Global Strichartz Estimates for Solutions of the Wave Equation Exterior to a Convex Obstacle
|
|
- Clifford Harrington
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Global Strichartz Estimates for Solutions of the Wave Equation Exterior to a Convex Obstacle by Jason L. Metcalfe A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Baltimore, Maryland May, 3. c Jason L. Metcalfe All rights reserved.
2 ABSTRACT In this thesis, we show that certain local Strichartz estimates for solutions of the wave equation exterior to a convex obstacle can be extended to estimates that are global in both space and time. This extends the work that was done previously by H. Smith and C. Sogge in odd spatial dimensions. In order to prove the global estimates, we explore weighted Strichartz estimates for solutions of the wave equation when the Cauchy data and forcing term are compactly supported. Advisor: Dr. Christopher Sogge Readers: Dr. Christopher Sogge, Dr. Richard Wentworth ii
3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to dedicate this work to my wife, Stephanie. Her unwavering love, friendship, support, and patience were the inspiration for this endeavor, and I cannot thank her enough for never losing confidence, even at times when I had. I would like to thank Dr. Christopher Sogge for his guidance and patience during this study. This project would not have been possible were it not for his vision and his generous assistance. Additionally, I would like to thank the professors at Johns Hopkins University, the University of Washington, and the University of Dayton for their tireless efforts in teaching mathematics and fostering my interest in this beautiful subject. I would also like to extend my gratitude to my fellow graduate students at Johns Hopkins University for their friendship and for the numerous conversations that were of great assistance on this project and several others. Finally, I would like to thank my friends and family. I am never certain that I am deserving of such support and generosity. iii
4 Contents 1 Introduction 1 Energy Estimates 4.1 Homogeneous Sobolev Spaces Local Energy Decay Weighted Minkowski Estimates Weighted Energy Estimates Weighted Dispersive Inequality Weighted Strichartz Estimates Mixed Estimates in Minkowski Space 3 5 Strichartz Estimates in the Exterior Domain 8 iv
5 1 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to show that certain local Strichartz estimates for solutions to the wave equation exterior to a nontrapping obstacle can be extended to estimates that are global in both space and time. In [3], Smith and Sogge proved this result for odd spatial dimensions n 3. Here, we extend this result to all spatial dimensions n. If Ω is the exterior domain in R n to a compact obstacle and n is an even integer, we are looking at solutions to the following wave equation u(t, x = t u(t, x u(t, x = F (t, x, (t, x R Ω, u(, x = f(x Ḣγ D (Ω, t u(, x = g(x Ḣγ 1 D (Ω, u(t, x =, x Ω. (1.1 Here Ω is the complement in R n to a compact set contained in { x R} with C boundary. Moreover, Ω is nontrapping in the sense that there is a T R such that no geodesic of length T R is completely contained in { x R} Ω. The case Ω = R n is permitted. We say that 1 r, s p, q and γ are admissible if the following two estimates hold. Local Strichartz estimates. For f, g, F (t, supported in { x R}, solutions to (1.1 satisfy u L p t Lq x([,1] Ω + sup t 1 u(t, Ḣγ D (Ω + sup t 1 t u(t, Ḣγ 1 D (Ω C ( f Ḣγ D (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 (Ω + F L r t Ls x([,1] Ω. (1. Global Minkowski Strichartz estimates. In the case of Ω = R n, solutions to (1.1 satisfy D u L p t Lq x(r 1+n + sup u(t, Ḣγ (R n + sup t u(t, Ḣγ 1 (R n t t C ( f Ḣγ (R n + g Ḣ γ 1 (R n + F L r t Ls x (R1+n. (1.3 1
6 Additionally, for technical reasons we need to assume > r. If n =, we must also assume q >. The global Minkowski Strichartz estimate (1.3 is a generalization of the work of Strichartz [3, 31]. The local Strichartz estimates (1. for solutions to the homogeneous (F = wave equation in a domain exterior to a convex obstacle were established by Smith and Sogge in [4]. In [3], Smith and Sogge demonstrated that a lemma of Christ and Kiselev [6] (see also [3] for a proof could be used to establish local estimates for solutions to the nonhomogeneous problem. While the arguments that follow are valid in any domain exterior to a nontrapping obstacle, it is not currently known whether the local Strichartz estimates (1. hold if the obstacle is not convex. Related eigenfunction estimates are, however, known to fail if Ω has a point of convexity. We note here that p, q, r, s, γ are admissible in the above sense if the obstacle is convex, n 3, 1 p = q, s < ( n 1 (n 1 n 3 ; 1 p + n q = n γ = 1 r + n s ( 1 1 ; q 1 r = ( n 1 ( 1 1 s where r, s represent the conjugate exponents to r, s respectively. In particular, notice that we have admissibility in the conformal case p, q = (n + 1 (n + 1 ; r, s = n 1 n + 3 ; γ = 1. Additionally, we note that it is well-known (see, e.g., [13] that in the homogeneous case (F = the Global Minkowski Strichartz estimate (1.3 holds if and only if n, p, q <, γ = n n q 1 p, and p n 1 ( 1 q Thus, (1.4 provides a necessary condition for admissibility. (1.4 The main result of this paper states that for such a set of indices a similar global estimate holds for solutions to the wave equation in the exterior domain.
7 Theorem 1.1. If p, q, r, s, γ are admissible and u is a solution to the Cauchy problem (1.1, then u L p t Lq x(r Ω C ( f Ḣγ D (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 (Ω + F L r t Ls x(r Ω. The key differences between this case and the odd dimensional case are the lack of strong Huygens principle and the fact that the local energy no longer decays exponentially. Local energy decay and the homogeneous Sobolev spaces Ḣγ D (Ω will be discussed in more detail in the next section. At the final stage of preparation, we learned that N. Burq [4] has independently obtained the results from this paper using a slightly different method. D 3
8 Energy Estimates.1 Homogeneous Sobolev Spaces We begin here with a few notes on the homogeneous Sobolev spaces Ḣγ D (Ω. Fixing a smooth cutoff function β C c are able to define such that β(x 1 for x R, for γ < n/, we f Ḣγ D (Ω = βf Ḣ γ D ( Ω + (1 βf Ḣ γ (R n where Ω is a compact manifold with boundary containing B R = Ω { x R}. In particular, notice that for functions (or distributions supported in { x R}, we have f Ḣγ D (Ω = f Ḣ γ D ( Ω. The homogeneous Sobolev norms, Ḣ γ (R n, are given by f Ḣγ (R n = ( γ f L (R n. For functions supported on a fixed compact set, the homogeneous Sobolev spaces Ḣ γ (R n are comparable to the inhomogeneous Sobolev spaces H γ (R n. In particular, for r < s and for f compactly supported, we have f Ḣr (R n C f Ḣ s (R n. Functions f Ḣγ D ( Ω satisfy the Dirichlet condition f Ω = (when this makes sense. Additionally, when γ, we must require the extra compatibility condition j f Ω = for j γ. Since in this paper, we always have γ 1 1 the additional compatibility conditions are irrelevant for γ <. With the Dirichlet condition fixed, we may define the spaces Ḣγ D ( Ω in terms of eigenfunctions of. Since Ω is compact, we have an orthonormal basis of L ( Ω, {u j } H 1 D (M C (M with u j = λ j u j where < λ j. Thus, for γ, it is natural to define Ḣ γ D ( Ω = { v L ( Ω : j ˆv(j λ γ j < } where ˆv(j = (v, u j. The Ḣγ D ( Ω norm is given by v Ḣ γ D ( Ω = j ˆv(j λ γ j. 4
9 Defining Ḣγ D ( Ω for γ < in terms of duality, it is not difficult to see that the above characterization for the norm also holds for negative γ. Additionally, we mention that v = ḢD 1 ( Ω v L ( Ω and for r < s, v Ḣ r D ( Ω C v Ḣ s D ( Ω. See, e.g., [33] for further details. Let f Ḣγ (Ω = ( γ f L (Ω for γ (as in [4], and define f Ḣ γ (Ω via duality. Suppose f is supported in { x R}. Since ( γ f L ( Ω ( γ f L (Ω ( γ f L (R n, it follows easily that for a distribution g supported in { x R}, and for γ. g Ḣ γ (Ω g Ḣ γ D g Ḣ γ (R n g Ḣ γ D In order to prove the analogous inequalities for need the following proposition. ( Ω = g Ḣ γ D (Ω ( Ω = g Ḣ γ D (Ω Ḣ γ spaces with γ, we will Proposition.1. For Ω, Ω as above, γ, there exist extension operators E Ω,R n, E Ω,Ω such that if f Ḣγ D ( Ω, E Ω,R nf = E Ω,Ω f = f in Ω E Ω,R nf Ḣγ (R n C f Ḣ γ D ( Ω E Ω,Ω f Ḣγ (Ω C f Ḣ γ D ( Ω Moreover, if f vanishes in a neighborhood of Ω, then E Ω,R nf(x = E Ω,Ω f(x = for x Ω. For γ integral, this result follows from Calderon [5] (Theorem 1. The result for non-integral γ then follows via complex interpolation. 5
10 . Local Energy Decay One of the key results that will allow us to establish the global estimates from the local estimates and the global Minkowski estimates is local energy decay. It is this result that requires the nontrapping assumption on the obstacle. In odd dimensions, we are able to get exponential energy decay: see Taylor [3], Lax-Philips [14], Vainberg [34], Morawetz-Ralston-Strauss [], Strauss [9], and Morawetz [17, 19]. In even spatial dimensions, the decay is significantly less. The version that we will use in this paper is Local energy decay. For n even, data f, g supported in { x R}, γ < n, and β(x smooth, supported in { x R}, there exist C < such that for solutions to (1.1 where F = the following holds ( βu(t, Ḣγ D (Ω + β tu(t, Ḣγ 1 D (Ω C t n/ f Ḣγ D (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω. (.1 This is a generalized version of the results of Melrose [16] (n 4 and Morawetz [17] (n =. Before showing how we can derive this generalized version of local energy decay, we would like to mention here the works of Ralston [1] and Strauss [9]. Proof of Equation (.1. By density, we may, without loss of generality, assume that f, g are C. When n is even, Melrose [16] (n 4 and Morawetz [17] (n = were able to show that a solution to the homogeneous (F = Cauchy problem (1.1 outside a nontrapping obstacle with data f, g supported in { x R} must satisfy ( u(t, x dx + ( t u(t, x dx Ct n f dx + g dx (. B R B R where B R = { x R} Ω. Let g be the solution of g(x = g(x g(x = in { x R} Ω on { x = R} Ω and extend g to all of Ω by setting it to outside { x R}. Let v be the solution 6
11 to the Cauchy problem v(t, x = v(, x = g(x t v(, x = f(x v(t, x =, x Ω. By (., we have t v(t, L (B R Ct n/ ( g Ḣ1 D ( Ω + f L ( Ω (.3 We claim that u = t v. Indeed, since [, t ] =, we have t v(t, x = t v(, x = f(x t ( t v(, x = t v(, x = v(, x = g(x = g(x t v(t, x =, x Ω. Thus, by the uniqueness of solutions to the Cauchy problem, we have that u = t v and (.3 yields u(t, L (B R = t v(t, L (B R Ct n/ ( g Ḣ1 D ( Ω + f L ( Ω = Ct n/ ( g Ḣ 1 D = Ct n/ ( g Ḣ 1 D ( Ω + f L ( Ω ( Ω + f L ( Ω Ct n/ ( f Ḣ1 D ( Ω + g L ( Ω Since j (βu = β j u + βu j, the above calculation and (. yield β( u(t, Ḣ1 D ( Ω + β( tu(t, L ( Ω Ct n/ ( f Ḣ1 D ( Ω + g L ( Ω (.4 Letting v and g be as above, (.4 gives β( v(t, Ḣ1 D ( Ω + β( tv(t, L ( g Ḣ1 ( Ω Ct n/ D ( Ω + f L ( Ω (.5 Ct ( g Ḣ 1 n/ D ( Ω + f L ( Ω 7
12 Since u = t v, we have Since, also, β t u(t, Ḣ 1 D ( Ω + β( u(t, L ( Ω = β( t v Ḣ 1 D ( Ω + β( tv(t, L ( Ω = β( v(t, Ḣ 1 ( Ω + β( tv(t, L ( Ω. β( v(t, Ḣ 1 D ( Ω β( v(t, Ḣ 1 D ( Ω + ( β( v(t, Ḣ 1 D ( Ω + j β j ( j v(t, Ḣ 1 D ( Ω β( v(t, Ḣ1 D ( Ω + ( β( v(t, ḢD 1 ( Ω + ( j (β j ( v(t, Ḣ 1 D ( Ω + β jj( v(t, Ḣ 1 D j ( Ω β( v(t, Ḣ1 D ( Ω + ( β( v(t, ḢD 1 ( Ω + ( β j ( v(t, Ḣ1 D ( Ω + β jj( v(t, Ḣ1 D ( Ω, j (.5 yields ( β( u(t, L ( Ω + β( tu(t, Ḣ 1 D ( Ω Ct n/ f L ( Ω + g Ḣ 1 D Since [, t ] = and t condition, we have that u t (t, x is a solution of ( Ω. (.6 preserves the support of the data and the boundary u t (t, x =, (t, x R Ω, u t (, x = g(x, t u t (, x = f(x, u(t, x =, x Ω. Thus, by (.4 and the fact that u =, we have β( u t (t, Ḣ1 D ( Ω + β( u(t, L ( Ω = β( u t (t, Ḣ1 D ( Ω + β( u tt(t, L ( Ω Ct ( g Ḣ1 n/ D ( Ω + f L ( Ω = Ct ( g Ḣ1 n/ D ( Ω + f ḢD ( Ω. (.7 8
13 Since β( u(t, Ḣ D ( Ω ( β( u(t, L ( Ω + β( u(t, L ( Ω + j β j ( j u(t, L ( Ω ( β( u(t, L ( Ω + β( u(t, L ( Ω + ( β j ( u(t, Ḣ1 D ( Ω + β jj( u(t, L ( Ω, j (.4,(.7, and the monotonicity in γ of the norms Ḣγ D ( Ω yield β( u(t, Ḣ D ( Ω + β( tu(t, Ḣ1 D ( Ω Ct n/ ( f Ḣ D ( Ω + g Ḣ 1 D ( Ω. Similarly, by looking at u tt, u ttt, etc., we see that ( β( u(t, Ḣs D ( Ω + β( tu(t, Ḣs 1 D ( Ω Ct n/ f Ḣs D ( Ω + g Ḣ s 1 D ( Ω (.8 for any nonnegative integer s > 1. Thus, by complex interpolation between (.4,(.6, and (.8, we have ( β( u(t, Ḣγ D ( Ω + β( tu(t, Ḣγ 1 D ( Ω Ct n/ f Ḣγ D ( Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D ( Ω (.9 for any γ. Finally, by the characterization of the homogeneous Sobolev spaces given above, this is equivalent to (.1 for any γ < n/. 9
14 3 Weighted Minkowski Estimates In this section we show that weighted versions of the Minkowski Strichartz estimates for solutions to the homogeneous wave equation can be obtained when the initial data are compactly supported. Specifically, we are looking at the homogeneous free wave equation w(t, x = t w(t, x w(t, x =, (t, x R R n, w(, x = f(x Ḣγ (R n, (3.1 t w(, x = g(x Ḣγ 1 (R n. where the Cauchy data f, g are supported in {x R n : x < R}. 3.1 Weighted Energy Estimates We begin by showing that one can obtain weighted versions of the energy inequality. For the case n 3, we need only slightly modify the arguments of Hörmander [9] (Lemma 6.3.5, p. 11 and Lax-Philips [14] (Appendix 3. Lemma 3.1. Suppose that n 3. Let w(t, x be a solution to the homogeneous Minkowski wave equation (3.1 with smooth initial data f, g supported in { x R}. Then, the following estimate holds (t x ( x w(t, x + ( t w(t, x Proof. It is not difficult to check that where div x p + t q = N(w w N(w = 4t(x w + (r + t w t + (n 1tw p = tw t x 4t(x w w + t w x (r + t w t w (n 1tw w ( f dx C R + g dx q = 4t(x ww t + (r + t ( w + w t + (n 1twwt (n 1w. 1
15 If we integrate over a cylinder [, T ] {x R n : x R} for R sufficiently large, Huygens principle and the divergence theorem gives us that: q dx q dx =. (3. t=t Here, since the initial data are compactly supported, we have q dx = r ( x w(, x + w t (, x (n 1w(, x dx t= t=( f C R + g dx. Now, let us introduce the standard invariant vector fields Z = t t + t= n x j j, Z k = t k + x k t, Z jk = x k j x j k j=1 for j, k = 1,,..., n. Notice that ( q dx = Z w + t=t t=t j<k n Z jk w + (n 1tww t (n 1w (3.3 dx (3.4 Applying Lemma of Hörmander [9] (p. 11, we see that (3.-(3.4 yield Z w(t, L (R n + ( f Z jk w(t, L (R n C R + g dx. (3.5 j<k Thus, we see that in order to complete the proof, it suffices to show that ( (t r wt + w dx Z w L (R n + Z jk w L (R n. j<k n Since the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives us that w wr and since 4trw t w r tr(w t + w r, we have Z w L (R n + as desired. j<k n Z jk w L (R n = ( (t + r wt + w + 4trw t w r dx = (t r (w t + w + trwt + tr w + 4trwt w r ( (t r wt + w We can use a different argument to extend the above result to the case n =. 11
16 Lemma 3.. Suppose that n =. Let w(t, x be a solution to the homogeneous Minkowski wave equation (3.1 with smooth initial data f, g supported in { x R}. Then, the following estimate holds for any θ < 1. (t x θ t w(t, x L x (R C R ( f Ḣ1 (R + g L (R Proof. For t x R, the inequality follows trivially from standard conservation of energy. We will, thus, focus on S t = {x R : t x > R}. We know that w is given by ( ( t dy t w(t, x = t f(x + ty + π 1 y π Since y <1 v(t, x = t π y <1 y <1 dy f(x + ty 1 y dy g(x + ty. 1 y is a solution to the initial value problem v = ; v(, x =, t v(, x = f(x, we have ( t dy t w(t, x = x f(x + ty π y <1 1 y ( t dy + t g(x + ty π y <1 1 y = t dy ( f(x + ty π + 1 dy g(x + ty y <1 1 y π y <1 1 y + t dy ( g(x + ty y π, y <1 1 y and thus, (t x θ t w(t, x L x (S t (t t dy x θ ( f(x + ty π y <1 1 y 1 dy + (t x θ g(x + ty π y <1 1 y L x (S t + (t t dy x θ ( g(x + ty y π 1 y y <1 L x (S t L x (S t. (3.6 1
17 We will examine the three quantities on the right separately. For the first, a change of variables and integration by parts (using the fact that f is compactly supported gives: (t x θ dy t ( f(x + ty y <1 1 y = C (t 1 dy x θ ( f(x y t y <t 1 y t dy = C (t x θ ( f(x y y <t t y C t x θ y dy f (x y (t y. 3/ y <t Since we have that y x + R on the support of f, Thus, on S t, (t x θ t y <1 1 (t y 1 θ (t x R. θ dy ( f(x + ty 1 y C y t R y dy f (x y (t y 3/ θ (t + y. 3/ Applying Young s inequality to the convolution on the right yields (t t dy x θ ( f(x + ty π y <1 1 y L x (S t C f L y 1 (R (t y 3/ θ (t + y 3/ C f L y (R (t y 3/ θ (t + y 3/ L ({ y <t R} L ({ y <t R} The last inequality is a result of Hölder s inequality (since f is compactly supported. We, thus, need to show that the second norm on the right is bounded independent of. 13
18 t. To do so, we write this integral in polar coordinates and evaluate. Since θ < 1, y t R π (t y 3 θ (t + y dy = ρ 3 dθ dρ 3 (t ρ 3 θ (t + ρ 3 y <t R C t R C t t θ t R ρ 3 (t ρ 3 θ (t + ρ ρ dρ (t ρ 3 θ θ dρ Ct θ [(tr R +θ (t +θ ] t C t θ (Rt R C θ as desired. The last inequality follows from the fact that we are assuming t t x > R. For the second piece on the right side of (3.6, a change of variables and considerations of the support of g, as above, yield dy (t x θ g(x + ty y <1 1 y C (t x θ dy g(x y t y <t t y C 1 dy g(x y t 1 θ t y. y <t R Applying Young s inequality and Hölder s inequality to the norm of the compactly supported function g yields (t x θ dy g(x + ty y <1 1 y L (S t C t g 1 1 θ L 1 (R t y L ({ y t R} C t g 1 1 θ L (R. t y L ({ y t R} We, thus, need to prove that the second norm is bounded by Ct 1 θ. Expanding the square of this norm and writing in polar coordinates gives dy t R π t y = ρ dθ dρ t ρ y <t R C t R ρ t ρ dρ = C ( ln t ln(rt R Ct θ 14
19 for any θ < 1, as desired. For the last piece on the right side of (3.6, we again do a change of variables and integrate by parts (t x θ dy t ( g(x + ty y y <1 1 y (t x θ [ ] 1 = C g(x y t y <t R t y + y dy (t y 3/ C 1 dy g(x y t 1 θ y <t R t y (t x θ y + C g(x y dy t y <t R (t y 3/ C 1 dy g(x y t 1 θ y <t R t y + C(t x θ y g(x y dy. (t y 3/ y <t R By the previous step, the first piece is bounded by C g L (R. Replacing f by g in the argument used for the first step of this proof, the second integral is bounded by C g L (R. Using the bounds that we have just demonstrated for each piece on the right side of (3.6, we have that as desired. ( (t x θ t w(t, x L (R C f Ḣ1 (R + g L (R 3. Weighted Dispersive Inequality Next, we look at the weighted analog of the dispersive inequality when the initial data have compact supports. Here we refer to well-known stationary phase estimates. Lemma 3.3. Suppose n. Let w be a solution to the homogeneous Minkowski wave equation (3.1 with initial data f, g supported in { x R}. Then, we have ( t x t w(t, x L x ({ t x R} C R ( f L t (n 1/ (R n + g L (R n. 15
20 Proof. By scaling, we may assume that R = 1. For simplicity, we will demonstrate the result for t >. Begin by writing w = w 1 + w, where w 1 is a solution of the homogeneous Minkowski wave equation (3.1 with Cauchy data (w, w t t= = (f, and w is a solution of the Minkowski wave equation (3.1 with Cauchy data (w, w t t= = (, g. It will, thus, suffice to show that the estimate holds for w 1 and w separately. Since the arguments are the same for each piece, we will restrict our attention to showing that the estimate holds for w, the more technical piece. Since t w is a linear combination of e ±it g, it will be enough to prove that: (t x e it g when g is supported in { x < 1}. L ({t x >} C t (n 1/ g L (R n We begin by fixing a smooth, radial cutoff function χ such that χ(ξ = 1 for { ξ 1} and χ(ξ = for { ξ }. Then, set β(ξ = χ(ξ χ(ξ. Thus, β is a compactly supported, smooth, radial function supported away from. In fact, it is not hard to show that supp β {1/ ξ }, and that we have a partition of unity for all ξ. χ(ξ + We decompose e it g as follows: β j=1 ( ξ = 1 j (t x e it g L ({t x >} (t x e it χ( g L ({t x >} ( + (t x e it β g L ({t x >}. (3.7 j=1 We, then, want to examine the pieces on the right side of the decomposition. j 16
21 Since g is supported in { x 1}, we see that ( (t x e it β g j ( t x ξ e i(x y ξ e it ξ β dξ g(y dy j ( ( t x ξ sup e i(x y ξ e it ξ β dξ g L 1 (R n Similarly, we have y 1 t x sup y 1 (t x e it χ( g Set ( K j (t, x; y = for j = 1,, 3,... and set K (t, x; y = e i(x y ξ e it ξ β t x ( sup y 1 e i(x y ξ e it ξ β j ( ξ j dξ g L (R n. e i(x y ξ e it ξ χ(ξ dξ g L (R n. ( ξ j e i(x y ξ e it ξ χ(ξ dξ. For j >, using polar coordinates, we see that we can rewrite this as ( ρ K j (t, x; y = e iρ[(x y ω+t] β ρ n 1 dσ(ω dρ S n 1 j = jn e iρ[j ((x y ω+t] a(ρ dσ(ω dρ S n 1 where a is the smooth function that is compactly supported away from given by β(ρρ n 1. For j =, we similarly have K (t, x; y = e iρ[((x y ω+t] a (ρ dσ(ω dρ S n 1 where a is given by ρ n 1 χ(ρ. While a ( =, it is not identically zero in a neighborhood of the origin. There are four different cases that we must examine separately. For the first two cases, we assume that t x y. Then, for j = 1,, 3,..., set I j = jn e iρ[j (x y ω+ jt] a(ρ dρ. dξ 17
22 Integrating by parts N times yields (using the fact that a is compactly supported away from : jn I j C jn C jn (n 1/ 1 t x y N jn t (n 1/ t x y N (n 1/ for any N =, 1,,... Thus, if we choose N > n, we see that: where m >. For j =, set K j (t, x; y C jm 1 1 t (n 1/ t x y (3.8 I = e iρ[(x y ω+t] a (ρ dρ. Here, since a is not supported away from zero, we need to be a bit more careful with the boundary terms. Since dn dρ N a = dn dρ N ( ρ n 1 χ(ρ = for N < n 1, we can integrate by parts n times (on the n th time we get a boundary term. Using the fact that a is compactly supported, this yields: I χ( (t + ω (x y n + e iρ[(x y ω+t] (t + ω (x y n a(n (ρ dρ 1 C t x y n Thus, we have 1 1 C t (n 1/. t x y (n+1/ 1 1 K (t, x; y C t (n 1/ t x y. (3.9 For the last two cases, we have that t < x y. Here, for j = 1,, 3,..., we write and for j =, K j (t, x; y = jn dσ( j ρ(x ye ijρt a(ρ dρ K (t, x; y = By Theorem 1..1 of Sogge [5], we have that dσ(ρ(x ye iρt a (ρ dρ. dσ(η = e i η a 1 (η + e i η a (η 18
23 where a 1, a satisfy the bounds: ( µ a i (η η C µ(1 + η (n 1/ µ for i = 1,. Thus, we have, for j = 1,, 3...: K j (t, x; y = jn e iρ[j (t x y ] a 1 ( j ρ(x ya(ρ dρ + jn e iρ[j (t+ x y ] a ( j ρ(x ya(ρ dρ and similarly, K (t, x; y = + e iρ[(t x y ] a 1 (ρ(x ya (ρ dρ e iρ[(t+ x y ] a (ρ(x ya (ρ dρ. Since supp a(ρ {1/ ρ }, integrating by parts N times and the estimates for a 1, a yield K j (t, x; y = C jn 1 jn ( j (n 1/ 1 x y (n 1/ C( j (n+1/ N 1 1 t (n 1/. t x y N [ ] t x y N t + x y N If we choose N > (n+1 and use the fact that we are focusing on t x and y 1, we see that: where m >. K j (t, x; y C jm 1 1 t (n 1/ t x y (3.1 Again, for j =, we need to be careful with the boundary terms when integrating by parts. Since a (M ( = for M < n 1 and a is compactly supported, integrating by parts N times (for N < n yields 1 K (t, x; y = (t x y N 1 + (t + x y N ( N e ρ iρ[(t x y ] (a 1 (ρ(x ya (ρ dρ ( N e ρ iρ[(t+ x y ] (a (ρ(x ya (ρ dρ. 19
24 Each of these integrals are composed of pieces of the form: ( k ( N k i k,j = C k e iρ(t± x y [a m (ρ(x y] (ρ ρ n 1 χ(ρ dρ ρ ( k ( N k j = C k,j e iρ(t± x y ρ ρ (n 1 j [a m (ρ(x y] (χ(ρ dρ ρ for m = 1,. ( N k j When j N k, ρ (χ(ρ is supported away from zero and the above argument gives the desired bound i k,j C 1 e iρ(t± x y C x y (n 1/ x y k (1 + ρ x y (n 1/+k ρn 1 j dρ When j = N k, we have, by a change of variables, ( k i k,n k = C e iρ(t± x y ρ n 1 N+k χ(ρ [a m (ρ(x y] dρ ρ C x y k (1 + ρ x y n 1 C x y N n x y C x y (n 1/ +k ρn 1 N+k dρ ρ n 1 N+k (1 + ρ n 1 +k dρ for N < n+1. Since we are assuming that n, we, in particular, get the bound for N = 1. Plugging these estimates for i k,j into the equation for K when N = 1 and using the fact that we are in the case t < x y, we see that on {t x } { y 1}. 1 1 K (t, x; y C t (n 1/ t x y (3.11
25 Using the estimates (3.8,(3.1 for K j (j=,1,,..., we now see that: ( (t x e it β g j C jm 1 t sup (n 1/ y 1 ( t x t x y C jm 1 t x t (n 1/ t x 1 g L (R n g L (R n where m >. Hence, we have: ( (t x e it β g j L ({t x >} C jm 1 t g (n 1/ L (R n. Similarly, using (3.9, (3.11, we have (t x e it χ( 1 g L ({t x >} C t g (n 1/ L (R n. Plugging these into (3.7, we see that we get the desired bound for w since jm is summable in j for m >. 3.3 Weighted Strichartz Estimates From the previous three lemmas, we are able to derive a weighted Strichartz estimate for solutions to the Minkowski wave equation with compactly supported initial data. Theorem 3.4. Suppose n and p, q, γ are admissible. Let w be a solution to the homogeneous Minkowski wave equation (3.1 with Cauchy data f, g supported in { x R}. Then, for any θ < 1, we have the following estimate: ( t x θ w(t, x L p t Lq x(r 1+n C R ( f Ḣγ (R n + g Ḣ γ 1 (R n. Proof. By the Global Minkowski Strichartz estimate (1.3 and Huygens principle, it will suffice to show the estimate in the case t x R. We will, also, stick to the case t. Let S t = {x : t x R}. By Lemma 3.1 (n 3, Lemma 3. (n =, and Lemma 3.3, we have: ( (t x θ t w(t, x L x (S t C f Ḣ1 (R n + g L (R n (t x θ t w(t, x L x (S t C ( t (n 1/ f Ḣ1 (R n + g L (R n. 1
26 In the second inequality, we have used the fact that f is compactly supported and the monotonicity in γ of Ḣ γ for such f. By Riesz-Thorin interpolation, we have (t x θ t w(t, x L q x (S t C ( 1 (1 q ( t (n 1/ f Ḣ1 (R n + g L (R n. Since by (1.4 p n 1 ( 1 > p q ( n 1 ( 1 q 1, we see that taking the L p t norm of both sides yields ( (t x θ t w(t, x L p t Lq x({t R} S t C f Ḣ1 (R n + g L (R n. (3.1 If we now argue as we did in obtaining (.6 from (.5, we see that (3.1 yields ( (t x θ w(t, x L p t Lq x({t R} S t C f L (R n + g Ḣ 1 (R n. (3.13 The result, then, follows from the monotonicity of the Sobolev norms since the data f, g are compactly supported and γ.
27 4 Mixed Estimates in Minkowski Space In this section, we prove a couple of results that follow from the fact that sup ξ ξ γ [ β(ξ η δ(τ η dη ] C n,γ,β τ γ (4.1 if β is a smooth function supported in { x 1} and γ n. Proof of Equation (4.1. Expanding in polar coordinates, we see that ξ γ ˆβ(ξ η δ(τ η dη = ξ γ S n 1 ˆβ(ξ τω τ n 1 dσ(ω. (4. Thus, Since by On the set ξ τ, since ˆβ is Schwarz class, we have sup ξ τ ξ γ (1+ ξ n+1 as desired. ˆβ(ξ τω C (1 + ξ τω C n+1 (1 + ξ. n+1 ξ γ [ β(ξ η δ(τ η dη ] C sup ξ τ ξ γ (1 + ξ n+1 τ n 1. is a decreasing function in ξ, we have that the right side is bounded τ n 1 C (1 + τ τ γ Cτ γ n+1 For the case ξ τ, using the fact that ˆβ is Schwarz class, we have Sn 1 ˆβ(ξ τω τ n 1 τ n 1 dσ(ω C dσ(ω S (1 + ξ τω n 1 n+1 Together with (4., this yields [ sup ξ γ ξ τ which proves (4.1. C C τ+1 Sn 1 ρ n 1 τ dσ(ω dρ (1 + ξ ρω n+1 1 dz <. R (1 + z n n+1 ] ˆβ(ξ η δ(τ η dη < Cτ γ The first of the results that we shall prove follows with very little change from [3]. The second result requires a different argument from [3] in order to avoid needing sharp Huygens principle. 3
28 Lemma 4.1. Let β be a smooth function supported in { x 1}. Suppose γ n. Then β( e it f( dt C Ḣ γ (R n n,γ,β f Ḣ γ (R n Proof. By Plancherel s theorem in t and x, we can write β( e it f( dt = C ξ γ ˆβ(ξ ηδ(τ η ˆf(η dη Ḣ γ (R n dξ dτ. By the Schwarz inequality (in η, this can be bounded by ( ( C ξ γ ˆβ(ξ η δ(τ η dη ˆβ(ξ η δ(τ η ˆf(η dη dξ dτ. Now, applying (4.1, we see that β( e it f( dt Ḣ γ (R n ( C τ γ ˆβ(ξ η δ(τ η ˆf(η dη dξ dτ C ˆβ(ξ η η γ ˆf(η dη dξ. However, by Young s inequality, this is bounded by C η γ ˆf(η dη = C f. Ḣ γ (R n Lemma 4.. Let w be a solution to the Cauchy problem for the Minkowski wave equation w(t, x = t w(t, x w(t, x = F (t, x, (t, x R R n, w(, x = f(x, t w(, x = g(x. Suppose that the global Minkowski Strichartz estimate (1.3 holds, that γ n, and that r <. Then, for β a smooth function supported in { x 1 }, we have sup α 1 β( α x w(t, dt C ( Ḣ γ 1 (R n f Ḣγ (R n + g Ḣ γ 1 (R n + F. L r t Ls x(r 1+n 4
29 Proof. If F =, the result follows from Lemma 4.1. Thus, it will suffice to show that β( w(t, dt C F Ḣ γ (R n L r t Ls x(r 1+n when the initial data f, g are assumed to vanish. We begin by establishing that sin(t sλ T F (t, x = Λ γ β( F (s, ds Λ is bounded from L r t L s x(r 1+n + to L t L x(r 1+n. In other words, we want to show that sin(t sλ β( F (s, dx Λ dt C F Ḣ γ (R n L r t Ls x (R1+n (4.3 when F is assumed to vanish for t <. By Strichartz estimate (1.3, we have η γ η F η ( η, η γ dη = η e is η ˆF (s, η ds dη t sup η γ e i(t s η ˆF (s, η ds t η dη ( sup w(t, + Ḣ t γ (R n tw(t, Ḣ γ 1 (R n (4.4 C F L r t Ls x (R1+n where F denotes the space-time Fourier transform of F. By Plancherel s theorem in t, x, we have e i(t sλ β( Λ F (s, ds dt = Ḣ γ (R n ξ γ ˆβ(ξ ηδ(τ η 1 η F ( η, η dη dξ dτ. By the Schwarz inequality in η, this can be bounded by ξ γ ( ˆβ(ξ η δ(τ η dη ( ˆβ(ξ η δ(τ η 1 η F ( η, η dη dξ dτ. 5
30 Applying (4.1, (4.4, and Young s inequality, we see that e i(t sλ β( Λ F (s, ds dt Ḣ γ (R n τ γ ˆβ(ξ η δ(τ η 1 η F ( η, η dη dξ dτ = ˆβ(ξ η η γ η F ( η, η dη dξ η γ C η F ( η, η dη C F L r t Ls x (R1+n. By a similar argument, we can show that the same bound holds for e i(t sλ β( F (s, ds Λ dt Ḣ γ (R n which establishes (4.3. By duality, this is equivalent to having bounded, where We wanted to show, instead, that is bounded, where T F : L t L x(r 1+n L r t L s x (R 1+n sin(s tλ T F = β( Λ γ F (s, ds. Λ W F : L r tl s x(r 1+n L t L x(r 1+n t W F (t, x = Λ γ β( By duality, this is equivalent to showing that where sin(t sλ F (s, ds. Λ W F : L t L x(r 1+n L r t L s x (R 1+n W F (t, x = t sin(s tλ β( Λ γ F (s, ds. Λ This, however, follows from (4.3 after an application of the following lemma of Christ and Kiselev [6] (see also [3]. 6
31 Lemma 4.3. Let X and Y be Banach spaces and assume that K(t, s is a continuous function taking its values in B(X, Y, the space of bounded linear mappings from X to Y. Suppose that a < b and 1 p < q. Set T f(t = b a K(t, sf(s ds and Suppose that W f(t = t a K(t, sf(s ds. T f L q ([a,b],y C f L p ([a,b],x. Then, W f L q ([a,b],y C f L p ([a,b],x. 7
32 5 Strichartz Estimates in the Exterior Domain By scaling, we may take R = 1 in the sequel. We begin by proving a weighted version of Theorem 1.1 when the data and forcing terms are compactly supported. Lemma 5.1. Suppose u is a solution to the Cauchy problem (1.1 with the forcing term F replaced by F + G, where F, G are supported in { t 1} { x 1} and the initial data f, g are supported in { x 1}. Then, for admissible p, q, r, s, γ, there exist a positive, finite constant C and a θ > 1/, so that the following estimate holds: ( t x + θ u(t, x L p t Lq x(r Ω ( C f Ḣγ D (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω + F L r t Ls x (R Ω + G(t, Ḣγ 1 D (Ω dt. Proof: We will establish the result for t. We begin this proof in the same manner as in Smith-Sogge [3]. Start by observing that by (1. and Duhamel s principle, the result holds for t [, 1] and by (1. u(1, Ḣγ D (Ω + tu(1, Ḣγ 1 D ( (Ω C f Ḣγ D (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω + F L r t Ls x(r Ω + G(t, Ḣγ 1 D (Ω dt. (5.1 By considering t 1, Duhamel s principle and support considerations allow us to take F = G = with f, g supported in { x }. We now fix a smooth β with β(x = 1 for x 1, and β(x = for x 1. We, then, write u as u = βu + (1 βu and will examine these pieces separately. We begin by looking at βu. Notice that (βu = n b j (x xj u + c(xu G(t, x j=1 where b j, c are supported in 1 x 1. Since t x t, it will suffice to show ( (t + θ β(xu(t, x L p t Lq x([1, Ω C f Ḣγ D (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω. By the local Strichartz estimate (1., Duhamel s principle, and local energy decay 8
33 (.1, we have (t + θ β(xu(t, x p L p t Lq x([1, Ω (j + 3 pθ β(xu(t, x p L p t Lq x([j,j+1] Ω C j=1 (j + 3 pθ( β( u(j, Ḣγ D (Ω + β( tu(j, Ḣγ 1 j=1 j+1 + G(s, Ḣγ 1 D j (Ω ds p (j + 3 pθ ( C (j + 3 p(n/ f Ḣγ D (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D j=1 ( p = C f Ḣγ D (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 (Ω D (Ω p so long as n θ > 1. For n 4, since p, we have the above inequality provided p θ < n 1. When n =, by (1.4, we must have p 4. Thus, the above inequality holds for any θ < 3 4. For the v(t, x = (1 β(xu(t, x piece, we have that v satisfies the Minkowski wave equation v(t, x = G(t, x v(, x = (1 β(xf(x t v(, x = (1 β(xg(x. Write v = v + v 1 where v solves the homogeneous wave equation with the same Cauchy data as v and v 1 solves the inhomogeneous wave equation with vanishing Cauchy data. Then, by Theorem 3.4, we have D (Ω (t x + θ (1 β(xu(t, x L p t Lq x(r Ω ( C (1 β(xf Ḣγ (R n + (1 β(xg(x Ḣ γ 1 (R n + (t x + θ v 1 (t, x L p t Lq x(r Ω. When n 4, we can handle the last piece easily using local energy decay. By Duhamel s principle, write t (t x + θ v 1 (t, x L p t Lq x(r Ω = (t x + θ v 1 (s; t s, x ds L p t Lq x(r Ω 9
34 where v 1 (s;, solves v 1 (s; t, x = v 1 (s;, x = t v 1 (s;, x = G(s, x. Applying Minkowski s integral inequality, we have (t x + θ v 1 (t, x L p t Lq x(r Ω C s θ (t s x + θ v 1 (s; t s, x L p t Lq x(r Ω ds. Thus, by Theorem 3.4, the right side is bounded by s θ G(s, Ḣγ 1 (R n ds. Finally, by Calderon s extension [5] discussed in Section and local energy decay (.1, we have that this is bounded by ( ( C s θ n f Ḣγ (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω ds C f Ḣγ (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω for θ < 1. For n =, the situation is a bit more delicate. In the remainder of this proof, we will assume that q < p. A simple modification of the proof will yield the case q p 4. We begin by setting G j (t, x = χ [j,j+1] (t G(t, x where χ A is the characteristic function of the set A. Let v 1,j be the forward solution to v 1,j (t, x = G j (t, x with vanishing Cauchy data. By Hölder s inequality, we then have (t x + θ v 1 (t, x = (t x + θ v 1,j (t, x j=3 C (t j x + θ v 1,j (t, x + C j θ v 1,j (t, x j< 1 (t x + j 1 ( (t x + C j (t j x + θ+ 1 4 v1,j (t, x 5/4 4/5 ( 1/q + C j θ (t x j + 1 ε v 1,j (t, x q j 3
35 provided ε = ε(q is sufficiently small. Thus, by Minkowski s integral inequality ( t x + θ v 1 (t, x L p t Lq x(r Ω ( C (t j x + θ+ 1 4 v1,j (t, x 5/4 L p t Lq x(r Ω By Duhamel s principle, write j 4/5 ( 1/q + C j qθ (t j x + 1 ε v 1,j (t, x q L p t x(r Ω (5. Lq j v 1,j (t, x = t v 1,j (s; t s, x ds where v 1,j (s;, solves v 1,j (s; t, x = v 1,j (s;, x = t v 1,j (s;, x = G j (s, x For the first term on the right side of (5., if we apply Theorem 3.4, we have j (t j x + θ+ 1 4 v1,j (t, x 5/4 L p t Lq x(r Ω = C j C j C j C (t j x + θ+ 1 4 ( j+1 j ( j+1 j j+1 j v 1,j (s; t s, x ds 5/4 L p t Lq x(r Ω (t s x + θ+ 1 4 v1,j (s; t s, x L p t Lq x(r Ω ds G(s, Ḣγ 1 (R ds 5/4 G(s, 5/4 Ḣ γ 1 (R ds. By Calderon s extension [5] (see Proposition.1 and local energy decay (.1, this is bounded by ( f Ḣγ 5/4 ( 5/4 C s 5/4 (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 ds C D (Ω f Ḣγ (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω as desired. 5/4 31
36 For the second term on the right side of (5., we proceed similarly. Applying Theorem 3.4, we observe j qθ (t j x + 1 ε v 1,j (t, x q L p t Lq x(r Ω j = C j C j j qθ (t j x + 1 ε ( j+1 j ( j+1 j+1 j v 1,j (s; t s, x ds q L p t Lq x(r Ω q s θ (t s x + 1 ε v 1,j (s; t s, x L p t Lq x(r Ω ds C q s θ G(s, Ḣγ 1 (R ds j j C s qθ G(s, q. Ḣ γ 1 (R Again, by Calderon s extension [5] (see Proposition.1 and local energy decay (.1, this is bounded by C s q+qθ ( f Ḣγ (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω q ds C ( q f Ḣγ (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω provided θ < 1 1. Since q > for n =, we see that we may choose θ > 1/ as q desired. We are now ready to prove the main theorem. Proof of Theorem 1.1. By the previous lemma, it will suffice to show the result when f and g vanish for { x 1}. We begin by decomposing u into u(t, x = u (t, x v(t, x where u solves the Minkowski wave equation u (t, x = F (t, x u (, x = f(x t u (, x = g(x. Here F is assumed to be on R n \Ω. 3
37 We now fix a smooth compactly supported β such that β(x = 1 for x 1/ and β(x = for x 1. Then, further decompose u into u(t, x = u (t, x v(t, x = (1 β(xu (t, x + (β(xu (t, x v(t, x. By the Global Minkowski Strichartz estimate (1.3, (1 β(xu (t, x satisfies the desired estimate. Thus, we may focus on β(xu (t, x v(t, x. We have that β(xu (t, x v(t, x satisfies (β(xu (t, x v(t, x = β(xf (t, x + G(t, x with zero Cauchy data (since we are assuming that f, g vanish for x 1. Here G(t, x = n b j (x xj u (t, x + c(xu (t, x. j=1 where b j, c vanish for x 1. By Lemma 4., Let ( G(t, C Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω f Ḣγ D (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω + F L r t Ls x (R Ω (5.3 F j (t, x = χ [j,j+1] (tf (t, x G j (t, x = χ [j,j+1] (tg(t, x, and write (for t > βu v = where u j (t, x is the forward solution to u j (t, x j= with zero Cauchy data. Thus, by Lemma 5.1, we have u j (t, x = β(xf j (t, x + G j (t, x (t j x + θ u j (t, x L p t Lq x(r Ω ( C F j (t, x L r t L s x(r Ω + j+1 j G(t, Ḣγ 1 D (Ω dt. (5.4 33
38 Since u j is supported in the region t j x + 1, an application of the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality yields β(xu (t, x v(t, x u j (t, x j= ( 1/ ( 1/ (t j x + θ [(t j x + θ u j (t, x] j= j= ( 1/ C [(t j x + θ u j (t, x] j= since we can choose θ > 1/. Since 1 r, s p, q, Minkowski s integral inequality, (5.3, and (5.4 yield as desired. β(xu (t, x v(t, x L p t Lq x(r Ω C (t j x + θ u j L p t Lq x(r Ω C C j= F j L r t Ls x (R Ω + C j= F j L + C r t Ls x(r Ω j= C F L r t Ls x(r Ω + C ( j+1 j= j ( j+1 j= j G(t, Ḣ γ 1 D G(t, Ḣγ 1 D (Ω dt G(t, Ḣ γ 1 (Ω dt ( C f Ḣγ D (Ω + g Ḣ γ 1 D (Ω + F L r t Ls x (R Ω D (Ω dt 34
39 References [1] M. Beals: Global time decay of the amplitude of a reflected wave, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, 1, (1996, [] M. Beals, W. Strauss: Time decay estimates for a perturbed wave equation, Journées Équations aux dérivées partielles, St. Jean de Monts, (199, Exp. no XIII. [3] J. Bergh, J. Lofstrom: Interpolation spaces: an introduction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, [4] N. Burq: Global Strichartz estimates for nontrapping geometries: A remark about an article by H. Smith and C. Sogge, preprint. [5] A. P. Calderon: Lebesgue spaces of differentiable functions and distributions, Proc. Symp. in Pure Math., 4, (1961, [6] M. Christ, A. Kiselev: Maximal Inequality, preprint. [7] J. Genibre, G. Velo: Generalized Strichartz inequalities for the wave equation, J. Funct. Anal., 133, (1995, [8] V. Georgiev, H. Lindblad, C.D. Sogge: Weighted Strichartz estimates and global existence for semilinear wave equations, Amer. J. Math., 119, (1997, [9] L. Hörmander: The analysis of linear partial differential operators, Vols. I-IV, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, [1] L. Hörmander: Lectures on Nonlinear Hyperbolic Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, [11] M. Keel, H. Smith, C.D. Sogge: Global existence for a quasilinear wave equation outside of star-shaped domains, J. Funct. Anal., 189, (, [1] M. Keel, H. Smith, C.D. Sogge: On global existence for nonlinear wave equations outside of a convex obstacle, Amer. J. Math., 1, (,
40 [13] M. Keel, T. Tao: Endpoint Strichartz Estimates, Amer J. Math., 1, (1998, [14] P. D. Lax, R. S. Philips: Scattering Theory (Revised Edition, Academic Press Inc., [15] H. Lindblad, C.D. Sogge: On existence and scattering with minimal regularity for semilinear wave equations, J. Funct. Anal, 13, (1995, [16] R. Melrose: Singularities and energy decay in acoustical scattering, Duke Math. J., 46, (1979, [17] C. Morawetz: Decay for solutions of the exterior problem for the wave equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 8, (1975, [18] C. Morawetz: The decay of solutions of the exterior initial-boundary value problem for the wave equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 14, (1961, [19] C. Morawetz: Exponential Decay of Solutions of the Wave Equation, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 19, (1966, [] C. Morawetz, J. Ralston, W. Strauss: Decay of solutions of the wave equation outside nontrapping obstacles, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 3, (1977, [1] J. Ralston: Note on the decay of acoustic waves, Duke Math. J., 46, (1979, [] S. Selberg: Notes on PDE, Johns Hopkins University, Spring, 1. [3] H. Smith, C.D. Sogge: Global Strichartz estimates for nontrapping perturbations of the Laplacian, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 5, (, [4] H. Smith, C.D. Sogge: On the critical semilinear wave equation outside convex obstacles, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 8, (1995, [5] C.D. Sogge: Fourier integrals in classical analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press,
41 [6] C.D. Sogge: Lectures on nonlinear wave equations, International Press, Cambridge, MA, [7] E. Stein: Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality, and oscillatory integrals, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, [8] E. Stein: Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 197. [9] W. Strauss: Dispersal of waves vanishing on the boundary of an exterior domain, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 8, (1975, [3] R. Strichartz: A priori estimates for the wave equation and some applications, J. Funct. Analysis, 5, (197, [31] R. Strichartz: Restriction of Fourier transform to quadratic surfaces and decay of solutions to the wave equation Duke Math. J., 44, (1977, [3] M. Taylor: Grazing rays and reflection of singularities of solutions to wave equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 9, (1976, [33] M. Taylor: Partial differential equations I-III, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, [34] B. R. Vainberg: On the short wave asymptotic behavior of solutions of stationary problems and the asymptotic behavior as t of solutions of non-stationary problems, Russian Math Surveys, 3:, (1975,
42 Vita Jason Metcalfe was born in September 1975 and was raised in Ottoville, Ohio. He began his undergraduate career in 1993 at the University of Dayton, and in 1998, he received Bachelor of Science degrees in mathematics and computer science from the University of Washington. That fall, he enrolled in the graduate program at Johns Hopkins University. He defended this thesis on March 18, 3. 38
Strauss conjecture for nontrapping obstacles
Chengbo Wang Joint work with: Hart Smith, Christopher Sogge Department of Mathematics Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland 21218 wangcbo@jhu.edu November 3, 2010 1 Problem and Background Problem
More informationLectures on Non-Linear Wave Equations
Lectures on Non-Linear Wave Equations Second Edition Christopher D. Sogge Department of Mathematics Johns Hopkins University International Press www.intlpress.com Lectures on Non-Linear Wave Equations,
More informationA COUNTEREXAMPLE TO AN ENDPOINT BILINEAR STRICHARTZ INEQUALITY TERENCE TAO. t L x (R R2 ) f L 2 x (R2 )
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2006(2006), No. 5, pp. 6. ISSN: 072-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) A COUNTEREXAMPLE
More informationExistence theorems for some nonlinear hyperbolic equations on a waveguide
Existence theorems for some nonlinear hyperbolic equations on a waveguide by Ann C. Stewart A dissertation submitted to the Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of
More informationA REMARK ON AN EQUATION OF WAVE MAPS TYPE WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS
A REMARK ON AN EQUATION OF WAVE MAPS TYPE WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS DAN-ANDREI GEBA Abstract. We obtain a sharp local well-posedness result for an equation of wave maps type with variable coefficients.
More informationSharp estimates for a class of hyperbolic pseudo-differential equations
Results in Math., 41 (2002), 361-368. Sharp estimates for a class of hyperbolic pseudo-differential equations Michael Ruzhansky Abstract In this paper we consider the Cauchy problem for a class of hyperbolic
More informationDispersive Equations and Hyperbolic Orbits
Dispersive Equations and Hyperbolic Orbits H. Christianson Department of Mathematics University of California, Berkeley 4/16/07 The Johns Hopkins University Outline 1 Introduction 3 Applications 2 Main
More informationCUTOFF RESOLVENT ESTIMATES AND THE SEMILINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
CUTOFF RESOLVENT ESTIMATES AND THE SEMILINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION HANS CHRISTIANSON Abstract. This paper shows how abstract resolvent estimates imply local smoothing for solutions to the Schrödinger equation.
More informationA LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE. 1.
A LOWER BOUND ON BLOWUP RATES FOR THE 3D INCOMPRESSIBLE EULER EQUATION AND A SINGLE EXPONENTIAL BEALE-KATO-MAJDA ESTIMATE THOMAS CHEN AND NATAŠA PAVLOVIĆ Abstract. We prove a Beale-Kato-Majda criterion
More informationStrichartz Estimates in Domains
Department of Mathematics Johns Hopkins University April 15, 2010 Wave equation on Riemannian manifold (M, g) Cauchy problem: 2 t u(t, x) gu(t, x) =0 u(0, x) =f (x), t u(0, x) =g(x) Strichartz estimates:
More informationStrauss conjecture on asymptotically Euclidean manifolds
Strauss conjecture on asymptotically Euclidean manifolds Xin Yu (Joint with Chengbo Wang) Department of Mathematics, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Maryland 21218 xinyu@jhu.edu Mar 12-Mar 13, 2010
More informationA PHYSICAL SPACE PROOF OF THE BILINEAR STRICHARTZ AND LOCAL SMOOTHING ESTIMATES FOR THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION
A PHYSICAL SPACE PROOF OF THE BILINEAR STRICHARTZ AND LOCAL SMOOTHING ESTIMATES FOR THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION TERENCE TAO Abstract. Let d 1, and let u, v : R R d C be Schwartz space solutions to the Schrödinger
More informationStrichartz Estimates for the Schrödinger Equation in Exterior Domains
Strichartz Estimates for the Schrödinger Equation in University of New Mexico May 14, 2010 Joint work with: Hart Smith (University of Washington) Christopher Sogge (Johns Hopkins University) The Schrödinger
More informationSTRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR THE WAVE EQUATION ON MANIFOLDS WITH BOUNDARY. 1. Introduction
STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR THE WAVE EQUATION ON MANIFOLDS WITH BOUNDARY MATTHEW D. BLAIR, HART F. SMITH, AND CHRISTOPHER D. SOGGE. Introduction Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold of dimension n. Strichartz
More informationON STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS IN COMPACT MANIFOLDS WITH BOUNDARY. 1. Introduction
ON STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS IN COMPACT MANIFOLDS WITH BOUNDARY MATTHEW D. BLAIR, HART F. SMITH, AND CHRISTOPHER D. SOGGE 1. Introduction Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold of dimension
More informationRANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER
RANDOM PROPERTIES BENOIT PAUSADER. Quasilinear problems In general, one consider the following trichotomy for nonlinear PDEs: A semilinear problem is a problem where the highest-order terms appears linearly
More informationA review: The Laplacian and the d Alembertian. j=1
Chapter One A review: The Laplacian and the d Alembertian 1.1 THE LAPLACIAN One of the main goals of this course is to understand well the solution of wave equation both in Euclidean space and on manifolds
More informationNotes. 1 Fourier transform and L p spaces. March 9, For a function in f L 1 (R n ) define the Fourier transform. ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e 2πi x,ξ dx.
Notes March 9, 27 1 Fourier transform and L p spaces For a function in f L 1 (R n ) define the Fourier transform ˆf(ξ) = f(x)e 2πi x,ξ dx. Properties R n 1. f g = ˆfĝ 2. δλ (f)(ξ) = ˆf(λξ), where δ λ f(x)
More informationSharp Sobolev Strichartz estimates for the free Schrödinger propagator
Sharp Sobolev Strichartz estimates for the free Schrödinger propagator Neal Bez, Chris Jeavons and Nikolaos Pattakos Abstract. We consider gaussian extremisability of sharp linear Sobolev Strichartz estimates
More informationWe denote the space of distributions on Ω by D ( Ω) 2.
Sep. 1 0, 008 Distributions Distributions are generalized functions. Some familiarity with the theory of distributions helps understanding of various function spaces which play important roles in the study
More informationPiecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation
Piecewise Smooth Solutions to the Burgers-Hilbert Equation Alberto Bressan and Tianyou Zhang Department of Mathematics, Penn State University, University Park, Pa 68, USA e-mails: bressan@mathpsuedu, zhang
More informationResearch Statement. Xiangjin Xu. 1. My thesis work
Research Statement Xiangjin Xu My main research interest is twofold. First I am interested in Harmonic Analysis on manifolds. More precisely, in my thesis, I studied the L estimates and gradient estimates
More informationSCATTERING FOR THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL NLS WITH EXPONENTIAL NONLINEARITY
SCATTERING FOR THE TWO-DIMENSIONAL NLS WITH EXPONENTIAL NONLINEARITY S. IBRAHIM, M. MAJDOUB, N. MASMOUDI, AND K. NAKANISHI Abstract. We investigate existence and asymptotic completeness of the wave operators
More informationarxiv:math/ v1 [math.ap] 28 Oct 2005
arxiv:math/050643v [math.ap] 28 Oct 2005 A remark on asymptotic completeness for the critical nonlinear Klein-Gordon equation Hans Lindblad and Avy Soffer University of California at San Diego and Rutgers
More informationStabilization and Controllability for the Transmission Wave Equation
1900 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 46, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2001 Stabilization Controllability for the Transmission Wave Equation Weijiu Liu Abstract In this paper, we address the problem of
More informationThe 2D Magnetohydrodynamic Equations with Partial Dissipation. Oklahoma State University
The 2D Magnetohydrodynamic Equations with Partial Dissipation Jiahong Wu Oklahoma State University IPAM Workshop Mathematical Analysis of Turbulence IPAM, UCLA, September 29-October 3, 2014 1 / 112 Outline
More informationDETERMINATION OF THE BLOW-UP RATE FOR THE SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION
DETERMINATION OF THE LOW-UP RATE FOR THE SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION y FRANK MERLE and HATEM ZAAG Abstract. In this paper, we find the optimal blow-up rate for the semilinear wave equation with a power nonlinearity.
More informationGLOBAL EXISTENCE FOR THE ONE-DIMENSIONAL SEMILINEAR TRICOMI-TYPE EQUATIONS
GLOBAL EXISTENCE FOR THE ONE-DIMENSIONAL SEMILINEAR TRICOMI-TYPE EQUATIONS ANAHIT GALSTYAN The Tricomi equation u tt tu xx = 0 is a linear partial differential operator of mixed type. (For t > 0, the Tricomi
More informationFOURIER INTEGRAL OPERATORS AND NONLINEAR WAVE EQUATIONS
MATHEMATICS OF GRAVITATION PART I, LORENTZIAN GEOMETRY AND EINSTEIN EQUATIONS BANACH CENTER PUBLICATIONS, VOLUME 41 INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICS POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES WARSZAWA 1997 FOURIER INTEGRAL OPERATORS
More informationTHE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n
THE L 2 -HODGE THEORY AND REPRESENTATION ON R n BAISHENG YAN Abstract. We present an elementary L 2 -Hodge theory on whole R n based on the minimization principle of the calculus of variations and some
More informationBLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED
BLOWUP THEORY FOR THE CRITICAL NONLINEAR SCHRÖDINGER EQUATIONS REVISITED TAOUFIK HMIDI AND SAHBI KERAANI Abstract. In this note we prove a refined version of compactness lemma adapted to the blowup analysis
More informationSCALE INVARIANT FOURIER RESTRICTION TO A HYPERBOLIC SURFACE
SCALE INVARIANT FOURIER RESTRICTION TO A HYPERBOLIC SURFACE BETSY STOVALL Abstract. This result sharpens the bilinear to linear deduction of Lee and Vargas for extension estimates on the hyperbolic paraboloid
More informationChapter One. The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity
Chapter One The Calderón-Zygmund Theory I: Ellipticity Our story begins with a classical situation: convolution with homogeneous, Calderón- Zygmund ( kernels on R n. Let S n 1 R n denote the unit sphere
More informationBIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES
BIHARMONIC WAVE MAPS INTO SPHERES SEBASTIAN HERR, TOBIAS LAMM, AND ROLAND SCHNAUBELT Abstract. A global weak solution of the biharmonic wave map equation in the energy space for spherical targets is constructed.
More informationOBSERVABILITY INEQUALITY AND DECAY RATE FOR WAVE EQUATIONS WITH NONLINEAR BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 27 (27, No. 6, pp. 2. ISSN: 72-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu OBSERVABILITY INEQUALITY AND DECAY RATE FOR WAVE EQUATIONS
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 18 May 2017
Littlewood-Paley-Stein functions for Schrödinger operators arxiv:175.6794v1 [math.ap] 18 May 217 El Maati Ouhabaz Dedicated to the memory of Abdelghani Bellouquid (2/2/1966 8/31/215) Abstract We study
More informationEXISTENCE AND REGULARITY RESULTS FOR SOME NONLINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS
EXISTECE AD REGULARITY RESULTS FOR SOME OLIEAR PARABOLIC EUATIOS Lucio BOCCARDO 1 Andrea DALL AGLIO 2 Thierry GALLOUËT3 Luigi ORSIA 1 Abstract We prove summability results for the solutions of nonlinear
More informationNONLINEAR DECAY AND SCATTERING OF SOLUTIONS TO A BRETHERTON EQUATION IN SEVERAL SPACE DIMENSIONS
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 5(5), No. 4, pp. 7. ISSN: 7-669. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu (login: ftp) NONLINEAR DECAY
More informationNONLINEAR PROPAGATION OF WAVE PACKETS. Ritsumeikan University, and 22
NONLINEAR PROPAGATION OF WAVE PACKETS CLOTILDE FERMANIAN KAMMERER Ritsumeikan University, 21-1 - 21 and 22 Our aim in this lecture is to explain the proof of a recent Theorem obtained in collaboration
More information. A NOTE ON THE RESTRICTION THEOREM AND GEOMETRY OF HYPERSURFACES
. A NOTE ON THE RESTRICTION THEOREM AND GEOMETRY OF HYPERSURFACES FABIO NICOLA Abstract. A necessary condition is established for the optimal (L p, L 2 ) restriction theorem to hold on a hypersurface S,
More informationarxiv: v2 [math.ap] 30 Jul 2012
Blow up for some semilinear wave equations in multi-space dimensions Yi Zhou Wei Han. arxiv:17.536v [math.ap] 3 Jul 1 Abstract In this paper, we discuss a new nonlinear phenomenon. We find that in n space
More informationNonlinear aspects of Calderón-Zygmund theory
Ancona, June 7 2011 Overture: The standard CZ theory Consider the model case u = f in R n Overture: The standard CZ theory Consider the model case u = f in R n Then f L q implies D 2 u L q 1 < q < with
More informationTADAHIRO OH 0, 3 8 (T R), (1.5) The result in [2] is in fact stated for time-periodic functions: 0, 1 3 (T 2 ). (1.4)
PERIODIC L 4 -STRICHARTZ ESTIMATE FOR KDV TADAHIRO OH 1. Introduction In [], Bourgain proved global well-posedness of the periodic KdV in L T): u t + u xxx + uu x 0, x, t) T R. 1.1) The key ingredient
More informationON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM
ON WEAKLY NONLINEAR BACKWARD PARABOLIC PROBLEM OLEG ZUBELEVICH DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS THE BUDGET AND TREASURY ACADEMY OF THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 7, ZLATOUSTINSKY MALIY PER.,
More informationNew Proof of Hörmander multiplier Theorem on compact manifolds without boundary
New Proof of Hörmander multiplier Theorem on compact manifolds without boundary Xiangjin Xu Department of athematics Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, D, 21218, USA xxu@math.jhu.edu Abstract On compact
More informationLaplace s Equation. Chapter Mean Value Formulas
Chapter 1 Laplace s Equation Let be an open set in R n. A function u C 2 () is called harmonic in if it satisfies Laplace s equation n (1.1) u := D ii u = 0 in. i=1 A function u C 2 () is called subharmonic
More informationMicrolocal Methods in X-ray Tomography
Microlocal Methods in X-ray Tomography Plamen Stefanov Purdue University Lecture I: Euclidean X-ray tomography Mini Course, Fields Institute, 2012 Plamen Stefanov (Purdue University ) Microlocal Methods
More informationIncoming and disappearaing solutions of Maxwell s equations. Université Bordeaux I
1 / 27 Incoming and disappearaing solutions of Maxwell s equations Vesselin Petkov (joint work with F. Colombini and J. Rauch) Université Bordeaux I MSRI, September 9th, 2010 Introduction 2 / 27 0. Introduction
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.ap] 20 Nov 2007
Long range scattering for the Maxwell-Schrödinger system with arbitrarily large asymptotic data arxiv:0711.3100v1 [math.ap] 20 Nov 2007 J. Ginibre Laboratoire de Physique Théorique Université de Paris
More informationON WEIGHTED INEQUALITIES FOR FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF RADIAL FUNCTIONS. dy, 0 < γ < n. x y
ON WEIGHTED INEQUALITIES FOR FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS OF RADIAL FUNCTIONS PABLO L. DE NÁPOLI, IRENE DRELICHMAN, AND RICARDO G. DURÁN Abstract. We prove a weighted version of the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality
More informationPartial Differential Equations
Part II Partial Differential Equations Year 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2015 Paper 4, Section II 29E Partial Differential Equations 72 (a) Show that the Cauchy problem for u(x,
More informationGlobal Solutions for a Nonlinear Wave Equation with the p-laplacian Operator
Global Solutions for a Nonlinear Wave Equation with the p-laplacian Operator Hongjun Gao Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics 188 Beijing, China To Fu Ma Departamento de Matemática
More informationExact fundamental solutions
Journées Équations aux dérivées partielles Saint-Jean-de-Monts, -5 juin 998 GDR 5 (CNRS) Exact fundamental solutions Richard Beals Abstract Exact fundamental solutions are known for operators of various
More informationRigidity and Non-rigidity Results on the Sphere
Rigidity and Non-rigidity Results on the Sphere Fengbo Hang Xiaodong Wang Department of Mathematics Michigan State University Oct., 00 1 Introduction It is a simple consequence of the maximum principle
More informationTHE WAVE EQUATION. d = 1: D Alembert s formula We begin with the initial value problem in 1 space dimension { u = utt u xx = 0, in (0, ) R, (2)
THE WAVE EQUATION () The free wave equation takes the form u := ( t x )u = 0, u : R t R d x R In the literature, the operator := t x is called the D Alembertian on R +d. Later we shall also consider the
More informationON THE UNIQUENESS OF SOLUTIONS TO THE GROSS-PITAEVSKII HIERARCHY. 1. Introduction
ON THE UNIQUENESS OF SOLUTIONS TO THE GROSS-PITAEVSKII HIERARCHY SERGIU KLAINERMAN AND MATEI MACHEDON Abstract. The purpose of this note is to give a new proof of uniqueness of the Gross- Pitaevskii hierarchy,
More informationNULL CONDITION FOR SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS. Fabio Catalano
Serdica Math J 25 (999), 32-34 NULL CONDITION FOR SEMILINEAR WAVE EQUATION WITH VARIABLE COEFFICIENTS Fabio Catalano Communicated by V Petkov Abstract In this work we analyse the nonlinear Cauchy problem
More informationOn Estimates of Biharmonic Functions on Lipschitz and Convex Domains
The Journal of Geometric Analysis Volume 16, Number 4, 2006 On Estimates of Biharmonic Functions on Lipschitz and Convex Domains By Zhongwei Shen ABSTRACT. Using Maz ya type integral identities with power
More informationPLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
This article was downloaded by: [Ingrid, Beltita] On: 2 March 29 Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 9976743] Publisher Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered
More informationESTIMATES FOR MAXIMAL SINGULAR INTEGRALS
ESTIMATES FOR MAXIMAL SINGULAR INTEGRALS LOUKAS GRAFAKOS Abstract. It is shown that maximal truncations of nonconvolution L -bounded singular integral operators with kernels satisfying Hörmander s condition
More informationPartial Differential Equations, 2nd Edition, L.C.Evans Chapter 5 Sobolev Spaces
Partial Differential Equations, nd Edition, L.C.Evans Chapter 5 Sobolev Spaces Shih-Hsin Chen, Yung-Hsiang Huang 7.8.3 Abstract In these exercises always denote an open set of with smooth boundary. As
More informationOn a Generalization of the Busemann Petty Problem
Convex Geometric Analysis MSRI Publications Volume 34, 1998 On a Generalization of the Busemann Petty Problem JEAN BOURGAIN AND GAOYONG ZHANG Abstract. The generalized Busemann Petty problem asks: If K
More informationDISPERSIVE EQUATIONS: A SURVEY
DISPERSIVE EQUATIONS: A SURVEY GIGLIOLA STAFFILANI 1. Introduction These notes were written as a guideline for a short talk; hence, the references and the statements of the theorems are often not given
More informationTitle: Localized self-adjointness of Schrödinger-type operators on Riemannian manifolds. Proposed running head: Schrödinger-type operators on
Title: Localized self-adjointness of Schrödinger-type operators on Riemannian manifolds. Proposed running head: Schrödinger-type operators on manifolds. Author: Ognjen Milatovic Department Address: Department
More informationSeong Joo Kang. Let u be a smooth enough solution to a quasilinear hyperbolic mixed problem:
Comm. Korean Math. Soc. 16 2001, No. 2, pp. 225 233 THE ENERGY INEQUALITY OF A QUASILINEAR HYPERBOLIC MIXED PROBLEM Seong Joo Kang Abstract. In this paper, e establish the energy inequalities for second
More informationElastic Waves in Exterior Domains Part II: Global Existence with a Null Structure
Metcalfe, J. and B. Thomases. (27) Elastic Waves in Exterior Domains Part II: Global Existence with a Null Structure, International Mathematics Research Notices, Vol. 27, Article ID rnm34, 43 pages. doi:1.193/imrn/rnm34
More informationCurriculum Vitae for Hart Smith - Updated April, 2016
Curriculum Vitae for Hart Smith - Updated April, 2016 Education Princeton University, 1984 1988. Ph.D. in Mathematics, January, 1989. Thesis supervisor: E. M. Stein. Thesis title: The subelliptic oblique
More informationOSCILLATORY SINGULAR INTEGRALS ON L p AND HARDY SPACES
POCEEDINGS OF THE AMEICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 24, Number 9, September 996 OSCILLATOY SINGULA INTEGALS ON L p AND HADY SPACES YIBIAO PAN (Communicated by J. Marshall Ash) Abstract. We consider boundedness
More informationMATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA
MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA For ω, consider an integral of the form I(ω) = e iωf(x) u(x) dx, where u Cc (R n ) complex valued, with support in a compact set K, and f C (R n ) real valued. Thus, I(ω)
More informationLp Bounds for Spectral Clusters. Compact Manifolds with Boundary
on Compact Manifolds with Boundary Department of Mathematics University of Washington, Seattle Hangzhou Conference on Harmonic Analysis and PDE s (M, g) = compact 2-d Riemannian manifold g = Laplacian
More informationLECTURE NOTES : INTRODUCTION TO DISPERSIVE PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
LECTURE NOTES : INTRODUCTION TO DISPERSIVE PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS NIKOLAOS TZIRAKIS Abstract. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a short and accessible introduction to the modern theory of
More informationREMARKS ON THE VANISHING OBSTACLE LIMIT FOR A 3D VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID
REMARKS ON THE VANISHING OBSTACLE LIMIT FOR A 3D VISCOUS INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID DRAGOŞ IFTIMIE AND JAMES P. KELLIHER Abstract. In [Math. Ann. 336 (2006), 449-489] the authors consider the two dimensional
More informationSTRICHARTZ ESTIMATES FOR SCHRÖDINGER OPERATORS WITH A NON-SMOOTH MAGNETIC POTENTIAL. Michael Goldberg. (Communicated by the associate editor name)
STICHATZ ESTIMATES FO SCHÖDINGE OPEATOS WITH A NON-SMOOTH MAGNETIC POTENTIA Michael Goldberg Department of Mathematics Johns Hopkins University 3400 N. Charles St. Baltimore, MD 228, USA Communicated by
More informationSYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS. Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S. L. Yadava. 1. Introduction
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 21, 2003, 211 226 SYMMETRY RESULTS FOR PERTURBED PROBLEMS AND RELATED QUESTIONS Massimo Grosi Filomena Pacella S.
More informationTwo dimensional exterior mixed problem for semilinear damped wave equations
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 31 (25) 366 377 www.elsevier.com/locate/jmaa Two dimensional exterior mixed problem for semilinear damped wave equations Ryo Ikehata 1 Department of Mathematics, Graduate School of
More informationGradient estimates for eigenfunctions on compact Riemannian manifolds with boundary
Gradient estimates for eigenfunctions on compact Riemannian manifolds with boundary Xiangjin Xu Department of athematics Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, D 21218 Abstract The purpose of this paper is
More informationPARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS. Lecturer: D.M.A. Stuart MT 2007
PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Lecturer: D.M.A. Stuart MT 2007 In addition to the sets of lecture notes written by previous lecturers ([1, 2]) the books [4, 7] are very good for the PDE topics in the course.
More informationOn m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry
On m-accretive Schrödinger operators in L p -spaces on manifolds of bounded geometry Ognjen Milatovic Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of North Florida Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA. Abstract
More informationA Critical Parabolic Sobolev Embedding via Littlewood-Paley Decomposition
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 01, no. 35, 1705-174 A Critical Parabolic Sobolev Embedding via Littlewood-Paley Decomposition H. Ibrahim Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences Mathematics
More informationSMOOTHING ESTIMATES OF THE RADIAL SCHRÖDINGER PROPAGATOR IN DIMENSIONS n 2
Acta Mathematica Scientia 1,3B(6):13 19 http://actams.wipm.ac.cn SMOOTHING ESTIMATES OF THE RADIAL SCHRÖDINGER PROPAGATOR IN DIMENSIONS n Li Dong ( ) Department of Mathematics, University of Iowa, 14 MacLean
More informationDerivatives of Harmonic Bergman and Bloch Functions on the Ball
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 26, 1 123 (21) doi:1.16/jmaa.2.7438, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Derivatives of Harmonic ergman and loch Functions on the all oo
More informationTHE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS
THE FORM SUM AND THE FRIEDRICHS EXTENSION OF SCHRÖDINGER-TYPE OPERATORS ON RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLDS OGNJEN MILATOVIC Abstract. We consider H V = M +V, where (M, g) is a Riemannian manifold (not necessarily
More informationDissipative quasi-geostrophic equations with L p data
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. (), No. 56, pp. 3. ISSN: 7-669. URL: http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu (login: ftp) Dissipative quasi-geostrophic
More informationAALBORG UNIVERSITY. Compactly supported curvelet type systems. Kenneth N. Rasmussen and Morten Nielsen. R November 2010
AALBORG UNIVERSITY Compactly supported curvelet type systems by Kenneth N Rasmussen and Morten Nielsen R-2010-16 November 2010 Department of Mathematical Sciences Aalborg University Fredrik Bajers Vej
More informationOn the role of geometry in scattering theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equations
On the role of geometry in scattering theory for nonlinear Schrödinger equations Rémi Carles (CNRS & Université Montpellier 2) Orléans, April 9, 2008 Free Schrödinger equation on R n : i t u + 1 2 u =
More informationCourse Description for Real Analysis, Math 156
Course Description for Real Analysis, Math 156 In this class, we will study elliptic PDE, Fourier analysis, and dispersive PDE. Here is a quick summary of the topics will study study. They re described
More informationON WEAK SOLUTION OF A HYPERBOLIC DIFFERENTIAL INCLUSION WITH NONMONOTONE DISCONTINUOUS NONLINEAR TERM
Internat. J. Math. & Math. Sci. Vol. 22, No. 3 (999 587 595 S 6-72 9922587-2 Electronic Publishing House ON WEAK SOLUTION OF A HYPERBOLIC DIFFERENTIAL INCLUSION WITH NONMONOTONE DISCONTINUOUS NONLINEAR
More informationNonlinear stabilization via a linear observability
via a linear observability Kaïs Ammari Department of Mathematics University of Monastir Joint work with Fathia Alabau-Boussouira Collocated feedback stabilization Outline 1 Introduction and main result
More informationGlobal well-posedness for semi-linear Wave and Schrödinger equations. Slim Ibrahim
Global well-posedness for semi-linear Wave and Schrödinger equations Slim Ibrahim McMaster University, Hamilton ON University of Calgary, April 27th, 2006 1 1 Introduction Nonlinear Wave equation: ( 2
More informationStrichartz estimates for the Schrödinger equation on polygonal domains
estimates for the Schrödinger equation on Joint work with Matt Blair (UNM), G. Austin Ford (Northwestern U) and Sebastian Herr (U Bonn and U Düsseldorf)... With a discussion of previous work with Andrew
More informationarxiv: v5 [math.ap] 5 Sep 2015
arxiv:3.745v5 [math.ap] 5 Sep 5 ON WEIGHTED L ESTIMATES FOR SOLUTIONS OF THE WAVE EUATION YOUNGWOO KOH AND IHYEOK SEO Abstract. In this paper we consider weighted L integrability for solutions of the wave
More informationOn the Cauchy problem of 3-D energy-critical Schrödinger equations with subcritical perturbations
J. Differential Equations 30 (006 4 445 www.elsevier.com/locate/jde On the Cauchy problem of 3-D energy-critical Schrödinger equations with subcritical perturbations Xiaoyi Zhang Academy of Mathematics
More informationAsymptotic Behavior for Semi-Linear Wave Equation with Weak Damping
Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 15, 713-718 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com Asymptotic Behavior for Semi-Linear Wave Equation with Weak Damping Ducival Carvalho Pereira State University
More informationA SHARP STABILITY ESTIMATE IN TENSOR TOMOGRAPHY
A SHARP STABILITY ESTIMATE IN TENSOR TOMOGRAPHY PLAMEN STEFANOV 1. Introduction Let (M, g) be a compact Riemannian manifold with boundary. The geodesic ray transform I of symmetric 2-tensor fields f is
More informationSolutions to the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation in Hyperbolic Space
Solutions to the Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation in Hyperbolic Space SPUR Final Paper, Summer 2014 Peter Kleinhenz Mentor: Chenjie Fan Project suggested by Gigliola Staffilani July 30th, 2014 Abstract In
More informationANALYTIC SMOOTHING EFFECT FOR NONLI TitleSCHRÖDINGER EQUATION IN TWO SPACE DIMENSIONS. Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics.
ANALYTIC SMOOTHING EFFECT FOR NONLI TitleSCHRÖDINGER EQUATION IN TWO SPACE DIMENSIONS Author(s) Hoshino, Gaku; Ozawa, Tohru Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 51(3) Issue 014-07 Date Text Version publisher
More informationThe Dirichlet problem for non-divergence parabolic equations with discontinuous in time coefficients in a wedge
The Dirichlet problem for non-divergence parabolic equations with discontinuous in time coefficients in a wedge Vladimir Kozlov (Linköping University, Sweden) 2010 joint work with A.Nazarov Lu t u a ij
More informationHeat equations with singular potentials: Hardy & Carleman inequalities, well-posedness & control
Outline Heat equations with singular potentials: Hardy & Carleman inequalities, well-posedness & control IMDEA-Matemáticas & Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Spain enrique.zuazua@uam.es Analysis and control
More informationDaniel M. Oberlin Department of Mathematics, Florida State University. January 2005
PACKING SPHERES AND FRACTAL STRICHARTZ ESTIMATES IN R d FOR d 3 Daniel M. Oberlin Department of Mathematics, Florida State University January 005 Fix a dimension d and for x R d and r > 0, let Sx, r) stand
More informationAnalysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version
Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version Frank Pacard To cite this version: Frank Pacard. Analysis in weighted spaces : preliminary version. 3rd cycle. Téhéran (Iran, 2006, pp.75.
More information