Consumption-led Growth
|
|
- Baldwin Powell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 / 31 Consumption-led Growth Markus Brunnermeier markus@princeton.edu Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas pog@berkeley.edu Oleg Itskhoki itskhoki@princeton.edu University of Helsinki Helsinki, November 2018
2 Introduction
3 Motivation I Gourinchas and Jeanne GOURINCHAS (2013): the & JEANNE capital allocation THE ALLOCATION puzzle PUZZLE 1485 Capital Inflows (percent of GDP) RWA TGO MOZ COG TZA MLI SEN MWI NER MDG CIV HND BOL CRI BEN LKA PER JAM NPL CHL CYP CMR GHA ECU GTM TUN DOM JOR KEN MAR HTI ARGFJI ISR PAK MEXPHL PNGPRY UGA THA ETH BRACOL MUS PAN SLV TUR IDN BGD URY MYS EGY IND TTO AGO NGA ZAF GABSYR KOR IRN CHN VEN HKG BWA SGP TWN Productivity Growth (%) Average productivity growth and capital inflowsfigure between and 2000 for 68 non-oecd countries. Average productivity growth and average capital inflows between 1980 and non-oecd countries The allocation puzzle is illustrated by Figure 1, which plots the average growth rate of total factor productivity (TFP) against the average ratio of net capital inflows to GDPfor 68 developing 2 Downloaded from at Unive 2 / 31
4 Motivation I Gourinchas and Jeanne GOURINCHAS (2013): the & JEANNE capital allocation THE ALLOCATION puzzle PUZZLE 1485 Capital Inflows (percent of GDP) RWA TGO MOZ COG TZA MLI SEN MWI NER MDG CIV HND BOL CRI BEN LKA PER JAM NPL CHL CYP CMR GHA ECU GTM TUN DOM JOR KEN MAR HTI ARGFJI ISR PAK MEXPHL PNGPRY UGA THA ETH BRACOL MUS PAN SLV TUR IDN BGD URY MYS EGY IND TTO AGO NGA ZAF GABSYR KOR IRN CHN VEN HKG BWA SGP TWN Productivity Growth (%) Average productivity growth and capital inflowsfigure between and 2000 for 68 non-oecd countries. Average productivity growth and average capital inflows between 1980 and non-oecd countries In this paper, we swap the axes of this plot: can international capital flows alter The allocation puzzle is illustrated by Figure 1, which plots the average growth rate of total productivity growth factor productivity trajectories? (TFP) against the average ratio of net capital inflows to GDPfor 68 developing 2 Downloaded from at Unive 2 / 31
5 3 / 31 Motivation II 1. What is the relationship between openness and growth? trade openness financial openness
6 3 / 31 Motivation II 1. What is the relationship between openness and growth? trade openness financial openness 2. Is it possible to borrow like Argentina or Spain and grow like China? (i) What is wrong with Spanish-style (consumption-led) growth? (ii) What is special about Chinese-style (export-led) growth?
7 3 / 31 Motivation II 1. What is the relationship between openness and growth? trade openness financial openness 2. Is it possible to borrow like Argentina or Spain and grow like China? (i) What is wrong with Spanish-style (consumption-led) growth? (ii) What is special about Chinese-style (export-led) growth? A model of endogenous convergence growth to open the blackbox of productivity evolution under different openness regimes a neoclassical (DRS) environment with endogenous innovation decisions by entrepreneurs emphasis on the feedback from international borrowing into the pace and composition (T vs NT) of convergence
8 4 / 31 Empirical Motivation I Figure 1: CA imbalances in the Euro Zone
9 4 / 31 Empirical Motivation II Figure 1: Sectoral reallocation in the Euro Zone (Piton, 2017)
10 5 / 31 Main Insights Openness has two effects (on incentives for innovation): (i) change in relative market size (ii) increase in foreign competition and domestic cost of production, a price effect
11 5 / 31 Main Insights Openness has two effects (on incentives for innovation): (i) change in relative market size (ii) increase in foreign competition and domestic cost of production, a price effect With balanced trade, it s a wash: trade openness does not affect the pace and direction of productivity growth
12 5 / 31 Main Insights Openness has two effects (on incentives for innovation): (i) change in relative market size (ii) increase in foreign competition and domestic cost of production, a price effect With balanced trade, it s a wash: trade openness does not affect the pace and direction of productivity growth Trade deficits (a) unambiguously favor non-tradable sector and (b) tend to reduce pace of innovation reduced-form relationship between NX and sectoral growth furthermore, NX /Y is a sufficient statistic trade surpluses promote GDP growth
13 5 / 31 Main Insights Openness has two effects (on incentives for innovation): (i) change in relative market size (ii) increase in foreign competition and domestic cost of production, a price effect With balanced trade, it s a wash: trade openness does not affect the pace and direction of productivity growth Trade deficits (a) unambiguously favor non-tradable sector and (b) tend to reduce pace of innovation reduced-form relationship between NX and sectoral growth furthermore, NX /Y is a sufficient statistic trade surpluses promote GDP growth Sudden stops in financial flows followed by both recessions and fast tradable productivity growth take off
14 Main Insights Openness has two effects (on incentives for innovation): (i) change in relative market size (ii) increase in foreign competition and domestic cost of production, a price effect With balanced trade, it s a wash: trade openness does not affect the pace and direction of productivity growth Trade deficits (a) unambiguously favor non-tradable sector and (b) tend to reduce pace of innovation reduced-form relationship between NX and sectoral growth furthermore, NX /Y is a sufficient statistic trade surpluses promote GDP growth Sudden stops in financial flows followed by both recessions and fast tradable productivity growth take off Laissez-faire productivity growth is in general suboptimal capital controls may improve upon market allocation 5 / 31
15 6 / 31 Literature Neoclassical investment theory: Barro, Mankiw & Sala-i-Martin (1995) Learning-by-doing and dutch disease Corden and Neary (1982), Krugman (1987), Young (1991), Benigno and Fornaro (2012, 2014) Export-led growth: Rajan and Subramanian (2005), Rodrik (2008) Trade and growth Rivera-Batiz and Romer (1991), Grossman and Helpman (1993), Ventura (1997), Acemoglu and Ventura (2002), Parente and Prescott (2002) Empirics: Frankel and Romer (1999), Ben-David (1993), Dollar and Kraay (2003) Financial flows and growth: Aioke, Benigno and Kiyotaki (2009), Alfaro, Kalemli-Özcan, and Volosovych (2008), Gopinath et al (2017) Trade and growth with Frechet distributions and beyond Kortum (1997), EK (2001, 2002), Klette and Kortum (2004) Alvarez, Buera and Lucas (2017), Perla, Tonetti and Waugh (2015)...
16 Model Setup
17 Model Setup Real small open economy in continuous time exogenous world interest rate r in terms of world good Two sector economy: γ tradable (exportable) and 1 γ non-tradable (non-exportable) and symmetric in all other respects 7 / 31
18 Model Setup Real small open economy in continuous time exogenous world interest rate r in terms of world good Two sector economy: γ tradable (exportable) and 1 γ non-tradable (non-exportable) and symmetric in all other respects Rest of the world (ROW) in steady state: W = A T = A N = A and P F = P N = P = 1 We study convergence growth trajectories: A T (0), A N (0) < Ā A Growth results from new product creation by profit-maximizing entrepreneurs 7 / 31
19 8 / 31 Households Representative household: max {C(t),L(t)} 0 e ϑt U(t)dt, U = 1 1 σ C 1 σ 1 1+ϕ L1+ϕ s.t. Ḃ = r B + WL + Π }{{}}{{} PC =GDP =Y
20 8 / 31 Households Representative household: max {C(t),L(t)} 0 e ϑt U(t)dt, U = 1 1 σ C 1 σ 1 1+ϕ L1+ϕ s.t. Ḃ = r B + WL + Π }{{}}{{} PC =GDP =Y Static market clearing (goods and labor): WL = Y + NX, C σ L ϕ = W /P
21 9 / 31 Demand Two sectors: Y = PC = γp T C T + (1 γ)p N C N where [ C = C γ T C 1 γ N and C T = κ 1 ρ C ρ 1 ρ F + (1 κ) 1 ρ C H ρ 1 ρ ] ρ ρ 1, ρ > 1 Aggregators of individual varieties: C H = [ 1 ΛT γ 0 ] ρ C H (i) ρ 1 ρ 1 ρ di and C N = [ 1 ΛN 1 γ 0 ] ρ C N (i) ρ 1 ρ 1 ρ di
22 Exports and Imports Tradable expenditure: γp T C T = ΛT 0 P H (i)c H (i)di + γp F C F Aggregate imports: ( ) 1 ρ X PF = γp F C F = γκ Y, P F = τpf = τ P T Aggregate exports: Net exports: X = γp HC H = γκ(τp H ) 1 ρ Y NX = X X = γκτ 1 ρ [ P 1 ρ H ] Y P ρ 1 Y T 10 / 31
23 11 / 31 Technology and Revenues Technology of product i [0, Λ J ] in sector J {T, N}: Y J (i) = A J (i)l J (i)
24 11 / 31 Technology and Revenues Technology of product i [0, Λ J ] in sector J {T, N}: Y J (i) = A J (i)l J (i) Marginal cost pricing if technology is non-excludable: P H = W /A T where A T = [ 1 ΛT γ A 0 T (i) ρ 1 di ] 1 ρ 1
25 Technology and Revenues Technology of product i [0, Λ J ] in sector J {T, N}: Y J (i) = A J (i)l J (i) Marginal cost pricing if technology is non-excludable: P H = W /A T where A T = [ 1 ΛT γ A 0 T (i) ρ 1 di ] 1 ρ 1 Revenues: where R N = Y and ( ) 1 ρ PN (i) R N (i) = P N (i)c N (i) = R N, P N ( ) 1 ρ R T (i) = P H (i)c H (i) + PH(i)C H(i) PH (i) = R T R T = (1 κ) ( PH P T P H ) 1 ρ Y + κ(τp H ) 1 ρ Y = Y [ 1 + NX ] γy 11 / 31
26 12 / 31 Technology Draws An entrepreneur has n 1 possible ideas (projects): Z J(l) (l) iid Frechet(z, θ), l = 1..n, θ > ρ 1 A fraction γ of ideas are tradable, J(l) = T
27 12 / 31 Technology Draws An entrepreneur has n 1 possible ideas (projects): Z J(l) (l) iid Frechet(z, θ), l = 1..n, θ > ρ 1 A fraction γ of ideas are tradable, J(l) = T An entrepreneur can adopt only one project The technology is privately owned for one period
28 12 / 31 Technology Draws An entrepreneur has n 1 possible ideas (projects): Z J(l) (l) iid Frechet(z, θ), l = 1..n, θ > ρ 1 A fraction γ of ideas are tradable, J(l) = T An entrepreneur can adopt only one project The technology is privately owned for one period Period profits: Π T (l) = 1 ( ) 1 ρ ρ W 1 R T ρ ρ 1 Z T (l) P H Π N (l) = 1 ( ) 1 ρ ρ W 1 R N ρ ρ 1 Z N (l) P N
29 Technology Draws An entrepreneur has n 1 possible ideas (projects): Z J(l) (l) iid Frechet(z, θ), l = 1..n, θ > ρ 1 A fraction γ of ideas are tradable, J(l) = T An entrepreneur can adopt only one project The technology is privately owned for one period Period profits: Π T (l) = 1 ( ) 1 ρ ρ W 1 R T = ϱ R T ρ ρ 1 Z T (l) P H A ρ 1 Z T (l) ρ 1 T Π N (l) = 1 ( ) 1 ρ ρ W 1 R N = ϱ R N ρ ρ 1 Z N (l) P N A ρ 1 Z N (l) ρ 1 N 12 / 31
30 13 / 31 Technology Adoption Project choice: and we define (Ẑ T, Ẑ N, Ẑ) and (ˆΠ T, ˆΠ N, ˆΠ) ˆl = arg max l=1..n Π J(l)(l)
31 13 / 31 Technology Adoption Project choice: and we define (Ẑ T, Ẑ N, Ẑ) and (ˆΠ T, ˆΠ N, ˆΠ) ˆl = arg max l=1..n Π J(l)(l) Lemma 1 (i) The probability to adopt a tradable project: π T P{ˆΠ T ˆΠ N } = γ χ θ ρ 1, χ γ χ θ ρ γ ( PH P N ) ρ 1 R T R N.
32 13 / 31 Technology Adoption Project choice: and we define (Ẑ T, Ẑ N, Ẑ) and (ˆΠ T, ˆΠ N, ˆΠ) ˆl = arg max l=1..n Π J(l)(l) Lemma 1 (i) The probability to adopt a tradable project: π T P{ˆΠ T ˆΠ N } = γ χ θ ρ 1, χ γ χ θ ρ γ ( AN A T ) ρ 1 R T R N.
33 Technology Adoption Project choice: and we define (Ẑ T, Ẑ N, Ẑ) and (ˆΠ T, ˆΠ N, ˆΠ) ˆl = arg max l=1..n Π J(l)(l) Lemma 1 (i) The probability to adopt a tradable project: π T P{ˆΠ T ˆΠ N } = (ii) The productivity conditional on adoption: E γ χ θ ρ 1, χ γ χ θ ρ γ ρ 1 {Ẑ T ˆΠT ˆΠ } ( πt N = γ ( AN A T ) ν 1 A ρ 1, ) ρ 1 R T R N. where A EẐ = (nz)1/θ Γ(ν) 1 ρ 1 and ν 1 ρ 1 θ (0, 1). 13 / 31
34 14 / 31 Productivity Dynamics λ is the innovation rate and δ is the rate at which technologies become obsolete: Assume λ is country-specific and λ δ Λ T = λπ T δλ T
35 14 / 31 Productivity Dynamics λ is the innovation rate and δ is the rate at which technologies become obsolete: Assume λ is country-specific and λ δ Λ T = λπ T δλ T Lemma 2 The sectoral productivity dynamics is given by: [ A ( T = δ ) ρ 1 ( ) ν ( Ā πt λ 1] where A T ρ 1 γ Ā A δ A T ) 1 ρ 1.
36 15 / 31 Summary [ A T (t) A T (t) = 1 ( ) A ρ 1 ( ) ν πt (t) λ δ], ρ 1 A T (t) γ π T (t) 1 π T (t) = γ 1 γ χ(t) θ ρ 1, χ = B(0) + ( PH P N 0 ) ρ 1 R T R N = e rt NX (t) = 0. ( AN A T ) ρ 1 [ 1 + NX ], γy
37 Closed Economy
38 16 / 31 Closed Economy, κ 0 In closed economy R T = R N = Y, and therefore: ( ) ρ 1 PH χ = = P N ( ) ρ 1 AN A T The project choice is, thus: π T (t) 1 π T (t) = γ 1 γ ( ) θ AN (t) A T (t)
39 Closed Economy, κ 0 In closed economy R T = R N = Y, and therefore: ( ) ρ 1 PH χ = = P N ( ) ρ 1 AN A T The project choice is, thus: π T (t) 1 π T (t) = γ 1 γ ( ) θ AN (t) A T (t) Proposition 1 (i) Starting from A T (0) = A N (0), equilibrium project choice in the closed economy is π T (t) γ, A T (t) = [ e δt A T (0) ρ 1 + ( 1 e δt) Ā ρ 1] 1 ρ 1 (ii) Equilibrium allocation C = w 1+ϕ σ+ϕ, L = w 1 σ σ+ϕ, w = A. and Λ T = γ λ δ. (iii) Efficiency: / 31
40 Balanced Trade
41 17 / 31 Balanced Trade Consider open economy with κ > 0 and τ 1 Lemma 3 (i) The relative revenue shifter is given by: R T R N = (1 κ) ( PH P T ) 1 ρ + κ(τp H ) 1 ρ Y Y = 1 + NX γy. (ii) Under balanced trade, χ = (A N /A T ) ρ 1, and hence π T (t) and (A T (t), A N (t)) follow the same path as in autarky.
42 17 / 31 Balanced Trade Consider open economy with κ > 0 and τ 1 Lemma 3 (i) The relative revenue shifter is given by: R T R N = (1 κ) ( PH P T ) 1 ρ + κ(τp H ) 1 ρ Y Y = 1 + NX γy. (ii) Under balanced trade, χ = (A N /A T ) ρ 1, and hence π T (t) and (A T (t), A N (t)) follow the same path as in autarky. Equilibrium allocation is nonetheless different from autarkic: ( 1 A ) κγ 1+(2 κ)(ρ 1) w = C = A τ 2ρ 1 A T
43 17 / 31 Balanced Trade Consider open economy with κ > 0 and τ 1 Lemma 3 (i) The relative revenue shifter is given by: R T R N = (1 κ) ( PH P T ) 1 ρ + κ(τp H ) 1 ρ Y Y = 1 + NX γy. (ii) Under balanced trade, χ = (A N /A T ) ρ 1, and hence π T (t) and (A T (t), A N (t)) follow the same path as in autarky. Equilibrium allocation is nonetheless different from autarkic: ( 1 A ) κγ 1+(2 κ)(ρ 1) w = C = A τ 2ρ 1 A T Laisser-faire productivity dynamics is suboptimal. The planner would choose π T (t) < γ for all t 0.
44 Open Economy
45 Financial Openness With open current account: π T = γ 1 π T 1 γ ( AN A T ) θ [ 1 + NX ] θ ρ 1 γy 18 / 31
46 Financial Openness With open current account: π T = γ 1 π T 1 γ ( AN A T ) θ [ 1 + NX ] θ ρ 1 γy Lemma 4 NX (t)<0 and A T (t) A N (t) A T (t)< A N (t). Proposition 5 In st.st. with NX = r B > 0: Ā T > Ā > Ā N. Proposition 6 Starting from A T (0) = A N (0) < Ā, there exist two cutoffs 0 < t 1 < t 2 < : NX (t) < 0 for t [0, t 1) and NX (t) > 0 for t > t 1, and A T (t) < A N (t) for t (0, t 2) and A T (t) > A N (t) for t > t 2. At t = t 2, A T (t) = A N (t) = A(t) < A a (t). 18 / 31
47 19 / 31 Convergence Path Figure 2: Productivity convergence in closed and open economies
48 Impact of Openness Two effects of openness: 1. Relative size of the market: Y /Y 2. Competition: P T /P H < NX ( ) [ 1 ρ ( γy = PH τ (1 κ) + κ P T P H =X /X {}}{ ) 1 ρ P 1 ρ H Y P ρ 1 T Y ] 20 / 31
49 Endogenous Innovation
50 21 / 31 Endogenous Innovation Rate Entrepreneurship decision as in Lucas (1978) if EˆΠ φw : ( ) EˆΠ EˆΠ λ = Φ and W W = ϱr { N/W E max A ρ 1 N Lemma 5 EˆΠ ( A W = ϱ A A Â θ ) ρ 1 ( Ψ 1 + NX ) Y χẑ ρ 1 T }, Ẑ ρ 1 N
51 21 / 31 Endogenous Innovation Rate Entrepreneurship decision as in Lucas (1978) if EˆΠ φw : ( ) EˆΠ EˆΠ λ = Φ and W W = ϱr { N/W E max A ρ 1 N Lemma 5 EˆΠ ( A W = ϱ A A Â θ ) ρ 1 ( Ψ 1 + NX ) Y Proposition 8 (i) λ is increasing in A /A and in A/Âθ 1. (ii) λ increases with trade openness iff σ < 1 and ϕ <. [ ( ) 1 γ ] (iii) When σ = 1, Ψ 1 + AN A T ϕ NX 1+ϕ Y, and λ increases with NX when A N A T. χẑ ρ 1 T }, Ẑ ρ 1 N
52 Endogenous Innovation Rate Entrepreneurship decision as in Lucas (1978) if EˆΠ φw : ( ) EˆΠ EˆΠ λ = Φ and W W = ϱr { N/W E max A ρ 1 N Lemma 5 EˆΠ ( A W = ϱ A A Â θ ) ρ 1 ( Ψ 1 + NX ) Y Proposition 8 (i) λ is increasing in A /A and in A/Âθ 1. (ii) λ increases with trade openness iff σ < 1 and ϕ <. [ ( ) 1 γ ] (iii) When σ = 1, Ψ 1 + AN A T ϕ NX 1+ϕ Y, and λ increases with NX when A N A T. χẑ ρ 1 T }, Ẑ ρ 1 Endogenous non-tradable tilt reinforces the negative effect of trade deficits on innovation rate N Induced NX > 0 with policy if the goal is max growth rate 21 / 31
53 Empirical Implications
54 22 / 31 Empirical Implications Reduced-form relationship between NX and sectoral growth: with g 0 δ ρ 1 Ȧ T (t) A T (t) ȦN(t) [ A N (t) = g0 (ρ 1) (1 + µ) log A T (t) A N (t) + µ γ ( λ δ A A 0 ) ρ 1, which is also the base growth rate holds whether NX 0 are market outcomes or policy-induced i.e., applies equally for NX < 0 in Spain and NX > 0 in China ] NX (t), Y (0) NX /Y is a sufficient statistic for the feedback effect from equilibrium allocation to sectoral productivity growth
55 23 / 31 Preliminary empirical results KLEMS panel of sector-country productivity growth (17 OECD countries, 33 3-digit sectors, change) Empirical specification: log A ks = d k + d s + b log A 0 ks + c Λ s nx k + ε ks log A ks is productivity growth in sector s, country k Λ s is median sector-level home share across countries
56 Preliminary empirical results KLEMS panel of sector-country productivity growth (17 OECD countries, 33 3-digit sectors, change) Empirical specification: log A ks = d k + d s + b log A 0 ks + c Λ s nx k + ε ks Dep. var: VA/L RVA/L KLEMS VA/L RVA/L log A ks (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Λ s nx k (0.10) (0.15) (0.20) (0.14) (0.14) log A 0 ks (1.76) (0.98) (0.72) (0.73) (0.56) R Observations % trade deficit reduces relative sectoral productivity growth by 1% across tradability quartiles (25th 75th) 23 / 31
57 24 / 31 Unit Labor Costs Two ULC measures: w/a and W /A T move together holding τ constant Autarky (assume σ = 1): w a (t) = C a (t) = A(t) Balanced trade: ( ) κγ A w b (t) = C b 1+(2 κ)(ρ 1) (t) = A(t) > A(t) A T (t) Open financial account: w b (0) < w(0) < C(0) ULC increase on impact and gradually fall along the convergence path
58 Applications
59 25 / 31 Application 1. Physical capital and financial frictions 2. Misallocation and growth policy 3. Rollover crisis Sudden stop in capital flows during transition triggers a reversal in trade deficits and a recession in non-tradable sector Rapid take off in tradable productivity growth, provided labor market can flexibly adjust by a sharp decline in wages
60 26 / 31 Rollover Crisis
61 Conclusion
62 27 / 31 Conclusion Standard endogenous growth forces have a robust implication for the relationship between trade deficits and: 1. non-tradable tilt of innovation 2. overall lower speed of convergence growth Countries that borrow along the convergence growth trajectory are likely to experience asymmetric and slower convergence lagging tradable productivity high unit labor costs and depressed innovation rate particularly vulnerable to rollover crisis along such trajectories Countries that are concerned with GDP growth rather than welfare might find it optimal to subsidize exports
63 Appendix
64 Price Indexes Average sectoral prices: [ 1 ΛT ] 1 [ P H = P H (i) 1 ρ 1 ρ 1 ΛN ] 1 di and PN = P N (i) 1 ρ 1 ρ di γ 0 1 γ 0 Aggregate price indexes: Equilibrium sectoral prices: P = P γ T P1 γ N where P T = [ κp 1 ρ F ] + (1 κ)p 1 ρ 1 1 ρ H P H = W A T, P N = W A N and P F = τ Real wage rate: w = W ( ) ] γ ρ 1 [1 P = A W κ + κ τa T ρ 1, A A γ T A1 γ N 28 / 31
65 29 / 31 Solution for NX Equilibrium system: [ C = w 1+ϕ σ+ϕ 1 + NX ] ϕ σ+ϕ Y where ( W w = A τa T ) κγ and NX Y = γκ ( ) ρ κγ W τa T [ τ 1+ϕ 1 2ρ A σ+ϕ C ( ) ] (1 κγ)+(2 κ)(ρ 1) A W A T τa T
66 30 / 31 Efficiency in Closed Economy Proposition (i) If A T (0) = A N (0), then πt (t) = γ and A T (t) = A N (t) for all t maximizes A(t) for all t. (ii) If A N (t) > A T (t) at some t, then πt (t) ( γ, π T (t) ), and laissez-faire dynamics with π T (t) is suboptimal. Optimal policy satisfies (for J {T, N}): ( ) π 1 ν T 1 γ 1 πt = ξ ( ) ρ 1 T AN, γ ξ N A T where and b J (t)ξ T (t) ξ J (t) = a J (t), ( ) AJ (t) η 1 ( ) ρ 1 ( ) Ā a J (t) A(t) ζ πj (t) ν, b J (t) ϑ + δ A(t) A J (t) γ J b J (t) plays the role of discount rate and a J (t) is the flow benefit ξ T /ξ N = R T /R N in the limit of ϑ (perfect impatience) Otherwise, ξ T /ξ T (1, R T /R N ) Patents with finite time-varying duration can decentralize π T (t) back to slides
67 31 / 31 Comparison with Learning-by-Doing General learning-by-doing formulation: Y T (t) = F ( A T (t), L T (t) ), A T (t) = G ( A T (t), A N (t), L T (t), L N (t) )
68 31 / 31 Comparison with Learning-by-Doing General learning-by-doing formulation: Y T (t) = F ( A T (t), L T (t) ), A T (t) = G ( A T (t), A N (t), L T (t), L N (t) ) Mapping of the baseline model into learning-by-doing: F (A T, L T ) = AL, G(A T, A N, L T, L N ) = G ( A T, π T (A T, A N, L T, L N ) ), [ ( G(A T, π T ) = δ ) ρ 1 ( ) ν Ā πt 1], ρ 1 γ A T π T 1 γ 1 π T γ = ( AN A T ) θ ( RT R N ) θ ρ 1 and R T R N = L T L N
Consumption-led Growth
Consumption-led Growth (preliminary work in progress) Markus Brunnermeier markus@princeton.edu Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas pog@berkeley.edu Oleg Itskhoki itskhoki@princeton.edu Princeton University November
More informationConsumption-led Growth
Consumption-led Growth Markus Brunnermeier markus@princeton.edu Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas pog@berkeley.edu Oleg Itskhoki itskhoki@princeton.edu February 7 218 preliminary and incomplete Abstract What is
More informationConsumption-led Growth
Consumption-led Growth Markus Brunnermeier markus@princeton.edu Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas pog@berkeley.edu Oleg Itskhoki itskhoki@princeton.edu February 13, 218 preliminary and incomplete Abstract What
More informationLecture 10 Optimal Growth Endogenous Growth. Noah Williams
Lecture 10 Optimal Growth Endogenous Growth Noah Williams University of Wisconsin - Madison Economics 702 Spring 2018 Optimal Growth Path Recall we assume exogenous growth in population and productivity:
More informationLecture 9 Endogenous Growth Consumption and Savings. Noah Williams
Lecture 9 Endogenous Growth Consumption and Savings Noah Williams University of Wisconsin - Madison Economics 702/312 Optimal Balanced Growth Therefore we have capital per unit of effective labor in the
More informationEconomic Growth: Lecture 1, Questions and Evidence
14.452 Economic Growth: Lecture 1, Questions and Evidence Daron Acemoglu MIT October 23, 2018 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lecture 1 October 23, 2018 1 / 38 Cross-Country Income Differences Cross-Country
More informationLecture Note 13 The Gains from International Trade: Empirical Evidence Using the Method of Instrumental Variables
Lecture Note 13 The Gains from International Trade: Empirical Evidence Using the Method of Instrumental Variables David Autor, MIT and NBER 14.03/14.003 Microeconomic Theory and Public Policy, Fall 2016
More informationECON 581. The Solow Growth Model, Continued. Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko
ECON 581. The Solow Growth Model, Continued Instructor: Dmytro Hryshko 1 / 38 The Solow model in continuous time Consider the following (difference) equation x(t + 1) x(t) = g(x(t)), where g( ) is some
More informationInternational Trade Lecture 16: Gravity Models (Theory)
14.581 International Trade Lecture 16: Gravity Models (Theory) 14.581 Week 9 Spring 2013 14.581 (Week 9) Gravity Models (Theory) Spring 2013 1 / 44 Today s Plan 1 The Simplest Gravity Model: Armington
More informationCEMMAP Masterclass: Empirical Models of Comparative Advantage and the Gains from Trade 1 Lecture 3: Gravity Models
CEMMAP Masterclass: Empirical Models of Comparative Advantage and the Gains from Trade 1 Lecture 3: Gravity Models Dave Donaldson (MIT) CEMMAP MC July 2018 1 All material based on earlier courses taught
More informationComparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms
Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms Andrew Bernard, Tuck and NBER Stephen e Redding, LSE and CEPR Peter Schott, Yale and NBER 1 Introduction How do economies respond when opening to trade? Classical
More informationInterest Rate Liberalization and Capital Misallocation 1
Interest Rate Liberalization and Capital Misallocation 1 Zheng Liu 1 Pengfei Wang 2 Zhiwei Xu 3 1 Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco 2 Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 3 Shanghai Jiao
More informationSchumpeterian Growth Models
Schumpeterian Growth Models Yin-Chi Wang The Chinese University of Hong Kong November, 2012 References: Acemoglu (2009) ch14 Introduction Most process innovations either increase the quality of an existing
More informationKnowledge licensing in a Model of R&D-driven Endogenous Growth
Knowledge licensing in a Model of R&D-driven Endogenous Growth Vahagn Jerbashian Universitat de Barcelona June 2016 Early growth theory One of the seminal papers, Solow (1957) discusses how physical capital
More informationLandlocked or Policy Locked?
Landlocked or Policy Locked? How Services Trade Protection Deepens Economic Isolation Ingo Borchert joint work with Batshur Gootiiz, Arti Grover and Aaditya Mattoo Development Research Group The World
More informationGlobal Value Chain Participation and Current Account Imbalances
Global Value Chain Participation and Current Account Imbalances Johannes Brumm University of Zurich Georgios Georgiadis European Central Bank Johannes Gräb European Central Bank Fabian Trottner Princeton
More informationInferring Latent Preferences from Network Data
Inferring Latent Preferences from Network John S. Ahlquist 1 Arturas 2 1 UC San Diego GPS 2 NYU 14 November 2015 very early stages Methodological extend latent space models (Hoff et al 2002) to partial
More information1 The Basic RBC Model
IHS 2016, Macroeconomics III Michael Reiter Ch. 1: Notes on RBC Model 1 1 The Basic RBC Model 1.1 Description of Model Variables y z k L c I w r output level of technology (exogenous) capital at end of
More informationEconomic Growth: Lecture 9, Neoclassical Endogenous Growth
14.452 Economic Growth: Lecture 9, Neoclassical Endogenous Growth Daron Acemoglu MIT November 28, 2017. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lecture 9 November 28, 2017. 1 / 41 First-Generation Models
More informationProductivity Losses from Financial Frictions: Can Self-financing Undo Capital Misallocation?
Productivity Losses from Financial Frictions: Can Self-financing Undo Capital Misallocation? Benjamin Moll G Online Appendix: The Model in Discrete Time and with iid Shocks This Appendix presents a version
More informationInternation1al Trade
4.58 International Trade Class notes on 4/8/203 The Armington Model. Equilibrium Labor endowments L i for i = ; :::n CES utility ) CES price index P = i= (w i ij ) P j n Bilateral trade ows follow gravity
More informationInternational Investment Positions and Exchange Rate Dynamics: A Dynamic Panel Analysis
International Investment Positions and Exchange Rate Dynamics: A Dynamic Panel Analysis Michael Binder 1 Christian J. Offermanns 2 1 Frankfurt and Center for Financial Studies 2 Frankfurt Motivation Empirical
More informationModelling Czech and Slovak labour markets: A DSGE model with labour frictions
Modelling Czech and Slovak labour markets: A DSGE model with labour frictions Daniel Němec Faculty of Economics and Administrations Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic nemecd@econ.muni.cz ESF MU (Brno)
More informationAdvanced Economic Growth: Lecture 3, Review of Endogenous Growth: Schumpeterian Models
Advanced Economic Growth: Lecture 3, Review of Endogenous Growth: Schumpeterian Models Daron Acemoglu MIT September 12, 2007 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Advanced Growth Lecture 3 September 12, 2007 1 / 40 Introduction
More informationExpanding Variety Models
Expanding Variety Models Yin-Chi Wang The Chinese University of Hong Kong November, 2012 References: Acemoglu (2009) ch13 Introduction R&D and technology adoption are purposeful activities The simplest
More information14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 4 Competition and Innovation
14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 4 Competition and Innovation Daron Acemoglu MIT September 19, 2011. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Competition and Innovation September 19, 2011. 1 / 51 Competition and Innovation
More informationMIT PhD International Trade Lecture 15: Gravity Models (Theory)
14.581 MIT PhD International Trade Lecture 15: Gravity Models (Theory) Dave Donaldson Spring 2011 Introduction to Gravity Models Recall that in this course we have so far seen a wide range of trade models:
More informationENDOGENOUS GROWTH. Carl-Johan Dalgaard Department of Economics University of Copenhagen
ENDOGENOUS GROWTH Carl-Johan Dalgaard Department of Economics University of Copenhagen MOTIVATION AND SETTING THE SCENE How to sustain growth? Under standard assumptions (e.g., diminishing returns and
More informationAgriculture, Transportation and the Timing of Urbanization
Agriculture, Transportation and the Timing of Urbanization Global Analysis at the Grid Cell Level Mesbah Motamed Raymond Florax William Masters Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University SHaPE
More information14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 3 Competition, Policy and Technological Progress
14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 3 Competition, Policy and Technological Progress Daron Acemoglu MIT September 15, 2016. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Competition, Policy and Innovation September 15, 2016.
More informationAggregate Demand, Idle Time, and Unemployment
Aggregate Demand, Idle Time, and Unemployment Pascal Michaillat (LSE) & Emmanuel Saez (Berkeley) September 2014 1 / 44 Motivation 11% Unemployment rate 9% 7% 5% 3% 1974 1984 1994 2004 2014 2 / 44 Motivation
More informationTrade, Neoclassical Growth and Heterogeneous Firms
Trade, Neoclassical Growth and eterogeneous Firms Julian Emami Namini Department of Economics, University of Duisburg Essen, Campus Essen, Germany Email: emami@vwl.uni essen.de 10th March 2006 Abstract
More informationA Modern Equilibrium Model. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania
A Modern Equilibrium Model Jesús Fernández-Villaverde University of Pennsylvania 1 Household Problem Preferences: max E X β t t=0 c 1 σ t 1 σ ψ l1+γ t 1+γ Budget constraint: c t + k t+1 = w t l t + r t
More informationAggregate Demand, Idle Time, and Unemployment
Aggregate Demand, Idle Time, and Unemployment Pascal Michaillat (LSE) & Emmanuel Saez (Berkeley) July 2014 1 / 46 Motivation 11% Unemployment rate 9% 7% 5% 3% 1974 1984 1994 2004 2014 2 / 46 Motivation
More informationDynamics of Firms and Trade in General Equilibrium. Robert Dekle, Hyeok Jeong and Nobuhiro Kiyotaki USC, Seoul National University and Princeton
Dynamics of Firms and Trade in General Equilibrium Robert Dekle, Hyeok Jeong and Nobuhiro Kiyotaki USC, Seoul National University and Princeton Figure a. Aggregate exchange rate disconnect (levels) 28.5
More information(a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming
1. Government Purchases and Endogenous Growth Consider the following endogenous growth model with government purchases (G) in continuous time. Government purchases enhance production, and the production
More informationLabor Union and the Wealth-Income Ratio
Labor Union and the Wealth-Income Ratio Angus C. Chu Zonglai Kou Xueyue Liu November 2017 Abstract We explore how labor union affects the wealth-income ratio in an innovation-driven growth model and find
More informationLandlocked or Policy Locked?
Landlocked or Policy Locked? How Services Trade Protection Deepens Economic Isolation Ingo Borchert University of Sussex Based on research with Batshur Gootiiz, Arti Grover and Aaditya Mattoo FERDI ITC
More informationMeasuring the Gains from Trade: They are Large!
Measuring the Gains from Trade: They are Large! Andrés Rodríguez-Clare (UC Berkeley and NBER) May 12, 2012 Ultimate Goal Quantify effects of trade policy changes Instrumental Question How large are GT?
More informationOn the Geography of Global Value Chains
On the Geography of Global Value Chains Pol Antràs and Alonso de Gortari Harvard University March 31, 2016 Antràs & de Gortari (Harvard University) On the Geography of GVCs March 31, 2016 1 / 27 Introduction
More informationGrowth: Facts and Theories
Notes on Growth: Facts and Theories Intermediate Macroeconomics Spring 2006 Guido Menzio University of Pennsylvania Growth In the last part of the course we are going to study economic growth, i.e. the
More informationAggregate Implications of Innovation Policy
Aggregate Implications of Innovation Policy Andrew Atkeson University of California, Los Angeles, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, and National Bureau of Economic Research Ariel T. Burstein University
More informationAdvanced Economic Growth: Lecture 8, Technology Di usion, Trade and Interdependencies: Di usion of Technology
Advanced Economic Growth: Lecture 8, Technology Di usion, Trade and Interdependencies: Di usion of Technology Daron Acemoglu MIT October 3, 2007 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Advanced Growth Lecture 8 October 3,
More informationGranular Comparative Advantage
Granular Comparative Advantage Cecile Gaubert cecile.gaubert@berkeley.edu Oleg Itskhoki itskhoki@princeton.edu Stanford University March 2018 1 / 26 Exports are Granular Freund and Pierola (2015): Export
More informationNeoclassical Business Cycle Model
Neoclassical Business Cycle Model Prof. Eric Sims University of Notre Dame Fall 2015 1 / 36 Production Economy Last time: studied equilibrium in an endowment economy Now: study equilibrium in an economy
More informationLecture 2: Firms, Jobs and Policy
Lecture 2: Firms, Jobs and Policy Economics 522 Esteban Rossi-Hansberg Princeton University Spring 2014 ERH (Princeton University ) Lecture 2: Firms, Jobs and Policy Spring 2014 1 / 34 Restuccia and Rogerson
More informationEndogenous growth theory. Tom Holden PhD Macroeconomics, Semester 2
Endogenous growth theory Tom Holden http://www.tholden.org/ PhD Macroeconomics, Semester 2 Outline of today s talk First generation endogenous growth models. Semi-endogenous growth models. Second generation
More informationproblem. max Both k (0) and h (0) are given at time 0. (a) Write down the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) Equation in the dynamic programming
1. Endogenous Growth with Human Capital Consider the following endogenous growth model with both physical capital (k (t)) and human capital (h (t)) in continuous time. The representative household solves
More informationExternal Economies of Scale and Industrial Policy: A View from Trade
External Economies of Scale and Industrial Policy: A View from Trade Dominick Bartelme (Michigan) Arnaud Costinot (MIT) Dave Donaldson (MIT) Andrés Rodríguez-Clare (Berkeley) External Economies of Scale
More informationChapter 3 Task 1-4. Growth and Innovation Fridtjof Zimmermann
Chapter 3 Task 1-4 Growth and Innovation Fridtjof Zimmermann Recept on how to derive the Euler-Equation (Keynes-Ramsey-Rule) 1. Construct the Hamiltonian Equation (Lagrange) H c, k, t, μ = U + μ(side Condition)
More informationEconomic Growth: Lecture 8, Overlapping Generations
14.452 Economic Growth: Lecture 8, Overlapping Generations Daron Acemoglu MIT November 20, 2018 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lecture 8 November 20, 2018 1 / 46 Growth with Overlapping Generations
More informationAdvanced Macroeconomics
Advanced Macroeconomics The Ramsey Model Marcin Kolasa Warsaw School of Economics Marcin Kolasa (WSE) Ad. Macro - Ramsey model 1 / 30 Introduction Authors: Frank Ramsey (1928), David Cass (1965) and Tjalling
More informationRamsey Cass Koopmans Model (1): Setup of the Model and Competitive Equilibrium Path
Ramsey Cass Koopmans Model (1): Setup of the Model and Competitive Equilibrium Path Ryoji Ohdoi Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Economics, Tokyo Tech This lecture note is mainly based on Ch. 8 of Acemoglu
More informationWeb Appendix for Heterogeneous Firms and Trade (Not for Publication)
Web Appendix for Heterogeneous Firms and Trade Not for Publication Marc J. Melitz Harvard University, NBER and CEPR Stephen J. Redding Princeton University, NBER and CEPR December 17, 2012 1 Introduction
More informationDynamics and Monetary Policy in a Fair Wage Model of the Business Cycle
Dynamics and Monetary Policy in a Fair Wage Model of the Business Cycle David de la Croix 1,3 Gregory de Walque 2 Rafael Wouters 2,1 1 dept. of economics, Univ. cath. Louvain 2 National Bank of Belgium
More informationStagnation Traps. Gianluca Benigno and Luca Fornaro
Stagnation Traps Gianluca Benigno and Luca Fornaro May 2015 Research question and motivation Can insu cient aggregate demand lead to economic stagnation? This question goes back, at least, to the Great
More informationEcon 204A: Section 3
Econ 204A: Section 3 Ryan Sherrard University of California, Santa Barbara 18 October 2016 Sherrard (UCSB) Section 3 18 October 2016 1 / 19 Notes on Problem Set 2 Total Derivative Review sf (k ) = (δ +
More informationChapter 7. Endogenous Growth II: R&D and Technological Change
Chapter 7 Endogenous Growth II: R&D and Technological Change 225 Economic Growth: Lecture Notes 7.1 Expanding Product Variety: The Romer Model There are three sectors: one for the final good sector, one
More information!" #$$% & ' ' () ) * ) )) ' + ( ) + ) +( ), - ). & " '" ) / ) ' ' (' + 0 ) ' " ' ) () ( ( ' ) ' 1)
!" #$$% & ' ' () ) * ) )) ' + ( ) + ) +( ), - ). & " '" ) () -)( / ) ' ' (' + 0 ) ' " ' ) () ( ( ' ) ' 1) )) ) 2') 3 45$" 467" 8" 4 %" 96$ & ' 4 )" 3)" ::" ( & ) ;: < ( ) ) =)+ ( " " " $8> " ') +? @ ::
More informationThe Political Economy of International Factor Mobility
The Political Economy of International Factor Mobility Giovanni Facchini Department of Economics University of Illinois Gerald Willmann Department of Economics Universität zu Kiel prepared for Presentation
More informationSignaling Effects of Monetary Policy
Signaling Effects of Monetary Policy Leonardo Melosi London Business School 24 May 2012 Motivation Disperse information about aggregate fundamentals Morris and Shin (2003), Sims (2003), and Woodford (2002)
More informationGranular Comparative Advantage
Granular Comparative Advantage Cecile Gaubert cecile.gaubert@berkeley.edu Oleg Itskhoki itskhoki@princeton.edu RASA IX International Conference Washington DC November 218 1 / 28 Exports are Granular Freund
More informationA Two Country Model of Public Infrastructure Capital: Trade Patterns and Trade Gains in the Long Run
A Two Country Model of Public Infrastructure Capital: Trade Patterns and Trade ains in the Long un Akihiko Yanase raduate School of Economics, Nagoya University Makoto Tawada Faculty of Economics, Aichi
More informationCan News be a Major Source of Aggregate Fluctuations?
Can News be a Major Source of Aggregate Fluctuations? A Bayesian DSGE Approach Ippei Fujiwara 1 Yasuo Hirose 1 Mototsugu 2 1 Bank of Japan 2 Vanderbilt University August 4, 2009 Contributions of this paper
More informationInternation1al Trade
14.581 Internation1al Trade Class notes on 3/4/2013 1 Factor Proportion Theory The law of comparative advantage establishes the relationship between relative autarky prices and trade ows But where do relative
More informationTechnological Spillovers and Dynamics of Comparative Advantage
Technological Spillovers and Dynamics of Comparative Advantage Yury Yatsynovich University of California, Berkeley January 21, 2015 MOTIVATION Comparative advantage is dynamic: Korea from rice to microchips.
More informationThe Ramsey Model. (Lecture Note, Advanced Macroeconomics, Thomas Steger, SS 2013)
The Ramsey Model (Lecture Note, Advanced Macroeconomics, Thomas Steger, SS 213) 1 Introduction The Ramsey model (or neoclassical growth model) is one of the prototype models in dynamic macroeconomics.
More informationThe TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam?
The TransPacific agreement A good thing for VietNam? Jean Louis Brillet, France For presentation at the LINK 2014 Conference New York, 22nd 24th October, 2014 Advertisement!!! The model uses EViews The
More informationEndogenous IPR and Economic Growth
Endogenous IPR and Economic Growth Andreas Schäfer University of Leipzig Maik T. Schneider ETH Zurich Preliminary version 8. May 2008 Abstract Why are intellectual property rights in some countries higher
More informationMacroeconomics Qualifying Examination
Macroeconomics Qualifying Examination August 2015 Department of Economics UNC Chapel Hill Instructions: This examination consists of 4 questions. Answer all questions. If you believe a question is ambiguously
More informationOnline Appendix for Investment Hangover and the Great Recession
ONLINE APPENDIX INVESTMENT HANGOVER A1 Online Appendix for Investment Hangover and the Great Recession By MATTHEW ROGNLIE, ANDREI SHLEIFER, AND ALP SIMSEK APPENDIX A: CALIBRATION This appendix describes
More informationOn the dynamics of the Heckscher-Ohlin theory
On the dynamics of the Heckscher-Ohlin theory Lorenzo Caliendo The University of Chicago 2010 Introduction "...free commodity trade will, under certain speci ed conditions, inevitably lead to complete
More informationOn pollution and R&D-based growth in a trade model between countries concerned and unconcerned about climate change
On pollution and R&D-based growth in a trade model between countries concerned and unconcerned about climate change Francisco Cabo 1 Guiomar Martín-Herrán 1 M.Pilar Martínez-García 2 1 IMUVa, Dpt. Economía
More informationOptimal Simple And Implementable Monetary and Fiscal Rules
Optimal Simple And Implementable Monetary and Fiscal Rules Stephanie Schmitt-Grohé Martín Uribe Duke University September 2007 1 Welfare-Based Policy Evaluation: Related Literature (ex: Rotemberg and Woodford,
More informationInterest-Rate Liberalization and Capital Misallocations
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO WORKING PAPER SERIES Interest-Rate Liberalization and Capital Misallocations Zheng Liu Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Pengfei Wang Hong Kong University of Sciences
More informationThe Dynamics of the U.S. Trade Balance and the Real Exchange Rate: The J Curve and Trade Costs? by George Alessandria (Rochester) Horag Choi (Monash)
Discussion of The Dynamics of the U.S. Trade Balance and the Real Exchange Rate: The J Curve and Trade Costs? by George Alessandria (Rochester) Horag Choi (Monash) Brent Neiman University of Chicago and
More informationForeign and Domestic Growth Drivers in Eastern Europe
Foreign and Domestic Growth Drivers in Eastern Europe Enzo Weber Universität Regensburg, OEI Regensburg, IAB Nürnberg June 18, 2010 13th FIW-Workshop Introduction Economic growth in Eastern Europe Transition
More informationEconomic Growth: Lectures 10 and 11, Endogenous Technological Change
14.452 Economic Growth: Lectures 10 and 11, Endogenous Technological Change Daron Acemoglu MIT December 1 and 6, 2011. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 10 end 11 December 1 and 6, 2011. 1
More informationPart A: Answer question A1 (required), plus either question A2 or A3.
Ph.D. Core Exam -- Macroeconomics 5 January 2015 -- 8:00 am to 3:00 pm Part A: Answer question A1 (required), plus either question A2 or A3. A1 (required): Ending Quantitative Easing Now that the U.S.
More informationR&D Investment, Exporting, and Productivity Dynamics
R&D Investment, Exporting, and Productivity Dynamics Bee Yan Aw, Mark J. Roberts, Daniel Yi Xu NASM 2009 Motivation Does openness to trade promote productivity? Exports and firm productivity are correlated
More informationAggregate Implications of Innovation Policy
Aggregate Implications of Innovation Policy Andrew Atkeson Ariel Burstein March 2018 Abstract We examine the quantitative impact of policy-induced changes in innovative investment by firms on growth in
More informationEconomic Growth: Lectures 9 and 10, Endogenous Technological Change
14.452 Economic Growth: Lectures 9 and 10, Endogenous Technological Change Daron Acemoglu MIT Nov. 29 and Dec. 4 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Economic Growth Lectures 9 and 10 Nov. 29 and Dec. 4 1 / 73 Endogenous
More informationINTEREST-RATE LIBERALIZATION AND CAPITAL MISALLOCATIONS. I. Introduction
INTEREST-RATE LIBERALIZATION AND CAPITAL MISALLOCATIONS ZHENG LIU, PENGFEI WANG, AND ZHIWEI XU Abstract. We study the consequences of interest-rate liberalization in a two-sector general equilibrium model
More informationTrade and the political economy of redistribution
Trade and the political economy of redistribution G. Vannoorenberghe b, E. Janeba b a Tilburg University, Room K 420 PO Box 90153 5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands. Tel: +31 13 466 2511 b University of Mannheim,
More informationGraduate Macroeconomics - Econ 551
Graduate Macroeconomics - Econ 551 Tack Yun Indiana University Seoul National University Spring Semester January 2013 T. Yun (SNU) Macroeconomics 1/07/2013 1 / 32 Business Cycle Models for Emerging-Market
More informationInnovation, Firm Dynamics, and International Trade
Innovation, Firm Dynamics, and International Trade Andrew Atkeson y and Ariel Burstein z February 2009 Abstract We present a general equilibrium model of the decisions of rms to innovate and to engage
More information14.461: Technological Change, Lectures 7 and 8 Innovation, Reallocation and Growth
14.461: Technological Change, Lectures 7 and 8 Innovation, Reallocation and Growth Daron Acemoglu MIT September 26 and 30, 2014. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Innovation, Reallocation and Growth September 26 and
More informationSimple New Keynesian Model without Capital
Simple New Keynesian Model without Capital Lawrence J. Christiano January 5, 2018 Objective Review the foundations of the basic New Keynesian model without capital. Clarify the role of money supply/demand.
More informationMacroeconomics Qualifying Examination
Macroeconomics Qualifying Examination January 2016 Department of Economics UNC Chapel Hill Instructions: This examination consists of 3 questions. Answer all questions. If you believe a question is ambiguously
More information14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 1
14.461: Technological Change, Lecture 1 Daron Acemoglu MIT September 8, 2016. Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Technological Change, Lecture 1 September 8, 2016. 1 / 60 Endogenous Technological Change Expanding Variety
More informationGovernment The government faces an exogenous sequence {g t } t=0
Part 6 1. Borrowing Constraints II 1.1. Borrowing Constraints and the Ricardian Equivalence Equivalence between current taxes and current deficits? Basic paper on the Ricardian Equivalence: Barro, JPE,
More informationStructural change in a multi-sector model of the climate and the economy
Structural change in a multi-sector model of the climate and the economy Gustav Engström The Beijer Institute of Environmental Economics Stockholm, December 2012 G. Engström (Beijer) Stockholm, December
More informationOutline of the presentation
The Difference in Development Stages and the Costs of Monetar Union A New Open Econom Macroeconomics model VDF Toko Feb 10, 2007 Vu Tuan Khai Outline of the presentation 1. Introduction 2. The difference
More informationProductivity and Capital Allocation in Europe
Discussion of: Productivity and Capital Allocation in Europe by Gopinath, Kalemli-Ozcan, Karabarbounis, and Villegas-Sanchez Brent Neiman University of Chicago AEA Meetings 215 Static Misallocation (Quick
More informationImporting Skill-Biased Technology
Importing Skill-Biased Technology Ariel Burstein Javier Cravino Jonathan Vogel January 2012 Intro Motivation Observations Capital equipment (e.g. computers and industrial machinery): Implication embodies
More informationAdvanced Economic Growth: Lecture 2, Review of Endogenous Growth: Expanding Variety Models
Advanced Economic Growth: Lecture 2, Review of Endogenous Growth: Expanding Variety Models Daron Acemoglu MIT September 10, 2007 Daron Acemoglu (MIT) Advanced Growth Lecture 2 September 10, 2007 1 / 56
More informationStructural Change, Demographic Transition and Fertility Di erence
Structural Change, Demographic Transition and Fertility Di erence T. Terry Cheung February 14, 2017 T. Terry Cheung () Structural Change and Fertility February 14, 2017 1 / 35 Question Question: The force
More informationLearning and Global Dynamics
Learning and Global Dynamics James Bullard 10 February 2007 Learning and global dynamics The paper for this lecture is Liquidity Traps, Learning and Stagnation, by George Evans, Eran Guse, and Seppo Honkapohja.
More informationMotivation A Figure 1 Figure 2 Table 1 Table 2
Future Work Motivation A Figure 1 Figure 2 Table 1 Table 2 Motivation B Markup Di erences: SOEs vs. POEs Markup Di erences Across Sectors Sectoral Di erences Motivation Key Novelty Model Trade Liberalization,
More informationUnions, Innovation and Cross-Country Wage Inequality
MPRA Munich Personal RePEc Archive Unions, Innovation and Cross-Country Wage Inequality Angus C. Chu and Guido Cozzi and Yuichi Furukawa University of Liverpool, University of St. Gallen, Chukyo University
More information