Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line
|
|
- Tyler French
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Asymptotic Analysis 1 (16) DOI 1.333/ASY IOS Press Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line David Lafontaine Laboratoire de Mathématiques J.A. Dieudonné, UMR CNRS 7351, Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, 618 Nice Cedex, France david.lafontaine@unice.fr Abstract. We show the H 1 scattering for a one dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a non-negative, repulsive potential V such that V,xV W 1,1, and a mass-supercritical non-linearity. We follow the approach of concentrationcompacity/rigidity first introduced by Kenig and Merle. Keywords: nonlinear Schrödinger equation, scattering, potential perturbation 1. Introduction We consider the following one dimensional defocusing, non linear Schrödinger equation with a potential i t u + u Vu= u u α, u() = ϕ H 1 (R). (1.1) If V L 1, + V is essentially self-adjoint, so by Stones theorem the equation is globally well posed in L (R) and e it( +V) is an L -isometry. Goldberg and Schlag obtained in [7] the dispersive estimate e it( +V) ψ L 1 ψ t 1 L 1 under the assumption that V belongs to L 1 1 (R), i.e. V(x) (1 + x )dx <, andthat + V has no resonance at zero energy. In particular, we will consider a non-negative potential, which always verifies this no-resonance hypothesis as we will see in Section. This estimate gives us usual Strichartz estimates described below in the paper. Because of the energy conservation law E ( u(t) ) := 1 u(t) + V u(t) + 1 u(t) α+ = E ( u() ) α + the L -well-posedness result extends to the global well-posedness of the problem (1.1) inh 1 (R): for every ϕ H 1 (R), there exists a unique, global solution u C(R,H 1 (R)) of (1.1). Finally, let us recall that the mass M(u(t)) := u(t) is conserved too /16/$ IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved
2 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line For the mass-supercritical (α >4) homogeneous equation i t u + u = u u α, u() = ϕ H 1 (R) (1.) it is well known since Nakanishi s paper [1] that the solutions scatter in H 1 (R), that is, for every solution u C(R,H 1 (R)) of (1.), there exists a unique couple of data ψ ± H 1 (R) such that u(t) e it ψ H ±. 1 (R) t ± Alternative proofs of this result can be found in [,5,13]and[14]. We prove the scattering of solutions of (1.1) in dimension one for sufficiently regular, non-negative and repulsive potential V. Theorem 1. Let α > 4 and V L 1 1 (R) be such that V L 1 1 (R). We suppose moreover that V is non-negative and repulsive: V and xv. Then, every solution u C(R,H 1 (R)) of (1.1) with potential V scatters in H 1 (R). We use the strategy of concentration-compacity/rigidity first introduced by Kenig and Merle in [11], and extented to the intercritical case by Holmer and Roudenko in [8], Duyckaerts, Holmer and Roudenko in [3]. In the case of a potential, the main difficulty is the lack of translation invariance of the equation. Notice that Hong obtained in [9] the same result in the three dimensional case for the focusing equation. However, his approach cannot be extended to lower dimensions, as it requires endpoint Strichartz estimates which are not available. Banica and Visciglia treated in [1] the case of the non linear Schrödinger equation with a Dirac potential on the line, and we follow their approach. The Dirac potential is more singular, but it allows the use of explicit formulas that are not available in the present more general framework. Remark 1. In dimension one or two, assume that V is smooth and compactly supported, and such that V <. Then the operator + V has a negative eigenvalue: as a consequence, the hypothesis of positivity of V cannot be relaxed as in dimension three, where [9] only supposes that the potential has a small negative part, and, in the same way, the hypothesis of repulsivity, which is needed for the rigidity, cannot be relaxed to xv having a small positive part. Remark. The hypothesis V,V L 1 are needed to show that the operator A = + V verifies the hypothesis of the abstract profile decomposition of [1], whereas the hypothesis xv L 1 and xv are needed in the rigidity part. Remark 3. The same proof holds in dimension two up to the numerology and some changes in the Hölder inequalities used in Propositions 6, 7,and8 to deal with the fact that H 1 (R ) is not embedded in L (R ). Remark 4. In the focusing, mass-supercritical case i t u + u Vu+ u u α = the same arguments could be used to prove the scattering up to the natural threshold given by the ground state associated to the equation, in the spirit of [5].
3 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line Notations We will denote by V a potential on the line satisfying the hypothesis of Theorem 1, α will be a real number such that α>4. We set H 1 = H 1 (R), C ( H 1) = C ( R,H 1 (R) ), L p L r = L p( R,L r (R) ), L p (I)L r = L p( I,L r (R) ) for any interval I of R. We will denote by τ y the translation operator defined by τ y u = u( y). Finally, we will use A B for inequalities of the type A CB where C is a universal constant.. Preliminaries From now on, we will fix the four following Strichartz exponents r = α +, q =.1. Strichartz estimates α(α + ) α(α + ), p =, γ = α α α 4 α + 4 α. Recall that we assume all along the paper that V is in L 1 1 (R) and non negative. Goldberg and Schlag obtained in particular in [7] the dispersive estimate for the Schrödinger operator + V under these assumptions. Indeed, they require the hypothesis of absence of resonances at zero energy. We claim that for V this hypothesis is satisfied: by the definition of [7], if there is a resonance at zero, the solutions u ± of u = Vu (.1) such that u ± (x) 1asx ± have a null Wronskian. Therefore u ± are proportional, so they are both non trivial bounded solutions of (.1). But such solutions cannot exist: indeed, if u is such a solution, integrating (.1) one deduces that u has limits at ±. These limits are both zero otherwise u is not bounded. Now, multiplying (.1) by u, integrating it on [ R,R], and letting R going to infinity, we obtain R u + V u =. Therefore u =, a contradiction. Proposition 1 (Dispersive estimate [7]). Let V L 1 1 (R) be such that V. Then, for all ψ L1 (R), we have e it( +V) ψ L 1 ψ t 1 L 1. (.) Note that, interpolating the previous dispersive estimate (.) with the mass conservation law, we obtain immediately for all a [, ] e it( +V) ψ L a 1 ψ t 1 ( 1 a a 1 ) La. (.3)
4 4 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line Because of (.), we obtain by the classical TT method (see for example [1]) the Strichartz estimates e it( +V) ϕ t L q 1 L r 1 + e i(t s)( +V) F(s)ds ϕ L + F q L q L r L (.4) 3 L r 3 for all pairs (q i,r i ) satisfying the admissibility condition in dimension one, that is q i + 1 r i = 1. We will need moreover the following Strichartz estimates associated to non admissible pairs: Proposition (Strichartz estimates). For all ϕ H 1,allF L q L r,allg L q L r and all H L γ L 1 e it( +V) ϕ L ϕ p L r H 1 (.5) e it( +V) ϕ L ϕ α L H 1 (.6) t e i(t s)( +V) F(s)ds F L q Lr (.7) L α L t e i(t s)( +V) G(s) ds G L q Lr (.8) L p L r t e i(t s)( +V) H(s)ds H L γ L1. (.9) L p L r Proof. The estimates (.5) (.8) are exactly the same as (3.1) (3.4) of [14], with the operator + V instead of H q. As the proof of [14] relies only on the admissible Strichartz estimates (.4) that are given by Proposition 1, the same proof holds here. Finally, (.9) enters on the frame of the non-admissible inhomogeneous Strichartz estimates of Theorem 1.4 of Foschi s paper [6]... Perturbative results We will need the three following classical perturbative results, which follow immediately from the previous Strichartz inequalities: Proposition 3. Let u C(H 1 ) be a solution of (1.1). If u L p L r,thenu scatters in H 1. Proposition 4. There exists ɛ >, such that, for every data ϕ H 1 such that ϕ H 1 ɛ,the corresponding maximal solutions of (1.1) and (1.) both scatter in H 1. Proof of Propositions 3 and 4. The proof is the same as for Propositions 3.1 and 3. of [1], using the Strichartz estimates of our Proposition instead of their estimates (3.1), (3.), (3.3), (3.4).
5 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line 5 Proposition 5. For every M > there exists ɛ>and C>such that the following occurs. Let v C(H 1 ) L p L r be a solution of the following integral equation with source term e(t, x) t v(t) = e it( V) ϕ i e i(t s)( V)( v(s) v(s) α) ds + e(t) with v L p L r <Mand e L p L r <ɛ. Assume moreover that ϕ H 1 is such that e it( V) ϕ L p L r <ɛ. Then, the solution u C(H 1 ) to (1.1) with initial condition ϕ + ϕ satisfies u L p L r, u v L p L r <C. Proof. It is the same as for Proposition 4.7 in [5], using Strichartz estimates (.8) instead of Strichartztype inequality (4.3) of their paper. 3. Profile decomposition The aim of this section is to show that we can use the abstract profile decomposition obtained by [1], and inspired by [4]: Theorem (Astract profile decomposition [1]). Let A : L D(A) L be a self adjoint operator such that: for some positive constants c, C and for all u D(A), c u H 1 (Au, u) + u L C u H 1, (3.1) let B : D(A) D(A) (u, v) (Au, v) + (u, v) L (u, v) H 1 C. Then, as n goes to infinity B(τ xn ψ, τ xn h n ) ψ H 1 (3.) as soon as x n ±, sup h n H 1 < or x n x R, h n H 1, let (t n ) n 1, (x n ) n 1 be sequences of real numbers, and t, x R.Then t n = e it na τ xn ψ L p, <p<, ψ H 1, (3.3) t n t,x n ± = ψ H 1, ϕ H 1, τ xn e it na τ xn ψ H 1 ϕ, (3.4) t n t,x n x = ψ H 1, e it na τ xn ψ H 1 e i ta τ x ψ. (3.5)
6 6 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line And let (u n ) n 1 be a bounded sequence in H 1. Then, up to a subsequence, the following decomposition holds where u n = J e itn j A τ j xn ψ j + Rn J J N, j=1 t n j R, xn j R, ψ j H 1 are such that for any fixed j, t n j = x n j = n, or t j n n, or xj n ± (3.6) ±, (3.7) orthogonality of the parameters: t j n t k n + x j n xn k, j k, (3.8) decay of the reminder: ɛ >, J N, lim supe ita Rn J L ɛ, (3.9) L orthogonality of the Hilbert norm: u n L = u n H = J j=1 ψ j L + R J n L + o n (1), J N (3.1) J τ j xn ψ j H + Rn J + o H n(1), J N (3.11) j=1 where (u, v) H = (Au, v), and u n p L p = J e itj na τ j xn ψ j p + L R J p p n + o L p n (1), <p<, J N. (3.1) j=1 We will see that the self-adjoint operator A := +V verifies the hypothesis of the previous theorem. Proposition 6. Let A := + V.ThenA satisfies the assumptions (3.1), (3.), (3.3), (3.4), (3.5).
7 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line 7 Proof. Assumption (3.1). Because V is positive and by the Sobolev embedding H 1 (R) L, u H (Au, u) + u 1 L = u + V u + u ( ) 1 + V L 1 u H 1 and (3.1) holds. Assumption (3.). We have B(τ xn ψ, τ xn h n ) = Vτ xn ψτ xn h n. If x n x R, h n, then τ xn ψ τ x ψ strongly in L and Vτ xn h n weakly in L (indeed, H 1 note that V W 1,1 (R) L ), so B(τ xn ψ, τ xn h n ). Now, let us assume that x n ± and sup h n H 1 <. For example assume that x n +. ψ H 1 (R) and therefore decays at infinity: ɛ>been fixed, we can choose Λ>large enough so that sup ψ(x) ɛ. x Λ Because V L 1, Λ can also be chosen large enough so that V ɛ. x Λ Then, by the Cauchy Schwarz inequality, and because of the Sobolev embedding H 1 (R) L B(τ xn ψ, τ xn h n ) h n L Vτ xn ψ ( sup h j H 1 Vψ( xn ) + Vψ( xn ) ). j 1 x x n Λ x x n Λ Now, let n be large enough so that for all n n, x n Λ. Then, for all n n x x n Λ x Λ and, for all n n B(τxn ψ, τ xn h n ) ( ) M ɛ V L 1 + ɛ ψ L so (3.) holds. Assumption (3.3). It is an immediate consequence of the dispersive estimate and the translation invariance of the L p norms. Indeed, because H 1 (R) = H 1 (R), ifɛ>, there exists a C, compactly supported function ψ such that ψ ψ H 1 ɛ. (3.13)
8 8 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line But ψ L p, so by the dispersive estimate (.3) e it na τ xn ψ L p 1 t n 1 ( 1 p 1 p ) τ x n ψ L p = 1 t n 1 ( 1 p 1 p ) ψ L p as n. Therefore, for n big enough e itna τ xn ψ L p ɛ. To achieve the proof, note that e ita f verifies e ita f H 1 f H 1. (3.14) (3.15) Indeed, as V is positive and in L 1, by the Sobolev embedding H 1 (R) L we get f L ( + V) 1 f = L u + V u f H 1. So, as e ita commute with ( + V) 1 andisanisometryonl, e ita f H 1 e ita f L + ( + V) 1 e ita f L = e ita f L + e ita ( + V) 1 f L = f L + ( + V) 1 f L f H 1. Now, because of the Sobolev embedding H 1 L p we obtain using (3.13), (3.14) and(3.15), for n big enough e itna τ xn ψ L p e itna τ xn (ψ ψ) L p + e itna τ xn ψ L p e it na τ xn (ψ ψ) H 1 + e it na τ xn ψ L p ψ ψ H 1 + e it na τ xn ψ L p ɛ which achieves the proof of (3.3). Assumption (3.4). We will show that t n t, x n ± τ xn e it n( +V) τ xn ψ e i t ψ H 1 and hence (3.4) will hold with ϕ = e i t ψ.asτ xn is an H 1 isometry and commute with e i t,itis sufficient to show that, if t n t and x n ±,wehave e it n( +V) τ xn ψ e i t τ xn ψ H 1.
9 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line 9 For example, if x n +. Let us first remark that, as τ xn commutes with e i t and e itn,isanh 1 isometry, and because e it ψ C(H 1 ) e i t τ xn ψ e itn τ xn ψ H 1 = e i t ψ e itn ψ H 1. Hence, decomposing e itn( +V) τ xn ψ e i t τ xn ψ = ( e itn( +V) τ xn ψ e itn τ xn ψ ) + ( e itn τ xn ψ e i t τ xn ψ ) we see that it is sufficient to show that e it n ( +V) τ xn ψ e itn τ xn ψ H 1. (3.16) Note that e it τ xn ψ e it( +V) τ xn ψ is a solution of the following linear Schrödinger equation with zero initial data i t u u + Vu= Ve it τ xn ψ. Therefore, by the inhomogenous Strichartz estimates, as (4, ) is admissible in dimension one, and because the translation operator commutes with e it,wehavefornlarge enough so that t n (, t + 1) e itn( +V) τ xn ψ e itn τ xn ψ L e it( +V) τ xn ψ e it τ xn ψ L (, t+1)l Ve it τ xn ψ L 4 3 (, t+1)l 1 = (τ xn V)e it ψ L 4 3 (, t+1)l 1 ( t + 1) 3 4 (τ xn V)e it ψ L. (, t+1)l 1 Hence, estimating in the same manner the gradient of these quantities, it is sufficient to obtain (3.16) to show that, as n goes to infinity (τ xn V)e it ψ L. (3.17) (, t+1)w 1,1 Let us fix ɛ>. e it ψ C([, t + 1],H 1 ) and the functions of H 1 (R) vanish at infinity, so, using the compacity in time, there exists Λ>suchthat e it ψ L ɛ. (, t+1)l ( x Λ) On the other hand, as V L 1, Λ can also be taken large enough so that V(x) dx ɛ. x Λ
10 3 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line Let n be large enough so that for all n n, x n Λ. Then, for n n x + x n Λ x Λ and for all t (, t + 1) and all n n we obtain (τ xn V)e it ψ L 1 = V( +x n )e it ψ + x+x n Λ ɛ e it ψ L (, t+1)l + ɛ V L 1 C( t,ψ,v)ɛ x+x n Λ V( +x n )e it ψ thus (τ xn V)e it ψ L (, t+1)l 1. With the same argument, because V L 1, we can show that (τ xn V) e it ψ L (, t+1)l1. To obtain (3.17), it only remain to show that τ xn V ( e it ψ ) L. (, t+1)l 1 To this purpose, let ψ be a C, compactly supported function such that (recall that we are in dimension one) ψ ψ H 1 ɛ. We have, by the Cauchy Schwarz inequality τ xn V ( e it ψ ) L 1 τ xn V ( e it ψ ) L 1 + τ xn V ( e it (ψ ψ) ) L 1 τ xn V ( e it ψ ) L 1 + V L ( e it (ψ ψ) ) L τ xn V ( e it ψ ) L 1 + ɛ V L, where V L because of the Sobolev embedding W 1,1 (R) L (R). Then, as (e it ψ) H 1, τ xn V(e it ψ) L (, t+1)l 1 can be estimated as (τ x n V)e it ψ L (, t+1)l1,so(3.17) holds and the proof of (3.4) is completed. Assumption (3.5). We decompose e it na τ xn ψ e i ta τ x ψ = ( e it na τ xn ψ e it na τ x ψ ) + ( e it na τ x ψ e i ta τ x ψ ). On the one hand, using the estimate (3.15) e it na τ xn ψ e it na τ x ψ H 1 τ xn ψ τ x ψ H 1 by the Lebesgue s dominated convergence theorem. On the other hand, e it n A τ x ψ e i ta τ x ψ H 1 because e i A τ x ψ C(H 1 ), and the last assumption is verified.
11 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line Non linear profiles In this section, we will see that for a data which escapes to infinity, the solutions of (1.1)and(1.)are the same, in the sense given by the three following Propositions. Propositions 7, 8 and 9 are the analogous of Propositions 3.4 and 3.6 of [1]. The non linear Schrödinger equation with a Dirac potential is more singular, but it allows the use of explicit formulas that are not available in the present more general framework. Proposition 7. Let ψ H 1, (x n ) n 1 R N be such that x n. Then, up to a subsequence e it τ xn ψ e it( V) τ xn ψ L (4.1) p L r as n. Proof. Up to a subsequence, we can assume that x n + or x n. Let us assume for example x n +. As a first step, we will show that supe it( +V) τ xn ψ L (4.) n N p (T, )L r as T.Pickɛ>. There exists a C, compactly supported function ψ such that ψ ψ H 1 ɛ. By Strichartz estimates e it( +V) (τ xn ψ τ xn ψ) L τ p L r xn ψ τ xn ψ H 1 = ψ ψ H 1 ɛ. On the other hand, as τ xn ψ L r the dispersive estimate (.3) givesus e it( +V) τ xn ψ L r 1 t τ 1 ( 1 r 1 r ) x n ψ L r = 1 t ψ 1 (1 r ) L r but p (1 r ) = α α+4 > 1andt 1 t 1 (1 r ) supe it( +V) τ xn ψ L ɛ. n N p ( t T)L r L q (1, ). So, there exists T> such that Taking τ xn ψ = τ xn ψ + (τ xn ψ τ xn ψ), we then obtain for T>large enough supe it( +V) τ xn ψ L ɛ n N p ( t T)L r and (4.) holds.
12 3 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line To obtain (4.1), we are now reduced to show that for T>fixed e it τ xn ψ e it( +V) τ xn ψ L p (,T )L r as n.letɛ>. e it τ xn ψ e it( +V) τ xn ψ is a solution of the following linear Schrödinger equation with zero initial data i t u u + Vu= Ve it τ xn ψ. So, by the inhomogenous Strichartz estimate (.9) e it τ xn ψ e it( +V) τ xn ψ p L t (,T )L Ve it τ r xn ψ L γ t (,T )L 1 T 1 γ Ve it τ xn ψ L (,T )L 1 = T 1 γ (τ xn V)e it ψ L (,T )L 1 because the translation operator τ xn commutes with the propagator e it.but (τ xn V)e it ψ L (,T )L 1 as seen in the proof of Proposition 6, point (3.4). Proposition 8. Let ψ H 1, (x n ) n 1 R N be such that x n, U C(H 1 ) L p L r be the unique solution to (1.) with initial data ψ, and U n (t, x) := U(t,x x n ). Then, up to a subsequence t e i(t s) ( U n U n α) t (s) ds e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) (s) ds (4.3) L p L r as n. Proof. We follow the same spirit of proof as for Proposition 7. We begin to show that t sup e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) (s) ds (4.4) L p ([T, ))L r n N as T goes to infinity. We decompose t e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) (s) ds L p ([T, ))L r T t + e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) (s) ds T e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) (s) ds L p ([T, ))L r L p ([T, ))L r
13 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line 33 where, by the inhomogenous Strichartz estimates t e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) (s) ds U n U n α L q = U U α ([T, )L r ) L q ([T, )L r ) L p ([T, )L r ) T and, by the Hölder inequality U U α L q ([T, )L r U α+1 ) L p ([T, )L r ) T independently of n. On the other hand, by the dispersive estimate (.3) T e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) (s) ds L p [T, )L r T ( e i(t s)( V) U n U n α) (s) L r ds T T = R L p ([T, )) (t s) 1 (1 r ) ( U n U n α) (s) L r ds L p ([T, )) (t s) 1 (1 r ) ( U U α) (s) L r ds L p ([T, )) t s 1 (1 r ) ( U U α) (s) L r ds L p ([T, )) as T goes to infinity. Indeed, note that by the Hardy Littlewood Sobolev inequality t s 1 (1 ) r ( U U α) (s) L L r ds U U α L q L r U α+1 L p L r < p R so (4.4) holds. The same estimate is obviously valid for the propagator e it. It remains to show that for T>fixed, t e i(t s) ( U n U n α) t ds e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) ds L p (,T )L r as n. The difference t e i(t s) ( U n U n α) ds t e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) ds is the solution of the following linear Schrödinger equation, with zero initial data i t u u + Vu= V t e i(t s) ( U n U n α) ds.
14 34 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line As a consequence, by the Strichartz estimate (.9) t e i(t s) ( U n U n α) t ds e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) ds t V e i(t s) ( U n U n α) ds L γ (,T )L 1 T 1 t γ (τ xn V) e i(t s) ( U U α) ds. L (,T )L 1 L p (,T )L r But t e i(t s) (U U α )ds C([,T],H 1 ) and the functions of H 1 (R) vanish at infinity, so there exists Λ>such that t e i(t s) ( U U α) ds ɛ L (,T )L ( x Λ) so (τ x n V) t e i(t s) ( U U α) ds L (,T )L 1 in the same way as in the proof of Proposition 6, point (3.4). Proposition 9. Let ψ H 1, (x n ) n 1, (t n ) n 1 R N be such that x n and t n ±, U be a solution to (1.) such that U(t) e it ψ H 1 t ± and U n (t, x) := U(t t n,x x n ). Then, up to a subsequence e i(t tn) τ xn ψ e i(t tn)( V) τ xn ψ L (4.5) p L r and t e i(t s) ( U n U n α) t ds e i(t s)( V)( U n U n α) ds (4.6) L p L r as n. Proof. The proof is the same as for Proposition 7 and Proposition 8, decomposing the time interval in { t t n >T} and its complementary. Finally, we will need the following Proposition of non linear scattering:
15 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line 35 Proposition 1. Let ϕ H 1. Then there exists W ± C(H 1 ) L p R ± L r, solution of (1.1) such that W± (t, ) e it( V) ϕ H 1 moreover, if t n and (4.7) t ± ϕ n = e it n( V) ϕ, W ±,n (t) = W ± (t t n ) (4.8) then t W ±,n (t) = e it( V) ϕ n + e i(t s)( V)( W ±,n W ±,n α) (s) ds + f ±,n (t) (4.9) where f ±,n L p R ± Lr. (4.1) Proof. The same proof as [1], Proposition 3.5, holds, as it involves only the analogous Strichartz estimates. 5. Construction of a critical element We have now all the tools to extract a critical element following the approach of [5]. Let E c = sup { E> ϕ H 1,E(ϕ)<E the solution of (1.1) with data ϕ is in L p L r}. We will suppose that the critical energy E c is finite, and deduce the existence of a solution of (1.1) with a relatively compact flow in H 1. Proposition 11. If E c <, then there exists ϕ c H 1, ϕ c, such that the corresponding solution u c of (1.1) verifies that {u c (t), t } is relatively compact in H 1. Proof. Because of Proposition 4, E c >. Therefore, if E c <, there exists a sequence ϕ n of non-zero elements of H 1, such that, if we denote by u n C(H 1 ) the corresponding solution of (1.1), we have and E(ϕ n ) E c u n / L q L r. Thanks to the Proposition 6, we can apply the abstract profile decomposition of [1] totheh 1 -bounded sequence ϕ n and the operator A = + V. Up to a subsequence, ϕ n writes, for all J N: ϕ n = J e itn j ( +V) τ x n j ψ j + Rn J, j=1
16 36 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line where t n j, xn j, ψ j, R J n verifies (3.6) (3.1). From (3.11) and(3.1), we have E c lim sup J E ( e itn j ( +V) ) τ x n j ψ j. j=1 We show that there is exactly one non trivial profile, that is J = 1. By contradiction, assume that J>1. To each profile ψ j we associate family of non linear profiles (U j,n ) n.letj {1,...,J}. Wearein exactly one of the following situations: (1) If (tj n,xn j ) = (, ). By the orthogonality condition, notice that this can happen only for one profile. Because J > 1, we have E(ψ j )<E c, so the solution of (1.1) with data ψ j scatters. If this case happens, let N C(H 1 ) L p L r be this solution, otherwise, we set N =. () If tj n = and xn j.letu j C(H 1 ) L p L r be the unique solution to (1.) with initial data ψ j.wesetu n,j (x, t) := U(x xj n,t). (3) If xj n = andt j n ±. By Proposition 1, there exists U j C R± (H 1 ) L p R ± L r a solution to (1.1) such that U j (t) e it( V) ψ j H 1 t ± and verifying (4.7), (4.8), (4.9), (4.1). We have E(U j ) = lim E( e itn j ( +V) τ x n j ψ j ) <Ec so U j L q L r.wesetu j,n (t, x) := U j (t t n j,x). (4) If x n j and t n j ±.LetU j C(H 1 ) L p L r be a solution to (1.) such that U j (t) e it ψ j H 1. t ± We set U j,n (t, x) := U j (t tj n,x xn j ). Now, let Z n,j := N + j U n,j. By the results of the non linear profiles section Propositions 7 and 8 in situation (), Proposition 9 in situation (3) and Proposition 1 in situation (4), we have t Z n,j = e it( V) (ϕ n R n,j ) + + j t e i(t s)( V)( N N α) (s) ds e i(t s)( V)( U j,n U j,n α) (s) ds + r n,j (5.1)
17 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line 37 with r n,j L p L r as n. The decomposition (5.1) is the same as obtained in the proof of Proposition 4.1 of [1], and we therefore obtain the critical element following their proof, using our perturbative result of Proposition 5 instead of their Proposition 3.3, and the Strichartz inequalities of our Proposition instead of estimates (3.1), (3.), (3.3), (3.4) of their paper. 6. Rigidity In this section, we will show that the critical solution constructed in the previous one assuming the fact that E c < cannot exist. We will need the following classical result concerning the compact families of H 1 Proposition 1. Suppose that {u(t), t } is relatively compact in H 1. Then, for any ɛ >, there exists R>such that ( sup u(t, x) + u(t, x) + u(t, x) α+ ) dx ɛ. t x R Proof. Classic, see e.g. [5]. Now, we can show the rigidity Proposition needed to end the proof: Proposition 13. Suppose that u C(H 1 ) is a solution of (1.1) such that {u(t), t } is relatively compact in H 1.Thenu =. Proof. By a classical elementary computation, we get the following virial identities: Lemma 1. Let u C(H 1 ) be a solution to (1.1) and χ be a compactly supported, regular function. Then t χ u = Im χ u ū (6.1) t χ u = 4 χ u + α α + χ u α+ χ V u χ (4) u. (6.) Now, we assume by contradiction that u. Let χ Cc χ(x) = for x, set χ R := R χ( R ) and z R (t) = χ R u(t) be such that χ(x) = x for x 1and
18 38 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line we have, by (6.1), the Cauchy Schwarz inequality and the conservation of energy z R (t) χ R u ū CE(u) 1 M(u) 1 R. (6.3) Moreover, by (6.) z R (t) = 4 8 χ R x R u + α χ R α + u α+ χ R V u χ (4) R u u + 4α ( u α+ C u + u α+ + u ) α + x R x >R χ R V u χ (4) u (6.4) but, because of conservation of the mass χ (4) u C u() L R (6.5) and, because V is repulsive (i.e. xv ), using the Cauchy Schwarz inequality, the Sobolev injection H 1 L and the conservation laws χ R V u = xv u + χ R V u C x R x >R x >R xv u C xv L 1 ( x >R) u L C xv L 1 ( x >R) u H 1 C ( u() ) xv L 1 ( x >R). (6.6) Let R be large enough so that u α+ 1 u α+ := δ. (6.7) x R We have δ>because we suppose that u is non zero. For R R, we obtain combining (6.4) with (6.5), (6.6), and (6.7) z R (δ (t) C ( u + u α+ + u ) 1 u() L x >R R ) xv L. (6.8) 1 ( x >R) Because xv L 1 and using the compacity hypothesis combined with Proposition 1, there exists R R large enough so that ( u + u α+ + u ) 1 + u() R L + xv δ L 1 ( x >R) x >R
19 D. Lafontaine / Scattering for NLS with a potential on the line 39 then, (6.8) gives z R Cδ (t) >. Integrating this last inequality contradicts (6.3) ast. We are now in position to end the proof of Theorem 1: Proof of Theorem 1. If E c <, then the Proposition 11 allows us to extract a critical element ϕ c H 1, ϕ c, such that the corresponding solution u c of (1.1) verifies that {u c (t), t } is relatively compact in H 1. By Proposition 13, such a critical solution cannot exist, so E c = and by Proposition 3, all the solutions of (1.1) scatter in H 1. Acknowledgements The author thanks N. Visciglia for having submitted him this problem, enlighting discussions and his warm welcome in Pisa, J. Zheng for his helpfull comments, his Ph.D. advisor F. Planchon for his disponibility and advices, and the referee for his careful reading and his constructive criticism. References [1] V. Banica and N. Visciglia, Scattering for NLS with a delta potential, J. Differential Equations 6(5) (16), doi:1.116/j.jde [] J. Colliander, M. Grillakis and N. Tzirakis, Tensor products and correlation estimates with applications to nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 6(7) (9), doi:1.1/cpa.78. [3] T. Duyckaerts, J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, Scattering for the non-radial 3D cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Math. Res. Lett. 15(6) (8), doi:1.431/mrl.8.v15.n6.a13. [4] L. Fanelli and N. Visciglia, The lack of compactness in the Sobolev Strichartz inequalities, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 99(3) (13), doi:1.116/j.matpur [5] D. Fang, J. Xie and T. Cazenave, Scattering for the focusing energy-subcritical nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Sci. China Math. 54(1) (11), doi:1.17/s [6] D. Foschi, Inhomogeneous Strichartz estimates, J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. (1) (5), 1 4. doi:1.114/ S [7] M. Goldberg and W. Schlag, Dispersive estimates for Schrödinger operators in dimensions one and three, Comm. Math. Phys. 51(1) (4), doi:1.17/s [8] J. Holmer and S. Roudenko, A sharp condition for scattering of the radial 3D cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Comm. Math. Phys. 8() (8), doi:1.17/s-8-59-y. [9] Y. Hong, Scattering for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a potential, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 15 (16), , doi:1.3934/cpaa.163. [1] M. Keel and T. Tao, Endpoint Strichartz estimates, Amer.J.Math.1(5) (1998), , available at: edu/journals/american_journal_of_mathematics/v1/1.5keel.pdf. doi:1.1353/ajm [11] C.E. Kenig and F. Merle, Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy-critical, focusing, non-linear Schrödinger equation in the radial case, Invent. Math. 166(3) (6), doi:1.17/s [1] K. Nakanishi, Energy scattering for nonlinear Klein Gordon and Schrödinger equations in spatial dimensions 1 and, J. Funct. Anal. 169(1) (1999), 1 5. doi:1.16/jfan [13] F. Planchon and L. Vega, Bilinear virial identities and applications, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 4() (9), [14] N. Visciglia, On the decay of solutions to a class of defocusing NLS, Math. Res. Lett. 16(5) (9), doi:1.431/ MRL.9.v16.n5.a14.
SCATTERING FOR THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL NLS WITH EXPONENTIAL NONLINEARITY
SCATTERING FOR THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL NLS WITH EXPONENTIAL NONLINEARITY S. IBRAHIM, M. MAJDOUB, N. MASMOUDI, AND K. NAKANISHI Abstract. We investigate existence and asymptotic completeness of the wave operators
More informationBLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED
BLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED TAOUFIK HMIDI AND SAHBI KERAANI Abstract. In this note we prove a refined version of compactness lemma adapted to the blowup analysis
More informationSCATTERING FOR THE NON-RADIAL 3D CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
SCATTERING FOR THE NON-RADIAL 3D CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION THOMAS DUYCKAERTS, JUSTIN HOLMER, AND SVETLANA ROUDENKO Abstract. Scattering of radial H 1 solutions to the 3D focusing cubic nonlinear
More informationM ath. Res. Lett. 15 (2008), no. 6, c International Press 2008 SCATTERING FOR THE NON-RADIAL 3D CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
M ath. Res. Lett. 15 (2008), no. 6, 1233 1250 c International Press 2008 SCATTERING FOR THE NON-RADIAL 3D CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION Thomas Duyckaerts, Justin Holmer, and Svetlana Roudenko Abstract.
More informationScattering theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with inverse square potential
Scattering theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equation with inverse square potential Université Nice Sophia-Antipolis Based on joint work with: Changxing Miao (IAPCM) and Junyong Zhang (BIT) February -6,
More informationScattering for cubic-quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation on R 3
Scattering for cubic-quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation on R 3 Oana Pocovnicu Princeton University March 9th 2013 Joint work with R. Killip (UCLA), T. Oh (Princeton), M. Vişan (UCLA) SCAPDE UCLA 1
More informationRecent developments on the global behavior to critical nonlinear dispersive equations. Carlos E. Kenig
Recent developments on the global behavior to critical nonlinear dispersive equations Carlos E. Kenig In the last 25 years or so, there has been considerable interest in the study of non-linear partial
More informationGlobal well-posedness for semi-linear Wave and Schrödinger equations. Slim Ibrahim
Global well-posedness for semi-linear Wave and Schrödinger equations Slim Ibrahim McMaster University, Hamilton ON University of Calgary, April 27th, 2006 1 1 Introduction Nonlinear Wave equation: ( 2
More informationDISPERSIVE EQUATIONS: A SURVEY
DISPERSIVE EQUATIONS: A SURVEY GIGLIOLA STAFFILANI 1. Introduction These notes were written as a guideline for a short talk; hence, the references and the statements of the theorems are often not given
More informationDETERMINATION OF THE BLOW-UP RATE FOR THE SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION
DETERMINATION OF THE LOW-UP RATE FOR THE SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION y FRANK MERLE and HATEM ZAAG Abstract. In this paper, we find the optimal blow-up rate for the semilinear wave equation with a power nonlinearity.
More informationLong-term dynamics of nonlinear wave equations
Long-term dynamics of nonlinear wave equations W. Schlag (University of Chicago) Recent Developments & Future Directions, September 2014 Wave maps Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold, and u : R 1+d t,x
More informationSharp blow-up criteria for the Davey-Stewartson system in R 3
Dynamics of PDE, Vol.8, No., 9-60, 011 Sharp blow-up criteria for the Davey-Stewartson system in R Jian Zhang Shihui Zhu Communicated by Y. Charles Li, received October 7, 010. Abstract. In this paper,
More informationSharp Sobolev Strichartz estimates for the free Schrödinger propagator
Sharp Sobolev Strichartz estimates for the free Schrödinger propagator Neal Bez, Chris Jeavons and Nikolaos Pattakos Abstract. We consider gaussian extremisability of sharp linear Sobolev Strichartz estimates
More informationGlobal solutions for the cubic non linear wave equation
Global solutions for the cubic non linear wave equation Nicolas Burq Université Paris-Sud, Laboratoire de Mathématiques d Orsay, CNRS, UMR 8628, FRANCE and Ecole Normale Supérieure Oxford sept 12th, 2012
More informationEndpoint Strichartz estimates for the magnetic Schrödinger equation
Journal of Functional Analysis 58 (010) 37 340 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfa Endpoint Strichartz estimates for the magnetic Schrödinger equation Piero D Ancona a, Luca Fanelli b,,luisvega b, Nicola Visciglia
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.ap] 8 Jun 2006
LOW REGULARITY GLOBAL WELL-POSEDNESS FOR THE KLEIN-GORDON-SCHRÖDINGER SYSTEM WITH THE HIGHER ORDER YUKAWA COUPLING arxiv:math/0606079v [math.ap] 8 Jun 006 Changxing Miao Institute of Applied Physics and
More informationANALYTIC SMOOTHING EFFECT FOR NONLI TitleSCHRÖDINGER EQUATION IN TWO SPACE DIMENSIONS. Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics.
ANALYTIC SMOOTHING EFFECT FOR NONLI TitleSCHRÖDINGER EQUATION IN TWO SPACE DIMENSIONS Author(s) Hoshino, Gaku; Ozawa, Tohru Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 51(3) Issue 014-07 Date Text Version publisher
More informationCUTOFF RESOLVENT ESTIMATES AND THE SEMILINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
CUTOFF RESOLVENT ESTIMATES AND THE SEMILINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION HANS CHRISTIANSON Abstract. This paper shows how abstract resolvent estimates imply local smoothing for solutions to the Schrödinger equation.
More informationNUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE ENERGY-SUPERCRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
Journal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations Vol. 7, No. 2 (2010) 279 296 c World Scientific Publishing Company DOI: 10.1142/S0219891610002104 NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF THE ENERGY-SUPERCRITICAL NONLINEAR
More informationOn the Cauchy problem of 3-D energy-critical Schrödinger equations with subcritical perturbations
J. Differential Equations 30 (006 4 445 www.elsevier.com/locate/jde On the Cauchy problem of 3-D energy-critical Schrödinger equations with subcritical perturbations Xiaoyi Zhang Academy of Mathematics
More informationScattering for the NLS equation
Scattering for the NLS equation joint work with Thierry Cazenave (UPMC) Ivan Naumkin Université Nice Sophia Antipolis February 2, 2017 Introduction. Consider the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with the
More information1-D cubic NLS with several Diracs as initial data and consequences
1-D cubic NLS with several Diracs as initial data and consequences Valeria Banica (Univ. Pierre et Marie Curie) joint work with Luis Vega (BCAM) Roma, September 2017 1/20 Plan of the talk The 1-D cubic
More informationDynamics of energy-critical wave equation
Dynamics of energy-critical wave equation Carlos Kenig Thomas Duyckaerts Franke Merle September 21th, 2014 Duyckaerts Kenig Merle Critical wave 2014 1 / 22 Plan 1 Introduction Duyckaerts Kenig Merle Critical
More informationThe NLS on product spaces and applications
October 2014, Orsay The NLS on product spaces and applications Nikolay Tzvetkov Cergy-Pontoise University based on joint work with Zaher Hani, Benoit Pausader and Nicola Visciglia A basic result Consider
More informationA REMARK ON AN EQUATION OF WAVE MAPS TYPE WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS
A REMARK ON AN EQUATION OF WAVE MAPS TYPE WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS DAN-ANDREI GEBA Abstract. We obtain a sharp local well-posedness result for an equation of wave maps type with variable coefficients.
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ap] 28 Oct 2005
arxiv:math/050643v [math.ap] 28 Oct 2005 A remark on asymptotic completeness for the critical nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation Hans Lindblad and Avy Soffer University of California at San Diego and Rutgers
More informationTADAHIRO OH 0, 3 8 (T R), (1.5) The result in [2] is in fact stated for time-periodic functions: 0, 1 3 (T 2 ). (1.4)
PERIODIC L 4 -STRICHARTZ ESTIMATE FOR KDV TADAHIRO OH 1. Introduction In [], Bourgain proved global well-posedness of the periodic KdV in L T): u t + u xxx + uu x 0, x, t) T R. 1.1) The key ingredient
More informationSolutions to the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation in Hyperbolic Space
Solutions to the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation in Hyperbolic Space SPUR Final Paper, Summer 2014 Peter Kleinhenz Mentor: Chenjie Fan Project suggested by Gigliola Staffilani July 30th, 2014 Abstract In
More informationA GLOBAL COMPACT ATTRACTOR FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DEFOCUSING NON-LINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS WITH POTENTIAL TERENCE TAO
A GLOBAL COMPACT ATTRACTOR FOR HIGH-DIMENSIONAL DEFOCUSING NON-LINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS WITH POTENTIAL TERENCE TAO arxiv:85.1544v2 [math.ap] 28 May 28 Abstract. We study the asymptotic behavior of
More informationNonlinear Schrödinger Equation BAOXIANG WANG. Talk at Tsinghua University 2012,3,16. School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University.
Talk at Tsinghua University 2012,3,16 Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation BAOXIANG WANG School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University 1 1 33 1. Schrödinger E. Schrödinger (1887-1961) E. Schrödinger, (1887,
More informationMultisolitons for NLS
Multisolitons for NLS Stefan LE COZ Beijing 2007-07-03 Plan 1 Introduction 2 Existence of multi-solitons 3 (In)stability NLS (NLS) { iut + u + g( u 2 )u = 0 u t=0 = u 0 u : R t R d x C (A0) (regular) g
More informationLECTURE NOTES : INTRODUCTION TO DISPERSIVE PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
LECTURE NOTES : INTRODUCTION TO DISPERSIVE PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS NIKOLAOS TZIRAKIS Abstract. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a short and accessible introduction to the modern theory of
More informationSome physical space heuristics for Strichartz estimates
Some physical space heuristics for Strichartz estimates Felipe Hernandez July 30, 2014 SPUR Final Paper, Summer 2014 Mentor Chenjie Fan Project suggested by Gigliola Staffilani Abstract This note records
More informationA COUNTEREXAMPLE TO AN ENDPOINT BILINEAR STRICHARTZ INEQUALITY TERENCE TAO. t L x (R R2 ) f L 2 x (R2 )
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2006(2006), No. 5, pp. 6. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) A COUNTEREXAMPLE
More informationOn the role of geometry in scattering theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equations
On the role of geometry in scattering theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equations Rémi Carles (CNRS & Université Montpellier 2) Orléans, April 9, 2008 Free Schrödinger equation on R n : i t u + 1 2 u =
More informationGlobal well-posedness for KdV in Sobolev spaces of negative index
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. (), No. 6, pp. 7. ISSN: 7-669. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) Global well-posedness for
More informationBlow-up on manifolds with symmetry for the nonlinear Schröding
Blow-up on manifolds with symmetry for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation March, 27 2013 Université de Nice Euclidean L 2 -critical theory Consider the one dimensional equation i t u + u = u 4 u, t > 0,
More informationOPERATORS WITH SINGULAR CONTINUOUS SPECTRUM, V. SPARSE POTENTIALS. B. Simon 1 and G. Stolz 2
OPERATORS WITH SINGULAR CONTINUOUS SPECTRUM, V. SPARSE POTENTIALS B. Simon 1 and G. Stolz 2 Abstract. By presenting simple theorems for the absence of positive eigenvalues for certain one-dimensional Schrödinger
More informationSEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS WITH DEPENDENCE ON THE GRADIENT
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2012 (2012), No. 139, pp. 1 9. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC
More informationEnergy transfer model and large periodic boundary value problem for the quintic NLS
Energy transfer model and large periodic boundary value problem for the quintic NS Hideo Takaoka Department of Mathematics, Kobe University 1 ntroduction This note is based on a talk given at the conference
More informationInégalités de dispersion via le semi-groupe de la chaleur
Inégalités de dispersion via le semi-groupe de la chaleur Valentin Samoyeau, Advisor: Frédéric Bernicot. Laboratoire de Mathématiques Jean Leray, Université de Nantes January 28, 2016 1 Introduction Schrödinger
More informationA PHYSICAL SPACE PROOF OF THE BILINEAR STRICHARTZ AND LOCAL SMOOTHING ESTIMATES FOR THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
A PHYSICAL SPACE PROOF OF THE BILINEAR STRICHARTZ AND LOCAL SMOOTHING ESTIMATES FOR THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION TERENCE TAO Abstract. Let d 1, and let u, v : R R d C be Schwartz space solutions to the Schrödinger
More informationInvariant measures and the soliton resolution conjecture
Invariant measures and the soliton resolution conjecture Stanford University The focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation A complex-valued function u of two variables x and t, where x R d is the space variable
More informationPiecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation
Piecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation Alberto Bressan and Tianyou Zhang Department of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, Pa 68, USA e-mails: bressan@mathpsuedu, zhang
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ap] 4 Dec 2013
ON D NLS ON NON-TRAPPING EXTERIOR DOMAINS FARAH ABOU SHAKRA arxiv:04.768v [math.ap] 4 Dec 0 Abstract. Global existence and scattering for the nonlinear defocusing Schrödinger equation in dimensions are
More informationWell-Posedness and Adiabatic Limit for Quantum Zakharov System
Well-Posedness and Adiabatic Limit for Quantum Zakharov System Yung-Fu Fang (joint work with Tsai-Jung Chen, Jun-Ichi Segata, Hsi-Wei Shih, Kuan-Hsiang Wang, Tsung-fang Wu) Department of Mathematics National
More informationTwo dimensional exterior mixed problem for semilinear damped wave equations
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 31 (25) 366 377 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Two dimensional exterior mixed problem for semilinear damped wave equations Ryo Ikehata 1 Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of
More informationRANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER
RANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER. Quasilinear problems In general, one consider the following trichotomy for nonlinear PDEs: A semilinear problem is a problem where the highest-order terms appears linearly
More informationGlobal Well-Posedness for Energy Critical Fourth-Order Schrödinger Equations in the Radial Case
Dynamics of PDE, Vol.4, No.3, 197-5, 007 Global Well-Posedness for Energy Critical Fourth-Order Schrödinger Equations in the Radial Case Benoit Pausader Communicated by Terence Tao, received May 31, 007,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 16 Sep 2014
GOING BEYOND THE THRESHOLD: SCATTERING AND BLOW-UP IN THE FOCUSING NLS EQUATION THOMAS DUYCKAERTS AND SVETLANA ROUDENKO arxiv:09.8v [math.ap] 6 Sep 0 Abstract. We study the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger
More informationWell-posedness for the Fourth-order Schrödinger Equations with Quadratic Nonlinearity
Well-posedness for the Fourth-order Schrödinger Equations with Quadratic Nonlinearity Jiqiang Zheng The Graduate School of China Academy of Engineering Physics P. O. Box 20, Beijing, China, 00088 (zhengjiqiang@gmail.com)
More informationTHE THEORY OF NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS: PART I
THE THEORY OF NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS: PART I J. COLLIANDER, M. KEEL, G. STAFFILANI, H. TAKAOKA, AND T. TAO Contents 1. Introduction. Lecture # 1: The Linear Schrödinger Equation in R n : Dispersive
More informationPresenter: Noriyoshi Fukaya
Y. Martel, F. Merle, and T.-P. Tsai, Stability and Asymptotic Stability in the Energy Space of the Sum of N Solitons for Subcritical gkdv Equations, Comm. Math. Phys. 31 (00), 347-373. Presenter: Noriyoshi
More informationSELF-ADJOINTNESS OF DIRAC OPERATORS VIA HARDY-DIRAC INEQUALITIES
SELF-ADJOINTNESS OF DIRAC OPERATORS VIA HARDY-DIRAC INEQUALITIES MARIA J. ESTEBAN 1 AND MICHAEL LOSS Abstract. Distinguished selfadjoint extension of Dirac operators are constructed for a class of potentials
More informationGlobal well-posedness and scattering for the defocusing quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation in two dimensions
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 08 Global well-posedness and scattering for the defocusing quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation
More informationREMARKS ON THE VANISHING OBSTACLE LIMIT FOR A 3D VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID
REMARKS ON THE VANISHING OBSTACLE LIMIT FOR A 3D VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID DRAGOŞ IFTIMIE AND JAMES P. KELLIHER Abstract. In [Math. Ann. 336 (2006), 449-489] the authors consider the two dimensional
More informationOn non negative solutions of some quasilinear elliptic inequalities
On non negative solutions of some quasilinear elliptic inequalities Lorenzo D Ambrosio and Enzo Mitidieri September 28 2006 Abstract Let f : R R be a continuous function. We prove that under some additional
More informationBielefeld Course on Nonlinear Waves - June 29, Department of Mathematics University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Solitons on Manifolds
Joint work (on various projects) with Pierre Albin (UIUC), Hans Christianson (UNC), Jason Metcalfe (UNC), Michael Taylor (UNC), Laurent Thomann (Nantes) Department of Mathematics University of North Carolina,
More informationNONLINEAR PROPAGATION OF WAVE PACKETS. Ritsumeikan University, and 22
NONLINEAR PROPAGATION OF WAVE PACKETS CLOTILDE FERMANIAN KAMMERER Ritsumeikan University, 21-1 - 21 and 22 Our aim in this lecture is to explain the proof of a recent Theorem obtained in collaboration
More informationM. Ledoux Université de Toulouse, France
ON MANIFOLDS WITH NON-NEGATIVE RICCI CURVATURE AND SOBOLEV INEQUALITIES M. Ledoux Université de Toulouse, France Abstract. Let M be a complete n-dimensional Riemanian manifold with non-negative Ricci curvature
More informationFrom the N-body problem to the cubic NLS equation
From the N-body problem to the cubic NLS equation François Golse Université Paris 7 & Laboratoire J.-L. Lions golse@math.jussieu.fr Los Alamos CNLS, January 26th, 2005 Formal derivation by N.N. Bogolyubov
More informationStability of an abstract wave equation with delay and a Kelvin Voigt damping
Stability of an abstract wave equation with delay and a Kelvin Voigt damping University of Monastir/UPSAY/LMV-UVSQ Joint work with Serge Nicaise and Cristina Pignotti Outline 1 Problem The idea Stability
More informationExistence of a ground state and blow-up problem for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with critical growth
Existence of a ground state and blow-up problem for a nonlinear Schrödinger equation with critical growth Takafumi Akahori, Slim Ibrahim, Hiroaki Kikuchi and Hayato Nawa 1 Introduction In this paper, we
More informationNONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER ELLIPTIC SYSTEMS INVOLVING EXPONENTIAL CRITICAL GROWTH IN R Introduction
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 014 (014), No. 59, pp. 1 1. ISSN: 107-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER
More informationAnalysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version
Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version Frank Pacard To cite this version: Frank Pacard. Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version. 3rd cycle. Téhéran (Iran, 2006, pp.75.
More informationBound-state solutions and well-posedness of the dispersion-managed nonlinear Schrödinger and related equations
Bound-state solutions and well-posedness of the dispersion-managed nonlinear Schrödinger and related equations J. Albert and E. Kahlil University of Oklahoma, Langston University 10th IMACS Conference,
More informationRemarks on Bronštein s root theorem
Remarks on Bronštein s root theorem Guy Métivier January 23, 2017 1 Introduction In [Br1], M.D.Bronštein proved that the roots of hyperbolic polynomials (1.1) p(t, τ) = τ m + m p k (t)τ m k. which depend
More informationThe Concentration-compactness/ Rigidity Method for Critical Dispersive and Wave Equations
The Concentration-compactness/ Rigidity Method for Critical Dispersive and Wave Equations Carlos E. Kenig Supported in part by NSF 3 In these lectures I will describe a program (which I will call the
More informationdoi: /j.jde
doi: 10.1016/j.jde.016.08.019 On Second Order Hyperbolic Equations with Coefficients Degenerating at Infinity and the Loss of Derivatives and Decays Tamotu Kinoshita Institute of Mathematics, University
More informationALMOST CONSERVATION LAWS AND GLOBAL ROUGH SOLUTIONS TO A NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
ALMOST CONSERVATION LAWS AND GLOBAL ROUGH SOLUTIONS TO A NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION J. COLLIANDER, M. KEEL, G. STAFFILANI, H. TAKAOKA, AND T. TAO Abstract. We prove an almost conservation law to obtain
More informationOn m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry
On m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry Ognjen Milatovic Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of North Florida Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA. Abstract
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 18 May 2017
Littlewood-Paley-Stein functions for Schrödinger operators arxiv:175.6794v1 [math.ap] 18 May 217 El Maati Ouhabaz Dedicated to the memory of Abdelghani Bellouquid (2/2/1966 8/31/215) Abstract We study
More informationGLOBAL EXISTENCE FOR THE ONE-DIMENSIONAL SEMILINEAR TRICOMI-TYPE EQUATIONS
GLOBAL EXISTENCE FOR THE ONE-DIMENSIONAL SEMILINEAR TRICOMI-TYPE EQUATIONS ANAHIT GALSTYAN The Tricomi equation u tt tu xx = 0 is a linear partial differential operator of mixed type. (For t > 0, the Tricomi
More informationSTOKES PROBLEM WITH SEVERAL TYPES OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN AN EXTERIOR DOMAIN
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2013 2013, No. 196, pp. 1 28. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu STOKES PROBLEM
More informationNONLINEAR DECAY AND SCATTERING OF SOLUTIONS TO A BRETHERTON EQUATION IN SEVERAL SPACE DIMENSIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 5(5), No. 4, pp. 7. ISSN: 7-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) NONLINEAR DECAY
More informationLow Regularity Uniqueness of Solutions to the Gross-Pitaevskii Hierarchy
Low Regularity Uniqueness of Solutions to the Gross-Pitaevskii Hierarchy Kenny Taliaferro (based on joint works with Y. Hong and Z. Xie) November 22, 2014 1 / 19 The Cubic Gross-Pitaevskii Hierarchy The
More informationAlmost sure global existence and scattering for the one-dimensional NLS
Almost sure global existence and scattering for the one-dimensional NLS Nicolas Burq 1 Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire de Mathématiques d Orsay, UMR 8628 du CNRS EPFL oct 20th
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 5 Nov 2018
STRONG CONTINUITY FOR THE 2D EULER EQUATIONS GIANLUCA CRIPPA, ELIZAVETA SEMENOVA, AND STEFANO SPIRITO arxiv:1811.01553v1 [math.ap] 5 Nov 2018 Abstract. We prove two results of strong continuity with respect
More informationEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS FOR KIRCHHOFF TYPE EQUATIONS WITH UNBOUNDED POTENTIAL. 1. Introduction In this article, we consider the Kirchhoff type problem
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 207 (207), No. 84, pp. 2. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS FOR KIRCHHOFF TYPE EQUATIONS
More informationMAXIMIZERS FOR THE STRICHARTZ AND THE SOBOLEV-STRICHARTZ INEQUALITIES FOR THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
Electronic Journal of Differential Euations, Vol. 9(9), No. 3, pp. 1 13. ISSN: 17-6691. UR: http://ede.math.tstate.edu or http://ede.math.unt.edu ftp ede.math.tstate.edu (login: ftp) MAXIMIZERS FOR THE
More informationHeat equations with singular potentials: Hardy & Carleman inequalities, well-posedness & control
Outline Heat equations with singular potentials: Hardy & Carleman inequalities, well-posedness & control IMDEA-Matemáticas & Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Spain enrique.zuazua@uam.es Analysis and control
More informationNew York Journal of Mathematics
New York Journal of Mathematics New York J. Math. 11 (2005) 57 80. Global well-posedness and scattering for the higher-dimensional energy-critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation for radial data Terence
More informationHARDY INEQUALITIES WITH BOUNDARY TERMS. x 2 dx u 2 dx. (1.2) u 2 = u 2 dx.
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 003(003), No. 3, pp. 1 8. ISSN: 107-6691. UL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) HADY INEQUALITIES
More informationNULL CONDITION FOR SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS. Fabio Catalano
Serdica Math J 25 (999), 32-34 NULL CONDITION FOR SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS Fabio Catalano Communicated by V Petkov Abstract In this work we analyse the nonlinear Cauchy problem
More informationON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM
ON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM OLEG ZUBELEVICH DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS THE BUDGET AND TREASURY ACADEMY OF THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 7, ZLATOUSTINSKY MALIY PER.,
More informationNecessary Conditions and Sufficient Conditions for Global Existence in the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation
Necessary Conditions and Sufficient Conditions for Global Existence in the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation Pascal Bégout aboratoire Jacques-ouis ions Université Pierre et Marie Curie Boîte Courrier 187,
More informationOn the relation between scaling properties of functionals and existence of constrained minimizers
On the relation between scaling properties of functionals and existence of constrained minimizers Jacopo Bellazzini Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata U. Dini Università di Pisa January 11, 2011 J. Bellazzini
More informationDispersive Equations and Hyperbolic Orbits
Dispersive Equations and Hyperbolic Orbits H. Christianson Department of Mathematics University of California, Berkeley 4/16/07 The Johns Hopkins University Outline 1 Introduction 3 Applications 2 Main
More informationLocal smoothing and Strichartz estimates for manifolds with degenerate hyperbolic trapping
Local smoothing and Strichartz estimates for manifolds with degenerate hyperbolic trapping H. Christianson partly joint work with J. Wunsch (Northwestern) Department of Mathematics University of North
More informationEuler Equations: local existence
Euler Equations: local existence Mat 529, Lesson 2. 1 Active scalars formulation We start with a lemma. Lemma 1. Assume that w is a magnetization variable, i.e. t w + u w + ( u) w = 0. If u = Pw then u
More informationExistence of minimizers for the pure displacement problem in nonlinear elasticity
Existence of minimizers for the pure displacement problem in nonlinear elasticity Cristinel Mardare Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, Paris, F-75005 France Abstract
More informationInternal Stabilizability of Some Diffusive Models
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 265, 91 12 (22) doi:1.16/jmaa.21.7694, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Internal Stabilizability of Some Diffusive Models Bedr Eddine
More informationTHE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n
THE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n BAISHENG YAN Abstract. We present an elementary L 2 -Hodge theory on whole R n based on the minimization principle of the calculus of variations and some
More informationhal , version 1-22 Nov 2009
Author manuscript, published in "Kinet. Relat. Models 1, 3 8) 355-368" PROPAGATION OF GEVREY REGULARITY FOR SOLUTIONS OF LANDAU EQUATIONS HUA CHEN, WEI-XI LI AND CHAO-JIANG XU Abstract. By using the energy-type
More informationBIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES
BIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES SEBASTIAN HERR, TOBIAS LAMM, AND ROLAND SCHNAUBELT Abstract. A global weak solution of the biharmonic wave map equation in the energy space for spherical targets is constructed.
More informationPartial Differential Equations
Part II Partial Differential Equations Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2015 Paper 4, Section II 29E Partial Differential Equations 72 (a) Show that the Cauchy problem for u(x,
More informationNotes. 1 Fourier transform and L p spaces. March 9, For a function in f L 1 (R n ) define the Fourier transform. ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e 2πi x,ξ dx.
Notes March 9, 27 1 Fourier transform and L p spaces For a function in f L 1 (R n ) define the Fourier transform ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e 2πi x,ξ dx. Properties R n 1. f g = ˆfĝ 2. δλ (f)(ξ) = ˆf(λξ), where δ λ f(x)
More informationNon-degeneracy of perturbed solutions of semilinear partial differential equations
Non-degeneracy of perturbed solutions of semilinear partial differential equations Robert Magnus, Olivier Moschetta Abstract The equation u + F(V (εx, u = 0 is considered in R n. For small ε > 0 it is
More informationMath The Laplacian. 1 Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution
Math. 209 The Laplacian Green s Identities, Fundamental Solution Let be a bounded open set in R n, n 2, with smooth boundary. The fact that the boundary is smooth means that at each point x the external
More informationGlobal Solutions for a Nonlinear Wave Equation with the p-laplacian Operator
Global Solutions for a Nonlinear Wave Equation with the p-laplacian Operator Hongjun Gao Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics 188 Beijing, China To Fu Ma Departamento de Matemática
More information