Seismic modelling of unconventional reservoirs
|
|
- Clement Cannon
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FOCUS ARTICLE Coordinated by Satinder Chopra / Meghan Brown Seismic modelling of unconventional reservoirs Marco Perez Apache Canada Ltd., Calgary, Alberta, Canada Introduction Unconventional resource development has become an exercise in determining where horizontal wells should be placed to maximize hydro-fracture efficiency. A large part of optimizing how the resource is developed requires understanding the reservoir from both lithologic and rock properties perspectives and correlating these with production data to infer frac efficiency. Given the variety of unconventional plays in North America, it is important to understand the differences in rock properties so as to effectively map them seismically. Figure shows backscattered electron images displaying the diversity in microstructure beyond the differences in lithology. Understanding the variations in terms of mineralogical composition and microstructure requires an in depth model. With such a model, templates can be generated for interpretation of seismic attributes. previous important works followed by suggesting potential application to unconventional reservoirs. The first is a granular model referred to as the modified Hertz-Mindlin Hashin-Shtrikman (HMHS) while the second, referred to as the Non-Interacting Approximation (NIA) is an inclusion based model which describes the number of pores and their shapes as opposed to the grain to grain contacts. The modified Hertz-Mindlin Hashin-Shtrikman (HMHS) This model is a granular representation of a rock in that it assumes a random packing of spheres under hydrostatic compression. Contact between spheres is used to estimate bulk and shear moduli in terms of normal and tangential stiffness. The expressions for the dry bulk and shear moduli, known as the Hertz-Mindlin estimates, are given by (Dvorkin and Nur, 996) K dry = Kdry = The following is an examination of two distinct rock physics models and how they can be employed to generate seismic interpretation templates. These templates can then be used in conjunction with inverted volumes of seismic attributes to map lithologic and rock property variations. In addition, from the rock physics trends, AVO models are synthesized to evaluate potential offset dependent amplitude responses. ( ϕ) n πr SN Gdry = Gdry = (0 ϕπ )n R ( ϕ ) n ( ϕ ) n 0π R ( SN ξ S T ) SN. ( SN ξ S T ). π R where n is the coordination number (number of grain contacts), f is the amount of porosity, x is a grain frictional coefficient (more on this later), and R is the grain radius. The normal and tangential stiffnesses are Two different rock physics models SN = 4 Ga v. ST = a v 4. 4Ga v The process begins with a comparison of two distinct rock physics models. Each model will be reviewed, referencing ST = SN = a v where G and v are the shear modulus and Poisson s ratio of the sphere. The variable a is the radius of the contact area between the two spheres and an estimate is given by Hertz,88 (Duffaut et. al, 00), F R ( v ) a N a FN R ( v) 5. where FN is the confining force acting between the two spheres, given by F R ( v ) a N a FN R ( v) 6. and P is the effective hydrostatic confining pressure. Figure. Backscattered electron image of 9 different North American unconventional plays (Curtis et. al 00). The scalar value of x varies between 0 and where 0 implies no friction between grains and implies infinite friction. There are models that describe the variation of the parameter x. Duffaut et. al (00) and Bachrach and Avseth (008) studied the impact of the parameter and proposed non-linear and linear expressions, respectively, to model frictional variations. Bachrach and Avseth (008) also investigate the effects of grain shape (round versus angular) with respect to the contact radius and its influence on the bulk and shear moduli. Continued on Page CSEG RECORDER April 0
2 HS ± f f fn 4 K =... G K G K G K G n G = f f f HS± G z G z... n G z z n G 9K z = 6 K G solid incl solid incl p = σε = σ S σ σ S σ = σ S S incl incl solid pores cracks S = S S S σ = ϕ σ avg ε ε = S incl σ p = σε Continued from Page 54 The Hertz-Mindlin estimate of K and G is used to describe a rock at the critical porosity end member. This end member is assumed to represent the starting point of rock formation. Any porosity greater than the critical porosity will result in grains in suspension; not frame supported (Nur et. al, 998). The Hashin- Shtrikman bounds are used to connect the critical porosity and the solid, zero porosity end member to create upper and lower limits for porosity values between the end members. This tren is schematically shown in figure, along with the associated LMR representation. These upper and lower bounds have been used to describe cementing and sorting trends (Avseth et. al, 00). The Non-Interacting Approximation (NIA) The second model, referred to as the non-interacting approximation (NIA), has been explored (Kachanov 99, Kachanov et. al, 994 and Shafiro and Kachanov, 996) in great detail. This approach constructs the elastic potential of a solid with cavities (pores of various shapes including cracks) for both isotropic and anisotropic scenarios. The basic form of the NIA expression is a sum of individual compliances of components comprising the rock (Vernik and Kachanov 00) and is illustrated in figure. solid pores S = S S S Note that the expression is linear in compliance and differs from Husdon s approach in that Hudson deals with stiffness and has a linearization approximation. cracks 0. Figure. Schematic representation of NIA model. Composite material is a function of solid and various cavities. Figure. Schematic representation of Hashin-Shtrikman bound with critical porosity and mineral end members. From the bulk and shear modulus (not shown) expressions, LMR, or any other seismic attribute, templates can be constructed. The Hashin-Shtrikman bounds describe lower and upper limits to n-phase mixtures. The Hashin-Shtrikman bounds have the form (Mavko et. al, 009) where K HS ± f f fn = K G K G Kn G G HS± 4 G where K n and G n are the bulk and shear moduli of each phase, f n is the fractional quantity of each phase and G is the maximum (upper bound) or minimum (lower bound) shear modulus of all the phases. In the modified HMHS, which incorporates the critical porosity concept, the bounds consist of two phases (n=): the Hertz- Mindlin defined critical porosity and the mineral, zero porosity end member. f = f fn... G z G z G z z G 9K z = 6 K G n The elastic potential is p = σε. where s is stress and e is the strain. Hooke s Law is invoked to describe the strain on the object as solidε σ ε = S σ ε = S solid ε where S solid is the compliance of the solid material and De is the additional strain due to inclusions defined by = S incl σ where S incl is the so called cavity compliance tensor. For each cavity of interest, the cavity compliance tensor S incl must be calculated. The total compliance of the material is the sum of the solid plus the cavity compliance for each pore shape being described. The elastic potential can then be expressed as solid incl solid incl p = σε = σ S σ σ S σ = σ 4. S S incl incl Once the equation has been set up with appropriate cavity compliance tensors for each pore shape, the moduli of interest can be determined from the stress strain relation. The compliance matrix S can be of any form and is not exclusively appropriate for isotropic materials. In this instance, the analysis will be restricted to the isotropic scenarios (a subsequent paper will delve into the anisotropic models). To account for the interaction between cavities, Kachanov proposes using Mori-Tanaka s scheme (97) where the average stress of the effective material is σ avg = ϕ σ.. 5. The expression for s avg now replaces s in equation. Continued on Page 56 April 0 CSEG RECORDER 55
3 Continued from Page 55 As per Vernik and Kachanov (00), a spherical pores and crack density expression would be ( vv ) ϕϕ 6( vvsolid ) ηϕ K = Ksolid solid ( solid ) 9( solid ) 6 ( vsolid ( vsolid ) ϕ ) η K = K solid ( vsolid ) ϕ 9 ( vsolid ) ϕ 6. 5 ( vsolid ) ϕ ( vsolid )( 5 vsolid ) η 7. G = Gsolid 7 5 vsolid ϕ 45 ( vsolid ) ϕ 5(7 vv ) ϕϕ ( v )(5 v ) ηϕ G = Gsolid solid solid solid 5 solid 45( vsolid) where v is the Poisson s ratio of the solid, f is porosity and n is the crack density. Note that:. there is no stress dependence in this expression. porosity affects cracks, but cracks do not affect porosity. Model comparison Figure 4. (Left) Bulk modulus (upper) and Shear modulus (lower) as a function of porosity for granular (HMHS) and inclusion (NIA) models. The black and brown trends have an effective stress of MPa and 0 MPa respectively. (Right) LMR representation of rock physics trends. The following will be an examination of the two different rock physics models introduced. Specifically, the impact of pore shape as described by the NIA model is investigated in an attempt to rationalize differences between the granular and inclusion models. For the trends that follow, the rock is composed of 50% quartz, 5% clay and 5% limestone, representative of unconventional reservoirs. Figure 4 shows the differences between the granular model and inclusion model with spherical cavities. It is immediately apparent that the NIA model generates much larger values of bulk modulus (K) and shear modulus (G) for various amounts of porosity. The blue dotted line overlies the solid blue line in LMR space. This means that the Vp/Vs ratio of the trend does not change by accounting for pore interactions; it is merely a change in porosity scale. To rationalize differences between the models, an attempt to match the trends is made by adding pores of different shapes in the inclusion (NIA) model, shown in figure 5. The first attempt is the inclusion of infinitely thin cracks. The impact of cracks is to decrease K and G with increase in crack density, n. As in the previous figure, in addition to the K and G versus porosity / crack density plots, an LMR crossplot is included to demonstrate the expected response in a seismic attribute space. Note that at large porosities the effects of cracks is minimal. Figure 5. (Left) Bulk modulus (upper) and Shear modulus (lower) as a function of porosity for inclusion (NIA) model with porosity (blue) and crack density (red). Each blue curve in an increase in crack density (seen vertically) while the red curve is an increase in porosity. The next pore shape shown in figure 6, is that of penny-shaped cracks. The impact is larger than in the infinitely thin cracks. At first glance, it is observed that the appropriate pore shape and concentration could be constructed to mimic the granular trends. Though not demonstrated in the figures, it is postulated that the granular trends could be a representation of many different pore shapes ranging from spherical pores, penny-shaped cracks and thin cracks at high porosities, to just thin cracks at low porosities. Fluid Effects For fluid-filled pore spaces, Gassmann s theory for fluid substitution (Smith, 00) can be used to estimate the bulk and shear moduli for various amounts of porosity and fluids. Gassmann s fluid substitution is suitable for the NIA and HSHM models Figure 6. (Left) Bulk modulus (upper) and Shear modulus (lower) as a function of porosity for inclusion (NIA) model with porosity (blue) and penny-shaped crack density (red). Each blue curve in an increase in crack density (seen vertically) while the red curve is an increase in porosity. Continued on Page CSEG RECORDER April 0
4 Continued from Page 56 For thin cracks the response in LMR space is shown in figure 9. The left figure shows the gas response while the right shows the oil response. Note that there is a slight increase in lr as the cracks become filled with incompressible fluids. The presence of fluid strengthens the rock as seen from the parameter l. The combination of figure 8 and 9 show the impact of crack aspect ratio in conjunction with the presence of fluids. Multi-mineral models Figure 7. (Left) LMR crossplot of gas filled rock physics trends. (Right) LMR crossplot of oil filled rock physics trends. (Grechka, 007). The special case of fluid-filled cracks is shown to have a dependence on the crack aspect ratio as well as the fluid itself (Shafiro and Kachanov, 997). Figure 7 above shows Gassmann s results for gas and oil filled trends. Potential unconventional templates can be modelled as a mixture of quartz, clay, and carbonate material, each with varying quantities. How to visualize the available permutations with the number of variables (mineralogy, fluid, porosity, pore shape, etc.) becomes a large part of the interpretation process. Comparing the previous LMR crossplots, there is overlap amongst the trends and thus ambiguity in the interpretation. One way to visualize the various lithologic permutations is to construct a two mineral trend demonstrating the variations in mineralogical composition and porosity. Figure 0 illustrates three such dual mineral trends: quartz-clay, quartz-limestone and limestone-clay. Note that the oil filled low pressure HMHS trends almost completely overly each other. Figure 8 shows the inclusion based model (NIA) incorporating fluids and displaying some interesting results. Figure 8 shows the differences between gas and oil filled penny-shaped cracks (aspect ratio 0.). Figure 0. LMR crossplot of inclusion based model (NIA) for three dual mineral trends. Figure 8. (Left) LMR crossplot of gas filled penny-shaped cracks trends. (Right) LMR crossplot of oil filled penny-shaped cracks trends. Another method could be to select three minerals and determine a distribution that would encompass the majority of potential outcomes. Figure demonstrates the effects of a three mineral combination; quartz, clay and limestone. Examples Examples of well logs from three different unconventional resource plays in western Canada are presented with potential rock physics trends that can be used for interpretation. Each of the three examples will have a unique template in addition to a more generic multi-play template. The generic multi-play template is added to demonstrate the variability in each play with respect to a fixed template. Figure 9. (Left) LMR crossplot of gas filled thin cracks trends. (Right) LMR crossplot of oil filled thin cracks trends. The importance of data integration cannot be overemphasized as using the templates in isolation would leave an interpreter with a myriad of possibilities that would minimize the predictive power of the trends. Without additional constraints, the use of modelled trends is not optimized. Continued on Page CSEG RECORDER April 0
5 Continued from Page 58 attributed entirely to the concentration of penny-shaped cracks. Decreasing LR values are purely a function of increased crack density. Conversely, the crossplot on the right is the template introduced in figure 9. These NIA trends assume spherical pores and varying amounts of minerals. In this case the low LR values correspond to increasing quartz content. The correct interpretation template is likely a combination of these templates as well as other pore shape and mineral combinations. Duvernay Figure shows LMR and GR logs for a Duvernay well, again with two LMR crossplot with two interpretation templates. The carbonate rich section (low GR data approaching 00% limestone trend) corresponds to overlying section. Figure. LMR crossplot of inclusion based model (NIA) for different combination of three mineral trends. Horn River Figure shows LMR and Gamma Ray (GR) logs along side two LMR crossplots each superimposed with two different rock physics interpretation templates. The template on the left assumes a single mineralogical mix of 50% quartz, 5% limestone and 5% clay. The trends are generated using the NIA model. Each blue trend corresponds to increasing amount spherical porosity for a fixed penny-shaped crack density. The red trends correspond to increasing crack density for a fixed amount of spherical porosity. In this case, the LMR reservoir variations are Figure. LMR and GR logs (left) and crossplots (right). Two interpretation scenarios plotted on the crossplots left: NIA gas filled thin cracks with a constant mineral content of 50% Quartz, 5% Limestone and 5% Clay (blue lines) and gas-filled spherical pores with thin crack density of 0. and varying mineralogy (black lines). Right three NIA dual mineral trends; quartz-clay (black), quartz-limestone (green) and limestone-clay (brown). It is noted that the Duvernay interval displays a more linear trend compared to the Horn River data. The log data also manifests itself in a range that can be suitably modeled by the quartz rich templates of figure. With that in mind, the blue trend lines correspond to an NIA model with a constant mineral mix of 50% quartz, 5% clay and 5% limestone, with increasing spherical porosity and a constant amount of gas-filled thin cracks. The black trend lines correspond to an NIA quartz-clay mix with increasing spherical porosity and a constant amount thin crack density. The crossplot on the right are the same trends shown in figure. Given the narrow range of Vp/Vs in the crossplot, one can make the assertion that this well contains very little lithologic variation (or has other minerals with similar bulk and shear moduli as quartz, clay or limestone) and any variations seen could be a function of pore shape. Montney Figure. LMR and GR logs (left) and crossplots (right). Two interpretation scenarios plotted on the crossplots left: gas filled penny-shaped cracks with a constant mineral content of 50% Quartz, 5% Limestone and 5% Clay. Right three NIA dual mineral trends; quartz-clay (black), quartz-limestone (green) and limestone-clay (brown). Figure 4 shows LMR and GR logs for a Montney well as well as set of two interpretation templates. Again, the right crossplot is the dual mineral mix introduced in figure 0. The crossplot on the left however, has NIA trends composed of 60% quartz, 0% dolomite and 0% clay with spherical porosity and various amounts of penny-shaped cracks. The red trends are gas-filled inclusions while the green trends are fluid-filled. Like the Continued on Page 6 60 CSEG RECORDER April 0
6 Continued from Page 60 potential unconventional reservoir. The ability to differentiate between quartz, clay or limestone dominated unconventional targets helps in understanding frac efficiency. Figure 6 shows AVO and LMR plots of what could be representative of a transition from clay dominated to quartz or limestone dominated reservoir. As demonstrated by figure 0, the largest impact in both LMR and AVO signature is a function of quartz content. This could be representative of intra-montney reflections and demonstrates the subtlety in mapping lithologic variations with AVO. Figure 4. LMR and GR logs (left) and crossplots (right). Two interpretation scenarios plotted on the crossplots left: gas filled penny-shaped cracks with a constant mineral content of 60% Quartz, 0% Dolomite and 0% Clay (red lines) and thin oil filled cracks (green lines). Right three NIA dual mineral trends; quartz-clay (black), quartz-limestone (green) and limestone-clay (brown). Figure 5. LMR crossplot (left) and AVO plot (right) showing simple interface These scenarios could be representative of reflection coming from non-reservoir shale to reservoir boundary. Open circle represents overlying layer, closed circle underlying layer. Figure 6. LMR crossplot (left) and AVO plot (right) showing simple interface These scenarios could be representative of inter-reservoir reflections coming from clay dominated to quartz (red) and limestone (blue) dominated reservoirs. Open circle represents overlying layer, closed circle underlying layer. Duvernay, Montney rocks display a linear trend in LMR space, indicative of small Vp/Vs changes within the interval. AVO Template Generation The rock physics trends can also be used to generate a range of potential AVO responses that can be used to interpret seismic data without inverting the data. A large number of different scenarios can be modelled. Note that the four examples shown follow the expected behaviour as outlined in Perez 00. Figure 5 shows the AVO responses expected from a clay rich layer overlying quartz, clay and limestone dominated layer. This may represent the transition from overlying non-reservoir shale to a Figure 7 illustrates the effect of porosity and the ability of LMR and AVO signatures to detect such porosity variations. This shows a decreasing near offset amplitude and decreasing gradient with increasing porosity. Figure 8 models the ability to detect potential carbonate rich frac barriers. In general, because the frac barrier is a stronger material, seismic expression is unsurprisingly a peak. The main control of the zero offset response is the high P-impedance while the lithology variations of the overlying layer control the gradient. Figure 7. LMR crossplot (left) and AVO plot (right) showing simple interface These scenarios could be representative of reflections coming from non-reservoir shale to reservoir with varying amounts of porosity. Open circle represents overlying layer, closed circle underlying layer. Figure 8. LMR crossplot (left) and AVO plot (right) showing simple interface These scenarios could be representative of reflection coming from reservoir shale to potential high carbonate volume frac barriers. Open circle represents overlying layer, closed circle underlying layer. Conclusions Two different rock physics models are introduced and used to interpret unconventional reservoirs from a seismic attribute perspective. The differences between the models are rationalized and potential interpretation templates are provided. Some AVO models are also generated demonstrating potential amplitude variations and the subtle nature of the seismic reflection in unconventional settings. These tools allow for a more in depth interpretation of seismic data. R Continued on Page 6 April 0 CSEG RECORDER 6
7 Continued from Page 6 References Avseth, P., Mukerji, T., Mavko, G., and Dvorkin, J. (00). Rock-physics diagnostics of depositional texture, diagenetic alterations, and reservoir heterogeneity in high-porosity siliciclastic sediments and rocks A review of selected models and suggested work flows. GEOPHYSICS, 75(5), 75A 75A47. Bachrach, R. and Avseth, P. (008). Rock physics modeling of unconsolidated sands: Accounting for nonuniform contacts and heterogeneous stress fields in the effective media approximation with applications to hydrocarbon exploration. GEOPHYSICS, 7(6), E97 E09. Curtis, M.E., Ambrose, R.J., Sondergeld, C.H. and Rai, C.S., 00, Structural Characterization of Gas Shales on the Micro- and Nano-Scales, CUSG/SPE 769. Dvorkin, J. and Nur, A. (996). Elasticity of high porosity sandstones: Theory for two North Sea data sets. GEOPHYSICS, 6(5), Duffaut, K., Landrø, M., and Sollie, R. (00). Using Mindlin theory to model friction-dependent shear modulus in granular media. GEOPHYSICS, 75(), E4 E5. Grechka, V., 997, Fluid Substitution in porous and fractured solids: the non-interaction approximation and gassmann theory, Int J. Fract., 48, Kachanov, M., 99, Effective elastic properties of cracked solids: critical review of some basic concepts, Appl Mech Rev, 45, 8, Kachanov, M. Tsukrov, I. ad Shafiro, B. 994, Effective moduli of solids with cavities of various shapes, Appl. Mech. Rev. 47,, S5-S74. Mavko, G., T. Mukerji, and J. Dvorkin, 009, The rock physics handbook, nd ed.: Cambridge University Press. Mori, T and Tanaka, K., 97, Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions, Acta Met,, Nur, A., Mavko, G., Dvorkin, J., and Galmudi, D. (998). Critical porosity: A key to relating physical properties to porosity in rocks. The Leading Edge, 7(), Perez M., Beyond isotropy in AVO and LMR: CSEG RECORDER, 5(7), 7-4 Shafiro, B. and Kachanov, M. 996, Materials with fluid-filled pores of various shapes: effective elastic properties and fluid pressure polarization, Int. J. Solids Structures, 4, 7, Smith, T., Sondergeld, C., and Rai, C. (00). Gassmann fluid substitutions: A tutorial. GEOPHYSICS, 68(), Vernik, L. and Kachanov, M. (00). Modeling elastic properties of siliciclastic rocks. GEOPHYSICS, 75(6), E7 E8. Marco Perez received his B.Sc. at McGill University before completing an M.Sc. in Geophysics at the University of Calgary. He started working at PanCanadian, later EnCana, focusing on AVO, inversion and LMR analysis. After moving to Apache in 007 Marco has continued to work with advanced geophysical techniques within the Exploration & Production Technology group where he is currently a Senior Staff Geophysicist. Letter to the Editor Earth Science for Society is Reborn You may recall the very well-done public outreach event called Earth Science for Society ( ESfS ) that has been held in conjunction with our geoscience convention the past few years. As a public and schools outreach event it was very successful; the only catch was it took a lot of convention time away from a host of volunteers. Planning and operating that Earth Science for Society event is a huge and costly undertaking, and needs dedicated volunteers and an organization to help operate it. The really good news is that APEGA has stepped forward and will be the lead organization, providing staff support and backstopping the fundraising/sponsorship, as well as some key volunteers. The CSEG and CSPG will be supporting organizations. We have the opportunity to make a stand-alone 04 Earth Science for Society event a tremendous success and for years to come something for which all geoscientists to be proud. I d like to personally thank APEGA and Tom Sneddon for stepping forward; this is not a small undertaking. APEGA has been trying hard for some time now to work with us and be supportive of many of the events of the CSEG and CSEG Foundation; quite a change from years gone by. FYI there is also a key group of volunteers from the CSEG who will help make this renewed Earth Science for Society happen; we are in your debt. R Perry Kotkas (Perry is currently Chair of the CSEG Foundation) 6 CSEG RECORDER April 0
ROCK PHYSICS MODELING FOR LITHOLOGY PREDICTION USING HERTZ- MINDLIN THEORY
ROCK PHYSICS MODELING FOR LITHOLOGY PREDICTION USING HERTZ- MINDLIN THEORY Ida Ayu PURNAMASARI*, Hilfan KHAIRY, Abdelazis Lotfy ABDELDAYEM Geoscience and Petroleum Engineering Department Universiti Teknologi
More informationGeological Classification of Seismic-Inversion Data in the Doba Basin of Chad*
Geological Classification of Seismic-Inversion Data in the Doba Basin of Chad* Carl Reine 1, Chris Szelewski 2, and Chaminda Sandanayake 3 Search and Discovery Article #41899 (2016)** Posted September
More informationROCK PHYSICS DIAGNOSTICS OF NORTH SEA SANDS: LINK BETWEEN MICROSTRUCTURE AND SEISMIC PROPERTIES ABSTRACT
ROCK PHYSICS DIAGNOSTICS OF NORTH SEA SANDS: LINK BETWEEN MICROSTRUCTURE AND SEISMIC PROPERTIES PER AVSETH, JACK DVORKIN, AND GARY MAVKO Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, CA 94305-2215, USA
More informationWe Density/Porosity Versus Velocity of Overconsolidated Sands Derived from Experimental Compaction SUMMARY
We 6 Density/Porosity Versus Velocity of Overconsolidated Sands Derived from Experimental Compaction S. Narongsirikul* (University of Oslo), N.H. Mondol (University of Oslo and Norwegian Geotechnical Inst)
More informationCompeting Effect of Pore Fluid and Texture -- Case Study
Competing Effect of Pore Fluid and Texture -- Case Study Depth (m) Sw Sxo. m Poisson's Ratio.. GOC.1 5 7 8 9 P-Impedance OWC 15 GR.. RHOB.5 1 Saturation...5. 1. 1.5 Vs (km/s).. Poisson's Ratio 5 7 P-Impedance
More informationThe elastic properties such as velocity, density, impedance,
SPECIAL SECTION: Rr ock Physics physics Lithology and fluid differentiation using rock physics template XIN-GANG CHI AND DE-HUA HAN, University of Houston The elastic properties such as velocity, density,
More informationShaly Sand Rock Physics Analysis and Seismic Inversion Implication
Shaly Sand Rock Physics Analysis and Seismic Inversion Implication Adi Widyantoro (IkonScience), Matthew Saul (IkonScience/UWA) Rock physics analysis of reservoir elastic properties often assumes homogeneity
More informationSections Rock Physics Seminar Alejandra Rojas
Sections 1.1 1.3 Rock Physics Seminar Alejandra Rojas February 6 th, 2009 Outline Introduction Velocity Porosity relations for mapping porosity and facies Fluid substitution analysis 1.1 Introduction Discovering
More informationTHE ROCK PHYSICS HANDBOOK
THE ROCK PHYSICS HANDBOOK TOOLS FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS IN POROUS MEDIA Gary Mavko Tapan Mukerji Jack Dvorkin Stanford University Stanford University Stanford University CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS
More informationA look into Gassmann s Equation
A look into Gassmann s Equation Nawras Al-Khateb, CHORUS Heavy Oil Consortium, Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary nawras.alkhateb@ucalgary.ca Summary By describing the influence of the pore
More informationDownloaded 08/30/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at
Modeling the effect of pores and cracks interactions on the effective elastic properties of fractured porous rocks Luanxiao Zhao*, De-hua Han, Qiuliang Yao and Fuyong Yan, University of Houston; Mosab
More informationSeismic reservoir and source-rock analysis using inverse rock-physics modeling: A Norwegian Sea demonstration
66 Seismic reservoir and source-rock analysis using inverse rock-physics modeling: A Norwegian Sea demonstration Kenneth Bredesen 1, Erling Hugo Jensen 1, 2, Tor Arne Johansen 1, 2, and Per Avseth 3, 4
More informationA shale rock physics model for analysis of brittleness index, mineralogy, and porosity in the Barnett Shale
1 2 A shale rock physics model for analysis of brittleness index, mineralogy, and porosity in the Barnett Shale 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Zhiqi Guo 1, Xiang-Yang Li 2,3, Cai Liu 1, Xuan Feng 1, and Ye Shen 4 1 Jilin
More informationRock Physics Perturbational Modeling: Carbonate case study, an intracratonic basin Northwest/Saharan Africa
Rock Physics Perturbational Modeling: Carbonate case study, an intracratonic basin Northwest/Saharan Africa Franklin Ruiz, Carlos Cobos, Marcelo Benabentos, Beatriz Chacon, and Roberto Varade, Luis Gairifo,
More informationCalibration of the petro-elastic model (PEM) for 4D seismic studies in multi-mineral rocks Amini, Hamed; Alvarez, Erick Raciel
Heriot-Watt University Heriot-Watt University Research Gateway Calibration of the petro-elastic model (PEM) for 4D seismic studies in multi-mineral rocks Amini, Hamed; Alvarez, Erick Raciel DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20132136
More informationEffects of Fracture Parameters in an Anisotropy Model on P-Wave Azimuthal Amplitude Responses
PROC. ITB Eng. Science Vol. 38 B, No. 2, 2006, 159-170 159 Effects of Fracture Parameters in an Anisotropy Model on P-Wave Azimuthal Amplitude Responses Fatkhan Program Studi Teknik Geofisika FIKTM-ITB
More informationCHARACTERIZATION OF SATURATED POROUS ROCKS WITH OBLIQUELY DIPPING FRACTURES. Jiao Xue and Robert H. Tatham
CHARACTERIZATION OF SATURATED POROUS ROCS WITH OBLIQUELY DIPPING FRACTURES Jiao Xue and Robert H. Tatham Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin ABSTRACT Elastic properties,
More informationReservoir Characteristics of a Quaternary Channel: Incorporating Rock Physics in Seismic and DC Resistivity Surveys
Reservoir Characteristics of a Quaternary Channel: Incorporating Rock Physics in Seismic and DC Resistivity Surveys Jawwad Ahmad* University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada jahmad@phys.ualberta.ca
More informationRock Physics Modeling in Montney Tight Gas Play
Rock Physics Modeling in Montney Tight Gas Play Ayato Kato 1, Kunio Akihisa 1, Carl Wang 2 and Reona Masui 3 1 JOGMEC-TRC, Chiba, Japan, kato-ayato@jogmec.go.jp 2 Encana, Calgary, Alberta 3 Mitsubishi
More informationIntegrating rock physics and full elastic modeling for reservoir characterization Mosab Nasser and John B. Sinton*, Maersk Oil Houston Inc.
Integrating rock physics and full elastic modeling for reservoir characterization Mosab Nasser and John B. Sinton*, Maersk Oil Houston Inc. Summary Rock physics establishes the link between reservoir properties,
More informationGeomechanics, Anisotropy and LMR
Geomechanics, Anisotropy and LMR Marco Perez *, Apache Canada Ltd, Calgary, AB, Canada marco.perez@apachecorp.com Bill Goodway, Apache Canada Ltd, Calgary, AB, Canada bill.goodway@apachecorp.com David
More informationGRAIN SORTING, POROSITY, AND ELASTICITY. Jack Dvorkin and Mario A. Gutierrez Geophysics Department, Stanford University ABSTRACT
GRAIN SORTING, POROSITY, AND ELASTICITY Jack Dvorkin and Mario A. Gutierrez Geophysics Department, Stanford University July 24, 2001 ABSTRACT Grain size distribution (sorting) is determined by deposition.
More informationMcMAT 2007 Micromechanics of Materials Austin, Texas, June 3 7, 2007
McMAT 2007 Micromechanics of Materials Austin, Texas, June 3 7, 2007 RANDOM POLYCRYSTALS OF GRAINS WITH CRACKS: MODEL OF ELASTIC BEHAVIOR FOR FRACTURED SYSTEMS James G. Berryman Earth Sciences Division
More informationIntegration of Rock Physics Models in a Geostatistical Seismic Inversion for Reservoir Rock Properties
Integration of Rock Physics Models in a Geostatistical Seismic Inversion for Reservoir Rock Properties Amaro C. 1 Abstract: The main goal of reservoir modeling and characterization is the inference of
More informationRock Physics Interpretation of microstructure Chapter Jingqiu Huang M.S. Candidate University of Houston
Rock Physics Interpretation of microstructure Chapter2.1 2.2 2.3 Jingqiu Huang M.S. Candidate University of Houston Introduction Theory and models Example in North Sea Introduction Theoretical models Inclusion
More informationPressure and Compaction in the Rock Physics Space. Jack Dvorkin
Pressure and Compaction in the Rock Physics Space Jack Dvorkin June 2002 0 200 Compaction of Shales Freshly deposited shales and clays may have enormous porosity of ~ 80%. The speed of sound is close to
More informationUncertainties in rock pore compressibility and effects on time lapse seismic modeling An application to Norne field
Uncertainties in rock pore compressibility and effects on time lapse seismic modeling An application to Norne field Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji Department of Energy Resources Engineering Stanford University
More informationFrom loose grains to stiff rocks The rock-physics "life story" of a clastic sediment, and its significance in QI studies
From loose grains to stiff rocks The rock-physics "life story" of a clastic sediment, and its significance in QI studies Prof. Per Avseth, NTNU/G&G Resources Burial depth/temp. Elastic Modulus The rock
More informationResearcher 2015;7(9)
4D Seismic Feasibility Study using well Logs in Sienna gas Field, West Delta Deep Marine concession, Egypt Helal, A., Shebl, A. 1, ElNaggar, S. 2 and Ezzat, A. 3 1 Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University,
More information6298 Stress induced azimuthally anisotropic reservoir - AVO modeling
6298 Stress induced azimuthally anisotropic reservoir - AVO modeling M. Brajanovski* (Curtin University of Technology), B. Gurevich (Curtin University of Technology), D. Nadri (CSIRO) & M. Urosevic (Curtin
More informationRock Physics of Shales and Source Rocks. Gary Mavko Professor of Geophysics Director, Stanford Rock Physics Project
Rock Physics of Shales and Source Rocks Gary Mavko Professor of Geophysics Director, Stanford Rock Physics Project 1 First Question: What is Shale? Shale -- a rock composed of mud-sized particles, such
More informationWe apply a rock physics analysis to well log data from the North-East Gulf of Mexico
Rock Physics for Fluid and Porosity Mapping in NE GoM JACK DVORKIN, Stanford University and Rock Solid Images TIM FASNACHT, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation RICHARD UDEN, MAGGIE SMITH, NAUM DERZHI, AND JOEL
More informationVELOCITY MODELING TO DETERMINE PORE ASPECT RATIOS OF THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE. Kwon Taek Oh
VELOCITY MODELING TO DETERMINE PORE ASPECT RATIOS OF THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE. Kwon Taek Oh Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin ABSTRACT This work estimates pore shapes from
More informationEffects of fluid changes on seismic reflections: Predicting amplitudes at gas reservoir directly from amplitudes at wet reservoir
GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 77, NO. 4 (JULY-AUGUST 2012); P. D129 D140, 15 FIGS., 2 TABLES. 10.1190/GEO2011-0331.1 Effects of fluid changes on seismic reflections: Predicting amplitudes at gas reservoir directly
More informationStress-induced transverse isotropy in rocks
Stanford Exploration Project, Report 80, May 15, 2001, pages 1 318 Stress-induced transverse isotropy in rocks Lawrence M. Schwartz, 1 William F. Murphy, III, 1 and James G. Berryman 1 ABSTRACT The application
More informationRock physics and AVO analysis for lithofacies and pore fluid prediction in a North Sea oil field
Rock physics and AVO analysis for lithofacies and pore fluid prediction in a North Sea oil field Downloaded 09/12/14 to 84.215.159.82. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use
More informationGeophysical and geomechanical rock property templates for source rocks Malleswar Yenugu, Ikon Science Americas, USA
Malleswar Yenugu, Ikon Science Americas, USA Summary Sweet spot identification for source rocks involve detection of organic rich, high porous facies combined with brittleness, which is prone for hydraulic
More informationConstraining seismic rock-property logs in organic shale reservoirs
Constraining seismic rock-property logs in organic shale reservoirs Malleswar Yenugu 1 and Lev Vernik 2 Abstract One of the major challenges of unconventional shale reservoirs is to understand the effects
More informationRock physics of a gas hydrate reservoir. Gas hydrates are solids composed of a hydrogen-bonded ROUND TABLE
ROUND TABLE Rock physics of a gas hydrate reservoir JACK DVORKIN and AMOS NUR, Stanford University, California, U.S. RICHARD UDEN and TURHAN TANER, Rock Solid Images, Houston, Texas, U.S. Gas hydrates
More informationAn empirical method for estimation of anisotropic parameters in clastic rocks
An empirical method for estimation of anisotropic parameters in clastic rocks YONGYI LI, Paradigm Geophysical, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Clastic sediments, particularly shale, exhibit transverse isotropic
More informationP314 Anisotropic Elastic Modelling for Organic Shales
P314 Anisotropic Elastic Modelling for Organic Shales X. Wu* (British Geological Survey), M. Chapman (British Geological Survey), X.Y. Li (British Geological Survey) & H. Dai (British Geological Survey)
More informationDownloaded 11/02/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at Summary.
in thin sand reservoirs William Marin* and Paola Vera de Newton, Rock Solid Images, and Mario Di Luca, Pacific Exploración y Producción. Summary Rock Physics Templates (RPTs) are useful tools for well
More informationLINK BETWEEN ATTENUATION AND VELOCITY DISPERSION
LINK BETWEEN ATTENUATION AND VELOCITY DISPERSION Jack Dvorkin Stanford University and Rock Solid Images April 25, 2005 SUMMARY In a viscoelastic sample, the causality principle links the attenuation of
More informationTu P8 08 Modified Anisotropic Walton Model for Consolidated Siliciclastic Rocks: Case Study of Velocity Anisotropy Modelling in a Barents Sea Well
Tu P8 08 Modified Anisotropic Walton Model for Consolidated Siliciclastic Rocks: Case Study of Velocity Anisotropy Modelling in a Barents Sea Well Y. Zhou (Rock Solid Images), F. Ruiz (Repsol), M. Ellis*
More informationTheoretical Approach in Vp/Vs Prediction from Rock Conductivity in Gas Saturating Shaly Sand
Modern Applied Science; Vol. 13, No. 1; 2019 ISSN 1913-1844 E-ISSN 1913-1852 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Theoretical Approach in Vp/Vs Prediction from Rock Conductivity in Gas
More informationTh LHR2 08 Towards an Effective Petroelastic Model for Simulator to Seismic Studies
Th LHR2 08 Towards an Effective Petroelastic Model for Simulator to Seismic Studies A. Briceno* (Heriot-Watt University), C. MacBeth (Heriot-Watt University) & M.D. Mangriotis (Heriot-Watt University)
More informationShear Wave Velocity Estimation Utilizing Wireline Logs for a Carbonate Reservoir, South-West Iran
Iranian Int. J. Sci. 4(2), 2003, p. 209-221 Shear Wave Velocity Estimation Utilizing Wireline Logs for a Carbonate Reservoir, South-West Iran Eskandari, H. 1, Rezaee, M.R., 2 Javaherian, A., 3 and Mohammadnia,
More informationEstimating the hydrocarbon volume from elastic and resistivity data: A concept
INTERPRETER S CORNER Coordinated by Rebecca B. Latimer Estimating the hydrocarbon volume from elastic and resistivity data: A concept CARMEN T. GOMEZ, JACK DVORKIN, and GARY MAVKO, Stanford University,
More informationSummary. Simple model for kerogen maturity (Carcione, 2000)
Malleswar Yenugu* and De-hua Han, University of Houston, USA Summary The conversion of kerogen to oil/gas will build up overpressure. Overpressure is caused by conversion of solid kerogen to fluid hydrocarbons
More informationEffects of VTI Anisotropy in Shale-Gas Reservoir Characterization
P-014 Summary Effects of VTI Anisotropy in Shale-Gas Reservoir Characterization Niranjan Banik* and Mark Egan, WesternGeco Shale reservoirs are one of the hottest plays in the oil industry today. Our understanding
More informationVelocity-porosity relationships, 1: Accurate velocity model for clean consolidated sandstones
GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 68, NO. 6 (NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2003); P. 1822 1834, 16 FIGS., 1 TABLE. 10.1190/1.1635035 Velocity-porosity relationships, 1: Accurate velocity model for clean consolidated sandstones Mark
More informationCrosswell tomography imaging of the permeability structure within a sandstone oil field.
Crosswell tomography imaging of the permeability structure within a sandstone oil field. Tokuo Yamamoto (1), and Junichi Sakakibara (2) (1) University of Miami and Yamamoto Engineering Corporation, (2)
More informationP- and S-Wave Velocity Measurements and Pressure Sensitivity Analysis of AVA Response
P- and S-Wave Velocity Measurements and Pressure Sensitivity Analysis of AVA Response Tiewei He* University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada tieweihe@phys.ualberta.ca and Douglas Schmitt University
More informationHydrogeophysics - Seismics
Hydrogeophysics - Seismics Matthias Zillmer EOST-ULP p. 1 Table of contents SH polarized shear waves: Seismic source Case study: porosity of an aquifer Seismic velocities for porous media: The Frenkel-Biot-Gassmann
More informationUnderstanding hydraulic fracture variability through a penny shaped crack model for pre-rupture faults
Penny shaped crack model for pre-rupture faults Understanding hydraulic fracture variability through a penny shaped crack model for pre-rupture faults David Cho, Gary F. Margrave, Shawn Maxwell and Mark
More informationManuscript received by the Editor 18 December 2007; revised manuscript received 11April 2008; published online 18 November 2008.
GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 73, NO. 6 NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2008; P. E197 E209, 9 FIGS. 10.1190/1.2985821 Rock physics modeling of unconsolidated sands: Accounting for nonuniform contacts and heterogeneous stress fields
More informationTowards Interactive QI Workflows Laurie Weston Bellman*
Laurie Weston Bellman* Summary Quantitative interpretation (QI) is an analysis approach that is widely applied (Aki and Richards, 1980, Verm and Hilterman, 1995, Avseth et al., 2005, Weston Bellman and
More informationThe effects of seismic anisotropy and upscaling on rock physics interpretation and AVO analysis
The effects of seismic anisotropy and upscaling on rock physics interpretation and AVO analysis Mayowa Adeleye Petroleum Geosciences Submission date: June 2015 Supervisor: Alexey Stovas, IPT Co-supervisor:
More informationRock physics and AVO applications in gas hydrate exploration
Rock physics and AVO applications in gas hydrate exploration ABSTRACT Yong Xu*, Satinder Chopra Core Lab Reservoir Technologies Division, 301,400-3rd Ave SW, Calgary, AB, T2P 4H2 yxu@corelab.ca Summary
More informationGeophysical and geomechanical rock property templates for source rocks Malleswar Yenugu, Ikon Science Americas, USA
Geophysical and geomechanical rock property templates for source rocks Malleswar Yenugu, Ikon Science Americas, USA Summary Sweet spot identification for source rocks involve detection of organic rich,
More informationIntegrating rock physics modeling, prestack inversion and Bayesian classification. Brian Russell
Integrating rock physics modeling, prestack inversion and Bayesian classification Brian Russell Introduction Today, most geoscientists have an array of tools available to perform seismic reservoir characterization.
More informationAVO Crossplotting II: Examining Vp/Vs Behavior
AVO Crossplotting II: Examining Vp/Vs Behavior Heath Pelletier* Talisman Energy, Calgary, AB hpelletier@talisman-energy.com Introduction The development of AVO crossplot analysis has been the subject of
More informationSENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF AMPLITUDE VARIATION WITH OFFSET (AVO) IN FRACTURED MEDIA
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF AMPLITUDE VARIATION WITH OFFSET AVO) IN FRACTURED MEDIA Mary L. Krasovec, William L. Rodi, and M. Nafi Toksoz Earth Resources Laboratory Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary
More informationIDENTIFYING PATCHY SATURATION FROM WELL LOGS Short Note. / K s. + K f., G Dry. = G / ρ, (2)
IDENTIFYING PATCHY SATURATION FROM WELL LOGS Short Note JACK DVORKIN, DAN MOOS, JAMES PACKWOOD, AND AMOS NUR DEPARTMENT OF GEOPHYSICS, STANFORD UNIVERSITY January 5, 2001 INTRODUCTION Gassmann's (1951)
More informationOn discriminating sand from shale using prestack inversion without wells: A proof of concept using well data as a surrogate for seismic amplitudes
SPECIAL Rock SECTION: physics R o c k p h y s i c s On discriminating sand from shale using prestack inversion without wells: A proof of concept using well data as a surrogate for seismic amplitudes M
More informationVelocity porosity relationships: Predictive velocity model for cemented sands composed of multiple mineral phases
Geophysical Prospecting,,, 9 7 Velocity porosity relationships: Predictive velocity model for cemented sands composed of multiple mineral phases Mark A. Knackstedt,, Christoph H. Arns and W. Val Pinczewski
More informationRock Physics of Organic Shale and Its Implication
Rock Physics of Organic Shale and Its Implication Lev Vernik, Marathon Oil Corporation, Houston, USA lvernik@marathonoil.com Yulia Khadeeva, Marathon Oil Corporation, Houston, USA Cris Tuttle, Marathon
More informationPractical Gassmann fluid substitution in sand/shale sequences
first break volume 25, December 2007 tutorial Practical Gassmann fluid substitution in sand/shale sequences Rob Simm * Introduction When performing fluid substitution on log data Gassmann s (1951) model
More informationRecent advances in application of AVO to carbonate reservoirs: case histories
Recent advances in application of AVO to reservoirs: case histories Yongyi Li, Bill Goodway*, and Jonathan Downton Core Lab Reservoir Technologies Division *EnCana Corporation Summary The application of
More informationDownloaded 11/20/12 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at
AVO crossplot analysis in unconsolidated sediments containing gas hydrate and free gas: Green Canyon 955, Gulf of Mexico Zijian Zhang* 1, Daniel R. McConnell 1, De-hua Han 2 1 Fugro GeoConsulting, Inc.,
More informationCorrelation of brittleness index with fractures and microstructure in the Barnett Shale
Correlation of brittleness index with fractures and microstructure in the Barnett Shale Z. Guo (British Geological Survey), M. Chapman (University of Edinburgh), X.Y. Li (British Geological Survey) SUMMARY
More informationMethane hydrate rock physics models for the Blake Outer Ridge
Stanford Exploration Project, Report 80, May 15, 2001, pages 1 307 Methane hydrate rock physics models for the Blake Outer Ridge Christine Ecker 1 ABSTRACT Seismic analyses of methane hydrate data from
More informationEstimation of shale reservoir properties based on anisotropic rock physics modelling
Estimation of shale reservoir properties based on anisotropic rock physics modelling K. Qian* (China University of Petroleum,Beijing), F. Zhang (China University of Petroleum,Beijing), X.Y. Li (British
More informationCharacterizing the effect of elastic interactions on the effective elastic properties of porous, cracked rocks
Geophysical Prospecting, 2015 doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.12243 Characterizing the effect of elastic interactions on the effective elastic properties of porous, cracked rocks Luanxiao Zhao 1,2, Qiuliang Yao
More informationSeismic characterization of Montney shale formation using Passey s approach
Seismic characterization of Montney shale formation using Passey s approach Ritesh Kumar Sharma*, Satinder Chopra and Amit Kumar Ray Arcis Seismic Solutions, Calgary Summary Seismic characterization of
More informationSearch and Discovery Article #42083 (2017)** Posted August 21, 2017
Geophysical Characterization of Carbonate Reservoirs Using Advanced Interpretation Techniques: Applications to Abenaki Formation, Penobscot Block, Nova Scotia* D. Coronel 1, E. Villamizar 1, E. Illidge
More informationDETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF ROCK PHYSICS PROPERTIES FOR IMPROVED HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN HYDROCARBON-BEARING SHALE
DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF ROCK PHYSICS PROPERTIES FOR IMPROVED HYDRAULIC FRACTURING IN HYDROCARBON-BEARING SHALE Antoine Montaut, Paul Sayar, and Carlos Torres-Verdín The University of Texas at Austin
More informationBPM37 Linking Basin Modeling with Seismic Attributes through Rock Physics
BPM37 Linking Basin Modeling with Seismic Attributes through Rock Physics W. AlKawai* (Stanford University), T. Mukerji (Stanford University) & S. Graham (Stanford University) SUMMARY In this study, we
More informationGeophysical model response in a shale gas
Geophysical model response in a shale gas Dhananjay Kumar and G. Michael Hoversten Chevron USA Inc. Abstract Shale gas is an important asset now. The production from unconventional reservoir like shale
More informationIntegrating reservoir flow simulation with time-lapse seismic inversion in a heavy oil case study
Integrating reservoir flow simulation with time-lapse seismic inversion in a heavy oil case study Naimeh Riazi*, Larry Lines*, and Brian Russell** Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary **Hampson-Russell
More informationCHARACTERIZING RESERVOIR PROPERTIES OF THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE USING THE SELF-CONSISTENT MODEL AND A GRID SEARCH METHOD.
CHARACTERIZING RESERVOIR PROPERTIES OF THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE USING THE SELF-CONSISTENT MODEL AND A GRID SEARCH METHOD Meijuan Jiang Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin ABSTRACT
More informationUnconventional reservoir characterization using conventional tools
Ritesh K. Sharma* and Satinder Chopra Arcis Seismic Solutions, TGS, Calgary, Canada Summary Shale resources characterization has gained attention in the last decade or so, after the Mississippian Barnett
More informationMeasurement of elastic properties of kerogen Fuyong Yan, De-hua Han*, Rock Physics Lab, University of Houston
Measurement of elastic properties of kerogen Fuyong Yan, De-hua Han*, Rock Physics Lab, University of Houston Summary To have good understanding of elastic properties of organic shale, it is fundamental
More informationP235 Modelling Anisotropy for Improved Velocities, Synthetics and Well Ties
P235 Modelling Anisotropy for Improved Velocities, Synthetics and Well Ties P.W. Wild* (Ikon Science Ltd), M. Kemper (Ikon Science Ltd), L. Lu (Ikon Science Ltd) & C.D. MacBeth (Heriot Watt University)
More informationAVAZ and VVAZ practical analysis to estimate anisotropic properties
AVAZ and VVAZ practical analysis to estimate anisotropic properties Yexin Liu*, SoftMirrors Ltd., Calgary, Alberta, Canada yexinliu@softmirrors.com Summary Seismic anisotropic properties, such as orientation
More informationFluid-property discrimination with AVO: A Biot-Gassmann perspective
Fluid-property discrimination with AVO: A Biot-Gassmann perspective Brian H. Russell, Ken Hedlin 1, Fred J. Hilterman, and Laurence R. Lines ABSTRACT This paper draws together basic rock physics, AVO,
More informationKeywords. Unconsolidated Sands, Seismic Amplitude, Oil API
Role of Seismic Amplitude in Assessment of Oil API Ravi Mishra*(Essar Oil Ltd.), Baban Jee (Essar Oil Ltd.), Ashish Kumar (Essar Oil Ltd.) Email: ravimishragp@gmail.com Keywords Unconsolidated Sands, Seismic
More information4D stress sensitivity of dry rock frame moduli: constraints from geomechanical integration
Title 4D stress sensitivity of dry rock frame moduli: constraints from geomechanical integration Authors Bloomer, D., Ikon Science Asia Pacific Reynolds, S., Ikon Science Asia Pacific Pavlova, M., Origin
More informationA New AVO Attribute for Hydrocarbon Prediction and Application to the Marmousi II Dataset*
A New AVO Attribute for Hydrocarbon Prediction and Application to the Marmousi II Dataset* Changcheng Liu 1 and Prasad Ghosh 2 Search and Discovery Article #41764 (2016) Posted January 25, 2016 *Adapted
More informationPre-Stack Seismic Inversion and Amplitude Versus Angle Modeling Reduces the Risk in Hydrocarbon Prospect Evaluation
Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development Vol. 7, No. 2, 2014, pp. 30-39 DOI:10.3968/5170 ISSN 1925-542X [Print] ISSN 1925-5438 [Online] www.cscanada.net www.cscanada.org Pre-Stack Seismic Inversion
More informationRole of Data Analysis in fixing parameters for petrophysics & rockphysics modeling for effective seismic reservoir characterization A case study
10 th Biennial International Conference & Exposition P 145 Role of Data Analysis in fixing parameters for petrophysics & rockphysics modeling for effective seismic reservoir characterization A case study
More informationInternational Journal of Solids and Structures
International Journal of Solids and Structures 48 (0) 680 686 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Solids and Structures journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijsolstr
More informationLinearized AVO and Poroelasticity for HRS9. Brian Russell, Dan Hampson and David Gray 2011
Linearized AO and oroelasticity for HR9 Brian Russell, Dan Hampson and David Gray 0 Introduction In this talk, we combine the linearized Amplitude ariations with Offset (AO) technique with the Biot-Gassmann
More informationQuantitative interpretation using inverse rock-physics modeling on AVO data
Quantitative interpretation using inverse rock-physics modeling on AVO data Erling Hugo Jensen 1, Tor Arne Johansen 2, 3, 4, Per Avseth 5, 6, and Kenneth Bredesen 2, 7 Downloaded 08/16/16 to 129.177.32.62.
More informationAn overview of AVO and inversion
P-486 An overview of AVO and inversion Brian Russell, Hampson-Russell, CGGVeritas Company Summary The Amplitude Variations with Offset (AVO) technique has grown to include a multitude of sub-techniques,
More informationSEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting
On the applicability of Gassmann model in carbonates Ravi Sharma*, Manika Prasad and Ganpat Surve (Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay), G C Katiyar (Third Eye Centre, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation
More informationSUMMARY INTRODUCTION EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
Frequency dependent elastic properties and attenuation in heavy-oil sands: comparison between measured and modeled data Agnibha Das, and Michael Batzle, Colorado School of Mines SUMMARY We have measured
More informationStrength, creep and frictional properties of gas shale reservoir rocks
ARMA 1-463 Strength, creep and frictional properties of gas shale reservoir rocks Sone, H. and Zoback, M. D. Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA Copyright 21 ARMA, American Rock Mechanics Association
More informationEstimating Permeability from Acoustic Velocity and Formation Resistivity Factor
5th Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, Hyderabad-2004, India PP 582-587 and Formation Resistivity Factor Majid Nabi-Bidhendi Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6466,
More informationThe Weyburn Field in southeastern Saskatchewan,
SPECIAL 2 SECTION: C O 2 AVO modeling of pressure-saturation effects in Weyburn sequestration JINFENG MA, State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, China IGOR MOROZOV, University
More information