Mark Scheme. Mathematics General Certificate of Education examination - June series. MS/SS1A Statistics 1A

Transcription

1 Version 1.0: 0606 abc General Certificate of Education Mathematics 6360 MS/SS1A Statistics 1A Mark Scheme 2006 examination - June series Mark schemes are prepared by the Principal Examiner and considered, together with the relevant questions, by a panel of subject teachers. This mark scheme includes any amendments made at the standardisation meeting attended by all examiners and is the scheme which was used by them in this examination. The standardisation meeting ensures that the mark scheme covers the candidates responses to questions and that every examiner understands and applies it in the same crect way. As preparation f the standardisation meeting each examiner analyses a number of candidates scripts: alternative answers not already covered by the mark scheme are discussed at the meeting and legislated f. If, after this meeting, examiners encounter unusual answers which have not been discussed at the meeting they are required to refer these to the Principal Examiner. It must be stressed that a mark scheme is a wking document, in many cases further developed and expanded on the basis of candidates reactions to a particular paper. Assumptions about future mark schemes on the basis of one year s document should be avoided; whilst the guiding principles of assessment remain constant, details will change, depending on the content of a particular examination paper. Copyright 2006 AQA and its licenss. All rights reserved.

2 MS/SS1A AQA GCE Mark Scheme, 2006 June series Key To Mark Scheme And Abbreviations Used In Marking M m dm A B E mark is f method mark is dependent on one me M marks and is f method mark is dependent on M m marks and is f accuracy mark is independent of M m marks and is f method and accuracy mark is f explanation ft F follow through from previous increct result MC mis-copy CAO crect answer only MR mis-read CSO crect solution only RA required accuracy AWFW anything which falls within FW further wk AWRT anything which rounds to ISW igne subsequent wk ACF any crect fm FIW from increct wk AG answer given BOD given benefit of doubt SC special case WR wk replaced by candidate OE equivalent FB fmulae book A2,1 2 1 ( 0) accuracy marks NOS not on scheme x EE deduct x marks f each err G graph NMS no method shown c candidate PI possibly implied sf significant figure(s) SCA substantially crect approach dp decimal place(s) No Method Shown Where the question specifically requires a particular method to be used, we must usually see evidence of use of this method f any marks to be awarded. However, there are situations in some units where part marks would be appropriate, particularly when similar techniques are involved. Your Principal Examiner will alert you to these and details will be provided on the mark scheme. Where the answer can be reasonably obtained without showing wking and it is very unlikely that the crect answer can be obtained by using an increct method, we must award full marks. However, the obvious penalty to candidates showing no wking is that increct answers, however close, earn no marks. Where a question asks the candidate to state write down a result, no method need be shown f full marks. Where the permitted calculat has functions which reasonably allow the solution of the question directly, the crect answer without wking earns full marks, unless it is given to less than the degree of accuracy accepted in the mark scheme, when it gains no marks. Otherwise we require evidence of a crect method f any marks to be awarded. 2

3 AQA GCE Mark Scheme, 2006 June series MS/SS1A MS/SS1A 1(a) r = to B3 AWFW r = to B2 AWFW r = 0.1 to 0.2 AWRT Attempt at Σx Σx 2 Σy Σy 2 Σxy 3952, , Attempt at S xx S yy S xy , , Attempt at a crect fmula f r m1 r = to A1 3 AWFW (b) Little/weak/no crelation/relationship/association between number of pages and (retail) price 2 equivalent; but not po context (c) Size (page, thickness), auth, ranking, publicity/marketing, cover design, recommendations on back, publisher, font, popularity, quality, print-run, etc 1 any sensible variable but not pictures, coloured pictures, age, wds, weight, mass Total 6 2(a) Gradient, b = 3.24 to 3.26 B2 AWFW ( 3.25) b = 3.2 to 3.3 AWFW Intercept, a = 262 to 264 B2 AWFW ( ! ) a = 260 to 270 AWFW Attempt at Σx Σx 2 Σy Σxy 108, 1836, 2015, Attempt at S xx S xy 540, 1755 Attempt at a crect fmula f b m1 b = 3.24 to 3.26 A1 AWRT a = 262 to 264 A1 4 AWFW Accept a & b interchanged only if identified crectly in (b) and (c) (b) Gradient, b: Decrease in pressure per month B2 equivalent Change in pressure 2 better (c) Intercept, a: Initial pressure pressure at x = 0 equivalent; not y-intercept Reference to 265, actual expected value 2 Total 8 3

4 MS/SS1A AQA GCE Mark Scheme, 2006 June series MS/SS1A (cont) 3(a) B(15, 0.3) use of in (a) (i) (Fewer than) half 7 7½ 8 stated implied Thus require P(K 7 < 8) used implied by crect answer = to A1 4 AWFW (0.9500) (ii) P(2 < K < 7) = minus = to A1 AWFW (0.7421) B(15, 0.3) expressions stated f at least 3 terms within 2 K 7 implied by a crect answer Answer A2 3 (b)(i) Mean, µ = np = = 6 CAO 2 Variance, σ = np( 1 p) = = use of σ = np( 1 p) Standard deviation = 3.6 = 1.89 to 1.9 A1 3 AWFW; equivalent (ii) Mean, x = 6 CAO (Σx = 60) CSO if evidence of np(1 p) 1.9 Standard deviation, s σ = 2.82 to AWFW; equivalent. (Σx 2 = 440) (iii) Means are same/equal on 2 means; accept 6 = 0.4 if not 15 contradicted by x in (ii) Standard deviations are different dep dependent on 2 crect SDs Reason to doubt validity of Kirk s claim dep 3 dependent on 2 crect SDs Total 15 4

5 AQA GCE Mark Scheme, 2006 June series MS/SS1A MS/SS1A (cont) 4 0(R) 1(S) 2(T) 3 T_ D(D) SD(D ) T (a)(i) P(D) = CAO; equivalent (ii) P(D R) = CSO; equivalent (iii) (iv) P(D R) = P(R D ) = P ( D R) ( ii) = = ( ) P( R) P( R) ( ) M0 if independence assumed = A1 2 CAO; equivalent P ( R D ) P( D ) = 40 ( 320 ) ( ) numerat allow independence assumed denominat = A1 3 CAO; equivalent (b)(i) R and S R and T S and T 1 not D and D (ii) P(D) = = P(D R) (i) = (iii) P(D) P(R) = = = P(D R) (ii) P(R D) = P(R) = 0.2, etc so YES A1 2 (c)(i) A semi-detached house two children ( both) (ii) A detached house and/with less than two children 2 2 Total 14 CAO equivalent CAO (0 1 must not include both ) 5

6 MS/SS1A AQA GCE Mark Scheme, 2006 June series MS/SS1A (cont) 5(a) Weight, X ~ N(1012, 5 2 ) (i) P(X < 1015) = P Z < 5 standardising (1014.5, ) with 1012 and ( 5, ) and/ (1012 x) = P(Z < 0.6) A1 CAO; igne sign = Φ(0.6) = to A1 3 AWFW ( ) (ii) P(X > 1005) = P Z > 5 standardising (1004.5, ) with 1012 and ( 5, ) and/ (1012 x) = P(Z > 1.4) = P(Z < 1.4) m1 area change = to A1 3 AWRT ( ) (iii) P(1005 < X < 1015) = (i) [1 (ii)] equivalent = [ ] = to A1 2 AWFW ( ) on (i) and (ii) providing > 0 (b) (i) Mean, y = CAO; stated implied 2 2 Variance, σ / s = 50.3 to 51.5 Standard deviation, σ / s = 7.09 to 7.17 AWFW; either stated implied 98% z = 2.32 to % t = 2.40 (Knowledge of the t-distribution is not required in this unit) ( σ s) CI f µ is y ( z t) n Thus 7.09 to ± ( ) AWFW (2.3263) AWRT (2.403) ± use of; must have ( n ) with n > 1 A1 on x, z/t and σ / s > 0; n = only ± (2.32 to 2.46) (500.3 to 500.6, to 505.4) A1 dep 6 AWFW; dependent on A1 (ii) Given sample: 6 in 50/some of packets have weights equivalent below 500 grams Confidence interval: CI > 500 on CI in (b)(i) Conclusion: Statement does not appear justified dep 3 equivalent. dependent on both and Total 17 TOTAL 60 6