Undefinability of standard sequent calculi for Paraconsistent logics
|
|
- Harold Jordan
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Undefinability of standard sequent calculi for Paraconsistent logics Michele Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) University of Padua Topology, Algebra and Categories in Logic. Prague, June 6, 07 M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 /
2 Outline Kleene Logics The starting point: PWK 3 Deductive calculi for paraconsistent Kleene logics 4 Our results M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 /
3 Kleene tables Strong Kleene tables: M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 3 /
4 Kleene tables Strong Kleene tables: Weak Kleene tables: M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 3 /
5 Kleene s family M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 4 /
6 Kleene s family Strong Kleene logic: SK, {} M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 4 /
7 Kleene s family Strong Kleene logic: SK, {} The Logic of Paradox, LP: SK, {, } M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 4 /
8 Kleene s family Strong Kleene logic: SK, {} The Logic of Paradox, LP: SK, {, } Bochvar s logic: WK, {} M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 4 /
9 Kleene s family Strong Kleene logic: SK, {} The Logic of Paradox, LP: SK, {, } Bochvar s logic: WK, {} Paraconsistent Weak Kleene logic, PWK: WK, {, } M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 4 /
10 Paraconsistent Week Kleene The language:,,, 0, M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 5 /
11 Paraconsistent Week Kleene The language:,,, 0, The algebra WK M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 5 /
12 Paraconsistent Week Kleene The language:,,, 0, The algebra WK The matrix: PWK = WK, {, /} 0 0 M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 5 /
13 Paraconsistent Week Kleene The language:,,, 0, The algebra WK The matrix: PWK = WK, {, /} 0 0 Γ PWK α for every v, v[γ] {, /} v(α) {, /} M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 5 /
14 A closer look to WK WK = {0,, },,,, 0, 0 0 M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 6 /
15 A closer look to WK WK = {0,, },,,, 0, a b a b = b 0 0 M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 6 /
16 A closer look to WK WK = {0,, },,,, 0, a b a b = b and a b a b = a 0 0 M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 6 /
17 A closer look to WK WK = {0,, },,,, 0, a b a b = b and a b a b = a a b b a 0 0 M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 6 /
18 A closer look to WK WK = {0,, },,,, 0, a b a b = b and a b a b = a 0 0 a b b a Counterexample to absorption: ( ) = M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 6 /
19 Involutive bisemilattices Definition An involutive bisemilattice is an algebra B = B,,,, 0, of type (,,,0,0), satisfying: M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 7 /
20 Involutive bisemilattices Definition An involutive bisemilattice is an algebra B = B,,,, 0, of type (,,,0,0), satisfying: I x x x; I x y y x; I3 x (y z) (x y) z; I7 0 x x; M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 7 /
21 Involutive bisemilattices Definition An involutive bisemilattice is an algebra B = B,,,, 0, of type (,,,0,0), satisfying: I x x x; I x y y x; I3 x (y z) (x y) z; I4 x x; I7 0 x x; I8 0. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 7 /
22 Involutive bisemilattices Definition An involutive bisemilattice is an algebra B = B,,,, 0, of type (,,,0,0), satisfying: I x x x; I x y y x; I3 x (y z) (x y) z; I4 x x; I5 x y ( x y); I7 0 x x; I8 0. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 7 /
23 Involutive bisemilattices Definition An involutive bisemilattice is an algebra B = B,,,, 0, of type (,,,0,0), satisfying: I x x x; I x y y x; I3 x (y z) (x y) z; I4 x x; I5 x y ( x y); I6 x ( x y) x y; I7 0 x x; I8 0. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 7 /
24 Involutive bisemilattices Definition An involutive bisemilattice is an algebra B = B,,,, 0, of type (,,,0,0), satisfying: I x x x; I x y y x; I3 x (y z) (x y) z; I4 x x; I5 x y ( x y); I6 x ( x y) x y; I7 0 x x; I8 0. Theorem V(WK) = IBSL. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 7 /
25 Algebraizability A formula-equation transformer is a map τ : Fm P(Fm ) (given by a set of equations in one variable). M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 8 /
26 Algebraizability A formula-equation transformer is a map τ : Fm P(Fm ) (given by a set of equations in one variable). An equation-formula transformer is a map ρ : Fm P(Fm) (given by a set of formulas in two variables). M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 8 /
27 Algebraizability A formula-equation transformer is a map τ : Fm P(Fm ) (given by a set of equations in one variable). An equation-formula transformer is a map ρ : Fm P(Fm) (given by a set of formulas in two variables). A class of algebras K is an algebraic semantics of a logic L if: Γ L α τ[γ] K τ(α). M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 8 /
28 Algebraizability A formula-equation transformer is a map τ : Fm P(Fm ) (given by a set of equations in one variable). An equation-formula transformer is a map ρ : Fm P(Fm) (given by a set of formulas in two variables). A class of algebras K is an algebraic semantics of a logic L if: Γ L α τ[γ] K τ(α). K is an equivalent algebraic semantics of L if moreover: α β K τ[ρ(α, β)]. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 8 /
29 Algebraizability A formula-equation transformer is a map τ : Fm P(Fm ) (given by a set of equations in one variable). An equation-formula transformer is a map ρ : Fm P(Fm) (given by a set of formulas in two variables). A class of algebras K is an algebraic semantics of a logic L if: Γ L α τ[γ] K τ(α). K is an equivalent algebraic semantics of L if moreover: α β K τ[ρ(α, β)]. L is algebraizable if it has an equivalent algebraic semantics. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 8 /
30 PWK, IBSL, and Algebraic Logic Theorem IBSL is not the equivalent algebraic semantics of any algebraizable logic L. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 9 /
31 PWK, IBSL, and Algebraic Logic Theorem IBSL is not the equivalent algebraic semantics of any algebraizable logic L. Theorem PWK is not protoalgebraic. Thus not algebraizable. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 9 /
32 PWK, IBSL, and Algebraic Logic Theorem IBSL is not the equivalent algebraic semantics of any algebraizable logic L. Theorem PWK is not protoalgebraic. Thus not algebraizable. Theorem PWK is not selfextensional, i.e. the interderivability relation L is not a congruence on Fm. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 9 /
33 Deductive calculi M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 0 /
34 Deductive calculi PWK: Hilbert style (Bonzio et al.), sequent calculi (Coniglio, Corbalan) M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 0 /
35 Deductive calculi PWK: Hilbert style (Bonzio et al.), sequent calculi (Coniglio, Corbalan) LP: Hilbert style (Font), sequent calculi (Avron, Beall) M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 0 /
36 Sequent calculus for PWK Axioms α α M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 /
37 Sequent calculus for PWK Axioms α α Structural rules Γ Γ, α LW Γ Γ α, Γ, α Γ, α Cut Γ RW M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 /
38 Sequent calculus for PWK Axioms Structural rules Γ Γ, α Operational rules LW α α Γ Γ α, Γ, α Γ, α Cut Γ Γ α, L Γ, α Γ, α Γ, β L Γ, α β Proviso for L : var(α) var( ) RW Γ, α R Γ α, Γ α, β, Γ α β, M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 / R
39 Sequent calculi for LP Avron (04). Axioms and structural rules as for PWK, logical rules including: Γ, α Γ, β L Γ, (α β) Γ, α L Γ, α M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 /
40 Our starting question Both LP and PWK have sequent calculi with some limitations on operational rules. Is it possible to give standard sequent calculi for LP and PWK? M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 3 /
41 Standard Sequent Calculi A standard Gentzen calculus for a logic L has the foll. 5 properties: Axioms: α α (α atomic). M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 4 /
42 Standard Sequent Calculi A standard Gentzen calculus for a logic L has the foll. 5 properties: Axioms: α α (α atomic). Premises (active) of logical rules with only subformulas of the conclusion; exactly one connective at time M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 4 /
43 Standard Sequent Calculi A standard Gentzen calculus for a logic L has the foll. 5 properties: Axioms: α α (α atomic). Premises (active) of logical rules with only subformulas of the conclusion; exactly one connective at time 3 No linguistic restrictions on rules M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 4 /
44 Standard Sequent Calculi A standard Gentzen calculus for a logic L has the foll. 5 properties: Axioms: α α (α atomic). Premises (active) of logical rules with only subformulas of the conclusion; exactly one connective at time 3 No linguistic restrictions on rules 4 Sequents are interpreted in the object language M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 4 /
45 Standard Sequent Calculi A standard Gentzen calculus for a logic L has the foll. 5 properties: Axioms: α α (α atomic). Premises (active) of logical rules with only subformulas of the conclusion; exactly one connective at time 3 No linguistic restrictions on rules 4 Sequents are interpreted in the object language 5 Only classical structural rules, i.e. contraction, weakening and cut are (possibly) allowed. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 4 /
46 IFL Logics We can generalise our question to a wider class of logics. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 5 /
47 IFL Logics We can generalise our question to a wider class of logics. Definition IFL is the family of logics in the language {,, } s.t.: M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 5 /
48 IFL Logics We can generalise our question to a wider class of logics. Definition IFL is the family of logics in the language {,, } s.t.: Have the same theorems of classical logic. The connective has a fixed point on a designated value and k k. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 5 /
49 IFL: basic facts Remark If L IFL then L is paraconsistent, i.e. α, α L β M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 6 /
50 IFL: basic facts Remark If L IFL then L is paraconsistent, i.e. α, α L β Lemma Let L IFL. Then there exists at least a designated truth value k s.t. k is not designated. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 6 /
51 IFL: basic facts Remark If L IFL then L is paraconsistent, i.e. α, α L β Lemma Let L IFL. Then there exists at least a designated truth value k s.t. k is not designated. Lemma A logic L IFL can not have a non designated value k such that k = k. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 6 /
52 Standard Gentzen Calculi In a standard calculus (L ) and (R ) must be of the form: Γ, α, β L Γ, α β Γ α, β, Γ α β, R M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 7 /
53 IFL: rules and soundess What does a standard R -rule for an IFL-logic look like? M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 8 /
54 IFL: rules and soundess What does a standard R -rule for an IFL-logic look like? Any possible sound R rule, whose conclusion is Γ, α, possess at least one premise of the following form: Γ, α. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 8 /
55 IFL: rules and soundess What does a standard R -rule for an IFL-logic look like? Any possible sound R rule, whose conclusion is Γ, α, possess at least one premise of the following form: That is Γ, α. P,..., Γ, α..., P n Γ α, M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 8 /
56 A limitative result Theorem Let L IFL and S be a standard Gentzen calculus for L. Then, if S is sound, it is incomplete. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 9 /
57 A limitative result Theorem Let L IFL and S be a standard Gentzen calculus for L. Then, if S is sound, it is incomplete. Sketch of the Proof L (α α) β and α, α L β (L IFL). Therefore S shall derive the sequent (α α) β. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 9 /
58 A limitative result Theorem Let L IFL and S be a standard Gentzen calculus for L. Then, if S is sound, it is incomplete. Sketch of the Proof L (α α) β and α, α L β (L IFL). Therefore S shall derive the sequent (α α) β. The derivation shall necessarily contain a tree with a branch of the form: α, α β R α α β (α α), β (α α) β R (Lemma) R M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 9 /
59 A limitative result Theorem Let L IFL and S be a standard Gentzen calculus for L. Then, if S is sound, it is incomplete. Sketch of the Proof L (α α) β and α, α L β (L IFL). Therefore S shall derive the sequent (α α) β. The derivation shall necessarily contain a tree with a branch of the form: α, α β R α α β (α α), β (α α) β R (Lemma) Since S is sound, the above derivation tree cannot terminate with axioms. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 9 / R
60 Work in Progress the algebraizability of the Gentzen system associated with PWK. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 0 /
61 Work in Progress the algebraizability of the Gentzen system associated with PWK. Can the limitative result be extended? M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 0 /
62 Work in Progress the algebraizability of the Gentzen system associated with PWK. Can the limitative result be extended? 3 Which is the strongest paraconsistent logic admitting a standard calculus? M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 0 /
63 Work in Progress the algebraizability of the Gentzen system associated with PWK. Can the limitative result be extended? 3 Which is the strongest paraconsistent logic admitting a standard calculus? 4 The regularization of a logic. M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 0 /
64 Thank you! M.Pra Baldi (with S.Bonzio) TACL 07 June 6, 07 /
Some extensions of the Belnap-Dunn logic
Some extensions of the Belnap-Dunn logic Umberto Rivieccio Università di Genova November 11th, 2010 Barcelona U. Rivieccio (Università di Genova) Some extensions of the Belnap-Dunn logic November 11th,
More informationPropositional Logic Language
Propositional Logic Language A logic consists of: an alphabet A, a language L, i.e., a set of formulas, and a binary relation = between a set of formulas and a formula. An alphabet A consists of a finite
More informationSemantics for Propositional Logic
Semantics for Propositional Logic An interpretation (also truth-assignment, valuation) of a set of propositional formulas S is a function that assigns elements of {f,t} to the propositional variables in
More informationOn the Construction of Analytic Sequent Calculi for Sub-classical Logics
On the Construction of Analytic Sequent Calculi for Sub-classical Logics Ori Lahav Yoni Zohar Tel Aviv University WoLLIC 2014 On the Construction of Analytic Sequent Calculi for Sub-classical Logics A
More informationA CUT-FREE SIMPLE SEQUENT CALCULUS FOR MODAL LOGIC S5
THE REVIEW OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC Volume 1, Number 1, June 2008 3 A CUT-FREE SIMPLE SEQUENT CALCULUS FOR MODAL LOGIC S5 FRANCESCA POGGIOLESI University of Florence and University of Paris 1 Abstract In this
More informationPropositional Logic: Deductive Proof & Natural Deduction Part 1
Propositional Logic: Deductive Proof & Natural Deduction Part 1 CS402, Spring 2016 Shin Yoo Deductive Proof In propositional logic, a valid formula is a tautology. So far, we could show the validity of
More informationFundamentals of Logic
Fundamentals of Logic No.5 Soundness and Completeness Tatsuya Hagino Faculty of Environment and Information Studies Keio University 2015/5/18 Tatsuya Hagino (Faculty of Environment and InformationFundamentals
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.lo] 10 Mar 2018
arxiv:1803.03822v1 [math.lo] 10 Mar 2018 Cut elimination, identity elimination, and interpolation in super-belnap logics Adam Přenosil Abstract We develop a Gentzen-style proof theory for super-belnap
More informationChapter 11: Automated Proof Systems (1)
Chapter 11: Automated Proof Systems (1) SYSTEM RS OVERVIEW Hilbert style systems are easy to define and admit a simple proof of the Completeness Theorem but they are difficult to use. Automated systems
More informationPhil Introductory Formal Logic
Phil 134 - Introductory Formal Logic Lecture 7: Deduction At last, it is time to learn about proof formal proof as a model of reasoning demonstrating validity metatheory natural deduction systems what
More informationOn relational interpretation of multi-modal categorial logics
Gerhard Jäger 1 On relational interpretation of multi-modal categorial logics Gerhard Jäger Gerhard.Jaeger@let.uu.nl Utrecht Institute of Linguistics (OTS) September 27, 2001 Gerhard Jäger 2 1 Outline
More informationNon-classical Logics: Theory, Applications and Tools
Non-classical Logics: Theory, Applications and Tools Agata Ciabattoni Vienna University of Technology (TUV) Joint work with (TUV): M. Baaz, P. Baldi, B. Lellmann, R. Ramanayake,... N. Galatos (US), G.
More informationOn Urquhart s C Logic
On Urquhart s C Logic Agata Ciabattoni Dipartimento di Informatica Via Comelico, 39 20135 Milano, Italy ciabatto@dsiunimiit Abstract In this paper we investigate the basic many-valued logics introduced
More informationPropositional Calculus - Natural deduction Moonzoo Kim CS Dept. KAIST
Propositional Calculus - Natural deduction Moonzoo Kim CS Dept. KAIST moonzoo@cs.kaist.ac.kr 1 Review Goal of logic To check whether given a formula Á is valid To prove a given formula Á ` Á Syntactic
More informationA GENTZEN SYSTEM EQUIVALENT TO THE BCK-LOGIC
Romà J. Adillon Ventura Verdú A GENTZEN SYSTEM EQUIVALENT TO THE BCK-LOGIC Abstract The sequent calculus L BCK is obtained by deleting the contraction rule and the introduction rules of the connectives
More informationOn some Metatheorems about FOL
On some Metatheorems about FOL February 25, 2014 Here I sketch a number of results and their proofs as a kind of abstract of the same items that are scattered in chapters 5 and 6 in the textbook. You notice
More informationProper multi-type display calculi for classical and intuitionistic inquisitive logic
1/18 Proper multi-type display calculi for classical and intuitionistic inquisitive logic Giuseppe Greco Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands www.appliedlogictudelft.nl TACL 2017, Prague Joint
More informationLogics preserving degrees of truth and the hierarchies of abstract algebraic logic
Logics preserving degrees of truth and the hierarchies of abstract algebraic logic Josep Maria Font Department of Probability, Logic and Statistics Faculty of Mathematics University of Barcelona XV Simposio
More informationON A SUBSTRUCTURAL LOGIC WITH MINIMAL NEGATION. Abstract
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 33/3 (2004), pp. 143 156 Roberto Arpaia ON A SUBSTRUCTURAL LOGIC WITH MINIMAL NEGATION Abstract In [3] and [1], Adillon and Verdú studied the intuitionistic contraction-less
More informationStructuring Logic with Sequent Calculus
Structuring Logic with Sequent Calculus Alexis Saurin ENS Paris & École Polytechnique & CMI Seminar at IIT Delhi 17th September 2004 Outline of the talk Proofs via Natural Deduction LK Sequent Calculus
More informationHypersequent Calculi for some Intermediate Logics with Bounded Kripke Models
Hypersequent Calculi for some Intermediate Logics with Bounded Kripke Models Agata Ciabattoni Mauro Ferrari Abstract In this paper we define cut-free hypersequent calculi for some intermediate logics semantically
More informationA Schütte-Tait style cut-elimination proof for first-order Gödel logic
A Schütte-Tait style cut-elimination proof for first-order Gödel logic Matthias Baaz and Agata Ciabattoni Technische Universität Wien, A-1040 Vienna, Austria {agata,baaz}@logic.at Abstract. We present
More informationAN ALTERNATIVE NATURAL DEDUCTION FOR THE INTUITIONISTIC PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 45/1 (2016), pp 33 51 http://dxdoiorg/1018778/0138-068045103 Mirjana Ilić 1 AN ALTERNATIVE NATURAL DEDUCTION FOR THE INTUITIONISTIC PROPOSITIONAL LOGIC Abstract
More informationAn Algebraic Proof of the Disjunction Property
An Algebraic Proof of the Disjunction Property Rostislav Horčík joint work with Kazushige Terui Institute of Computer Science Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Algebra & Coalgebra meet Proof Theory
More informationFROM AXIOMS TO STRUCTURAL RULES, THEN ADD QUANTIFIERS.
FROM AXIOMS TO STRUCTURAL RULES, THEN ADD QUANTIFIERS. REVANTHA RAMANAYAKE We survey recent developments in the program of generating proof calculi for large classes of axiomatic extensions of a non-classical
More informationGeneral methods in proof theory for modal logic - Lecture 1
General methods in proof theory for modal logic - Lecture 1 Björn Lellmann and Revantha Ramanayake TU Wien Tutorial co-located with TABLEAUX 2017, FroCoS 2017 and ITP 2017 September 24, 2017. Brasilia.
More informationAutomated Support for the Investigation of Paraconsistent and Other Logics
Automated Support for the Investigation of Paraconsistent and Other Logics Agata Ciabattoni 1, Ori Lahav 2, Lara Spendier 1, and Anna Zamansky 1 1 Vienna University of Technology 2 Tel Aviv University
More informationThe Skolemization of existential quantifiers in intuitionistic logic
The Skolemization of existential quantifiers in intuitionistic logic Matthias Baaz and Rosalie Iemhoff Institute for Discrete Mathematics and Geometry E104, Technical University Vienna, Wiedner Hauptstrasse
More informationAtomic Cut Elimination for Classical Logic
Atomic Cut Elimination for Classical Logic Kai Brünnler kaibruennler@inftu-dresdende echnische Universität Dresden, Fakultät Informatik, D - 01062 Dresden, Germany Abstract System SKS is a set of rules
More informationBounded Lukasiewicz Logics
Bounded Lukasiewicz Logics Agata Ciabattoni 1 and George Metcalfe 2 1 Institut für Algebra und Computermathematik, Technische Universität Wien Wiedner Haupstrasse 8-10/118, A-1040 Wien, Austria agata@logic.at
More informationFirst Part: Basic Algebraic Logic
First Part: Basic Algebraic Logic Francesco Paoli TACL 2013 Francesco Paoli (Univ. of Cagliari) Tutorial on algebraic logic TACL 2013 1 / 33 Outline of this tutorial 1 The basics of algebraic logic 2 Residuated
More informationSemantical Analysis of Weak Kleene Logics
Semantical Analysis of Weak Kleene Logics Roberto Ciuni Massimiliano Carrara Department FISPPA, Section of Philosophy, University of Padova Abstract This paper presents a semantical analysis of the Weak
More informationOutline. Overview. Syntax Semantics. Introduction Hilbert Calculus Natural Deduction. 1 Introduction. 2 Language: Syntax and Semantics
Introduction Arnd Poetzsch-Heffter Software Technology Group Fachbereich Informatik Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Sommersemester 2010 Arnd Poetzsch-Heffter ( Software Technology Group Fachbereich
More informationCut-Elimination and Quantification in Canonical Systems
A. Zamansky A. Avron Cut-Elimination and Quantification in Canonical Systems Abstract. Canonical propositional Gentzen-type systems are systems which in addition to the standard axioms and structural rules
More informationChapter 11: Automated Proof Systems
Chapter 11: Automated Proof Systems SYSTEM RS OVERVIEW Hilbert style systems are easy to define and admit a simple proof of the Completeness Theorem but they are difficult to use. Automated systems are
More informationCHAPTER 10. Gentzen Style Proof Systems for Classical Logic
CHAPTER 10 Gentzen Style Proof Systems for Classical Logic Hilbert style systems are easy to define and admit a simple proof of the Completeness Theorem but they are difficult to use. By humans, not mentioning
More informationComputational Logic. Davide Martinenghi. Spring Free University of Bozen-Bolzano. Computational Logic Davide Martinenghi (1/30)
Computational Logic Davide Martinenghi Free University of Bozen-Bolzano Spring 2010 Computational Logic Davide Martinenghi (1/30) Propositional Logic - sequent calculus To overcome the problems of natural
More informationDisplay calculi in non-classical logics
Display calculi in non-classical logics Revantha Ramanayake Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien) Prague seminar of substructural logics March 28 29, 2014 Revantha Ramanayake (TU Wien) Display calculi
More informationPropositional Logic Sequent Calculus
1 / 16 Propositional Logic Sequent Calculus Mario Alviano University of Calabria, Italy A.Y. 2017/2018 Outline 2 / 16 1 Intuition 2 The LK system 3 Derivation 4 Summary 5 Exercises Outline 3 / 16 1 Intuition
More information185.A09 Advanced Mathematical Logic
185.A09 Advanced Mathematical Logic www.volny.cz/behounek/logic/teaching/mathlog13 Libor Běhounek, behounek@cs.cas.cz Lecture #1, October 15, 2013 Organizational matters Study materials will be posted
More informationAn Introduction to Proof Theory
An Introduction to Proof Theory Class 1: Foundations Agata Ciabattoni and Shawn Standefer anu lss december 2016 anu Our Aim To introduce proof theory, with a focus on its applications in philosophy, linguistics
More informationCut-free Ordinary Sequent Calculi for Logics Having Generalized Finite-Valued Semantics
Cut-free Ordinary Sequent Calculi for Logics Having Generalized Finite-Valued Semantics Arnon Avron, Jonathan Ben-Naim and Beata Konikowska 1. Introduction For at least seven decades, many-valued logics
More informationSLANEY S LOGIC F IS CONSTRUCTIVE LOGIC WITH STRONG NEGATION
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 39:3/4 2010, pp. 161 173 M. Spinks and R. Veroff SLANEY S LOGIC F IS CONSTRUCTIVE LOGIC WITH STRONG NEGATION Abstract In [19] Slaney et al. introduced a little known
More information5-valued Non-deterministic Semantics for The Basic Paraconsistent Logic mci
5-valued Non-deterministic Semantics for The Basic Paraconsistent Logic mci Arnon Avron School of Computer Science, Tel-Aviv University http://www.math.tau.ac.il/ aa/ March 7, 2008 Abstract One of the
More informationTABLEAUX VARIANTS OF SOME MODAL AND RELEVANT SYSTEMS
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 17:3/4 (1988), pp. 92 98 reedition 2005 [original edition, pp. 92 103] P. Bystrov TBLEUX VRINTS OF SOME MODL ND RELEVNT SYSTEMS The tableaux-constructions have a
More informationPreuves de logique linéaire sur machine, ENS-Lyon, Dec. 18, 2018
Université de Lorraine, LORIA, CNRS, Nancy, France Preuves de logique linéaire sur machine, ENS-Lyon, Dec. 18, 2018 Introduction Linear logic introduced by Girard both classical and intuitionistic separate
More informationInducing syntactic cut-elimination for indexed nested sequents
Inducing syntactic cut-elimination for indexed nested sequents Revantha Ramanayake Technische Universität Wien (Austria) IJCAR 2016 June 28, 2016 Revantha Ramanayake (TU Wien) Inducing syntactic cut-elimination
More informationInterpolation via translations
Interpolation via translations Walter Carnielli 2,3 João Rasga 1,3 Cristina Sernadas 1,3 1 DM, IST, TU Lisbon, Portugal 2 CLE and IFCH, UNICAMP, Brazil 3 SQIG - Instituto de Telecomunicações, Portugal
More informationRecent Developments in and Around Coaglgebraic Logics
Recent Developments in and Around Coaglgebraic Logics D. Pattinson, Imperial College London (in collaboration with G. Calin, R. Myers, L. Schröder) Example: Logics in Knowledge Representation Knowledge
More informationClassical Propositional Logic
The Language of A Henkin-style Proof for Natural Deduction January 16, 2013 The Language of A Henkin-style Proof for Natural Deduction Logic Logic is the science of inference. Given a body of information,
More informationPropositional Calculus - Deductive Systems
Propositional Calculus - Deductive Systems Moonzoo Kim CS Division of EECS Dept. KAIST moonzoo@cs.kaist.ac.kr http://pswlab.kaist.ac.kr/courses/cs402-07 1 Deductive proofs (1/3) Suppose we want to know
More informationDeep Sequent Systems for Modal Logic
Deep Sequent Systems for Modal Logic Kai Brünnler abstract. We see a systematic set of cut-free axiomatisations for all the basic normal modal logics formed from the axioms t, b,4, 5. They employ a form
More informationProof Theoretical Studies on Semilattice Relevant Logics
Proof Theoretical Studies on Semilattice Relevant Logics Ryo Kashima Department of Mathematical and Computing Sciences Tokyo Institute of Technology Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8552, Japan. e-mail: kashima@is.titech.ac.jp
More informationCanonical Calculi: Invertibility, Axiom expansion and (Non)-determinism
Canonical Calculi: Invertibility, Axiom expansion and (Non)-determinism A. Avron 1, A. Ciabattoni 2, and A. Zamansky 1 1 Tel-Aviv University 2 Vienna University of Technology Abstract. We apply the semantic
More information(Algebraic) Proof Theory for Substructural Logics and Applications
(Algebraic) Proof Theory for Substructural Logics and Applications Agata Ciabattoni Vienna University of Technology agata@logic.at (Algebraic) Proof Theory for Substructural Logics and Applications p.1/59
More informationProof Theoretical Reasoning Lecture 3 Modal Logic S5 and Hypersequents
Proof Theoretical Reasoning Lecture 3 Modal Logic S5 and Hypersequents Revantha Ramanayake and Björn Lellmann TU Wien TRS Reasoning School 2015 Natal, Brasil Outline Modal Logic S5 Sequents for S5 Hypersequents
More informationNON-DETERMINISTIC SEMANTICS FOR LOGICAL SYSTEMS
ARNON AVRON AND ANNA ZAMANSKY NON-DETERMINISTIC SEMANTICS FOR LOGICAL SYSTEMS 1.1 The Key Idea 1 INTRODUCTION The principle of truth-functionality (or compositionality) is a basic principle in many-valued
More informationdistinct models, still insists on a function always returning a particular value, given a particular list of arguments. In the case of nondeterministi
On Specialization of Derivations in Axiomatic Equality Theories A. Pliuskevicien_e, R. Pliuskevicius Institute of Mathematics and Informatics Akademijos 4, Vilnius 2600, LITHUANIA email: logica@sedcs.mii2.lt
More informationLOGICS OF VARIETIES, LOGICS OF SEMILATTICES, AND CONJUNCTION
LOGICS OF VARIETIES, LOGICS OF SEMILATTICES, AND CONJUNCTION JOSEP MARIA FONT AND TOMMASO MORASCHINI Abstract. This paper starts with a general analysis of the problem of how to associate a logic with
More informationCONTRACTION CONTRACTED
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 43:3/4 (2014), pp. 139 153 Andrzej Indrzejczak CONTRACTION CONTRACTED Abstract This short article is mainly of methodological character. We are concerned with the
More informationNonclassical logics (Nichtklassische Logiken)
Nonclassical logics (Nichtklassische Logiken) VU 185.249 (lecture + exercises) http://www.logic.at/lvas/ncl/ Chris Fermüller Technische Universität Wien www.logic.at/people/chrisf/ chrisf@logic.at Winter
More informationMultiplicative Conjunction as an. ARNON AVRON, School of Mathematical Sciences, Sackler Faculty of
Multiplicative Conjunction as an Extensional Conjunction ARNON AVRON, School of Mathematical Sciences, Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. E-mail: aa@math.tau.ac.il
More information1. Tarski consequence and its modelling
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 36:1/2 (2007), pp. 7 19 Grzegorz Malinowski THAT p + q = c(onsequence) 1 Abstract The famous Tarski s conditions for a mapping on sets of formulas of a language:
More informationA SEQUENT CALCULUS FOR A NEGATIVE FREE LOGIC
A SEQUENT CALCULUS FOR A NEGATIVE FREE LOGIC Abstract This article presents a sequent calculus for a negative free logic with identity, called N. The main theorem (in part 1) is the admissibility of the
More informationON THE LOGIC OF DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Volume 18/2 (1989), pp. 79 85 reedition 2006 [original edition, pp. 79 86] Josep M. Font and Ventura Verdú ON THE LOGIC OF DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES This note is a summary
More informationA simple proof that super-consistency implies cut elimination
A simple proof that super-consistency implies cut elimination Gilles Dowek 1 and Olivier Hermant 2 1 École polytechnique and INRIA, LIX, École polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France gilles.dowek@polytechnique.edu
More informationOn Axiomatic Rejection for the Description Logic ALC
On Axiomatic Rejection for the Description Logic ALC Hans Tompits Vienna University of Technology Institute of Information Systems Knowledge-Based Systems Group Joint work with Gerald Berger Context The
More informationFrom Frame Properties to Hypersequent Rules in Modal Logics
From Frame Properties to Hypersequent Rules in Modal Logics Ori Lahav School of Computer Science Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv, Israel Email: orilahav@post.tau.ac.il Abstract We provide a general method
More informationChapter I: Introduction to Mathematical Fuzzy Logic
Chapter I: Introduction to Mathematical Fuzzy Logic LIBOR BĚHOUNEK, PETR CINTULA, AND PETR HÁJEK This chapter provides an introduction to the field of mathematical fuzzy logic, giving an overview of its
More informationAdjoint Logic and Its Concurrent Semantics
Adjoint Logic and Its Concurrent Semantics Frank Pfenning ABCD Meeting, Edinburgh, December 18-19, 2017 Joint work with Klaas Pruiksma and William Chargin Outline Proofs as programs Linear sequent proofs
More informationMathematics for linguists
Mathematics for linguists WS 2009/2010 University of Tübingen January 7, 2010 Gerhard Jäger Mathematics for linguists p. 1 Inferences and truth trees Inferences (with a finite set of premises; from now
More informationOn weakening the Deduction Theorem and strengthening Modus Ponens
Math. Log. Quart. 50, No. 3, 303 324 (2004) / DOI 10.1002/malq.200410001 / www.mlq-journal.org On weakening the Deduction Theorem and strengthening Modus Ponens Félix Bou 1,2, Josep Maria Font 1, and JoséLuisGarcía
More informationExtensions of Analytic Pure Sequent Calculi with Modal Operators
Extensions of Analytic Pure Sequent Calculi with Modal Operators Yoni Zohar Tel Aviv University (joint work with Ori Lahav) GeTFun 4.0 Motivation C 1 [Avron, Konikowska, Zamansky 12] Positive rules of
More informationNatural Deduction for Propositional Logic
Natural Deduction for Propositional Logic Bow-Yaw Wang Institute of Information Science Academia Sinica, Taiwan September 10, 2018 Bow-Yaw Wang (Academia Sinica) Natural Deduction for Propositional Logic
More informationOn sequent calculi vs natural deductions in logic and computer science
On sequent calculi vs natural deductions in logic and computer science L. Gordeev Uni-Tübingen, Uni-Ghent, PUC-Rio PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, October 13, 2015 1. Sequent calculus (SC): Basics -1- 1. Sequent
More informationSubminimal Logics and Relativistic Negation
School of Information Science, JAIST March 2, 2018 Outline 1 Background Minimal Logic Subminimal Logics 2 Some More 3 Minimal Logic Subminimal Logics Outline 1 Background Minimal Logic Subminimal Logics
More informationCut-elimination for Provability Logic GL
Cut-elimination for Provability Logic GL Rajeev Goré and Revantha Ramanayake Computer Sciences Laboratory The Australian National University { Rajeev.Gore, revantha }@rsise.anu.edu.au Abstract. In 1983,
More informationLogical Preliminaries
Logical Preliminaries Johannes C. Flieger Scheme UK March 2003 Abstract Survey of intuitionistic and classical propositional logic; introduction to the computational interpretation of intuitionistic logic
More informationTopos Theory. Lectures 17-20: The interpretation of logic in categories. Olivia Caramello. Topos Theory. Olivia Caramello.
logic s Lectures 17-20: logic in 2 / 40 logic s Interpreting first-order logic in In Logic, first-order s are a wide class of formal s used for talking about structures of any kind (where the restriction
More information3 Propositional Logic
3 Propositional Logic 3.1 Syntax 3.2 Semantics 3.3 Equivalence and Normal Forms 3.4 Proof Procedures 3.5 Properties Propositional Logic (25th October 2007) 1 3.1 Syntax Definition 3.0 An alphabet Σ consists
More informationMadhavan Mukund Chennai Mathematical Institute
AN INTRODUCTION TO LOGIC Madhavan Mukund Chennai Mathematical Institute E-mail: madhavan@cmiacin Abstract ese are lecture notes for an introductory course on logic aimed at graduate students in Computer
More informationThe Method of Socratic Proofs for Normal Modal Propositional Logics
Dorota Leszczyńska The Method of Socratic Proofs for Normal Modal Propositional Logics Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego w Zielonej Górze Rozprawa doktorska napisana pod kierunkiem prof.
More informationProving Completeness for Nested Sequent Calculi 1
Proving Completeness for Nested Sequent Calculi 1 Melvin Fitting abstract. Proving the completeness of classical propositional logic by using maximal consistent sets is perhaps the most common method there
More informationDynamic Epistemic Logic Displayed
1 / 43 Dynamic Epistemic Logic Displayed Giuseppe Greco & Alexander Kurz & Alessandra Palmigiano April 19, 2013 ALCOP 2 / 43 1 Motivation Proof-theory meets coalgebra 2 From global- to local-rules calculi
More informationProof Systems for Reasoning about Computation Errors
A. Avron B. Konikowska Proof Systems for Reasoning about Computation Errors Abstract. In the paper we examine the use of non-classical truth values for dealing with computation errors in program specification
More informationImplicational F -Structures and Implicational Relevance. Logics. A. Avron. Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences. School of Mathematical Sciences
Implicational F -Structures and Implicational Relevance Logics A. Avron Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences School of Mathematical Sciences Tel Aviv University Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel Abstract We describe
More informationMultiset Consequence Relations
Multiset Consequence Relations Francesco Paoli Gargnano, 27.08.15 Francesco Paoli (Univ. Cagliari) Multiset Gargnano, 27.08.15 1 / 71 Outline of this talk 1 The basics of algebraic logic 2 Substructural
More informationPrefixed Tableaus and Nested Sequents
Prefixed Tableaus and Nested Sequents Melvin Fitting Dept. Mathematics and Computer Science Lehman College (CUNY), 250 Bedford Park Boulevard West Bronx, NY 10468-1589 e-mail: melvin.fitting@lehman.cuny.edu
More informationWhat is an Ideal Logic for Reasoning with Inconsistency?
What is an Ideal Logic for Reasoning with Inconsistency? Ofer Arieli School of Computer Science The Academic College of Tel-Aviv Israel Arnon Avron School of Computer Science Tel-Aviv University Israel
More informationArnon Avron. School of Mathematical Sciences. Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences. Tel Aviv University. Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Multiplicative Conjunction as an Extensional Conjunction Arnon Avron School of Mathematical Sciences Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv 69978, Israel Abstract We show that the
More information3.17 Semantic Tableaux for First-Order Logic
3.17 Semantic Tableaux for First-Order Logic There are two ways to extend the tableau calculus to quantified formulas: using ground instantiation using free variables Tableaux with Ground Instantiation
More informationChapter 3: Propositional Calculus: Deductive Systems. September 19, 2008
Chapter 3: Propositional Calculus: Deductive Systems September 19, 2008 Outline 1 3.1 Deductive (Proof) System 2 3.2 Gentzen System G 3 3.3 Hilbert System H 4 3.4 Soundness and Completeness; Consistency
More informationCategories, Proofs and Programs
Categories, Proofs and Programs Samson Abramsky and Nikos Tzevelekos Lecture 4: Curry-Howard Correspondence and Cartesian Closed Categories In A Nutshell Logic Computation 555555555555555555 5 Categories
More informationLogics for Compact Hausdorff Spaces via de Vries Duality
Logics for Compact Hausdorff Spaces via de Vries Duality Thomas Santoli ILLC, Universiteit van Amsterdam June 16, 2016 Outline Main goal: developing a propositional calculus for compact Hausdorff spaces
More informationBoolean BI is Decidable (via Display Logic)
Boolean BI is Decidable (via Display Logic) James Brotherston Dept. of Computing Imperial College, London, UK Abstract We give a display calculus proof system for Boolean BI (BBI) based on Belnap s general
More informationAdvances in the theory of fixed points in many-valued logics
Advances in the theory of fixed points in many-valued logics Department of Mathematics and Computer Science. Università degli Studi di Salerno www.logica.dmi.unisa.it/lucaspada 8 th International Tbilisi
More informationCounterfactual Logic: Labelled and Internal Calculi, Two Sides of the Same Coin?
Counterfactual Logic: Labelled and Internal Calculi, Two Sides of the Same Coin? Marianna Girlando, Sara Negri, Nicola Olivetti 1 Aix Marseille Univ, Université de Toulon, CNRS, LIS, Marseille, France;
More informationDiscrete Mathematics
Discrete Mathematics Yi Li Software School Fudan University March 13, 2017 Yi Li (Fudan University) Discrete Mathematics March 13, 2017 1 / 1 Review of Lattice Ideal Special Lattice Boolean Algebra Yi
More informationGentzen Sequent Calculus LK
October 8, 2007 Completeness of Gentzen LK Proof for completeness to the proof Start from the root Γ Given a node Φ Ψ, break both Φ and Ψ until they only contain propositional variables Can be done using
More informationLecture 10: Gentzen Systems to Refinement Logic CS 4860 Spring 2009 Thursday, February 19, 2009
Applied Logic Lecture 10: Gentzen Systems to Refinement Logic CS 4860 Spring 2009 Thursday, February 19, 2009 Last Tuesday we have looked into Gentzen systems as an alternative proof calculus, which focuses
More information