume of a low-density spin /2 Fermi gas with repulsive pair interaction is (in units where = 2m = ) given by 3 ( 6π 2 ) 2/3 ( 5/3 ) + 5/3 u 5 d +8πa u d +o( 2). (.) Here, u(d) denotes the density of the spin-up (down) particles, and a > 0 is the scattering length of the interaction potential. The total density of the system equals = u + d, and ( u d)/(2 ) is the average spin per particle. c 2007 by the authors. This paper may be reproduced, in its entirety, for non-commercial purposes.
2 The goal of this paper is to extend the analysis in [8] from the continuum to the lattice case. We restrict our attention to the case of a simple cubic, three-dimensional lattice. Without loss of generality, we choose units such that the spacing between two neighboring lattice sites is one; i.e., the configuration space for one (spinless) particle is Z 3. For simplicity, we consider the case where the interaction potential between the particles has zero range, i.e., only particles on the same lattice site interact. This is the simplest version of the Hubbard model, which was originally introduced as a highly simplified model for fermions with repulsive (Coulomb) interaction. For a review of the history, rigorous results and open problems, we refer to [8, 7]. An upper bound to the ground state energy of the desired form was already derived in [3], hence we concentrate here on the lower bound. Our main result is given in Theorem below. In combination, the two bounds show that the ground state energy per unit volume of the Hubbard model at low density = u + d and at given spin polarization ( u d)/(2 ) is given by e 0 ( u, d)+8πa u d +o( 2), where, as before, a denotes the (appropriately defined) scattering length of the interaction potential, and e 0 ( u, d) is the ground state energy per unit volume of the ideal lattice Fermi gas.. Model and Main Result Weconsiderparticleshoppingonthesimplecubiclattice Z 3. ForN spinlessfermions, the appropriate Hilbert space H(N) is the subspace of totally antisymmetric functions in L 2 (Z 3N ), with norm ψ 2 = 3 ψ(x,...x N ) 2. x Z x N Z 3 We define H(N u,n d ) L 2 (Z 3Nu+3N d) as H(N u,n d ) = H(N u ) H(N d ). (.2) Elements ofh(n u,n d )arethusfunctionsofn u +N d variablesthat areantisymmetric both in the first N u and the last N d variables. In appropriate units, the Hubbard Hamiltonian for N u spin-up particles and N d spin-down fermions in a box [0,L] 3 is given by N u N d N u N d H = xi yi +g δ xi,y j, (.3) j= where x,...x Nu and y,...y Nd are the coordinates of the spin-up and spin-down particles, respectively. The usual lattice Laplacian is denoted by ; it acts as ( f)(x) = y, x y = (f(y) f(x)). We consider Dirichlet boundary conditions on [0,L], i.e., we restrict H to functions that vanish outside the cube [,L ] 3. The 2
3 thermodynamic it corresponds to taking L, N u and N d in such a way that u = N u L 3 and d = N d L 3. Note that necessarily 0 u(d) because of the antisymmetry of the wavefunctions. We remark that instead of considering two species of spinless fermions with particle numbers N u and N d, as we do here, one can equivalently consider just one species of N u +N d fermions with spin /2, and restrict to the subspace of total spin S = (N u N d )/2. We will use the former formulation for convenience. The coupling constant g is assumed to be nonnegative and is allowed to take the value +. The scattering length a of the interaction potential gδ 0,x is given by (c.f. [3, Eq. (.6)]) g a = 8π(gγ +), γ = [ π,π] 3 4 dk 3 ( coski )(2π) 3, (.4) where k = (k,k 2,k 3 ) R 3. We refer to Section 2.2 for details. Our main result of this paper is the following. THEOREM. Let E 0 (N u,n d,l) be the ground state energy of H in (.3). If L, N u, N d with u = L N u /L 3 and d = L N d /L 3, then inf L ( ) L 3E 0(N u,n d,l) e 0 ( u, d)+8πa u d o(), (.5) with o() C(a /3 ) /5 for some constant C > 0. Here e 0 ( u, d) is the ground state energy per unit volume of the ideal lattice Fermi gas, and = u + d. As already pointed out in the Introduction, an upper bound of the desired form (.5) was proved by Giuliani in [3], extending the method used in [8]. This shows that Eq. (.5) actually holds as an equality. It is easy to see that e 0 ( u, d) = 3 5 ( 6π 2 ) 2/3 ( 5/3 u + 5/3 d )+O( 7/3 ) (.6) for small. Hence, at fixed a, the expression for the ground state energy of the continuous Fermi gas (.) and the one for the lattice Fermi gas coincide up to terms lower of order o( 2). Theorem is slightly stronger, however, since the error term is o(a 2), not o( 2). Hence (.5) should be viewed as a result for small a /3, which could be achieved either by making small or by making a small. We point out, however, that the case of small a is much simpler than the case of small, since the correct result can be obtained via first order perturbation theory in this case, while this is not possible for fixed a and small. For small a and fixed, the Hartree-Fock approximation becomes exact, as was shown in []. We state and prove Theorem for the simple cubic lattice and zero-range interaction, for simplicity, but the method can be used in more general cases. For 3
4 instance, different lattice structures could be considered, or longer-ranged hopping. Interactions of longer range could also be included, as long as they are non-negative and have a finite scattering length; and particles with more than two spin states could be considered, as in [8]. In combination with the methods developed in [6], our technique can also be applied at non-zero temperature to estimate the pressure or the free energy. The proof of Theorem follows closely the corresponding continuum result in [8], with several important and non-trivial modifications, however. One of the main ingredients is the generalized Dyson Lemma, stated in Lemma below, which allows for the replacement of the hard interaction potential gδ xy by a softer and longer ranged potential, at the expense of the high momentum part of the kinetic energy. The proof of the corresponding Lemma 4 in [8] uses rotational invariance of R 3 in an essential way, and hence does not extend to the lattice case of Z 3, where such a symmetry is absent. (See also the discussion in [3]). Our new Lemma does not rely on this symmetry, however. Another important estimate in [8] that does not carry over to the lattice case is a bound on the average number of particles that are close to their nearest neighbor. The estimate in [8, Lemma 6] uses an inequality by Lieb and Yau [2, Thm. 5] whose proof also relies on the rotational invariance of R 3. In Lemma 4 below we will present a weaker version of this inequality which is equally valid in the lattice case. The strategy of the proof of Theorem is similar to the proof in [8]. First, we separate the Hamiltonian H into two parts, the low momentum part of the kinetic energy on the one hand, and the high momentum part of the kinetic energy together with the interaction energy on the other hand. Thefirstpart is larger than e 0 ( u, d), while the second part can be bounded from below by a softer interaction potential; this is the content of Lemma. In Lemma 2, we shall show that at low density the one particle density matrix of the ground state of the Hubbard model is close to a projection, namely the projection onto the Fermi sea. This information will then be used to prove that the expectation value of the softer interaction potential is given by 8πa u d to leading order. To bound some of the error terms, we need a bound on the expected number of particles whose distance to the nearest neighbor is small. This will be accomplished in Lemma 3. In the next section, we shall state some preinaries and introduce the notation used throughout the proof. Section 3 contains the main three Lemmas, which we have already referred to above. Finally, in Section 4 the proof of Theorem will be given. 2 Preinaries 2. Notation We start by introducing some notation that will be used throughout the proof. First, the gradient operator = (, 2, 3 ) on L 2 (Z 3 ) is defined as usual as ( i f)(x) = f(x+e i ) f(x), 4
5 with e i denoting the unit vector in the i th coordinate direction. Its adjoint is given by ( i f)(x) = f(x e i ) f(x). The Laplacian can then be expressed in terms of the gradient as = =. For any subset A Z 3, we denote by θ A its characteristic function. It will be convenient to introduce the notation [ ] ( θ A θ A + θ A ). s 2 Note that this is a nonnegative operator which plays the role of the (Neumann) Laplacian on A. For A Z 3 bounded, we denote by P A the projection onto the normalized constant function on A, P A θ A θ A θ A 2 2 For h L (Z 3 ), we define the convolution operator C h as (C h ψ)(x) = h ψ(x) = y Z 3 h(x y)ψ(y).. Its adjoint is given by (C h ψ)(x) = y Z3 h(y x)ψ(y). We recall also the natural definition of the Fourier transform, mapping L 2 (Z 3 ) to L 2 ([ π,π] 3 ). For p = (p,p 2,p 3 ) R 3, p i π, ψ(p) = x Z 3 e ip x ψ(x). Its inverse is given by ψ(x) = (2π) 3 e ip x ψ(p)dp. [ π,π] 3 Using the above definitions, the following properties are easily verified: δ x,0 (p) = (2.) ĥ ψ(p) = ĥ(p) ψ(p) ψ 2 2 = ψ ψ = ψ(p) 2 dp [ π,π] 3 (2π) 3 3 ( 2 2cosp j ) ψ(p) 2 dp [ π,π] 3 (2π) 3. j= In particular, if M and M are two functions satisfying M(p) 2 + M (p) 2 = for all p [ π,π] 3, 5
6 we can decompose the Laplacian as = C M C M +C M C M. (2.2) We will use this decomposition in the proof of Theorem in order to separate the kinetic energy into the high momentum and the low momentum parts. Finally, it will be convenient to introduce the operator It has the property that f Ξ A g = Scattering Length Ξ A [ θ A ] s +θ A. (2.3) x A,y/ A x y = [f(x)+f(y)][g(y) g(x)]. (2.4) We denote by ϕ the solution of the zero-energy scattering equation ϕ(x)+ 2 gδ 0,xϕ(x) = 0 (2.5) with boundary condition x ϕ(x) =. It is given by [3, Eq. (.5)] [ π,π]3 e ip x ϕ(x) = 4πa 2 3 j= ( cospj ) dp (2π) 3, (2.6) where a is the scattering length (.4). It can be shown [5] that there is a constant C > 0 such that ϕ(x) + a x C a x 3. (2.7) Note that, in particular, a = x (ϕ(x) ) x. It can be readily checked that ϕ(x) = 2gϕ(0) = 4πa. (2.8) x Z 3 Another property of ϕ we will need is [3, Eq. (.7)] (ϕ(y) ϕ(x)) = 4πa (2.9) x A,y/ A x y = for any simply connected domain A containing the origin. 6
7 2.3 Non-interacting Fermions We recall here briefly the ground state energy of non-interacting (spinless) fermions on the lattice Z 3. For p [ π,π] 3, the dispersion relation will be denoted by E(p) = 2 3 ( cosp i ). For given density 0, the Fermi energy E f ( ) is determined by (2π) 3 dp =. (2.0) E(p) E f ( ) The ground state energy per unit volume in the thermodynamic it is then e( ) = (2π) 3 E(p)dp. E(p) E f ( ) For spin /2 particles with spin-up density u and spin-down density d, the ground state energy is thus e 0 ( u, d) = e( u)+e( d). 3 Auxiliary Lemmas 3. Lemma One As mentioned in the Introduction, Lemma is the main tools of this paper. It is similar to Lemma 4 in [8]. This lemma allows for boundingthe hard interaction gδ 0,x from below by a softer interaction at the expense of the high momentum part of the kinetic energy and some error terms. LEMMA. For r N, let A(r) denote the cube A(r) = [ r,r] 3 Z 3. For any function h L (Z 3 ) satisfying ĥ(p) 0, let f r (x) = max y x+a(r) h (y) h (x), where ĥ (p) = ĥ(p). (3.) For R N, let U, W and V denote the nonnegative operators and U = (2R+) 3 θ A(R), (3.2) W = 6πf R x Z 3 f R (x) (3.3) V = (2R+) 3 [θ A(R) P A(R) ]. (3.4) There exists a constant C > 0 such that for any R C and 0 < ε <, 0 < η <, C h [ θ A(R) ] s C h + g [ 2 δ x,0 4πa ( ε)( η)u W ε CV ]. (3.5) η 7
8 Compared with the result in [8, Lemma 4], there is an additional error term V on the right side of (3.5). There is no restriction that U has to vanish at the origin, however, which was necessary in [8]. We note that the norm of U is given by U = (2R+) 3, which is much smaller than the norm of (g/2)δ x,0 (which is g/2) for our choice of R below. Proof. We are actually going to prove the stronger statement that C h [ Θ ] s C h + g 2 δ x,0 4πa ( ε)( η)u W ψ ε CV η ψ (3.6) for any ψ L 2 (Z 3 ). Here and in the following, we use the shorthand notation ψ = ψ ψ. The non-negative function Θ is defined by Θ = R R R θ A(r), where we denote by R the largest integer less than R/2. Since Θ θ A(R), (3.6) implies (3.5). To prove (3.6), we first define B R as r= e R B R = ψ C h [ Θ ] s ϕ + ψ g 2 δ x,0 ϕ. Here, ϕ is given in (2.6). Using Schwarz s inequality, if follows that B R 2 is bounded from above as B R 2 C h [ Θ ] s C h + g 2 δ x,0 [ Θ ] s + g ψ 2 δ x,0. (3.7) ϕ By the definition of ϕ, [ Θ ] s + g 2 δ x,0 ϕ + g 2 δ x,0 = 4πa. Hence we see ϕ that the left side of (3.6) can be bounded from below as Define χ L 2 (Z 3 ) via C h [ Θ ] s C h + g 2 δ x,0 ψ B R 2 4πa. (3.8) χ = [ Θ ] s ϕ + ϕ = [ Θ ] s ϕ + g 2 δ x,0 ϕ. Alternatively, using (2.3), χ = (R R) R r= R eξ A(r) ϕ. Hence χ is supported in A(R)\A( R 2). Moreover, χ(x) is a non-negative function for R large enough, as can be seen from (2.4) and the asymptotic behavior of ϕ in (2.7). Let also α = [ Θ ] s ϕ. Since α(x) = χ(x) (g/2)δ x,0 ϕ(0), also α is supported on A(R). Moreover, xα(x) = 0 because of (2.8) and (2.9). Since C h +C h =, B R = ψ χ ψ C h α. 8
9 Recall that xα(x) = 0, and α is supported on A(R). Hence (C ( ) h α)(x) = h (y x) h (x) α(y) f R(x) α(y) = 8πaf R (x), y y with f R defined in (3.). Here we used the fact that χ(x) is non-negative and supported away from the origin, hence x α(x) = xχ(x)+gϕ(0)/2 = gϕ(0) = 8πa. In particular, we conclude that B R ψ χ 8πa x Z 3 ψ(x) f R (x). Using Schwarz s inequality and the definition of W in (3.3), we thus obtain B R 2 ( ε) ψ χ χ ψ 4πa2 ε x Z 3 ψ(x) 2 W(x). (3.9) To get a lower bound on χ χ, we use again Schwarz s inequality, as well as the fact that χ is supported on A(R). We obtain, for 0 < η <, χ χ ( η)p A(R) χ χ P A(R) + ( η ) (θ A(R) P A(R) ) χ χ (θ A(R) P A(R) ) ( η)(4πa) 2 P A(R) ( (2R+) 3 + χ 2 2 η ) (θ A(R) P A(R) ). (3.0) Here, we have again used the fact that xχ(x) = 4πa. To conclude the proof, we have to show that χ 2 2 const.a2 /R 3 for large R. This follows from the fact that χ(x) 2 R R sup ϕ(x) ϕ(x+e) Ca/R 3 x R, e = e for large R, as can be seen from the asymptotic behavior (2.7). Inserting the inequalities (3.0) and (3.9) into (3.8), we arrive at the desired result (3.6). If y y 2 > 2 3R, thecubesofsidelength2r centeredaty andy 2, respectively, are disjoint. Hence we can obtain the following corollary of Lemma. COROLLARY. Let U, W and V be as in Lemma, and let U y = T y UT y, W y = T y UT y and V y = T y VT y, where T y is the translation operator (T y ψ)(x) = ψ(x y). If y,...y n satisfy y i y j > 2 3R for all i j, then C h C h + g 2 n δ x,yi 4πa n [ ( ε)( η)u yi W y i ε CV ] y i. (3.) η 9
10 3.2 Lemma Two Recall thatthehilbertspaceh(n u,n d )isthesubspaceofl 2 (Z 3(Nu+N d) )offunctions that are separately antisymmetric in the N u spin-up variables and the N d spin-down variables. For Φ H(N u,n d ), let γ u and γ d denote the reduced one-particle density matrices of Φ for the spin-up and spin-down particles, respectively, with Trγ u = N u and Trγ d = N d. For m Z 3, we define the functions f m (x) L 2 (Z 3 ) as f m (x) = (L+) 3/2 exp ( 2πim x(l+) ) θ [0,L] 3(x). (3.2) Note that the f m s are orthonormal functions. For any function ψ supported on [,L ] 3, the expectation value ψ ψ can be expressed as ψ ψ = For M N, let ξ(m) denote the projection ξ(m) = It is easy to see that m [ L/2,(L+)/2] 3 E(2πm/(L+)) ψ f m 2. (3.3) E(2πm/(L+)) E f (M/(L+) 3 ) f m f m. (3.4) M,L M Trξ(M) = (3.5) in the thermodynamic it L, M with M/L 3 for some 0 <. Let ξ(n u ) = ξ u and ξ(n d ) = ξ d for simplicity. As mentioned in the Introduction, we shall show in Lemma 2 that the reduced one particle density matrix γ u(d) of a ground state Φ of H is close to ξ u(d) in an appropriate sense. LEMMA 2. Let Φ H Nu,N d. Assume that, in the thermodynamic it N u(d), L with u(d) = N u(d) /L 3 fixed, sup L L 3 Φ N u x i N d Φ y i e 0 ( u, d)+ca 2 for some C > 0 independent of a and. Then sup L L 3Tr[γ u(d)( ξ u(d) )] const. (3.6) a /3. (3.7) Proof. The proof is parallel to the proof of Lemma 5 in [8], following an argument in [4]. 0
11 3.3 Lemma Three For given points y...y Nd Z 3, let I R (y,...,y Nd ) denote the number of y i s whose distance to the nearest neighbor is less or equal to 2 3R. Because Corollary can be applied only to those y i s that stay away a distance larger than 2 3R from all the other particles, we will need an upper bound on the expectation value of I R in the ground state of the Hubbard Hamiltonian. This will be accomplished in Lemma 3 below. It states that as long as R is much less than the average particle distance /3, the expectation value of I R in the ground state of H is small compared to the total number of particles N. LEMMA 3. Let Φ H(N u,n d ). Assume that for some constant C > 0, independent of u and d, Φ N d N i Φ C 2/3. (3.8) Then Φ I R (y,...,y Nd ) Φ const.n((r+) 3 ) 2/5. (3.9) Proof. With D i denoting the distance of y i to the nearest neighbor among the y k with k i, we can write N d I R (y,...,y Nd ) = θ [0,2 3R] (D i ). Here, θ [0,2 3R] denotes the characteristic function of [0,2 3R]. It follows from Lemma 4 below that N d N d θ [0,2 3R] (D i ) b yi +b 3/22/2 5π 2N d θ [0,2 3R] ( x ) (3.20) x Z 3 for any b > 0. Using the assumption (3.8) and optimizing over the choice of b, we arrive at the result. It remains to prove the bound (3.20), which is a special case of the following Lemma. Its proof uses a similar decomposition method as in []. LEMMA 4. Let f be nonnegative, with x Z 3 f( x ) <, and let D i denote the distance of x i to the nearest neighbor among all points x j with j i. On the subspace of antisymmetric N-particle wavefunctions in L 2 (Z 3N ), N ( i f(d i )) 2/2 5π 2N x Z 3 f( x ) 5/2. (3.2) Proof. Let N be the largest integer less or equal to N/2, and let N 2 = N N. Consider a partition P = (π,π 2 ) of the integers,...,n into two disjoint subsets with N integers in π and N 2 integers in π 2. For a given P and i π, we define D P i = min{ x i x j,j π 2 }.
12 It is easy to see that N ( ) N f(d i ) 4 f(di P ), N i π where the sum runs over all ( N N ) partitions of {,...,N}. This follows from the fact that for given i and j, the probability that a partition P has the property that i π and j π 2 equals N N 2 /(N(N )) > /4. In particular, we see that N ( N ( f(d i )) N ) P P i π ( N ) i 4f(Di P ). N For fixed x j, j π 2, we can use the Lieb-Thirring estimate [5, Thm. 5.3] to conclude that ( N ) i 4f(Di P ) 8 ( ) 3/2 N N i π 5π 2 4 5/2 f(d P ) 5/2. N x Z 3 Note that the antisymmetry of the wavefunctions is essential here. We can estimate f(d P ) 5/2 N 2 f( x ) 5/2. x Z 3 x Z 3 Using in addition that N 3/2 N 2 N/2 5/2, we arrive at the statement. 4 Proof of Theorem We write the Hamiltonian H in (.3) as N u N u H = xi + 2 g N d N d N u + yi + 2 g N d j= δ xi,y j j= δ xi,y j. (4.) Recall that we restrict H to functions that are antisymmetric both in the x and the y variables, and are supported on the cube [,L ] 3(Nu+Nd). In the following, we are going to derive a lower bound only on the first term. The lower bound on the second term can be obtained in the same way by simply exchanging the role of x and y. Our bound is not a bound on the ground state energy of this first term, however, but rather estimates the expectation value of this term in the ground state of the full Hamiltonian H. First, as mentioned in the Introduction, we decompose the kinetic energy into a high and a low momentum part. Let again E f ( ) denote the Fermi energy of an ideal gas of spinless fermions at density, defined in (2.0), and let [ M(p) = E ] f( u). E(p) + 2
13 Here, [ ] + = max{,0}denotesthepositivepart. Moreover, let M (p) = M(p) 2. As pointed out in Eq. (2.2), we can decompose the Laplacian as We first claim that L = C M C M +C M C M. [ L 3infspec N u ] ( ) C M C M e( u). (4.2) i The proof follows in exactly the same way as the proof of Eq. (64) in [8], using an argument in [6]. We proceed with the high-momentum part. Let l : R 3 R + be a smooth, radial, positive function, with l(p) = 0 for p, l(p) = for p 2, and 0 l(p) in-between. As in [8], we choose ĥs(p) as ĥ s (p) = l(sp). (4.3) Since h s (p) = 0 for p /s, we can estimate [ M(p) 2 = E ] [ ] f( u) E f ( u) ĥ s (p) 2. (4.4) E(p) + min p /s E(p) + (Here, the minimum is taken over p [ π,π] 3, p /s.) In particular, this implies that ] C M C M [ E f ( u) ) ( C C hs min p /s E(p) hs. (4.5) Since E(p) p 2 for small p, and E f ( u) const. 2/3 u, we obtain [ ] E f ( u) const.s 2 2/3 u (4.6) min p /s E(p) + as long as s. We note that with this choice of ĥs(p) the corresponding ĥ s (p) = ĥs(p) is a smooth function that is supported in p 2s. As in [8], we conclude that the corresponding potential W(x) defined in Lemma satisfies (for R const.s) W(x) const. R2 s 5 and + x Z 3 W(x) const. R2 s 2 (4.7) for some constants depending only on the choice of l. Moreover, if y i y j > 2 3R for all i j, then N d W R (x y i ) const. Rs 2 (4.8) independent of x and N d. 3
14 We will now use Corollary to get a lower bound on the sum of the high momentum part of the kinetic energy and the interaction energy. In order to be able to apply this corollary, we have to neglect the interaction of the x particles with those y particles that are not at least a distance 2 3R from the other y particles. Let us denote Y = (y,...,y Nd ), and let Y be the subset of Y containing those y i whose distance to all the other y j s is larger then 2 3R. Note that, by definition, the cardinality of Y is Y = N d I R (y,...,y Nd ), with I R defined in Section 3.3. Moreover, let Y Y be the set of y j Y whose distance to the boundary of [0,L] 3 is at least R+. As argued in [8], Y Y const.(l/r) 2 and hence, in particular, L L 3 Φ ( Y Y ) Φ = 0 (4.9) in the ground state Φ of H. Applying Corollary, together with(4.5), we obtain that for a given configuration of Y, N u [ ] C M C M + g δ xi,y i 2 j with w Y defined as w Y = {j:y j Y } i,j [ ] E f ( u) N u min p /s E(p) + ( 4πa ( ε)( η)u yj W y j ε CV y j η [w Y ] i, (4.0) ). (4.) For any Φ H(N u,n d ), we can express the expectation value of i [w Y] i as N u Φ [w Y ] i Φ = Y Tr[γ Y w Y ], (4.2) Y where we denote by Y the distribution function of Y = (y y Nd ), that is, Y = Φ δ Y ={y...y Nd } Φ and γ Y denotes the one-particle density matrix of Φ for fixed Y, i.e., γ Y (x,x ) = N u Y x 2,...,x Nu Φ(x,x 2,...,x Nu,Y)Φ(x,x 2,...,x Nu,Y). Note that 0 γ Y and Trγ Y = N u. Moreover, Y Y = and Y Yγ Y = γ u, which is the one-particle density matrix for the spin-up particles introduced earlier in Section 3.2. From now on, we will consider Φ to be a ground state of H. The assumptions of Lemma 2 and 3 are clearly satisfied for this Φ, as the upper bound derived in [3] shows. Recall that ξ u denotes the projection ξ(n u ) defined in (3.4). We write w Y = w Y,+ w Y,, where w Y,+ 0 stands for the part of w Y in (4.) containing U, 4
15 whereas w Y, 0 is the part of w Y containing W and V. As proved in [8, Sect. V.C] we have, for any δ > 0, Tr[γ Y w Y ] Tr[ξ u w Y,+ ]( δ) Tr[ξ u w Y, ](+δ) (4.3) ( +δ ) ( w Y,+ + w Y, )Tr[γ Y ( ξ u )] w Y Tr[ξ u ( γ Y )]. We are now going to bound the various terms on the right side of (4.3). First, using x Z 3 U(x) = and the fact that ξ u has a constant density, we have Tr[ξ u w Y,+ ] = Tr[ξ u] (L+) 3( ε)( η)4πa Y. To estimate L L 3 Y YTr[ξ u w Y,+ ], we can use (4.9), Y = N d I R (Y) and Lemma 3 to conclude that L L 3 Y YTr[ξ u w Y,+ ] ( ε)( η)4πa u d const.a 2((R+) 3 ) 2/5. Here, we have also used that L L 3 Tr[ξ u ] = u, which follows from (3.5). Analogously, using (4.7) and the fact that for any ψ and fixed y, ψ V y ψ = 2(2R+) 6 (x,x ) y+a(r) it is easy to get the upper bound L L 3 Y ψ(x) ψ(x ) 2 2 YTr[ξ u w Y, ] const.a u d max (x,x ) y+a(r) ψ(x) ψ(x ) 2, ( ) R 2 R2 2/3 εs 2 +. η Moreover, using (4.8) and the fact that the distance between two y j Y is at least 2 3R, as well as η, we find that, ( w Y w Y,+ + w Y, const.a εs 2 R + ) ηr 3. (4.4) The bound in Lemma 2 implies that L L 3 Y YTr[γ Y ( ξ u )] = L L 3 Tr[γ u ( ξ u )] const. (a 3 ) /6. Finally, the last term in (4.3) can be bounded as L L 3 Y Y w Y Tr[ξ u ( γ Y )] const.a ( εs 2 R + ) ηr 3 (a 3 ) /6, where we have used (4.4) as well as the fact that Tr[ξ u ( γ Y )] = Tr[γ Y ( ξ u )]+ Tr[ξ u γ Y ]. The last term, when averaged over Y, is o(n) in the thermodynamic it, i.e., Y YTr[ξ u γ Y ] = o(n). 5
16 Collecting all the bounds, and applying the same arguments also to the second term in (4.), we arrive at the lower bound L L 3E 0(N u,n d,l) e 0 ( u, d)+8πa u d [ ( ) ε η δ const. s 2 2/3 + R2 R2 2/3 εs 2 + η ( ( const. (R 3 ) 2/5 (a3 ) /6 + δ ηr 3 + ) )] εs 2. R Here, we have assumed that R and that s in order to be able to apply the estimate (4.6). If we choose R = /3 (a 3 ) /30, s = /3 (a 3 ) /90, ε = δ = η = (a 3 ) /45 (4.5) this implies that L ( L 3E 0(N u,n d,l) e 0 ( u, d)+8πa u d const. ( a /3) ) /5, which is the result stated in (.5). Recall that in order to be able to apply Lemma, it is necessary that R C for some constant C > 0, which for our choice of R in (4.5) is the case if ( a /3 ) /0 C /3. (4.6) Under this assumption, also s is satisfied for small a 3. For fixed a, (4.6) holds for small enough. However, if a is very small, (4.6) is violated. In this case, one can obtain our main result (.5) actually much easier. One simply omits the use of Lemma altogether, and applies our perturbative estimate (4.3) directly to the interaction potential (g/2)δ xy. Notice that for small a, g 8πa is also small. The resulting bound is L L 3E 0(N u,n d,l) e 0 ( u, d)+g u d [ ] (a3 ) /6 δ const.. (4.7) δ Choosing δ = /2 (a 3 ) /2 and noting that g 8πa and const.(a 3 ) /0 in the parameter regime we are interested in here, this yields (.5) in case (4.6) is violated. This finishes the proof of Theorem. Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Alessandro Giuliani for helpful discussions and remarks. R.S. acknowledges partial support by U.S. NSF grant PHY and by an A.P. Sloan Fellowship. 6
17 References [] V. Bach, J. Poelchau, Accuracy of the Hartree-Fock approximation for the Hubbard model, J. Math. Phys. 38, (997). [2] F.J. Dyson, Ground State Energy of a Hard-Sphere Gas, Phys. Rev. 06, (957). [3] A. Giuliani, Ground state energy of the low density Hubbard model: An upper bound, J. Math. Phys. 48, (2007). [4] G.M. Graf, J.P. Solovej, A correlation estimate with applications to quantum systems with Coulomb interactions, Rev. Math. Phys. 6, (994). [5] D. Hundertmark, B. Simon, Lieb-Thirring Inequalities For Jacobi Matrices, J. Approx. Theory 8, (2002). [6] P. Li, S.-T. Yau, On the Schrödinger equation and the eigenvalue problem, Commun. Math. Phys. 88, (983). [7] E.H. Lieb, The Hubbard model: Some rigorous results and open problems, in: Proceedings of the XI th International Congress of Mathematical Physics, Paris, 994, D. Iagolnitzer, ed., , International Press (995). [8] E.H. Lieb, R. Seiringer, J.P. Solovej, Ground State Energy of the Low Density Fermi Gas, Phys. Rev. A 7, (2005). [9] E.H. Lieb, R. Seiringer, J.P. Solovej, J. Yngvason, The Mathematics of the Bose Gas and its Condensation, Oberwolfach Seminars, Vol. 34, Birkhäuser (2005). [0] E.H. Lieb, R. Seiringer, J. Yngvason, Bosons in a Trap: A Rigorous Derivation of the Gross-Pitaevskii Energy Functional, Phys. Rev. A 6, (2000). [] E.H. Lieb, W. Thirring, Gravitational collapse in quantum mechanics with relativistic kinetic energy, Ann. Phys. (NY) 55, (984). [2] E.H. Lieb, H.-T. Yau, The Stability and Instability of Relativistic Matter, Commun. Math. Phys. 8, (988). [3] E.H. Lieb, J. Yngvason, Ground State Energy of the Low Density Bose Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, (998). [4] E.H. Lieb, J. Yngvason, Ground State Energy of a Dilute Two-dimensional Bose Gas, J. Stat. Phys. 03, (200). [5] P.G. Martinsson, G. Rodin, Asymptotic expansions of lattice Green s functions, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 458, (2002). [6] R. Seiringer, The Thermodynamic Pressure of a Dilute Fermi Gas, Commun. Math. Phys. 26, (2006). 7
18 [7] R. Seiringer, Free Energy of a Dilute Bose Gas: Lower Bound, preprint math-ph/ , Commun. Math. Phys. (in press). [8] H. Tasaki, The Hubbard model An introduction and selected rigorous results, J. Phys.: Cond. Matter 0, (998). 8
Bose Gases, Bose Einstein Condensation, and the Bogoliubov Approximation
Bose Gases, Bose Einstein Condensation, and the Bogoliubov Approximation Robert Seiringer IST Austria Mathematical Horizons for Quantum Physics IMS Singapore, September 18, 2013 R. Seiringer Bose Gases,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math-ph] 25 Sep 2007
The Lieb-Liniger Model as a Limit of Dilute Bosons in Three Dimensions arxiv:0709.4022v1 [math-ph] 25 Sep 2007 Robert Seiringer and Jun Yin Department of Physics, Jadwin Hall, Princeton University Princeton,
More informationarxiv:math-ph/ v2 4 May 2007
Ground state energy of the low density Hubbard model. An upper bound. Alessandro Giuliani Department of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton 08544 NJ, USA (Dated: January, 08) ariv:math-ph/06034v 4
More informationSuperfluidity & Bogoliubov Theory: Rigorous Results
Superfluidity & Bogoliubov Theory: Rigorous Results Mathieu LEWIN mathieu.lewin@math.cnrs.fr (CNRS & Université Paris-Dauphine) collaborations with P.T. Nam (Vienna), N. Rougerie (Grenoble), B. Schlein
More informationGround-State Energies of Coulomb Systems and Reduced One-Particle Density Matrices
Ground-State Energies of Coulomb Systems and Reduced One-Particle Density Matrices Heinz Siedentop Chennai, August 16, 2010 I. Introduction Atomic Schrödinger operator H N,Z := N n=1 self-adjointly realized
More informationFermi gas model. Introduction to Nuclear Science. Simon Fraser University Spring NUCS 342 February 2, 2011
Fermi gas model Introduction to Nuclear Science Simon Fraser University Spring 2011 NUCS 342 February 2, 2011 NUCS 342 (Lecture 9) February 2, 2011 1 / 34 Outline 1 Bosons and fermions NUCS 342 (Lecture
More informationDerivation of the time dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the dynamics of the Bose-Einstein condensate
Derivation of the time dependent Gross-Pitaevskii equation for the dynamics of the Bose-Einstein condensate László Erdős University of Munich Evian-les-Bains, 2007 June Joint work with B. Schlein and H.T.
More informationValidity of spin wave theory for the quantum Heisenberg model
Validity of spin wave theory for the quantum Heisenberg model Michele Correggi, Alessandro Giuliani, and Robert Seiringer Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica, Università di Roma Tre, L.go S. L. Murialdo,
More informationStability of Relativistic Matter with Magnetic Fields for Nuclear Charges up to the Critical Value
Commun. Math. Phys. 275, 479 489 (2007) Digital Object Identifier (DOI) 10.1007/s00220-007-0307-2 Communications in Mathematical Physics Stability of Relativistic Matter with Magnetic Fields for Nuclear
More informationRelativistic Dirac fermions on one-dimensional lattice
Niodem Szpa DUE, 211-1-2 Relativistic Dirac fermions on one-dimensional lattice Niodem Szpa Universität Duisburg-Essen & Ralf Schützhold Plan: 2 Jan 211 Discretized relativistic Dirac fermions (in an external
More information2D Electrostatics and the Density of Quantum Fluids
2D Electrostatics and the Density of Quantum Fluids Jakob Yngvason, University of Vienna with Elliott H. Lieb, Princeton University and Nicolas Rougerie, University of Grenoble Yerevan, September 5, 2016
More informationOn the quantum Boltzmann equation
On the quantum Boltzmann equation arxiv:math-ph/3234v1 13 Feb 23 László Erdős School of Mathematics, GeorgiaTech Manfred Salmhofer Max-Planck Institute for Mathematics, and Theoretical Physics, University
More informationThe Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet
The Quantum Heisenberg Ferromagnet Soon after Schrödinger discovered the wave equation of quantum mechanics, Heisenberg and Dirac developed the first successful quantum theory of ferromagnetism W. Heisenberg,
More information5.4 Given the basis e 1, e 2 write the matrices that represent the unitary transformations corresponding to the following changes of basis:
5 Representations 5.3 Given a three-dimensional Hilbert space, consider the two observables ξ and η that, with respect to the basis 1, 2, 3, arerepresentedby the matrices: ξ ξ 1 0 0 0 ξ 1 0 0 0 ξ 3, ξ
More informationFinite-dimensional spaces. C n is the space of n-tuples x = (x 1,..., x n ) of complex numbers. It is a Hilbert space with the inner product
Chapter 4 Hilbert Spaces 4.1 Inner Product Spaces Inner Product Space. A complex vector space E is called an inner product space (or a pre-hilbert space, or a unitary space) if there is a mapping (, )
More informationDerivation of Mean-Field Dynamics for Fermions
IST Austria Mathematical Many Body Theory and its Applications Bilbao, June 17, 2016 Derivation = show that solution of microscopic eq. is close to solution of effective eq. (with fewer degrees of freedom)
More informationf lmn x m y n z l m n (1) 3/πz/r and Y 1 ±1 = 3/2π(x±iy)/r, and also gives a formula for Y
Problem Set 6: Group representation theory and neutron stars Graduate Quantum I Physics 6572 James Sethna Due Monday Nov. 12 Last correction at November 14, 2012, 2:32 pm Reading Sakurai and Napolitano,
More informationDesign and realization of exotic quantum phases in atomic gases
Design and realization of exotic quantum phases in atomic gases H.P. Büchler and P. Zoller Theoretische Physik, Universität Innsbruck, Austria Institut für Quantenoptik und Quanteninformation der Österreichischen
More informationNONEXISTENCE OF MINIMIZER FOR THOMAS-FERMI-DIRAC-VON WEIZSÄCKER MODEL. x y
NONEXISTENCE OF MINIMIZER FOR THOMAS-FERMI-DIRAC-VON WEIZSÄCKER MODEL JIANFENG LU AND FELIX OTTO In this paper, we study the following energy functional () E(ϕ) := ϕ 2 + F(ϕ 2 ) dx + D(ϕ 2,ϕ 2 ), R 3 where
More informationRapidly Rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates in Strongly Anharmonic Traps. Michele Correggi. T. Rindler-Daller, J. Yngvason math-ph/
Rapidly Rotating Bose-Einstein Condensates in Strongly Anharmonic Traps Michele Correggi Erwin Schrödinger Institute, Vienna T. Rindler-Daller, J. Yngvason math-ph/0606058 in collaboration with preprint
More informationEffective dynamics of many-body quantum systems
Effective dynamics of many-body quantum systems László Erdős University of Munich Grenoble, May 30, 2006 A l occassion de soixantiéme anniversaire de Yves Colin de Verdiére Joint with B. Schlein and H.-T.
More informationA NEW ESTIMATE ON THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL INDIRECT COULOMB ENERGY
A NEW ESTIMATE ON THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL INDIRECT COULOMB ENERGY RAFAEL D. BENGURIA, PABLO GALLEGOS 2, AND MATĚJ TUŠEK3 Abstract. We prove a new lower bound on the indirect Coulomb energy in two dimensional
More informationFrom many body quantum dynamics to nonlinear dispersive PDE, and back
From many body quantum dynamics to nonlinear dispersive PDE, and back ataša Pavlović (based on joint works with T. Chen, and with T. Chen and. Tzirakis) University of Texas at Austin June 18, 2013 SF-CBMS
More informationON THE UNIQUENESS OF SOLUTIONS TO THE GROSS-PITAEVSKII HIERARCHY. 1. Introduction
ON THE UNIQUENESS OF SOLUTIONS TO THE GROSS-PITAEVSKII HIERARCHY SERGIU KLAINERMAN AND MATEI MACHEDON Abstract. The purpose of this note is to give a new proof of uniqueness of the Gross- Pitaevskii hierarchy,
More informationMean Field Limits for Interacting Bose Gases and the Cauchy Problem for Gross-Pitaevskii Hierarchies. Thomas Chen University of Texas at Austin
Mean Field Limits for Interacting Bose Gases and the Cauchy Problem for Gross-Pitaevskii Hierarchies Thomas Chen University of Texas at Austin Nataša Pavlović University of Texas at Austin Analysis and
More informationSolitons and vortices in Bose-Einstein condensates with finite-range interaction
Solitons and vortices in Bose-Einstein condensates with finite-range interaction Luca Salasnich Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia Galileo Galilei and CNISM, Università di Padova INO-CNR, Research Unit
More informationMicroscopic Derivation of Ginzburg Landau Theory. Mathematics and Quantum Physics
Microscopic Derivation of Ginzburg Landau heory Robert Seiringer IS Austria Joint work with Rupert Frank, Christian Hainzl, and Jan Philip Solovej J. Amer. Math. Soc. 25 (2012), no. 3, 667 713 Mathematics
More informationVALIDITY OF THE SPIN-WAVE APPROXIMATION FOR THE FREE ENERGY OF THE HEISENBERG FERROMAGNET
VALIDITY OF THE SPIN-WAVE APPROXIMATION FOR THE FREE ENERGY OF THE HEISENBERG FERROMAGNET MICHELE CORREGGI, ALESSANDRO GIULIANI, AND ROBERT SEIRINGER Abstract. We consider the quantum ferromagnetic Heisenberg
More informationAPPLICATIONS OF THE THICK DISTRIBUTIONAL CALCULUS
Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 44, No. 2, 2014, 121-135 APPLICATIONS OF THE THICK DISTRIBUTIONAL CALCULUS Ricardo Estrada 1 and Yunyun Yang 2 Abstract. We give several applications of the thick distributional
More informationd 3 r d 3 vf( r, v) = N (2) = CV C = n where n N/V is the total number of molecules per unit volume. Hence e βmv2 /2 d 3 rd 3 v (5)
LECTURE 12 Maxwell Velocity Distribution Suppose we have a dilute gas of molecules, each with mass m. If the gas is dilute enough, we can ignore the interactions between the molecules and the energy will
More informationN polaron systems and mathematics
N polaron systems and mathematics (with R. Frank, E. Lieb, and R. Seiringer) Outline A very brief history of the polaron Lower bounds on the ground state energy for polarons Recent results on the binding
More informationFerromagnetic Ordering of Energy Levels for XXZ Spin Chains
Ferromagnetic Ordering of Energy Levels for XXZ Spin Chains Bruno Nachtergaele and Wolfgang L. Spitzer Department of Mathematics University of California, Davis Davis, CA 95616-8633, USA bxn@math.ucdavis.edu
More informationSELF-ADJOINTNESS OF DIRAC OPERATORS VIA HARDY-DIRAC INEQUALITIES
SELF-ADJOINTNESS OF DIRAC OPERATORS VIA HARDY-DIRAC INEQUALITIES MARIA J. ESTEBAN 1 AND MICHAEL LOSS Abstract. Distinguished selfadjoint extension of Dirac operators are constructed for a class of potentials
More informationAttempts at relativistic QM
Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics should incorporate both quantum mechanics and special relativity. However historically combining quantum mechanics and
More informationPart A - Comments on the papers of Burovski et al. Part B - On Superfluid Properties of Asymmetric Dilute Fermi Systems
Part A - Comments on the papers of Burovski et al. Part B - On Superfluid Properties of Asymmetric Dilute Fermi Systems Part A Comments on papers of E. Burovski,, N. Prokof ev ev,, B. Svistunov and M.
More informationThe method of stationary phase
Chapter The method of stationary phase In this chapter we introduce a very useful analytical tool which will allow us to find asymptotic expansions for integrals that cannot, in many cases, be calculated
More informationThe correlation energy of charged quantum systems. Jan Philip Solovej University of Copenhagen
The correlation energy of charged quantum systems Jan Philip Solovej University of Copenhagen Workshop on Quantum Spectra and Dynamics Israel, June 28 - July 5, 2000 1 Quantum Mechanics of charged Particles
More informationHilbert Spaces. Hilbert space is a vector space with some extra structure. We start with formal (axiomatic) definition of a vector space.
Hilbert Spaces Hilbert space is a vector space with some extra structure. We start with formal (axiomatic) definition of a vector space. Vector Space. Vector space, ν, over the field of complex numbers,
More information-state problems and an application to the free particle
-state problems and an application to the free particle Sourendu Gupta TIFR, Mumbai, India Quantum Mechanics 1 2013 3 September, 2013 Outline 1 Outline 2 The Hilbert space 3 A free particle 4 Keywords
More informationRichard F. Bass Krzysztof Burdzy University of Washington
ON DOMAIN MONOTONICITY OF THE NEUMANN HEAT KERNEL Richard F. Bass Krzysztof Burdzy University of Washington Abstract. Some examples are given of convex domains for which domain monotonicity of the Neumann
More informationCHAPTER 4. Cluster expansions
CHAPTER 4 Cluster expansions The method of cluster expansions allows to write the grand-canonical thermodynamic potential as a convergent perturbation series, where the small parameter is related to the
More information2. Function spaces and approximation
2.1 2. Function spaces and approximation 2.1. The space of test functions. Notation and prerequisites are collected in Appendix A. Let Ω be an open subset of R n. The space C0 (Ω), consisting of the C
More informationA Perron-type theorem on the principal eigenvalue of nonsymmetric elliptic operators
A Perron-type theorem on the principal eigenvalue of nonsymmetric elliptic operators Lei Ni And I cherish more than anything else the Analogies, my most trustworthy masters. They know all the secrets of
More informationSome Correlation Inequalities for Ising Antiferromagnets
Some Correlation Inequalities for Ising Antiferromagnets David Klein Wei-Shih Yang Department of Mathematics Department of Mathematics California State University University of Colorado Northridge, California
More informationAnderson Localization on the Sierpinski Gasket
Anderson Localization on the Sierpinski Gasket G. Mograby 1 M. Zhang 2 1 Department of Physics Technical University of Berlin, Germany 2 Department of Mathematics Jacobs University, Germany 5th Cornell
More informationHeisenberg s inequality
Heisenberg s inequality Michael Walter 1 Introduction 1 Definition. Let P be a probability measure on R. Then its mean or expectation is defined as E(P) := x dp(x) Its variance is the expected square deviation
More informationIncompressibility Estimates in the Laughlin Phase
Incompressibility Estimates in the Laughlin Phase Jakob Yngvason, University of Vienna with Nicolas Rougerie, University of Grenoble ESI, September 8, 2014 Jakob Yngvason (Uni Vienna) Incompressibility
More informationEIGENFUNCTIONS OF DIRAC OPERATORS AT THE THRESHOLD ENERGIES
EIGENFUNCTIONS OF DIRAC OPERATORS AT THE THRESHOLD ENERGIES TOMIO UMEDA Abstract. We show that the eigenspaces of the Dirac operator H = α (D A(x)) + mβ at the threshold energies ±m are coincide with the
More informationLocal Density Approximation for the Almost-bosonic Anyon Gas. Michele Correggi
Local Density Approximation for the Almost-bosonic Anyon Gas Michele Correggi Università degli Studi Roma Tre www.cond-math.it QMATH13 Many-body Systems and Statistical Mechanics joint work with D. Lundholm
More informationHOPF S DECOMPOSITION AND RECURRENT SEMIGROUPS. Josef Teichmann
HOPF S DECOMPOSITION AND RECURRENT SEMIGROUPS Josef Teichmann Abstract. Some results of ergodic theory are generalized in the setting of Banach lattices, namely Hopf s maximal ergodic inequality and the
More informationKernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels
Kernel Method: Data Analysis with Positive Definite Kernels 2. Positive Definite Kernel and Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space Kenji Fukumizu The Institute of Statistical Mathematics. Graduate University
More informationLaplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas
Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic
More informationLecture 5. Hartree-Fock Theory. WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics
Lecture 5 Hartree-Fock Theory WS2010/11: Introduction to Nuclear and Particle Physics Particle-number representation: General formalism The simplest starting point for a many-body state is a system of
More informationPhysics 239/139 Spring 2018 Assignment 2 Solutions
University of California at San Diego Department of Physics Prof. John McGreevy Physics 39/139 Spring 018 Assignment Solutions Due 1:30pm Monday, April 16, 018 1. Classical circuits brain-warmer. (a) Show
More informationBrief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM)
Brief review of Quantum Mechanics (QM) Note: This is a collection of several formulae and facts that we will use throughout the course. It is by no means a complete discussion of QM, nor will I attempt
More information1 Directional Derivatives and Differentiability
Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1 Directional Derivatives and Differentiability Let E R N, let f : E R and let x 0 E. Given a direction v R N, let L be the line through x 0 in the direction v, that is, L :=
More informationSeparation of Variables in Linear PDE: One-Dimensional Problems
Separation of Variables in Linear PDE: One-Dimensional Problems Now we apply the theory of Hilbert spaces to linear differential equations with partial derivatives (PDE). We start with a particular example,
More informationSecond quantization (the occupation-number representation)
Second quantization (the occupation-number representation) February 14, 2013 1 Systems of identical particles 1.1 Particle statistics In physics we are often interested in systems consisting of many identical
More informationand finally, any second order divergence form elliptic operator
Supporting Information: Mathematical proofs Preliminaries Let be an arbitrary bounded open set in R n and let L be any elliptic differential operator associated to a symmetric positive bilinear form B
More informationPhysics 127c: Statistical Mechanics. Application of Path Integrals to Superfluidity in He 4
Physics 17c: Statistical Mechanics Application of Path Integrals to Superfluidity in He 4 The path integral method, and its recent implementation using quantum Monte Carlo methods, provides both an intuitive
More informationPIECEWISE LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT METHODS ARE NOT LOCALIZED
PIECEWISE LINEAR FINITE ELEMENT METHODS ARE NOT LOCALIZED ALAN DEMLOW Abstract. Recent results of Schatz show that standard Galerkin finite element methods employing piecewise polynomial elements of degree
More informationPHYS3113, 3d year Statistical Mechanics Tutorial problems. Tutorial 1, Microcanonical, Canonical and Grand Canonical Distributions
1 PHYS3113, 3d year Statistical Mechanics Tutorial problems Tutorial 1, Microcanonical, Canonical and Grand Canonical Distributions Problem 1 The macrostate probability in an ensemble of N spins 1/2 is
More informationBose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices: mathematical analysis and analytical approximate formulas
0.5 setgray0 0.5 setgray1 Bose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices: mathematical analysis and analytical approximate formulas IV EBED João Pessoa - 2011 Rolci Cipolatti Instituto de Matemática - UFRJ
More informationFrom the N-body problem to the cubic NLS equation
From the N-body problem to the cubic NLS equation François Golse Université Paris 7 & Laboratoire J.-L. Lions golse@math.jussieu.fr Los Alamos CNLS, January 26th, 2005 Formal derivation by N.N. Bogolyubov
More informationarxiv: v3 [math-ph] 19 Oct 2017
ABSECE OF A GROUD STATE FOR BOSOIC COULOMB SYSTEMS WITH CRITICAL CHARGE YUKIMI GOTO arxiv:1605.02949v3 [math-ph] 19 Oct 2017 Abstract. We consider bosonic Coulomb systems with -particles and K static nuclei.
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationUNIQUENESS OF POSITIVE SOLUTION TO SOME COUPLED COOPERATIVE VARIATIONAL ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS
TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 00, Number 0, Pages 000 000 S 0002-9947(XX)0000-0 UNIQUENESS OF POSITIVE SOLUTION TO SOME COUPLED COOPERATIVE VARIATIONAL ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS YULIAN
More informationRANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER
RANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER. Quasilinear problems In general, one consider the following trichotomy for nonlinear PDEs: A semilinear problem is a problem where the highest-order terms appears linearly
More informationarxiv: v2 [math-ph] 18 Mar 2010
Bounds on Diatomic Molecules in a Relativistic Model Natalie Gilka Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Abstract We consider diatomic
More informationInteracting Fermi Gases
Interacting Fermi Gases Mike Hermele (Dated: February 11, 010) Notes on Interacting Fermi Gas for Physics 7450, Spring 010 I. FERMI GAS WITH DELTA-FUNCTION INTERACTION Since it is easier to illustrate
More informationLOCALIZATION OF RELATIVE ENTROPY IN BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION OF TRAPPED INTERACTING BOSONS
LOCALIZATION OF RELATIVE ENTROPY IN BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION OF TRAPPED INTERACTING BOSONS LAURA M. MORATO 1 AND STEFANIA UGOLINI 2 1 Facoltà di Scienze, Università di Verona, Strada le Grazie, 37134
More informationQuantum Field Theory
Quantum Field Theory PHYS-P 621 Radovan Dermisek, Indiana University Notes based on: M. Srednicki, Quantum Field Theory 1 Attempts at relativistic QM based on S-1 A proper description of particle physics
More informationA LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE. 1.
A LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE THOMAS CHEN AND NATAŠA PAVLOVIĆ Abstract. We prove a Beale-Kato-Majda criterion
More informationThis operator has a kernel that can calculated. In one dimension it is given by. ( 2 + E) 1 (x, y) = 1 2. E e. 1 e E x y
The Birman-Schwinger Prinicple All the proofs of the general inequalities involve in one way or another the Birman- Schwinger principle. To state, we shall from now consider only negative potentials of
More information1 Mathematical preliminaries
1 Mathematical preliminaries The mathematical language of quantum mechanics is that of vector spaces and linear algebra. In this preliminary section, we will collect the various definitions and mathematical
More informationA NEW PROOF OF EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS FOR FOCUSING AND DEFOCUSING GROSS-PITAEVSKII HIERARCHIES. 1. Introduction
A EW PROOF OF EXISTECE OF SOLUTIOS FOR FOCUSIG AD DEFOCUSIG GROSS-PITAEVSKII HIERARCHIES THOMAS CHE AD ATAŠA PAVLOVIĆ Abstract. We consider the cubic and quintic Gross-Pitaevskii (GP) hierarchies in d
More informationarxiv:cond-mat/ v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 2 Aug 2004
Ground state energy of a homogeneous Bose-Einstein condensate beyond Bogoliubov Christoph Weiss and André Eckardt Institut für Physik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, D-6 Oldenburg, Germany (Dated: November
More informationStatistical Convergence of Kernel CCA
Statistical Convergence of Kernel CCA Kenji Fukumizu Institute of Statistical Mathematics Tokyo 106-8569 Japan fukumizu@ism.ac.jp Francis R. Bach Centre de Morphologie Mathematique Ecole des Mines de Paris,
More informationThe Gutzwiller Density Functional Theory
The Gutzwiller Density Functional Theory Jörg Bünemann, BTU Cottbus I) Introduction 1. Model for an H 2 -molecule 2. Transition metals and their compounds II) Gutzwiller variational theory 1. Gutzwiller
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 3 Nov 2014
SPARSE MATRICES DESCRIBING ITERATIONS OF INTEGER-VALUED FUNCTIONS BERND C. KELLNER arxiv:1411.0590v1 [math.co] 3 Nov 014 Abstract. We consider iterations of integer-valued functions φ, which have no fixed
More informationChemistry 120A 2nd Midterm. 1. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (1-electron):
April 6th, 24 Chemistry 2A 2nd Midterm. (36 pts) For this question, recall the energy levels of the Hydrogenic Hamiltonian (-electron): E n = m e Z 2 e 4 /2 2 n 2 = E Z 2 /n 2, n =, 2, 3,... where Ze is
More informationPhysics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 27 The Variational Method
Copyright c 2018 by Robert G. Littlejohn Physics 221A Fall 2017 Notes 27 The Variational Method 1. Introduction Very few realistic problems in quantum mechanics are exactly solvable, so approximation methods
More informationElectrons in a periodic potential
Chapter 3 Electrons in a periodic potential 3.1 Bloch s theorem. We consider in this chapter electrons under the influence of a static, periodic potential V (x), i.e. such that it fulfills V (x) = V (x
More informationPreface Introduction to the electron liquid
Table of Preface page xvii 1 Introduction to the electron liquid 1 1.1 A tale of many electrons 1 1.2 Where the electrons roam: physical realizations of the electron liquid 5 1.2.1 Three dimensions 5 1.2.2
More informationNewtonian Mechanics. Chapter Classical space-time
Chapter 1 Newtonian Mechanics In these notes classical mechanics will be viewed as a mathematical model for the description of physical systems consisting of a certain (generally finite) number of particles
More informationInequalities for Schrödinger Operators and Applications to the Stability of Matter Problem
Contemporary Mathematics Inequalities for Schrödinger Operators and Applications to the Stability of Matter Problem Robert Seiringer Abstract. We review various inequalities for Schrödinger operators and
More informationDiagonalization by a unitary similarity transformation
Physics 116A Winter 2011 Diagonalization by a unitary similarity transformation In these notes, we will always assume that the vector space V is a complex n-dimensional space 1 Introduction A semi-simple
More informationSection 10: Many Particle Quantum Mechanics Solutions
Physics 143a: Quantum Mechanics I Section 10: Many Particle Quantum Mechanics Solutions Spring 015, Harvard Here is a summary of the most important points from this week (with a few of my own tidbits),
More informationOblique derivative problems for elliptic and parabolic equations, Lecture II
of the for elliptic and parabolic equations, Lecture II Iowa State University July 22, 2011 of the 1 2 of the of the As a preliminary step in our further we now look at a special situation for elliptic.
More informationON THE SPECTRUM OF THE DIRICHLET LAPLACIAN IN A NARROW STRIP
ON THE SPECTRUM OF THE DIRICHLET LAPLACIAN IN A NARROW STRIP LEONID FRIEDLANDER AND MICHAEL SOLOMYAK Abstract. We consider the Dirichlet Laplacian in a family of bounded domains { a < x < b, 0 < y < h(x)}.
More informationElectrons in periodic potential
Chapter 9 Electrons in periodic potential The computation of electronic states in a solid is a nontrivial problem. A great simplification can be achieved if the solid is a crystal, i.e. if it can be described
More informationON THE REMOVAL OF FINITE DISCRETE SPECTRUM BY COEFFICIENT STRIPPING
ON THE REMOVAL OF FINITE DISCRETE SPECTRUM BY COEFFICIENT STRIPPING BARRY SIMON Abstract. We prove for a large class of operators, J, including block Jacobi matrices, if σ(j) \ [α, β] is a finite set,
More informationRepresentations of Sp(6,R) and SU(3) carried by homogeneous polynomials
Representations of Sp(6,R) and SU(3) carried by homogeneous polynomials Govindan Rangarajan a) Department of Mathematics and Centre for Theoretical Studies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012,
More informationEXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018
EXPOSITORY NOTES ON DISTRIBUTION THEORY, FALL 2018 While these notes are under construction, I expect there will be many typos. The main reference for this is volume 1 of Hörmander, The analysis of liner
More informationThe AKLT Model. Lecture 5. Amanda Young. Mathematics, UC Davis. MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/31/11
1 The AKLT Model Lecture 5 Amanda Young Mathematics, UC Davis MAT290-25, CRN 30216, Winter 2011, 01/31/11 This talk will follow pg. 26-29 of Lieb-Robinson Bounds in Quantum Many-Body Physics by B. Nachtergaele
More informationRepresentation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom
Representation theory and quantum mechanics tutorial Spin and the hydrogen atom Justin Campbell August 3, 2017 1 Representations of SU 2 and SO 3 (R) 1.1 The following observation is long overdue. Proposition
More informationSchrödinger equation for central potentials
Chapter 2 Schrödinger equation for central potentials In this chapter we will extend the concepts and methods introduced in the previous chapter for a one-dimensional problem to a specific and very important
More informationPLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send to
Teoretisk Fysik KTH Advanced QM (SI2380), Lecture 2 (Summary of concepts) 1 PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU FIND TYPOS (send email to langmann@kth.se) The laws of QM 1. I now discuss the laws of QM and their
More informationThe following definition is fundamental.
1. Some Basics from Linear Algebra With these notes, I will try and clarify certain topics that I only quickly mention in class. First and foremost, I will assume that you are familiar with many basic
More information