arxiv:hep-th/ v1 20 Oct 1993

Transcription

1 ISAS/EP/93/167 Two-point Correlation Function in Integrable QFT with Anti-Crossing Symmetry arxiv:hep-th/ v1 0 Oct 1993 G. Delfino and G. Mussardo International School for Advanced Studies, and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare 301 Trieste, Italy Abstract The two-point correlation function of the stress-energy tensor for the Φ 1,3 massive deformation of the non-unitary model M 3, is computed. We compare the ultraviolet CFT perturbative expansion of this correlation function with its spectral representation given by a summation over matrix elements of the intermediate asymptotic massive particles. The fast rate of convergence of both approaches provides an explicit example of an accurate interpolation between the infrared and ultraviolet behaviours of a Quantum Field Theory. PACS numbers: 03.70, 0.0+q.

2 In order to understand the structure of -D Quantum Field Theories, the choice of a significant and simple model is an essential step. In this respect, the massless non-unitary minimal models of CFT are the ideal theoretical playgrounds: they give rise to interesting examples of consistent QFT with a relative small number of primary fields which close an OPE algebra [1, ]. There is however a price to be paid for this simplification. In fact, properties taken for granted in a QFT, such as the positivity norm of the states in the Hilbert space, are no longer guaranteed for these models. The massive theories originating from deformations of such CFT may also require a generalization of the axioms of QFT to handle apparently paradoxical situations [3,,, 6]. In this paper we address the problem of computing the correlation function of the stress-energy tensor for the ϕ massive deformation of the non-unitary conformal model M 3, described by the action A = A CFT iλ ϕ(xd x. The important CFT data of this model is collected in Tables 1 and. The presence of i in the action reflects the non-unitary features of the model. With respectto thekac-table andthefusionrulesof theconformal point, thefieldϕis aφ 1,3 operator, even under a Z symmetry, with conformal weight ϕ = 1/. With regard to the massive phase, the corresponding theory is integrable [, 10] and the spectrum is given by one Z odd particle A in bootstrap interaction [7]. The mass m of the particle A may be expressed in terms of the coupling constant as λ = ( m 8/ [11]. The two-particle elastic S-matrix is given by S(β = i tanh 1 ( β i π [], where β is the rapidity variable. S(β presents no poles in the physical sheet and therefore no additional bound states are created. The unusual properties of the above elastic scattering amplitude are its anti-crossing symmetry, S(β = S(iπ β and its asymptotic limits lim β ± S(β = i. The former property implies that for the charge conjugation C of the particle A we have C = 1 and the completeness relation is given by [9] 1 = (i n n >< n (1 n=0 The latter property illustrates that particle A satisfies the generalized statistics of a spin 1/ particle [8]. Although these are on-shell properties, they have far-reaching consequences for the off-shell behaviour of the model. Let us consider the off-critical correlation function G(x = Θ(xΘ(0, where Θ(x is the trace of the stress-energy tensor given by Θ(x = πλ( ϕ ϕ(x. Inserting the completeness relation (1 and taking into account the fact that the matrix elements with an odd number of external particles are zero, which is due to the Z even parity of the operator Θ(x, we obtain the following representation for G(x ( G(x = ( 1 n dβ1...dβ n n (n!(π n < 0 Θ(0 β 1,...,β n > exp mr coshβ i n=0 i=1, ( where r denotes the radial distance, i.e. r = x 0 +x 1. To compute the Form Factors F n (β 1,...,β n < 0 Θ(0 β 1,...,β n >, we have to solve the functional system of equations [1, 13] F n (β 1,...,β i,β i+1,...,β n = F n (β 1,...,β i+1,β i,...,β n S(β i β i+1, (3 F n (β 1 +πi,...,β n 1,β n = ( 1 n+1 F n (β,...,β n,β 1. 1

3 Thepresence of kinematical poles located at β i β j = iπ in the matrix elements F n (β 1,...,β n give rise to the residue conditions i lim( β βf n+ ( β +iπ,β,β 1,β,...,β n = β β ( n 1 ( 1 n S(β β i F n (β 1,...,β n. To find the solution of the functional and recursive equations (3 and (, the first step is to solve the simplest system F (β = S(βF ( β, F (iπ β = F (iπ +β. Let F min (β be the solution of ( with no poles and zeros in the physical sheet. Explicitly, F min (β = N sinh β k=0 Γ ( Γ i=1 k+ 3 ˆβ +i π ( k+ ˆβ +iπ (ˆβ = iπ β, where we choose the normalization constant N such that F min (iπ = 1, i.e. N = i( π 1/ exp(g/π, where G is Catalan s constant. F min (β satisfies the functional equation F min (β +iπf min (β = π sinhβ N sinh 1 and for large values of β behaves as F min (β Ξ exp [ β iπ ( β +i π ( ( (6, (7 ], where Ξ = i N π. The general parameterization of the Form Factors which takes into account the kinematical poles is given by F n (β 1,...,β n = H n Q n (x 1,...,x n i<j F min (β ij x i +x j, (8 where H n are normalization constants, Q n (x 1,...,x n symmetric functions of x 1,...,x n and x i = e β i. SinceΘ(x is ascalar operator, the total order of Q n (x 1,...,x n is equal to n(n 1. By using the residue conditions ( and the functional equation (7, we obtain for the Q n s the recursive equations Q n+ ( x,x,x 1,...,x n = x n+1 σ n (x 1,...,x n D n (x x 1,...,x n Q n (x 1,...,x n, (9 where D n (x x 1,...,x n = n k=0 sin πk xn k σ k (x 1,...,x n. (10 σ k (x 1,...,x n (k = 0,1,...n are the elementary symmetric polynomials in n-variables [1]. In writing eq.(9, we chose the normalization constants such that H n+ = ( πn / n Hn. H is fixed by the normalization of the energy operator < β Θ(0 β >= πm. The solution of the recursive equations (9 is given by Q n (x 1,...,x n = σ 1 σ n 1 (σ n n 1 P n (x 1,...,x n, (11

4 where P n = { (σ1 1 if n = 1, ( 1 n deta kj n. A kj is a (n (n matrix with entries A kj = σ j k+1. The proof of (11 employs the properties of determinants and the recursive equations σ k ( x,x,x 1,...,x n = σ k (x 1,...,x n x σ k (x 1,...,x n satisfied by the elementary symmetric polynomials. For n = 0 one also recovers the vacuum expectation value < 0 Θ(0 0 >= πm obtained from the TBA [11]. By extracting CFT data directly from the massive phase of the model an important check of the validity of our solution (1 and of the fast rate of convergence of the series ( is made. A relevant quantity is the central charge of the original M 3, model, c = 3, which can be obtained from the correlator < Θ(xΘ(0 > in terms of the c-theorem sum rule [1] c = 3 π (1 x < Θ(xΘ(0 > d x. (13 Using the spectral representation ( and keeping only the two-particle contribution, we get for the previous quantity the approximate value c = Including also the four-particle contribution, the resulting estimate c = becomes very close to the exact value. As clarified in [16], such fast convergence is due to the softening of the multi-particle branch cuts. The remarkable convergence of the series also extends to the very short distance region of the correlation function and allows us to probe its ultraviolet behaviour. This can be seen directly by comparing the short-distance values of G(r with the perturbative series based on the operator product ϕ(rϕ(0 = C I ϕϕ(ri + C ϕ ϕϕ(rϕ(0 + (1 where the off-critical structure constants have the following regular expansion in λ [17] C I ϕϕ(r = r / (1 iλr 8/ Q 1 + C ϕ ϕϕ (r = r / (C ϕ ϕϕ iλr8/ Q + (1 C ϕ ϕϕ can be found in Table and the first coefficients are given by Q 1 = < ϕ(yϕ(1ϕ(0 >CFT d y, (16 Q = < ϕ( ϕ(yϕ(1ϕ(0 >CFT d y. The prime on the integrals denotes a regularization with respect to the infrared divergencies. Q 1 can be computed exactly Q 1 = C ϕ ϕϕ tan ( π Γ ( Γ( 8. (17 On the other hand, Q has been computed numerically. Combining the null-vector conditions at levels 3 and satisfied by the operator ϕ [1, 18], the -point conformal correlation function < ϕ( ϕ(x,xϕ(1ϕ(0 > CFT = x(1 x 1/ F(x,x (18 3

5 satisfies the second-order differential equation x (1 x (x x+1f (x x(1 x(6x 3 9x +11x F (x+ (19 + (39x 78x x 78x+1F(x = 0 (analogously for x. The solutions of this differential equation can be expressed in power series in the annuluses around the singular points x = 0 and x = and in each of such domain combined into a monodromy invariant combination. The numerical integration of (16 gives for the finite part of the integral the value Q = 1.8±0.01. Using the relationship between Θ and ϕ and the vacuum expectation value of Θ, the short-distance perturbative expansion is given by ( 16 [ G(r = πλ 1 iλq 1 r 8/] r / + (0 16 iλπ m [ C ϕ ϕϕ iλq r 8/] r / +O ((mr 1/ As it is evident from figs.1 and the first Form Factors are able to reproduce with high accuracy the ultraviolet behaviour of the function, following very closely its power law singularities at short-distance scales. At the same time, it is worth noticing that the first order correction in λ of the OPE is also sufficient to obtain reasonable matching with the spectral representation of G(r at intermediate scales (see fig.1. It would also be interesting to extend our analysis to the correlation functions of other fields of the theory and see which kind of constraints are induced by the OPE of the conformal point in the massive regime. The fast rate of convergence of both infrared and ultraviolet expansions presented in this paper would appear to be quite an important characteristic of integrable models and as such should be taken into account for further developments in the studies of QFT. Acknowledgements. We are grateful to A. Schwimmer and P. Simonetti for useful discussions. References [1] A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B 1 (198, 333. [] J.L. Cardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. (198, 13. [3] J.L. Cardy, G. Mussardo, Phys. Lett. B (1989, 7. [] F.A. Smirnov, Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1989, 16; Int. J. Mod. Phys. A (1989, 13. [] N. Reshetikhin and F. Smirnov, Commun. Math. Phys. 131 (1990, 17. [6] G. Mussardo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 7 (199, 07. [7] Asdiscussedinref.[]andconfirmedinref.[6], themodelpresentsaz spontaneoussymmetrybreakinganditisverysimilarinmanyrespectstotheisingmodelinthelowtemperature

6 phase. The actual spectrum consists in two kink excitations above a doubly degenerate vacuum. Since the internal degree of freedom of the kink excitations are frozen, they behave as a single particle A but with the unusual features discussed in the text. [8] A. Swieca, Fortschr. Phys. (1977, 303; M. Karowski and H.J. Thun, Nucl. Phys. B 190 (1981, 61; F.A. Smirnov, Commun. Math. Phys. 13 (1990, 1. [9] A simple way to obtain this equation is to generalize the argument of ref.[3], taking into account the fact that the two-particle state AA > is created by the operator ϕ (see fig. of ref.[6]. [10] A.B. Zamolodchikov, in Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics 19 (1989, 61; Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 3 (1988, 73. [11] P. Christe and M.J. Martins, Mod. Phys. Lett. A (1990, 189. [1] B. Berg, M. Karowski, P. Weisz, Phys. Rev. D 19 (1979, 77; M. Karowski, P. Weisz, Nucl. Phys. B 139 (1978, ; M. Karowski, Phys. Rep. 9 (1979, 9; [13] F.A. Smirnov, Form Factors in Completely Integrable Models of Quantum Field Theory (World Scientific 199, and references therein; A.N. Kirillov and F.A. Smirnov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 3 (1988, 731; A.N. Kirillov and F.A. Smirnov, Phys. Lett. B 198 (1987, 06. [1] I.G. MacDonald, Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1979 [1] A.B. Zamolodchikov, JETP Lett. 3 (1986, 730; J.L. Cardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988, 709. [16] J.L. Cardy and G. Mussardo, Universal Properties of Self-Avoiding Walks from Two- Dimensional Field Theory, UCSBTH-93-1, ISAS-93-7, to appear on Nucl. Phys. B. [17] Al.B. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B 38 (1991, 619. [18] M.P. Mattis, Nucl. Phys. B 8 (1987, 671.

7 I = Φ 0, σ = Φ 1 1 ϕ = Φ1,1 3 0 ψ =Φ3,3 0, 1 0 Table 1 - Kac table and operator content of the model M 3,. σ σ = [I]+Cσσ ϕ [ϕ] Cϕ σσ = i Γ ( Γ( 6 Γ( σ ϕ = C ϕ σσ [σ]+c ψ σϕ [ψ] C ϕ ϕϕ = i ϕ ϕ = [I]+C ϕ ϕϕ [ϕ] C ψ σϕ = 1 ψ ψ = [I] ( sin( π sin( π Γ ( 1 Γ( 6 Γ( sin( π sin( π Table - Fusion Rules and structure constants of the model M 3,. 6

8 Figure Captions Figure 1. Two-point correlation function G versus scaling distance mr. Dashed line: zeroorder short distance expansion. Full line: first order corrected short distance expansion. Dotted line: large distance expansion with up to four-particle contribution. Figure. Two-point correlation function G versus scaling distance mr in the deep ultraviolet region. Dashed line: large distance expansion with up to two-particle contribution. Dotted line: large distance expansion with up to four-particle contribution. Full line: first order corrected short distance expansion. 7

9 Figure 1 8

10 Figure 9