Lecture 3: the classification of equivalence relations and the definition of a topological space

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Lecture 3: the classification of equivalence relations and the definition of a topological space"

Transcription

1 Lecture 3: the classification of equivalence relations and the definition of a topological space Saul Glasman September 12, 2016 If there s a bijection f : X Y, we ll often say that X and Y are in bijection, and we ll act kind of as if X and Y are the same, since the elements of Y are in one-to-one correspondence with the elements of X; they re just the elements of X under different names. Now on the first day I promised a result on equivalence relations; today I ll be able to give the statement and the proof. After that, we ll get started on topological spaces. Let X be a set. We can form the set of all equivalence relations on X - equivalence relations are things, we can put them in a set. Call this set Eq(X). Definition 1. A partition of X is a collection (X i ) i I of subsets of X such that if i j, then X i X j =, and the union X i = X. i I In other words, each x X is in exactly one of the X i. Don t be scared of the notation (X i ) i I ; the point is that we have a big list of subsets of X, and we have to give them names, so we index them with tags from some convenient index set I. It doesn t matter exactly what I is; it just has to be the right size of set to index our collection. Now we can form the set of all partitions of X - call it Part(X). Then we have the following theorem: Theorem 2. The sets Eq(X) and Part(X) are in bijection. Remark 3. I m showing you this theorem partly because it s interesting, and partly to demonstrate that set theory can get meta : questions about the nature of sets can themselves be treated using set theory. This theorem and its proof will serve as a warm-up for the kind of level of abstraction we ll be encountering in this course. 1

2 Proof. In view of the theorem I proved last time, if I claim two sets are in bijection, there are two ways I can prove that: I can give a function one way and show that it s injective and surjective, or I can give functions both ways and show they re inverse to one another. Here we ll do the latter. First I ll prove some auxiliary results. If R is an equivalence relation on X and x X, then the equivalence class of x, EC R (x) X is defined as the set of x X such that xrx. Lemma 4. If xrx, then EC R (x ) = EC R (x). Proof. Suppose z EC R (x). Then xrx and x Rz. By transitivity, which was one of our axioms for equivalence relations, xrz. We deduce that EC R (x ) EC R (x). But by symmetry, which was another of our axioms, we have x Rx. So the same reasoning shows that EC R (x) EC R (x ). Each subset is included in the other, so the two must be equal. by Now let s define φ : Eq(X) Part(X) φ(r) = {EC R (x) x X}. Notice we ve overcounted a lot here: each equivalence class is counted separately for each element of that equivalence class. But that doesn t matter. We first have to prove that φ(r) is really a partition; otherwise the codomain of φ isn t what I claimed it is. That is, we have to show that each element x X is in exactly one equivalence class. But if an equivalence class C contains x, then by the lemma, C must be the equivalence class of x, so x is in at most one equivalence class. Since xrx, x is in its own equivalence class. We deduce that x is in exactly one equivalence class, and φ(r) is really a partition. Now define ψ : Part(X) Eq(X) by setting, for a partition ψ(p) = R P, where P = {(X i ) i I } xr P x if x X i, x X i for some i. Now we have to show that R P is an equivalence relation. But I actually gave this proof last week when I proved that landmasses give an equivalence relation! So I ll omit this in lecture, and for those of you who weren t here on the first day I ll leave it as an exercise, but for completeness, I ll give it here. 2

3 1. Each x is in some partition X i. So xr P x. 2. If x X i, y X i, and y X j, z X j, then i = j, because P is a partition. But then z X i, so xr P z. 3. If x X i, y X i, then y X i, x X i. So now we have our well-defined functions and φ : Eq(X) Part(X) ψ : Part(X) Eq(X). We ll now show that φ and ψ are mutually inverse. This is actually really clear, once you unpack the notation, but I ll go through it for completeness. First, let s show that ψ φ = id. (I ll stop writing the subscript on id when the context is clear.) This is the same as saying that by taking the equivalence relation associated to the equivalences classes, you get the same equivalence relation - that is, xrx if and only if they re in the same equivalence class for R. That, we already know. Now let s show that φ ψ = id. This is the same as saying that the equivalence classes for the equivalence relation associated to a partition are exactly the sets of that partition - that is, x and x are in the same equivalence class for ψ(p) if and only if there is some X i for which both x X i, x X i. This, too, we know; it s just the definition of ψ. So we re done! Finally. I apologize for the tedium and the length of the proof, but hopefully each step was clear individually. If you didn t follow the overall structure of the proof, I highly recommend you look over it in the notes; there will be plenty of proofs in the course which are at least this complicated. Now let s really begin the course! This subject truly starts with the definition of a topological space, and that s what we re about to cover. First a little bit of background. Topology grew out of the study of continuous functions. You ve probably encountered the definition of a continuous function from R to R using δs and ɛs (if not, don t worry, you will soon.) This definition is fine, but it does rely on the real numbers having a well-defined notion of distance - that is, the absolute difference between two real numbers. As mathematics grew in abstraction, the need for an idea of continuity that would generalize to contexts where notions of distance were unavailable or irrelevant became clear. The crucial insight was that the definition of continuity could be reformulated in terms of open sets - we ll see how this works within the next few classes. This led to an abstract, set-theoretic definition of topological space making reference only to a class of open sets. Before giving this definition, let me informally set up some intuition about what an open set should be in the context of R. I m not going to give you the precise definition of an open set just yet. Loosely speaking, an open set is a set 3

4 without any sharp edges - a set you can t cut yourself on. The archetypal example of an open set is the open interval (a, b) = {x R a < x < b}. Another example of an open set is the entire set R. Sets which are not open include the half-open interval (a, b] = {x R a < x b}, which has one sharp edge, and the closed interval [a, b] = {x R a x b}, which has two sharp edges. With this in mind, let s get to the definition of a topology: Definition 5. Let X be a set. A topology on X is a collection T of subsets of X, known as open sets satisfying the following conditions: 1. T. 2. X T. 3. Any union of elements of T is in T. 4. A finite intersection of elements of T is in T. Why do we allow arbitrary unions but only finite intersections? Consider the following example: If n is a positive integer, let I n R be the open interval (0, n ). Now let s take the intersection of all of these open sets: I = I n. n=1 What are the elements of I? Well, they re the real numbers which are greater than 0 but which are less than 1 + 1/n for all n. So certainly, Also, 1 I. But if r > 1 - say (0, 1) I. r = then there s some n such that r > 1 + 1/n, right? So I = (0, 1]. Oops - that s not open any more. If we d only taken a finite intersection, though, it would have been fine. 4

5 So that s the definition of a topology. The pair (X, T ) is called a topological space. Let s give a few easy examples. Example 6. Let X be a set. Then the discrete topology on X is the set of all subsets of X: T = P(X) (P(X) is the notation for the set of all subsets of X; it s called the power set, in case you didn t know.) It s clear that the discrete topology satisfies the axioms for a topology. Example 7. Let X be a set. Then the indiscrete topology on X is the topology for which only and X are open: T = {, X}. Again, it s clear that the indiscrete topology satisfies the axioms for a topology: the only nontrivial collection of elements of T is {, X}, and X = X, X =. Let s give the definition of an open subset of R. Definition 8. Let U R. We say U is open if for every r U, r is contained in an open interval which is contained in U; that is, for every r in U, there are positive numbers ɛ 0, ɛ 1 > 0 such that (r ɛ 0, r + ɛ 1 ) U. Proposition 9. With this definition, the open subsets of R form a topology on R. We ll deduce this result as a special case of a more general theorem next time. 5

Lecture 5: closed sets, and an introduction to continuous functions

Lecture 5: closed sets, and an introduction to continuous functions Lecture 5: closed sets, and an introduction to continuous functions Saul Glasman September 16, 2016 Clarification on URL. To warm up today, let s talk about one more example of a topology. Definition 1.

More information

Seminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010)

Seminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010) http://math.sun.ac.za/amsc/sam Seminaar Abstrakte Wiskunde Seminar in Abstract Mathematics 2009-2010 Lecture notes in progress (27 March 2010) Contents 2009 Semester I: Elements 5 1. Cartesian product

More information

Cosets and Lagrange s theorem

Cosets and Lagrange s theorem Cosets and Lagrange s theorem These are notes on cosets and Lagrange s theorem some of which may already have been lecturer. There are some questions for you included in the text. You should write the

More information

Commutative Algebra MAS439 Lecture 3: Subrings

Commutative Algebra MAS439 Lecture 3: Subrings Commutative Algebra MAS439 Lecture 3: Subrings Paul Johnson paul.johnson@sheffield.ac.uk Hicks J06b October 4th Plan: slow down a little Last week - Didn t finish Course policies + philosophy Sections

More information

Lecture 4: Constructing the Integers, Rationals and Reals

Lecture 4: Constructing the Integers, Rationals and Reals Math/CS 20: Intro. to Math Professor: Padraic Bartlett Lecture 4: Constructing the Integers, Rationals and Reals Week 5 UCSB 204 The Integers Normally, using the natural numbers, you can easily define

More information

MA554 Assessment 1 Cosets and Lagrange s theorem

MA554 Assessment 1 Cosets and Lagrange s theorem MA554 Assessment 1 Cosets and Lagrange s theorem These are notes on cosets and Lagrange s theorem; they go over some material from the lectures again, and they have some new material it is all examinable,

More information

Metric spaces and metrizability

Metric spaces and metrizability 1 Motivation Metric spaces and metrizability By this point in the course, this section should not need much in the way of motivation. From the very beginning, we have talked about R n usual and how relatively

More information

Lecture 3: Sizes of Infinity

Lecture 3: Sizes of Infinity Math/CS 20: Intro. to Math Professor: Padraic Bartlett Lecture 3: Sizes of Infinity Week 2 UCSB 204 Sizes of Infinity On one hand, we know that the real numbers contain more elements than the rational

More information

Sequence convergence, the weak T-axioms, and first countability

Sequence convergence, the weak T-axioms, and first countability Sequence convergence, the weak T-axioms, and first countability 1 Motivation Up to now we have been mentioning the notion of sequence convergence without actually defining it. So in this section we will

More information

Reading 11 : Relations and Functions

Reading 11 : Relations and Functions CS/Math 240: Introduction to Discrete Mathematics Fall 2015 Reading 11 : Relations and Functions Instructor: Beck Hasti and Gautam Prakriya In reading 3, we described a correspondence between predicates

More information

6 Cosets & Factor Groups

6 Cosets & Factor Groups 6 Cosets & Factor Groups The course becomes markedly more abstract at this point. Our primary goal is to break apart a group into subsets such that the set of subsets inherits a natural group structure.

More information

UMASS AMHERST MATH 300 SP 05, F. HAJIR HOMEWORK 8: (EQUIVALENCE) RELATIONS AND PARTITIONS

UMASS AMHERST MATH 300 SP 05, F. HAJIR HOMEWORK 8: (EQUIVALENCE) RELATIONS AND PARTITIONS UMASS AMHERST MATH 300 SP 05, F. HAJIR HOMEWORK 8: (EQUIVALENCE) RELATIONS AND PARTITIONS 1. Relations Recall the concept of a function f from a source set X to a target set Y. It is a rule for mapping

More information

CONSTRUCTION OF THE REAL NUMBERS.

CONSTRUCTION OF THE REAL NUMBERS. CONSTRUCTION OF THE REAL NUMBERS. IAN KIMING 1. Motivation. It will not come as a big surprise to anyone when I say that we need the real numbers in mathematics. More to the point, we need to be able to

More information

Guide to Proofs on Discrete Structures

Guide to Proofs on Discrete Structures CS103 Handout 17 Spring 2018 Guide to Proofs on Discrete Structures In Problem Set One, you got practice with the art of proofwriting in general (as applied to numbers, sets, puzzles, etc.) Problem Set

More information

1 Take-home exam and final exam study guide

1 Take-home exam and final exam study guide Math 215 - Introduction to Advanced Mathematics Fall 2013 1 Take-home exam and final exam study guide 1.1 Problems The following are some problems, some of which will appear on the final exam. 1.1.1 Number

More information

2 Metric Spaces Definitions Exotic Examples... 3

2 Metric Spaces Definitions Exotic Examples... 3 Contents 1 Vector Spaces and Norms 1 2 Metric Spaces 2 2.1 Definitions.......................................... 2 2.2 Exotic Examples...................................... 3 3 Topologies 4 3.1 Open Sets..........................................

More information

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURES NOTES 5: SUBGROUPS, CONJUGACY, NORMALITY, QUOTIENT GROUPS, AND EXTENSIONS.

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURES NOTES 5: SUBGROUPS, CONJUGACY, NORMALITY, QUOTIENT GROUPS, AND EXTENSIONS. ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURES NOTES 5: SUBGROUPS, CONJUGACY, NORMALITY, QUOTIENT GROUPS, AND EXTENSIONS. ANDREW SALCH 1. Subgroups, conjugacy, normality. I think you already know what a subgroup is: Definition

More information

2.23 Theorem. Let A and B be sets in a metric space. If A B, then L(A) L(B).

2.23 Theorem. Let A and B be sets in a metric space. If A B, then L(A) L(B). 2.23 Theorem. Let A and B be sets in a metric space. If A B, then L(A) L(B). 2.24 Theorem. Let A and B be sets in a metric space. Then L(A B) = L(A) L(B). It is worth noting that you can t replace union

More information

EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS (NOTES FOR STUDENTS) 1. RELATIONS

EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS (NOTES FOR STUDENTS) 1. RELATIONS EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS (NOTES FOR STUDENTS) LIOR SILBERMAN Version 1.0 compiled September 9, 2015. 1.1. List of examples. 1. RELATIONS Equality of real numbers: for some x,y R we have x = y. For other pairs

More information

We have been going places in the car of calculus for years, but this analysis course is about how the car actually works.

We have been going places in the car of calculus for years, but this analysis course is about how the car actually works. Analysis I We have been going places in the car of calculus for years, but this analysis course is about how the car actually works. Copier s Message These notes may contain errors. In fact, they almost

More information

Connectedness. Proposition 2.2. The following are equivalent for a topological space (X, T ).

Connectedness. Proposition 2.2. The following are equivalent for a topological space (X, T ). Connectedness 1 Motivation Connectedness is the sort of topological property that students love. Its definition is intuitive and easy to understand, and it is a powerful tool in proofs of well-known results.

More information

Writing proofs for MATH 51H Section 2: Set theory, proofs of existential statements, proofs of uniqueness statements, proof by cases

Writing proofs for MATH 51H Section 2: Set theory, proofs of existential statements, proofs of uniqueness statements, proof by cases Writing proofs for MATH 51H Section 2: Set theory, proofs of existential statements, proofs of uniqueness statements, proof by cases September 22, 2018 Recall from last week that the purpose of a proof

More information

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2

FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2 FOUNDATIONS OF ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY CLASS 2 RAVI VAKIL CONTENTS 1. Where we were 1 2. Yoneda s lemma 2 3. Limits and colimits 6 4. Adjoints 8 First, some bureaucratic details. We will move to 380-F for Monday

More information

Functions and cardinality (solutions) sections A and F TA: Clive Newstead 6 th May 2014

Functions and cardinality (solutions) sections A and F TA: Clive Newstead 6 th May 2014 Functions and cardinality (solutions) 21-127 sections A and F TA: Clive Newstead 6 th May 2014 What follows is a somewhat hastily written collection of solutions for my review sheet. I have omitted some

More information

Counting Colorings Cleverly

Counting Colorings Cleverly Counting Colorings Cleverly by Zev Chonoles How many ways are there to color a shape? Of course, the answer depends on the number of colors we re allowed to use. More fundamentally, the answer depends

More information

Lecture 3: Latin Squares and Groups

Lecture 3: Latin Squares and Groups Latin Squares Instructor: Padraic Bartlett Lecture 3: Latin Squares and Groups Week 2 Mathcamp 2012 In our last lecture, we came up with some fairly surprising connections between finite fields and Latin

More information

Handout 2 (Correction of Handout 1 plus continued discussion/hw) Comments and Homework in Chapter 1

Handout 2 (Correction of Handout 1 plus continued discussion/hw) Comments and Homework in Chapter 1 22M:132 Fall 07 J. Simon Handout 2 (Correction of Handout 1 plus continued discussion/hw) Comments and Homework in Chapter 1 Chapter 1 contains material on sets, functions, relations, and cardinality that

More information

Lecture 6: Finite Fields

Lecture 6: Finite Fields CCS Discrete Math I Professor: Padraic Bartlett Lecture 6: Finite Fields Week 6 UCSB 2014 It ain t what they call you, it s what you answer to. W. C. Fields 1 Fields In the next two weeks, we re going

More information

2. Two binary operations (addition, denoted + and multiplication, denoted

2. Two binary operations (addition, denoted + and multiplication, denoted Chapter 2 The Structure of R The purpose of this chapter is to explain to the reader why the set of real numbers is so special. By the end of this chapter, the reader should understand the difference between

More information

SETS AND FUNCTIONS JOSHUA BALLEW

SETS AND FUNCTIONS JOSHUA BALLEW SETS AND FUNCTIONS JOSHUA BALLEW 1. Sets As a review, we begin by considering a naive look at set theory. For our purposes, we define a set as a collection of objects. Except for certain sets like N, Z,

More information

Chapter 2. Mathematical Reasoning. 2.1 Mathematical Models

Chapter 2. Mathematical Reasoning. 2.1 Mathematical Models Contents Mathematical Reasoning 3.1 Mathematical Models........................... 3. Mathematical Proof............................ 4..1 Structure of Proofs........................ 4.. Direct Method..........................

More information

Semidirect products are split short exact sequences

Semidirect products are split short exact sequences CHAPTER 16 Semidirect products are split short exact sequences Chit-chat 16.1. Last time we talked about short exact sequences G H K. To make things easier to read, from now on we ll write L H R. The L

More information

Countability. 1 Motivation. 2 Counting

Countability. 1 Motivation. 2 Counting Countability 1 Motivation In topology as well as other areas of mathematics, we deal with a lot of infinite sets. However, as we will gradually discover, some infinite sets are bigger than others. Countably

More information

Math Lecture 23 Notes

Math Lecture 23 Notes Math 1010 - Lecture 23 Notes Dylan Zwick Fall 2009 In today s lecture we ll expand upon the concept of radicals and radical expressions, and discuss how we can deal with equations involving these radical

More information

Discrete Structures Proofwriting Checklist

Discrete Structures Proofwriting Checklist CS103 Winter 2019 Discrete Structures Proofwriting Checklist Cynthia Lee Keith Schwarz Now that we re transitioning to writing proofs about discrete structures like binary relations, functions, and graphs,

More information

means is a subset of. So we say A B for sets A and B if x A we have x B holds. BY CONTRAST, a S means that a is a member of S.

means is a subset of. So we say A B for sets A and B if x A we have x B holds. BY CONTRAST, a S means that a is a member of S. 1 Notation For those unfamiliar, we have := means equal by definition, N := {0, 1,... } or {1, 2,... } depending on context. (i.e. N is the set or collection of counting numbers.) In addition, means for

More information

MATH 13 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS

MATH 13 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS MATH 13 FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS WINTER 2014 Problem 1 (15 points). For each statement below, circle T or F according to whether the statement is true or false. You do NOT need to justify your answers. T F

More information

CM10196 Topic 2: Sets, Predicates, Boolean algebras

CM10196 Topic 2: Sets, Predicates, Boolean algebras CM10196 Topic 2: Sets, Predicates, oolean algebras Guy McCusker 1W2.1 Sets Most of the things mathematicians talk about are built out of sets. The idea of a set is a simple one: a set is just a collection

More information

Sets and Functions. (As we will see, in describing a set the order in which elements are listed is irrelevant).

Sets and Functions. (As we will see, in describing a set the order in which elements are listed is irrelevant). Sets and Functions 1. The language of sets Informally, a set is any collection of objects. The objects may be mathematical objects such as numbers, functions and even sets, or letters or symbols of any

More information

Spanning, linear dependence, dimension

Spanning, linear dependence, dimension Spanning, linear dependence, dimension In the crudest possible measure of these things, the real line R and the plane R have the same size (and so does 3-space, R 3 ) That is, there is a function between

More information

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURE NOTES 5: HOMOMORPHISMS, ISOMORPHISMS, SUBGROUPS, QUOTIENT ( FACTOR ) GROUPS. ANDREW SALCH

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURE NOTES 5: HOMOMORPHISMS, ISOMORPHISMS, SUBGROUPS, QUOTIENT ( FACTOR ) GROUPS. ANDREW SALCH ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURE NOTES 5: HOMOMORPHISMS, ISOMORPHISMS, SUBGROUPS, QUOTIENT ( FACTOR ) GROUPS. ANDREW SALCH 1. Homomorphisms and isomorphisms between groups. Definition 1.1. Let G, H be groups.

More information

Basic Probability. Introduction

Basic Probability. Introduction Basic Probability Introduction The world is an uncertain place. Making predictions about something as seemingly mundane as tomorrow s weather, for example, is actually quite a difficult task. Even with

More information

Nondeterministic finite automata

Nondeterministic finite automata Lecture 3 Nondeterministic finite automata This lecture is focused on the nondeterministic finite automata (NFA) model and its relationship to the DFA model. Nondeterminism is an important concept in the

More information

Building Infinite Processes from Finite-Dimensional Distributions

Building Infinite Processes from Finite-Dimensional Distributions Chapter 2 Building Infinite Processes from Finite-Dimensional Distributions Section 2.1 introduces the finite-dimensional distributions of a stochastic process, and shows how they determine its infinite-dimensional

More information

Sets, Functions and Relations

Sets, Functions and Relations Chapter 2 Sets, Functions and Relations A set is any collection of distinct objects. Here is some notation for some special sets of numbers: Z denotes the set of integers (whole numbers), that is, Z =

More information

Lecture 10: Everything Else

Lecture 10: Everything Else Math 94 Professor: Padraic Bartlett Lecture 10: Everything Else Week 10 UCSB 2015 This is the tenth week of the Mathematics Subject Test GRE prep course; here, we quickly review a handful of useful concepts

More information

1. Continuous Functions between Euclidean spaces

1. Continuous Functions between Euclidean spaces Math 441 Topology Fall 2012 Metric Spaces by John M. Lee This handout should be read between Chapters 1 and 2 of the text. It incorporates material from notes originally prepared by Steve Mitchell and

More information

ABOUT THE CLASS AND NOTES ON SET THEORY

ABOUT THE CLASS AND NOTES ON SET THEORY ABOUT THE CLASS AND NOTES ON SET THEORY About the Class Evaluation. Final grade will be based 25%, 25%, 25%, 25%, on homework, midterm 1, midterm 2, final exam. Exam dates. Midterm 1: Oct 4. Midterm 2:

More information

2. Introduction to commutative rings (continued)

2. Introduction to commutative rings (continued) 2. Introduction to commutative rings (continued) 2.1. New examples of commutative rings. Recall that in the first lecture we defined the notions of commutative rings and field and gave some examples of

More information

ALGEBRA II: RINGS AND MODULES OVER LITTLE RINGS.

ALGEBRA II: RINGS AND MODULES OVER LITTLE RINGS. ALGEBRA II: RINGS AND MODULES OVER LITTLE RINGS. KEVIN MCGERTY. 1. RINGS The central characters of this course are algebraic objects known as rings. A ring is any mathematical structure where you can add

More information

What if the characteristic equation has a double root?

What if the characteristic equation has a double root? MA 360 Lecture 17 - Summary of Recurrence Relations Friday, November 30, 018. Objectives: Prove basic facts about basic recurrence relations. Last time, we looked at the relational formula for a sequence

More information

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

Math 110, Spring 2015: Midterm Solutions

Math 110, Spring 2015: Midterm Solutions Math 11, Spring 215: Midterm Solutions These are not intended as model answers ; in many cases far more explanation is provided than would be necessary to receive full credit. The goal here is to make

More information

Discrete Mathematics: Lectures 6 and 7 Sets, Relations, Functions and Counting Instructor: Arijit Bishnu Date: August 4 and 6, 2009

Discrete Mathematics: Lectures 6 and 7 Sets, Relations, Functions and Counting Instructor: Arijit Bishnu Date: August 4 and 6, 2009 Discrete Mathematics: Lectures 6 and 7 Sets, Relations, Functions and Counting Instructor: Arijit Bishnu Date: August 4 and 6, 2009 Our main goal is here is to do counting using functions. For that, we

More information

CMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computation. Lecture #11: Equivalence Relations David Mix Barrington 27 September 2013

CMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computation. Lecture #11: Equivalence Relations David Mix Barrington 27 September 2013 CMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computation Lecture #11: Equivalence Relations David Mix Barrington 27 September 2013 Equivalence Relations Definition of Equivalence Relations Two More Examples: Universal

More information

MATH ABSTRACT ALGEBRA DISCUSSIONS - WEEK 8

MATH ABSTRACT ALGEBRA DISCUSSIONS - WEEK 8 MAT 410 - ABSTRACT ALEBRA DISCUSSIONS - WEEK 8 CAN OZAN OUZ 1. Isomorphism Theorems In group theory, there are three main isomorphism theorems. They all follow from the first isomorphism theorem. Let s

More information

ADVANCED CALCULUS - MTH433 LECTURE 4 - FINITE AND INFINITE SETS

ADVANCED CALCULUS - MTH433 LECTURE 4 - FINITE AND INFINITE SETS ADVANCED CALCULUS - MTH433 LECTURE 4 - FINITE AND INFINITE SETS 1. Cardinal number of a set The cardinal number (or simply cardinal) of a set is a generalization of the concept of the number of elements

More information

Isomorphisms and Well-definedness

Isomorphisms and Well-definedness Isomorphisms and Well-definedness Jonathan Love October 30, 2016 Suppose you want to show that two groups G and H are isomorphic. There are a couple of ways to go about doing this depending on the situation,

More information

Logic and Mathematics:

Logic and Mathematics: Logic and Mathematics: Mathematicians in Schools Program Lashi Bandara Mathematical Sciences Institute, Australian National University April 21, 2011 Contents 1 Russell s Paradox 1 2 Propositional Logic

More information

CITS2211 Discrete Structures (2017) Cardinality and Countability

CITS2211 Discrete Structures (2017) Cardinality and Countability CITS2211 Discrete Structures (2017) Cardinality and Countability Highlights What is cardinality? Is it the same as size? Types of cardinality and infinite sets Reading Sections 45 and 81 84 of Mathematics

More information

Theorem. For every positive integer n, the sum of the positive integers from 1 to n is n(n+1)

Theorem. For every positive integer n, the sum of the positive integers from 1 to n is n(n+1) Week 1: Logic Lecture 1, 8/1 (Sections 1.1 and 1.3) Examples of theorems and proofs Theorem (Pythagoras). Let ABC be a right triangle, with legs of lengths a and b, and hypotenuse of length c. Then a +

More information

Lecture 8: Equivalence Relations

Lecture 8: Equivalence Relations Lecture 8: Equivalence Relations 1 Equivalence Relations Next interesting relation we will study is equivalence relation. Definition 1.1 (Equivalence Relation). Let A be a set and let be a relation on

More information

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURE NOTES 4: DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES OF MONOIDS AND GROUPS.

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURE NOTES 4: DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES OF MONOIDS AND GROUPS. ABSTRACT ALGEBRA 1, LECTURE NOTES 4: DEFINITIONS AND EXAMPLES OF MONOIDS AND GROUPS. ANDREW SALCH 1. Monoids. Definition 1.1. A monoid is a set M together with a function µ : M M M satisfying the following

More information

What is proof? Lesson 1

What is proof? Lesson 1 What is proof? Lesson The topic for this Math Explorer Club is mathematical proof. In this post we will go over what was covered in the first session. The word proof is a normal English word that you might

More information

INFINITY: CARDINAL NUMBERS

INFINITY: CARDINAL NUMBERS INFINITY: CARDINAL NUMBERS BJORN POONEN 1 Some terminology of set theory N := {0, 1, 2, 3, } Z := {, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, } Q := the set of rational numbers R := the set of real numbers C := the set of complex

More information

A Logician s Toolbox

A Logician s Toolbox A Logician s Toolbox 461: An Introduction to Mathematical Logic Spring 2009 We recast/introduce notions which arise everywhere in mathematics. All proofs are left as exercises. 0 Notations from set theory

More information

The integers. Chapter 3

The integers. Chapter 3 Chapter 3 The integers Recall that an abelian group is a set A with a special element 0, and operation + such that x +0=x x + y = y + x x +y + z) =x + y)+z every element x has an inverse x + y =0 We also

More information

Meta-logic derivation rules

Meta-logic derivation rules Meta-logic derivation rules Hans Halvorson February 19, 2013 Recall that the goal of this course is to learn how to prove things about (as opposed to by means of ) classical first-order logic. So, we will

More information

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions

3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions 24 Andreas Gathmann 3. The Sheaf of Regular Functions After having defined affine varieties, our next goal must be to say what kind of maps between them we want to consider as morphisms, i. e. as nice

More information

MATH 433 Applied Algebra Lecture 14: Functions. Relations.

MATH 433 Applied Algebra Lecture 14: Functions. Relations. MATH 433 Applied Algebra Lecture 14: Functions. Relations. Cartesian product Definition. The Cartesian product X Y of two sets X and Y is the set of all ordered pairs (x,y) such that x X and y Y. The Cartesian

More information

Nets and filters (are better than sequences)

Nets and filters (are better than sequences) Nets and filters (are better than sequences) Contents 1 Motivation 2 2 More implications we wish would reverse 2 3 Nets 4 4 Subnets 6 5 Filters 9 6 The connection between nets and filters 12 7 The payoff

More information

MATH 215 Sets (S) Definition 1 A set is a collection of objects. The objects in a set X are called elements of X.

MATH 215 Sets (S) Definition 1 A set is a collection of objects. The objects in a set X are called elements of X. MATH 215 Sets (S) Definition 1 A set is a collection of objects. The objects in a set X are called elements of X. Notation 2 A set can be described using set-builder notation. That is, a set can be described

More information

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES.

ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY COURSE NOTES, LECTURE 9: SCHEMES AND THEIR MODULES. ANDREW SALCH 1. Affine schemes. About notation: I am in the habit of writing f (U) instead of f 1 (U) for the preimage of a subset

More information

Writing proofs. Tim Hsu, San José State University. May 31, Definitions and theorems 3. 2 What is a proof? 3. 3 A word about definitions 4

Writing proofs. Tim Hsu, San José State University. May 31, Definitions and theorems 3. 2 What is a proof? 3. 3 A word about definitions 4 Writing proofs Tim Hsu, San José State University May 31, 2006 Contents I Fundamentals 3 1 Definitions and theorems 3 2 What is a proof? 3 3 A word about definitions 4 II The structure of proofs 6 4 Assumptions

More information

Definitions: A binary relation R on a set X is (a) reflexive if x X : xrx; (f) asymmetric if x, x X : [x Rx xr c x ]

Definitions: A binary relation R on a set X is (a) reflexive if x X : xrx; (f) asymmetric if x, x X : [x Rx xr c x ] Binary Relations Definition: A binary relation between two sets X and Y (or between the elements of X and Y ) is a subset of X Y i.e., is a set of ordered pairs (x, y) X Y. If R is a relation between X

More information

Foundations of algebra

Foundations of algebra Foundations of algebra Equivalence relations - suggested problems - solutions P1: There are several relations that you are familiar with: Relations on R (or any of its subsets): Equality. Symbol: x = y.

More information

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

1 k x k. d(x, y) =sup k. y k = max

1 k x k. d(x, y) =sup k. y k = max 1 Lecture 13: October 8 Urysohn s metrization theorem. Today, I want to explain some applications of Urysohn s lemma. The first one has to do with the problem of characterizing metric spaces among all

More information

Topology Math Conrad Plaut

Topology Math Conrad Plaut Topology Math 467 2010 Conrad Plaut Contents Chapter 1. Background 1 1. Set Theory 1 2. Finite and Infinite Sets 3 3. Indexed Collections of Sets 4 Chapter 2. Topology of R and Beyond 7 1. The Topology

More information

arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 25 Jul 2017

arxiv: v1 [math.ac] 25 Jul 2017 Primary Decomposition in Boolean Rings David C. Vella, Skidmore College arxiv:1707.07783v1 [math.ac] 25 Jul 2017 1. Introduction Let R be a commutative ring with identity. The Lasker- Noether theorem on

More information

Spectral Graph Theory Lecture 2. The Laplacian. Daniel A. Spielman September 4, x T M x. ψ i = arg min

Spectral Graph Theory Lecture 2. The Laplacian. Daniel A. Spielman September 4, x T M x. ψ i = arg min Spectral Graph Theory Lecture 2 The Laplacian Daniel A. Spielman September 4, 2015 Disclaimer These notes are not necessarily an accurate representation of what happened in class. The notes written before

More information

Symmetries and Polynomials

Symmetries and Polynomials Symmetries and Polynomials Aaron Landesman and Apurva Nakade June 30, 2018 Introduction In this class we ll learn how to solve a cubic. We ll also sketch how to solve a quartic. We ll explore the connections

More information

CSCI3390-Lecture 6: An Undecidable Problem

CSCI3390-Lecture 6: An Undecidable Problem CSCI3390-Lecture 6: An Undecidable Problem September 21, 2018 1 Summary The language L T M recognized by the universal Turing machine is not decidable. Thus there is no algorithm that determines, yes or

More information

Economics 204 Summer/Fall 2017 Lecture 1 Monday July 17, 2017

Economics 204 Summer/Fall 2017 Lecture 1 Monday July 17, 2017 Economics 04 Summer/Fall 07 Lecture Monday July 7, 07 Section.. Methods of Proof We begin by looking at the notion of proof. What is a proof? Proof has a formal definition in mathematical logic, and a

More information

Math 31 Lesson Plan. Day 2: Sets; Binary Operations. Elizabeth Gillaspy. September 23, 2011

Math 31 Lesson Plan. Day 2: Sets; Binary Operations. Elizabeth Gillaspy. September 23, 2011 Math 31 Lesson Plan Day 2: Sets; Binary Operations Elizabeth Gillaspy September 23, 2011 Supplies needed: 30 worksheets. Scratch paper? Sign in sheet Goals for myself: Tell them what you re going to tell

More information

0 Logical Background. 0.1 Sets

0 Logical Background. 0.1 Sets 0 Logical Background 0.1 Sets In this course we will use the term set to simply mean a collection of things which have a common property such as the totality of positive integers or the collection of points

More information

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS

SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS SEPARATED AND PROPER MORPHISMS BRIAN OSSERMAN Last quarter, we introduced the closed diagonal condition or a prevariety to be a prevariety, and the universally closed condition or a variety to be complete.

More information

Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes

Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes Foundations of Mathematics MATH 220 FALL 2017 Lecture Notes These notes form a brief summary of what has been covered during the lectures. All the definitions must be memorized and understood. Statements

More information

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009

Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 18.726 Algebraic Geometry Spring 2009 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 18.726: Algebraic Geometry

More information

HOW TO CREATE A PROOF. Writing proofs is typically not a straightforward, algorithmic process such as calculating

HOW TO CREATE A PROOF. Writing proofs is typically not a straightforward, algorithmic process such as calculating HOW TO CREATE A PROOF ALLAN YASHINSKI Abstract We discuss how to structure a proof based on the statement being proved Writing proofs is typically not a straightforward, algorithmic process such as calculating

More information

MATH 22 FUNCTIONS: COMPOSITION & INVERSES. Lecture N: 10/16/2003. Mad world! mad kings! mad composition! Shakespeare, King John, II:1

MATH 22 FUNCTIONS: COMPOSITION & INVERSES. Lecture N: 10/16/2003. Mad world! mad kings! mad composition! Shakespeare, King John, II:1 MATH 22 Lecture N: 10/16/2003 FUNCTIONS: COMPOSITION & INVERSES Mad world! mad kings! mad composition! Shakespeare, King John, II:1 Copyright 2003 Larry Denenberg Administrivia http://denenberg.com/lecturen.pdf

More information

Short Introduction to Admissible Recursion Theory

Short Introduction to Admissible Recursion Theory Short Introduction to Admissible Recursion Theory Rachael Alvir November 2016 1 Axioms of KP and Admissible Sets An admissible set is a transitive set A satisfying the axioms of Kripke-Platek Set Theory

More information

JOURNAL OF INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS

JOURNAL OF INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS Edited: 4:18pm, July 17, 2012 JOURNAL OF INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS Analysis 1 W. Ted Mahavier < W. S. Mahavier Lamar University 1 If each of X and Y is a person, then the relation X < Y indicates

More information

Scott Taylor 1. EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS. Definition 1.1. Let A be a set. An equivalence relation on A is a relation such that:

Scott Taylor 1. EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS. Definition 1.1. Let A be a set. An equivalence relation on A is a relation such that: Equivalence MA Relations 274 and Partitions Scott Taylor 1. EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS Definition 1.1. Let A be a set. An equivalence relation on A is a relation such that: (1) is reflexive. That is, (2) is

More information

ACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS 1 MATH00030 SEMESTER / Functions

ACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS 1 MATH00030 SEMESTER / Functions ACCESS TO SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND AGRICULTURE: MATHEMATICS 1 MATH00030 SEMESTER 1 2017/2018 DR. ANTHONY BROWN 4. Functions 4.1. What is a Function: Domain, Codomain and Rule. In the course so far, we

More information

MATH 220 (all sections) Homework #12 not to be turned in posted Friday, November 24, 2017

MATH 220 (all sections) Homework #12 not to be turned in posted Friday, November 24, 2017 MATH 220 (all sections) Homework #12 not to be turned in posted Friday, November 24, 2017 Definition: A set A is finite if there exists a nonnegative integer c such that there exists a bijection from A

More information

Supplementary Material for MTH 299 Online Edition

Supplementary Material for MTH 299 Online Edition Supplementary Material for MTH 299 Online Edition Abstract This document contains supplementary material, such as definitions, explanations, examples, etc., to complement that of the text, How to Think

More information

a (b + c) = a b + a c

a (b + c) = a b + a c Chapter 1 Vector spaces In the Linear Algebra I module, we encountered two kinds of vector space, namely real and complex. The real numbers and the complex numbers are both examples of an algebraic structure

More information

LECTURE 5, FRIDAY

LECTURE 5, FRIDAY LECTURE 5, FRIDAY 20.02.04 FRANZ LEMMERMEYER Before we start with the arithmetic of elliptic curves, let us talk a little bit about multiplicities, tangents, and singular points. 1. Tangents How do we

More information

5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting

5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting 5 Set Operations, Functions, and Counting Let N denote the positive integers, N 0 := N {0} be the non-negative integers and Z = N 0 ( N) the positive and negative integers including 0, Q the rational numbers,

More information