arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 3 Jan 2019
|
|
- Moris Porter
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Experimental investigation of majorization uncertainty relations in the high-dimensional systems Yuan Yuan Yunlong Xiao 4 Zhibo Hou Shao-Ming Fei 5 6 Gilad Gour 4 Guo-Yong Xiang Chuan-Feng Li and Guang-Can Guo CAS Key Laboratory of Quantum Information University of Science and Technology of China Hefei 6 China Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 6 China Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Calgary Calgary Alberta TN N4 Canada 4 Institute for Quantum Science and Technology University of Calgary Calgary Alberta TN N4 Canada 5 School of Mathematical Sciences Capital Normal University Beijing 48 China 6 Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences 4 Leipzig Germany arxiv:9.85v [quant-ph] Jan 9 Uncertainty relation is not only of fundamental importance to quantum mechanics but also crucial to the quantum information technology. Recently majorization formulation of uncertainty relations (MURs have been widely studied ranging from two measurements to multiple measurements. Here for the first time we experimentally investigate MURs for two measurements and multiple measurements in the high-dimensional systems and study the intrinsic distinction between direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs. The experimental results reveal that by taking different nonnegative Schur-concave functions as uncertainty measure the two types of MURs have their own particular advantages and also verify that there exists certain case where three-measurement majorization uncertainty relation is much stronger than the one obtained by summing pairwise two-measurement uncertainty relations. Our work not only fills the gap of experimental studies of majorization uncertainty relations but also represents an advance in quantitatively understanding and experimental verification of majorization uncertainty relations which are universal and capture the essence of uncertainty in quantum theory. Introduction. Critical to almost all respects of quantum theory including quantum information theory is the ability to specify simultaneously the precise outcomes from incompatible measurements. This fundamental mechanism was first introduced by Heisenberg in 97 with the name Uncertainty Principle [] which acts as one of the most striking features of quantum theory that introduces intrinsic limitations on the measurement precision of incompatible observables. At the same year Kennard [] and Weyl [] derived the first mathematical formulation for position and momentum based on standard deviation respectively. To understand the incompatibility between bounded observables Robertson uncertainty relation was given in [4]. From the information theoretic viewpoint entropies are suitable tools in measuring the uncertainties of physical system giving rise to entropic uncertainty relations. The first Shannon entropic uncertainty relation was given in 98 by Deutsch [5]. Later it has been improved by Maassen and Uffink [6]. Besides the fundamental role of entropic uncertainty relation it also leads to a wide range of applications in certifying quantum randomness [7 8] security proofs for quantum cryptography [9 ] detecting entanglement [ 5] Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR steering [6 8] studying the wave-particle duality [9 ] and even the curved spacetime []. Due to their importance the uncertainty relations based on variances and entropies were tested experimentally with neutronic system [ 4] photonic system [5 ] nitrogen-vacancy (NV center [] and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR []. Only recently physicists realize that the uncertainty of a quantum system should be nondecreasing under randomly chosen symmetry transformation and classical processing via channels [4]. As such nonnegative Schur-concave functions including entropies become qualified candidates for uncertainty measures and joint uncertainty relations should be characterized by majorization [5 8]. Based on their formalization majorization uncertainty relations can be divided into two categories; direct-product majorization uncertainty relations (direct-product MURs [8 9] (also known as universal uncertainty relations (UUR and direct-sum majorization uncertainty relations (direct-sum MURs [4]. The present theoretical treatment of majorization uncertainty relations (MURs has been widely studied [4 45] and much of the interest in majorization uncertainty relations comes from the possibility of detecting entanglement and Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen steering [46 49]. Motivated by the significant value of majorization uncertainty relations in quantum theory we study the intrinsic distinction between direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs and experimentally test the two-measurement and multi-measurement MURs in the high-dimensional systems for the first time. In our experiment we obtain a series of probability distributions induced by measuring a qudit state encoded with path and polarization degree of freedom of the photon in the eigenbasis of the observable. Furthermore comparisons between direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs based on different nonnegative Schur-concave functions are also demonstrated. Our work not only fills the gap of experimental studies of majorization uncertainty relations but also enriches the experimental investigations of high-dimensional uncertainty relations and could stimulate the usages of majorization uncertainty relations in experimentally detecting entanglement and EPR steering. Theoretical framework. We begin with a quantum state ρ in a d-dimensional Hilbert space H with observables A =
2 { a j } d j= and B = { b k } d k=. Denote p j(ρ = a j ρ a j as the probability of receiving outcome j {...d} when performing measurement A and define p := (p j j as the probability distribution vector corresponds to observable A. Analogously we can construct the probability distribution vector q := (q k k for observable B. We write the direct-product between them as p q and use p q to present their direct-sum. Consider now the majorization relation between vectors: a vector x R d is majorized by another vector y R d whenever k j= x j k j= y j for all k d while d j= x j = d j= y j and we write x y. Here the down-arrow notation denotes that the components of the corresponding vector are ordered in decreasing order i.e. x x x d [5]. With the majorization relation for vectors we now present direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs as p q ω DP ( p q ω DS ( where ρ runs over all quantum states in H with ω DP ω DS standing for the state-independent bound of direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs respectively. Let us take any nonnegative Schur-concave function U to quantify the uncertainties and apply it to direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs which leads to U (p q U (ω DP ( U (p q U (ω DS. (4 The universality of MURs comes from the diversity of uncertainty measures U and direct-product MURs direct-sum MURs stand for different kind of uncertainties. To construct the bound ω DP and ω DS we can follow the method introduced in [8 4]. We next move to describe the additivity of uncertainty measures and call a measure U direct-product additive if U (p q = U (p + U (q. Instead of direct-product between probability distribution vectors one can also consider direct-sum and define direct-sum additive for U whenever it satisfies U (p q = U (p + U (q. Note that the joint uncertainty p q considered here is unnormalized and comparison between direct-product MURs and normalized directsum MURs is detailed in the Appendix [5]. Once an uncertainty measure U is evolved to both direct-product additive and direct-sum additive then we call it super additive for uncertainties. It is worth to mention that U (p q = U (p q whenever the uncertainty measure is super additive. Consequently the bound ω DS for direct-sum MURs performs better than ω DP in the case of super additive U (p q = U (p q U (ω DS U (ω DP (5 since ω DS ω DP [4]. We remark that the well known Shannon entropy is super additive and only by applying super additive functions [5] like Shannon entropy direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs are comparable. It should also be clear that direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs have been employed to describe different type of uncertainties. For an uncertainty measure U in general it can be checked that U (p q U (p q and hence it is meaningless to state that direct-sum MURs performs better than direct-product MURs and vice versa. One of the main goals in the study of uncertainty relations is the quantification of the joint uncertainty of incompatible observables. Direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs provide us two different methods to quantify joint uncertainty between incompatible observables. Relations between directproduct MURs and direct-sum MURs are of fundamental importance both for the theoretical characterization of joint uncertainties as well as the experimental implementation. Quite uncannily we find that for some eligible uncertainty measure U direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs are given by U (p q U (ω DS > U (p q U (ω DP (6 for some quantum state ρ. Let us now construct such uncertainty measure U. First define the summation function S as S (u := l u l = u with u = (u u...u d. Another important function M is defined as M (u := max l u l = Hmin(u. And hence it is easy to check that U := S M is a nonnegative Schur-concave functions; take two vectors satisfying x y and based on the definition of U we have U (x = d j= x j d j= y j = U (y. Specifically this function which combines S and M together is a qualified uncertainty measure and satisfies Eq. (6 for some quantum states and measurements. Moreover specific examples are given in the following experimental demonstration. In principle direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs do not have to be comparable and their joint uncertainty can be quantified by their bound. However we can compare their differences by checking which bound approximates their joint uncertainty better since joint uncertainties are often classified by their bounds. Take any nonnegative Schurconcave function U which leads to two nonnegative quantities ξ DS := U (p q U (ω DS and ξ DP := U (p q U (ω DP. To determine whether the bound ω DP approximates direct-product MURs better than ω DS approximates directsum MURs we simply compare the numerical value of ξ DS and ξ DP. And how such bounds contribute to the joint uncertainties are depicted in our experiment. The question arises whether the majorization uncertainty relations including direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs can be extended to multi-measurement cases and the answer is clear. We assume that the experimenter performs measurements C l (l > to the quantum state ρ and denote their probability distributions as p l then the multimeasurement joint uncertainties can be quantified by p l ω MDP l l p l ω MDS (7
3 FIG. : Experimental setup. In the single-photon source module the photon pairs generated in spontaneous parametric down-conversion are coupled into single-mode fibers separately. One photon is detected by a single-photon detector (SPD acting as a trigger. In the state preparation module a qudit state is encoded by four modes of the single photons. H and V denote the horizontal polarization and vertical polarization of the photon respectively. The subscripts u and d represent the upper and lower spatial modes of the photon respectively. The half-wave plates (H H and beam displacer (BD are used to generate desired qudit state. In the measurement module the red HWPs with an angle of 45 and beam displacers (BDs comprise the interferometric network to perform the desired measurement; the yellow HWP with an angle of are inserted into the middle path to compensate the optical path difference between the upper and lower spatial modes. To realize measurement B shown in Eq. (9 two quarter-wave plates are need to be inserted in device (b. Output photons are detected by single-photon detectors (SPDs. where ω MDP and ω MDS are the bounds for multimeasurement direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs constructed in [8] and [4] respectively. To experimentally test direct-product MURs direct-sum MURs and their relations we choose a family of 4dimensional states ψθ φ i = cos θ sin φ i + cos θ cos φ i + sin θ i = (cos θ sin φ cos θ cos φ sin θ > (8 where i i i i are orthonormal basis states in a 4dimensional Hilbert space. Correspondingly we measure the state Eq. (8 in the following measurements including two measurements A = { i i i i} i i i i i + i i i i + i i i B= i + i i i i i i + i i + i i + i } { (9 and three measurements C = { i i i i} i + i i + i i i i + i } ( 6 i + i i + i i i i + i C = { i }. 6 C = { i Experimental demonstration. We experimentally test direct-product MURs direct-sum MURs and their relations with a linear optical system. The experimental setup illustrated in Fig. consists of three modules including the single-photon source module (see Appendix C for details the state preparation module and the measurement module. In the state preparation module a qudit state is encoded by four modes of the heralded single photon and the basis states i i i and i are encoded by the horizontal polarization of the photon in the lower mode the vertical polarization of the photon in the lower mode the horizontal polarization of the photon in the upper mode and the vertical polarization of the photon in the upper mode respectively. The beam displacer (BD causes the vertical polarized photons to be transmitted directly and the horizontal polarized photons to undergo a 4mm lateral displacement so the photon passes through a halfwave plate (H with a certain setting angle and then is split by BD into two parallel spatial modes upper and lower modes. H and H control the parameters θ and φ respectively thus the photon is prepared in the desired state ψθ φ i. In the measurement module measuring device (a is used to realize measurement A and measurement C. When the measuring device (b has quarter-wave plates with an angle of 45 it is used to realize measurement B and the setting angles of H H6 are 45.5 and.5 respectively. The measuring device (b without quarter-wave plates is used to realize measurement
4 4 (b.6 H(A ξdp (a value value. ShannonCentropy ξds.4 ξ.4. ξdp ξds ф (degree (c.5..5 H(C 6.5 ξds.8 ξ ф (degree θ(degree C (C when the setting angles of H H6 are.5 ( and respectively. Experimental results. To test the relation Eq. (6 and compare the differences of direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs by checking which bound approximates their joint uncertainty better we experimentally obtain a series of probability distributions induced by measuring state ψθ φ i in the measurements Eq. (9 and Eq. (. Under Schur-concave function U := S M Fig. depicts the experimental valω DS U (p q. We ues of ξdp ξds and ξ with ξ = U (ω remark that ξ stands for the difference between the bounds ω DS and the joint uncertainty of of direct-sum MURs U (ω direct-product MURs U (p q. Whenever the quantity ξ ω DS to bound U (p q and is positive we cannot use U (ω thus cannot state that the bound of direct-sum MURs outperforms the bound of direct-product MURs. Fig. (a and (b show the experimental results by measuring states ψπ/4φ i and ψθ π/4 i in the two measurements Eq. (9 respectively. In Fig. (a ξdp is less than ξds which implies that the bound of direct-product MURs approximates their joint uncertainty better but in Fig. (b which bound is better depends on the state. Fig. (c and Fig. (d demonstrate the experimental results by measuring states ψπφ i and ψθ π/ i in the three measurements Eq. ( respectively. We can see that ξdp is always less than ξds with the variation of the state ψθ φ i which means that the bound of direct-product MURs approx- H(C Σ H(C i= H(ω MDP i H(ω MDS (d 4 FIG. : Experimental results for comparing the differences of directproduct MURs and direct-sum MURs by checking which bound approximates their joint uncertainty better. The curve is theoretical value and the dot is experimental value. The three quantiω DS ξdp := U (p ties are expressed as ξds := U (p q U (ω ω DP and ξ = U (ω ω DS U (p q with U := S M. q U (ω Fig. (a and (b show the experimental results by measuring states ψπ/4φ i and ψθ π/4 i in the two measurements Eq. (9 respectively. Fig. (c and (d show the experimental results by measuring states ψπφ i and ψθ π/ i in the three measurements Eq. ( respectively. The error bar denotes the standard deviation. H(C θ(degree (c 4 ShannonCentropy ξdp value value ξ.5.5 φ(degree ξdp ξds H(ωDS (b (d H(ωDP θ(degree H(A+H(B ShannonCentropy ξ H(B ShannonCentropy (a φ(degree θ(degree FIG. : Experimental results for majorization uncertainty relations based on Shannon entropy measure. Fig. (a and (b show the results for measuring states ψπ/4φ i and ψθ π/4 i in the measurements A and B respectively. The green dots and curve represent Shannon entropy of the probability distributions induced by measurement A. The blue dots and curve represent Shannon entropy of the probability distributions induced by measurement B. The red dots and curve represent the sum of H(A and H(B. The dashed line and dashdotted line are the bounds of the two-measurement direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs respectively. Fig. (c and (d show the results for measuring states ψπφ i and ψθ π/ i in the measurements C C and C respectively. The magenta green blue triangles and curve represent Shannon entropy of the probability distributions obtained by measuring the C C and C respectively. The red triangles and curve represent the sum of the H(C H(C and H(C. The dotted line and solid line are the bounds of the threemeasurement direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs respectively. The error bar denotes the standard deviation. imates their joint uncertainty better in the case of these measurements and states than that of direct-sum MURs. From Fig. it is clear that ξ is always greater than zero and hence both the mathematical inequality Eq. (6 and its physical significance have been verified. From the information theoretic viewpoint entropic functions are important nonnegative Schur-concave functions. We are interested in entropic uncertainty relations which can be derived by setting U as the Shannon entropylh and N ω MDP and H( l pl > can be expressed as H( l pl > H(ω ω MDS. Here we also compare direct-product MURs and H(ω direct-sum MURs with Shannon entropy and the experimental results are portrayed in Fig.. Fig. (a and Fig. (b exhibit the experimental results for two-measurement majorization uncertainty relation based on Shannon entropy measure; by choosing measurements A and B the bound of direct-product MURs ω DP is given by ω DP = (
5 5 which implies H(ω DP =.477 shown by the dashed line in Fig. (a and Fig. (b. On the other hand ω DS = ( and as a consequence we have H(ω DS =.489 shown by the dash-dotted line in Fig. (a and Fig. (b. Now we are in the position in describing the experimental results for three-measurement majorization uncertainty relation based on Shannon entropy measure. The bound of direct-product MURs ω MDP is given by ( which leads to H(ω MDP =.765 as shown by the dotted line in the Fig. (c and Fig. (d. Meanwhile ω MDS is given by ( with H(ω MDS =.7979 as shown by the line in the Fig. (c and Fig. (d. For all these cases with two measurements or three measurements the bound of direct-sum MURs is always tighter than the bound of directproduct MURs which verified the relation Eq. (5. Finally we remark that general multi-measurement uncertainty relation can be generated by summing pairwise two-measurement uncertainty relations trivially while in our three-measurement case pairwise two-measurement uncertainty relations lead to a trivial bound of zero but the majorization uncertainty relation for the three measurements remains nontrivial. Conclusions. To summarize we have experimentally studied the high-dimensional majorization uncertainty relations namely direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs with a linear optical system and analyzed the essential difference between them for the first time. Direct-product MURs and directsum MURs are different types of joint uncertainty taking different nonnegative Schur-concave functions as uncertainty measure these two majorization uncertainty relations have their own particular advantages. From experimental data direct-sum MURs are stronger than directproduct MURs under Shannon entropy. Moreover we have also experimentally verified that there exists certain case where three-measurement majorization uncertainty relation is much stronger (with nontrivial bound than the one obtained by summing pairwise two-measurement uncertainty relations (with trivial bound. We expect that our theoretical analysis and experimental tests will lead to further results that enrich the studies of high-dimensional uncertainty relations. Specifically our work could provide potential applications in the field of quantum information technology such as quantum precision measurement detecting entanglement and EPR steering. Acknowledgements: This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No and No China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 6M6 and No. 8T68 National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grants No. 6YFA7 and No.7YFA4 and Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies. Y. Xiao and G. Gour acknowledge NSERC support. S.-M. Fei acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 675 and Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (KZ884. Appendix A: Normalized direct-sum MURs The direct-sum MURs were first given in [4] with the form p q ω DS (A. for probability distributions p and q. However unlike p q constructed in direct-product MURs [8] p q is not a probability distribution. In order to derive a normalized direct-sum MURs we simply take the weight / p q ω DS. (A. And now we compare the normalized direct-sum MURs p q ω DS with direct-product MURs p q ω DP ; by taking the states shown in the main text ψ θφ = cosθ sinφ + cosθ cosφ + sinθ = (cosθ sinφcosθ cosφsinθ and measurements A B with the following eigenvectors A = { } i i + i + i { B = + i i + i + i + }. (A. (A.4 We depicted the pictures of H (p q H ( p q H (ω DP and H ( ω DS in Fig. 4. Appendix B: Super Additivity To be comparable for direct-product MURs and direct-sum MURs we should choose a uncertainty measure U that are both Schur-concave and super additive. Clearly Shannon entropy is a qualified candidate. The question thus naturally arises: is there another function satisfies the following properties: Property. U should be continuous in p and q. Property. U should be a Schur-concave function. Property. U should be super additive i.e. U (p q = U (p + U (q U (p q = U (p + U (q. (A.5 (A.6 Or will these properties lead to a unique function (up to a scalar? Since we can take q as (... and then U (p q = U (p which is continuous in the p i while p = (p i i. Moreover due to the Schur-concavity U is a monotonic increasing function of d when taking p i = d. In addition if U complies with the composition law for compound experiments then there is only one possible expression for U i.e. Shannon entropy (up to a scalar. Namely if there is a measure say U (p = U (p p... p d which is required to meet the following three properties:
6 6 Shannon entropy Shannon entropy.5.5 H(p q H( p q H(ω DP H( ω DS φ(degree.5.5 H(p q H( p q H(ω DP H( ω DS θ(degree FIG. 4: Experimental results for comparison between normalized direct-sum MURs and direct-product MURs based on Shannon entropy measure. The two pictures show the results for measuring states ψ π/4φ and ψ θπ/4 in the observables A and B respectively. Property 4. U should be continuous in p. Property 5. If all the p i are equal p i = d then U should be a monotonic increasing function of d. With equally d likely events there is more choice or uncertainty when there are more possible events. Property 6. (Composition Law If a choice be broken down into two successive choices the original U should be the weighted sum of the individual values of U. Then the only U satisfying the three above assumptions is of the form [5]: ( U (p = k d i= p i log p i (A.7 where k is a positive constant. Whenever a function U satisfies Property and Property it will meet Property 4 and Property 5 automatically. However super additivity differs with the Composition Law and this leads to function satisfied Property and other than Shannon entropy. For example consider the composition between logarithmic function and elementary symmetric function: d F (p := log( p i. (A.8 i= Here F satisfies Properties and the direct-product MURs is read as ( F (p q = log p i q j = log = log ( ( i j i p i q j j p i + log i ( q j j = F (p + F (q (A.9 where the probability distributions p and q are defined as (p i i and (q j j. On the other hand direct-sum MURs is written as ( F (p q = log p i q j = F (p q (A. i j hence F meets Property. To summarize we derive a function F which is valid for Properties and. However F is not a good uncertainty measure since F (ω DS and F (ω DP are not well defined (due to log. Whether there exists another function that obeys Property and is an open question and one may conjecture that F Shannon entropy H and the convex combinations of F and H are the only suitable candidates. Appendix C: Details for the single-photon source module of the experimental setup In the single-photon source module a 8-mW cw laser with a 44-nm wavelength (linewidth=5 MHz pumps a type-ii beamlike phase-matching beta-barium-borate (BBO mm θ = 4.98 crystal to produce a pair of photons with wavelength λ = 88 nm. After being redirected by mirrors and passed through the interference filters (IF λ = nm λ = 88 nm the photon pairs generated in spontaneous parametric down-conversion are coupled into single-mode fibers separately. One photon is detected by a single-photon detector acting as a trigger. The total coincidence counts are approximately 4 per second.
7 7 Electronic address: Electronic address: [] W. Heisenberg Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik Z. Phys. 4 7 (97. [] E. H. Kennard Zur quantenmechanik einfacher bewegungstypen Z. Phys (97. [] H. Weyl Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik (Hirzel Leipzig 98 [English translation H.P. Robertson The Theory of Groups and Quantum Mechanics (Dover New York 9]. [4] H. P. Robertson The uncertainty principle Phys. Rev. 4 6 (99. [5] D. Deutsch Uncertainty in quantum measurements Phys. Rev. Lett. 5 6 (98. [6] H. Maassen and J. B. M. Uffink Generalized entropic uncertainty relations Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 (988. [7] P. J. Coles M. Berta M. Tomamichel and S. Wehner Entropic uncertainty relations and their applications Rev. Mod. Phys (7. [8] G. Vallone D. G. Marangon M. Tomasin and P. Villoresi Quantum randomness certified by the uncertainty principle Phys. Rev. A 9 57 (4. [9] S. Wehner C. Schaffner and B. M. Terhal Cryptography from Noisy Storage Phys. Rev. Lett. 5 (8. [] J. M. Renes and J. C. Boileau Conjectured Strong Complementary Information Tradeoff Phys. Rev. Lett. 4 (9. [] M. Berta M. Christandl R. Colbeck J. M. Renes and R. Renner The uncertainty principle in the presence of quantum memory Nature Phys (. [] V. Giovannetti Separability conditions from entropic uncertainty relations Phys. Rev. A 7 (4. [] O. Gühne and M. Lewenstein Entropic uncertainty relations and entanglement Phys. Rev. A 7 6 (4. [4] Y. Huang Entanglement criteria via concave-function uncertainty relations Phys. Rev. A 8 5 (. [5] M. Berta P. J. Coles and S. Wehner Entanglement-assisted guessing of complementary measurement outcomes Phys. Rev. A 9 67 (4. [6] S. P. Walborn A. Salles R. M. Gomes F. Toscano and P. H. Souto Ribeiro Revealing Hidden Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Nonlocality Phys. Rev. Lett. 6 4 (. [7] J. Schneeloch C. J. Broadbent S. P. Walborn E. G. Cavalcanti and J. C. Howell Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering inequalities from entropic uncertainty relations Phys. Rev. A 87 6 (. [8] A. Riccardi C. Macchiavello and L. Maccone Multipartite steering inequalities based on entropic uncertainty relations Phys. Rev. A (8. [9] P. J. Coles J. Kaniewski and S. Wehner Equivalence of waveparticle duality to entropic uncertainty Nat. Comm (4. [] G. M. Bosyk M. Portesi F. Holik and A. Plastino On the connection between complementarity and uncertainty principles in the Mach-Zehnder interferometric setting Phys. Scr (. [] J.-L. Huang W.-C. Gan Y. Xiao F.-W. Shu and M.-H. Yung Holevo bound of entropic uncertainty in Schwarzschild spacetime Eur. Phys. J. C (8. [] J. Erhart S. Sponar G. Sulyok G. Badurek M. Ozawa and Y. Hasegawa Experimental demonstration of a universally valid error-disturbance uncertainty relation in spin measurements Nat. Phys (. [] G. Sulyok S. Sponar J. Erhart G. Badurek M. Ozawa and Y. Hasegawa Violation of Heisenberg s error-disturbance uncertainty relation in neutron-spin measurements Phys. Rev. A 88 (. [4] G. Sulyok S. Sponar B. Demirel F. Buscemi M. J. W. Hall M. Ozawa and Y. Hasegawa Experimental Test of Entropic Noise- Disturbance Uncertainty Relations for Spin-/ Measurements Phys. Rev. Lett. 5 4 (5. [5] C.-F. Li J.-S. Xu X.-Y. Xu K. Li and G.-C. Guo Experimental investigation of the entanglement-assisted entropic uncertainty principle Nat. Phys (. [6] R. Prevedel D. R. Hamel R. Colbeck K. Fisher and K. J. Resch Experimental investigation of the uncertainty principle in the presence of quantum memory and its application to witnessing entanglement Nat. Phys (. [7] L. A. Rozema A. Darabi D. H. Mahler A. Hayat Y. Soudagar and A. M. Steinberg Violation of Heisenberg s Measurement- Disturbance Relationship by Weak Measurements Phys. Rev. Lett (. [8] M. Ringbauer D. N. Biggerstaff M. A. Broome A. Fedrizzi C. Branciard and A. G. White Experimental Joint Quantum Measurements with Minimum Uncertainty Phys. Rev. Lett. 4 (4. [9] F. Kaneda S.-Y. Baek M. Ozawa and K. Edamatsu Experimental Test of Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relations by Weak Measurement Phys. Rev. Lett. 4 (4. [] K. Wang X. Zhan Z. Bian J. Li Y. Zhang and P. Xue Experimental investigation of the stronger uncertainty relations for all incompatible observables Phys. Rev. A 9 58 (6. [] Y.-Y. Zhao P. Kurzyński G.-Y. Xiang C.-F. Li and G.-C. Guo Heisenberg s error-disturbance relations: A joint measurementbased experimental test Phys. Rev. A 95 4(R (7. [] W. Ma B. Chen Y. Liu M. Wang X. Ye F. Kong F. Shi S.- M. Fei and J. Du Experimental Demonstration of Uncertainty Relations for the Triple Components of Angular Momentum Phys. Rev. Lett (7. [] W. Ma Z. Ma H. Wang Z. Chen Y. Liu F. Kong Z. Li X. Peng M. Shi F. Shi S.-M. Fei and J. Du Experimental Test of Heisenberg s Measurement Uncertainty Relation Based on Statistical Distances Phys. Rev. Lett (6. [4] V. Narasimhachar A. Poostindouz and G. Gour Uncertainty joint uncertainty and the quantum uncertainty principle New J. Phys. 8 9 (6. [5] M. Albert W. O. Ingram and B. C. Arnold Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications (nd Edition Springer Series in Statistics (Springer New York. [6] M. H. Partovi Majorization formulation of uncertainty in quantum mechanics Phys. Rev. A (. [7] M. H. Partovi Entanglement detection using majorization uncertainty bounds Phys. Rev. A 86 9 (. [8] S. Friedland V. Gheorghiu and G. Gour Universal Uncertainty Relations Phys. Rev. Lett. 4 (. [9] Z. Puchała Ł. Rudnicki and K. Życzkowski Majorization entropic uncertainty relations J. Phys. A 46 7 (. [4] Ł. Rudnicki Z. Puchała and K. Życzkowski Strong majorization entropic uncertainty relations Phys. Rev. A (4. [4] Y. Xiao N. Jing S.-M. Fei T. Li X. L.-Jost T. Ma and Z.-X. Wang Strong entropic uncertainty relations for multiple measurements Phys. Rev. A 9 45 (6. [4] T. Li Y. Xiao T. Ma S.-M. Fei N. Jing X. L.-Jost and Z.- X. Wang Optimal Universal Uncertainty Relations Sci. Rep (6.
8 8 [4] Y. Xiao N. Jing S.-M. Fei and X. Li-Jost Improved uncertainty relation in the presence of quantum memory J. Phys. A 49 49LT (6. [44] Y. Xiao N. Jing and X. Li-Jost Uncertainty under quantum measures and quantum memory Quantum Inf. Proc. 6 4 (7. [45] Z. Puchała Ł. Rudnicki A. Krawiec and K. Życzkowski Majorization uncertainty relations for mixed quantum states J. Phys. A (8. [46] Y. Xiao N. Jing X. Li-Jost and S. -M. Fei Uniform Entanglement Frames Int. J. Theor. Phys (6. [47] Z.-A. Jia Y.-C. Wu and G.-C. Guo Characterizing nonlocal correlations via universal uncertainty relations Phys. Rev. A 96 (7. [48] K. Wang N. Wu and F. Song Entanglement detection via direct-sum majorization uncertainty relations arxiv:87.6. [49] Y. Xiao Y. Xiang Q. He and B. C. Sanders Quasi-Fine- Grained Uncertainty Relations arxiv: [5] See Appendix for details of the comparison between directproduct MURs p q ω DP and normalized direct-sum MURs p q ω DS and discussions on super additive functions; other than Shannon entropy another Schur-concave and super additive function has been constructed in Appendix B. [5] C. E. Shannon A Mathematical Theory of Communication Bell Syst. Tech. J 7 79 (948.
arxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 24 May 2017
A Stronger Multi-observable Uncertainty Relation Qiu-Cheng Song, Jun-Li Li,, Guang-Xiong Peng, and Cong-Feng Qiao,,* Department of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, YuQuan Road 9A, Beijing
arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 17 Nov 2016
Improved Uncertainty Relation in the Presence of Quantum Memory Yunlong Xiao, 1, Naihuan Jing, 3,4 Shao-Ming Fei, 5, and Xianqing Li-Jost 1 School of Mathematics, South China University of Technology,
arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 10 Aug 2016
Multi-observable Uncertainty Relations in Product Form of Variances arxiv:608.03089v [quant-ph] 0 Aug 206 Hui-Hui Qin & Shao-Ming Fei 2,3 & Xianqing Li-Jost 3 Department of Mathematics, School of Science,
arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 26 Sep 2018
Tightening the entropic uncertainty relations for multiple measurements and applying it to quantum coherence H. Dolatkhah Department of Physics, University of Kurdistan, P.O.Box 6677-575, Sanandaj, Iran
Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Edward Pei. Abstract
Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Edward Pei Abstract The purpose of this laboratory experiment is to verify quantum entanglement of the polarization of two photon pairs. The entanglement of the photon
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planc-Institut für Mathemati in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig Uncertainty Relations Based on Sew Information with Quantum Memory by Zhi-Hao Ma, Zhi-Hua Chen, and Shao-Ming Fei Preprint no.: 4 207
arxiv: v2 [quant-ph] 12 Sep 2017
APS/13-QED Quantum uncertainty relation using coherence Xiao Yuan, 1 Ge Bai, Tianyi Peng, 1 and Xiongfeng Ma 1, 1 Center for Quantum Information, Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, Tsinghua
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig Experimental Demonstration of Uncertainty Relations for the Triple Components of Angular Momentum by Wenchao Ma, Bin Chen, Ying Liu,
arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 6 Feb 2017
arxiv:1702.02440v1 [quant-ph] 6 Feb 2017 Note: Using Stein s estimator to correct the bound on the entropic uncertainty principle for more than two measurements Mark Stander Electronic address: mark.stander@gmail.com
arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 3 May 2017
arxiv:1705.01385v1 [quant-ph] 3 May 2017 Optimal joint measurements of complementary observables by a single trapped ion T. P. Xiong 1,2, L. L. Yan 1,2, Z. H. Ma 3, F. Zhou 1, L. Chen 1, W. L. Yang 1,
Laboratory 1: Entanglement & Bell s Inequalities
Laboratory 1: Entanglement & Bell s Inequalities Jose Alejandro Graniel Institute of Optics University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, U.S.A Abstract This experiment purpose was to study the violation
PREPARATION UNCERTAINTY RELATIONS BEYOND HEISENBERG S
PREPARATION UNCERTAINTY RELATIONS BEYOND HEISENBERG S Quantum Information and Computation Group Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Allahabad, India S. N. Bose Center, Jan 29-Feb 2, 2018 Plan Introduction.
arxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 26 Feb 2018
Experimental demonstration of wave-particle duality relation based on coherence measure arxiv:70.06308v3 [quant-ph] 6 Feb 08 Yuan Yuan,, Zhibo Hou,, Yuan-Yuan Zhao,, Han-Sen Zhong,, Guo-Yong Xiang,,, Chuan-Feng
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Realization of quantum Wheeler s delayed-choice experiment Jian-Shun Tang, 1 Yu-Long Li, 1 Xiao-Ye Xu, 1 Guo-Yong Xiang, 1 Chuan-Feng Li, 1 and Guang-Can Guo 1 1 Key Laboratory of Quantum Information,
Error-disturbance uncertainty relations studied in neutron optics
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Error-disturbance uncertainty relations studied in neutron optics To cite this article: Stephan Sponar et al 2016 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 76 01208 View
Entropic Formulation of Heisenberg s Measurement-Disturbance Relation
Entropic Formulation of Heisenberg s Measurement-Disturbance Relation arxiv:1311.7637 QPL 2014, Kyoto, 6. June 2014 Fabian Furrer Joint work with: Patrick Coles @ Different Uncertainty Trade-Offs Uncertainty
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig Coherence of Assistance and Regularized Coherence of Assistance by Ming-Jing Zhao, Teng Ma, and Shao-Ming Fei Preprint no.: 14 2018
A Superluminal communication solution based on Four-photon entanglement
A Superluminal communication solution based on Four-photon entanglement Jia-Run Deng cmos001@163.com Abstract : Based on the improved design of Four-photon entanglement device and the definition of Encoding
Quantification of Gaussian quantum steering. Gerardo Adesso
Quantification of Gaussian quantum steering Gerardo Adesso Outline Quantum steering Continuous variable systems Gaussian entanglement Gaussian steering Applications Steering timeline EPR paradox (1935)
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den Naturwissenschaften Leipzig
Max-Planck-Institut für Mathematik in den aturwissenschaften Leipzig Bell inequality for multipartite qubit quantum system and the maximal violation by Ming Li and Shao-Ming Fei Preprint no.: 27 2013 Bell
Experimental generalized contextuality with single-photon qubits: supplementary material
Experimental generalized contextuality with single-photon qubits: supplementary material XIANG ZHAN 1, ERIC G. CAVALCANTI 2, JIAN LI 1, ZHIHAO BIAN 1, YONGSHENG ZHANG 3,4*, HOWARD M. WISEMAN 2,5,, AND
Take that, Bell s Inequality!
Take that, Bell s Inequality! Scott Barker November 10, 2011 Abstract Bell s inequality was tested using the CHSH method. Entangled photons were produced from two different laser beams by passing light
Quantum entanglement and its detection with few measurements
Quantum entanglement and its detection with few measurements Géza Tóth ICFO, Barcelona Universidad Complutense, 21 November 2007 1 / 32 Outline 1 Introduction 2 Bipartite quantum entanglement 3 Many-body
Steering and Entropic Uncertainty Relations
Steering and Entropic Uncertainty Relations Ana C. S. Costa, Roope Uola, Otfried Gühne Department of Physics, University of Siegen - Germany September 5, 2017 na C. S. Costa, Roope Uola, Otfried Gühne
Hong-Ou-Mandel effect with matter waves
Hong-Ou-Mandel effect with matter waves R. Lopes, A. Imanaliev, A. Aspect, M. Cheneau, DB, C. I. Westbrook Laboratoire Charles Fabry, Institut d Optique, CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud Progresses in quantum information
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Entanglement between Separated. Atomic Ensembles
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Entanglement between Separated Atomic Ensembles Wei Zhang *, Ming-Xin Dong *, Dong-Sheng Ding, Shuai Shi, Kai Wang, Shi-Long Liu, Zhi-Yuan Zhou, Guang-Can Guo, Bao-Sen Shi # 1 Key
Lab. 1: Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities. Abstract
December 15, 2008 Submitted for the partial fulfilment of the course PHY 434 Lab. 1: Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Mayukh Lahiri 1, 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester,
No Fine Theorem for Macrorealism
No Fine Theorem for Macrorealism Johannes Kofler Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (MPQ) Garching/Munich, Germany Quantum and Beyond Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden 14 June 2016 Acknowledgments
arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 2 Oct 1997
Experimental Realization of Teleporting an nknown Pure Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-Podolski-Rosen Channels arxiv:quant-ph/97003v Oct 997 D. Boschi (), S. Branca (), F. De Martini (),
UNCERTAINTY RELATIONS FOR TWO OBSERVABLES COUPLED WITH THE THIRD ONE. V. V. Dodonov
UNCERTAINTY RELATIONS FOR TWO OBSERVABLES COUPLED WITH THE THIRD ONE V. V. Dodonov Institute of Physics and International Center for Physics, University of Brasilia, P.O. Box 055, Brasilia 70919-970, Federal
Multipartite Einstein Podolsky Rosen steering and genuine tripartite entanglement with optical networks
Multipartite Einstein Podolsky Rosen steering and genuine tripartite entanglement with optical networks Seiji Armstrong 1, Meng Wang 2, Run Yan Teh 3, Qihuang Gong 2, Qiongyi He 2,3,, Jiri Janousek 1,
Information-theoretic treatment of tripartite systems and quantum channels. Patrick Coles Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA USA
Information-theoretic treatment of tripartite systems and quantum channels Patrick Coles Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA USA ArXiv: 1006.4859 a c b Co-authors Li Yu Vlad Gheorghiu Robert Griffiths
Theory of Quantum Entanglement
Theory of Quantum Entanglement Shao-Ming Fei Capital Normal University, Beijing Universität Bonn, Bonn Richard Feynman 1980 Certain quantum mechanical effects cannot be simulated efficiently on a classical
Experiment 6 - Tests of Bell s Inequality
Exp.6-Bell-Page 1 Experiment 6 - Tests of Bell s Inequality References: Entangled photon apparatus for the undergraduate laboratory, and Entangled photons, nonlocality, and Bell inequalities in the undergraduate
Contextuality and the Kochen-Specker Theorem. Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
Contextuality and the Kochen-Specker Theorem Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics by Christoph Saulder 19. 12. 2007 Interpretations of quantum mechanics Copenhagen interpretation the wavefunction has no
Uncertainty relation between angle and orbital angular momentum: interference effect in electron vortex beams
NANOSYSTEMS: PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY, MATHEMATICS, 015, 6 (), P. 05 1 Uncertainty relation between angle and orbital angular momentum: interference effect in electron vortex beams Shogo Tanimura Department
Ponownie o zasadach nieoznaczoności:
.. Ponownie o zasadach nieoznaczoności: Specjalne seminarium okolicznościowe CFT, 19 czerwca 2013 KŻ (CFT/UJ) Entropic uncertainty relations June 19, 2013 1 / 20 Majorization Entropic Uncertainty Relations
arxiv: v1 [quant-ph] 12 Mar 2016
One-way Quantum Deficit Decoherence for Two-qubit X States Biao-Liang Ye, 1 Yao-Kun Wang,, 3 Shao-Ming Fei 1, 1 School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 18, China Institute of
No Fine theorem for macroscopic realism
No Fine theorem for macroscopic realism Johannes Kofler Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (MPQ) Garching/Munich, Germany 2nd International Conference on Quantum Foundations Patna, India 17 Oct. 2016
Title Experimental long-distance quantum secure direct communication
Title Experimental long-distance quantum secure direct communication The authors Feng Zhu, Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology, Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua
CSCO Criterion for Entanglement and Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
CSCO Criterion for Entanglement and Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle J. Y. Zeng 1, Y. A. Lei 1, S. Y. Pei, X. C. Zeng 3 1 School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing, 1871, China Department of Physics,
QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND ITS ASPECTS. Dileep Dhakal Masters of Science in Nanomolecular Sciences
QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND ITS ASPECTS Dileep Dhakal Masters of Science in Nanomolecular Sciences Jacobs University Bremen 26 th Nov 2010 Table of Contents: Quantum Superposition Schrödinger s Cat Pure vs.
Absorption-Amplification Response with or Without Spontaneously Generated Coherence in a Coherent Four-Level Atomic Medium
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 42 (2004) pp. 425 430 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 42, No. 3, September 15, 2004 Absorption-Amplification Response with or Without Spontaneously Generated
Entropic Uncertainty Relations, Unbiased bases and Quantification of Quantum Entanglement
Entropic Uncertainty Relations, Unbiased bases and Quantification of Quantum Entanglement Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with Lukasz Rudnicki (Warsaw) Pawe l Horodecki (Gdańsk) Phys. Rev. Lett. 107,
Uncertainty Relations, Unbiased bases and Quantification of Quantum Entanglement
Uncertainty Relations, Unbiased bases and Quantification of Quantum Entanglement Karol Życzkowski in collaboration with Lukasz Rudnicki (Warsaw) Pawe l Horodecki (Gdańsk) Jagiellonian University, Cracow,
On PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 42 (2004) pp. 25 222 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 42, No. 2, August 5, 2004 On PPT States in C K C M C N Composite Quantum Systems WANG Xiao-Hong, FEI
Quantum Entanglement, Quantum Cryptography, Beyond Quantum Mechanics, and Why Quantum Mechanics Brad Christensen Advisor: Paul G.
Quantum Entanglement, Quantum Cryptography, Beyond Quantum Mechanics, and Why Quantum Mechanics Brad Christensen Advisor: Paul G. Kwiat Physics 403 talk: December 2, 2014 Entanglement is a feature of compound
arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 5 Sep 2002
Realization of All-or-nothing-type Kochen-Specker Experiment with Single Photons Yun-Feng Huang, Chuan-Feng Li, Yong-Sheng Zhang, Jian-Wei Pan, and Guang-Can Guo Key Laboratory of Quantum Information,
Singlet State Correlations
Chapter 23 Singlet State Correlations 23.1 Introduction This and the following chapter can be thought of as a single unit devoted to discussing various issues raised by a famous paper published by Einstein,
Lab 1 Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities
Quantum Optics Lab Review Justin Winkler Lab 1 Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Entanglement Wave-functions are non-separable Measurement of state of one particle alters the state of the other particle
Entropic uncertainty relations for Markovian and non-markovian processes under a structured bosonic reservoir. Abstract
Entropic uncertainty relations for Markovian and non-markovian processes under a structured bosonic reservoir Dong Wang,, 2, Ai-Jun Huang, Ross D. Hoehn, 3, 4 Fei Ming, Wen-Yang Sun, Jia-Dong Shi, Liu
Quantum and Nano Optics Laboratory. Jacob Begis Lab partners: Josh Rose, Edward Pei
Quantum and Nano Optics Laboratory Jacob Begis Lab partners: Josh Rose, Edward Pei Experiments to be Discussed Lab 1: Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Lab 2: Single Photon Interference Labs 3 and 4:
Erwin Schrödinger and his cat
Erwin Schrödinger and his cat How to relate discrete energy levels with Hamiltonian described in terms of continгous coordinate x and momentum p? Erwin Schrödinger (887-96) Acoustics: set of frequencies
Quantum Measurement Uncertainty
Quantum Measurement Uncertainty Reading Heisenberg s mind or invoking his spirit? Paul Busch Department of Mathematics Quantum Physics and Logic QPL 2015, Oxford, 13-17 July 2015 Paul Busch (York) Quantum
arxiv: v3 [quant-ph] 30 Oct 2017
Noname manuscript No (will be inserted by the editor) Lower bound on concurrence for arbitrary-dimensional tripartite quantum states Wei Chen Shao-Ming Fei Zhu-Jun Zheng arxiv:160304716v3 [quant-ph] 30
Direct observation of Hardy's paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair
Direct observation of Hardy's paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair To cite this article: Kazuhiro Yokota et al 2009 New J. Phys. 11 033011 View the article online for updates
Problem Set: TT Quantum Information
Problem Set: TT Quantum Information Basics of Information Theory 1. Alice can send four messages A, B, C, and D over a classical channel. She chooses A with probability 1/, B with probability 1/4 and C
Analysis of photon flux distribution of type-Ⅱ SPDC for highly efficient entangled source adjustment
Analysis of photon flux distribution of type-Ⅱ SPDC for highly efficient entangled source adjustment Ziyi Wang 1, Heying Wang 1, Wenbo Sun 1,* 1Physics Department, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084,
Timeline: Bohm (1951) EPR (1935) CHSH (1969) Bell (1964) Theory. Freedman Clauser (1972) Aspect (1982) Weihs (1998) Weinland (2001) Zeilinger (2010)
1.EPR paradox 2.Bohm s version of EPR with spin ½ particles 3.Entangled states and production 4.Derivation of CHSH inequality - S parameter for mixed and entangled state 5. Loopholes 6.Experiments confirming
Solving the Einstein Podolsky Rosen puzzle: The origin of non-locality in Aspect-type experiments
Front. Phys., 2012, 7(5): 504 508 DOI 10.1007/s11467-012-0256-x RESEARCH ARTICLE Solving the Einstein Podolsky Rosen puzzle: The origin of non-locality in Aspect-type experiments Werner A. Hofer Department
CLASSIFICATION OF MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATES OF SPIN 1/2 PARTICLES
CLASSIFICATION OF MAXIMALLY ENTANGLED STATES OF SPIN 1/ PARTICLES S. Ghosh, G. Kar, and A. Roy Physics and Applied Mathematics Unit Indian Statistical Institute 03, B. T. Road Calcutta 700 035 India. E
Quantum Measurement Uncertainty
Quantum Measurement Uncertainty New Relations for Qubits Paul Busch Department of Mathematics Siegen, 9 July 2015 Paul Busch (York) Quantum Measurement Uncertainty 1 / 40 Peter Mittelstaedt 1929-2014 Paul
1 1D Schrödinger equation: Particle in an infinite box
1 OF 5 1 1D Schrödinger equation: Particle in an infinite box Consider a particle of mass m confined to an infinite one-dimensional well of width L. The potential is given by V (x) = V 0 x L/2, V (x) =
Quantum Entanglement, Beyond Quantum Mechanics, and Why Quantum Mechanics
Quantum Entanglement, Beyond Quantum Mechanics, and Why Quantum Mechanics Brad Christensen Advisor: Paul G. Kwiat Physics 403 talk: July 28, 2014 Entanglement is a feature of compound quantum systems States
- Presentation - Quantum and Nano-Optics Laboratory. Fall 2012 University of Rochester Instructor: Dr. Lukishova. Joshua A. Rose
- Presentation - Quantum and Nano-Optics Laboratory Fall 2012 University of Rochester Instructor: Dr. Lukishova Joshua A. Rose Contents Laboratory 1: Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Laboratory 2:
Experimentally testing Bell s theorem based on Hardy s nonlocal ladder proofs
. Article. SCIENCE CHINA Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy February 2015 Vol. 58 No. 2: 024201 doi: 10.1007/s11433-014-5495-0 Experimentally testing Bell s theorem based on Hardy s nonlocal ladder proofs
Quantum Optics and Quantum Information Laboratory Review
Quantum Optics and Quantum Information Laboratory Review Fall 2010 University of Rochester Instructor: Dr. Lukishova Joshua S. Geller Outline Lab 1: Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Lab 2: Single Photon
Wavelength switchable flat-top all-fiber comb filter based on a double-loop Mach-Zehnder interferometer
Wavelength switchable flat-top all-fiber comb filter based on a double-loop Mach-Zehnder interferometer Ai-Ping Luo, Zhi-Chao Luo,, Wen-Cheng Xu,, * and Hu Cui Laboratory of Photonic Information Technology,
EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION OF QUANTUM KEY
EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION OF QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION WITH ENTANGLED PHOTONS FOLLOWING THE PING- PONG CODING PROTOCOL Martin Ostermeyer, Nino Walenta University of Potsdam, Institute of Physics, Nonlinear
Bell s inequality Experimental exercise
Bell s inequality Experimental exercise Introduction Purposes of the lab Besides familiarizing yourselves with the important concept of Bell s inequality in relation to the Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen arguments
ENTROPIC UNCERTAINTY RELATIONS
ENTROPIC UNCERTAINTY RELATIONS Iwo Bialynicki-Birula Center for Theoretical Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Lotnikow 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland This is a modified version of my contribution to the
Schemes to generate entangled photon pairs via spontaneous parametric down conversion
Schemes to generate entangled photon pairs via spontaneous parametric down conversion Atsushi Yabushita Department of Electrophysics National Chiao-Tung University? Outline Introduction Optical parametric
P3TMA Experimental Projects
P3TMA Experimental Projects 3 credits Take place @ S1 (from end of September to December); Enters in the average of the second semester. Projects currently available : Stern-Gerlach Experiment Quantum
Remote State Preparation: Arbitrary remote control of photon polarizations for quantum communication
Remote State Preparation: Arbitrary remote control of photon polarizations for quantum communication N. A. Peters a, J. T. Barreiro a, M. E. Goggin a,b, T.-C. Wei a, and P. G. Kwiat a a Physics Department,
Collapse versus correlations, EPR, Bell Inequalities, Cloning
Collapse versus correlations, EPR, Bell Inequalities, Cloning The Quantum Eraser, continued Equivalence of the collapse picture and just blithely/blindly calculating correlations EPR & Bell No cloning
Path Entanglement. Liat Dovrat. Quantum Optics Seminar
Path Entanglement Liat Dovrat Quantum Optics Seminar March 2008 Lecture Outline Path entangled states. Generation of path entangled states. Characteristics of the entangled state: Super Resolution Beating
Quantum information processing using linear optics
Quantum information processing using linear optics Karel Lemr Joint Laboratory of Optics of Palacký University and Institute of Physics of Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic web: http://jointlab.upol.cz/lemr
Closing the Debates on Quantum Locality and Reality: EPR Theorem, Bell's Theorem, and Quantum Information from the Brown-Twiss Vantage
Closing the Debates on Quantum Locality and Reality: EPR Theorem, Bell's Theorem, and Quantum Information from the Brown-Twiss Vantage C. S. Unnikrishnan Fundamental Interactions Laboratory Tata Institute
Characterization of a Polarisation Based Entangled Photon Source
The African Review of Physics (04) 9:009 7 Characterization of a Polarisation Based Entangled Photon Source Y. Ismail,*, A. R. Mirza,, A. Forbes,3 and F. Petruccione,,4 University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban
Entanglement. arnoldzwicky.org. Presented by: Joseph Chapman. Created by: Gina Lorenz with adapted PHYS403 content from Paul Kwiat, Brad Christensen
Entanglement arnoldzwicky.org Presented by: Joseph Chapman. Created by: Gina Lorenz with adapted PHYS403 content from Paul Kwiat, Brad Christensen PHYS403, July 26, 2017 Entanglement A quantum object can
Bell s Theorem. Ben Dribus. June 8, Louisiana State University
Bell s Theorem Ben Dribus Louisiana State University June 8, 2012 Introduction. Quantum Theory makes predictions that challenge intuitive notions of physical reality. Einstein and others were sufficiently
(Received 22 October 2009; revised manuscript received 30 December 2010)
Chin. Phys. B Vol. 19 No. 9 010) 090313 Teleportation and thermal entanglement in two-qubit Heisenberg XY Z spin chain with the Dyaloshinski Moriya interaction and the inhomogeneous magnetic field Gao
Representation of the quantum and classical states of light carrying orbital angular momentum
Representation of the quantum and classical states of light carrying orbital angular momentum Humairah Bassa and Thomas Konrad Quantum Research Group, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa
Characterization of Entanglement Photons Generated by a Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion Pulse Source
Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 45 : 72-76 (20) Characterization of Entanglement Photons Generated by a Spontaneous Parametric Down-Conversion Pulse Source Ekkasit Sakatok and Surasak Chiangga 2 * ABSTRACT Quantum
CURRICULUM VITAE GUO-YONG XIANG DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
CURRICULUM VITAE GUO-YONG XIANG DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Name: Xiang Guo-Yong Sex: Male Birthplace: Anhui, P. R. China Position: Professor, University of Science & Technology of China Address: Key Lab of
The Two Quantum Measurement Theories and the Bell-Kochen-Specker Paradox
International Journal of Electronic Engineering Computer Science Vol. 1, No. 1, 2016, pp. 40-44 http://www.aiscience.org/journal/ijeecs The Two Quantum Measurement Theories the Bell-Kochen-Specker Paradox
0.5 atoms improve the clock signal of 10,000 atoms
0.5 atoms improve the clock signal of 10,000 atoms I. Kruse 1, J. Peise 1, K. Lange 1, B. Lücke 1, L. Pezzè 2, W. Ertmer 1, L. Santos 3, A. Smerzi 2, C. Klempt 1 1 Institut für Quantenoptik, Leibniz Universität
PHY3902 PHY3904. Photon Entanglement. Laboratory protocol
HY390 HY390 hoton ntanglement Laboratory protocol Goals. Learn how to create and detect pairs of photons entangled in polarization.. Test the lauser Horne Shimony and Holt version of the Bell inequality
EPR Paradox Solved by Special Theory of Relativity
EPR Paradox Solved by Special Theory of Relativity Justin Lee June 20 th, 2013 Abstract This paper uses the special theory of relativity (SR) to introduce a novel solution to Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen (EPR)
arxiv:quant-ph/ v1 5 Aug 2004
1 Generation of polarization entangled photon pairs and violation of Bell s inequality using spontaneous four-wave mixing in fiber loop Hiroki Takesue and Kyo Inoue arxiv:quant-ph/0408032v1 5 Aug 2004
Quantum Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Zachary Evans, Joel Howard, Jahnavi Iyer, Ava Dong, and Maggie Han
Quantum Entanglement and Bell s Inequalities Zachary Evans, Joel Howard, Jahnavi Iyer, Ava Dong, and Maggie Han Institute of Optics, University of Rochester Opt 101 Meeting, December 4, 2012, Rochester
Information Entropy Squeezing of a Two-Level Atom Interacting with Two-Mode Coherent Fields
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing, China) 4 (004) pp. 103 109 c International Academic Publishers Vol. 4, No. 1, July 15, 004 Information Entropy Squeezing of a Two-Level Atom Interacting with Two-Mode Coherent
VIC Effect and Phase-Dependent Optical Properties of Five-Level K-Type Atoms Interacting with Coherent Laser Fields
Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing China) 50 (2008) pp. 741 748 c Chinese Physical Society Vol. 50 No. 3 September 15 2008 VIC Effect and Phase-Dependent Optical Properties of Five-Level K-Type Atoms Interacting
Multipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation. Abstract
Multipartite Monogamy of the Entanglement of Formation Xian Shi Institute of Mathematics, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese
Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals
Kurt Gottfried Tung-Mow Yan Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals Second Edition With 75 Figures Springer Preface vii Fundamental Concepts 1 1.1 Complementarity and Uncertainty 1 (a) Complementarity 2 (b) The
Exploiting path-polarization hyperentangled photons for multiqubit quantum information protocols
Exploiting path-polarization hyperentangled photons for multiqubit quantum information protocols Candidate: Mario A. Ciampini, Supervisor: Prof. Paolo Mataloni March 30, 015 Introduction A bit is the minimal
Correlation between classical Fisher information and quantum squeezing properties of Gaussian pure states
J. At. Mol. Sci. doi: 0.4208/jams.02090.0360a Vol., No. 3, pp. 262-267 August 200 Correlation between classical Fisher information and quantum squeezing properties of Gaussian pure states Jia-Qiang Zhao
arxiv: v1 [math-ph] 19 May 2014
Oscillator Model of Spin Yitian Ding, Miaomiao Xu Department of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 50100, China (Dated: May 0, 014) Abstract arxiv:1405.4614v1 [math-ph] 19 May 014 The Schwinger s representation
Quantum interference of multimode two-photon pairs with a Michelson interferometer. Abstract
Quantum interference of multimode two-photon pairs with a Michelson interferometer Fu-Yuan Wang, Bao-Sen Shi, and Guang-Can Guo Key Laboratory of Quantum Information, University of Science and Technology
Physics is becoming too difficult for physicists. David Hilbert (mathematician)
Physics is becoming too difficult for physicists. David Hilbert (mathematician) Simple Harmonic Oscillator Credit: R. Nave (HyperPhysics) Particle 2 X 2-Particle wave functions 2 Particles, each moving