LCLS S-band Structure Coupler

Transcription

1 LCLS S-band Structure Coupler Zenghai Li Advanced Computations Department Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS S-band L01/L02 Coupler Review Nov. 03, 2004

2 Overview Motivation Modeling tools Multipole field analysis of SLC structure coupler Dual-feed coupler design for LCLS New coupler dimensions Summary

3 Motivation Low emittance beam is required for the LCLS. Beam is low in energy and large in beam size in L01 & L02 structures whose couplers have single feeds. The existing design has been corrected for amplitude asymmetry but not the phase so could affect beam emittance. We study the head-tail effects of dipole & quadrupole fields in the couplers via full 3D field analysis to determine if Re-design is necessary.

4 SLC Structure Couplers Both input/output couplers use single feed Dipole field minimized with racetrack cell profile & center offset Quadrupole field is not corrected RF phase term is not fully compensated important for both dipole and quadrupole components Input Output

5 Blue Book Estimation of Dipole Field E x Ez = Ez0 1 + e Ez0 2a x j ωt kz+ Φ 2a John Schmerge cpx /m Linac Phase ( ) quadrupole dipole Head-tail angle~0.24mrad ε σ px = ε + 4 mc 2 11 n final n initial εβ/ γ px = ε n initia(1 + ) 8ε mc Head-tail emittance dilution n 2 n initial 2 2

6 Head-tail Requirements Head-tail requirements for 2% emittance growth (Cecile) 10-ps bunch (with option for 20-ps bunch) Quad: rad/m Dipole: 0.06 mrad Dipole field is found to be too large Full field analysis and re-design needed

7 Simulation Tools Generalized Yee Grid Finite-Element Discretization Tau3P/T3P Omega3P S3P Time Domain Simulation With Excitations Frequency Domain Mode Calculation Scattering Matrix Evaluation Track3P Particle Tracking with Surface Physics V3D Visualization/Animation of Meshes, Particles & Fields S3P (3D Parallel S matrix solver) used in Coupler Design and generates 3D field maps for particle tracking Beam dynamics analysis of head-tail effects by tracking particles in S3P fields to find multipole moments in transverse momentum

8 SLC S-Band Coupler S3P Model RF in RF out Dimensions directly from SLC drawings Input coupler reflection from S3P is about mm offset For field symmetry

9 Field Asymmetry In Coupler On-axis Ey and Bx are non-zero in the coupler region Head-tail effects expected

10 Beam Dynamics Analysis Equation of motion: Transverse momentum: To first order: v d( γβ ) dt v je jωt jζ z Pm = E (, r θ, z, m) e dzdζ ω z e v v v = ( E+ cβ B) m c jζzz jζzz z(, θ,, ζ z) = m m( ηr )cos( θ) + m m( ηr )sin( θ) m= 0 m= 0 E r z A J r m e B J r m e where η + ζ = 2 2 r z 2 ω 2 c v je ηr A0 ηra1 ηrb1 ηr A2 ηrb 2 P ( ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ = xx0 + yy0) + x0 + y0 + ( xx0 yy0) + ( yx0 + xy0) ω focusing dipole quad skew quad

11 g Dependence Of Momentum Multipoles 1/g dependence for azimuthal focusing (back-to-back couplers in full structure for our case) Adiabatic damping RF focusing I01 I02 I03 I11 I12 I13+ I14 γ( ) βr( ) = γ( ) βr( ) ra ( ) γ γ γ γ where I are integrals of E field mn z Dipole and quadrupole terms are g independent.

12 Multipole Field Analysis RF in RF out Use S3P to obtain 3D fields in a symmetric model Calculate change in particle momentum through the input coupler Multipole decomposition to obtain dipole & quadrupole contributions

13 Dipole & Quad Fields in Original Couplers Bunch ±5 0 in RF phase, on crest, E acc =20MV/m Beam energy (g) Dipole: (γβ ) Quad: D(gβ^)/m Dipole head-tail angle q (rad) Quadrupole head-tail angle q (rad/m) Input coupler ~ Output coupler ~

14 t( s) Field Distribution In Structure Normalized Voltage Input Emitted Reflected F0= GHz Q0= Qext=20000 SLC structure Constant gradient for uniform input Gradient profile follow SLED (field) pulse shape Input: 0.76*E ave Phase (deg) t( s) Output: 1.24*E ave Head-tail estimated assuming constant gradient along structure

15 Head Tail Effects In L01 & L02 For dipole fields: Location γ Lattice β σ11 px σ11 px n final = n initial + = n initial mc 8ε n initial mc ε ε ε σ = σ = ε β / γ 11 2 x n (1 ) L01 Input L01 Output L02 Input L02 Output /18 13/39 Head-tail emittance dilution is quadratic to beam size and head-tail angle L01 input needs dual feed to minimize both dipole and quad L01 output likely does not need dual feed because (compared to L01 input) Factor of 2.6 smaller head-tail angle due to geometry Similar beam size L02 input needs dual feed because (compared to L01 input) 10 time high beam energy 30% higher gradient 20 times higher beta function

16 Dual-feed Coupler Design Designs considered: - Dual-feed with cylindrical cell - Dual-feed with slot compensation - Dual-feed with racetrack cell profile Only vary dimensions of the coupler cell to match Coupling iris rounded

17 Dual-feed Input Coupler Design Comparison quad ( )/m original single-feed cylindrical dual-feed cross dual-feed racetrack dual-feed rf phase (degree) Input coupler: comparison of quad head-tail (γβ )/m: 10 Degree bunch (γβ )/m Head-tail angle q (rad/m) SLAC Single feed Symmetric dual Race-track dual Cross Dual

18 Design Choice For L01/L02 Couplers Dual-feed with racetrack cell profile Dipole field is zero by symmetry Input coupler: comparison of quad head-tail (γβ )/m: 10 Degree bunch (γβ )/m Head-tail angle q (rad/m) SLAC Single feed Race-track dual

19 Rounding of Iris Radius 18 MV/m gradient with average T f = 830 ns Iris rounding of 1 mm - T~7 0 C

20 Dual-feed Input Coupler Dimensions

21 Dual-Feed Input Coupler Dimensions Table Parameters Beam pipe diameter Beam pipe cutoff hole rounding R Racetrack arc radius b Racetrack arc separation d Cell iris radius a Disk thickness t Disk rounding radius R Disk flat part tf Coupling iris opening w Coupling iris rounding r Waveguide width Wg Waveguide height hg Dimension at 45 0 C Dimension at 20 0 C ( ) * * * * Note: *) numbers from the old SLC drawing, not scaled

22 Tolerances On Input Coupler Matching 0.05 S11_imag 0 design cell radius off -0.02mm arc center off -0.02mm iris width off -0.02mm wg location off -0.02mm S11_real

23 Summary Performed 3D multipole field analysis of the SLC coupler Dipole and quadrupole fields in existing design were found too large to meet the LCLS beam emittance requirements. Dual-feed input coupler with racetrack cell profile has been designed for the L01 & L02 structures to eliminate the dipole fields and minimize the quadrupole fields. Coupler dimensions were generated for mechanical design Single-feed output coupler needs further evaluation and dual-feed design will proceed as needed