A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE ANTIPODAL SET OF MOST SYMMETRIC SPACES OF COMPACT TYPE
|
|
- Christal Gaines
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Beyrer, J. Osaka J. Math. 55 (08), A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF THE ANTIPODAL SET OF MOST SYMMETRIC SPACES OF COMPACT TYPE Jonas BEYRER (Received April 8, 06, revised March 3, 07) Abstract It is known that the antipodal set of a Riemannian symmetric space of compact type G/K consists of a union of K-orbits. We determine the dimensions of these K-orbits of most irreducible symmetric spaces of compact type. The symmetric spaces we are not going to deal with are those with restricted root system a r and a non-trivial fundamental group, which is not isomorphic to Z or Z r+. For example, we show that the antipodal sets of the Lie groups Spin(r + ) r 5, E 8 and G consist only of one orbit which is of dimension r, 8 and 6, respectively; SO(r + ) has also an antipodal set of dimension r; and the Grassmannian Gr r,r+q (R) hasarq-dimensional orbit as antipodal set if r 5andr q > 0.. Introduction The antipodal set of a point p M in a connected, compact Riemannian manifold (M,g). Introduction is the set of points q M with maximal distance to p and is denoted by A(p). Given a general Riemannian manifold M, it is not known how to determine A(p), but if M is a symmetric space of compact type the situation changes; bringing us to the purpose of this paper: We give a complete description of the antipodal set of most (Riemannian) symmetric space of compact type. The problem of determining the antipodal set in a symmetric space is not new. Already in 978 J. Tirao [7] solved it for symmetric spaces of rank one. However for higher rank symmetric spaces little was known. Only S. Deng and X. Liu [3] determined those compact simply connected symmetric spaces that have a finite number of points as antipodal set. In addition they gave the exact number of points. We note that, given a symmetric space of compact type, it is enough to determine the antipodal set in each of the irreducible components, as by de Rham s decomposition theorem the antipodal set of the whole space is the product of the antipodal sets in the irreducible components. Therefore we assume from now on M G/K to be an irreducible symmetric space of compact type, if not stated otherwise. Being able to restrict to irreducible spaces is important for us, as we do case by case calculations. It is quite immediate that the antipodal set of p G/K is a union of orbits of the form exp p (Ad(K)x) for specific x p T p G/K. L. Yang determined in [8] those x of all irreducible compact simply connected symmetric spaces and in [9] those x of most irreducible non-simply connected symmetric spaces of compact type. He did not determine x for those G/K that have restricted root system a r and a non-trivial fundamental group, which is not 00 Mathematics Subject Classification. E6, 53C30.
2 568 J. Beyrer isomorphic to Z or Z r+. Since the knowledge of x is essential for this work, we are not able to determine the antipodal set in those cases. Therefore we refer to them as excluded cases. In this paper we analyze the antipodal set of G/K by determining the dimensions of the orbits exp ek (Ad(K)x) building the antipodal set, if G/K is not one of the excluded cases. The paper is organized as follows: In section we describe some well known facts on symmetric spaces and their antipodal set. In section 3 we use those facts to give an explicit description of the tangent space of the antipodal set of G/K. IfG/K is in addition simply connected this description reads as follows: Let α i be simple roots of the restricted root system Σ of G/K, ψ = r i= d i α i the highest root, J j = {α = r k= c k α k Σ + c j N}, p(α) the root spaces in p and x = πe j, where e j is a maximal corner. Then the tangent space of exp ek (Ad(K)x) A(eK) is a parallel translate of α J p(α). For a precise description j of maximal corners see section.3. In section we use this description to determine the dimensions of all orbits in all G/K but the excluded ones explicitly case be case. We give several example calculations, the other cases can be treated in the same manner. In the tables at the end of section the whole results are stated. We want to remark that the natural numbers N contain zero in our notation and furthermore that a different definition of antipodal set of symmetric spaces exists in the literature, describing a different object.. Preliminaries.. Some facts on symmetric spaces of compact type. Before we start with analyzing.. Preliminaries Some facts on symmetric spaces of compact type. the problem, we want to coarsely remind of some properties of symmetric spaces of compact type. A proper description of the following and definitions of the named objects can for example be found in []. A compact simply connected symmetric spaces is of compact type. Furthermore the simply connected cover of a symmetric space of compact type is compact itself. An irreducible symmetric space of compact type M is isometric to the space G/K := I 0 (M)/(I 0 (M)) p with I 0 (M) being the connected component of the identity of the isometry group of M and (I 0 (M)) p being the stabilizer of a point p M of the natural action of the isometry group. The metric on G/K corresponds to a left invariant extension of a multiple of the Killing form on Lie(G) = g. As G/K is of compact type, g is semi-simple. Furthermore there exists a natural involution on g. Letk and p be the and - eigenspaces of this involution, respectively. The decomposition g = k + p is called the Cartan decomposition. The space p has the property that it is isometric to T ek G/K. Let h p be a maximal abelian subspace in p. We define for α h p g(α) := {X g [H, [H, X]] = α(h) X for all H h p }. If g(α) 0andα 0, we call α a root. Furthermore we set k(α) := g(α) k, p(α) := g(α) p. We call dim k(α)themultiplicity of the root α and the set of all roots Σ restricted root system. Let B(, ) be the Killing from on g. Asg is semi-simple, we can identify an element α h p with an element H α h p by the relation α(h) = B(H α, H) for all H h p.wedefineb on
3 Antipodal Set of Symmetric Spaces 569 h p by B(α, β) := B(H α, H β )forα, β h p.inthiscase(σ, cb(, )) is an abstract root system for an suitable constant c R. For notational reasons we just write (, ) instead of cb(, ). For the abstract root system we can fix an ordering and get a set of positive roots Σ +. With respect to Σ + we can decompose the spaces k and p as follows () k = k(0) k(α), p = p(0) p(α). α Σ + α Σ + These decompositions are called root space decomposition of k andp, respectively. Let Σ be a root system, a set Σ Σ is called root subsystem, if the following holds:. for α, β Σ it is α + β Σ,ifα + β Σ,. Σ = Σ. A root subsystem is an abstract root system itself and clearly there is a unique ordering compatible with the ordering on Σ. Similar to the root space decompositions we define for a root subsystem Σ () k( Σ) := k(0) k(α). α Σ +.. Basic properties of the antipodal set. Mathematically, the antipodal set of a point.. Basic properties of the antipodal set. p G/K is given by A(p) = {x G/K d(x, p) d(y, p) y G/K}. Let p = ak G/K be arbitrary and let l a be the left multiplication by a. Then d(y, ek) d(x, ek) d(l a (y), p) d(l a (x), p) x,y G/K, which implies A(p) = l a (A(eK)). Let d(g/k) denote the diameter. As G/K is compact, we find p 0, q 0 G/K with d(p 0, q 0 ) = d(g/k). The isometry group of a symmetric space acts transitively therefore q A(p) if and only if d(p, q) = d(g/k). Hence every q A(p) can be joined to p by a geodesic which is minimizing till q but not beyond. It follows A(p) C(p), where C(p) denotes the cut locus of p. Thus A(p) = {x C(p) d(x, p) d(y, p) y C(p)}. The set of points X T p G/K with exp p (tx) being a minimizing geodesic for t < and not minimizing for t > is called the cut locus of p in T p G/K or alternatively the cut locus of p in the tangent space and is denoted by C T (p). We use this to define the antipodal set in the tangent space to be (3) A T (p) := {X C T (p) X Y Y C T (p)}. If X C T (p), then X = d(exp p (X), p) and exp p maps C T (p) onto C(p), thus () exp p (A T (p)) = A(p). As the antipodal sets of two points are isometric, it is enough to consider only ek. Inview of () we need to make two steps, namely determining A T (ek) and analyzing exp ek..3. Cut locus and antipodal set in the tangent space for simply connected symmetric.3. Cut locus and antipodal set in the tangent space for simply connected symmetric spaces. Let Σ be the restricted root system of G/K, where G/K is an irreducible compact spaces. simply connected symmetric space. We fix an ordering on Σ that we keep for the rest of this paper. Furthermore let Σ + be the set of positive roots, Π Σ the set of simple roots and ψ the
4 570 J. Beyrer highest roots of Σ with respect to this ordering. There is only one highest root, as G/K is irreducible. L. Yang [8] defined the Cartan polyhedron to be (5) := {x h p γ(x) 0forγ Π Σ ψ(x) }. Clearly the condition that γ(x) 0forγ Π Σ implies that is contained in the closure of a Weyl chamber. The side of the Cartan polyhedron that does not contain 0 is denoted by (6) := {x ψ(x) = }. Now we are able to cite the following theorem, which gives an explicit description of the cut locus in the tangent space. Theorem. (see [8] p. 689 and Appendix). Let G/K be a compact simply connected symmetric space. Then C T (ek) = Ad(K)(π ). An immediate consequence of this theorem is, by (3) and the fact that K acts orthogonally, that A T (ek) = Ad(K)(π max( )), with max( ):= {x x y y }. The following proposition is well known. Proposition.. Let G/K be an irreducible symmetric space of compact type. For an orbit of the form Ad(K)x, with x C and C being a closed Weyl chamber, we have Ad(K)x C = {x}. This proposition implies that A T (ek) consists of a union of orbits and the set of orbits is in one to one correspondence to the set max( ). L. Yang [8] has determined the set max( ) more precise. For the convenience of the reader, we explain his approach and some of his steps: As said before, (Σ, (, )) is an abstract irreducible root system. Hence the Weyl chamber is a cone and we only have one highest root. It follows that the Cartan polyhedron is a simplex. We observe that for x, x and t [0, ], we have (7) (tx + ( t)x, tx + ( t)x ) max{(x, x ), (x, x ) }. We conclude that the function Rsending x (x, x) reaches its maximum on the vertices, but not on 0. Let {α,...,α r } be a set of simple roots of Σ and ψ = r i= d i α i its highest root. Each side of the Cartan polyhedron is contained in a hyperplane of the form {x h p α i (x) = 0} or {x h p ψ(x) = }, hence the vertices of the Cartan polyhedron are the points that lie in r of these r + hyperplanes. These points are 0 and e j with j =,...,r such that (8) In particular we get α i (e j ) = δ ij. max( ) = {e j (e j, e j ) = max (e i, e i ) }. i=,...,r We call the corners e j of the Cartan polyhedron with e j max( ) the maximal corners
5 Antipodal Set of Symmetric Spaces 57 of the Cartan polyhedron. For each irreducible restricted root system those corners can be determined with straight forward calculations. This is done in [8]. The results are listed in the following table. We want to remark that we used the indexing of the simple roots as in [] p. 77, 78, which differs in the cases e 6, e 7, e 8 and g from the one in [8]. The factors of the highest root are well known (see [] Plate I - IX). Table. Maximal corners of the Cartan polyhedron and the corresponding factors of the highest root (see [8] p ) Σ max( ) Factors Σ max( ) Factors a r e r ; e r+ d r = ; d r+ = d r, r > e r ; e r d r = ; d r = a r e r d r = e 6 e ; e 6 d = ; d 6 = b, b 3 e d = e 7 e 7 d 7 = b e ; e d = ; d = e 8 e d = b r, r > e r d r = f e d = c r e r d r = g e d = 3 d e ; e 3 ; e d = d 3 = d = bc r e r d r = The maximal corners are not explicitly stated in [8], but can easily be deduced. Exemplary, we give L. Yangs calculation for Σ=a r : A choice of simple roots of Σ is α = x x,...,α r = x r x r+ for {x, x,...,x r+ } a basis of R r+ such that (x i, x j ) = (ψ, ψ)δ ij and ψ = r i= α i the highest root (see [] p. 65). We see that the factors d i in front of the simple roots building ψ are all equal to. As the corners of the Cartan polyhedron satisfy α i (e j ) = (α i, e j ) = δ ij, we can deduce j (r + j) (ψ, ψ)(r + ) e j = x k j x j n. k= k= j+ k This gives j(r + j) (e j, e j ) = (ψ, ψ)(r + ). For r odd this is maximal if j = r+ and for r even this is maximal if j = r or j = r +. Hence the maximal corner of the Cartan polyhedron corresponding to a r is e r and for a r the maximal corners are e r, e r+... Cut locus and antipodal set in the tangent space for non-simply connected symmetric spaces. Let M be an irreducible compact simply connected symmetric space. We.. Cut locus and antipodal set in the tangent space for non-simply connected symmetric spaces. can write M = G/ K with G simply connected. Throughout this section G is always chosen simply connected. We define For this set L. Yang showed the following: r+ Z G/ K( K) := {p G/ K k p = p k K}.
6 57 J. Beyrer Proposition.3 (see [9] p ). Notations as before. For every p = a K G/ K\{e K} the following are equivalent: (a) p Z G/ K( K); (b) a N G( K), where N G( K) denotes the normalizer of K in G; (c) p = exp e K (πe j), where e j is a corner of the Cartan polyhedron such that =. Furthermore Z G/ K( K) is a finite abelian group which can be identified with a subgroup of G. We want to give some short comments on this proposition. The equivalence of (a) and (b) can be easily seen from the fact that ka K = a K for all k K and a K Z G/ K( K). From this it follows that Z G/ K( K) is a group. Part of the proof is to show that the map Ψ(a K) := aσ (a) is well defined on Z G/ K( K), where σ is the natural involution on G. Furthermore one shows that Ψ : Z G/ K( K) Z( G) is a monomorphism, while Z( G) denotes the center of G. Then Z G/ K( K) is a finite abelian group and the map Ψ gives an identification with a subgroup of G. Proposition. (see [9] p. 59). Every symmetric space M of compact type with simply connected cover M = G/ K can be expressed as a quotient M/Γ for a subgroup Γ < Z M( K) and for every subgroup Γ < Z M( K) the space M/Γ is a symmetric space which is covered by M. The quotient M = M/Γ is called a Clifford-Klein form of M. Let Σ be the restricted root system of M and hence also of M. In addition let ψ be the highest root, the Cartan polyhedron and e i the corners of the Cartan polyhedron. For a symmetric space M with Clifford-Klein-form M/Γ we define, same as L. Yang [9], the sets P Γ := {x (x, e i ) (e i, e i ) for every exp e K (πe i) Γ}, P Γ := {x P Γ (x,ψ) = exp e K (πe i) Γ :(x, e i ) = (e i, e i )}. The set P Γ or more precisely its boundaries which do not contain zero, namely P Γ,play an important role in the description of the cut locus in the tangent space. This is given by the next theorem. Theorem.5 (see [9] p. 5 and Appendix). Let M = G/ K be an irreducible compact simply connected symmetric space and let M = G/K be a symmetric spaces covered by M. Let M = M/Γ be a Clifford-Klein form, where Γ is a non-trivial subgroup of Z M( K). Then C T (ek) = Ad(K)(πP Γ ). Similar as in the simply connected case, this theorem implies together with (3) and the fact that K acts orthogonally that A T (ek) = Ad(K)(π max(p Γ )), where max(p Γ ):= {x P Γ x y y P Γ } and G/K is non-simply connected. By Proposition. we can derive a one to one correspondence of points in max(p Γ ) and orbits building the antipodal set in the tangent space. We want to determine the set max(p Γ ). By a similar argument as in (7) it follows that this set is a subset of the corners of the polyhedron P Γ. The explicit description of Γ given at the beginning of this section, allows to try to determine max(p Γ ) of every irreducible non-simply
7 Antipodal Set of Symmetric Spaces 573 connected symmetric space in case by case calculations. L. Yang has done this implicitly in [9], where he determined the diameter of irreducible non-simply connected symmetric spaces of compact type. As part of this calculations he also determined all possible subgroups of Z M( K). In the case that Σ=a r and Γ is not isomorphic to Z or Z r+ he did not determine the diameter and therefore we don t know the set max(p Γ ). However, for all the other cases we can derive max(p Γ ). The results are given in the table below. In the table the subgroup Γ is given only up to isomorphism, if none of the subgroups of Z M( K) are isomorphic. Otherwise they are given explicitly. Our indexing of the roots is again as in [] p. 77, 78 and differs therefore for e 6 and e 7 from the one in [9]. Again the factors of the highest root are well known. Table. Maximal corners of P Γ for most non-simply connected G/K = M/ Γ and the corresponding factors of the highest root (see [9] p and Appendix) Σ Γ max(p Γ ) Factors of ψ a r r 3, r odd and Z e r+ r+ even a r r 3, r odd and Z (e r + e r+3 ) (, ) r+ odd a r Z r+ r+ (e e r ) (,...,) a r otherwise unknown b r Z e r c r r even Z e r c r r odd Z (e r + e r+ ) (, ) d r r even Z Z e r d r r odd Z (e r + e r+ ) (, ) d r r {e, p } e r ; e r ; d r r even, r 6 {e, p r } e d 8 {e, p r } e ; e ; d r r even, r 0 {e, p r } e r d r r even, r 6 {e, p r } e d 8 {e, p r } e ; e ; d r r even, r 0 {e, p r } e r e 6 Z 3 e 3 e 7 Z e We use the notation e = e K, p i := exp e K (πe i). In the last column we write (d i, ), if the maximal corner is of the form c(e i + e j ) for some c R. We want to remark that if the restricted root system Σ is one of bc r, e 8, f or g, then
8 57 J. Beyrer Z M( K) = {e K} and hence there is no non-simply connected symmetric space of compact type with one of those restricted root systems. We give an example of how Yang rather implicitly determines max(p Γ ) in the case that Σ=d r and Γ={e K, exp e K (πe )}: At first he gives explicit descriptions of the maximal corners of the Cartan polyhedron e i up to a scaling by (ψ, ψ), where ψ is the highest root of d r. From that he shows (e, e ) = (ψ, ψ) and (e, e i ) = (ψ, ψ) for all i r, but then (e, e i ) = (e, e ). This implies that the corners of P Γ include e,...e r. By definition P Γ.Asnowmax( ) = {e r, e r } P Γ, it follows that max(p Γ ) = {e r, e r }..5. Orbits of the adjoint representation and the isotropy algebra. In the subsections.5. Orbits of the adjoint representation and the isotropy algebra. before we have seen that the antipodal set in the tangent space consists of a union of orbits of the form Ad(K)x for x π max( )orx π max(p Γ ). It is well known that Ad(K)x is an embedded submanifold of p, as it is the orbit of a Lie group action of a compact Lie group. Let K x be the stabilizer of x under the adjoint action. The embedding i has the form i : K/K x Ad(K)x. Letk x be the Lie algebra of K x, which is called isotropy algebra. Then (9) T x A T (ek) = di T ekx K/K x = di k/k x. Hence the following proposition helps us to determine T x A T (ek). Proposition.6 (see [5] proposition.). Foragivenx h p,letσ x := {α Σ α(x) = 0}. Then Σ x is a root subsystem. The isotropy subalgebra of the adjoint representation at x is of the form k x = k(σ x ). 3. The tangent space of the antipodal set In this section we give an explicit description of the tangent space of the antipodal set of 3. The tangent space of the antipodal set all irreducible symmetric spaces of compact type, but those with restricted root system a r and a non-trivial fundamental group different from Z or Z r+. This enables us to calculate its dimensions in the next section. We have seen in the previous section that, if we are not in one of the excluded cases, the antipodal set in the tangent space consists of disjoint orbits of x with x = πe j, x = π (e j+e j+ ) for some specific j or x = π r+ (e + + e r ). We fix one such x. Letp := exp ek (x). By () and (9) we have (0) T p A(eK) = (d exp ek ) x (T x A T (ek)) = (d exp ek ) x di(k/k x ). To calculate this tangent space we first need to determine k/k x, then map it by di to p and at last apply (d exp ek ) x. For the first step Proposition.6, () and () yield k/k x = (k(0) k(α))/(k(0) α Σ + k(α)) α Σ + x α Σ + \Σ + x By definition i maps kk x to Ad(k)x, hence (di) ekx = ad x.lety k(α), α Σ + \Σ + x and H h p. It is easy to check that ad H ((di) ek x (Y)) = α(h) [Y, x]. This implies (di) ekx (Y) k(α).
9 Antipodal Set of Symmetric Spaces 575 g(α) and as [Y, x] p,even(di) ekx (Y) p(α). Since di is of full rank and dim k(α) = dim p(α) ([6] p. 60), this implies (di) ekx (k(α)) = p(α). Let p x 0 denote the parallel transport from 0 to x. We summarize what we have just shown. Proposition 3.. Notations as before, then T x Ad(K)x = p x 0 ( p(α)). α Σ + \Σ + x We determine now Σ + \Σ + x for the three types of x using Proposition.6. Let {α,...,α r } be the set of simple roots of Σ with respect to the fixed ordering. Let x = πe j. Then Σ x = {α = r k= c k α k α(πe j ) = 0}. Asα(πe j ) = 0 c j = 0, we get Σ + \Σ + x = {α = r k= c k α k c j > 0}. Let x = π (e j + e j+ ). With a similar argument we derive Σ + \Σ + x = {α = r k= c k α k c j > 0 c j+ > 0}. Let x = π r+ (e +...+e r ). Since α( π r+ (e +...+e r )) = π r+ (c +...+c r )forα = r k= c k α k, we get Σ x = and hence Σ + \Σ + x =Σ +. For the last step, namely applying (d exp ek ) x, we use the following theorem. Theorem 3. (see [] p. 35 and Appendix). Notations as before. Let H h p, then the Euclidean parallel translate of α(h) 0 to H constitutes the kernel of d(exp ek ) H. mod π ; α(h) 0;α Σ + p(α) We consider the three types of x separately. Again ψ = r i= d i α i is the highest root of Σ and α = r k= c k α k Σ + thus c k N. Let x = πe j. Then α(x) = πα(e j ) = π c j. If we apply Theorem 3., we see that p(α) is part of the kernel of (d exp ek ) πe j if and only if c j N\{0}. Thus ker((d exp ek ) x ) = p x 0 ( p(α)), α J j where J j := {α = r k= c k α k Σ c j N\{0}}. Let x = π (e j + e j+ ). Then α(x) = π α(e j + e j+ ) = π ( c j + c j+ + ). We see that p(α) is part of the kernel of (d exp ek ) πe j if and only if c j + c j+ + N\{0}. Thus ker((d exp ek ) x ) = p x 0 ( p(α)), α J j, j+ where J j, j+ := {α = r k= c k α k Σ c j + c j+ + N\{0}}. Let x = π r+ (e e r ). Then α( π r+ (e +...e r )) = π r+ (c c r ). Note that we can assume in this case Σ=a r and therefore c i = 0, ifαis a positive root. It follows
10 576 J. Beyrer r+ (c c r ) N. Hence ker((d exp ek ) x ) = {0}. Let for the moment be p := p x o. In view of (0), Proposition 3. and the results on ker((d exp ek ) x ) we have just shown, we get T expek (x) exp ek (Ad(K)x) =p( p(α))/p( p(α) α Σ + \Σ + x α I =p( p(α)), α I α Σ + \Σ + x p(α)) where I = J j, J j, j+ or, depending on which x we are considering, and I := (Σ + \Σ + x )\(I Σ + \Σ + x ). We summarize our results in a theorem. Theorem 3.3. Let G/K be an irreducible symmetric space of compact type, that has not both the restricted root system Σ=a r and a non-trivial Γ Z or Z r+,whereγ is given through a Clifford-Klein-form of G/K. Let ψ = r i= d i α i be the highest root of the restricted root system and assume roots are written in the way α = r k= c k α k. Furthermore let {e,...,e r } be the corners of the Cartan polyhedron. If G/K is simply connected, then take x π max( ),ifg/k is non-simply connected, then take x π max(p Γ ), while max( ) and max(p Γ ) are given in the tables,. Then exp ek (x) A(eK) and the tangent space of the antipodal set at exp ek (x) can be given explicitly depending on the form of x. Ifx = πe j, then T expek (x)a(ek) = p x 0 ( If x = π (e j + e j+ ), then T expek (x)a(ek) = p x 0 ( If x = π r+ (e e r ), then α J j, j+ α J j p(α)), for J j = {α Σ+ c j N}. p(α)), J j, j+ = {α Σ+ c j + c j+ + N}. T expek (x)a(ek) = p x 0 ( p(α)). α Σ + Proof. Almost everything has been proved so far. What is left, is to verify that J j = (Σ + \Σ + x )\(J j Σ + \Σ + x )andj j, j+ = (Σ+ \Σ + x )\(J j, j+ Σ + \Σ + x ), which is straight forward. We know that for a positive root α = r k= c k α k it is c k N. Let again x = πe j.ifthe corresponding factor of the highest root equals, we have c j / = c j N. Inthiscase J j = and hence dim(t expek (x)a(ek)) = 0. Thus some cases with dim(t expek (x)a(ek)) = 0 can be read of tables and. The calculations in the next section show that this are all cases. For simply connected G/K this result was first proved by Deng and Liu in [3]. We state it in the corollary below. Corollary 3. (see [3]). Let G/K be an irreducible compact simply connected symmetric space with restricted root system Σ. Let ψ = r i= d i α i be the highest root and let e j be a
11 Antipodal Set of Symmetric Spaces 577 maximal corner of the Cartan polyhedron. If =, then dim exp ek (Ad(K)(πe j )) = 0. In particular dim(a(ek)) = 0 if Σ is one of the following: b, b 3, a r, c r, d r, e 6 or e 7.. Dimensions of the orbits building the antipodal set Let x π max( )orx π max(p Γ )andx π. Dimensions of the orbits building the antipodal r+ (e e r ). In view of Theorem 3.3, set we have seen that x = πe j or x = π (e j + e j+ )and r dim T expek (x)a(ek) = dim p(α), J j = {α = c k α k Σ + c j N} or dim T expek (x)a(ek) = dim α J j α J j, j+ k= p(α), J j, j+ = {α c j + c j+ + N} To determine the dimension of A(eK)atexp ek (x) we do the following:. Determine the set J j,ifx = πe j or J j, j+,ifx = π (e j + e j+ ).. Sum up the dimensions of the spaces p(α)forα J j or J j, j+. If there are more than one maximal corners, we consider each corner and its orbit separately. The union of these orbits builds the antipodal set. The maximal corners and the corresponding factors are given in table and table. The facts on root systems can for example be found in []. The root multiplicities are well known, see for example [6] p. 9 and p. 6. Throughout the rest of the section let {x,...,x r } be a possibly scaled standard basis. We give several calculations as example, as the other calculation are in the same manner we leave them away anust state the whole results in the tables at the end of this section. Simply connected symmetric spaces: Let G/K be a symmetric space of compact type with restricted root system Σ = bc r. Then G/K is simply connected. A choice of simple roots of bc r is {α,...,α r,α r } = {x x,...,x r x r, x r }. Thus the positive roots are Σ + = {x i ± x j (i < j), x i, x i }. The maximal corner of the Cartan polyhedron is e r, hence the antipodal set consists of one orbit and is therefore a manifold. The highest root is given by ψ = r j= α j, meaning d r =. Thus c r /d r N if and only if c r =. It is straight forward to check J r = {x,...,x r }. Type A III with Σ=bc r : Given a symmetric space of type A III of the form G/K = SU(r + q)/s (U(r) U(r + q)), then the multiplicities of the roots α = ±x i are m α = q. Hence dim A(eK) = qr. Type C II with Σ=bc r : For a symmetric space of type C II of the form G/K = SP(r+q)/ (SP(r) SP(r+q)) the multiplicities of the roots α = ±x i are m α = q. Thus dim A(eK) = qr. Type D III with Σ=bc r : Let us consider a symmetric space of type D III. In this case the multiplicities of the roots α = ±x i are m α =. Hence the dimension of the antipodal set of G/K = SO(r + )/U(r + ) takes the value dim A(eK) = r.
12 578 J. Beyrer Type E III with Σ=bc : For a symmetric space of type E III the multiplicities of the roots α = ±x i are m α = 8. Hence, if G/K = E 6 /Spin(0) SO(), then dim A(eK) = 6. Type F II with Σ=bc : A symmetric space of type F II has root multiplicities m α = 8 for α = ±x i. Thus for G/K = F /Spin(9)wehavedimA(eK) = 8. Let now G/K be a compact simply connected symmetric space with Σ=b r.bytablewe get three different cases. For r =, 3 the antipodal set is of dimension zero (see Corollary 3.), for r = it is the union of a positive dimensional manifold and a point and for r > it is a positive dimensional manifold. In the following we determine the positive dimensional part, thus r. A choice of simple roots is {α,...,α r,α r } = {x x,...,x r x r, x r }, then Σ + = {x i ± x j (i < j), x i }. The maximal corner of the Cartan polyhedron is e r with d r =. We get J r = {x,...,x r }. Type BD I with Σ = b r : For a simply connected symmetric space of type BD I the multiplicities of the roots α = ±x i are m α = q. Thus for G/K = G r,r+q with r andq > 0, the positive dimensional part of the antipodal set is of dimension rq. Spin(r+): We consider the Lie group Spin(r + ) with r. In this case the multiplicities of all roots are m α = and thus the positive dimensional part of the antipodal set is of dimension r. Non-simply connected symmetric spaces: Type BD I with Σ=b r and Γ=Z : Let M/Γ be an irreducible symmetric space given in the Clifford-Klein-form such that M = Gr r,r+q, r, q > 0, Σ=b r and Γ=Z. In this case max(p Γ ) = {e r} and d r =. A choice of simple roots is {α,...,α r,α r } = {x x,...,x r x r, x r }, hence Σ + = {x i ± x j (i < j), x i }. It is easy to check that J r = {x,...,x r }. The root multiplicities of those roots are q, which implies dim A(eK) = rq. Type A I with Γ=Z : Let M/Γ be an irreducible symmetric space of type A I such that Γ=Z. In this case Σ=a r. If r 3, r odd and r+ even, then max(p Γ ) = {e r+ }.Asdr+ =, it follows dim A(eK) = 0. If r 3, r and r+ odd, then max(p Γ ) = { (e r + e r+3 )} and d r Σ + = {x i x j i < j r + } and we are looking for those roots with c r J r, r+3 = {x i x r+3 roots are, we deduce dim A(eK) = r. i < r+3 } {xr+3 x j r+3 = = d r+3. Since + c r+3 =, we get < j r + }. As the root multiplicities of all Type C II with Γ=Z : Let M/Γ be an irreducible symmetric space of type C II such that Γ = Z. InthiscaseΣ = c r. We take the simple roots to be {α,...,α r,α r } = {x x,...,x r x r, x r }, which yields Σ + = {x i ± x j (i < j), x i }. If r is even, we have max(p Γ ) = {e r } and d r =. We are looking for those roots that have c r =. The result is J r = {x i ± x j i r < j}. As the root multiplicities of x i ± x j with i j are, we derive dim A(eK) = r.
13 If r is odd, we have max(p Γ ) = { (e r + e r+ if and only if c r + c r+ =, or 3. Thus J r, r+ J r, r+ Antipodal Set of Symmetric Spaces 579 )} and d r = {x i ± x j i r +, i < j, j r + = = d r+. Then α = r i= c i α i } {x r+ }. The root multiplicities are m xi ±x j = fori j and m xi = 3 and hence dim A(eK) = r + r 3. Spin(r)/Γ with Γ = : Consider the Lie group Spin(r)/Γ with Γ =. Then Σ=d r. A set of simple roots can be chosen to be {x x,...,x r x r, x r + x r }. In this case we get Σ + = {x i ± x j i < j}. If r is even, then Γ=Z Z. The maximal corner is e r and d r =. One can check that J r = {x i ± x j i r < j}. The root multiplicities are, thus dim A(eK) = r. If r is odd, then Γ=Z. The maximal corner is (e r + e r+ )anddr = = d r+. Similar as before we are looking for roots with c r + c r+ =, or3.wegetj r = {x, r+ i ± x j i < j, i r+, j r+ }. The root multiplicities are, thus dim A(eK) = r + r 3. Type E I with Γ=Z 3 : A choice of simple roots is α = (x + x 8 x x 3... x 7 ), α = x + x, α 3 = x x, α = x 3 x, α 5 = x x 3, α 6 = x 5 x. In this case Σ + = {x i ± x j j < i 5} { (x 8 x 7 x ( ) v(i) x i ) i= 5 v(i) iseven}. The maximal corner is e and d = 3. Thus we are looking for roots such that c = or. There are no roots with c > 3. We get the following result J = {x i x j j < i 5} {x i + x j j < i, 3 i 5} {α + x i x i = 3, or5} {α + x i + x j j < i 5} {α + α 3 + x i + x j ( j, i) = (3, ), (3, 5) or (, 5)} As J = 7 and m α = for all roots, we get dim A(eK) = 7. Let us consider some cases, where x = π r+ (e e r ) max(p Z r+ ). If x is of that form, then it has to be Σ=a r. It is well known that in this case all root multiplicities are the same. As now T expek (x)a(ek) = p x 0 ( α Σ p(α)), we get dim A(eK) = m + α a + r, where m α is the root multiplicity and a + r = r(r+). Type A I with rank r and Γ=Z r+ : We have m α =, therefore dim A(eK) = r(r+). Type A II with rank r and Γ=Z r+ : We have m α =, therefore dim A(eK) = r(r + ). Type E IV with Γ=Z 3 : We have m α = 8, this gives dim A(eK) =. SU(r+) with Γ=Z r+ : In this case m α =, therefore dim A(eK) = r(r + ). i=
14 580 J. Beyrer The following four tables contain the dimensions of the different components of the antipodal set of all irreducible symmetric spaces of compact type, but those cases explicitly excluded. We want to give a few remarks on those tables: If there is more than one maximal corner, then the dimensions of the corresponding orbits in the following column are listed in the same order as the maximal corners. The indexing of the simple roots is again as in [] p. 77, 78. In the following q is a positive integer. Furthermore we use the notation e = ek and p i = exp ek (πe i ). Other references were given at the beginning of this section. Table 3. Maximal corners of the Cartan polyhedron and the dimensions of the components of the antipodal set of irreducible compact simply connected symmetric spaces of type I Type M or (g, k) Σ max( ) dim A AI SU(r)/SO(r) a r e r 0 SU(r + )/SO(r + ) a r e r ; e r+ 0; 0 AII SU(r)/Sp(r) a r e r 0 SU(r + )/Sp(r + ) a r e r ; e r+ 0; 0 A III Gr r,r+q (C), r, q orr = bc r e r qr Gr r,r (C), r c r e r 0 CI Sp(r)/U(r) c r e r 0 CII Gr r,r+q (H), r, q orr = bc r e r qr Gr r,r (H), r c r e r 0 BD I Gr r,r+q, r =, 3 b r e 0 Gr,+q b e ; e 0; q Gr r,r+q, r 5 b r e r rq Gr,+q a e 0 Gr,8 d e ; e 3 ; e 0; 0; 0 Gr r,r, r 5 d r e r ; e r 0; 0 D III SO(r)/U(r) c r e r 0 SO(r + )/U(r + ) bc r e r r EI (e 6, sp()) e 6 e ; e 6 0; 0 EII (e 6, su(6) su()) f e 6 E III (e 6, so(0) R) bc e 6 EIV (e 6, f ) a e ; e 0; 0 EV (e 7, su(8)) e 7 e 7 0 EVI (e 7, so() su()) f e 3 EVII (e 7, e 6 R) c 3 e 3 0 E VIII (e 8, so(6)) e 8 e 6 EIX (e 8, e 7 su()) f e 6
15 Antipodal Set of Symmetric Spaces 58 FI (f, sp(3) su()) f e 8 FII (f, so(9)) bc e 8 G (g, su() su()) g e 3 Table. Dimensions of the components of the antipodal set of irreducible symmetric spaces of compact type and type I Type M or (g, k) Σ Γ dim A AI SU(r + )/SO(r + ), a r+ Z 0 r+ even SU(r + )/SO(r + ), r+ odd a r+ Z r + r(r+) SU(r + )/SO(r + ) a r Z r+ otherwise unknown AII SU(r+)/Sp(r+), r+ even SU(r+)/Sp(r+), r+ odd a r+ Z 0 a r+ Z 8r + SU(r + )/Sp(r + ) a r Z r+ r(r + ) otherwise A III Gr r,r (C), r, r even c r Z r unknown Gr r,r (C), r, r odd c r Z r + r CI Sp(r)/U(r) r even c r Z r Sp(r)/U(r) r odd c r Z (r + r ) CII Gr r,r (H), r, r even c r Z r Gr r,r (H), r, r odd c r Z r + r 3 BD I Gr r,r+q r b r Z rq Gr r,r r even d r Z Z r Gr r,r r odd d r Z (r + r 3) Gr r,r r even d r {e, p } 0; 0 Gr r,r r 6, r even d r {e, p r } or {e, p r } 0 Gr 8,8 d 8 {e, p r } or {e, p r } 0; r Gr r,r r 0, r even d r {e, p r } or {e, p r } r D III SO(r)/U(r), r even c r Z r SO(r)/U(r), r odd c r Z r + r 5 EI (e 6, sp()) e 6 Z 3 7 EIV (e 6, f ) a Z 3 EV (e 7, su(8)) e 7 Z 35 EVII (e 7, e 6 R) c 3 Z 9
16 58 J. Beyrer Table 5. Maximal corners of the Cartan polyhedron and the dimensions of the components of the antipodal set of irreducible compact simply connected symmetric spaces of type II G Σ max( ) dim A SU(r) a r e r 0 SU(r + ) a r e r ; e r+ 0; 0 Spin(r + ) r =, 3 b r e 0 Spin(9) b e ; e 0; 8 Spin(r + ) r > b r e r r Sp(r) c r e r 0 Spin(8) d e ; e 3 ; e 0; 0; 0 Spin(r) r 5 d r e r ; e r 0; 0 E 6 e 6 e ; e 6 0; 0 E 7 e 7 e 7 0 E 8 e 8 e 8 F f e 6 G g e 6 Table 6. Dimensions of the components of the antipodal set of irreducible symmetric spaces of compact type and type II G Σ Γ dim A SU(r + ) a r+ Z r + SU(r + ) a r Z r+ r(r + ) otherwise Spin(r + ) b r Z r Sp(r) r even c r Z r unknown Sp(r) r odd c r Z r + r Spin(r) r even d r Z Z r Spin(r) r odd d r Z r + r 3 Spin(r) r even d r {e, p } 0; 0 Spin(r) r =, 6 d r {e, p r } or {e, p r } 0 Spin(6) d 8 {e, p r } or {e, p r } 0; 6 Spin(r) r 0, r even d r {e, p r } or {e, p r } r E 6 e 6 Z 3 5 E 7 e 7 Z 70
17 Antipodal Set of Symmetric Spaces Appendix In the sections above we have cited a few results that are not stated in the literature exactly 5. Appendix in the way we presented them. For Theorem., Theorem.5 and Theorem 3. this goes back to the fact that we use a different definition of the restricted root system. While the maximal corners we cited are not exactly given in the literature, they can be easily derived as we show below. 5.. Yangs theorems. We want to derive Theorem. from Theorem.3 in [8]. As 5.. Yangs theorems. Theorem.5 can be derived from Theorem. in [9] in a similar way, we leave that away. Let M = G/K be an irreducible compact simply connected symmetric space. Let g = Lie(G) and g C it s complexification. In view of [6] p. 73 there is another way to define restricted roots, namely by the following: Definition 5.. Let g C = k C + p C be the decomposition coming from the Cartan decomposition g = k + p. Then h p C := h C p is a maximal abelian subspace in p C. Furthermore let g C γ := {X g C ad H (X) = γ(h)x H h p C}. Then γ ˆΣ if and only if γ h p C, such that g γ {0} and γ 0. The set ˆΣ is again called restricted root system. This is an equivalent description to the one Yang uses in [8] (see [6] p. 73). It is well known that ˆΣ is an irreducible abstract root system. Let Π ˆΣ be the simple roots of ˆΣ and ψ the highest root of ˆΣ. In the same manner as before in (5) and (6), let ˆΣ = {x h p γ(x) 0forγ ΠˆΣ ψ(x) }, while h p and hence also h p are naturally R-subspaces of h p C. The edges that do not contain 0 are denoted by := {x ˆΣ ˆΣ ψ(x) = }. Now we are able to cite the theorem by L. Yang. Theorem 5. (see [8] p. 689). Let M = G/K be a compact simply connected symmetric space. Then C T (ek) = Ad(K)(π ). ˆΣ To get that version we wrote in Theorem. we need to show that =.Since ˆΣ ˆΣ h p it is clear that ˆΣ h p. We use the following: Lemma 5.3 (see [6] p. 58, 60). Let G/K be a symmetric space and Σ h p, ˆΣ h p C the corresponding restricted root systems described above. Then ˆΣ =Σ. This lemma in particular implies that if γ ˆΣ, then γ h p. Having given a set of positive roots Σ +, the simple roots are those positive roots that can not be written as the sum of two others. This implies that if we take a set of positive roots Σ + and put ˆΣ + := Σ +, then the sets of simple roots are related by Π Σ = ΠˆΣ, while it is routine to show that
18 58 J. Beyrer Σ + is a set of positive roots. We denote the Weyl chambers of Σ + and ˆΣ + by C Σ + and C ˆΣ +, respectively. Let H C ˆΣ + h p and γ ΠˆΣ. Then γ( H) > 0 γ(h) > 0. As γ Π Σ, all elements in Π Σ can be won in this way, and γ was an arbitrary simple root, it follows H C Σ +. With another argument of that form it follows C Σ + = C ˆΣ +.Let ψ ˆΣ such that ψ is the highest root of Σ, γ ˆΣ and H C Σ +. Then ψ(h) γ(h) ψ( H) γ( H). This implies that ψ is the highest root of Σ. In particular it follows that = ˆΣ. 5.. Maximal corners of irreducible non-simply connected symmetric spaces. We 5.. Maximal corners of irreducible non-simply connected symmetric spaces. shortly explain how the maximal corners of P Γ can be derived from [9]. For each of the 9 cases Yang has considered we give the approach to determine the maximal corners out of his results. In the cases II, VII, VIII and IX he determined all the corners of P Γ, thus the results given in table can be easily verified. Case VI was described above and case III is similar to that. In case I Yang proves that the there is only one maximal corner and it is straight forward to verify that the given one is the right one. Let s consider case IV and V. As the diameter of P Γ is given we can easily check that the given points in table are maximal corners. All the information for doing that is given in section 5 and 6 of [9]. Thus we need to show that those are all maximal corners. We do this exemplary for case IV. Yang showed that x = r i= λ i x i P Γ if and only if r () λ λ 0,...,λ r λ r,λ r 0 λ (ψ, ψ), r λ i (ψ, ψ). We set D = {λ,...,λ r [0, (ψ,ψ) ] ri= λ i r (ψ,ψ)}. In the proof of Lemma 6.. in [9] it is shown that for every (μ,...,μ r ) D with r i= μ i = r (ψ,ψ) the intersection {μ i i r} (0, (ψ,ψ) ) has at most one element. If we take into account that by () the elements λ i should be arranged in decreasing order and that e r = r i= (ψ,ψ) x i, (e r + e r+ ) = r i= (ψ,ψ) x i +, the uniqueness of the maximal corner follows. (ψ,ψ) x r Crittendens theorem. Here we want to derive Theorem 3. from Theorem 3 in [] Crittendens theorem. Let e be the exponential map in G and P := e p. Then P is a symmetric space and there is adiffeomorphism μ : G/K P defined by μ(gk) := g(σ(g)), where σ is the involution on G (see [] p. 3). It is well known that (dμ) ek : T ek G/K p p is of the form (dμ) ek = Id. Furthermore the following diagram is commutative (see [] p. 3) T ek G/K exp ek dμ p G/K P μ In the paper [] roots are defined as those elements ᾱ h p, where a non-zero, - e i=
19 Antipodal Set of Symmetric Spaces 585 dimensional invariant subspace Vᾱ exists, such that for a suitable basis ( ) 0 πᾱ ad g (h p ) Vᾱ =. πᾱ 0 We denote by Σ the set of these roots. Let Vᾱ := β=±ᾱ V β, while for β there might exist more than one V β. Lemma 5.. Notations as before. Then Vᾱ = g(πᾱ) and Σ =Σ/π. Proof. Since ad g (h p ) Vᾱ = ( ) ( ) πᾱ 0 πᾱ 0 π ᾱ, ad g (h p ) 0 V ᾱ = 0 π ᾱ it follows that Vᾱ g(πᾱ). The root space decomposition of g and the decomposition of g into eigenspaces of ᾱ Σ (see [] p. 3) are of the form g = g(0) g(α) and g = g(0) Vᾱ, α Σ + ᾱ Σ + respectively. By dimensional reasons it has to be Vᾱ = g(πᾱ). This gives π Σ =Σor Σ =Σ/π. Since Vᾱ = g(πᾱ), it follows from the definition of p(α) that Vᾱ p = g(πᾱ) p = p(πᾱ) = p(α) forα Σ with α = πᾱ. Furthermore let n : T 0 p p denote the natural identification. We cite the theorem which we want to apply to our situation. Theorem 5.5 (see [] p. 35). Let H h p. Then the Euclidean parallel translate of n ( Vᾱ p ) ᾱ(h) 0 mod ;ᾱ(h) 0;ᾱ Σ + to H constitutes the kernel of the differential e at H. Now we are able to derive Theorem 3.. Proof. Since μ is a diffeomorphism, we have ker((d exp ek ) H ) = ker((dμ d exp ek ) H ). With the commutativity of the diagram above it follows ker((d exp ek ) H ) = ker(d(e dμ)) H ) = ker((de ) H ). If we apply Theorem 5.5, it follows that those spaces Vᾱ p constitute to ker((de ) H ), where ᾱ Σ + with ᾱ(h) 0 mod and ᾱ(h) 0. In view of Lemma 5., we can write ᾱ = α/π with α Σ. Hence ᾱ(h) = α(h) 0 mod α(h) = 0 mod π. π In the same way ᾱ(h) 0 is equivalent to α(h) 0. As Vᾱ p = p(πᾱ) = p(α), we get ker((d exp ek ) H ) = ker((de ) H ) =n ( Vᾱ p ) ᾱ(h) 0 mod ;ᾱ(h) 0;ᾱ Σ + =n ( p(α) ), α(h) 0 mod π ; α(h) 0;α Σ +
20 586 J. Beyrer for α Σ + with πᾱ = α. For simplicity the natural identification n was omitted in the sections above. Acknowledgements. I want to thank Oliver Goertsches very much for his many helpful comments. References [] N. Bourbaki: Lie Groups and Lie Algebras Chapters - 6, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, 008. [] R.J. Crittenden: Minimum and conjugate points in symmetric spaces, Canad. J. Math. (96), [3] S. Deng and X. Liu: The antipodal sets of compact symmetric spaces, Balkan. J. Geom. Appl. 9 (0), [] S. Helgason: Differential Geometry, Lie groups, and Symmetric Spaces, Graduate studies in Mathematics 3, Amer. Math. Soc., 000. [5] K. Kondo: Local orbits of S -representations of symmetric R-spaces, Tokyo J. Math 6 (003), [6] O. Loos: Symmetric Spaces II: Compact Spaces and Classification, W.A. Benjamin, Inc., New York- Amsterdam, 969. [7] J.A. Tirao: Antipodal manifolds in compact symmetric spaces of rank one, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (978), 3 9. [8] L. Yang: Injectivity radius and Cartan polyhedron for simply connected symmetric spaces, Chinese Ann. Math. B 8 (007), [9] L. Yang: Injectivity radius for non-simply connected symmetric spaces via Cartan polyhedron, Osaka J. Math. 5 (008), Mathematik Institut, Univeristät Zürich Winterthurerstrasse 90, 8057 Zürich Switzerland jonas.beyrer@math.uzh.ch
arxiv: v2 [math.dg] 25 Jan 2017
A complete description of the antipodal set of most symmetric spaces of compact type arxiv:1603.08816v [math.dg] 5 Jan 017 Jonas Beyrer September 1, 018 Abstract: It is known that the antipodal set of
More informationAustere pseudo-riemannian submanifolds and s-representations
Austere pseudo-riemannian submanifolds and s-representations Tokyo University of Science, D3 Submanifold Geometry and Lie Theoretic Methods (30 October, 2008) The notion of an austere submanifold in a
More informationREGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES
REGULAR TRIPLETS IN COMPACT SYMMETRIC SPACES MAKIKO SUMI TANAKA 1. Introduction This article is based on the collaboration with Tadashi Nagano. In the first part of this article we briefly review basic
More informationOn the Harish-Chandra Embedding
On the Harish-Chandra Embedding The purpose of this note is to link the Cartan and the root decompositions. In addition, it explains how we can view a Hermitian symmetric domain as G C /P where P is a
More informationOn classification of minimal orbits of the Hermann action satisfying Koike s conditions (Joint work with Minoru Yoshida)
Proceedings of The 21st International Workshop on Hermitian Symmetric Spaces and Submanifolds 21(2017) 1-2 On classification of minimal orbits of the Hermann action satisfying Koike s conditions (Joint
More information1 v >, which will be G-invariant by construction.
1. Riemannian symmetric spaces Definition 1.1. A (globally, Riemannian) symmetric space is a Riemannian manifold (X, g) such that for all x X, there exists an isometry s x Iso(X, g) such that s x (x) =
More informationKilling Vector Fields of Constant Length on Riemannian Normal Homogeneous Spaces
Killing Vector Fields of Constant Length on Riemannian Normal Homogeneous Spaces Ming Xu & Joseph A. Wolf Abstract Killing vector fields of constant length correspond to isometries of constant displacement.
More informationDifferential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces
Differential Geometry, Lie Groups, and Symmetric Spaces Sigurdur Helgason Graduate Studies in Mathematics Volume 34 nsffvjl American Mathematical Society l Providence, Rhode Island PREFACE PREFACE TO THE
More informationX-RAY TRANSFORM ON DAMEK-RICCI SPACES. (Communicated by Jan Boman)
Volume X, No. 0X, 00X, X XX Web site: http://www.aimsciences.org X-RAY TRANSFORM ON DAMEK-RICCI SPACES To Jan Boman on his seventy-fifth birthday. François Rouvière Laboratoire J.A. Dieudonné Université
More informationNEW REALIZATIONS OF THE MAXIMAL SATAKE COMPACTIFICATIONS OF RIEMANNIAN SYMMETRIC SPACES OF NON-COMPACT TYPE. 1. Introduction and the main results
NEW REALIZATIONS OF THE MAXIMAL SATAKE COMPACTIFICATIONS OF RIEMANNIAN SYMMETRIC SPACES OF NON-COMPACT TYPE LIZHEN JI AND JIANG-HUA LU Abstract. We give new realizations of the maximal Satake compactifications
More informationLECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI. 1. Maximal Tori
LECTURE 25-26: CARTAN S THEOREM OF MAXIMAL TORI 1. Maximal Tori By a torus we mean a compact connected abelian Lie group, so a torus is a Lie group that is isomorphic to T n = R n /Z n. Definition 1.1.
More informationL(C G (x) 0 ) c g (x). Proof. Recall C G (x) = {g G xgx 1 = g} and c g (x) = {X g Ad xx = X}. In general, it is obvious that
ALGEBRAIC GROUPS 61 5. Root systems and semisimple Lie algebras 5.1. Characteristic 0 theory. Assume in this subsection that chark = 0. Let me recall a couple of definitions made earlier: G is called reductive
More informationTopics in Representation Theory: Roots and Complex Structures
Topics in Representation Theory: Roots and Complex Structures 1 More About Roots To recap our story so far: we began by identifying an important abelian subgroup of G, the maximal torus T. By restriction
More informationLECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS. 1. Lie groups
LECTURE 16: LIE GROUPS AND THEIR LIE ALGEBRAS 1. Lie groups A Lie group is a special smooth manifold on which there is a group structure, and moreover, the two structures are compatible. Lie groups are
More informationANNIHILATING POLYNOMIALS, TRACE FORMS AND THE GALOIS NUMBER. Seán McGarraghy
ANNIHILATING POLYNOMIALS, TRACE FORMS AND THE GALOIS NUMBER Seán McGarraghy Abstract. We construct examples where an annihilating polynomial produced by considering étale algebras improves on the annihilating
More informationParameterizing orbits in flag varieties
Parameterizing orbits in flag varieties W. Ethan Duckworth April 2008 Abstract In this document we parameterize the orbits of certain groups acting on partial flag varieties with finitely many orbits.
More informationSYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5
SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY: LECTURE 5 LIAT KESSLER Let (M, ω) be a connected compact symplectic manifold, T a torus, T M M a Hamiltonian action of T on M, and Φ: M t the assoaciated moment map. Theorem 0.1 (The
More informationA method for construction of Lie group invariants
arxiv:1206.4395v1 [math.rt] 20 Jun 2012 A method for construction of Lie group invariants Yu. Palii Laboratory of Information Technologies, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia and Institute
More informationOn the Irreducibility of the Commuting Variety of the Symmetric Pair so p+2, so p so 2
Journal of Lie Theory Volume 16 (2006) 57 65 c 2006 Heldermann Verlag On the Irreducibility of the Commuting Variety of the Symmetric Pair so p+2, so p so 2 Hervé Sabourin and Rupert W.T. Yu Communicated
More informationMath 215B: Solutions 1
Math 15B: Solutions 1 Due Thursday, January 18, 018 (1) Let π : X X be a covering space. Let Φ be a smooth structure on X. Prove that there is a smooth structure Φ on X so that π : ( X, Φ) (X, Φ) is an
More informationA Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds
arxiv:math/0312251v1 [math.dg] 12 Dec 2003 A Problem of Hsiang-Palais-Terng on Isoparametric Submanifolds Haibao Duan Institute of Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, dhb@math.ac.cn
More informationA CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS
UNIVERSITATIS IAGELLONICAE ACTA MATHEMATICA, FASCICULUS XLI 2003 A CONSTRUCTION OF TRANSVERSE SUBMANIFOLDS by J. Szenthe Abstract. In case of Riemannian manifolds isometric actions admitting submanifolds
More informationLIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM
Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society Submitted Paper Paper 14 June 2011 LIMITING CASES OF BOARDMAN S FIVE HALVES THEOREM MICHAEL C. CRABB AND PEDRO L. Q. PERGHER Institute of Mathematics,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.gr] 8 Nov 2008
SUBSPACES OF 7 7 SKEW-SYMMETRIC MATRICES RELATED TO THE GROUP G 2 arxiv:0811.1298v1 [math.gr] 8 Nov 2008 ROD GOW Abstract. Let K be a field of characteristic different from 2 and let C be an octonion algebra
More informationSEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS
SEMISIMPLE LIE GROUPS BRIAN COLLIER 1. Outiline The goal is to talk about semisimple Lie groups, mainly noncompact real semisimple Lie groups. This is a very broad subject so we will do our best to be
More informationA Convexity Theorem For Isoparametric Submanifolds
A Convexity Theorem For Isoparametric Submanifolds Marco Zambon January 18, 2001 1 Introduction. The main objective of this paper is to discuss a convexity theorem for a certain class of Riemannian manifolds,
More informationTheorem 2. Let n 0 3 be a given integer. is rigid in the sense of Guillemin, so are all the spaces ḠR n,n, with n n 0.
This monograph is motivated by a fundamental rigidity problem in Riemannian geometry: determine whether the metric of a given Riemannian symmetric space of compact type can be characterized by means of
More informationTRANSLATION-INVARIANT FUNCTION ALGEBRAS ON COMPACT GROUPS
PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 15, No. 3, 1965 TRANSLATION-INVARIANT FUNCTION ALGEBRAS ON COMPACT GROUPS JOSEPH A. WOLF Let X be a compact group. $(X) denotes the Banach algebra (point multiplication,
More informationLECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM
LECTURE 10: THE ATIYAH-GUILLEMIN-STERNBERG CONVEXITY THEOREM Contents 1. The Atiyah-Guillemin-Sternberg Convexity Theorem 1 2. Proof of the Atiyah-Guillemin-Sternberg Convexity theorem 3 3. Morse theory
More informationCOHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II
COHOMOLOGY OF ARITHMETIC GROUPS AND EISENSTEIN SERIES: AN INTRODUCTION, II LECTURES BY JOACHIM SCHWERMER, NOTES BY TONY FENG Contents 1. Review 1 2. Lifting differential forms from the boundary 2 3. Eisenstein
More informationNotes on Lie Algebras
NEW MEXICO TECH (October 23, 2010) DRAFT Notes on Lie Algebras Ivan G. Avramidi Department of Mathematics New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Socorro, NM 87801, USA E-mail: iavramid@nmt.edu 1
More informationLECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES
LECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES 1. Proper actions Suppose G acts on M smoothly, and m M. Then the orbit of G through m is G m = {g m g G}. If m, m lies in the same orbit, i.e. m = g m for
More informationM4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1
Problem Sheet. Let X and Y be n-dimensional topological manifolds. Prove that the disjoint union X Y is an n-dimensional topological manifold. Is S S 2 a topological manifold? 2. Recall that that the discrete
More informationTHE SEMISIMPLE SUBALGEBRAS OF EXCEPTIONAL LIE ALGEBRAS
Trudy Moskov. Matem. Obw. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. Tom 67 (2006) 2006, Pages 225 259 S 0077-1554(06)00156-7 Article electronically published on December 27, 2006 THE SEMISIMPLE SUBALGEBRAS OF EXCEPTIONAL
More informationProjective Schemes with Degenerate General Hyperplane Section II
Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie Contributions to Algebra and Geometry Volume 44 (2003), No. 1, 111-126. Projective Schemes with Degenerate General Hyperplane Section II E. Ballico N. Chiarli S. Greco
More informationIsometries of Riemannian and sub-riemannian structures on 3D Lie groups
Isometries of Riemannian and sub-riemannian structures on 3D Lie groups Rory Biggs Geometry, Graphs and Control (GGC) Research Group Department of Mathematics, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
More informationPart III Symmetries, Fields and Particles
Part III Symmetries, Fields and Particles Theorems Based on lectures by N. Dorey Notes taken by Dexter Chua Michaelmas 2016 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often
More informationLongest element of a finite Coxeter group
Longest element of a finite Coxeter group September 10, 2015 Here we draw together some well-known properties of the (unique) longest element w in a finite Coxeter group W, with reference to theorems and
More informationBredon, Introduction to compact transformation groups, Academic Press
1 Introduction Outline Section 3: Topology of 2-orbifolds: Compact group actions Compact group actions Orbit spaces. Tubes and slices. Path-lifting, covering homotopy Locally smooth actions Smooth actions
More informationARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES
ASIAN J. MATH. c 2008 International Press Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 289 298, September 2008 002 ARITHMETICITY OF TOTALLY GEODESIC LIE FOLIATIONS WITH LOCALLY SYMMETRIC LEAVES RAUL QUIROGA-BARRANCO Abstract.
More informationProper SL(2,R)-actions on homogeneous spaces
Proper SL(2,R)-actions on homogeneous spaces arxiv:1405.4167v3 [math.gr] 27 Oct 2016 Maciej Bocheński, Piotr Jastrzębski, Takayuki Okuda and Aleksy Tralle October 28, 2016 Abstract We study the existence
More informationLecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra
Lecture Notes Introduction to Cluster Algebra Ivan C.H. Ip Update: May 16, 2017 5 Review of Root Systems In this section, let us have a brief introduction to root system and finite Lie type classification
More informationSymmetric Spaces. Andrew Fiori. Sept McGill University
McGill University Sept 2010 What are Hermitian? A Riemannian manifold M is called a Riemannian symmetric space if for each point x M there exists an involution s x which is an isometry of M and a neighbourhood
More informationSymmetries, Fields and Particles 2013 Solutions
Symmetries, Fields and Particles 013 Solutions Yichen Shi Easter 014 1. (a) Define the groups SU() and SO(3), and find their Lie algebras. Show that these Lie algebras, including their bracket structure,
More informationHYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS
HYPERKÄHLER MANIFOLDS PAVEL SAFRONOV, TALK AT 2011 TALBOT WORKSHOP 1.1. Basic definitions. 1. Hyperkähler manifolds Definition. A hyperkähler manifold is a C Riemannian manifold together with three covariantly
More informationHomogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds. Dmitri V. Alekseevsky
Homogeneous para-kähler Einstein manifolds Dmitri V. Alekseevsky Hamburg,14-18 July 2008 1 The talk is based on a joint work with C.Medori and A.Tomassini (Parma) See ArXiv 0806.2272, where also a survey
More informationB 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.
Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2
More informationVINCENT PECASTAING. University of Luxembourg, Mathematics Research Unit Maison du nombre, 6 avenue de la Fonte L-4364 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg 1
CONFORMAL ACTIONS OF REAL-RANK 1 SIMPLE LIE GROUPS ON PSEUDO-RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS VINCENT PECASTAING University of Luxembourg, Mathematics Research Unit Maison du nombre, 6 avenue de la Fonte L-4364 Esch-sur-Alzette,
More informationSymmetric Spaces Toolkit
Symmetric Spaces Toolkit SFB/TR12 Langeoog, Nov. 1st 7th 2007 H. Sebert, S. Mandt Contents 1 Lie Groups and Lie Algebras 2 1.1 Matrix Lie Groups........................ 2 1.2 Lie Group Homomorphisms...................
More informationRoots and Root Spaces of Compact Banach Lie Algebras
Irish Math. Soc. Bulletin 49 (2002), 15 22 15 Roots and Root Spaces of Compact Banach Lie Algebras A. J. CALDERÓN MARTÍN AND M. FORERO PIULESTÁN Abstract. We study the main properties of roots and root
More informationHomotopy and homology groups of the n-dimensional Hawaiian earring
F U N D A M E N T A MATHEMATICAE 165 (2000) Homotopy and homology groups of the n-dimensional Hawaiian earring by Katsuya E d a (Tokyo) and Kazuhiro K a w a m u r a (Tsukuba) Abstract. For the n-dimensional
More informationGroups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order
Journal of Algebra 219, 625 657 (1999) Article ID jabr.1998.7909, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Groups of Prime Power Order with Derived Subgroup of Prime Order Simon R. Blackburn*
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF THE DOUBLE OF THE FIGURE-EIGHT KNOT EXTERIOR IS GFERF
THE FUNDAMENTAL GROUP OF THE DOUBLE OF THE FIGURE-EIGHT KNOT EXTERIOR IS GFERF D. D. LONG and A. W. REID Abstract We prove that the fundamental group of the double of the figure-eight knot exterior admits
More informationNoncompact homogeneous Einstein manifolds attached to graded Lie algebras
Noncompact homogeneous Einstein manifolds attached to graded Lie algebras Hiroshi Tamaru Department of Mathematics, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8526, JAPAN (e-mail: tamaru@math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp)
More informationGeometry of symmetric R-spaces
Geometry of symmetric R-spaces Makiko Sumi Tanaka Geometry and Analysis on Manifolds A Memorial Symposium for Professor Shoshichi Kobayashi The University of Tokyo May 22 25, 2013 1 Contents 1. Introduction
More informationNotes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem.
Notes 10: Consequences of Eli Cartan s theorem. Version 0.00 with misprints, The are a few obvious, but important consequences of the theorem of Eli Cartan on the maximal tori. The first one is the observation
More informationNorm computation and analytic continuation of holomorphic discrete series
Norm computation and analytic continuation of holomorphic discrete series Ryosuke Nakahama Graduate School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Tokyo Introduction: Holomorphic discrete series of
More informationCONSIDERATION OF COMPACT MINIMAL SURFACES IN 4-DIMENSIONAL FLAT TORI IN TERMS OF DEGENERATE GAUSS MAP
CONSIDERATION OF COMPACT MINIMAL SURFACES IN 4-DIMENSIONAL FLAT TORI IN TERMS OF DEGENERATE GAUSS MAP TOSHIHIRO SHODA Abstract. In this paper, we study a compact minimal surface in a 4-dimensional flat
More informationLifting Smooth Homotopies of Orbit Spaces of Proper Lie Group Actions
Journal of Lie Theory Volume 15 (2005) 447 456 c 2005 Heldermann Verlag Lifting Smooth Homotopies of Orbit Spaces of Proper Lie Group Actions Marja Kankaanrinta Communicated by J. D. Lawson Abstract. By
More informationBRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP
Trends in Mathematics Information Center for Mathematical Sciences Volume 4, Number 1, June 2001, Pages 71 75 BRUHAT-TITS BUILDING OF A p-adic REDUCTIVE GROUP HI-JOON CHAE Abstract. A Bruhat-Tits building
More informationON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS
ON NEARLY SEMIFREE CIRCLE ACTIONS DUSA MCDUFF AND SUSAN TOLMAN Abstract. Recall that an effective circle action is semifree if the stabilizer subgroup of each point is connected. We show that if (M, ω)
More information10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces.
10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces. 10.1. The concept of a Lie subgroup of a Lie group. We have seen that if G is a Lie group and H G a subgroup which is at the same time a
More informationLemma 1.3. The element [X, X] is nonzero.
Math 210C. The remarkable SU(2) Let G be a non-commutative connected compact Lie group, and assume that its rank (i.e., dimension of maximal tori) is 1; equivalently, G is a compact connected Lie group
More informationThe Real Grassmannian Gr(2, 4)
The Real Grassmannian Gr(2, 4) We discuss the topology of the real Grassmannian Gr(2, 4) of 2-planes in R 4 and its double cover Gr + (2, 4) by the Grassmannian of oriented 2-planes They are compact four-manifolds
More informationMath 210C. The representation ring
Math 210C. The representation ring 1. Introduction Let G be a nontrivial connected compact Lie group that is semisimple and simply connected (e.g., SU(n) for n 2, Sp(n) for n 1, or Spin(n) for n 3). Let
More informationThe Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra
The Cartan Decomposition of a Complex Semisimple Lie Algebra Shawn Baland University of Colorado, Boulder November 29, 2007 Definition Let k be a field. A k-algebra is a k-vector space A equipped with
More informationTitle fibring over the circle within a co. Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 42(1)
Title The divisibility in the cut-and-pas fibring over the circle within a co Author(s) Komiya, Katsuhiro Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 42(1) Issue 2005-03 Date Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/11094/9915
More informationBirational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits
arxiv:math/0611129v1 [math.ag] 6 Nov 2006 Birational geometry and deformations of nilpotent orbits Yoshinori Namikawa In order to explain what we want to do in this paper, let us begin with an explicit
More informationClassification of root systems
Classification of root systems September 8, 2017 1 Introduction These notes are an approximate outline of some of the material to be covered on Thursday, April 9; Tuesday, April 14; and Thursday, April
More information1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties
Contents 1 Hermitian symmetric spaces: examples and basic properties 1 1.1 Almost complex manifolds............................................ 1 1.2 Hermitian manifolds................................................
More informationIntersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions
Intersection of stable and unstable manifolds for invariant Morse functions Hitoshi Yamanaka (Osaka City University) March 14, 2011 Hitoshi Yamanaka (Osaka City University) ()Intersection of stable and
More informationHermitian Symmetric Domains
Hermitian Symmetric Domains November 11, 2013 1 The Deligne torus, and Hodge structures Let S be the real algebraic group Res C/R G m. Thus S(R) = C. If V is a finite-dimensional real vector space, the
More informationSELF-EQUIVALENCES OF DIHEDRAL SPHERES
SELF-EQUIVALENCES OF DIHEDRAL SPHERES DAVIDE L. FERRARIO Abstract. Let G be a finite group. The group of homotopy self-equivalences E G (X) of an orthogonal G-sphere X is related to the Burnside ring A(G)
More informationOBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES
OBSTRUCTION TO POSITIVE CURVATURE ON HOMOGENEOUS BUNDLES KRISTOPHER TAPP Abstract. Examples of almost-positively and quasi-positively curved spaces of the form M = H\((G, h) F ) were discovered recently
More informationClifford Algebras and Spin Groups
Clifford Algebras and Spin Groups Math G4344, Spring 2012 We ll now turn from the general theory to examine a specific class class of groups: the orthogonal groups. Recall that O(n, R) is the group of
More informationLECTURE 14: LIE GROUP ACTIONS
LECTURE 14: LIE GROUP ACTIONS 1. Smooth actions Let M be a smooth manifold, Diff(M) the group of diffeomorphisms on M. Definition 1.1. An action of a Lie group G on M is a homomorphism of groups τ : G
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007
arxiv:0711.2128v1 [math.rt] 14 Nov 2007 SUPPORT VARIETIES OF NON-RESTRICTED MODULES OVER LIE ALGEBRAS OF REDUCTIVE GROUPS: CORRIGENDA AND ADDENDA ALEXANDER PREMET J. C. Jantzen informed me that the proof
More informationThe Leech lattice. 1. History.
The Leech lattice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 398, 365-376 (1985) Richard E. Borcherds, University of Cambridge, Department of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, 16 Mill Lane, Cambridge, CB2 1SB,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.rt] 31 Oct 2008
Cartan Helgason theorem, Poisson transform, and Furstenberg Satake compactifications arxiv:0811.0029v1 [math.rt] 31 Oct 2008 Adam Korányi* Abstract The connections between the objects mentioned in the
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.dg] 7 Feb 2007
arxiv:math/0702201v1 [math.dg] 7 Feb 2007 A GEOMETRIC PROOF OF THE KARPELEVICH-MOSTOW S THEOREM ANTONIO J. DI SCALA AND CARLOS OLMOS Abstract. In this paper we give a geometric proof of the Karpelevich
More informationON SL(3,R)-ACTION ON 4-SPHERE
ON SL(3,R)-ACTION ON 4-SPHERE SHINTARÔ KUROKI Abstract. We construct a natural continuous SL(3, R)-action on S 4 which is an extension of the SO(3)-action ψ in [8]. The construction is based on the Kuiper
More informationLECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS. Contents 1. Symplectic toric manifolds 1 2. Delzant s theorem 4 3. Symplectic cut 8
LECTURE 11: SYMPLECTIC TORIC MANIFOLDS Contents 1. Symplectic toric manifolds 1 2. Delzant s theorem 4 3. Symplectic cut 8 1. Symplectic toric manifolds Orbit of torus actions. Recall that in lecture 9
More information7.3 Singular Homology Groups
184 CHAPTER 7. HOMOLOGY THEORY 7.3 Singular Homology Groups 7.3.1 Cycles, Boundaries and Homology Groups We can define the singular p-chains with coefficients in a field K. Furthermore, we can define the
More informationCitation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 49(3)
Title ON POSITIVE QUATERNIONIC KÄHLER MAN WITH b_4=1 Author(s) Kim, Jin Hong; Lee, Hee Kwon Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 49(3) Issue 2012-09 Date Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/11094/23146
More informationTHE CENTRALIZER OF K IN U(g) C(p) FOR THE GROUP SO e (4,1) Ana Prlić University of Zagreb, Croatia
GLASNIK MATEMATIČKI Vol. 5(7)(017), 75 88 THE CENTRALIZER OF K IN U(g) C(p) FOR THE GROUP SO e (4,1) Ana Prlić University of Zagreb, Croatia Abstract. Let G be the Lie group SO e(4,1), with maximal compact
More informationOn Shalom Tao s Non-Quantitative Proof of Gromov s Polynomial Growth Theorem
On Shalom Tao s Non-Quantitative Proof of Gromov s Polynomial Growth Theorem Carlos A. De la Cruz Mengual Geometric Group Theory Seminar, HS 2013, ETH Zürich 13.11.2013 1 Towards the statement of Gromov
More informationNotes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop. Eric Sommers
Notes on nilpotent orbits Computational Theory of Real Reductive Groups Workshop Eric Sommers 17 July 2009 2 Contents 1 Background 5 1.1 Linear algebra......................................... 5 1.1.1
More informationOn the Diffeomorphism Group of S 1 S 2. Allen Hatcher
On the Diffeomorphism Group of S 1 S 2 Allen Hatcher This is a revision, written in December 2003, of a paper of the same title that appeared in the Proceedings of the AMS 83 (1981), 427-430. The main
More informationBackground on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System
Background on Chevalley Groups Constructed from a Root System Paul Tokorcheck Department of Mathematics University of California, Santa Cruz 10 October 2011 Abstract In 1955, Claude Chevalley described
More informationarxiv:math/ v2 [math.cv] 21 Mar 2005
arxiv:math/0502152v2 [math.cv] 21 Mar 2005 Hyperbolic n-dimensional Manifolds with Automorphism Group of Dimension n 2 A. V. Isaev We obtain a complete classification of complex Kobayashi-hyperbolic manifolds
More informationThe Symmetric Space for SL n (R)
The Symmetric Space for SL n (R) Rich Schwartz November 27, 2013 The purpose of these notes is to discuss the symmetric space X on which SL n (R) acts. Here, as usual, SL n (R) denotes the group of n n
More informationSTRUCTURE OF GEODESICS IN A 13-DIMENSIONAL GROUP OF HEISENBERG TYPE
Steps in Differential Geometry, Proceedings of the Colloquium on Differential Geometry, 25 30 July, 2000, Debrecen, Hungary STRUCTURE OF GEODESICS IN A 13-DIMENSIONAL GROUP OF HEISENBERG TYPE Abstract.
More informationMath 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory. Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille
Math 429/581 (Advanced) Group Theory Summary of Definitions, Examples, and Theorems by Stefan Gille 1 2 0. Group Operations 0.1. Definition. Let G be a group and X a set. A (left) operation of G on X is
More informationMic ael Flohr Representation theory of semi-simple Lie algebras: Example su(3) 6. and 20. June 2003
Handout V for the course GROUP THEORY IN PHYSICS Mic ael Flohr Representation theory of semi-simple Lie algebras: Example su(3) 6. and 20. June 2003 GENERALIZING THE HIGHEST WEIGHT PROCEDURE FROM su(2)
More informationClassification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO
UTMS 2011 8 April 22, 2011 Classification of discretely decomposable A q (λ) with respect to reductive symmetric pairs by Toshiyuki Kobayashi and Yoshiki Oshima T UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO GRADUATE SCHOOL OF
More informationON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS
ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF RANK 1 GROUPS OVER NON ARCHIMEDEAN LOCAL FIELDS LISA CARBONE Abstract. We outline the classification of K rank 1 groups over non archimedean local fields K up to strict isogeny,
More informationThe Spinor Representation
The Spinor Representation Math G4344, Spring 2012 As we have seen, the groups Spin(n) have a representation on R n given by identifying v R n as an element of the Clifford algebra C(n) and having g Spin(n)
More informationRoot systems. S. Viswanath
Root systems S. Viswanath 1. (05/07/011) 1.1. Root systems. Let V be a finite dimensional R-vector space. A reflection is a linear map s α,h on V satisfying s α,h (x) = x for all x H and s α,h (α) = α,
More informationSYMMETRIC SUBGROUP ACTIONS ON ISOTROPIC GRASSMANNIANS
1 SYMMETRIC SUBGROUP ACTIONS ON ISOTROPIC GRASSMANNIANS HUAJUN HUANG AND HONGYU HE Abstract. Let G be the group preserving a nondegenerate sesquilinear form B on a vector space V, and H a symmetric subgroup
More informationNotes on quotients and group actions
Notes on quotients and group actions Erik van den Ban Fall 2006 1 Quotients Let X be a topological space, and R an equivalence relation on X. The set of equivalence classes for this relation is denoted
More information