arxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 19 Feb 2018

Transcription

1 Electroweak probes with ALAS arxiv:8.5v [nucl-ex] Feb 8 for the ALAS Coloration eizmann Institute of Science alexander.milov@weizmann.ac.il Measuring electroweak bosons in relativistic heavy ion collisions at high energy provide an opportunity to understand temporal evolution of the quark-gluon plasma created in such collisions by constraining the initial state of the eraction. Due to lack of color charges the bosons and or icles produced in their leptonic decays are unaffected by the quark-gluon plasma and therefore preserve the information about the very early stage of the collision when they were born. his singles electroweak bosons as a unique and very eresting class of observables in heavy ion collisions. he ALAS experiment at LHC measures production of electroweak bosons in pp, p Pb, and Pb Pb collisions systems. A review of the existing results is given in this proceeding that includes studies made with isolated photons to constra kinematic properties and flavour composition of associated jets, measurements of and bosons used to estimate nuclear modification of on distribution function and the production rates of the bosons used to verify geometric models implied to estimate event centrality. A novel analysis on measuring two-icle correlations in pp collisions where the boson is registered is also discussed in the proceeding. his is the first attempt to break o the initial geometry of the pp collisions by constraining the impact parameter with a hard scattering process. It shows that the strength of the two icle correlations in such collision is.8 ±. above the inclusive. o make the measurement ALAS solves the technical problem of measuring the underlying event in high pileup condition. th International orkshop on High-p Physics in the RHIC/LHC Era -5 October, 7 University of Bergen, Bergen, orway Speaker. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-onCommercial-oDerivatives. International License (CC BY-C-D.).

2 Electroweak probes with ALAS. Introduction he heavy ion research program at the LHC opened wide opportunity to study electroweak (E) probes in HI collisions. hese probes carry unique information about the initial stage of HI eractions. he ALAS experiment [] performs measurements with high energy isolated photons,, and bosons.. Energy balance Accurate determination of the photon or -boson momentum allows constraining the energy of the jet produced in the same scattering. As shown in Fig. energetic jets measured in Pb Pb ormalised entries 8 < p < GeV.3 % PbPb,. nb..5 pp, pb PYHIA 8 Overlay < p < 5 GeV ALAS jet p > 5 GeV 5. ev. π / 3π/ φ π π / 3π/ φ π (/ )(d/dx J ) (/ )(d/dx J ) PbPb,. nb pp, pb PYHIA 8 Overlay % x J -3% ALAS < p < 5 GeV 5. ev -% x J x J J J x J 3-5% d jet jet /p ) d(p 3 ALAS PbPb s =.7 ev,l =.5 nb jet jet Anti-k Jet R=.3, p >5, p > GeV, p /p >5/ PYHIA: Mean=.8±. PbPb: Mean=.±.±. -% Centrality Arbitrary Units φ jet p /p Figure : Left panels: jet angular correlations in central Pb Pb collisions. Middle panels jet energy balance in different centralities. Right: jet energy balance in Pb Pb []. collisions at s = 5. ev are found to be produced almost back-to-back with the boson at all centralities. At the same time, their energy balance expressed by the ratio X J strongly depends on centrality as it is also shown in the figure. In central collisions X J distribution loses its characteristic peak seen in peripheral and in the pp collisions, and the mean of the X J distribution diminishes. Analogous measurement can also be performed by ALAS with larger statistical samples using boson jet pairs. he proof of principle measurement at.7 ev is also shown in the figure. Selecting jet produced in pairs with photons allows to tag jet predominantly produced in quark scattering. Figure shows comparison of fragmentation functions of jets associated with photons (/ jet )(d/dz) Ratio to jet.5 ALAS pp, pb, 5. ev, -tagged jets PYHIA 8 A PDF3LO jet, inclusive jet (p = 8 GeV) z z ratio of D(z) ALAS 3-8% PbPb / pp -tagged jets 5. ev inclusive jets.7 ev (3-%) z ratio of D(z) ALAS -3% PbPb / pp -tagged jets 5. ev inclusive jets.7 ev (%) z Figure : Left: fragmentation function measured for tagged and inclusive jets. Middle and right panels: Ratio of fragmentation function measured in mid-central and central Pb Pb to that in peripheral for tagged and inclusive jets [3].

3 7 Electroweak probes with ALAS and the inclusive jets measured in Pb Pb and in pp. In more central collisions shown in the right panel, such jets are modified stronger than in the inclusive collisions at the same centrality. 3. Parton distribution function A unique possibility to reconstruct kinematics of E bosons unaffected by the medium created in HI eractions makes them a perfect observable to measure nuclear modification of on distribution functions (npdf). Measurements performed with boson at two energies are shown in Fig. 3 It shows that the LO calculation based on C PDF [8] and corrected for the LO. ll l d dy events Model /dy [nb] d evt R ALAS PbPb s =.7 ev L =.5 nb Centrality -8% ll Model - PbPb -8% dσ pp /dy dσ /dy LO QCD (C) k LO pp luminosity uncertay ALAS PbPb,. nb pp,.7 pb s, s=5. ev y y [pb] d d evt [pb] d d evt PbPb, s =5. ev,. nb ALAS ν POHEG (C LO) k LO MCFM (EPPS LO) MCFM (nceq5 LO) PbPb, s =5. ev,. nb ALAS - - ν POHEG (C LO) k LO MCFM (EPPS LO) MCFM (nceq5 LO) Lepton Charge Asymmetry A A PbPb s =.7 ev Ldt.-.5 nb ALAS -.3 POHEG C PbPb CEPS PbPb ALAS PbPb, ν s =5. ev,. nb POHEG (C LO) k LO MCFM (EPPS LO) MCFM (nceq5 LO)..5.5 Figure 3: Left panels: rapidity distributions for boson measured in Pb Pb and their ratio to pp model or data. Middle panels: pseudorapidity distribution of muons coming from ± decays in Pb Pb and compared to model calculations. Right panels: boson charge asymmetry [, 5]. l cross section well reproduces the Pb Pb data. However, the npdf modifications using EPS and EPPS or nceq5 [], are also consistent with the data. Higher statistics is required to make an accurate measurement of npdf modification. he lepton charge asymmetry is shown in the right panels. Although it allows some systematic uncertay cancellation, in practice is not more sensitive to npdfs than the rapidity distributions. Results on the measurements of isolated high-p photons in Pb Pb at s =.7 ev made by ALAS are compared to model predictions using npdf as shown in left panels of Fig.. he scaled pp predictions are found to agree well with the data in all centrality and regions, within the stated statistical and systematic uncertaies. give slight preference to the calculation using EPS PDF set. his situation repeats itself also for the p Pb data at s = 8. ev, shown in the right panels, although at high rapidity the modelled dependencies run below the data. his is also true for pp data. In addition to photons, the ALAS experiment makes a comprehensive study of massive the E boson production in p Pb collisions at s = 5. ev. he results are presented in Fig. 5. he comparison of the data for and bosons to the model calculations using the C and EPS sets are shown in the left panels for the two icles respectively. Overall the agreement is

4 Electroweak probes with ALAS Ratio to JEPHOX (pp) Ratio to JEPHOX (pp) %, <.37 Ratio to JEPHOX (pp) -8%,.5 < JEPHOX err. JEPHOX PbPb/ pp JEPHOX EPS/ pp < > uncertay -%, <.37 Photon p Ratio to JEPHOX (pp) -%,.5 < %, <.37 Photon p -%,.5 < Photon p Photon p Photon p Photon p Ratio to JEPHOX (pp).5.5 PbPb %, <.37 Photon p ALAS s =.7 ev L =. nb %,.5 < ALAS 3. < * <. s = 8. ev ppb, nb ALAS 3. < * <. E s = 8. ev ppb, nb E JEPHOX < * <. C C EPPS.83 < * <. I. Vitev et al. no E-loss =.35 GeV, λ q =.35 GeV, λ q E E =.5 fm = fm < * < < * < -. Figure : Left panels: ratios of the photon spectra to model prediction for Pb Pb at different rapidities and centralities. Right panels: photon compared to model predictions [, ]. E E * [nb] dσ( ll)/dy C (LO) CEPS (LO) MS8 (LO) ALAS ppb 3, L = nb s = 5. ev [nb] dσ( ν)/d 8 all centralities C ALAS ppb, 8. nb s = 5. ev..3.. ALAS ppb 3, nb pp 5,.7 pb s = 5. ev /Model. / C (LO) / CEPS (LO) / MS8 (LO) - y * data/model A..8.. C l..8, statistical uncertay, systematic uncertay.7 Luminosity uncertay MC Simulation y Figure 5: Left panels: rapidity distributions for boson measured in p Pb compared to models. Middle panels: pseudorapidity distribution of muons coming from ± measured in p Pb decays compared to model calculations. Right panels: boson [ ]. good, with a slight preference to the EPS set, however, there is a clear trend in the data that it is higher than the model predictions on the left (Pb-fragmenting) side of distributions. his is true for both measured species. he effect is also somewhat larger in central p Pb collisions, whereas in peripheral the data are consistent with the calculations. he preliminary result on the -boson shown in the right panel of the figure suggests that the misbalance seen in the ratios with models is rather a deficit on the p-fragmentation side than an excess on the Pb-fragmentation side. A more detailed study is needed to get an answer to this question.. Initial state geometry in A A A unique opportunity provided by E bosons is the possibility to study the initial collision geometry. For the first time, the binary scaling in HI collisions was demonstrated with high accuracy using the bosons at the LHC [] and later confirmed with other measurements [5]. his is shown with the and bosons in Fig. as a ratio of yields divided by the number of binary collisions ( coll ) estimated using Glauber model []. he dependencies remain flat at all centralities at both measured s. ith increasing statistics of the HI samples it becomes possible to reduce both statistical and systematic uncertaies to a level that is smaller than the uncertaies of 3

5 3 3 Electroweak probes with ALAS ll y <.5 events coll ALAS PbPb s =.7 ev L =.5 nb All p p <GeV <p <3GeV p >3GeV ee ll 3 y <.5 [nb] evt R data (statistical uncertay) systematic uncertay uncertay dσ pp /dy dσ /dy LO QCD (C) k LO pp luminosity uncertay ALAS PbPb,. nb pp,.7 pb s, s=5. ev 3 fiducial events coll ALAS ± ± POHEG C Ldt.-.5 nb PbPb s =.7 ev [nb] evt ν ALAS PbPb, ν s =5. ev,. nb : POHEG (C LO) klo - : POHEG (C LO) klo 3 Figure : Left panels: boson yields in Pb Pb divided by coll measured at two different s. Right panels: analogues values for boson [, 5]. the centrality determination. he results open opportunity to complement the nuclear modification factors based on Glauber model, with a model-independent double ratio of the production rates of any observable in the A A collision system to the pp to the same ratio of the E bosons. Interpretation of measured results on the accuracy to which the initial state geometry is understood is very evident in the p Pb data at s = 5. ev. Shown in the left two panels of Fig. 7 are the production rates of and bosons as a function of centrality in p Pb collisions scaled by coll. he measurements are performed for the Glauber model (top panels) and for the evt - ALAS ppb 3, L 8 Glauber (ωσ=) - 8 GGCF ωσ=. coll 8 = nb s -3.<y *<. coll Uncertay (o Bias Correction) C (LO) = 5. ev 3-3 GGCF ωσ=. 3 coll ppb,mb Glauber (ω σ=) GGCF ω σ=. C ALAS ppb 3, 8. nb s, o Bias Correction Uncertay coll = 5. ev GGCF ω σ=. 3 /d) ch *)/(d /dy (d.8.. Glauber (ω σ =) GGCF ω σ =. GGCF ω σ =. a ( )/ ALAS ppb 3, L = nb s = 5. ev Figure 7: Left two panels: and boson yields in p Pb divided by coll. Right panel: -boson yield per charged icle [, 3]. two sets of parameters in the colour charge fluctuations models [7] (lower panels). Given present uncertaies, only the lower panel can be disfavoured by the data, but with the increased statistics of the p Pb data sample a more accurate conclusion can be made about the models. shown in the panels with open and closed markers are derived with and without the centrality bias correction which is based on Ref. [5]. Use of this correction is needed to get the correct shape of the curves, but it brings to the experimental measurement additional assumptions and uncertaies, which can be avoided in double ratios. Another look at the geometric quantities in p Pb collisions is shown in the right panel of Fig. 7, where -boson production is compared with the rate of inclusive hadron production. According to the coll scaling, the ratio follows ( )/, since in p Pb collisions proton contributes one count to = coll. he curve is consistent with the data. 5. Impact parameter in pp Special attention in recent years is paid to the small systems. Observation of the long-range

6 Electroweak probes with ALAS correlations in pp and p Pb systems suggests that the QGP-like effects can be formed in small systems. o prove or disprove this concept more experimental measurements are required. Also needed is the control over pp system size that is currently done by the final state charged multiplicity. All existing data show weak or no dependence of the long-range correlation magnitude on multiplicity. Some theoretical predictions suggest that the initial state geometry is not necessarily correlated with the charged icle multiplicity and therefore a different approach is required to constrain the geometry [7]. Measurement done in ALAS takes as an assumption that the impact parameter of the collision of events with registered boson on average is smaller than in inclusive events. o obtain statistically significant boson sample for measuring correlations, the entire s = 8 ev pp data with. fb is used. hese data, taken at nominal LHC luminosity, contains significant pileup of about eraction per bunch crossing. he analysis uses novel procedure developed by ALAS []. he pileup is rejected by selecting only those icle whose track is compatible with the boson vertex. he contribution of the residual pileup is evaluated and subtracted using mixed event technique. Unlike in many previous studies, in this analysis, a sample of the mixed event is produced such that mixed events have parameters distributions, such as multiplicity, kinematics, and correlations identical to the pileup. hese events are constructed by selecting tracks found in data event i, in a vicinity of the boson vertex position measured in data event j, where events i j are recorded at the same instantaneous luminosity. More procedure details are given in Ref. []. his data-driven approach produces distributions shown in Fig. 8. Left and right panels show direct and mixed events respectively that direct P(n direct trk ) P( ). ALAS pp, s=8ev,.fb mixed ) P(. < ν < ν 8.. < ν.5.5 < ν < ν < ν.. < ν.5 all ν direct n direct mixed trk Figure 8: Left: Distributions of the number of charged icle tracks measured in the data. Right: same for mixed events, equivalent to the pileup. Colours correspond to different average numbers of pileup tracks, grey color shows complementary inclusive distribution []. are categorized by the parameter ν, the average number of pileup tracks in the sample. Analysis of the two icle correlations is then done independently in each category of ν for different combinations of track pairs: two direct tracks, two mixed tracks from the same event, and also for pairs of tracks from direct and mixed events and from two different mixed events. he two latter contributions, by definition, contain no correlation, however proper accounting of all ial contributions allows deriving the final answer shown in Fig.. he ratio of the v in events with bosons to inclusive is.8 ±., which also is the first HI results measured with full LHC luminosity data. 5

7 Electroweak probes with ALAS v..5 ALAS emplate Fits pp, s=8 ev,.fb 8 ev -tagged 5 ev inclusive 3 ev inclusive.< <5. a,b.5<p <5. GeV 8 signal ratio to 3 ev inclusive.. v.8 ALAS emplate Fits pp, s=8 ev,.fb 8 ev -tagged.< <5. a,b.5<p <5. GeV 8 signal Figure : Left: Distributions of the number of charged icle tracks measured in the data. Right: same for mixed events, equivalent to the pileup. Colours correspond to different average numbers of pileup tracks, grey color shows complementary inclusive distribution []. his research is supported by the Israel Science Foundation (grant 5/5), Israeli Committee for High Energy (grant IASAH-77), and by the MIERVA Stiftung with the funds from the BMBF of the Federal Republic of Germany. References [] ALAS Coloration, 8 JIS 3 S83. [] ALAS Coloration, ALAS-COF-, ALAS-COF-. [3] ALAS Coloration, ALAS-COF-7-7. [] ALAS Coloration, PRL, 3 (3). [5] ALAS Coloration, ALAS-COF-7-, ALAS Coloration, ALAS-COF-7-7, ALAS Coloration, EPJC (5) 75:3. [] M. L. Miller, K. Reygers, S. J. Sanders, and P. Steinberg, ARPS 57 (7) 5-3. [7] H. Heiselberg, G. Baym, B. Blaettel, L. Frankfurt, and M. Strikman, PRL7 () -. B. Blaettel, G. Baym, L. Frankfurt, H. Heiselberg, and M. Strikman, PRD7 (3) V. Guzey and M. Strikman, PLB33 () 5-5. M. Alvioli and M. Strikman, PLB7 (3) [8] H.-L. Lai et al., Phys. Rev. D 8 () 7. [] H. Paukkunen and C. A. Salgado, JHEP 3 () 7. K. J. Eskola, P. Paakkinen, H. Paukkunen and C. A. Salgado, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (7) 3. K. Kovarik et al., Phys. Rev. D 3 () [] ALAS Coloration, PRC3 () 3. [] ALAS Coloration, ALAS-COF-7-7. [] ALAS Coloration, PRC, 5 (5). [3] ALAS Coloration, ALAS-COF-5-5. [] ALAS Coloration, ALAS-COF-7. [5] D. V. Perepelitsa and P. A. Steinberg, arxiv:.7. [] ALAS Coloration, ALAS-COF-7-8. [7] K. elsh, J. Singer, and U.. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C ().