WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference 2017
|
|
- Lawrence Mosley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Application of Rheological Data for Non-Newtonian Sludges; Use of the Differential Viscosity for Mixing Simulations and System Friction Calculations Marilyn Pine 1, Kent Keeran 1, Glenn Dorsch 1 1 Vaughan Company, Inc., Montesano, WA ABSTRACT Proper sizing of mixing and pumping systems requires a good understanding of the viscosity of the unique sludge or slurry under consideration. A Newtonian fluid is one in which the viscosity does not change with shear rate; its viscosity can be described with one value. However, because of the solid components present, many biological slurries (TWAS, digested sludges, primary sludges, etc.) are non-newtonian in nature. By definition, a non-newtonian fluid is one whose viscosity is not constant and which varies with shear rate. Its viscosity can no longer be described with one value and must be described as a set of values, or as an equation which calculates viscosity as a function of shear rate. This relationship between viscosity and shear rate can be used as an input into a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation to predict fluid velocities and mixing effectiveness or it can be used to approximate frictional losses in piping systems. Viscosity as a function of shear rate can be derived from a fluids flow curve. The flow curve is a set of data points which plot measurements of shear stress versus shear rate. This data can be obtained from a rotational viscometer or ideally, a rheometer. The most commonly used convention for describing the viscosity of a non-newtonian fluid is with an expression for apparent viscosity ; it can be calculated by taking a shear stress value at any point on the fluid s flow curve and dividing by the corresponding shear rate at that point. This is essentially the slope of a line from any given data point back to the origin. This method is typically used since it can be calculated from a single data point and can be measured in the field at a given shear rate. Experience with simulations and actual observed results over the last years, however, has shown that using apparent viscosity values or equations in CFD simulations of mixing tank applications can lead to non-realistic and overly conservative results which might predict the need for higher mixing power than necessary. This is especially true for fluids with higher yield stresses and higher viscosities (typically sludges with higher percent solids and/or with polymer thickening). This paper discusses an alternate method to calculate viscosity by defining an equation for the actual slope, or first derivative, of the fluid s flow curve to describe the fluid s differential viscosity at varying shear rates. Better correlation has been found between simulated results and actual observed system performance when using this method for predicting mixing system velocities. This method requires a complete set of flow curve data in order to determine the true slope, and thus viscosity, at any given shear rate. Figure A1 demonstrates flow curve data (shear stress versus shear rate measurements) for a non- Newtonian slurry. The apparent viscosity at Point A is calculated as the slope of line A1 which extends from Point A back to the origin. The differential viscosity at point A is calculated as the slope of line A2 which is tangent to the flow curve at point A. Note that both the apparent and differential viscosity values vary at different shear rates. 496
2 Figure A1: Comparison of Apparent Viscosity versus Differential Viscosity at Point A Understanding the rheology of each unique application is important to predict how pumping and mixing systems will work in the field and to avoid overestimating the amount of energy usage and power required. Lessons learned over the last decade have helped to refine techniques for interpreting and applying flow curve data for sizing mixing and pumping systems. Figure A2 below illustrates CFD results from a study where the actual viscosity of the thickened sludge being introduced into a mixing system was measured. The application of field data and differential viscosity provided the best representation of actual observed mixing velocities and system performance. Figure A2: Comparison of Simulation Results for Customer Mixing System This paper will discuss: The importance of accurate flow curve data over a wide range of shear rates. How apparent and differential viscosity can be calculated and an example of how the interpretation of the flow curve data can impact results, in some cases dramatically. Examples of real-life applications and physical validation. How the differential viscosity can also be applied to frictional losses in piping. KEYWORDS Non-Newtonian, differential viscosity, apparent viscosity, mixing, CFD 497
3 1.0 Introduction Knowing the unique rheological properties of a given sludge or slurry is important to understand when sizing pumping and mixing applications. Sludge viscosity will directly impact CFD simulations for mixing systems and system head loss calculations for pumping. Because the fluids encountered in these mixing systems tend to be non-newtonian with shear thinning behavior, regions in the tank that are moving slowly have the highest local viscosity and therefore are the hardest areas in which to generate mixing. On the other hand, once the thick fluid starts to move and the local shear rate increases, the corresponding fluid viscosity in that region drops and it is subsequently easier to mix. Because the rheological characteristics of sludges can vary dramatically depending on percent solids, chemistry, temperature, processing, polymer addition, etc., the fluids that required to be mixed can sometimes be so viscous that they are very difficult to mix or pump. Depending upon each fluid s unique flow curve, mixing thick blended sludges can be a challenge, and one must be very careful not to undersize the mixing systems. However, oversizing can lead to increased power requirements and improper pump selection. This paper summarizes lessons learned over the last years in applying rheological data to mixing systems and their simulation to achieve representative results. 2.0 Rheology Background 2.1 Flow Curves; Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Fluids Viscosity is a measurement of a fluid s resistance to flow or movement. It is derived from a fluid s flow curve (or rheogram), which is a plot of shear stress () measurements at different shear rates () (see Figure 1). Viscosity is essentially the slope of the curve. A constant slope throughout the entire flow curve indicates a constant viscosity at all shear rates. Fluids with this behavior are classified as Newtonian fluids; examples include water, light motor oils, and sludges with very low percent total solids (TS). In CFD simulations, a Newtonian fluid s dynamic viscosity can be described by one constant value for all shear rates within the fluid domain. However, due to the presence of a higher percent solids component, many biological slurries behave as non-newtonian fluids. The shape of their flow curve is no longer a straight line; the slope of the curve changes with shear rate. In this case, viscosity is not constant and is a function of how fast the fluid is moving (shear rate). For a mixing simulation of non-newtonian fluids, the dynamic viscosity can no longer be defined by one value and it is necessary to create an expression which describes the local dynamic viscosity as a function of the local shear rate, or how fast the fluid is moving in each area of a mixing tank. In Figure 1 below, the slope of the upper non-newtonian flow curve rapidly increases at the left hand side of the plot, at low shear rates. This higher slope correlates with higher viscosities at low shear rates, as shown in Figure 2, and directly impacts the amount of energy required for mixing. Typically as the shear rate increases, the slope of the non-newtonian flow curve begins to decrease, resulting in a similar decrease in viscosity. The rate at which this viscosity decreases with shear rate will impact the ability to pump the fluid and to accommodate the associated head loss and resistance to flow in the piping system. 498
4 Mixing Tanks Pipe Flow Shear Stress Non-Newtonian fluid (variable slope) Newtonian fluid (constant slope) 1 10 Shear Rate 100 Figure 1: Schematic of Fluid s Flow Curve (Hilts et al., 2014) (Shear Stress vs. Shear Rate ) Figure 2: Viscosity vs. Shear Rate (Hilts et al., 2014) 2.2 Comparison of Typical Rheological Models Non-Newtonian fluids are often characterized depending on how well their flow curve data appears to fit a given equation or rheological model. Some of the more common models are shown in Figure
5 Shear Stress = K n (Power Law) = A + B n (Sisko) = y + K n (Herschel-Bulkley) = y + K (Bingham Plastic) y = K (Newtonian) Shear Rate Figure 3: Common Non-Newtonian Rheological Models Depending upon the particular type of slurry or sludge, one form of equation may best fit the data for one sludge or for a given range of shear rates, but not another. Three commonly used rheological models are the Bingham Plastic, Power Law, and Herschel-Bulkley. They have the following forms: Bingham Plastic K [1] y Power Law n Herschel-Bulkley n K [2] y K [3] where: = shear stress (Pa) y = yield stress (Pa) = shear rate (s -1 ) K and n are fitting coefficients (with appropriate units) It is important to note that these models are simplifications to characterize a given fluid; it can be difficult to fit a set of measurements neatly to any one model. Additionally, one form of equation may fit one portion, or shear rate range, of data and another may best describe another range of the data. 2.3 Apparent Viscosity As discussed above, because viscosity varies for different shear rates for non-newtonian fluids, the viscosity varies with the slope of the flow curve for different shear rates. The conventional way to describe the viscous behavior is by measuring the shear stress at a given shear rate and reporting what is defined as the apparent viscosity. This is merely the measured shear stress divided by the corresponding shear rate (A) at which it was measured. A A apparent [4] A = dynamic viscosity (Pa s) = shear stress (Pa) at a given shear rate A = shear rate (s -1 ) at a given shear rate A Or, given an equation ) to describe shear stress as a function over a range of shear rates: 500
6 apparent evaluated at varying values of shear rate. [5] 2.4 Differential Viscosity Another method to define viscosity is the differential viscosity which is defined as the derivative of shear stress with respect to shear rate. It is found by calculating the slope of the tangent to the flow curve at a given shear rate (the first derivative of the flow curve). d diff [6] d 2.5 Graphic Comparison/Visualization of Apparent and Differential Viscosity The following figure and discussion from Rheology Modifiers Handbook: Practical Use and Applications provides an excellent description and schematic of the apparent viscosity and the differential viscosity discussed above. Figure 4: Definition of Apparent and Differential Viscosity (Braun & Mosen, 1999) The differential viscosity is equal to the slope of the shear stress versus shear rate curve at some point A (or the tangent of the angle ). The apparent viscosity is equal to the slope of a line that connects the origin with a given point A on the shear stress versus shear rate curve (or the tangent of the angle ). Of the two methods for expressing the coefficient of viscosity, the apparent viscosity is usually chosen. This is because an apparent viscosity is easily measured at one fixed shear rate while a differential viscosity requires measurements at several shear rates followed by measurement of the slope at the shear rate of interest. (Braun & Mosen, 1999) 3.0 Validation of Mixing Simulation Results with Physical Observations 3.1 Early Experiences with non-newtonian CFD Mixing Simulations One of the first experiences with a thickened blended sludge simulation arose with a mixing system in New Zealand. The use of the apparent viscosity function (derived from non-newtonian flow curve equations provided by the owner) resulted in simulations depicting very poor mixing velocities. As a result, the proposed pump size, mixing flow, and horsepower were increased to ensure that desired mixing velocities and flow patterns would match typical supplied mixing systems. However, subsequent startup results and testing indicated that these tanks actually were mixing at much higher velocities than originally simulated. A re-simulation, at a later time, with the differential viscosity method demonstrated a much more realistic assessment of the mixing system. In hindsight, it is generally agreed that these systems were most likely oversized based on the results obtained with the apparent viscosity method. More recent systems installed at the same location were designed with less power and flow. 501
7 3.2 Simulation of TWAS Blend Tank and Proposed Modifications The use of a differential viscosity equation for another owner helped to provide a much more realistic assessment of their system and a realistic understanding of how proposed modifications would improve the mixing. Their installed 7 m (23 ft.) diameter x 6.1 m (20 ft.) high cylindrical blend tank mixing system was not providing visible mixing at full tank level when sludge viscosity was at its highest. Once alerted to the problem, CFD modeling was used to investigate the system and to make recommendations for improvement. This was a good opportunity to evaluate the mixing system with blended sludge rheology measurements obtained from their facility. The particular fluid that was desired to be simulated was polymer thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS); this type of sludge commonly exhibits a very high yield behavior at the left side of the flow curve. These blend tank mixing systems can be very challenging and may require extra mixing energy to overcome high viscosity at low shear rates Field Measurements of TWAS The on-site consulting engineer was able to take some shear stress measurements with a rotational viscometer at varying shear rates. The results of two combined days of samples are shown in Figure 7, plotting shear stress (Pa) versus shear rate (s -1 ). Although it would have been desired to have more flow curve data at higher shear rates, the data allowed the generation of an equation to describe the flow curve at lower shear rates. This equation was then used to input a differential viscosity formula into various CFD simulation trials to evaluate ways to improve the mixing system. These measurements from an actual process sample also helped with comparison of the rheology of this TWAS sample with other sludge data and to understand the magnitude of the resistance to flow at low shear rates. Figure 7: Field Measured Rheology Data Sept 2006 Rotational Viscometer Flow Curve Data, 6-7% TWAS Sample (Bishop et al., 2007) In this example, the flow curve was chosen to be represented by the power law equation [2]: 0.1 ( ) POWER 29.1 and its corresponding first derivative has the form shown in [6]: d n ( ) diff nk 2.91 (Differential Viscosity, Pa s) d The conventional method of deriving apparent viscosity [5] yields 0. 9 ( ) app 29.1 (Apparent Viscosity, Pa s) 502
8 Depending upon the method used to derive an expression for viscosity, different equations were input into the CFD analysis for comparison CFD Analysis Results of Initial Mixing System Initial simulations provided a baseline for comparison with the actual observed mixing system. Prior to any modifications, the tank was not able to be mixed when full of TWAS; reported surface mixing could only be seen to levels of about 2.1 m (7 ft.). Figures 8a and 8b are contour plots of fluid velocity through a vertical cross-section of an initial mixing tank configuration with a simulated fluid depth of 6.1 m (20 ft.). Even though this was a challenging thickened sludge to mix and both simulation results demonstrated poor mixing, the differential viscosity results were more representative of actual observations. Simulation results were useful in helping the owner to understand that even though they may not have seen surface movement as the tank levels increased, the fluid was still being mixed in the lower regions of the tank. Figure 8a: Differential Viscosity Figure 8b: Apparent Viscosity Figure 8: Fluid Streamlines and Velocity Contour Plots through Cross-Sectional Planes. Baseline Trials on Initial Mixing System: 193 m 3 /hr, 11kW (850 GPM, 15HP). Simulated Fluid Depth = 6.1 m (20 ft.) CFD Analysis Results after Final Changes Made to Modify System Various changes were proposed to improve mixing using the same pump and pump horsepower. Different alternatives included evaluating different numbers of nozzles, nozzle diameters, nozzle aiming, etc. Figures 9a and 9b show simulated results with the same 6.1 m fluid depth for the final modified system. Some of the proposed changes included doubling the number of nozzles in the mixing system while adjusting the nozzle exit diameter to keep the pump operating in an acceptable portion of the pump curve, as well as re-aiming nozzle angles and adding an elbow to help direct more of the flow towards the upper regions in the tank. The simulated flow and horsepower correspond to the current modified system in operation. Again, based on actual observations of the mixing system at various operating levels, the results with the differential viscosity more closely matched with actual system performance and mixing after the modifications were put into place. Surface mixing was reported at a depth of 3.7 m (12 ft.); the apparent viscosity results were not an accurate portrayal of the system in operation. 503
9 Figure 9a: Differential Viscosity Figure 9b: Apparent Viscosity Figure 9: Fluid Streamlines and Velocity Contour Plots through Cross-Sectional Planes. Final Modified Mixing System: 239 m 3 /hr, 11 kw (1050 GPM, 15HP) CFD Analysis Results of Estimated System to Provide Full Mixing A question also arose as to how much horsepower and flow might have been required to completely mix these tanks completely full with 100% TWAS. Figures 10a &10b below show the results of simulations with increased mixing flow and power. As expected, the result with the differential viscosity shows higher mixing velocities at all levels in the tank as the flow and power are increased. Results using the apparent viscosity show that the contents of the tank are still virtually at a standstill, except for small high velocity areas directly next to the nozzle outlets. If the apparent viscosity results were relied upon, the amount of power required to fully mix these tanks would have been significantly overestimated. While the owner did not upgrade the system as shown in Figure 10, these simulations were useful in understanding how much mixing energy and power might be required for future tanks with thickened sludges having a similar rheology. Figure 10a: Differential Viscosity Figure 10b: Apparent Viscosity Figure 10: Fluid Streamlines and Velocity Contour Plots through Cross-Sectional Planes Alternate Proposed Mixing System: 427 m 3 /hr, 30 kw (1880 GPM, 40HP). 504
10 3.3 Example Mixing Simulation Results for an Anaerobic Digester From about 2006 forward, the goal has been to get the best understanding of each unique sludge to be mixed, to obtain any actual shear stress versus shear rate measurements, and to develop an expression for differential viscosity for input into mixing simulations. Continued feedback on mixing test results, videos, and field observations have helped to confirm that simulated results based on the differential viscosity method better correlate with actual performance. In a typical anaerobic digester, the range of TS and viscosity of digested sludges is typically less than those seen with thickened WAS sludges as discussed in Examples 3.1 and 3.2. Figure 11 plots a couple of representative power law flow curve equations which were chosen to qualitatively illustrate the difference in mixing simulation results for a digester application Shear Stress vs. Shear Rate Sample 4% Digested Sludge Flow Curve Sample 2-3% Digested Sludge Flow Curve Shear Stress (Pa) = = Shear Rate (sec -1 ) Figure 11: Sample Digested Sludge Power Law Flow Curves (2-3% and 4% DS) The difference in simulation results when comparing the differential and apparent viscosity methods is not as pronounced for lighter sludges and fluids with lower TS as shown below for the chosen 2-3% digested sludge in Figure 11. (Power law equation where = ). The tank diameter chosen for this particular simulation was 33.5 m (110 ft.). Figure 12: Velocity Contour Plots and Streamlines for Anaerobic Digester Mixing System, Estimated 2-3% Digested Sludge. (Images courtesy of the City of Calgary) Left (12a): Differential Viscosity, Volume Average Velocity = 0.20 m/s Right (12b): Apparent Viscosity, Volume Average Velocity = 0.15 m/s 505
11 However, because average shear rates in these mixing simulations are typically very low, on the order of 1 s -1 or less, a change in yield stress has a marked difference on viscosity at low shear rates and the difference between the two viscosity methods becomes more pronounced. Figure 13 illustrates how overall mixing velocities within the tank have slowed when a sludge with the sample equation for 4% digested sludge ( = ) is considered, as well as how the difference in results between the two viscosity methods is now more significant. Figure 13: Velocity Contour Plots and Streamlines for Anaerobic Digester Mixing System, Estimated 4% Digested Sludge. (Images courtesy of the City of Calgary) Left (13a): Differential Viscosity, Volume Average Velocity = 0.17 m/s Right (13b): Apparent Viscosity, Volume Average Velocity = 0.03 m/s Again, the different results shown in Figures 13a and 13b were derived from the same power law flow curve equation for 4% digested sludge. The results only differ depending upon which method was used to derive an expression for viscosity as a function of shear rate from the original power law flow curve. Based on experience with numerous digester mixing systems, the results simulated with an apparent viscosity derived from the 4% DS flow curve equation is not an accurate portrayal of how these systems actually perform or mix. 4.0 Obtaining Good Rheology Data for Calculation of Differential Viscosity 4.1 Non-Newtonian fluids cannot be described by one viscosity value Most wastewater sludges with TS values equal to or greater than 2-3% typically behave as non- Newtonian fluids; their viscosity cannot be described by one value. Because their viscosity varies with shear rate, the calculation of viscosity first requires a set of shear stress versus shear rate measurements. These values must be obtained from an instrument that is able to measure shear stress for a corresponding shear rate; equipment that assumes the fluid is Newtonian and only provides one viscosity value with no reference shear rate may not adequately describe the fluid s rheology. Shear stress versus shear rate measurements may be obtained from a rotational viscometer (example data shown earlier in Figure 7) or more ideally, a rheometer which can obtain more detailed shear stress data over a wide range of shear rates. Figure 14 below demonstrates rheometer data which is a good representation of an ideal set of measurements for a TWAS sample. From these data points, one can roughly estimate the magnitude of resistance at low shear rates, evaluate the rate of curvature at higher rates, as well have enough data points to aid in deriving a flow curve expression. 506
12 45 Example of Stepped Flow Data Site J: 4.6% TWAS (GBT) Shear Stress (Pa) Stepped Flow Data - Step Shear Rate (s -1 ) Figure 14: Sample Flow Curve Data obtained from Rotational Rheometer (Hilts et al.,2014) 4.2 Assume that each sludge is unique, because it probably is In general, the yield stress and viscosity of biological slurries tend to increase with higher percent solids. All sludges are unique and their differences can become increasingly more pronounced with the type of slurry, percent solids, processing, etc. Polymer thickened sludges may tend to have the most unpredictable and variable rheologies, in terms of both yield stress behavior and resistance to flow at higher shear rates. This is especially true as the percent solids increases for > 5% thickened blended sludges (Hilts et al., 2014). Whenever possible, it is best to generate a flow curve from a representative sample of the sludge under study or consideration. Because the viscosity will vary with temperature, one should also try to test at a representative process temperature as well. Flow curves contain a wealth of information. Shear stress measurements at very low shear rates (for example, 1 s -1 or less) are very useful for evaluating a sludge s behavior when mixing; measurements at higher shear rates (up to 100 s -1 ) will help one to understand how the same sludge might react in a piping system at higher velocities. Additionally, each flow curve will tend to have a different rate of increase at higher shear rates. If a power law equation has been used to describe the data, higher exponent values will result in flow curves corresponding to fluids which do not decrease in viscosity as much at higher shear rates. This will be indicative of a fluid which may be harder to pump with associated higher friction losses. 4.3 Derive representative equation to use over shear rate range under consideration In some cases, especially as the percent solids increases or with polymer thickening, one may not be able to come up with one-size-fits-all equation that fits the whole range of data. It may be preferable to have a couple of different flow curve equations depending upon the region of shear rates that one is interested in. For example, a Bingham Plastic (BP) straight line equation is often a very good fit for data at higher shear rates, however it typically will not correctly define the viscous behavior at low shear rates; a power law or other equation might be a better choice. Figure 15 demonstrates how a BP equation fit to the sample data shown previously in Figure 14 may be a good approximation at higher shear rates but not for the lower shear rates associated with mixing. Depending upon the magnitude of a sludge s yield stress and slope of the equation, the BP equation combined with the apparent viscosity method may be overly conservative for mixing simulations. Also, one should try to keep all raw data for future reference; do not try to oversimplify the data. Once an equation has been fit to data and the original underlying data is gone, it is impossible to know how well the final flow curve equation described the original data. 507
13 Shear Stress (Pa) Example of Flow Curve Data Site J: 4.6% TWAS (GBT) = Stepped Flow Test Data Points 5 Example Bingham Plastic eqn to fit data Shear Rate (s -1 ) Shear Stress (Pa) = Example of Flow Curve Data Site J: 4.6% TWAS (GBT) 10 Stepped Flow Test Data Points 5 Example Power Law eqn to fit data Shear Rate (s -1 ) Figure 15: Flow curve data from Figure 14; Data fit with BP and Power Law equations. 4.4 Differential Viscosity is First Derivative of Flow Curve While a value for apparent viscosity can be reported with one shear stress measurement at a particular shear rate, the calculation of differential viscosity requires a series of measurements such that the rate of change in the relevant shear rate range can be determined. The use of a yield stress term (such as in the Bingham Plastic [1] or Herschel-Bulkley [3] equations) may make it difficult to calculate the initial slope of the data and to accurately model the fluid s resistance to movement at very low shear rates. Ideally, the original flow curve data points can be used instead to derive an equation which passes through zero and does not contain a yield stress term, such as with a Power Law equation. Sometimes it can be challenging to find an expression which fits the data and also which can be differentiated. As an example, one form of flow curve equation which may be used and which often helps to fit non-newtonian sludge data for a wide range of shear rates is in the form of the Sisko equation as shown on Figure 3: n ( ) A B where n1 d ( ) diff An B [7, 8] d 5.0 Application of Flow Curve Measurements and Differential Viscosity to System Friction Loss Calculations System calculations, even for a system assumed flowing with water or a very light sludge can be very challenging. Depending on the piping material, age of piping, fittings and their placement in proximity to each other, different reported loss coefficients, etc., there are a number of sources of variation which affect friction loss calculations in a piping system. For sludges with higher TS, it is generally assumed that viscosity will start to play a larger role in head loss due to friction. If a strict multiplier (based solely upon percent solids) is applied for head loss calculations, its use may lead to overly conservative estimates because it does not consider the decrease in viscosity at higher pipe velocities with a non-newtonian fluid. Also, just as with mixing simulations, as one starts to consider sludges with higher TS and/or the effect of polymers for thickening, the point when the viscosity will start to have a significant impact on friction loss calculations may also be when the actual sludge rheology is unpredictable and historical measurements from other sludges are less reliable. One way in which the differential viscosity approach has been used is by applying a given sludge s flow curve equation, when available, to estimate head loss due to 508
14 the friction via the steps below. Using the differential viscosity rather than apparent viscosity may give a slightly lower estimate for head loss. 1. Calculate average velocity V in each piping segment or component based on pipe diameter D and pumping flow rate Q 2. Estimate shear rate (s -1 ) in each segment of piping Although the velocity profile across the interior cross-section of a pipe varies with distance from the wall, a simplified method of estimating the shear rate at the wall for a pipe of a given diameter is based on average pipe velocity: 8 V Shear Rate N [9] D Note that [9] calculates average pipe shear rate N based on an assumed velocity distribution for laminar flow and a Newtonian fluid. The actual wall shear rate for pipe flow is higher for non-newtonian fluids but also very difficult to measure and quantify. The Rabinowitsch-Mooney equation adds a correction factor for non-newtonian fluids with assumed laminar flow (Nguyen et al., 2012). For a power law fluid: 8 V 3n 1 Shear Rate RM D 4n [10] where n = the exponent in the power law equation = K n. Corrected shear rates will be higher than for those using [9] and will increase as the exponent in the power law equation becomes smaller, indicative of more shear-thinning behavior and reduced viscosities at higher flows. Estimating shear rate with [9] should result in a lower estimate for shear rate and a higher limit for predicted head loss. 3. Calculate dynamic viscosity at the shear rate using differential viscosity function 4. Convert dynamic viscosity to kinematic viscosity 5. Calculate dimensionless Reynolds number Re from kinematic viscosity, pipe velocity, and diameter VD Re [11] 6. Calculate head loss in pipe segment due to friction losses The Darcy-Weisbach equation is commonly used to calculate head loss h f due to friction in piping with a length, or equivalent length, L based upon piping diameter D, velocity V, and acceleration constant g (Cameron, 2002). 2 L V h f [12] f DARCY D 2g Equation [12] is used in conjunction with a friction factor f which varies with the type of flow (laminar or turbulent) and the relative roughness of the pipe. For assumed laminar flow (about Re <2000), the roughness of the pipe s interior surface should not affect the friction factor; the friction factor f is estimated directly from the value of Reynolds number. Laminar flow: f 64 / Re [13] DARCY 509
15 Head loss resulting from friction and fluid viscosity can be applied to sections of straight lengths of piping, fittings, and valves which have an equivalent length of piping. Reducers, enlargers, inlets, nozzles exits, and pipe exits which contribute to overall system head loss due to changes in velocity head are generally treated separately and not adjusted based on friction factor. 7. Sum the total losses for all segments of piping and plot for a range of different system flow rates to generate system curves. 8. Compare system curves for both assumed laminar and turbulent flows for chosen pump and application. For higher values of Reynolds number, the value of the friction factor calculated with the assumption of laminar flow gets smaller, and the friction factor for turbulent flow and the increasing effects of pipe roughness start to dominate. If the water/turbulent flow head losses begin to dominate at higher values of flow, those values are used. Where the two methods intersect the pump performance curve can serve as estimated upper and lower limits to bracket the potential head loss and flow of the final system ranging from the sludge curve estimate to the water curve estimate. This range can be compared with system requirements and capability of chosen pump. For non-newtonian sludges with assumed laminar flow, the shape of the predicted system curve will roughly correlate with the shape of its flow curve; it will depend upon the magnitude of yield stress behavior and the exponent controlling how the viscosity decreases at higher rates. Often an initial jump in predicted head loss will be apparent at very low GPM; this jump roughly corresponds to the initial yield stress of the non-newtonian fluid providing more resistance at low flow and shear rates. As viscosity drops due to non-newtonian behavior at higher shear rates, the head loss due to friction begins to drop as well. Eventually the flow transitions to turbulent flow and the system curve merges with the water curve at higher pumping flows. Many digested sludges tend to have system curves closer to the water estimate, even for higher 4-5% solids, due to the reduced viscosity at higher flows; this has been confirmed with actual pump pressure readings. Conversely, the combination of high yield stress behavior along with a high power law exponent n, as often seen with polymer thickened WAS sludges, can result in a fluid that is very difficult to get moving and whose friction losses do not decrease at higher shear rates, leading to very high friction losses in a piping system. 6.0 Conclusions and Summary This paper summarizes lessons learned over the last years; these lessons have been applied to sizing and analysis of mixing systems, pump sizing, and hydraulic calculations in viscous slurries. Mixing these fluids can be very challenging, (for example, thickened sludge blend tanks), so it is critical to properly evaluate their expected performance. The use of an inaccurate flow curve equation or viscosity model can potentially lead to oversizing or undersizing of mixing systems and decreased confidence about the expected capability of a mixing system. Both the choice of the flow curve equation as well as the method for calculating viscosity can have a significant impact on predicted results. The choice of viscosity equation may not be as significant for some applications which have fluids that are more Newtonian in behavior or are simulated at higher shear rates. However, the derivative-based differential viscosity method may give markedly different results when considering fluids or sludges with a high yield point behavior in applications that deal with low shear rates, such as mixing systems. Based on simulation results, actual field observations, and pump pressure measurements, applying the 510
16 differential viscosity appears to provide much better correlation between simulated results and actual system performance. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank the various contacts and owners throughout the years who have helped to collect sludge viscosity measurements and to provide feedback on installed mixing systems and pump performance. REFERENCES Bishop, R.; McCormick, J.; Peterson, J.; Dorsch, G.; Pine, M. (2007) Blending Raw Sludges with Pump Mix Systems, presented at 2007 PNCWA Annual Conference in Vancouver, WA. Braun, D.; Rosen, M. (1999) Rheology Modifiers Handbook: Practical Use and Applications, William Andrew Publishing, 1 st edition, Figure 1.2. Cameron Hydraulic Data: A handy reference on the subject of hydraulics and steam (2002), edited by C. C. Heald, 19 th edition, published by Flowserve Corporation. Hilts, B.; Pine, M.; Dorsch, G. (2014) Characterizing Polymer Thickened Biosolids for Pumping Applications, presented and published at WEF Residuals and Biosolids Conference 2014 in Austin, TX. Nguyen, Q. and Nguyen, N.; (2012) Incompressible Non-Newtonian Fluid Flows, Continuum Mechanics - Progress in Fundamentals and Engineering Applications, Dr. Yong Gan (Ed.), ISBN: , InTech 511
Modelling of dispersed, multicomponent, multiphase flows in resource industries Section 4: Non-Newtonian fluids and rheometry (PART 1)
Modelling of dispersed, multicomponent, multiphase flows in resource industries Section 4: Non-Newtonian fluids and rheometry (PART 1) Globex Julmester 2017 Lecture #3 05 July 2017 Agenda Lecture #3 Section
More informationFE Exam Fluids Review October 23, Important Concepts
FE Exam Fluids Review October 3, 013 mportant Concepts Density, specific volume, specific weight, specific gravity (Water 1000 kg/m^3, Air 1. kg/m^3) Meaning & Symbols? Stress, Pressure, Viscosity; Meaning
More informationRespect the Rheology!
Respect the Rheology! Thickened Biosolids Pumping for Beneficial Reuse in Columbus, Ohio December 7, 2017 Rick Kent Donnie Stallman Southerly WWTP Plant Manager, City of Columbus Senior Engineer, Brown
More informationNon Newtonian Fluid Dynamics
PDHonline Course M417 (3 PDH) Non Newtonian Fluid Dynamics Instructor: Paul G. Conley, PE 2012 PDH Online PDH Center 5272 Meadow Estates Drive Fairfax, VA 22030-6658 Phone & Fax: 703-988-0088 www.pdhonline.org
More informationFE Fluids Review March 23, 2012 Steve Burian (Civil & Environmental Engineering)
Topic: Fluid Properties 1. If 6 m 3 of oil weighs 47 kn, calculate its specific weight, density, and specific gravity. 2. 10.0 L of an incompressible liquid exert a force of 20 N at the earth s surface.
More informationSignature: (Note that unsigned exams will be given a score of zero.)
Neatly print your name: Signature: (Note that unsigned exams will be given a score of zero.) Circle your lecture section (-1 point if not circled, or circled incorrectly): Prof. Dabiri Prof. Wassgren Prof.
More informationFluid Mechanics Prof. T.I. Eldho Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 17 Laminar and Turbulent flows
Fluid Mechanics Prof. T.I. Eldho Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 17 Laminar and Turbulent flows Welcome back to the video course on fluid mechanics. In
More informationApplied Fluid Mechanics
Applied Fluid Mechanics 1. The Nature of Fluid and the Study of Fluid Mechanics 2. Viscosity of Fluid 3. Pressure Measurement 4. Forces Due to Static Fluid 5. Buoyancy and Stability 6. Flow of Fluid and
More informationMajor and Minor Losses
Abstract Major and Minor Losses Caitlyn Collazo, Team 2 (1:00 pm) A Technovate fluid circuit system was used to determine the pressure drop across a pipe section and across an orifice. These pressure drops
More informationChapter 6. Losses due to Fluid Friction
Chapter 6 Losses due to Fluid Friction 1 Objectives To measure the pressure drop in the straight section of smooth, rough, and packed pipes as a function of flow rate. To correlate this in terms of the
More informationChapter 3 Non-Newtonian fluid
Chapter 3 Non-Newtonian fluid 3-1. Introduction: The study of the deformation of flowing fluids is called rheology; the rheological behavior of various fluids is sketchen Figure 3-1. Newtonian fluids,
More informationLECTURE 6- ENERGY LOSSES IN HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS SELF EVALUATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
LECTURE 6- ENERGY LOSSES IN HYDRAULIC SYSTEMS SELF EVALUATION QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS 1. What is the head loss ( in units of bars) across a 30mm wide open gate valve when oil ( SG=0.9) flow through at a
More informationCalculation of Pipe Friction Loss
Doc.No. 6122-F3T071 rev.2 Calculation of Pipe Friction Loss Engineering Management Group Development Planning Department Standard Pump Business Division EBARA corporation October 16th, 2013 1 / 33 2 /
More information150A Review Session 2/13/2014 Fluid Statics. Pressure acts in all directions, normal to the surrounding surfaces
Fluid Statics Pressure acts in all directions, normal to the surrounding surfaces or Whenever a pressure difference is the driving force, use gauge pressure o Bernoulli equation o Momentum balance with
More informationHydraulic Design Of Polyethylene Pipes
Hydraulic Design Of Polyethylene Pipes Waters & Farr polyethylene pipes offer a hydraulically smooth bore that provides excellent flow characteristics. Other advantages of Waters & Farr polyethylene pipes,
More informationChapter 10 Flow in Conduits
Chapter 10 Flow in Conduits 10.1 Classifying Flow Laminar Flow and Turbulent Flow Laminar flow Unpredictable Turbulent flow Near entrance: undeveloped developing flow In developing flow, the wall shear
More informationFLOW FRICTION CHARACTERISTICS OF CONCRETE PRESSURE PIPE
11 ACPPA TECHNICAL SERIES FLOW FRICTION CHARACTERISTICS OF CONCRETE PRESSURE PIPE This paper presents formulas to assist in hydraulic design of concrete pressure pipe. There are many formulas to calculate
More informationFriction Factors and Drag Coefficients
Levicky 1 Friction Factors and Drag Coefficients Several equations that we have seen have included terms to represent dissipation of energy due to the viscous nature of fluid flow. For example, in the
More informationDepartment of Energy Fundamentals Handbook. THERMODYNAMICS, HEAT TRANSFER, AND FLUID FLOW, Module 3 Fluid Flow
Department of Energy Fundamentals Handbook THERMODYNAMICS, HEAT TRANSFER, AND FLUID FLOW, Module 3 REFERENCES REFERENCES Streeter, Victor L., Fluid Mechanics, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, ISBN 07-062191-9.
More informationInteraction of Non-Newtonian Fluid Dynamics and Turbulence on the Behavior of Pulp Suspension Flows
ANNUAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORDIC RHEOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL. 13, 2005 Interaction of Non-Newtonian Fluid Dynamics and Turbulence on the Behavior of Pulp Suspension Flows Juha-Pekka T. Huhtanen, and Reijo J.
More informationPrinciples of Convection
Principles of Convection Point Conduction & convection are similar both require the presence of a material medium. But convection requires the presence of fluid motion. Heat transfer through the: Solid
More informationCOURSE NUMBER: ME 321 Fluid Mechanics I 3 credit hour. Basic Equations in fluid Dynamics
COURSE NUMBER: ME 321 Fluid Mechanics I 3 credit hour Basic Equations in fluid Dynamics Course teacher Dr. M. Mahbubur Razzaque Professor Department of Mechanical Engineering BUET 1 Description of Fluid
More informationDigital Simulation for the Behavior of the Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids in 90 Pipe Bend
International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR) ISSN: 2321-0869 (O) 2454-4698 (P), Volume-3, Issue-8, August 2015 Digital Simulation for the Behavior of the Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids
More informationLesson 6 Review of fundamentals: Fluid flow
Lesson 6 Review of fundamentals: Fluid flow The specific objective of this lesson is to conduct a brief review of the fundamentals of fluid flow and present: A general equation for conservation of mass
More informationLOSSES DUE TO PIPE FITTINGS
LOSSES DUE TO PIPE FITTINGS Aim: To determine the losses across the fittings in a pipe network Theory: The resistance to flow in a pipe network causes loss in the pressure head along the flow. The overall
More information1-Reynold s Experiment
Lect.No.8 2 nd Semester Flow Dynamics in Closed Conduit (Pipe Flow) 1 of 21 The flow in closed conduit ( flow in pipe ) is differ from this occur in open channel where the flow in pipe is at a pressure
More informationChapter 6. Losses due to Fluid Friction
Chapter 6 Losses due to Fluid Friction 1 Objectives ä To measure the pressure drop in the straight section of smooth, rough, and packed pipes as a function of flow rate. ä To correlate this in terms of
More informationChapter 8: Flow in Pipes
Objectives 1. Have a deeper understanding of laminar and turbulent flow in pipes and the analysis of fully developed flow 2. Calculate the major and minor losses associated with pipe flow in piping networks
More information5. MODELING OF NON-STRATIFIED MIXTURE FLOWS (Pseudo-homogeneous flows)
5. MODELING OF NON-STRATIFIED MIXTURE FLOWS (Pseudo-homogeneous flows) Uniform (or almost uniform) distribution of transported solids across a pipeline cross section is characteristic of pseudo-homogeneous
More informationFACULTY OF CHEMICAL & ENERGY ENGINEERING FLUID MECHANICS LABORATORY TITLE OF EXPERIMENT: MINOR LOSSES IN PIPE (E4)
FACULTY OF CHEMICAL & ENERGY ENGINEERING FLUID MECHANICS LABORATORY TITLE OF EXPERIMENT: MINOR LOSSES IN PIPE (E4) 1 1.0 Objectives The objective of this experiment is to calculate loss coefficient (K
More informationOn the Rheological Parameters Governing Oilwell Cement Slurry Stability
ANNUAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORDIC RHEOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL. 12, 2004 On the Rheological Parameters Governing Oilwell Cement Slurry Stability Roni Gandelman, Cristiane Miranda, Kleber Teixeira, André L. Martins
More informationFluids, Hole Cleaning and Tripping Optimization
Fluids, Hole Cleaning and Tripping Optimization Overview Hole cleaning in highly deviated wells is probably one of the most misunderstood concepts. Primarily, relying on Plastic Viscosity and Yield Point
More informationRotational viscometers
42 Non-Newtonian Flow in the Process Industries Rotational viscometers Due to their relative importance as tools for the rheological characterisation of non-newtonian fluid behaviour, we concentrate on
More informationwhere = rate of change of total energy of the system, = rate of heat added to the system, = rate of work done by the system
The Energy Equation for Control Volumes Recall, the First Law of Thermodynamics: where = rate of change of total energy of the system, = rate of heat added to the system, = rate of work done by the system
More informationWater & Wastewater Mixing (WWM)
Water & Wastewater Mixing (WWM) Steve Bungay October 2011 BHR Group offer Research Consultancy Product development in the field of Water, Environment and Power (WEP) With a multi-disciplinary team covering
More informationReynolds, an engineering professor in early 1880 demonstrated two different types of flow through an experiment:
7 STEADY FLOW IN PIPES 7.1 Reynolds Number Reynolds, an engineering professor in early 1880 demonstrated two different types of flow through an experiment: Laminar flow Turbulent flow Reynolds apparatus
More informationFluid Flow. Fundamentals of Rheology. Rheology is the science of deformation and flow. Food rheology is the material science of food
Fluid Flow Outline Fundamentals and applications of rheology Shear stress and shear rate Viscosity and types of viscometers Rheological classification of fluids Apparent viscosity Effect of temperature
More informationWater & Wastewater Mixing: Lighting Up A Dark Art (or cramming a quart into a pint pot!)
Water & Wastewater Mixing: Lighting Up A Dark Art (or cramming a quart into a pint pot!) Dr Mick Dawson Process Director mdawson@bhrgroup.co.uk 25th October 2011 BHR Group 2011 BHR Group is a trading name
More informationGeology 550 Spring 2005 LAB 3: HYDRAULICS OF PRAIRIE CREEK
Geology 550 Spring 2005 LAB 3: HYDRAULICS OF PRAIRIE CREEK Objectives: 1. To examine the distribution of velocity in a stream channel 2. To characterize the state of flow using dimensionless variables
More informationLecture 7. Rheology. Hamid Alghurabi. Assistant Lecturer in Pharmaceutics
Physical Pharmacy Lecture 7 Rheology Assistant Lecturer in Pharmaceutics Overview Types of flow Newtonian systems Non-Newtonian systems Thixotropy Definition Applications in formulations Determination
More informationCHAPTER 3. CONVENTIONAL RHEOMETRY: STATE-OF-THE-ART. briefly introduces conventional rheometers. In sections 3.2 and 3.
30 CHAPTER 3. CONVENTIONAL RHEOMETRY: STATE-OF-THE-ART This chapter reviews literature on conventional rheometries. Section 3.1 briefly introduces conventional rheometers. In sections 3.2 and 3.3, viscometers
More informationACCOUNTING FOR FRICTION IN THE BERNOULLI EQUATION FOR FLOW THROUGH PIPES
ACCOUNTING FOR FRICTION IN THE BERNOULLI EQUATION FOR FLOW THROUGH PIPES Some background information first: We have seen that a major limitation of the Bernoulli equation is that it does not account for
More informationFluid Flow Analysis Penn State Chemical Engineering
Fluid Flow Analysis Penn State Chemical Engineering Revised Spring 2015 Table of Contents LEARNING OBJECTIVES... 1 EXPERIMENTAL OBJECTIVES AND OVERVIEW... 1 PRE-LAB STUDY... 2 EXPERIMENTS IN THE LAB...
More informationAn-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department. Fluid Mechanics. Chapter 1. General Introduction
1 An-Najah National University Civil Engineering Department Fluid Mechanics Chapter 1 General Introduction 2 What is Fluid Mechanics? Mechanics deals with the behavior of both stationary and moving bodies
More informationDetermining Liquid Capacity 4 th Annual Pipeline Knowledge Retention Chris Sonneborn November 7, 2013
Determining Liquid Capacity 4 th Annual Pipeline Knowledge Retention Chris Sonneborn November 7, 2013 Outline What is important? Liquid Properties Thermal Conditions Hydraulic Gradient Flow Regime in Liquids
More informationThe Art of Mixing, Anaerobic Digesters
The Art of Mixing, Anaerobic Digesters Dr Hara Papachristou Process Engineer hpapachristou@bhrgroup.co.uk 25th October 2011 BHR Group 2011 BHR Group is a trading name of VirtualPiE Limited www.bhrgroup.com
More informationTHINK FLUID DYNAMIX CFD Simulation of Clarifiers. THINK Fluid Dynamix
THINK FLUID DYNAMIX CFD Simulation of Clarifiers Provided by: THINK Fluid Dynamix Am Pestalozziring 21 D-91058 Erlangen (Germany) Tel. +49 (0)9131 69098-00 http://www.think-fd.com CFD ENGINEERING & CONSULTING
More informationAPPENDIX A USEFUL EQUATIONS (METRIC AND IMPERIAL SYSTEMS) THE DEFINITION OF VISCOSITY RHEOLOGICAL (VISCOUS BEHAVIOR) PROPERTIES OF FLUIDS
APPENDIX A USEFUL EQUATIONS (METRIC AND IMPERIAL SYSTEMS) THE DEFINITION OF VISCOSITY RHEOLOGICAL (VISCOUS BEHAVIOR) PROPERTIES OF FLUIDS A APPENDIX A APPENDIX A Flow vs. velocity Specific gravity vs.
More informationChemical Engineering 3P04 Process Control Tutorial # 1 Learning goals
Chemical Engineering 3P04 Process Control Tutorial # 1 Learning goals 1. Sensor Principles with the flow sensor example 2. The typical manipulated variable: flow through a conduit Sensors: We need them
More informationThe effect of geometric parameters on the head loss factor in headers
Fluid Structure Interaction V 355 The effect of geometric parameters on the head loss factor in headers A. Mansourpour & S. Shayamehr Mechanical Engineering Department, Azad University of Karaj, Iran Abstract
More informationSTEADY FLOW THROUGH PIPES DARCY WEISBACH EQUATION FOR FLOW IN PIPES. HAZEN WILLIAM S FORMULA, LOSSES IN PIPELINES, HYDRAULIC GRADE LINES AND ENERGY
STEADY FLOW THROUGH PIPES DARCY WEISBACH EQUATION FOR FLOW IN PIPES. HAZEN WILLIAM S FORMULA, LOSSES IN PIPELINES, HYDRAULIC GRADE LINES AND ENERGY LINES 1 SIGNIFICANCE OF CONDUITS In considering the convenience
More informationvector H. If O is the point about which moments are desired, the angular moment about O is given:
The angular momentum A control volume analysis can be applied to the angular momentum, by letting B equal to angularmomentum vector H. If O is the point about which moments are desired, the angular moment
More informationExperiment (4): Flow measurement
Experiment (4): Flow measurement Introduction: The flow measuring apparatus is used to familiarize the students with typical methods of flow measurement of an incompressible fluid and, at the same time
More informationEXPERIMENT II - FRICTION LOSS ALONG PIPE AND LOSSES AT PIPE FITTINGS
MM 30 FLUID MECHANICS II Prof. Dr. Nuri YÜCEL Yrd. Doç. Dr. Nureddin DİNLER Arş. Gör. Dr. Salih KARAASLAN Arş. Gör. Fatih AKTAŞ EXPERIMENT II - FRICTION LOSS ALONG PIPE AND LOSSES AT PIPE FITTINGS A. Objective:
More informationSKM DRILLING ENGINEERING. Chapter 3 - Drilling Hydraulics
1 SKM 3413 - DRILLING ENGINEERING Chapter 3 - Drilling Hydraulics Assoc. Prof. Abdul Razak Ismail Petroleum Engineering Dept. Faculty of Petroleum & Renewable Energy Eng. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
More informationUNIT II Real fluids. FMM / KRG / MECH / NPRCET Page 78. Laminar and turbulent flow
UNIT II Real fluids The flow of real fluids exhibits viscous effect that is they tend to "stick" to solid surfaces and have stresses within their body. You might remember from earlier in the course Newtons
More informationPipe Flow/Friction Factor Calculations using Excel Spreadsheets
Pipe Flow/Friction Factor Calculations using Excel Spreadsheets Harlan H. Bengtson, PE, PhD Emeritus Professor of Civil Engineering Southern Illinois University Edwardsville Table of Contents Introduction
More informationPressure and Flow Characteristics
Pressure and Flow Characteristics Continuing Education from the American Society of Plumbing Engineers August 2015 ASPE.ORG/ReadLearnEarn CEU 226 READ, LEARN, EARN Note: In determining your answers to
More informationWhen water (fluid) flows in a pipe, for example from point A to point B, pressure drop will occur due to the energy losses (major and minor losses).
PRESSURE DROP AND OSSES IN PIPE When water (luid) lows in a pipe, or example rom point A to point B, pressure drop will occur due to the energy losses (major and minor losses). A B Bernoulli equation:
More informationCVE 372 HYDROMECHANICS EXERCISE PROBLEMS
VE 37 HYDROMEHNIS EXERISE PROLEMS 1. pump that has the characteristic curve shown in the accompanying graph is to be installed in the system shown. What will be the discharge of water in the system? Take
More informationAn overview of the Hydraulics of Water Distribution Networks
An overview of the Hydraulics of Water Distribution Networks June 21, 2017 by, P.E. Senior Water Resources Specialist, Santa Clara Valley Water District Adjunct Faculty, San José State University 1 Outline
More informationUniversal Viscosity Curve Theory
TM Universal Viscosity Curve Theory Turbine Flow Meters and Flow Viscosity Introduction Like any transducer, a turbine flow meter is sensitive to physical parameters other than the one which is of interest.
More information6. Expressions for Describing Steady Shear Non-Newtonian Flow
Non-Newtonian Flows Modified from the Comsol ChE Library module. Rev 10/15/08 2:30PM Modified by Robert P. Hesketh, Chemical Engineering, Rowan University Fall 2008 http://ciks.cbt.nist.gov/~garbocz/sp946/node8.htm
More informationFLUID MECHANICS PROF. DR. METİN GÜNER COMPILER
FLUID MECHANICS PROF. DR. METİN GÜNER COMPILER ANKARA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY AND TECHNOLOGIES ENGINEERING 1 5. FLOW IN PIPES 5.1.3. Pressure and Shear Stress
More informationCorrections to flow data in polymer melts
Corrections to flow data in polymer melts Narongrit Sombatsompop Polymer PROcessing and Flow (P-PROF) Materials Technology, School of Energy & Materials King Mongkut s University of Technology Thonburi
More informationEngineers Edge, LLC PDH & Professional Training
510 N. Crosslane Rd. Monroe, Georgia 30656 (770) 266-6915 fax (678) 643-1758 Engineers Edge, LLC PDH & Professional Training Copyright, All Rights Reserved Engineers Edge, LLC Pipe Flow-Friction Factor
More informationRheology and Constitutive Equations. Rheology = Greek verb to flow. Rheology is the study of the flow and deformation of materials.
Rheology and Constitutive Equations Rheology = Greek verb to flow Rheology is the study of the flow and deformation of materials. The focus of rheology is primarily on the study of fundamental, or constitutive,
More informationPipe Flow. Lecture 17
Pipe Flow Lecture 7 Pipe Flow and the Energy Equation For pipe flow, the Bernoulli equation alone is not sufficient. Friction loss along the pipe, and momentum loss through diameter changes and corners
More informationWASTEWATER SLUDGE PIPELINE PREDICTIONS USING CONVENTIONAL VISCOMETRY AND ULTRASOUND BASED RHEOMETRY
18th International Conference on TRANSPORT AND SEDIMENTATION OF SOLID PARTICLES 11-15 September 2017, Prague, Czech Republic ISSN 0867-7964 ISBN 978-83-7717-269-8 WASTEWATER SLUDGE PIPELINE PREDICTIONS
More informationPiping Systems and Flow Analysis (Chapter 3)
Piping Systems and Flow Analysis (Chapter 3) 2 Learning Outcomes (Chapter 3) Losses in Piping Systems Major losses Minor losses Pipe Networks Pipes in series Pipes in parallel Manifolds and Distribution
More informationChapter 7 The Energy Equation
Chapter 7 The Energy Equation 7.1 Energy, Work, and Power When matter has energy, the matter can be used to do work. A fluid can have several forms of energy. For example a fluid jet has kinetic energy,
More informationOPERATIONAL PROBLEMS IN PUMPING NON-SETTLING SLURRIES RESOLVED USING AN IMPROVED LAMINAR FLOW PIPE FITTING LOSS MODEL
Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Pump Users Symposium September 24-27, 202, Houston, Texas OPERATIONAL PROBLEMS IN PUMPING NON-SETTLING SLURRIES RESOLVED USING AN IMPROVED LAMINAR FLOW PIPE
More informationME 305 Fluid Mechanics I. Part 8 Viscous Flow in Pipes and Ducts. Flow in Pipes and Ducts. Flow in Pipes and Ducts (cont d)
ME 305 Fluid Mechanics I Flow in Pipes and Ducts Flow in closed conduits (circular pipes and non-circular ducts) are very common. Part 8 Viscous Flow in Pipes and Ducts These presentations are prepared
More informationBasic Fluid Mechanics
Basic Fluid Mechanics Chapter 6A: Internal Incompressible Viscous Flow 4/16/2018 C6A: Internal Incompressible Viscous Flow 1 6.1 Introduction For the present chapter we will limit our study to incompressible
More informationThe Mechatronics Design for Measuring Fluid Friction Losses in Pipe Flows Rıza Gurbuz
Solid State Phenomena Vol. 113 (2006) pp 603-608 Online available since 2006/Jun/15 at www.scientific.net (2006) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.113.603 The Mechatronics
More informationREE 307 Fluid Mechanics II. Lecture 1. Sep 27, Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy. Zewail City for Science and Technology
REE 307 Fluid Mechanics II Lecture 1 Sep 27, 2017 Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy Zewail City for Science and Technology Course Materials drahmednagib.com 2 COURSE OUTLINE Fundamental of Flow in pipes
More informationHydraulics and hydrology
Hydraulics and hydrology - project exercises - Class 4 and 5 Pipe flow Discharge (Q) (called also as the volume flow rate) is the volume of fluid that passes through an area per unit time. The discharge
More informationHydraulics! 10 An Overview!
Hydraulics! 10 An Overview! Introduction to Well Engineering - 10 - Hydraulics 1 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Flow Regime & Reynolds Number 9 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 Laminar / Turbulent Boundary in a Newtonian
More informationEffect of radius ratio on pressure drop across a 90 bend for high concentration coal ash slurries
This paper is part of the Proceedings of the 11 International Conference th on Engineering Sciences (AFM 2016) www.witconferences.com Effect of radius ratio on pressure drop across a 90 bend for high concentration
More informationEXPERIMENT No.1 FLOW MEASUREMENT BY ORIFICEMETER
EXPERIMENT No.1 FLOW MEASUREMENT BY ORIFICEMETER 1.1 AIM: To determine the co-efficient of discharge of the orifice meter 1.2 EQUIPMENTS REQUIRED: Orifice meter test rig, Stopwatch 1.3 PREPARATION 1.3.1
More informationApplied Fluid Mechanics
Applied Fluid Mechanics 1. The Nature of Fluid and the Study of Fluid Mechanics 2. Viscosity of Fluid 3. Pressure Measurement 4. Forces Due to Static Fluid 5. Buoyancy and Stability 6. Flow of Fluid and
More informationApplied Fluid Mechanics
Applied Fluid Mechanics 1. The Nature of Fluid and the Study of Fluid Mechanics 2. Viscosity of Fluid 3. Pressure Measurement 4. Forces Due to Static Fluid 5. Buoyancy and Stability 6. Flow of Fluid and
More informationHydroelectric Design
INTERAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BAYAMON PUERTO RICO Hydroelectric Design Dr. Eduardo G. Pérez Díaz Erik T. Rosado González 5/14/2012 Hydroelectric design project for fluid class. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF
More informationMeasurement and Prediction of Fluid Viscosities at High Shear Rates
Chapter 5 Measurement and Prediction of Fluid Viscosities at High Shear Rates Jeshwanth K. Rameshwaram and Tien T. Dao Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/54282
More informationFLOW IN CONDUITS. Shear stress distribution across a pipe section. Chapter 10
Chapter 10 Shear stress distribution across a pipe section FLOW IN CONDUITS For steady, uniform flow, the momentum balance in s for the fluid cylinder yields Fluid Mechanics, Spring Term 2010 Velocity
More informationUnderstand How Valves & Fittings Affect Head Loss
Understand How Valves & Fittings Affect Head Loss by Ray Hardee (Engineered Software, Inc.) This column discusses valves and fittings and evaluates how these devices affect the operation of piping systems.
More informationTOTAL HEAD, N.P.S.H. AND OTHER CALCULATION EXAMPLES Jacques Chaurette p. eng., June 2003
TOTAL HEAD, N.P.S.H. AND OTHER CALCULATION EXAMPLES Jacques Chaurette p. eng., www.lightmypump.com June 2003 Figure 1 Calculation example flow schematic. Situation Water at 150 F is to be pumped from a
More informationModelling of dispersed, multicomponent, multiphase flows in resource industries. Section 3: Examples of analyses conducted for Newtonian fluids
Modelling of dispersed, multicomponent, multiphase flows in resource industries Section 3: Examples of analyses conducted for Newtonian fluids Globex Julmester 017 Lecture # 04 July 017 Agenda Lecture
More informationApplied Fluid Mechanics
Applied Fluid Mechanics 1. The Nature of Fluid and the Study of Fluid Mechanics 2. Viscosity of Fluid 3. Pressure Measurement 4. Forces Due to Static Fluid 5. Buoyancy and Stability 6. Flow of Fluid and
More informationChapter 8: Flow in Pipes
8-1 Introduction 8-2 Laminar and Turbulent Flows 8-3 The Entrance Region 8-4 Laminar Flow in Pipes 8-5 Turbulent Flow in Pipes 8-6 Fully Developed Pipe Flow 8-7 Minor Losses 8-8 Piping Networks and Pump
More informationModeling of Suspension Flow in Pipes and Rheometers
Modeling of Suspension Flow in Pipes and Rheometers Nicos S. Martys, Chiara F. Ferraris, William L. George National Institute of Standards and Technology Abstract: Measurement and prediction of the flow
More informationV/ t = 0 p/ t = 0 ρ/ t = 0. V/ s = 0 p/ s = 0 ρ/ s = 0
UNIT III FLOW THROUGH PIPES 1. List the types of fluid flow. Steady and unsteady flow Uniform and non-uniform flow Laminar and Turbulent flow Compressible and incompressible flow Rotational and ir-rotational
More informationWhat we know about Fluid Mechanics. What we know about Fluid Mechanics
What we know about Fluid Mechanics 1. Survey says. 3. Image from: www.axs.com 4. 5. 6. 1 What we know about Fluid Mechanics 1. MEB (single input, single output, steady, incompressible, no rxn, no phase
More informationEngineering Fluid Mechanics
Engineering Fluid Mechanics Eighth Edition Clayton T. Crowe WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY, PULLMAN Donald F. Elger UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO, MOSCOW John A. Roberson WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY, PULLMAN WILEY
More informationDrilling Fluid Thixotropy & Relevance
ANNUAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORDIC RHEOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL. 13, 2005 Drilling Fluid Thixotropy & Relevance Richard Jachnik1, 1Baker Hughes INTEQ, Stoneywood Park North, Dyce, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK ABSTRACT
More informationJl. Kusumanegara 157 Yogyakarta 55165, Indonesia. PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Tronoh, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
On the Numerical Simulations of Drag Forces Exerted by Subaqueous Mudflow on Pipeline: A Laboratory Experiment Assessment Zainul Faizien Haza 1,a and Indra Sati Hamonangan Harahap 2,b 1 Department of Civil
More informationOn-line measurement of rheological parameters for feedback control of thickeners
On-line measurement of rheological parameters for feedback control of thickeners ABSTACT 21 Alex van der Spek ZDoor BV, The Netherlands obert Maron CiDA Minerals Processing Inc., USA ABSTACT Thickened
More informationUNIT II CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER
UNIT II CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER Convection is the mode of heat transfer between a surface and a fluid moving over it. The energy transfer in convection is predominately due to the bulk motion of the fluid
More informationCalculation of Power and Flow Capacity of Rotor / Stator Devices in VisiMix RSD Program.
Calculation of Power and Flow Capacity of Rotor / Stator Devices in VisiMix RSD Program. L.N.Braginsky, D.Sc. (Was invited to be presented on the CHISA 2010-13th Conference on Process Integration, Modelling
More informationStudy of the Rheological Behavior of the Phosphate- Water Slurry and Search for a Suitable Model to Describe its Rheological Behavior
International Journal of Mechanical & Mechatronics Engineering IJMME-IJENS Vol:18 No:04 73 Study of the Rheological Behavior of the Phosphate- Water Slurry and Search for a Suitable Model to Describe its
More information