UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
|
|
- Harriet Hardy
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UNIVERSITY OF CAIFORNIA, BERKEEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Elad Alon Homework #7 - Solutions EECS141 Due Thursday, October 22, 5pm, box in 240 Cory PROBEM 1: Complex CMOS Gates For this problem you should use the following parameters for the transistors. NMOS: =100nm, VTn = 0.25V, µn = 350 cm 2 /(V s), Cox = 0.95 µf/cm 2, vsat = 1e7 cm/s, λ = 0 PMOS: =100nm, VTp = 0.25V, µp = 175 cm 2 /(V s), Cox = 0.65 µf/cm 2, vsat = 1e7 cm/s, λ = 0 a) Implement the function F = A ( B + C ) + D E. Assuming long-channel transistors, size the devices so that the worst-case drive resistance is the same as an inverter with W N / =2 and W P / =4. b) Imagine that input "B" to the gate was always the last one to arrive, making the delay of the gate from B rising or falling to the output falling or rising critical. Please rearrange the implementation of your gate so that the delay of the gate from B transitioning is minimized.
2 In order to minimize the delay from input B to Out, the least amount of parasitic caps should be charged/discharged. This happens when the transistors connected to input B are the closest to the output (i.e., at the top of the stack). The revised gate is shown below: c) Draw a stick diagram of the gate you designed for part b) - you should minimize the diffusion breaks and use a single piece of poly for each input. In order to implement the gate without any diffusion breaks, we need to find a Consistent Euler path for both the pull-up and the pull-down network. Based on the logic graph shown below, one such path is D E A B C (note that there are other consistent Euler paths as well any correct solution will receive full credit).
3 d) Now resize the gate to match the worst-case pull-up and pull-down resistances using the velocity saturated model. What is the E from the B input? Since we re interested in logical effort, the first thing we need to do is figure out to size the reference inverter i.e., what ratio between NMOS and PMOS widths provides equal pull-down and pull-up currents. Setting the two currents equal to each other: I D,1xN = W N C ox,n v sat (V gs V th ) 2 (V gs V th ) +ε c,n = W P C ox,p v sat (V gs V th ) 2 (V gs V th ) +ε c,p = I D,1xP we get that W P /W N 2, meaning that we can continue using the reference inverter from part a) for this part of the problem as well. Now, in order to size the gate itself we need to equate the current through a stack of three NMOS transistors to that of the single NMOS device inside of the reference inverter. In order to do this we need to realize that a stack of N transistors is equivalent to a single transistor with N times the length, as shown in the example below: Therefore, for the pull-down side we get: (V gs V th ) 2 2 I D,1xN = 0.2µm C ox,n v sat (V gs V th ) +ε c,n = W (V gs V th ) NC ox,n v sat (V gs V th ) +ε c,n 3 = I D,3xN, where ε c,n = 2v sat µ n = 0.57V and hence W N = 0.35µm. Repeating the same process for the pull-up stack: (V gs V th ) 2 I D,1xP = 0.4µm C ox,p v sat (V gs V th ) +ε c,p = W P C ox,p v (V gs V th ) 2 sat (V gs V th ) +ε c,p 2 = I D,2xP
4 where ε c,p = 2v sat µ p = 1.14V and hence W P = 0.63µm. The circuit with the new sizing is shown in the figure below (note that the sizes are shown in units of W/, not absolute microns): The E of the gate from the B input is therefore: E = ( )C g (2 + 4)C g = e) Use SPICE to extract the E from the B input for the gate with the sizing from part d). How does this compare with the result predicted from part d)? To measure E B of this complex gate we should use the method from HW#4 i.e. we build a chain of these gates where the output of the previous gate is connected to the B input of the next gate. We also have to ensure that the other inputs do not influence the output. In order to do this, when B is low there must be exactly one pull-down branch (the one that contains the NMOS controlled by B) that connects the output to ground. Analogous to this, when B is high there must be exactly one pull-up branch that contains the B input and connects the output to the power supply. Examining the schematic of the gate, we can see that other inputs need to have values: A=0, D=0, E=1, C=1 (note that this is not a unique combination). Now we have that when B=0, branch BCE is on (note that this is the worst pull-down case) and when B=1, branch BA is on which represent the worst pull-up case. Simulating in HSPICE, we get that E=1.87, which is relatively close to what we predicted by hand calculation.
5 HSPICE deck for finding E: *** HW7 Problem 1e ***.IB '/home/ff/ee141/modes/gpdk090_mos.sp' TT_s1v.PARAM vddval=1.2.param fanout=1.param length=100n.param wn=0.35u.param wp=0.63u * Inverter SUBCKT Definition.SUBCKT inv vdd gnd in out Mp out in vdd vdd gpdk090_pmos1v W=0.4u ='length' Mn out in gnd gnd gpdk090_nmos1v W=0.2u ='length'.ends.subckt cplx_gate vdd gnd ina inb inc ind ine out MpA inta ina vdd vdd gpdk090_pmos1v W='wP' ='length' MpB out inb inta vdd gpdk090_pmos1v W=wP =length MpC out inc inta vdd gpdk090_pmos1v W=wP =length MpE inte ine vdd vdd gpdk090_pmos1v W=wP =length MpD out ind inte vdd gpdk090_pmos1v W=wP =length MnD intd ind gnd gnd gpdk090_nmos1v W=wN =length MnE intd ine gnd gnd gpdk090_nmos1v W=wN =length MnC intc inc intd gnd gpdk090_nmos1v W=wN =length MnA out ina intd gnd gpdk090_nmos1v W=wN =length MnB out inb intc gnd gpdk090_nmos1v W=wN =length.ends * Voltage Sources V1 vdd 0 'vddval' V2 vinb 0 PW 0 0V 10p 0V 11p 'vddval' 1011p 'vddval' 1012p 0V.connect vina 0.connect vinc vdd.connect vind 0.connect vine vdd * Gate chain Xgate2_1 vdd 0 vina vinb vinc vind vine out1 cplx_gate M=1 Xgate2_2 vdd 0 vina out1 vinc vind vine out2 cplx_gate M=fanout Xgate2_3 vdd 0 vina out2 vinc vind vine out3 cplx_gate M='fanout*fanout'
6 Xgate2_4 vdd 0 vina out3 vinc vind vine out4 cplx_gate M='fanout*fanout*fanout' * INV chain Xinv_1 vdd 0 vinb out12 inv M=1 Xinv_2 vdd 0 out12 out22 inv M=fanout Xinv_3 vdd 0 out22 out32 inv M='fanout*fanout' Xinv_4 vdd 0 out32 out42 inv M='fanout*fanout*fanout' * options.option post=2 nomod.op * analysis.tran 0.1PS 1.5NS sweep fanout *gate chain.measure TRAN tph TRIG V(out1) VA='vddval/2' RISE=1 TARG V(out2) VA='vddval/2' FA=1.MEASURE TRAN tph TRIG V(out1) VA='vddval/2' FA=1 TARG V(out2) VA='vddval/2' RISE=1.MEASURE TRAN tpavg PARAM='(tpH+tpH)/2' *inverter chain.measure TRAN tph2 TRIG V(out12) VA='vddval/2' RISE=1 TARG V(out22) VA='vddval/2' FA=1.MEASURE TRAN tph2 TRIG V(out12) VA='vddval/2' FA=1 TARG V(out22) VA='vddval/2' RISE=1.MEASURE TRAN tpavg2 PARAM='(tpH2+tpH2)/2'.END PROBEM 2: B Wire for 256x256 SRAM In this problem we will be looking at a bitline (B) wire for a 256x256 SRAM array. You should assume that the B wire is implemented in M2 (which has a minimum width of 0.14µm, R w = Ω/ ) and is running over active. You can also assume that there are no higher metal layers running above it. Right next to this B, at the minimum allowed distance there is another identical B (from another cell), as shown on the next page. To calculate the capacitance of this wire, you should use tables 4-2 and 4-3 from the book. You should assume that the cell height is 1µm, that the access device is 120nm wide (which is the minimum width in this technology), and that C D = 1.6fF/µm. a) What is the total capacitance of the B due to the B wires only (i.e. not including the C D of the access devices)?
7 From the tables in the book we get the following values for the parameters of the M2 wire: C pp = 15 af / µm 2, C fringe = 27 af / µm, C c = 85 af / µ m. Including the interwire capacitance, we get: C C W C C af µ m µ m µ m af µ m µ m af µ m µ m 2 w = pp + 2 fringe + c = 15 / / / 256 = 36.1 ff. b) What is the total resistance (from the top of the SRAM to the bottom) of the B wire? The resistance of the wire is: R w = R sq W = 0.075Ω /sq 256µm 0.14µm = 137Ω. c) Now including the capacitance of the access devices, what is the total RC delay of the B wire? The access transistors are going to add their drain capacitance to the existing wire capacitance. Thus, the total B capacitance is: C B = C w C D W acc = 36.1 ff ff = 85.3 ff The wire delay is therefore (assuming slope input): t w = R wc B 2 = 5.84 ps d) How much energy is pulled out of the power supply to charge/discharge the bitlines every time the 256x256 SRAM is read? Each time the SRAM is read, in each column of cells either B or BB (depending on whether the stored value is a one or a zero) gets discharged to ground and then precharged back to Vdd. This leads to the conclusion that the total switching capacitance is: C sw = 256 C B. The energy that is pulled out of the power supply by each read operation is therefore: E = C sw V dd 2 = 256 C B V dd 2 = 31.4 pj. PROBEM 3: Wire Delay
8 In this problem you will calculate the delay of a chain of gates driving a long wire, as shown below. Gate sizes are annotated on the schematic, as are the dimensions of the wire. For the wire parameters you should use: R = Ω/, W = 0.14 µm, C pp = 6.5 af/µm 2, and C fringe = 14 af/µm. For the logic gates you should assume that V dd = 1.2V, C g = 2 ff/um, C d = 1.6 ff/um, R nmos = 10 kω/, and R pmos = 20 kω/. Finally, the maximum input capacitance C in = 8fF. Note that you should use a minimum channel length of 100nm for the transistors. a) Draw the RC model for calculating the delay of the circuit shown above. The model shown below is for In switching from low to high, but the overall delay will be the same in the other case as well since the gates are sized for equal pull-up and pulldown resistances. The wire has been modeled with a single π section. This model also assumes that the critical input drives the NMOS transistor at the top of the stack. b) Calculate the delay using the model from part a). Given that C in = 2C g W N,in = 8 ff (remember that all devices in NAND2 gate have the same width), we get W N, in = 2 µ m and hence: R N,in = 2R N,sq W N,in = 1kΩ, C par,in = γ NAND2 C in = 3 2 γc in = 9.6 ff. Similarly, for the other two gates:
9 C 3C 3C W 24 ff = = =, so W N,1 = 4 µ m and W P,1 = 8 µ m. Therefore: 1 in g N,1 R P,1 = R P,sq W P,1 = 0.25kΩ, C par,1 = γc 1 = 0.8C 1 = 19.2 ff. C = 40C = 3C W = 320 ff, so W N,2 = µ m and: 2 in g N,2 R = R = 18.75Ω, W N,2 N, sq N,2 C par,2 = γc 2 = 0.8C 2 = 256 ff. The wire parameters are calculated as follows: R w = R sq,w w W w = 535.7Ω C w = C pp W w w + 2C fringe w = 28.9 ff. The total delay is just the sum of the delays of the three parts of the chain: t d = t d,1 + t d,2 + t d,3, where each of these delays can be calculated using Elmore time constants (assuming ramp inputs): t d,1 = R N,in (C par,in + C 1 ) = 33.6 ps t d,2 = R P,1 (C par,1 + C w /2)+ (R P,1 + R w )(C w /2+ C 2 ) = ps t d,3 = R N,2 (C par,2 + C ) = 19.9 ps. Hence, the total delay is: t d = t d,1 + t d,2 + t d,3 = ps. c) Without changing the length of the wire, how would you modify the circuit in order to reduce its delay? Draw your improved design and estimate the new delay. (Note that you are allowed to change anything about the circuit except for the length of the wire, C in, and C.)
10 In order to improve the delay of the circuit, the first thing we should do is figure out which part of the circuit dominates the delay. From part b) it should be obvious that the delay is dominated by td,2, more specifically by the term: t dom = ( R P,1 + R w ) C 2 = ps. The best way to reduce the impact of this term is to reduce the values of each of the constintuent components even if that increases the delay coming from the other components. As both resistances are comparable in magnitude, we should probably increase the size of the inverter that drives the wire (in order to decrease its resistance, R P,1 ) and increase the width of the wire (in order to decrease its resistance, R w ). In order to reduce the capacitance that these resistors drive ( C2 ), we should also decrease the size of the last inverter in chain. There are obviously many possible choices for changing the above parameters, and any conceptually correct approach that explains how the choices were made to reduce the delay will receive full credit. As an example, let s assume that one choseto increase the size of gate 1 by a factor 2 while increasing the width of the wire by a factor of 10 (the influence of the wire s width on its capacitance is not that big since the parallel plate portion of the capacitance is much much smaller than the fringe portion). et s also assume that we decrease the size of the last stage by a factor 3. The new sizing is presented on figure below: The new parameters are: C 1 = 2C 1 = 48 ff; W P,1 = 2W P,1 = 16 µ m ; R P,1 = R P,sq = 125Ω; C par,1 = γ C 1 = 38.4 ff W P,1 C 2 = 1 3 C 2 = ff; W N,2 = 1 3 W N,2 =17.8µm; R N,2 = R N,sq = 56.4Ω; C par,2 = γc 2 = 85.3 ff W N,2 W w = 10 W w = 1.4µ m ; R w = R w sq,w = 53.6Ω ; C w = C pp W w w + 2C fringe w = 37 ff. W w And the new delay is: t d,1 = R N,in (C par,in + C 1 ) = 57.6 ps t d,2 = R P,1 ( C par,1 + C w /2)+ ( R P,1 + R w )( C w /2+ C 2 ) = 29.5ps
11 t d,3 = R N,2 ( C par,2 + C ) = 50 ps t d = t d,1 + t d,2 + t d,3 = 137.1ps Note that the optimal way to size the circuit would be to take partial derivative of the total delay for each of the sizing parameters ( W P,1,W w,w N,2 ) and set them all equal to zero. This could be done by hand or using MATAB, resulting in an optimal sizing that makes gate 1 s size 4.5C in, gate 2 s size 20*C in, and the wire 3.44µm wide. The optimal delay is then: t d,min = 124.3ps
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Elad Alon Homework #7 Solutions EECS141 PROBLEM 1: Logical Effort with Velocity Saturated
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Elad Alon Homework #2 - Solutions EECS141 Due Thursday, September 10, 5pm, box in 240
More informationElad Alon Homework #2 EECS141 Due Thursday, September 9, 5pm, box in 240 Cory
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Elad Alon Homework #2 EECS141 Due Thursday, September 9, 5pm, box in 240 Cory PROBLEM
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF LIFORNI, ERKELEY ollege of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and omputer Sciences Elad lon Homework #3 EE141 Due Thursday, September 13 th, 5pm, box outside 125 ory PROLEM
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF CLIFORNI, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Elad lon Homework #6 EECS141 Due Thursday, Oct. 15 @ 40 Cory Unless otherwise noted, you
More informationLecture 12 CMOS Delay & Transient Response
EE 471: Transport Phenomena in Solid State Devices Spring 2018 Lecture 12 CMOS Delay & Transient Response Bryan Ackland Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Stevens Institute of Technology
More informationEE115C Digital Electronic Circuits Homework #5
EE115C Digital Electronic Circuits Homework #5 Due Thursday, May 13, 6pm @ 56-147E EIV Problem 1 Elmore Delay Analysis Calculate the Elmore delay from node A to node B using the values for the resistors
More informationLecture 5: DC & Transient Response
Lecture 5: DC & Transient Response Outline q Pass Transistors q DC Response q Logic Levels and Noise Margins q Transient Response q RC Delay Models q Delay Estimation 2 Activity 1) If the width of a transistor
More informationand V DS V GS V T (the saturation region) I DS = k 2 (V GS V T )2 (1+ V DS )
ECE 4420 Spring 2005 Page 1 FINAL EXAMINATION NAME SCORE /100 Problem 1O 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sum Points INSTRUCTIONS: This exam is closed book. You are permitted four sheets of notes (three of which are your sheets
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Elad Alon Homework #2 EECS141 Due Thursday, September 9, 5pm, box in 240 Cory PROBLEM
More informationLecture 5: DC & Transient Response
Lecture 5: DC & Transient Response Outline Pass Transistors DC Response Logic Levels and Noise Margins Transient Response RC Delay Models Delay Estimation 2 Pass Transistors We have assumed source is grounded
More informationEE5780 Advanced VLSI CAD
EE5780 Advanced VLSI CAD Lecture 4 DC and Transient Responses, Circuit Delays Zhuo Feng 4.1 Outline Pass Transistors DC Response Logic Levels and Noise Margins Transient Response RC Delay Models Delay
More informationENEE 359a Digital VLSI Design
SLIDE 1 ENEE 359a Digital VLSI Design & Logical Effort Prof. blj@ece.umd.edu Credit where credit is due: Slides contain original artwork ( Jacob 2004) as well as material taken liberally from Irwin & Vijay
More informationEE115C Digital Electronic Circuits Homework #6
Problem 1 Sizing of adder blocks Electrical Engineering Department Spring 2010 EE115C Digital Electronic Circuits Homework #6 Solution Figure 1: Mirror adder. Study the mirror adder cell (textbook, pages
More informationCARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING DIGITAL INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FALL 2002
CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING 18-322 DIGITAL INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FALL 2002 Final Examination, Monday Dec. 16, 2002 NAME: SECTION: Time: 180 minutes Closed
More informationEE 466/586 VLSI Design. Partha Pande School of EECS Washington State University
EE 466/586 VLSI Design Partha Pande School of EECS Washington State University pande@eecs.wsu.edu Lecture 9 Propagation delay Power and delay Tradeoffs Follow board notes Propagation Delay Switching Time
More informationLecture 6: DC & Transient Response
Lecture 6: DC & Transient Response Slides courtesy of Deming Chen Slides based on the initial set from David Harris CMOS VLSI Design Outline Pass Transistors DC Response Logic Levels and Noise Margins
More informationInterconnect (2) Buffering Techniques. Logical Effort
Interconnect (2) Buffering Techniques. Logical Effort Lecture 14 18-322 Fall 2002 Textbook: [Sections 4.2.1, 8.2.3] A few announcements! M1 is almost over: The check-off is due today (by 9:30PM) Students
More informationLecture 4: DC & Transient Response
Introduction to CMOS VLSI Design Lecture 4: DC & Transient Response David Harris Harvey Mudd College Spring 004 Outline DC Response Logic Levels and Noise Margins Transient Response Delay Estimation Slide
More informationDC and Transient. Courtesy of Dr. Daehyun Dr. Dr. Shmuel and Dr.
DC and Transient Courtesy of Dr. Daehyun Lim@WSU, Dr. Harris@HMC, Dr. Shmuel Wimer@BIU and Dr. Choi@PSU http://csce.uark.edu +1 (479) 575-604 yrpeng@uark.edu Pass Transistors We have assumed source is
More informationLecture Outline. ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals. Review: 1st Order RC Delay Models. Review: Two-Input NOR Gate (NOR2)
ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals Lec 14: March 1, 2016 Combination Logic: Ratioed and Pass Logic Lecture Outline! CMOS Gates Review " CMOS Worst Case Analysis! Ratioed Logic Gates!
More informationCMOS logic gates. João Canas Ferreira. March University of Porto Faculty of Engineering
CMOS logic gates João Canas Ferreira University of Porto Faculty of Engineering March 2016 Topics 1 General structure 2 General properties 3 Cell layout João Canas Ferreira (FEUP) CMOS logic gates March
More informationEECS 151/251A Homework 5
EECS 151/251A Homework 5 Due Monday, March 5 th, 2018 Problem 1: Timing The data-path shown below is used in a simple processor. clk rd1 rd2 0 wr regfile 1 0 ALU REG 1 The elements used in the design have
More informationEECS 141: FALL 05 MIDTERM 1
University of California College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences D. Markovic TuTh 11-1:3 Thursday, October 6, 6:3-8:pm EECS 141: FALL 5 MIDTERM 1 NAME Last SOLUTION
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engeerg Department of Electrical Engeerg and Computer Sciences Elad Alon Homework # Solutions EECS141 PROBLEM 1: VTC In this problem we will analyze the noise
More informationSpiral 2 7. Capacitance, Delay and Sizing. Mark Redekopp
2-7.1 Spiral 2 7 Capacitance, Delay and Sizing Mark Redekopp 2-7.2 Learning Outcomes I understand the sources of capacitance in CMOS circuits I understand how delay scales with resistance, capacitance
More informationCPE/EE 427, CPE 527 VLSI Design I Delay Estimation. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama in Huntsville
CPE/EE 47, CPE 57 VLSI Design I Delay Estimation Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of labama in Huntsville leksandar Milenkovic ( www.ece.uah.edu/~milenka ) Review: CMOS Circuit
More informationEE 434 Lecture 33. Logic Design
EE 434 Lecture 33 Logic Design Review from last time: Ask the inverter how it will interpret logic levels V IN V OUT V H =? V L =? V LARGE V H V L V H Review from last time: The two-inverter loop X Y X
More informationEEC 116 Lecture #5: CMOS Logic. Rajeevan Amirtharajah Bevan Baas University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation
EEC 116 Lecture #5: CMOS Logic Rajeevan mirtharajah Bevan Baas University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation nnouncements Quiz 1 today! Lab 2 reports due this week Lab 3 this week HW
More informationVLSI GATE LEVEL DESIGN UNIT - III P.VIDYA SAGAR ( ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR) Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, VBIT
VLSI UNIT - III GATE LEVEL DESIGN P.VIDYA SAGAR ( ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR) contents GATE LEVEL DESIGN : Logic Gates and Other complex gates, Switch logic, Alternate gate circuits, Time Delays, Driving large
More informationEEC 118 Lecture #6: CMOS Logic. Rajeevan Amirtharajah University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation
EEC 118 Lecture #6: CMOS Logic Rajeevan mirtharajah University of California, Davis Jeff Parkhurst Intel Corporation nnouncements Quiz 1 today! Lab 2 reports due this week Lab 3 this week HW 3 due this
More informationLecture 7 Circuit Delay, Area and Power
Lecture 7 Circuit Delay, Area and Power lecture notes from S. Mitra Intro VLSI System course (EE271) Introduction to VLSI Systems 1 Circuits and Delay Introduction to VLSI Systems 2 Power, Delay and Area:
More informationESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals
ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals Lec 15: March 3, 2016 Combination Logic: Ratioed & Pass Logic, and Performance Lecture Outline! CMOS NOR2 Worst Case Analysis! Pass Transistor
More informationDigital Integrated Circuits
Chapter 6 The CMOS Inverter 1 Contents Introduction (MOST models) 0, 1 st, 2 nd order The CMOS inverter : The static behavior: o DC transfer characteristics, o Short-circuit current The CMOS inverter :
More informationHomework Assignment #3 EE 477 Spring 2017 Professor Parker , -.. = 1.8 -, 345 = 0 -
Homework Assignment #3 EE 477 Spring 2017 Professor Parker Note:! " = $ " % &' ( ) * ),! + = $ + % &' (, *,, -.. = 1.8 -, 345 = 0 - Question 1: a) (8%) Define the terms V OHmin, V IHmin, V ILmax and V
More informationEECS 312: Digital Integrated Circuits Final Exam Solutions 23 April 2009
Signature: EECS 312: Digital Integrated Circuits Final Exam Solutions 23 April 2009 Robert Dick Show your work. Derivations are required for credit; end results are insufficient. Closed book. You may use
More informationInterconnects. Wire Resistance Wire Capacitance Wire RC Delay Crosstalk Wire Engineering Repeaters. ECE 261 James Morizio 1
Interconnects Wire Resistance Wire Capacitance Wire RC Delay Crosstalk Wire Engineering Repeaters ECE 261 James Morizio 1 Introduction Chips are mostly made of wires called interconnect In stick diagram,
More informationIntegrated Circuits & Systems
Federal University of Santa Catarina Center for Technology Computer Science & Electronics Engineering Integrated Circuits & Systems INE 5442 Lecture 14 The CMOS Inverter: dynamic behavior (sizing, inverter
More informationName: Answers. Mean: 83, Standard Deviation: 12 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Total. ESE370 Fall 2015
University of Pennsylvania Department of Electrical and System Engineering Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems ESE370, Fall 2015 Final Tuesday, December 15 Problem weightings
More informationVery Large Scale Integration (VLSI)
Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Lecture 4 Dr. Ahmed H. Madian Ah_madian@hotmail.com Dr. Ahmed H. Madian-VLSI Contents Delay estimation Simple RC model Penfield-Rubenstein Model Logical effort Delay
More informationECE 438: Digital Integrated Circuits Assignment #4 Solution The Inverter
ECE 438: Digital Integrated Circuits Assignment #4 The Inverter Text: Chapter 5, Digital Integrated Circuits 2 nd Ed, Rabaey 1) Consider the CMOS inverter circuit in Figure P1 with the following parameters.
More informationVLSI Circuit Design (EEC0056) Exam
Mestrado Integrado em Engenharia Eletrotécnica e de omputadores VLSI ircuit esign (EE0056) Exam 205/6 4 th year, 2 nd sem. uration: 2:30 Open notes Note: The test has 5 questions for 200 points. Show all
More informationHomework Assignment #5 EE 477 Spring 2017 Professor Parker
Homework Assignment #5 EE 477 Spring 2017 Professor Parker Question 1: (15%) Compute the worst-case rising and falling RC time constants at point B of the circuit below using the Elmore delay method. Assume
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences. Professor Oldham Fall 1999
UNIVERSITY OF CLIFORNI College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Professor Oldham Fall 1999 EECS 40 FINL EXM 13 December 1999 Name: Last, First Student ID: T: Kusuma
More informationDigital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective
igital Integrated Circuits esign Perspective esigning Combinational Logic Circuits 1 Combinational vs. Sequential Logic In Combinational Logic Circuit Out In Combinational Logic Circuit Out State Combinational
More informationC.K. Ken Yang UCLA Courtesy of MAH EE 215B
Decoders: Logical Effort Applied C.K. Ken Yang UCLA yang@ee.ucla.edu Courtesy of MAH 1 Overview Reading Rabaey 6.2.2 (Ratio-ed logic) W&H 6.2.2 Overview We have now gone through the basics of decoders,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
UNIERSITY OF CAIFORNIA College of Engineering Deartment of Electrical Engineering and Comuter Sciences Fall 006 Borivoje Nikolic Homework #4 Solution EECS 4 Problem A This is a PMOS device. Negative gate-source,
More informationEE141-Fall 2011 Digital Integrated Circuits
EE4-Fall 20 Digital Integrated Circuits Lecture 5 Memory decoders Administrative Stuff Homework #6 due today Project posted Phase due next Friday Project done in pairs 2 Last Lecture Last lecture Logical
More informationMidterm. ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals. Lecture Outline. Pass Transistor Logic. Restore Output.
ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals Lec 16: March 21, 2017 Transmission Gates, Euler Paths, Energy Basics Review Midterm! Midterm " Mean: 79.5 " Standard Dev: 14.5 2 Lecture Outline!
More information9/18/2008 GMU, ECE 680 Physical VLSI Design
ECE680: Physical VLSI Design Chapter III CMOS Device, Inverter, Combinational circuit Logic and Layout Part 3 Combinational Logic Gates (textbook chapter 6) 9/18/2008 GMU, ECE 680 Physical VLSI Design
More informationCMOS Inverter (static view)
Review: Design Abstraction Levels SYSTEM CMOS Inverter (static view) + MODULE GATE [Adapted from Chapter 5. 5.3 CIRCUIT of G DEVICE Rabaey s Digital Integrated Circuits,, J. Rabaey et al.] S D Review:
More informationESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals
ESE 570: Digital Integrated Circuits and VLSI Fundamentals Lec 15: March 15, 2018 Euler Paths, Energy Basics and Optimization Midterm! Midterm " Mean: 89.7 " Standard Dev: 8.12 2 Lecture Outline! Euler
More informationThe Physical Structure (NMOS)
The Physical Structure (NMOS) Al SiO2 Field Oxide Gate oxide S n+ Polysilicon Gate Al SiO2 SiO2 D n+ L channel P Substrate Field Oxide contact Metal (S) n+ (G) L W n+ (D) Poly 1 Transistor Resistance Two
More informationhave followed. Submit the necessary plots showing the trade-off between propagation delays and transistor widths.
H o m e w o r k 3 S o l u t i o n E C E 5 5 9 : M O S V L S I D e s i g n ( F a l l 0 0 9 ) E C E D e p a r t m e n t, P u r d u e U n i v e r s i t y Assigned: 06-Oct-009 Due: 15-Oct-009 I m p o r t a
More informationVLSI Design and Simulation
VLSI Design and Simulation Performance Characterization Topics Performance Characterization Resistance Estimation Capacitance Estimation Inductance Estimation Performance Characterization Inverter Voltage
More informationName: Answers. Grade: Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Total. ESE370 Fall 2015
University of Pennsylvania Department of Electrical and System Engineering Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems ESE370, Fall 2015 Midterm 1 Monday, September 28 5 problems
More informationCOMP 103. Lecture 10. Inverter Dynamics: The Quest for Performance. Section 5.4.2, What is this lecture+ about? PERFORMANCE
COMP 103 Lecture 10 Inverter Dynamics: The Quest for Performance Section 5.4.2, 5.4.3 [All lecture notes are adapted from Mary Jane Irwin, Penn State, which were adapted from Rabaey s Digital Integrated
More informationLecture 9: Interconnect
Digital Integrated Circuits (83-313) Lecture 9: Interconnect Semester B, 2016-17 Lecturer: Dr. Adam Teman TAs: Itamar Levi, Robert Giterman 23 May 2017 Disclaimer: This course was prepared, in its entirety,
More informationEE115C Digital Electronic Circuits Homework #4
EE115 Digital Electronic ircuits Homework #4 Problem 1 Power Dissipation Solution Vdd =1.0V onsider the source follower circuit used to drive a load L =20fF shown above. M1 and M2 are both NMOS transistors
More informationInterconnect (2) Buffering Techniques.Transmission Lines. Lecture Fall 2003
Interconnect (2) Buffering Techniques.Transmission Lines Lecture 12 18-322 Fall 2003 A few announcements Partners Lab Due Times Midterm 1 is nearly here Date: 10/14/02, time: 3:00-4:20PM, place: in class
More informationName: Grade: Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Total. ESE370 Fall 2015
University of Pennsylvania Department of Electrical and System Engineering Circuit-Level Modeling, Design, and Optimization for Digital Systems ESE370, Fall 205 Midterm Wednesday, November 4 Point values
More informationLecture 4: CMOS Transistor Theory
Introduction to CMOS VLSI Design Lecture 4: CMOS Transistor Theory David Harris, Harvey Mudd College Kartik Mohanram and Steven Levitan University of Pittsburgh Outline q Introduction q MOS Capacitor q
More informationThe CMOS Inverter: A First Glance
The CMOS Inverter: A First Glance V DD S D V in V out C L D S CMOS Inverter N Well V DD V DD PMOS 2λ PMOS Contacts In Out In Out Metal 1 NMOS Polysilicon NMOS GND CMOS Inverter: Steady State Response V
More informationIntegrated Circuits & Systems
Federal University of Santa Catarina Center for Technology Computer Science & Electronics Engineering Integrated Circuits & Systems INE 5442 Lecture 16 CMOS Combinational Circuits - 2 guntzel@inf.ufsc.br
More informationDynamic operation 20
Dynamic operation 20 A simple model for the propagation delay Symmetric inverter (rise and fall delays are identical) otal capacitance is linear t p Minimum length devices R W C L t = 0.69R C = p W L 0.69
More informationEEE 421 VLSI Circuits
EEE 421 CMOS Properties Full rail-to-rail swing high noise margins» Logic levels not dependent upon the relative device sizes transistors can be minimum size ratioless Always a path to V dd or GND in steady
More informationEE141Microelettronica. CMOS Logic
Microelettronica CMOS Logic CMOS logic Power consumption in CMOS logic gates Where Does Power Go in CMOS? Dynamic Power Consumption Charging and Discharging Capacitors Short Circuit Currents Short Circuit
More informationDigital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective
Digital Integrated Circuits Design Perspective Jan M. Rabaey nantha Chandrakasan orivoje Nikolić Designing Combinational Logic Circuits November 2002. 1 Combinational vs. Sequential Logic In Combinational
More informationProperties of CMOS Gates Snapshot
MOS logic 1 Properties of MOS Gates Snapshot High noise margins: V OH and V OL are at V DD and GND, respectively. No static power consumption: There never exists a direct path between V DD and V SS (GND)
More information5. CMOS Gate Characteristics CS755
5. CMOS Gate Characteristics Last module: CMOS Transistor theory This module: DC Response Logic Levels and Noise Margins Transient Response Delay Estimation Transistor ehavior 1) If the width of a transistor
More informationEE371 - Advanced VLSI Circuit Design
EE371 - Advanced VLSI Circuit Design Midterm Examination May 1999 Name: No. Points Score 1. 20 2. 24 3. 26 4. 20 TOTAL / 90 In recognition of and in the spirit of the Stanford University Honor Code, I
More informationInterconnects. Introduction
Interconnects Wire Resistance Wire Capacitance Wire RC Delay Crosstalk Wire Engineering Repeaters ECE 261 Krish Chakrabarty 1 Introduction Chips are mostly made of ires called interconnect In stick diagram,
More informationIntegrated Circuits & Systems
Federal University of Santa Catarina Center for Technology Computer Science & Electronics Engineering Integrated Circuits & Systems INE 5442 Lecture 13 The CMOS Inverter: dynamic behavior (delay) guntzel@inf.ufsc.br
More informationTHE INVERTER. Inverter
THE INVERTER DIGITAL GATES Fundamental Parameters Functionality Reliability, Robustness Area Performance» Speed (delay)» Power Consumption» Energy Noise in Digital Integrated Circuits v(t) V DD i(t) (a)
More informationIntegrated Circuits & Systems
Federal University of Santa Catarina Center for Technology Computer Science & Electronics Engineering Integrated Circuits & Systems INE 5442 Lecture 7 Interconnections 1: wire resistance, capacitance,
More informationEECS 141: SPRING 09 MIDTERM 2
University of California College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences J. Rabaey WeFr 2-3:30pm We, April 22, 2:00-3:30pm EECS 141: SPRING 09 MIDTERM 2 NAME Last First
More informationMOS Transistor Theory
MOS Transistor Theory So far, we have viewed a MOS transistor as an ideal switch (digital operation) Reality: less than ideal EE 261 Krish Chakrabarty 1 Introduction So far, we have treated transistors
More informationECE321 Electronics I
ECE31 Electronics Lecture 1: CMOS nverter: Noise Margin & Delay Model Payman Zarkesh-Ha Office: ECE Bldg. 30B Office hours: Tuesday :00-3:00PM or by appointment E-mail: payman@ece.unm.edu Slide: 1 CMOS
More informationEE213, Spr 2017 HW#3 Due: May 17 th, in class. Figure 1
RULES: Please try to work on your own. Discussion is permissible, but identical submissions are unacceptable! Please show all intermediate steps: a correct solution without an explanation will get zero
More informationECE 342 Solid State Devices & Circuits 4. CMOS
ECE 34 Solid State Devices & Circuits 4. CMOS Jose E. Schutt-Aine Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Illinois jschutt@emlab.uiuc.edu ECE 34 Jose Schutt Aine 1 Digital Circuits V IH : Input
More informationEECS 105: FALL 06 FINAL
University of California College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Jan M. Rabaey TuTh 2-3:30 Wednesday December 13, 12:30-3:30pm EECS 105: FALL 06 FINAL NAME Last
More informationDigital Integrated Circuits 2nd Inverter
Digital Integrated Circuits The Inverter The CMOS Inverter V DD Analysis Inverter complex gate Cost V in V out complexity & Area Integrity and robustness C L Static behavior Performance Dynamic response
More informationDigital Integrated Circuits (83-313) Lecture 5: Interconnect. Semester B, Lecturer: Adam Teman TAs: Itamar Levi, Robert Giterman 1
Digital Integrated Circuits (83-313) Lecture 5: Interconnect Semester B, 2015-16 Lecturer: Adam Teman TAs: Itamar Levi, Robert Giterman 1 What will we learn today? 1 A First Glance at Interconnect 2 3
More informationCHAPTER 15 CMOS DIGITAL LOGIC CIRCUITS
CHAPTER 5 CMOS DIGITAL LOGIC CIRCUITS Chapter Outline 5. CMOS Logic Gate Circuits 5. Digital Logic Inverters 5.3 The CMOS Inverter 5.4 Dynamic Operation of the CMOS Inverter 5.5 Transistor Sizing 5.6 Power
More informationECE251 VLSI System Design Spring Homework 1. Jinfeng Liu
ECE251 VLSI System Design Spring 2000 Homework 1 Jinfeng Liu 65547013 05/27/2000 Problem 1: Procedure of solutions 1. Determine β n β n = An * C L / t df Ar = 1 2n (1 n) ln (2(1 n) V 0) 0) Vdd(1 n) V [
More informationHomework #2 10/6/2016. C int = C g, where 1 t p = t p0 (1 + C ext / C g ) = t p0 (1 + f/ ) f = C ext /C g is the effective fanout
0/6/06 Homework # Lecture 8, 9: Sizing and Layout of omplex MOS Gates Reading: hapter 4, sections 4.3-4.5 October 3 & 5, 06 hapter, section.5.5 Prof. R. Iris ahar Weste & Harris vailable on course webpage
More informationLecture 210 Physical Aspects of ICs (12/15/01) Page 210-1
Lecture 210 Physical Aspects of ICs (12/15/01) Page 210-1 LECTURE 210 PHYSICAL ASPECTS OF ICs (READING: Text-Sec. 2.5, 2.6, 2.8) INTRODUCTION Objective Illustrate the physical aspects of integrated circuits
More informationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY College of Engineering Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences Elad Alon Homework #9 EECS141 PROBLEM 1: TIMING Consider the simple state machine shown
More informationLecture 7: SPICE Simulation
Introduction to CMOS VLSI Design Lecture 7: SPICE Simulation David Harris Harvey Mudd College Spring 2004 Outline Introduction to SPICE DC Analysis Transient Analysis Subcircuits Optimization Power Measurement
More informationVLSI Design, Fall Logical Effort. Jacob Abraham
6. Logical Effort 6. Logical Effort Jacob Abraham Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin VLSI Design Fall 207 September 20, 207 ECE Department, University of
More informationFig. 1 CMOS Transistor Circuits (a) Inverter Out = NOT In, (b) NOR-gate C = NOT (A or B)
1 Introduction to Transistor-Level Logic Circuits 1 By Prawat Nagvajara At the transistor level of logic circuits, transistors operate as switches with the logic variables controlling the open or closed
More informationCapacitance - 1. The parallel plate capacitor. Capacitance: is a measure of the charge stored on each plate for a given voltage such that Q=CV
Capacitance - 1 The parallel plate capacitor Capacitance: is a measure of the charge stored on each plate for a given voltage such that Q=CV Charge separation in a parallel-plate capacitor causes an internal
More informationENGR890 Digital VLSI Design Fall Lecture 4: CMOS Inverter (static view)
ENGR89 Digital VLSI Design Fall 5 Lecture 4: CMOS Inverter (static view) [Adapted from Chapter 5 of Digital Integrated Circuits, 3, J. Rabaey et al.] [Also borrowed from Vijay Narayanan and Mary Jane Irwin]
More informationLecture 34: Portable Systems Technology Background Professor Randy H. Katz Computer Science 252 Fall 1995
Lecture 34: Portable Systems Technology Background Professor Randy H. Katz Computer Science 252 Fall 1995 RHK.F95 1 Technology Trends: Microprocessor Capacity 100000000 10000000 Pentium Transistors 1000000
More informationCMPEN 411 VLSI Digital Circuits. Lecture 04: CMOS Inverter (static view)
CMPEN 411 VLSI Digital Circuits Lecture 04: CMOS Inverter (static view) Kyusun Choi [Adapted from Rabaey s Digital Integrated Circuits, Second Edition, 2003 J. Rabaey, A. Chandrakasan, B. Nikolic] CMPEN
More informationDelay and Power Estimation
EEN454 Digital Integrated ircuit Design Delay and Power Estimation EEN 454 Delay Estimation We would like to be able to easily estimate delay Not as accurate as simulation But make it easier to ask What
More informationEE M216A.:. Fall Lecture 4. Speed Optimization. Prof. Dejan Marković Speed Optimization via Gate Sizing
EE M216A.:. Fall 2010 Lecture 4 Speed Optimization Prof. Dejan Marković ee216a@gmail.com Speed Optimization via Gate Sizing Gate sizing basics P:N ratio Complex gates Velocity saturation ti Tapering Developing
More informationThe Wire. Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective. Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic. July 30, 2002
Digital Integrated Circuits A Design Perspective Jan M. Rabaey Anantha Chandrakasan Borivoje Nikolic The Wire July 30, 2002 1 The Wire transmitters receivers schematics physical 2 Interconnect Impact on
More informationESE570 Spring University of Pennsylvania Department of Electrical and System Engineering Digital Integrated Cicruits AND VLSI Fundamentals
University of Pennsylvania Department of Electrical and System Engineering Digital Integrated Cicruits AND VLSI Fundamentals ESE570, Spring 2018 Final Monday, Apr 0 5 Problems with point weightings shown.
More informationHw 6 and 7 Graded and available Project Phase 2 Graded Project Phase 3 Launch Today
EECS141 1 Hw 8 Posted Last one to be graded Due Friday April 30 Hw 6 and 7 Graded and available Project Phase 2 Graded Project Phase 3 Launch Today EECS141 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Frequency
More information