MAGNETIC FIELD ERRORS: RECONCILING MEASUREMENT, MODELING AND EMPIRICAL CORRECTIONS ON DIII D
|
|
- Gregory Moore
- 2 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MAGNETIC FIELD ERRORS: RECONCILING MEASUREMENT, MODELING AND EMPIRICAL CORRECTIONS ON DIII D by M.J. Schaffer, T.E. Evans, J.L. Luxon, G.L. Jackson, J.A. Leuer, J.T. Scoville Paper QP1.76 Presented at the 44th APS-DPP Annual Meeting Orlando, FL 22 Nov 11 15
2 Introduction! Non-axisymmetric magnetic errors can have deleterious effects on tokamak plasmas.! Interaction between magnetic field errors and plasmas must be understood to rationally design effective error correction systems for future magnetically confined fusion experiments.! A correction coil set (C-coil) compensates errors in DIII D since 1994.! Uses empirical algorithms.! Magnetic errors in DIII D were carefully remeasured in 21 Nov. The empirically optimized correction fields add to, (not cancel) the measured errors.! We attempt to understand this puzzling error plasma interaction through numerical magnetic line tracing.
3 Magnet Coils of Main Interest for Error Analysis DIII D in Year 21-2 F Coils (Poloidal Field Coils) DIII D F-Coils (Poloidal Field Coils) F8A F9A F5A F4A F7A F3A SHOT 12115, t = 1155 ms F2A F6A F1A F1B F2B F6B F3B F4B F7B C Coil Set (Correction Coils) B Coil (Toroidal Field Coil) F5B F8B F9B
4 Some DIII D Magnetic Error Background! 199: Measured F coil errors (LaHaye & Scoville).! 1994: Installed Correction coil (C coil).! : Developed empirical algorithms (with theoretical guidance) to minimize low-density mode locking (LaHaye & Scoville).! Empirical correction did not match 199 measured errors (LaHaye).! 2 1: Error field amplification by plasma increases sensitivity to errors. New empirical C coil algorithms to minimize plasma rotation braking in Resistive Wall Mode studies are not greatly different. (Garofalo).! All empirical algorithms contain strong dependence on B T.! Imply 7 gauss m,n = 2,1 B-coil component at q = 2 surface.! Is there an unknown error from toroidal field coil?! 21 Sept: Decided to do through search for and measurement of magnetic errors in DIII D.
5 ERROR MEASUREMENTS
6 In-Vessel Probe Array for Error Measurements was Rebuilt! Octagonal frame disassembles to enter DIII D (LaHaye). VIEW FROM ABOVE! Frame slides vertically along four legs. B Z! Planar spiral inductive probes on printed circuit boards (Jackson).! 3 components (B R, B φ, B Z ), each at 8 toroidal locations. 9 B φ B R R = m 27! Reassembly inside DIII D Must maintain planarity, circularity and centering of the array. Must maintain orientation of the probes. 18! Other probes distributed outside and in central bore.
7 In-Vessel Array, Illustrating Magnetic Pickups and Hoist
8 Measurement Coordinate System Is Chosen for Ability to Reproduce It! Make all in-vessel measurements in one reproducible vertical cylindrical coordinate system (right handed). Vertical Toroidal Z φ After every change of array position:! Make array level and flat to gravity! Center probe circle on vessel inner wall 8 radial scales bolted to vessel 8 plumb bobs hang from probe array ±.5 mm centering reproducibility! Check array circularity! Level B Z probes. Plumb B R and B φ, probes. Also: ±.5 rad ±.3û reproducibility Measurement Surface in Space! Rotated array 65º once, to separate probe errors from true δb, also to synthesize 16 element array. Vessel central wall Probe Array 8 for each B-com ponent Radial scales (8)
9 RESULTS
10 MAIN RESULT: The Largest Magnetic Errors in DIII D Are Shifts of F Coil Centers with Respect to the Toroidal Magnetic Field! Other errors are much smaller: COIL MAGNETIC CENTERS (mm) REFERRED TO MEASUREMENT AXIS AT MID PLANE 9 Centerpost nonuniformities 12 6 Old N = 1 coil frame B coil feeds Iron diagnostic shields 15 5 B T Inner F-coils (open symbols) 3! NO LARGE NEW ERROR SOURCE WAS FOUND.! Newly measured shifts are mostly smaller than from 199 data.! i.e., DIII D has smaller magnetic errors than thought previously Outer F-coils (solid symbols) 24 5 F7A mm 3 33 B TOR F1A F2A F3A F4A F5A F8A F9A F7A F6A F6B F7B F9B F8B F5B F4B F3B F2B F1B
11 RESULTS: F Coils Are Also Tilted F-COIL TILTS (deg)! Newly measured tilts are less than inferred from 199 measurements. REFERRED TO MEASUREMENT AXIS AT MID PLANE ! The old N = 1 coil ferromagnetic frame tilted the fields of the uppermost F-coils in Points on figure show tilt of coil plane, upward at the toroidal angle shown B T.1 deg 3 33 B TOR F1A F2A F3A F4A F5A F8A F9A F7A F6A F6B F7B F9B F8B F5B F4B F3B F2B F1B
12 ANALYSIS
13 Magnetic Line Tracing Code is the Main Tool Used to Date! DIII D version of the TRIP3D line tracing code (T.E. Evans)! Axisymmetric equilibrium B is calculated from an EFIT g-file! Can independently shift and tilt toroidal and poloidal fields of the equilibrium (rigid shifts and tilts)! Can change B Tor magnitude (usually to change q)! Shifted F coils! Code subtracts the concentric F coil contribution to B Pol from the equilibrium, so only the error part remains! F coil tilt is not yet implemented in TRIP3D! C coil fields! But: NO PLASMA RESPONSE to errors
14 Magnetic Line Tracing Model Results: Off-Center F Coils Alone Make Modest ( 2 cm-wide) 2,1 Islands, if Plasma Current Follows B T z (m).5 Plasma Current Centered on B T. No C-Coil Current. At phi = deg Ro = Zo = (m) h6 Coil-Center Locations on Measurement Coordinates 9 B T Plasma J R 18 F6A F7B F6B 5mm F7A Equilibrium fields from shot Limited, nearly circular (κ 1.15) for simplicity. Measured Coil Centers Case: Plasma Current centered on B T. (No C-Coil Current) (No tilts)
15 Magnetic Line Tracing Model Results: Off-Center F Coils Alone Make Modest ( 2 cm-wide) 2,1 Islands, if Plasma Current Follows B T.8 r (m).6 Plasma Current Centered on B T. No C-Coil Current. 3,1 2,1 At phi = deg h6 Coil-Center Locations on Measurement Coordinates F6A F7B B T Plasma J 5mm F6B.2 F7A Poloidal Angle CCW from Outer Midpoint (deg) Equilibrium fields are from shot 12115, q() 1.13, Limited, nearly circular (κ 1.15) for simplicity. 27 Measured Coil Centers Case: Plasma Current Centered on B T. (No C-Coil Current) (No tilts)
16 Magnetic Line Tracing Model Results: Off-Center F Coils Alone Make LARGE Islands if Plasma Current Centers on External B Pol r (m) Plasma Current Centered Near F-Coils (5 mm φ = 22 ). No C-Current..8 At phi = deg h6.1 B T F6A F7B 5mm F6B.4 Plasma J F7A Poloidal Angle CCW from Outer Midpoint (deg)! Islands are MUCH LARGER if plasma current is centered near F Coil centers instead of B T, and Some surface breakup is visible. 27 Measured Coil Centers Case: Plasma Current Centered on F-Coils. (No C-Coil Current) (No tilts)
17 Magnetic Line Tracing Model Results: Adding Experimental C Coil Field Makes LARGE ( 6 cm) 2,1 Islands if Plasma Current Follows B T.8 r (m) Plasma Current Centered on B T. With C-Coil Current. 3,1 At phi = deg h ,1 B T Plasma J 18 F6A F7B 5mm.4 F6B F7A C-Coil B Poloidal Angle CCW from Outer Midpoint (deg)! It appears that the C coil does not achieve its empirical correction by moving the external poloidal B so that all B and J components are more or less centered on B T. 1,1 Measured Coil Centers. Case: Plasma Current Centered on B T, Plus C Coil Current. (No tilts)
18 Magnetic Line Tracing Model Results: Adding Experimental C Coil Field Makes Still LARGER Islands if Plasma Current Centers on External B Pol r (m) Plasma Current Centered Near F-Coils (5 mm φ = 22 ). With C-Current..8 At phi = deg h ,1 18 F6A F7B B T 5mm F6B.4 Plasma J F7A C-Coil B Poloidal Angle CCW from Outer Midpoint (deg)! It appears that the C coil does not achieve its empirical correction by moving B T so that all B and J components are more or less centered on the external poloidal B. 27 Measured Coil Centers. Case: Plasma Current Centered on F-Coils, Plus C-Coil Current (No tilts)
19 RIGID SHIFT of the Plasma Toroidal Current by 4.7 mm, 27 from B T Virtually Eliminates 2,1 Islands in Presence of Experimental C Coil Field.8 r (m) B T, F & C-Coils as in Experiment, Plasma Shifted to Minimize 2,1 Islands 3,1 At phi = deg 9.6 B T Plasma J 18 F6A F7B 5mm.4 F6B.2 1, Poloidal Angle CCW from Outer Midpoint (deg)! If the C Coil current minimizes empirical manifestations of islands, it would appear to push the plasma far from any static B (if only shifts are considered). F7A 27 C-Coil B F Coils. B Coil. C Coil Current. Case: Shift Plasma Current to get small 2,1 islands. (No tilts)
20 2,1 Island Width with Optimally Shifted Current is <.5 cm (Limited by My Patience to do 2 Parameter Scan).65 B T, F & C-Coils as in Experiment, Plasma Shifted to Minimize 2,1 Islands At phi = deg 9.6 B T Plasma J 18 F6A F7B 5mm F6B Poloidal Angle CCW from Outer Midpoint (deg) Expanded view near q = 2 surface of previous slide. F7A 27 C-Coil B F Coils. B Coil. C Coil Current. Case: Shift Plasma Current to get small 2,1 islands. (No tilts)
21 TILT of the Plasma Toroidal Current by.33 rad (5.7 mm at R o ) Reduces 2,1 Islands if Plasma Current Centers on External B Pol Plasma Current Centered on B T, Tilted to Reduce 2,1 Islands. With C-Current..8 r (m) 3,1 At phi = deg h F6A F7B B T Plasma J 5mm F6B Poloidal Angle CCW from Outer Midpoint (deg)! Magnetic surfaces near q = 1 are helically distorted. However, the plasma current tilt found here is approximately opposite to the surfaces tilt component.! Therefore, this arrangement seems inconsistent. F7A 27 C-Coil B Measured Coil Centers. Plasma Current Centered near B-Coil. C-Coil Current Case: Tilt Plasma Current to get small 2,1 islands.
22 Discussion! Presumably, the empirical C coil correction distorts magnetic surfaces and currents in a self consistent equilibrium way that simultaneously makes magnetic islands small.! The C coil field is imperfect cannot correct all the B error.! The C coil field alone distorts magnetic surfaces near q = 1 helically.! A small helical distortion near q = 1 is the same as tilt plus shift.! Suggests that the empirically corrected plasmas may be helically (1,1) distorted yet still island-free.! Line tracing code just sums specified B-fields; no self consistent equilibrium.! So far, pushing the plasma around to gain insight and to try to find a distorted magnetic shape that seems qualitatively matched to the plasma current has not yielded a candidate solution.! F coil tilts have not yet been implemented in TRIP3D.! But they would add complication rather than insight.
23 Discussion & Conclusions! DIII D magnetic errors were measured well. No large unknown errors discovered.! The EMPIRICALLY OPTIMIZED C Coil field INCREASES island size, unless plasma current shifts AWAY from F and B Coil centers and/or tilts in response.! Is this expected?! Maybe. Tilt + Shift (1,1) helix.! I claim, We do not yet understand some important physics feature of the plasma response to magnetic errors.! We must understand how plasma responds to errors and imperfect corrections, in order to rationally design and operate correction coils in the future.! We plan to use MARS code (by Bondeson) to study self-consistent stable 3-D plasma response to external error fields.! MARS physics (linearized resistive MHD, plasma rotation, viscous damping) is appropriate for this purpose.
24 Related Papers at this Meeting LO1.13 Modeling 3-D Effects in the DIII-D Boundary, T.E. Evans, R.A. Moyer (UCSD), D. Reiter, S.V. Kasilov (IPP Forschungszentrum Jülich), A.M. Runov (MPI) QP D Equilibrium and Magnetic Island due to Error Magnetic Field in the DIII-D Tokamak, L.L. Lao, M.S. Chu, M.J. Schaffer, R.J. La Haye, T.E. Evans (General Atomics), K.I. You (KBSI), E.A. Lazarus, S.P. Hirshman (ORNL) QP1.77 Investigation of Resonant and Non-resonant Magnetic Braking in Plasmas Above the No-Wall Beta Limit, J.T. Scoville, E.J. Strait, R.J. La Haye (General Atomics), A.M. Garofalo, H. Reimerdes (Columbia U.), M. Okabayashi (PPPL) QP1.8 Modeling and Design of a Resistive Wall Mode Stabilization System With Internal Field Coils in DIII-D, G.L. Jackson, A.G. Kellman, P.M. Anderson, R.J. La Haye, A. Nerem, J.T. Scoville, E.J. Strait (General Atomics), G.A. Navratil, J. Bialek, A.M. Garofalo, H. Reimerdes, (Columbia U.), R. Hatcher, L.C. Johnson, M. Okabayashi (PPPL) QP1.81 Critical Rotation for Stabilization of n=1 Ideal Kink (Resistive Wall Mode) in DIII-D, R.J. La Haye, M.S. Chu, E.J. Strait (General Atomics), A.M. Garofalo, H. Reimerdes (Columbia U.), M. Okabayashi (PPPL) QP1.82 Feedback Stabilization of the Resistive Wall Mode in Low-Rotation DIII-D Plasmas, M. Okabayashi, L.C. Johnson (PPPL), J. Bialek, A.M. Garofalo, G.A. Navratil, H. Reimerdes (Columbia U.), R.J. La Haye, J.T. Scoville, E.J. Strait, DIII-D Team (GA) QP1.83 Active Measurement of the Resistive Wall Mode Stability in Rotating DIII-D Plasmas, H. Reimerdes, A.M. Garofalo, G.A. Navratil (Columbia U.), M.S. Chu, G.L. Jackson, T.H. Jensen, R.J. La~Haye, J.T. Scoville, E.J. Strait (GA), L.C. Johnson, M., Okabayashi (PPPL) QP1.84 Effects of Plasma Rotation and Dissipation on Resistive Wall Mode in Tokamaks, Y.B. Kim, D.H. Edgell, I.N. Bogatu, J.S. Kim (FARTECH) RP1.46 Evidence for Stochastic Effects in the DIII-D Boundary, R.A. Moyer (UCSD), T.E. Evans (GA), T.L. Rhodes (UCLA), J.G. Watkins (SNL), C.J. Lasnier (LLNL), H. Takahashi (PPPL)
Resistive Wall Mode Control in DIII-D
Resistive Wall Mode Control in DIII-D by Andrea M. Garofalo 1 for G.L. Jackson 2, R.J. La Haye 2, M. Okabayashi 3, H. Reimerdes 1, E.J. Strait 2, R.J. Groebner 2, Y. In 4, M.J. Lanctot 1, G.A. Navratil
DIII D. by M. Okabayashi. Presented at 20th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Vilamoura, Portugal November 1st - 6th, 2004.
Control of the Resistive Wall Mode with Internal Coils in the Tokamak (EX/3-1Ra) Active Measurement of Resistive Wall Mode Stability in Rotating High Beta Plasmas (EX/3-1Rb) by M. Okabayashi Presented
RWM FEEDBACK STABILIZATION IN DIII D: EXPERIMENT-THEORY COMPARISONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER
GA A24759 RWM FEEDBACK STABILIZATION IN DIII D: EXPERIMENT-THEORY COMPARISONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER by A.M. GAROFALO, J. BIALEK, M.S. CHANCE, M.S. CHU, D.H. EDGELL, G.L. JACKSON, T.H. JENSEN, R.J.
Effect of Resonant and Non-resonant Magnetic Braking on Error Field Tolerance in High Beta Plasmas
1 EX/5-3Ra Effect of Resonant and Non-resonant Magnetic Braking on Error Field Tolerance in High Beta Plasmas H. Reimerdes 1), A.M. Garofalo 2), E.J. Strait 2), R.J. Buttery 3), M.S. Chu 2), Y. In 4),
GA A26247 EFFECT OF RESONANT AND NONRESONANT MAGNETIC BRAKING ON ERROR FIELD TOLERANCE IN HIGH BETA PLASMAS
GA A26247 EFFECT OF RESONANT AND NONRESONANT MAGNETIC BRAKING ON ERROR FIELD TOLERANCE IN HIGH BETA PLASMAS by H. REIMERDES, A.M. GAROFALO, E.J. STRAIT, R.J. BUTTERY, M.S. CHU, Y. In, G.L. JACKSON, R.J.
RESISTIVE WALL MODE STABILIZATION RESEARCH ON DIII D STATUS AND RECENT RESULTS
RESISTIVE WALL MODE STABILIZATION RESEARCH ON STATUS AND RECENT RESULTS by A.M. Garofalo1 in collaboration with J. Bialek,1 M.S. Chance,2 M.S. Chu,3 T.H. Jensen,3 L.C. Johnson,2 R.J. La Haye,3 G.A. Navratil,1
Extended Lumped Parameter Model of Resistive Wall Mode and The Effective Self-Inductance
Extended Lumped Parameter Model of Resistive Wall Mode and The Effective Self-Inductance M.Okabayashi, M. Chance, M. Chu* and R. Hatcher A. Garofalo**, R. La Haye*, H. Remeirdes**, T. Scoville*, and T.
GA A26242 COMPREHENSIVE CONTROL OF RESISTIVE WALL MODES IN DIII-D ADVANCED TOKAMAK PLASMAS
GA A26242 COMPREHENSIVE CONTROL OF RESISTIVE WALL MODES IN DIII-D ADVANCED TOKAMAK PLASMAS by M. OKABAYASHI, I.N. BOGATU, T. BOLZONELLA, M.S. CHANCE, M.S. CHU, A.M. GAROFALO, R. HATCHER, Y. IN, G.L. JACKSON,
STABILIZATION OF THE RESISTIVE WALL MODE IN DIII D BY PLASMA ROTATION AND MAGNETIC FEEDBACK
GA A24014 STABILIZATION OF THE RESISTIVE WALL MODE IN DIII D BY PLASMA ROTATION AND MAGNETIC FEEDBACK by M. Okabayashi, J. Bialek, M.S. Chance, M.S. Chu, E.D. Fredrickson, A.M. Garofalo, R. Hatcher, T.H.
Dynamical plasma response of resistive wall modes to changing external magnetic perturbations
Dynamical plasma response of resistive wall modes to changing external magnetic perturbations M. Shilov, C. Cates, R. James, A. Klein, O. Katsuro-Hopkins, Y. Liu, M. E. Mauel, D. A. Maurer, G. A. Navratil,
Resistive wall mode stabilization by slow plasma rotation in DIII-D tokamak discharges with balanced neutral beam injection a
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS 14, 056101 2007 Resistive wall mode stabilization by slow plasma rotation in DIII-D tokamak discharges with balanced neutral beam injection a E. J. Strait, b A. M. Garofalo, c G. L.
Requirements for Active Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Feedback Control
Requirements for Active Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) Feedback Control Yongkyoon In 1 In collaboration with M.S. Chu 2, G.L. Jackson 2, J.S. Kim 1, R.J. La Haye 2, Y.Q. Liu 3, L. Marrelli 4, M. Okabayashi
Dynamical plasma response of resistive wall modes to changing external magnetic perturbations a
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS VOLUME 11, NUMBER 5 MAY 2004 Dynamical plasma response of resistive wall modes to changing external magnetic perturbations a M. Shilov, b) C. Cates, R. James, A. Klein, O. Katsuro-Hopkins,
Response of a Resistive and Rotating Tokamak to External Magnetic Perturbations Below the Alfven Frequency
Response of a Resistive and Rotating Tokamak to External Magnetic Perturbations Below the Alfven Freuency by M.S. Chu In collaboration with L.L. Lao, M.J. Schaffer, T.E. Evans E.J. Strait (General Atomics)
CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NEUTRAL BEAMLINE IRON TO PLASMA NON-AXISYMMETRIC FIELDS
GA A24838 CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE NEUTRAL BEAMLINE IRON TO PLASMA NON-AXISYMMETRIC FIELDS by J.L. LUXON MARCH 2005 QTYUIOP DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency
Effect of an error field on the stability of the resistive wall mode
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS 14, 022505 2007 Effect of an error field on the stability of the resistive wall mode Richard Fitzpatrick Institute for Fusion Studies, Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin,
A New Resistive Response to 3-D Fields in Low Rotation H-modes
in Low Rotation H-modes by Richard Buttery 1 with Rob La Haye 1, Yueqiang Liu 2, Bob Pinsker 1, Jong-kyu Park 3, Holger Reimerdes 4, Ted Strait 1, and the DIII-D research team. 1 General Atomics, USA 2
Interaction of scrape-off layer currents with magnetohydrodynamical instabilities in tokamak plasmas
Interaction of scrape-off layer currents with magnetohydrodynamical instabilities in tokamak plasmas Richard Fitzpatrick Institute for Fusion Studies Department of Physics University of Texas at Austin
Effects of Noise in Time Dependent RWM Feedback Simulations
Effects of Noise in Time Dependent RWM Feedback Simulations O. Katsuro-Hopkins, J. Bialek, G. Navratil (Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY USA) Building
Modeling of resistive wall mode and its control in experiments and ITER a
Modeling of resistive wall mode and its control in experiments and ITER a Yueqiang Liu b Department of Applied Mechanics, EURATOM/VR Fusion Association, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
RWM Control Code Maturity
RWM Control Code Maturity Yueqiang Liu EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Association Culham Science Centre Abingdon, Oxon OX14 3DB, UK Work partly funded by UK EPSRC and EURATOM. The views and opinions expressed do
Resistive Wall Mode Observation and Control in ITER-Relevant Plasmas
Resistive Wall Mode Observation and Control in ITER-Relevant Plasmas J. P. Levesque April 12, 2011 1 Outline Basic Resistive Wall Mode (RWM) model RWM stability, neglecting kinetic effects Sufficient for
ELM Suppression in DIII-D Hybrid Plasmas Using n=3 Resonant Magnetic Perturbations
1 EXC/P5-02 ELM Suppression in DIII-D Hybrid Plasmas Using n=3 Resonant Magnetic Perturbations B. Hudson 1, T.E. Evans 2, T.H. Osborne 2, C.C. Petty 2, and P.B. Snyder 2 1 Oak Ridge Institute for Science
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory. Multi-mode analysis of RWM feedback with the NMA Code
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Multi-mode analysis of RWM feedback with the NMA Code M. S. Chance, M.Okabayashi, M. S. Chu 12 th Workshop on MHD Stability Control: Improved MHD Control Configurations
KSTAR Equilibrium Operating Space and Projected Stabilization at High Normalized Beta
1 THS/P2-05 KSTAR Equilibrium Operating Space and Projected Stabilization at High Normalized Beta Y.S. Park 1), S.A. Sabbagh 1), J.W. Berkery 1), J.M. Bialek 1), Y.M. Jeon 2), S.H. Hahn 2), N. Eidietis
Supported by. Role of plasma edge in global stability and control*
NSTX Supported by College W&M Colorado Sch Mines Columbia U CompX General Atomics INL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics New York U Old Dominion U ORNL PPPL PSI Princeton U Purdue U
Comparison of Divertor Heat Flux Splitting by 3D Fields with Field Line Tracing Simulation in KSTAR
1 Comparison of Divertor Heat Flux Splitting by 3D Fields with Field Line Tracing Simulation in KSTAR W. Choe 1,2*, K. Kim 1,2, J.-W. Ahn 3, H.H. Lee 4, C.S. Kang 4, J.-K. Park 5, Y. In 4, J.G. Kwak 4,
GA A27444 PROBING RESISTIVE WALL MODE STABILITY USING OFF-AXIS NBI
GA A27444 PROBING RESISTIVE WALL MODE STABILITY USING OFF-AXIS NBI by J.M. HANSON, F. TURCO M.J. LANCTOT, J. BERKERY, I.T. CHAPMAN, R.J. LA HAYE, G.A. NAVRATIL, M. OKABAYASHI, H. REIMERDES, S.A. SABBAGH,
CSA$-9 k067s-~ STUDY OF THE RESISTIVE WALL MODE IN DIII-D GAMA22921 JULY 1998
STUDY OF THE RESISTIVE WALL MODE IN DIIID GAMA22921 CSA$9 k067s~ by A.M. GAROFALO, J. BIALEK, M.S. CHU, E.D. FREDRICKSON, R.J. GROEBNER, R.J. La HAYE, L.L. LAO, G.A. NAVRATIL, B.W. RICE, S.A. SABBAGH,
Plasma Stability in Tokamaks and Stellarators
Plasma Stability in Tokamaks and Stellarators Gerald A. Navratil GCEP Fusion Energy Workshop Princeton, NJ 1- May 006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Borrowed VGs from many colleagues: J. Bialek, A. Garofalo,R. Goldston,
GA A26123 PARTICLE, HEAT, AND SHEATH POWER TRANSMISSION FACTOR PROFILES DURING ELM SUPPRESSION EXPERIMENTS ON DIII-D
GA A26123 PARTICLE, HEAT, AND SHEATH POWER TRANSMISSION FACTOR PROFILES DURING ELM SUPPRESSION EXPERIMENTS ON DIII-D by J.G. WATKINS, T.E. EVANS, I. JOSEPH, C.J. LASNIER, R.A. MOYER, D.L. RUDAKOV, O. SCHMITZ,
Derivation of dynamo current drive in a closed current volume and stable current sustainment in the HIT SI experiment
Derivation of dynamo current drive and stable current sustainment in the HIT SI experiment 1 Derivation of dynamo current drive in a closed current volume and stable current sustainment in the HIT SI experiment
QTYUIOP LOCAL ANALYSIS OF CONFINEMENT AND TRANSPORT IN NEUTRAL BEAM HEATED DIII D DISCHARGES WITH NEGATIVE MAGNETIC SHEAR D.P. SCHISSEL.
LOCAL ANALYSIS OF CONFINEMENT AND TRANSPORT IN NEUTRAL BEAM HEATED DIII D DISCHARGES WITH NEGATIVE MAGNETIC SHEAR Presented by D.P. SCHISSEL for the DIII D Team* Presented to 16th IAEA Fusion Conference
The Effects of Noise and Time Delay on RWM Feedback System Performance
The Effects of Noise and Time Delay on RWM Feedback System Performance O. Katsuro-Hopkins, J. Bialek, G. Navratil (Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York,
TARGET PLATE CONDITIONS DURING STOCHASTIC BOUNDARY OPERATION ON DIII D
GA A25445 TARGET PLATE CONDITIONS DURING STOCHASTIC BOUNDARY OPERATION ON DIII D by J.G. WATKINS, T.E. EVANS, C.J. LASNIER, R.A. MOYER, and D.L. RUDAKOV JUNE 2006 QTYUIOP DISCLAIMER This report was prepared
GA A24699 SUPPRESSION OF LARGE EDGE LOCALIZED MODES IN HIGH CONFINEMENT DIII D PLASMAS WITH A STOCHASTIC MAGNETIC BOUNDARY
GA A24699 SUPPRESSION OF LARGE EDGE LOCALIZED MODES IN HIGH CONFINEMENT DIII D PLASMAS WITH A STOCHASTIC MAGNETIC BOUNDARY by T.E. EVANS, R.A. MOYER, J.G. WATKINS, P.R. THOMAS, J.A. BOEDO, M.E. FENSTERMACHER,
Effects of stellarator transform on sawtooth oscillations in CTH. Jeffrey Herfindal
Effects of stellarator transform on sawtooth oscillations in CTH Jeffrey Herfindal D.A. Ennis, J.D. Hanson, G.J. Hartwell, E.C. Howell, C.A. Johnson, S.F. Knowlton, X. Ma, D.A. Maurer, M.D. Pandya, N.A.
NIMROD FROM THE CUSTOMER S PERSPECTIVE MING CHU. General Atomics. Nimrod Project Review Meeting July 21 22, 1997
NIMROD FROM THE CUSTOMER S PERSPECTIVE MING CHU General Atomics Nimrod Project Review Meeting July 21 22, 1997 Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant DE-FG03-95ER54309 and Contract
Electron Thermal Transport Within Magnetic Islands in the RFP
Electron Thermal Transport Within Magnetic Islands in the RFP Hillary Stephens University of Wisconsin Madison APS-DPP Meeting November 3, 2009 J.R. Amubel, M.T. Borchardt, D.J. Den Hartog, C.C. Hegna,
Plasma Shape Feedback Control on EAST
1 EXC/P2-09 Plasma Shape Feedback Control on EAST Q.P. Yuan 1), B.J. Xiao 1), Z.P. Luo 1), M.L. Walker 2), A.S. Welander 2), A. Hyatt 2), J.P. Qian 1), D.A. Humphreys 2), J.A. Leuer 2), R.D. Johnson 2),
Dynamic Resonant Error Field Correction with C-COIL and I-COIL in the DIIID device
Dynamic Resnant Errr Field Crrectin with C-COIL and I-COIL in the DIIID device M. Okabayashi, M.S. Chance, R, Hatcher, J. Manickam P P P L, J. Bialek, A.M. Garfal, G.A. Navratil, H. Reimerdes, C lumbia
The Status of the Design and Construction of the Columbia Non-neutral Torus
The Status of the Design and Construction of the Columbia Non-neutral Torus J. P. Kremer,T.S.Pedersen,N.Pomphrey,W.Reiersen and F. Dahlgren Dept. of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University,
Control of Sawtooth Oscillation Dynamics using Externally Applied Stellarator Transform. Jeffrey Herfindal
Control of Sawtooth Oscillation Dynamics using Externally Applied Stellarator Transform Jeffrey Herfindal D.A. Ennis, J.D. Hanson, G.J. Hartwell, S.F. Knowlton, X. Ma, D.A. Maurer, M.D. Pandya, N.A. Roberds,
INITIAL EVALUATION OF COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR STABILITY OF COMPACT STELLARATOR REACTOR DESIGNS
INITIAL EVALUATION OF COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR STABILITY OF COMPACT STELLARATOR REACTOR DESIGNS A.D. Turnbull and L.L. Lao General Atomics (with contributions from W.A. Cooper and R.G. Storer) Presentation
Measurement and modeling of three-dimensional equilibria in DIII-D
Measurement and modeling of three-dimensional equilibria in DIII-D M. J. Lanctot, H. Reimerdes, A. M. Garofalo, M. S. Chu, J. M. Hanson et al. Citation: Phys. Plasmas 18, 056121 (2011); doi: 10.1063/1.3593009
INTERACTION OF AN EXTERNAL ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELD WITH THE PLASMA TEARING MODE SURROUNDED BY A RESISTIVE WALL
INTERACTION OF AN EXTERNAL ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELD WITH THE PLASMA TEARING MODE SURROUNDED BY A RESISTIVE WALL S.C. GUO* and M.S. CHU GENERAL ATOMICS *Permanent Address: Consorzio RFX, Padova, Italy **The
Non-Solenoidal Plasma Startup in
Non-Solenoidal Plasma Startup in the A.C. Sontag for the Pegasus Research Team A.C. Sontag, 5th APS-DPP, Nov. 2, 28 1 Point-Source DC Helicity Injection Provides Viable Non-Solenoidal Startup Technique
DIII D Research in Support of ITER
Research in Support of ITER by E.J. Strait and the Team Presented at 22nd IAEA Fusion Energy Conference Geneva, Switzerland October 13-18, 28 DIII-D Research Has Made Significant Contributions in the Design
Current Drive Experiments in the HIT-II Spherical Tokamak
Current Drive Experiments in the HIT-II Spherical Tokamak T. R. Jarboe, P. Gu, V. A. Izzo, P. E. Jewell, K. J. McCollam, B. A. Nelson, R. Raman, A. J. Redd, P. E. Sieck, and R. J. Smith, Aerospace & Energetics
GA A27910 THE SINGLE-DOMINANT MODE PICTURE OF NON-AXISYMMETRIC FIELD SENSITIVIITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER GEOMETRIC TOLERANCES
GA A279 THE SINGLE-DOMINANT MODE PICTURE OF NON-AXISYMMETRIC FIELD SENSITIVIITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR ITER by C. PAZ-SOLDAN, K.H. BURRELL, R.J. BUTTERY, J.S. DEGRASSIE, N.M. FERRARO, A.M. GAROFALO,
Magnetohydrodynamic stability of negative central magnetic shear, high pressure ( pol 1) toroidal equilibria
Magnetohydrodynamic stability of negative central magnetic shear, high pressure ( pol 1) toroidal equilibria Robert G. Kleva Institute for Plasma Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Control of linear modes in cylindrical resistive MHD with a resistive wall, plasma rotation, and complex gain
Control of linear modes in cylindrical resistive MHD with a resistive wall, plasma rotation, and complex gain Dylan Brennan 1 and John Finn 2 contributions from Andrew Cole 3 1 Princeton University / PPPL
Transport Improvement Near Low Order Rational q Surfaces in DIII D
Transport Improvement Near Low Order Rational q Surfaces in DIII D M.E. Austin 1 With K.H. Burrell 2, R.E. Waltz 2, K.W. Gentle 1, E.J. Doyle 8, P. Gohil 2, C.M. Greenfield 2, R.J. Groebner 2, W.W. Heidbrink
A.J.Redd, D.J.Battaglia, M.W.Bongard, R.J.Fonck, and D.J.Schlossberg
A.J.Redd, D.J.Battaglia, M.W.Bongard, R.J.Fonck, and D.J.Schlossberg 51st APS-DPP Annual Meeting November 2-6, 2009 Atlanta, GA USA The PEGASUS Toroidal Experiment Helicity injection in PEGASUS Testing
DIII D INTEGRATED PLASMA CONTROL SOLUTIONS FOR ITER AND NEXT- GENERATION TOKAMAKS
GA A25808 DIII D INTEGRATED PLASMA CONTROL SOLUTIONS FOR ITER AND NEXT- GENERATION TOKAMAKS by D.A. HUMPHREYS, J.R. FERRON, A.W. HYATT, R.J. La HAYE, J.A. LEUER, B.G. PENAFLOR, M.L. WALKER, A.S. WELANDER,
Progress Toward High Performance Steady-State Operation in DIII D
Progress Toward High Performance Steady-State Operation in DIII D by C.M. Greenfield 1 for M. Murakami, 2 A.M. Garofalo, 3 J.R. Ferron, 1 T.C. Luce, 1 M.R. Wade, 1 E.J. Doyle, 4 T.A. Casper, 5 R.J. Jayakumar,
Overview of Recent Experimental Results From the DIII D Advanced Tokamak Program
OV/-5 Overview of Recent Experimental Results From the DIII D Advanced Tokamak Program K.H. Burrell for the DIII D Team General Atomics, P.O. Box 8568, San Diego, California 986-568 email: burrell@fusion.gat.com
Resistive Wall Mode Stabilization and Plasma Rotation Damping Considerations for Maintaining High Beta Plasma Discharges in NSTX
1 EXS/5-5 Resistive Wall Mode Stabilization and Plasma Rotation Damping Considerations for Maintaining High Beta Plasma Discharges in NSTX S.A. Sabbagh 1), J.W. Berkery 1), J.M. Bialek 1), R.E. Bell ),
Modeling of active control of external magnetohydrodynamic instabilities*
PHYSICS OF PLASMAS VOLUME 8, NUMBER 5 MAY 2001 Modeling of active control of external magnetohydrodynamic instabilities* James Bialek, Allen H. Boozer, M. E. Mauel, and G. A. Navratil Department of Applied
Experimental test of the neoclassical theory of poloidal rotation
Experimental test of the neoclassical theory of poloidal rotation Presented by Wayne Solomon with contributions from K.H. Burrell, R. Andre, L.R. Baylor, R. Budny, P. Gohil, R.J. Groebner, C.T. Holcomb,
Current Drive Experiments in the Helicity Injected Torus (HIT II)
Current Drive Experiments in the Helicity Injected Torus (HIT II) A. J. Redd, T. R. Jarboe, P. Gu, W. T. Hamp, V. A. Izzo, B. A. Nelson, R. G. O Neill, R. Raman, J. A. Rogers, P. E. Sieck and R. J. Smith
GA A26887 ADVANCES TOWARD QH-MODE VIABILITY FOR ELM-FREE OPERATION IN ITER
GA A26887 ADVANCES TOWARD QH-MODE VIABILITY FOR ELM-FREE OPERATION IN ITER by A.M. GAROFALO, K.H. BURRELL, M.J. LANCTOT, H. REIMERDES, W.M. SOLOMON and L. SCHMITZ OCTOBER 2010 DISCLAIMER This report was
GA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIII-D
GA A27857 IMPACT OF PLASMA RESPONSE ON RMP ELM SUPPRESSION IN DIII-D by A. WINGEN, N.M. FERRARO, M.W. SHAFER, E.A. UNTERBERG, T.E. EVANS, D.L. HILLIS, and P.B. SNYDER JULY 2014 DISCLAIMER This report was
Analytical Study of RWM Feedback Stabilisation with Application to ITER
CT/P- Analytical Study of RWM Feedback Stabilisation with Application to ITER Y Gribov ), VD Pustovitov ) ) ITER International Team, ITER Naka Joint Work Site, Japan ) Nuclear Fusion Institute, Russian
Heat Flux Management via Advanced Magnetic Divertor Configurations and Divertor Detachment.
Heat Flux Management via Advanced Magnetic Divertor Configurations and Divertor Detachment E. Kolemen a, S.L. Allen b, B.D. Bray c, M.E. Fenstermacher b, D.A. Humphreys c, A.W. Hyatt c, C.J. Lasnier b,
RWM Control in FIRE and ITER
RWM Control in FIRE and ITER Gerald A. Navratil with Jim Bialek, Allen Boozer & Oksana Katsuro-Hopkins MHD Mode Control Workshop University of Texas-Austin 3-5 November, 2003 OUTLINE REVIEW OF VALEN MODEL
Magnetic Control of Perturbed Plasma Equilibria
Magnetic Control of Perturbed Plasma Equilibria Nikolaus Rath February 17th, 2012 N. Rath (Columbia University) Magnetic Control of Perturbed Plasma Equilibria February 17th, 2012 1 / 19 The HBT-EP Tokamak
Performance limits. Ben Dudson. 24 th February Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
Performance limits Ben Dudson Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK 24 th February 2014 Ben Dudson Magnetic Confinement Fusion (1 of 24) Previously... In the last few
Disruption dynamics in NSTX. long-pulse discharges. Presented by J.E. Menard, PPPL. for the NSTX Research Team
Disruption dynamics in NSTX long-pulse discharges Presented by J.E. Menard, PPPL for the NSTX Research Team Workshop on Active Control of MHD Stability: Extension of Performance Monday, November 18, 2002
Characterization of neo-classical tearing modes in high-performance I- mode plasmas with ICRF mode conversion flow drive on Alcator C-Mod
1 EX/P4-22 Characterization of neo-classical tearing modes in high-performance I- mode plasmas with ICRF mode conversion flow drive on Alcator C-Mod Y. Lin, R.S. Granetz, A.E. Hubbard, M.L. Reinke, J.E.
Formation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas )
Formation and Long Term Evolution of an Externally Driven Magnetic Island in Rotating Plasmas ) Yasutomo ISHII and Andrei SMOLYAKOV 1) Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki 311-0102, Japan 1) University
SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL CORE TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS IN OH AND ECRH T-10 TOKAMAK PLASMAS
SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL CORE TURBULENCE CHARACTERISTICS IN OH AND ECRH T-1 TOKAMAK PLASMAS V. Vershkov, L.G. Eliseev, S.A. Grashin. A.V. Melnikov, D.A. Shelukhin, S.V. Soldatov, A.O. Urazbaev and T-1 team
GA A22863 PLASMA PRESSURE AND FLOWS DURING DIVERTOR DETACHMENT
GA A22863 PLASMA PRESSURE AND FLOWS DURING DIVERTOR DETACHMENT by M.J. SCHAFFER, J.A. BOEDO, N.H. BROOKS, R.C. ISLER, and R.A. MOYER AUGUST 1998 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work
GA A22443 STUDY OF H MODE THRESHOLD CONDITIONS IN DIII D
GA A443 STUDY OF H MODE THRESHOLD CONDITIONS IN DIII D by R.J. GROEBNER, T.N. CARLSTROM, K.H. BURRELL, S. CODA, E.J. DOYLE, P. GOHIL, K.W. KIM, Q. PENG, R. MAINGI, R.A. MOYER, C.L. RETTIG, T.L. RHODES,
Advances in Global MHD Mode Stabilization Research on NSTX
1 EX/5-1 Advances in Global MHD Mode Stabilization Research on NSTX S.A. Sabbagh 1), J.W. Berkery 1), R.E. Bell 2), J.M. Bialek 1), S.P. Gerhardt 2), J.E. Menard 2), R. Betti 3), D.A. Gates 2), B. Hu 3),
Effect of non-axisymmetric magnetic perturbations on divertor heat and particle flux profiles
1 EXD/P3-01 Effect of non-axisymmetric magnetic perturbations on divertor heat and particle flux profiles J-W. Ahn 1, J.M. Canik 1, R. Maingi 1, T.K. Gray 1, J.D. Lore 1, A.G. McLean 1, J.-K. Park 2, A.L.
A simple model of the resistive wall mode in tokamaks
A simple model of the resistive wall mode in tokamaks Richard Fitzpatrick Institute for Fusion Studies, Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin TX 78712 (February 18, 2003) A simple
Configuration Optimization of a Planar-Axis Stellarator with a Reduced Shafranov Shift )
Configuration Optimization of a Planar-Axis Stellarator with a Reduced Shafranov Shift ) Shoichi OKAMURA 1,2) 1) National Institute for Fusion Science, Toki 509-5292, Japan 2) Department of Fusion Science,
Global Mode Control and Stabilization for Disruption Avoidance in High-β NSTX Plasmas *
1 EX/P8-07 Global Mode Control and Stabilization for Disruption Avoidance in High-β NSTX Plasmas * J.W. Berkery 1, S.A. Sabbagh 1, A. Balbaky 1, R.E. Bell 2, R. Betti 3, J.M. Bialek 1, A. Diallo 2, D.A.
W.M. Solomon 1. Presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics Providence, RI October 29-November 2, 2012
Impact of Torque and Rotation in High Fusion Performance Plasmas by W.M. Solomon 1 K.H. Burrell 2, R.J. Buttery 2, J.S.deGrassie 2, E.J. Doyle 3, A.M. Garofalo 2, G.L. Jackson 2, T.C. Luce 2, C.C. Petty
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) r (minor radius) time. time. Soft X-ray. T_e contours (ECE) r (minor radius) time time
Studies of Spherical Tori, Stellarators and Anisotropic Pressure with M3D 1 L.E. Sugiyama 1), W. Park 2), H.R. Strauss 3), S.R. Hudson 2), D. Stutman 4), X-Z. Tang 2) 1) Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
GA A26116 THE CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF THE MAGNETIC TOPOLOGY AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS OF
GA A26116 THE CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF THE MAGNETIC TOPOLOGY AND NONLINEAR DYNAMICS OF ELMs by T.E. EVANS, J.H. YU, M. JAKUBOWSKI, O. SCHMITZ, J.G. WATKINS, and R.A. MOYER JUNE 2008 DISCLAIMER This report was
Design of next step tokamak: Consistent analysis of plasma flux consumption and poloidal field system
Design of next step tokamak: Consistent analysis of plasma flux consumption and poloidal field system J.M. Ané 1, V. Grandgirard, F. Albajar 1, J.Johner 1 1Euratom-CEA Association, Cadarache, France Euratom-EPFL
IMPACT OF EDGE CURRENT DENSITY AND PRESSURE GRADIENT ON THE STABILITY OF DIII-D HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCHARGES
IMPACT OF EDGE CURRENT DENSITY AND PRESSURE GRADIENT ON THE STABILITY OF DIII-D HIGH PERFORMANCE DISCHARGES by L.L. LAO, J.R. FERRON, E.J. STRAIT, V.S. CHAN, M.S. CHU, E.A. LAZARUS, TIC. LUCE, R.L. MILLER,
Oscillating-Field Current-Drive Experiment on MST
Oscillating-Field Current-Drive Experiment on MST K. J. McCollam, J. K. Anderson, D. J. Den Hartog, F. Ebrahimi, J. A. Reusch, J. S. Sarff, H. D. Stephens, D. R. Stone University of Wisconsin-Madison D.
Three Dimensional Effects in Tokamaks How Tokamaks Can Benefit From Stellarator Research
1 TH/P9-10 Three Dimensional Effects in Tokamaks How Tokamaks Can Benefit From Stellarator Research S. Günter, M. Garcia-Munoz, K. Lackner, Ph. Lauber, P. Merkel, M. Sempf, E. Strumberger, D. Tekle and
Simulation Study of Interaction between Energetic Ions and Alfvén Eigenmodes in LHD
1 Simulation Study of Interaction between Energetic Ions and Alfvén Eigenmodes in LHD Y. Todo 1), N. Nakajima 1), M. Osakabe 1), S. Yamamoto 2), D. A. Spong 3) 1) National Institute for Fusion Science,
AC loop voltages and MHD stability in RFP plasmas
AC loop voltages and MHD stability in RFP plasmas K. J. McCollam, D. J. Holly, V. V. Mirnov, J. S. Sar, D. R. Stone UW-Madison 54rd Annual Meeting of the APS-DPP October 29th - November 2nd, 2012 Providence,
Fast Ion Confinement in the MST Reversed Field Pinch
Fast Ion Connement in the MST Reversed Field Pinch Gennady Fiksel B. Hudson, D.J. Den Hartog, R.M. Magee, R. O'Connell, S.C. Prager MST Team - University of Wisconsin - Madison Center for Magnetic Self-Organization
- Effect of Stochastic Field and Resonant Magnetic Perturbation on Global MHD Fluctuation -
15TH WORKSHOP ON MHD STABILITY CONTROL: "US-Japan Workshop on 3D Magnetic Field Effects in MHD Control" U. Wisconsin, Madison, Nov 15-17, 17, 2010 LHD experiments relevant to Tokamak MHD control - Effect
GA A23430 ADVANCED TOKAMAK PHYSICS IN DIII D
GA A343 ADVANCED TOKAMAK PHYSICS IN DIII D by C.C. PETTY, T.C. LUCE, P.A. POLITZER, M.R. WADE, S.L. ALLEN, M.E. AUSTIN, B. BRAY, K.H. BURRELL, T.A. CASPER, M.S. CHU, J.R. FERRON, E.D. FREDRICKSON, A.M.
Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques
Plasma Response Control Using Advanced Feedback Techniques by M. Clement 1 with J. M. Hanson 1, J. Bialek 1 and G. A. Navratil 1 1 Columbia University Presented at 59 th Annual APS Meeting Division of
Low-field helicon discharges
Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 39 (1997) A411 A420. Printed in the UK PII: S0741-3335(97)80958-X Low-field helicon discharges F F Chen, X Jiang, J D Evans, G Tynan and D Arnush University of California,
Highlights from (3D) Modeling of Tokamak Disruptions
Highlights from (3D) Modeling of Tokamak Disruptions Presented by V.A. Izzo With major contributions from S.E. Kruger, H.R. Strauss, R. Paccagnella, MHD Control Workshop 2010 Madison, WI ..onset of rapidly
Particle Transport Measurements in the LHD Stochastic Magnetic Boundary Plasma using Mach Probes and Ion Sensitive Probe
Particle Transport Measurements in the LHD Stochastic Magnetic Boundary Plasma using Mach Probes and Ion Sensitive Probe N. Ezumi a*, K. Todoroki a, T. Kobayashi b, K. Sawada c, N. Ohno b, M. Kobayashi
GA A23114 DEPENDENCE OF HEAT AND PARTICLE TRANSPORT ON THE RATIO OF THE ION AND ELECTRON TEMPERATURES
GA A311 DEPENDENCE OF HEAT AND PARTICLE TRANSPORT ON THE RATIO OF THE ION AND ELECTRON TEMPERATURES by C.C. PETTY, M.R. WADE, J.E. KINSEY, R.J. GROEBNER, T.C. LUCE, and G.M. STAEBLER AUGUST 1999 This report
Current-driven instabilities
Current-driven instabilities Ben Dudson Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK 21 st February 2014 Ben Dudson Magnetic Confinement Fusion (1 of 23) Previously In the last
On the physics of shear flows in 3D geometry
On the physics of shear flows in 3D geometry C. Hidalgo and M.A. Pedrosa Laboratorio Nacional de Fusión, EURATOM-CIEMAT, Madrid, Spain Recent experiments have shown the importance of multi-scale (long-range)
QTYUIOP ENERGY TRANSPORT IN NEUTRAL BEAM HEATED DIII D DISCHARGES WITH NEGATIVE MAGNETIC SHEAR D.P. SCHISSEL. Presented by. for the DIII D Team*
ENERGY TRANSPORT IN NEUTRAL BEAM HEATED DIII D DISCHARGES WITH NEGATIVE MAGNETIC SHEAR Presented by D.P. SCHISSEL for the DIII D Team* Presented to 38th APS/DPP Meeting NOVEMBER 11 15, 1996 Denver, Colorado
Control of resistive wall modes in a cylindrical tokamak with plasma rotation and complex gain
Control of resistive wall modes in a cylindrical tokamak with plasma rotation and complex gain arxiv:146.5245v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 2 Jun 214 D. P. Brennan and J. M. Finn June 23, 214 Department of Astrophysical