and the nite horizon cost index with the nite terminal weighting matrix F > : N?1 X J(z r ; u; w) = [z(n)? z r (N)] T F [z(n)? z r (N)] + t= [kz? z r
|
|
- Louisa Conley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Intervalwise Receding Horizon H 1 -Tracking Control for Discrete Linear Periodic Systems Ki Baek Kim, Jae-Won Lee, Young Il. Lee, and Wook Hyun Kwon School of Electrical Engineering Seoul National University, Seoul , KOREA FAX: , Tel: whkwon@cisl.snu.ac.kr Abstract In this paper, a xed-horizon H 1 tracking control (HTC) for discrete time-varying systems is obtained via the dynamic game theory in state-feedback case. From HTC, an intervalwise receding horizon H 1 tracking control (IHTC) for discrete periodic systems is suggested using the intervalwise strategy. The conditions under which IHTC stabilizes the closed-loop system are proposed. Under proposed stability conditions, it is shown that IHTC guarantees the H 1 -norm bound and that IHTC with integral action provides zero oset for a constant command signal. The performance of IHTC is compared with that of RHTC via simulation studies for a discrete periodic system. 1 Introduction The receding horizon control strategy has been developed as a proper control strategy for tracking performance and time-varying systems. It is well known that this strategy presents more practical aspects in the applications to real systems than the innite horizon control strategy, because it needs only information for only a nite future time. As an approach to overcome this tracking problem, the receding horizon strategy has been developed. The receding horizon strategy is obtaining a solution to optimize a nite future cost horizon. There are two receding horizon strategies, the pointwise and intervalwise one. As well shown in [3], in the pointwise strategy, the terminal point of a xedlength nite cost horizon continuously recedes at each time instant. In the intervalwise strategy the terminal point is kept xed for a nite cost horizon and, after one period, the terminal point moves by one period and xed by the next period. The intervalwise strategy presents some advantages over the pointwise one in some respects. It has much less computation burdens than the pointwise one, since the intervalwise one requires calculation of control gain per a period of every cost horizon while the other one requires it per every time instant. During the horizon in which the optimal solutions are implemented, the intervalwise strategy is optimal, while the pointwise one is suboptimal. Hence the tracking performance of the intervalwise strategy is superior to the other one. The pointwise strategy has been developed for general timevarying systems [8], [1], [11], while the intervalwise strategy only for periodic and time-invariant systems [2], [3], [9]. There has been a few studies on the receding horizon tracking problems and its stability property in the H 1 problem [4], [5], [11]. But the intervalwise receding horizon strategy has not been investigated in the tracking problems and the H 1 problem to authors's knowledge. In this paper, an intervalwise receding horizon H 1 tracking control (IHTC) for discrete periodic systems is proposed. Our xed nite horizon H 1 tracking control (HTC) which is rst obtained to derive IHTC is dierent from that of [5]. The solution (HTC) is obtained via the dynamic game theory as shown in [6], [7]. The condidions under which closed loop stability, zero-oset tracking error, and innite horizon H 1 norm bound are guaranteed with IHTC are proposed, respectively. 2 H 1 tracking control for discrete time-varying systems We derive a nite horizon H 1 -tracking control (HTC) using the previous result [6], [7] in which only the regulation problem is dealt with. Consider the following discrete time-varying system: x(t + 1) = Ax + B 1 w + B 2 u (1) Cx yr z = ; z u r = x 2 R n ; u 2 R m ; w 2 R l ; z 2 R p+m
2 and the nite horizon cost index with the nite terminal weighting matrix F > : N?1 X J(z r ; u; w) = [z(n)? z r (N)] T F [z(n)? z r (N)] + t= [kz? z r k 2 2? 2 kwk 2 2] (2) is the disturbance attenuation level and y r (1), y r (2),, y r (N) are tracking commands which are assumed to be available over the future horizon N. In the following theorem, we introduce the existing result on the nite horizon H 1 -regulation problem the tracking commands y r = for 8 t. From now on, we substitute B 1 with B =?1 B 1 without loss of generality. Theorem 1 [6] When y r =, the dynamic game theory described by (1), (2) admits a unique feedback saddle-point solution, if and only if [I? B T M(t + 1)B ] > over t 2 [; N? 1] the sequence of M over t 2 [1; N] are generated by the following equation with M(N) = Q f : M = Q + A T M(t + 1)?1 A (3) = I + [B 2 B T 2??2 B 1 B T 1 ]M(t + 1) Then the unique saddle-point solution is given for t 2 [; N? 1] by u =?B T 2 M(t + 1)?1 Ax (4) w =?2 B T 1 M(t + 1)?1 Ax (5) Now in order to derive a nite horizon H 1 tracking control (HTC), we modify the notation shown in [1] as follows : Using, P = M[I? B (t? 1)B T (t? 1)M]?1 (6) (A? A 12A 22 A 21 )?1 = A 11? A 11 A 12 (A 21 A 11 A 12 +A?1 22 )?1 A 21 A 11 (7) and (I + )?1 = (I + )?1 (8) we can change (3)-(5) as follows: u =?[I + B T 2 P (t + 1)B 2 ]?1 B T 2 P (t + 1)Ax (9) w =?2 B T 1 [I + P (t + 1)B 2 B T 2 ]?1 P (t + 1)Ax (1) P = A T P (t + 1)A + P B (t? 1)[I + B T (t? 1)P B (t? 1)]?1 B T (t? 1)P?A T P (t + 1)B 2 [I + B T 2 P (t + 1) B 2 ]?1 B T 2 P (t + 1)A + Q (11) From the above modied equations, we derive the following result. Theorem 2 If and only if [I? B T r M(t + 1)B r ] > over t 2 [; N? 1], the unique saddle-point solution of HTC for discrete time-varying systems is given by u =?[I + B T 2 P (t + 1)B 2 ]?1 B T 2 [P (t + 1)Ax + g(t + 1)] (12) w =?2 B T 1 [I + P (t + 1)B 2 B T 2 ]?1 [P (t + 1)Ax + g(t + 1)] (13) g = [I + P B (t? 1)B T (t? 1)]fA T [I + P (t + 1)B 2 B T 2 ]?1 g(t + 1)? C T y r g g(n) =?fi + Q f B (N? 1)[I? B T (N? 1)Q f B (N? 1)]?1 B T (N? 1)gC T (N)F y r (N) P (N) = Q f [I? B (N? 1)B T (N? 1)Q f ]?1 Proof: It is well known that for a given p n (p n) full rank matrix C, there always exist some n p matrices L such that CL = I pp. Let ~x = Ly r. (2) is then rewritten with Q f = C T (N)F C(N) and Q = C T C as: N?1 X J = [x(n)? ~x(n)] T Q f [x(n)? ~x(n)] + t= We dene: x ^x = 1 A ^A = 1 ^Q = [(x? ~x) T Q(x? ~x) +kuk 2 2? 2 kwk 2 2] (14) B1 ; ^B1 = Q?C T y r?y T r C y T r y r Hence (1) and (14) are written as: B2 ; ^B2 = ; ^C = C?yr ^x(t + 1) = ^A^x + ^B1 w + ^B2 u(15) ^C^x ^z = ; ^Qf = u ^CT (N)F ^C(N) X N?1 J = ^x T (N) ^Qf ^x(n) + [^x T ^Q^x + kuk 2 2 t=? 2 kwk 2 2] (16) The dynamic game theory described by (15)-(16) admits a unique feedback saddle-point solution, if and
3 only if I? ^BT ^M(t + 1) ^B > over t 2 [; N? 1] [6], [7]. Let P P12 ^P = P12 T ; g = P P We know that [I? ^BT ^M(t + 1) ^B ] = [I? B T M(t + 1)B ]. Using (7)-(8), (12) and (13) are obtained from (9)-(11) with A, B 1, B 2, and P replaced by ^A, ^B1, ^B2, and ^P. 3 Stability of IHTC for discrete periodic systems Consider a generally time-varying matrix function L(). The symbol L () will denote a T -periodic matrix function such that L =L for t + T? 1 and L (t + T )=L for 8t. From the result of the previous section, we propose an intervalwise receding horizon H 1 -tracking control (IHTC) which stabilizes discrete T -periodic systems. Assume that N T + 1. Here N is both the cost horizon and the horizon that the tracking signal is given. Let the initial point be and Q f be the xed value. Among the solutions obtained over [; +N], we use the solutions over [; +T ]. Next the initial point moves to + T and the terminal point of the cost horizon moves to + T + N. This procedure repeats. Therefore P () is T-periodical. Let us make a T-periodic Riccati equation (T -PRE). We dene the following notations with k. E = A T P (t + 1)A? A T P (t + 1)B 2 [I +B T 2 P (t + 1)B 2 ]?1 B T 2 P (t + 1)A Q = Q + E( + T )? E() if t = + (k + 1)T Q otherwise Lemma 1 If A is nonsingular for 8t, Q () makes the solutions of the following Riccati equation T- periodic, i.e., it makes the following T -PRE. P = A T P (t + 1)A + Q? A T P (t + 1) B 2 [I + B T 2 P (t + 1)B 2 ]?1 B T 2 P (t + 1)A + P B (t? 1)[I + B T (t? 1) P B (t? 1)]?1 B T (t? 1)P (17) Proof: First, we will obtain the solutions over [ + 1; + N] from (11). Let the initial value be. Then from (17), we obtain at the terminal time t = T : P (T )? P (T )B (T? 1)[I + B T (T? 1)P (T ) B (T? 1)]?1 B T (T? 1)P (T )? Q (T ) = A T (T )P (T + 1)A(T )? A T (T )P (T + 1)B 2 (T )[I + B T 2 (T )P (T + 1)B 2 (T )]?1 B T 2 (T )P (T + 1)A(T ) (18) From the denition of Q (T ), the left side of (18) equals to E(). From (18), we observe that P (T +1) = P (1). Similarly P ((k + 1)T + i + 1) = P (i + 1) for k and i 2 [; T? 1]. Now the stabilizing property of the solution is derived in forward time, i.e., P +kt (). Consider a periodic matrix function X() with X(t+T )=X, and let the state feedback gain be?? =?[I + B T 2 X(t + 1)B 2 ]?1 B T 2 X(t+1)A Then, X() will be said to be stabilizing if the matrix A() + B 2 ()?() is asymptotically stable. If we replace P and Q with P +kt and Q +kt respectively, we obtain P +kt = F T k P +kt (t + 1)F k + Q +kt +K T k K k + P +kt B (t? 1) [I + B T (t? 1)P +kt B (t? 1)]?1 B T (t? 1)P +kt (19) K k =?[I + B T 2 P +kt (t + 1)B 2 ]?1 B T 2 P +kt (t + 1)A F k = A + B 2 K k Before stating the following theorem, we dene : = Q +kt + K T k K k + P +kt B (t? 1)[I + B T (t? 1)P +kt B (t? 1)]?1 B T (t? 1)P +kt (2) Theorem 3 y r over next N-horizon at + kt, i.e. [ + kt + 1; + kt + N] is given for k. Let P () be the solution of (11) and assume that 1) > or M?1 >?2 B 1 (t? 1)B T 1 (t? 1) on t 2 P [ + 1; + T ] +T 2) t= +1 > 3) (C(); A()) is completely observable 4) A is nonsingular for 8t Then, the periodic matrix functions P +kt () are stabilizing for each k. [I? B T M(t + 1)B > ] is satised from 1) since [I? B T M(t + 1)B ] = [I + B T P (t + 1)B ]?1. Proof: By (19) and (2), P +kt ( +1) can be denoted as follows: P +kt ( + 1) = T F k ( + 1)P +kt ( + T + 1) Fk ( + 1) + X+T t= +1 T F k (t; + 1) F k (t; + 1) F k ( + T; ) = F k ( + T? 1) F k ( + 1)F k (); Fk () = F k ( + T; ):
4 Let v be an eigenvector of Fk ( + 1) associated with the eigenvalue. Then we obtain: (1? jj 2 )v P +kt ( + 1)v = X+T t= +1 v T F k (t; + 1) F k (t; + 1)v From the assumption, we observe that all characteristic multipliers of Fk ( + 1) belong to the open-unit disk. Therefore P +kt () is stabilizing [2]. Let us consider the assumptions 1) and 2) of Theorem 3. The assumption 2) seems not to be a strong condition. In LQ problems, it is well known that P () > under some basic conditions such as controllability and observability conditions. But in H 1 - problems, no proper condition satisfying P () > has been found. In Section 6, it will be shown that quite a small satises 1). Consider discrete time-invariant systems. A discrete time-invariant system as shown in [2] can be viewed as a periodic system of an arbitrary period. Then, we can derive a time-invariant version of Theorem 3. Corollary 1 Let P () be the solution of (11) for discrete time-invariant systems with 3) and 4) of Theorem 3. If there exists an integer T such that: 1) P > or M?1 >?2 B 1 B T 1 on [ + 1; + T ] +T 2) t= +1 > then, the T -periodic matrix functions P kt () are stabilizing for each k 4 The stabilizing IHTC with integral action In this section, we investigate the zero oset property of the proposed stabilizing IHTC when the tracking command is constant and the system is time-invariant. It is well known that such a property can be obtained by introducing the following incremental state-space model: x e (t + 1) = A e x e + B 1e w + B 2e u(21) y = C e x e Ce x z = e yr I CA ; z u r = ; A e = A y x e = ; B x 1e = CB1 ; B B 2e 1 = CB2 B 2 C e = I The dynamic game theory based on the (21) gives the following control: u =?[I + B T 2e P e(t + 1)B 2e ]?1 B T 2e[P e (t + 1) A e x e + g e (t + 1)] (22) P e () and g e () are obtained from (11) and g of Section 2 with A, B, and C replaced by A e, B e, and C e. It is noted that the IHTC based on the incremental control u in (22) is stabilizing from Theorem 3 in the previous section. Now we will show that the stabilizing IHTC with integral action provides the zero oset. Corollary 2 The stabilizing IHTC with integral action provides the zero oset. proof: g e is derived similarly to [1]: g e =? T e (T + 1; t + 1)C T e F y r? TX j=t+1 [ T e (j; t + 1)B ce (j? 1)C T e y r]; t 2 [1; T? 1] e (t; t ) = A ce (t? 1)A ce (t? 1) A ce (t ) A ce = [I + B 2e B2e T P e]?1 A e [I + B e Be T P e(t? 1)] B ce = [I + P e B e B e ]?1 ; B e =?1 B 1e Now, we demonstrate the following fact: P e I e = T e (T + 1; t + 1)C T e F + TX j=t+1 [ T e (j; t + 1) B ce (j? 1)C T e ]; t 2 [1; T ] (23) Dene with H T (i; t + 1) = e (i; t + 1): G = H T T (T + 1; t + 1)C T e F + TX B ce (j? 1)C T e ; j=t+1 [H T T (j; t + 1) If t = T, it is clear that P e (T )I e = G(T ). Assuming that (23) is true when t = n + 1, we obtain: P e (n + 1)I e = G(n + 1) Let t = n then TX = H T T (T + 1; n + 2)C T e F + j=n+2 [H T T (j; n + 2)B ce (j? 1)C T e ] P e (n)i e = A T e fi? P e(n + 1)B 2e [I + B T 2e P e(n + 1) B 2e ]?1 B T 2egP e (n + 1)I e + C T e + P e (n) B e [I + B T e P e(n)b e ]?1 B T e P e(n)i e TX = H T T (T + 1; n + 1)C T e F + j=n+1 = G(n) [H T T (j; n + 1)B ce (j? 1)C T e ]
5 This means that (23) is true. Using this fact, the control u can be written with e = y? y r as u =?[I + B T 2e P e(t + 1)B 2e ]?1 B T 2e P e(t + 1)A e [e x] T (24) If we dene x E = [e x] T, we get x E = A e x E + B 1e w + B 2e u e = C e x E Since the above system is stable with the control (24), e! as t! 1, which means y! y r. 5 The H 1 -norm bound of the stabilizing IHTC In this section, we show that the stabilizing IHTC guarantees the H 1 -norm bound when y r () =. Theorem 4 Assume that E( + T )-E(). With the stabilizing IHTC u, the H 1 -norm bound of the closed-loop system is guaranteed, i.e., kt zw k 1 < (25) proof: Here for convenience, we denote P +kt ; M +kt ; F k ; and Q +kt as P ; M; F, and Q each other. By assumption, M >. Therefore?x T ()M()x() < 1X t= [x T (t + 1)M(t + 1)x(t + 1)?x T Mx] (26) Let = x T (t + 1)M(t + 1)x(t + 1)? x T Mx. Then, = [F x + B 1 w] T M(t + 1)[F x +B 1 w]? x T Mx = x T [X + Y ]x? W T [I? B T M(t + 1)B ]W + 2 w T w W = w? [I? B T M(t + 1)B ]?1 B T M(t + 1)F x X = F T M(t + 1)F? M Y = F T M(t + 1)B [I? B T By (6) and (7), M(t + 1)B ]?1 B T M(t + 1)F [I? B T M(t + 1)B ]?1 = I + B T P (t + 1)B (27) By (6) and (27), X and Y can be written as follows: X = F T P (t + 1)F? M? F T P (t + 1)B [I + B T P (t + 1)B ]?1 B T P (t + 1)F Y = F T fi? P (t + 1)B [I + B T P (t + 1)B ]?1 Denoting B T gp (t + 1)B [I + B T P (t + 1)B ] B T P (t + 1)fI? B [I + B T P (t + 1) B ]?1 B T P (t + 1)gF = B T P (t + 1)B = B T P (t + 1)F?F T P (t + 1)B [I + B T P (t + 1)B ]?1 B T P (t + 1)F + Y = T [?(I + )?1 + (I? (I + )?1 )(I + )(I? (I + )?1 )] = using = ( + I? I) (28) Using (19) and (28), X+Y =? Q?K T k K k Therefore =?x T [ Q + kkk k 2 2]x? W T [I? B T M(t + 1)B ]W + 2 kwk 2 2 <?x T [ Q + kkk k 2 2]x + 2 kwk 2 2?z T z + 2 kwk 2 2 (29) When x() =, we know from the relations of (26) and (29) that (25) is satised. 6 Simulation studies We demonstrate the properties of the proposed IHTC through simulation studies. the tracking performance of IHTC is compared with that of RHTC which is known to show good performances. [1]. We consider the following T -periodic system matrices: 1 + :1 B 1 = A = :9 + :9 C = q + :1q :1 + :1 :7 + :7 ; B 2 = :2 + :2 :8 + :8 :1q = cos( 2t T ); q is tuning parameter; F = 1; R = I(RHT C):
6 the external disturbances. Another advantage is that computation burdens are lessened and the IHTC can easily applied to real-time tracking systems In this simulation we assume that T = 2 and = :7. Using these values, we obtain a stabilizing IHTC. We make the values of disturbance as multiplying 2% of the tracking command by random signal which has a normal distribution between?:5 and :5. We select the cost horizon as T + 1 for the both cases of IHTC and RHTC. Fig.1 shows outputs of IHTC and RHTC for the given command signal. Fig.2 shows the dierence between the output and the command signal. In Fig.1, solid curve represents the tracking command. In Fig.1-Fig.2, '.' represents the result of IHTC and '{' represents the result of RHTC. Fig.1 and Fig.2 show that the performance of IHTC is better than that of RHTC. This result is also the same as that when there is no disturbance. If we increase the cost horizon, the performance of RHTC becomes better. Also in that case, the performance of IHTC is also a little better than that of RHTC. The results for time-invariant systems are similar to those for T- periodic systems. 7 Conclusion In this paper, a xed nite horizon H 1 -tracking control (HTC) for discrete time-varying systems is rst derived. And then, an intervalwise receding horizon H 1 -tracking control (IHTC) is proposed for discrete periodic systems. It is shown that the proposed IHTC guarantees closed loop stability, innite horizon H 1 - norm bound, and zero oset tracking error under the proposed conditions. Through the example, it is shown that the performance of the proposed IHTC presents better tracking performance than the existing pointwise receding horizon control which is proposed in [1]. Specially when the cost horizon is near the system order, the performance of IHTC is shown to be very good compared with that of the pointwise one for some systems. References [1] I. Yaesh and U. Shaked, "Minimum H1 Norm Regulation of Linear Discrete-Time Systems and Its Relation to Linear Quadratic Discrete Games," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-35, pp , 199. [2] G. D. Nicolao, "Cyclomonotonicity and Stabilizability Properties of Solutions of the Dierence Periodic Riccati Equation," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-37, pp , [3] G. D. Nicolao and S. Strada, "What is the easiest way to stabilize a Linear Periodic System," ECC95., [4] U. Shaked and C. E. DeSouza, "Continuous-Time Tracking Problems in an H 1 Setting:A Game Theory Approach," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-4, pp , [5] A. Cohen and U. Shaked, "Linear Discrete-Time H 1 -Optimal Tracking with Preview," Pro. of the 34th CDC, New Orleans, LA, pp , December [6] T. Basar and P. Bernhard, "H 1 -Optimal Control and Related Minimax Design Problems : A Dynamic Game Approach," Birkhauser Boston Basel Berlin, [7] T. Basar, "A Dynamic Games Approach to Controller Design: Disturbance Rejection in Discrete- Time," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-36, pp , [8] W. H. Kwon and A. E. Pearson, "On Feedback Stabilization of Time-Varying Discrete Linear Systems," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-23, no. 3, pp , [9] W. H. Kwon and A. E. Pearson, "Linear Systems with Two-Point Boundary Lyapunov and Riccati Equations," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. AC-25, no. 2, [1] W. H. Kwon and D. G. Byun, "Receding horizon tracking control as a predictive control and its stability properties," Int.J.Control., vol. 5, no. 5, pp , [11] Sanjay Lall and Keith Glover, "A game theoretic approach to moving horizon control," Oxford University Press., Edited by David Clarke, One of the advantages of the proposed IHTC is that it can show very good tracking performance in spite of
H 1 optimisation. Is hoped that the practical advantages of receding horizon control might be combined with the robustness advantages of H 1 control.
A game theoretic approach to moving horizon control Sanjay Lall and Keith Glover Abstract A control law is constructed for a linear time varying system by solving a two player zero sum dierential game
More informationLinear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard June 15, 2013
Linear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard June 15, 2013 Abstract As in optimal control theory, linear quadratic (LQ) differential games (DG) can be solved, even in high dimension,
More information1 Introduction 198; Dugard et al, 198; Dugard et al, 198) A delay matrix in such a lower triangular form is called an interactor matrix, and almost co
Multivariable Receding-Horizon Predictive Control for Adaptive Applications Tae-Woong Yoon and C M Chow y Department of Electrical Engineering, Korea University 1, -a, Anam-dong, Sungbu-u, Seoul 1-1, Korea
More informationTime-Invariant Linear Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 2015
Time-Invariant Linear Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 15 Asymptotic approach from time-varying to constant gains Elimination of cross weighting
More informationDecentralized control with input saturation
Decentralized control with input saturation Ciprian Deliu Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Technical University Eindhoven Eindhoven, The Netherlands November 2006 Decentralized control with
More informationTime-Invariant Linear Quadratic Regulators!
Time-Invariant Linear Quadratic Regulators Robert Stengel Optimal Control and Estimation MAE 546 Princeton University, 17 Asymptotic approach from time-varying to constant gains Elimination of cross weighting
More informationAn LQ R weight selection approach to the discrete generalized H 2 control problem
INT. J. CONTROL, 1998, VOL. 71, NO. 1, 93± 11 An LQ R weight selection approach to the discrete generalized H 2 control problem D. A. WILSON², M. A. NEKOUI² and G. D. HALIKIAS² It is known that a generalized
More informationLinear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games
Linear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games Pierre Bernhard To cite this version: Pierre Bernhard. Linear Quadratic Zero-Sum Two-Person Differential Games. Encyclopaedia of Systems and Control,
More informationBUMPLESS SWITCHING CONTROLLERS. William A. Wolovich and Alan B. Arehart 1. December 27, Abstract
BUMPLESS SWITCHING CONTROLLERS William A. Wolovich and Alan B. Arehart 1 December 7, 1995 Abstract This paper outlines the design of bumpless switching controllers that can be used to stabilize MIMO plants
More informationApplications of Controlled Invariance to the l 1 Optimal Control Problem
Applications of Controlled Invariance to the l 1 Optimal Control Problem Carlos E.T. Dórea and Jean-Claude Hennet LAAS-CNRS 7, Ave. du Colonel Roche, 31077 Toulouse Cédex 4, FRANCE Phone : (+33) 61 33
More informationFIR Filters for Stationary State Space Signal Models
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress The International Federation of Automatic Control FIR Filters for Stationary State Space Signal Models Jung Hun Park Wook Hyun Kwon School of Electrical Engineering
More informationThe norms can also be characterized in terms of Riccati inequalities.
9 Analysis of stability and H norms Consider the causal, linear, time-invariant system ẋ(t = Ax(t + Bu(t y(t = Cx(t Denote the transfer function G(s := C (si A 1 B. Theorem 85 The following statements
More informationSUCCESSIVE POLE SHIFTING USING SAMPLED-DATA LQ REGULATORS. Sigeru Omatu
SUCCESSIVE POLE SHIFING USING SAMPLED-DAA LQ REGULAORS oru Fujinaka Sigeru Omatu Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka Prefecture University, 1-1 Gakuen-cho, Sakai, 599-8531 Japan Abstract: Design of sampled-data
More informationFINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES. Danlei Chu, Tongwen Chen, Horacio J. Marquez
FINITE HORIZON ROBUST MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL USING LINEAR MATRIX INEQUALITIES Danlei Chu Tongwen Chen Horacio J Marquez Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alberta Edmonton
More informationNew Lyapunov Krasovskii functionals for stability of linear retarded and neutral type systems
Systems & Control Letters 43 (21 39 319 www.elsevier.com/locate/sysconle New Lyapunov Krasovskii functionals for stability of linear retarded and neutral type systems E. Fridman Department of Electrical
More informationonly nite eigenvalues. This is an extension of earlier results from [2]. Then we concentrate on the Riccati equation appearing in H 2 and linear quadr
The discrete algebraic Riccati equation and linear matrix inequality nton. Stoorvogel y Department of Mathematics and Computing Science Eindhoven Univ. of Technology P.O. ox 53, 56 M Eindhoven The Netherlands
More informationINVERSE MODEL APPROACH TO DISTURBANCE REJECTION AND DECOUPLING CONTROLLER DESIGN. Leonid Lyubchyk
CINVESTAV Department of Automatic Control November 3, 20 INVERSE MODEL APPROACH TO DISTURBANCE REJECTION AND DECOUPLING CONTROLLER DESIGN Leonid Lyubchyk National Technical University of Ukraine Kharkov
More informationDelay-Dependent Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Multiple Time Delays
Delay-Dependent Stability Criteria for Linear Systems with Multiple Time Delays Yong He, Min Wu, Jin-Hua She Abstract This paper deals with the problem of the delay-dependent stability of linear systems
More informationVector Space Basics. 1 Abstract Vector Spaces. 1. (commutativity of vector addition) u + v = v + u. 2. (associativity of vector addition)
Vector Space Basics (Remark: these notes are highly formal and may be a useful reference to some students however I am also posting Ray Heitmann's notes to Canvas for students interested in a direct computational
More informationA lifting approach. Control Engineering Laboratory. lifted time-invariant system description without causality
State-space solution to the periodic multirate H control problem: A lifting approach Mats F. Sagfors Hannu T. Toivonen Department of Chemical Engineering, Abo Akademi University, FIN{25 Abo, FINLAND msagfors@abo.fi,
More informationStochastic Nonlinear Stabilization Part II: Inverse Optimality Hua Deng and Miroslav Krstic Department of Mechanical Engineering h
Stochastic Nonlinear Stabilization Part II: Inverse Optimality Hua Deng and Miroslav Krstic Department of Mechanical Engineering denghua@eng.umd.edu http://www.engr.umd.edu/~denghua/ University of Maryland
More informationUCLA Chemical Engineering. Process & Control Systems Engineering Laboratory
Constrained Innite-Time Nonlinear Quadratic Optimal Control V. Manousiouthakis D. Chmielewski Chemical Engineering Department UCLA 1998 AIChE Annual Meeting Outline Unconstrained Innite-Time Nonlinear
More informationRobust sampled-data stabilization of linear systems: an input delay approach
Automatica 40 (004) 44 446 www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Technical Communique Robust sampled-data stabilization of linear systems: an input delay approach Emilia Fridman a;, Alexandre Seuret b, Jean-Pierre
More informationGeneralized Riccati Equations Arising in Stochastic Games
Generalized Riccati Equations Arising in Stochastic Games Michael McAsey a a Department of Mathematics Bradley University Peoria IL 61625 USA mcasey@bradley.edu Libin Mou b b Department of Mathematics
More informationIntrinsic diculties in using the. control theory. 1. Abstract. We point out that the natural denitions of stability and
Intrinsic diculties in using the doubly-innite time axis for input-output control theory. Tryphon T. Georgiou 2 and Malcolm C. Smith 3 Abstract. We point out that the natural denitions of stability and
More informationStatic Output Feedback Stabilisation with H Performance for a Class of Plants
Static Output Feedback Stabilisation with H Performance for a Class of Plants E. Prempain and I. Postlethwaite Control and Instrumentation Research, Department of Engineering, University of Leicester,
More informationIMPROVED MPC DESIGN BASED ON SATURATING CONTROL LAWS
IMPROVED MPC DESIGN BASED ON SATURATING CONTROL LAWS D. Limon, J.M. Gomes da Silva Jr., T. Alamo and E.F. Camacho Dpto. de Ingenieria de Sistemas y Automática. Universidad de Sevilla Camino de los Descubrimientos
More informationA Globally Stabilizing Receding Horizon Controller for Neutrally Stable Linear Systems with Input Constraints 1
A Globally Stabilizing Receding Horizon Controller for Neutrally Stable Linear Systems with Input Constraints 1 Ali Jadbabaie, Claudio De Persis, and Tae-Woong Yoon 2 Department of Electrical Engineering
More informationChapter III. Stability of Linear Systems
1 Chapter III Stability of Linear Systems 1. Stability and state transition matrix 2. Time-varying (non-autonomous) systems 3. Time-invariant systems 1 STABILITY AND STATE TRANSITION MATRIX 2 In this chapter,
More informationEects of small delays on stability of singularly perturbed systems
Automatica 38 (2002) 897 902 www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Technical Communique Eects of small delays on stability of singularly perturbed systems Emilia Fridman Department of Electrical Engineering
More informationDelay-Dependent H 1 Control of Uncertain Discrete Delay Systems
European Journal of Control ():9 # EUCA Delay-Dependent H Control of Uncertain Discrete Delay Systems E. Fridman and U. Shaked Department of Electrical Engineering-Systems Tel-Aviv University Tel-Aviv
More informationCONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING
Chapter 5 CONTROL DESIGN FOR SET POINT TRACKING In this chapter, we extend the pole placement, observer-based output feedback design to solve tracking problems. By tracking we mean that the output is commanded
More informationLecture 2: Discrete-time Linear Quadratic Optimal Control
ME 33, U Berkeley, Spring 04 Xu hen Lecture : Discrete-time Linear Quadratic Optimal ontrol Big picture Example onvergence of finite-time LQ solutions Big picture previously: dynamic programming and finite-horizon
More informationProblem Description The problem we consider is stabilization of a single-input multiple-state system with simultaneous magnitude and rate saturations,
SEMI-GLOBAL RESULTS ON STABILIZATION OF LINEAR SYSTEMS WITH INPUT RATE AND MAGNITUDE SATURATIONS Trygve Lauvdal and Thor I. Fossen y Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7 Trondheim, NORWAY.
More informationChapter 7 Interconnected Systems and Feedback: Well-Posedness, Stability, and Performance 7. Introduction Feedback control is a powerful approach to o
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of Technology c Chapter 7 Interconnected
More informationLet T (N) be the algebra of all bounded linear operators of a Hilbert space L which leave invariant every subspace N in N, i.e., A T (N), AN N.
2009 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 10-12, 2009 FrA04.4 Commutant Lifting for Linear Time-Varying Systems Seddik M. Djouadi Abstract In this paper, we study
More informationChapter 8 Stabilization: State Feedback 8. Introduction: Stabilization One reason feedback control systems are designed is to stabilize systems that m
Lectures on Dynamic Systems and Control Mohammed Dahleh Munther A. Dahleh George Verghese Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Massachuasetts Institute of echnology c Chapter 8 Stabilization:
More informationState-Feedback Optimal Controllers for Deterministic Nonlinear Systems
State-Feedback Optimal Controllers for Deterministic Nonlinear Systems Chang-Hee Won*, Abstract A full-state feedback optimal control problem is solved for a general deterministic nonlinear system. The
More informationH -Optimal Control and Related Minimax Design Problems
Tamer Başar Pierre Bernhard H -Optimal Control and Related Minimax Design Problems A Dynamic Game Approach Second Edition 1995 Birkhäuser Boston Basel Berlin Contents Preface v 1 A General Introduction
More informationStability Analysis and H Synthesis for Linear Systems With Time-Varying Delays
Stability Analysis and H Synthesis for Linear Systems With Time-Varying Delays Anke Xue Yong-Yan Cao and Daoying Pi Abstract This paper is devoted to stability analysis and synthesis of the linear systems
More information6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control
6.241 Dynamic Systems and Control Lecture 24: H2 Synthesis Emilio Frazzoli Aeronautics and Astronautics Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 4, 2011 E. Frazzoli (MIT) Lecture 24: H 2 Synthesis May
More informationA New Algorithm for Solving Cross Coupled Algebraic Riccati Equations of Singularly Perturbed Nash Games
A New Algorithm for Solving Cross Coupled Algebraic Riccati Equations of Singularly Perturbed Nash Games Hiroaki Mukaidani Hua Xu and Koichi Mizukami Faculty of Information Sciences Hiroshima City University
More informationBenchmark problems in stability and design of. switched systems. Daniel Liberzon and A. Stephen Morse. Department of Electrical Engineering
Benchmark problems in stability and design of switched systems Daniel Liberzon and A. Stephen Morse Department of Electrical Engineering Yale University New Haven, CT 06520-8267 fliberzon, morseg@sysc.eng.yale.edu
More informationAbstract. Previous characterizations of iss-stability are shown to generalize without change to the
On Characterizations of Input-to-State Stability with Respect to Compact Sets Eduardo D. Sontag and Yuan Wang Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA Department of Mathematics,
More informationProc. 9th IFAC/IFORS/IMACS/IFIP/ Symposium on Large Scale Systems: Theory and Applications (LSS 2001), 2001, pp
INVARIANT POLYHEDRA AND CONTROL OF LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS Jean-Claude Hennet LAAS - CNRS 7, Avenue du Colonel Roche, 31077 Toulouse Cedex 4, FRANCE PHONE: (+33) 5 61 33 63 13, FAX: (+33) 5 61 33 69 36, e-mail:
More informationAverage Reward Parameters
Simulation-Based Optimization of Markov Reward Processes: Implementation Issues Peter Marbach 2 John N. Tsitsiklis 3 Abstract We consider discrete time, nite state space Markov reward processes which depend
More informationLecture 2: Review of Prerequisites. Table of contents
Math 348 Fall 217 Lecture 2: Review of Prerequisites Disclaimer. As we have a textbook, this lecture note is for guidance and supplement only. It should not be relied on when preparing for exams. In this
More informationNonlinear Model Predictive Control for Periodic Systems using LMIs
Marcus Reble Christoph Böhm Fran Allgöwer Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Periodic Systems using LMIs Stuttgart, June 29 Institute for Systems Theory and Automatic Control (IST), University of Stuttgart,
More informationReduced rank regression in cointegrated models
Journal of Econometrics 06 (2002) 203 26 www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase Reduced rank regression in cointegrated models.w. Anderson Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4065,
More information1. Introduction Let the least value of an objective function F (x), x2r n, be required, where F (x) can be calculated for any vector of variables x2r
DAMTP 2002/NA08 Least Frobenius norm updating of quadratic models that satisfy interpolation conditions 1 M.J.D. Powell Abstract: Quadratic models of objective functions are highly useful in many optimization
More informationNotes on the matrix exponential
Notes on the matrix exponential Erik Wahlén erik.wahlen@math.lu.se February 14, 212 1 Introduction The purpose of these notes is to describe how one can compute the matrix exponential e A when A is not
More informationA converse Lyapunov theorem for discrete-time systems with disturbances
Systems & Control Letters 45 (2002) 49 58 www.elsevier.com/locate/sysconle A converse Lyapunov theorem for discrete-time systems with disturbances Zhong-Ping Jiang a; ; 1, Yuan Wang b; 2 a Department of
More informationIntroduction to Model Predictive Control. Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione
Introduction to Model Predictive Control Riccardo Scattolini Riccardo Scattolini Dipartimento di Elettronica e Informazione Finite horizon optimal control 2 Consider the system At time k we want to compute
More informationVII Selected Topics. 28 Matrix Operations
VII Selected Topics Matrix Operations Linear Programming Number Theoretic Algorithms Polynomials and the FFT Approximation Algorithms 28 Matrix Operations We focus on how to multiply matrices and solve
More informationIn: Proc. BENELEARN-98, 8th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Machine Learning, pp 9-46, 998 Linear Quadratic Regulation using Reinforcement Learning Stephan ten Hagen? and Ben Krose Department of Mathematics,
More informationMODERN CONTROL DESIGN
CHAPTER 8 MODERN CONTROL DESIGN The classical design techniques of Chapters 6 and 7 are based on the root-locus and frequency response that utilize only the plant output for feedback with a dynamic controller
More informationQuasigroups and Related Systems 8 (2001), Hee Kon Park and Hee Sik Kim. Abstract. 1. Introduction
Quasigroups and Related Systems 8 (2001), 67 72 On quadratic B-algebras Hee Kon Park and Hee Sik Kim Abstract In this paper we introduce the notion of quadratic B-algebra which is a medial quasigroup,
More informationFloor Control (kn) Time (sec) Floor 5. Displacement (mm) Time (sec) Floor 5.
DECENTRALIZED ROBUST H CONTROL OF MECHANICAL STRUCTURES. Introduction L. Bakule and J. Böhm Institute of Information Theory and Automation Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic The results contributed
More informationA Stable Block Model Predictive Control with Variable Implementation Horizon
American Control Conference June 8-,. Portland, OR, USA WeB9. A Stable Block Model Predictive Control with Variable Implementation Horizon Jing Sun, Shuhao Chen, Ilya Kolmanovsky Abstract In this paper,
More informationHere, u is the control input with m components, y is the measured output with k componenets, and the channels w j z j from disturbance inputs to contr
From Mixed to Multi-Objective ontrol arsten W. Scherer Mechanical Engineering Systems and ontrol Group Delft University of Technology Mekelweg, 8 D Delft, The Netherlands Paper ID: Reg Abstract. We revisit
More informationNull controllable region of LTI discrete-time systems with input saturation
Automatica 38 (2002) 2009 2013 www.elsevier.com/locate/automatica Technical Communique Null controllable region of LTI discrete-time systems with input saturation Tingshu Hu a;, Daniel E. Miller b,liqiu
More informationCircuit depth relative to a random oracle. Peter Bro Miltersen. Aarhus University, Computer Science Department
Circuit depth relative to a random oracle Peter Bro Miltersen Aarhus University, Computer Science Department Ny Munkegade, DK 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. pbmiltersen@daimi.aau.dk Keywords: Computational complexity,
More informationPARAMETER IDENTIFICATION IN THE FREQUENCY DOMAIN. H.T. Banks and Yun Wang. Center for Research in Scientic Computation
PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION IN THE FREQUENCY DOMAIN H.T. Banks and Yun Wang Center for Research in Scientic Computation North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC 7695-805 Revised: March 1993 Abstract In
More informationDigital Control Engineering Analysis and Design
Digital Control Engineering Analysis and Design M. Sami Fadali Antonio Visioli AMSTERDAM BOSTON HEIDELBERG LONDON NEW YORK OXFORD PARIS SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO Academic Press is
More informationThe model reduction algorithm proposed is based on an iterative two-step LMI scheme. The convergence of the algorithm is not analyzed but examples sho
Model Reduction from an H 1 /LMI perspective A. Helmersson Department of Electrical Engineering Linkoping University S-581 8 Linkoping, Sweden tel: +6 1 816 fax: +6 1 86 email: andersh@isy.liu.se September
More informationControllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control
Multivariable Control Lecture 4 Controllability, Observability, Full State Feedback, Observer Based Control John T. Wen September 13, 24 Ref: 3.2-3.4 of Text Controllability ẋ = Ax + Bu; x() = x. At time
More informationOn robustness of suboptimal min-max model predictive control *
Manuscript received June 5, 007; revised Sep., 007 On robustness of suboptimal min-max model predictive control * DE-FENG HE, HAI-BO JI, TAO ZHENG Department of Automation University of Science and Technology
More informationJ. Korean Math. Soc. 37 (2000), No. 4, pp. 593{611 STABILITY AND CONSTRAINED CONTROLLABILITY OF LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS IN BANACH SPACES Vu Ngoc Phat,
J. Korean Math. Soc. 37 (2), No. 4, pp. 593{611 STABILITY AND CONSTRAINED CONTROLLABILITY OF LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS IN BANACH SPACES Vu Ngoc Phat, Jong Yeoul Park, and Il Hyo Jung Abstract. For linear
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationFilter Design for Linear Time Delay Systems
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 49, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2001 2839 ANewH Filter Design for Linear Time Delay Systems E. Fridman Uri Shaked, Fellow, IEEE Abstract A new delay-dependent filtering
More information1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system. 2 α 1 1
Appendix B Revision Problems 1. Find the solution of the following uncontrolled linear system 0 1 1 ẋ = x, x(0) =. 2 3 1 Class test, August 1998 2. Given the linear system described by 2 α 1 1 ẋ = x +
More informationAn important method in stability and ISS analysis of continuous-time systems is based on the use class-kl and class-k functions (for classical results
Formulas relating KL stability estimates of discrete-time and sampled-data nonlinear systems D. Nesic Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052,
More informationUCLA Chemical Engineering. Process & Control Systems Engineering Laboratory
Constrained Innite-time Optimal Control Donald J. Chmielewski Chemical Engineering Department University of California Los Angeles February 23, 2000 Stochastic Formulation - Min Max Formulation - UCLA
More informationDe Nugis Groebnerialium 5: Noether, Macaulay, Jordan
De Nugis Groebnerialium 5: Noether, Macaulay, Jordan ACA 2018 Santiago de Compostela Re-reading Macaulay References Macaulay F. S., On the Resolution of a given Modular System into Primary Systems including
More informationLearning Model Predictive Control for Iterative Tasks: A Computationally Efficient Approach for Linear System
Learning Model Predictive Control for Iterative Tasks: A Computationally Efficient Approach for Linear System Ugo Rosolia Francesco Borrelli University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94701, USA
More informationMin-Max Output Integral Sliding Mode Control for Multiplant Linear Uncertain Systems
Proceedings of the 27 American Control Conference Marriott Marquis Hotel at Times Square New York City, USA, July -3, 27 FrC.4 Min-Max Output Integral Sliding Mode Control for Multiplant Linear Uncertain
More informationApproximate Bisimulations for Constrained Linear Systems
Approximate Bisimulations for Constrained Linear Systems Antoine Girard and George J Pappas Abstract In this paper, inspired by exact notions of bisimulation equivalence for discrete-event and continuous-time
More informationLMI based output-feedback controllers: γ-optimal versus linear quadratic.
Proceedings of the 17th World Congress he International Federation of Automatic Control Seoul Korea July 6-11 28 LMI based output-feedback controllers: γ-optimal versus linear quadratic. Dmitry V. Balandin
More informationIMPULSIVE CONTROL OF DISCRETE-TIME NETWORKED SYSTEMS WITH COMMUNICATION DELAYS. Shumei Mu, Tianguang Chu, and Long Wang
IMPULSIVE CONTROL OF DISCRETE-TIME NETWORKED SYSTEMS WITH COMMUNICATION DELAYS Shumei Mu Tianguang Chu and Long Wang Intelligent Control Laboratory Center for Systems and Control Department of Mechanics
More information4F3 - Predictive Control
4F3 Predictive Control - Lecture 2 p 1/23 4F3 - Predictive Control Lecture 2 - Unconstrained Predictive Control Jan Maciejowski jmm@engcamacuk 4F3 Predictive Control - Lecture 2 p 2/23 References Predictive
More informationBlock companion matrices, discrete-time block diagonal stability and polynomial matrices
Block companion matrices, discrete-time block diagonal stability and polynomial matrices Harald K. Wimmer Mathematisches Institut Universität Würzburg D-97074 Würzburg Germany October 25, 2008 Abstract
More informationESC794: Special Topics: Model Predictive Control
ESC794: Special Topics: Model Predictive Control Discrete-Time Systems Hanz Richter, Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Cleveland State University Discrete-Time vs. Sampled-Data Systems A continuous-time
More informationStability Analysis of a Proportional with Intermittent Integral Control System
American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront, Baltimore, MD, USA June 3-July, ThB4. Stability Analysis of a Proportional with Intermittent Integral Control System Jin Lu and Lyndon J. Brown Abstract
More informationStability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization
Stability, Pole Placement, Observers and Stabilization 1 1, The Netherlands DISC Course Mathematical Models of Systems Outline 1 Stability of autonomous systems 2 The pole placement problem 3 Stabilization
More information2 The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR)
2 The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) Problem: Compute a state feedback controller u(t) = Kx(t) that stabilizes the closed loop system and minimizes J := 0 x(t) T Qx(t)+u(t) T Ru(t)dt where x and u are
More informationFunctions: A Fourier Approach. Universitat Rostock. Germany. Dedicated to Prof. L. Berg on the occasion of his 65th birthday.
Approximation Properties of Multi{Scaling Functions: A Fourier Approach Gerlind Plona Fachbereich Mathemati Universitat Rostoc 1851 Rostoc Germany Dedicated to Prof. L. Berg on the occasion of his 65th
More informationA note on continuous behavior homomorphisms
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Systems & Control Letters 49 (2003) 359 363 www.elsevier.com/locate/sysconle A note on continuous behavior homomorphisms P.A. Fuhrmann 1 Department of Mathematics,
More informationCONSTRAINED MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL ON CONVEX POLYHEDRON STOCHASTIC LINEAR PARAMETER VARYING SYSTEMS. Received October 2012; revised February 2013
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2013 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 9, Number 10, October 2013 pp 4193 4204 CONSTRAINED MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL ON CONVEX
More information1 Introduction We study innite-dimensional systems that can formally be written in the familiar form x 0 (t) = Ax(t) + Bu(t); y(t) = Cx(t) + Du(t); t
Quadratic Optimal Control of Regular Well-Posed Linear Systems, with Applications to Parabolic Equations Olof J. Staans Abo Akademi University Department of Mathematics FIN-20500 Abo, Finland Olof.Staans@abo.
More informationModel reduction for linear systems by balancing
Model reduction for linear systems by balancing Bart Besselink Jan C. Willems Center for Systems and Control Johann Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science University of Groningen, Groningen,
More informationELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS. 1. Linear Equations and Matrices
ELEMENTARY LINEAR ALGEBRA WITH APPLICATIONS KOLMAN & HILL NOTES BY OTTO MUTZBAUER 11 Systems of Linear Equations 1 Linear Equations and Matrices Numbers in our context are either real numbers or complex
More informationOutput Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationRiccati difference equations to non linear extended Kalman filter constraints
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 3, Issue 12, December-2012 1 Riccati difference equations to non linear extended Kalman filter constraints Abstract Elizabeth.S 1 & Jothilakshmi.R
More informationAdaptive linear quadratic control using policy. iteration. Steven J. Bradtke. University of Massachusetts.
Adaptive linear quadratic control using policy iteration Steven J. Bradtke Computer Science Department University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 bradtke@cs.umass.edu B. Erik Ydstie Department of Chemical
More informationREGLERTEKNIK AUTOMATIC CONTROL LINKÖPING
Invariant Sets for a Class of Hybrid Systems Mats Jirstrand Department of Electrical Engineering Linkoping University, S-581 83 Linkoping, Sweden WWW: http://www.control.isy.liu.se Email: matsj@isy.liu.se
More informationDisturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback
Disturbance Attenuation for a Class of Nonlinear Systems by Output Feedback Wei in Chunjiang Qian and Xianqing Huang Submitted to Systems & Control etters /5/ Abstract This paper studies the problem of
More information1 Introduction It will be convenient to use the inx operators a b and a b to stand for maximum (least upper bound) and minimum (greatest lower bound)
Cycle times and xed points of min-max functions Jeremy Gunawardena, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. jeremy@cs.stanford.edu October 11, 1993 to appear in the
More informationLyapunov Stability Theory
Lyapunov Stability Theory Peter Al Hokayem and Eduardo Gallestey March 16, 2015 1 Introduction In this lecture we consider the stability of equilibrium points of autonomous nonlinear systems, both in continuous
More informationFall 線性系統 Linear Systems. Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian. NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08
Fall 2007 線性系統 Linear Systems Chapter 08 State Feedback & State Estimators (SISO) Feng-Li Lian NTU-EE Sep07 Jan08 Materials used in these lecture notes are adopted from Linear System Theory & Design, 3rd.
More information16.31 Fall 2005 Lecture Presentation Mon 31-Oct-05 ver 1.1
16.31 Fall 2005 Lecture Presentation Mon 31-Oct-05 ver 1.1 Charles P. Coleman October 31, 2005 1 / 40 : Controllability Tests Observability Tests LEARNING OUTCOMES: Perform controllability tests Perform
More information