Marine EM, the Past, the Present, and the Future. Steven Constable Scripps Institution of Oceanography
|
|
- Augusta Webb
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Marine EM, the Past, the Present, and the Future Steven Constable Scripps Institution of Oceanography
2 Acknowledgements SEG and SEG Foundation Sponsored by Statoil Sponsored by Paradigm Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Seafloor Electromagnetic Methods Consortium
3 SEG Membership Benefits SEG Digital Library full text articles Technical Journals in Print and Online Join Today! Networking Opportunities Membership Discounts on! Continuing Education Training Courses! Publications (35% off list price)! Workshops and Meetings Membership materials are available today! Join Online at seg.org/about-seg/membership
4 Student Opportunities Sponsored Membership Student Chapter Programs SEG/Chevron Student Leadership Symposium SEG/ExxonMobil Student Education Program Challenge Bowl Scholarships Field Camp Grants Geoscientists Without Borders Student Expos & IGSCs Honorary and Distinguished Lecturers SEG Online Learn more at seg.org/education/students-early-career
5 Section/Associated Society Opportunities Host DL, HL, and DISC Programs Council Representation Annual Meeting Booth Discount Best Papers presented at SEG Annual Meetings Joint Conferences, Workshops, and Forums in partnership with SEG For more information, including a list of benefits, please visit:
6 Marine EM, the Past, the Present, and the Future Steven Constable Scripps Institution of Oceanography
7 On Tuesday 17th August, 2004 the front page of the Wall Street Journal had a lead article about a new geophysical technique. Marine CSEM was suddenly in the news
8 On Tuesday 17th August, 2004 the front page of the Wall Street Journal had a lead article about a new geophysical technique. Marine CSEM was suddenly in the news except is wasn t new. Over 23 years earlier an oceanographer called Charles Cox had suggested marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration
9 On Tuesday 17th August, 2004 the front page of the Wall Street Journal had a lead article about a new geophysical technique. Marine CSEM was suddenly in the news except is wasn t new. Over 23 years earlier an oceanographer called Charles Cox had proposed using marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration to Exxon.
10 Outline: Basics of the EM methods Early history of marine EM Commercialization 10 things you need to know The future
11 What is CSEM? Controlled Source ElectroMagnetic sounding has been used since the 1930 s to map sub-surface geology through the proxy of electrical conductivity. On land it is mainly used for mining exploration (shallower, conductive ore bodies), but has been used for map geological structure for oil exploration. Transmitters Receivers Bz I grounded wire (E) By Bx I horizontal loop (B) Ex V Ey V
12 What is MT? CSEM is related to another EM technique called MagnetoTelluric (MT) sounding, which uses similar receivers to measure Earth s natural magnetic field variations and the induced electric currents. MT signals are either part of a useful complementary method or a source of noise for CSEM. Natural-source Magnetotelluric fields Transmitters Receivers Bz I grounded wire (E) By Bx I horizontal loop (B) Ex V Ey V
13 Both can be used in the marine environment: Marine CSEM more sensitive to resistive rocks Marine MT more sensitive to conductive rocks But both methods can detect contrasts Air (resistive) Natural-source Magnetotelluric fields CSEM Transmitter Seawater (very conductive) m dipole, amps m Oil, Gas (resistive) Seafloor (variable conductivity) Electric and magnetic field recorders Salt, carbonate, volcanics (resistive)
14 Both MT and CSEM sounding use electromagnetic induction, which describes what happens around a time-varying primary magnetic field: primary magnetic field
15 Faraday s Law says that a time varying (or moving) magnetic field will induce electric fields: E dl = d C dt ( is magnetic flux). primary magnetic field electric field
16 Faraday s Law says that a time varying (or moving) magnetic field will induce electric fields: C E dl = d dt ( is magnetic flux). primary magnetic field electric field and current Ohm s Law says that E will generate a current J in a conductor: J = E
17 Faraday s Law says that a time varying (or moving) magnetic field will induce electric fields: C E dl = d dt ( is magnetic flux). Ohm s Law says that E will generate a current J in a conductor: J = E Ampere s Law says that the current will generate a secondary magnetic field: primary magnetic field secondary magnetic field electric field and current C B dl = µi
18 The secondary field opposes the changes in the primary field. The consequence of this is that conductive rocks absorb variations in EM fields more than resistive rocks. Depth > Half-space
19 The secondary field opposes the changes in the primary field. The consequence of this is that conductive rocks absorb variations in EM fields more than resistive rocks. This absorption is exponential: E(z) =E o e z/z s The rate of absorption is given by the skin depth, which depends on rock resistivity and period: Depth > High resistivity, long periods = large skin depths, greater penetration. Low resistivity, short periods = small skin depths, greater attenuation. Half-space
20 CRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY UCSD Secondary fields are different in amplitude, phase, and direction than the primary magnetic and electric fields. Electric fields can also be distorted galvanically, as in DC resistivity methods. Secondary fields Primary fields Induced magnetic fields Galvanic distortion of electric currents
21 MT and CSEM are methods to measure electrical conductivity. Conductivity varies over 5 orders of magnitude in common Earth materials, and provides the ideal mechanism for studying fluids, water, and geology, including hydrocarbons. Conductivity, S/m water 20 C 0 C seawater fresh water sediments mantle marine lower mantle land 1400 C 1200 C peridotite 1100 C basalt, salt, carbonates basaltic melt 10% 3% 1% partial melt ice, hydrate hydrocarbons Resistivity, Ωm 100 1,000 10,000
22 The Past
23 Interestingly, Cagniard proposed adaption to the marine environment in the 1953 paper that first presented the MT method. GEOPHYSICS, VOL 18, NO. 3 (JULY 1953), P
24 Charles (Chip) Cox and Jean Filloux of Scripps Institution of Oceanography made the first marine MT measurements in 1965, in 4300 m water offshore California. Charles Cox Tucson mag Jean Filloux seafloor mag Tucson mag seafloor E Cox, Filloux, and Larsen, 1968
25 Theory pre-dates practice, but even so marine CSEM is a young field. The earliest marine CSEM work was carried out by the British and US navies. This 1968 paper out of the US Navy Underwater Sound Lab appears to be the first proposal for marine CSEM as we now know it.
26 The same Chip Cox ( ) developed practical deepwater CSEM in the early 1980 s, partly under funding by DARPA to improve understanding of seafloor communications, and ONR for submarine noise studies.
27 In 1979 Chip carried out an experiment in nearly 3,000m water with transmissions of 80 amps on an 800 m antenna. Frequencies of Hz were detected 19 km away. His target was a mid-ocean ridge. Tow cable Transmitter Antenna Receiver Electrodes Young and Cox, 1981 Cox et al, 1981
28 Remarkably, within 2 years, in March 1981, Chip proposed the CSEM method for oil exploration to Exxon:
29 In the proposal, Chip explicitly described the direct detection of a hydrocarbon reservoir. Fields measured 2500 m from a 10 4 Am CSEM transmitter
30 I checked Chip s calculations and they are basically correct. However, the proposal was declined - Chip was too far ahead of the times Amplitude (nv/m) Hz Fields measured 2500 m from a 10 4 Am CSEM transmitter
31 Meanwhile, in the late 1980 s Martin Sinha of Cambridge (later Southampton) developed a UK CSEM capability based on Scripps, but with an flown transmitter capable of working over mid-ocean ridges. (From Sinha et al, 1990)
32 1 km 2 km thin resistive layer overhang Current industry funding for marine EM started in 1995 in order to develop MT imaging of salt in the Gulf of Mexico. Clearly, the price of oil was not a factor (adjusted for inflation, 1998 was the lowest price in history). 4 km 6 km SW NW Resistive (4 Ohm-m) Conductive (0.3 Ohm-m) What drove interest in such an expensive, nonseismic method?
33 m 1k overhang thin resistive layer m km 2k 6 km 4 SW Resistive (4 Ohm-m) NW Conductive (0.3 Ohm-m) Current industry funding for marine EM started in 1995 in order to develop MT imaging of salt in the Gulf of Mexico. Clearly, the price of oil was not a factor (adjusted for inflation, 1998 was the lowest price in history). What drove interest in such an expensive, nonseismic method? First, the seismic method was having great difficultly imaging beneath salt
34 1 km 2 km thin resistive layer overhang Current industry funding for marine EM started in 1995 in order to develop MT imaging of salt in the Gulf of Mexico. Clearly, the price of oil was not a factor (adjusted for inflation, 1998 was the lowest price in history). 4 km 6 km SW NW Resistive (4 Ohm-m) Conductive (0.3 Ohm-m) What drove interest in such an expensive, nonseismic method? But probably the biggest factor was the development of the tension leg platform, which enabled production of oil and gas from deepwater prospects but deepwater drilling is very expensive.
35 Wells drilled Oil price, nominal $ Gulf of Mexico, wells >1,000 m water depth and oil price Wells; Oil price First Scripps industry funding starts First Scripps industry funding stops Current industry funding starts Year First oilfield CSEM surveys, Angola Commercial marine MT was offered starting in The first oilfield CSEM tests were done in late early 2002, by Statoil and ExxonMobil. They both used Scripps receivers and the Southampton transmitter. Again, the driver was the high cost of drilling combined with limitations in the seismic method.
36 The seismic method has the problem that small gas saturations produce big velocity changes. Seawater/gas in 50% porous sandstone 1.6 Archie s with fizz-gas P-wave velocity, km/s Velocity Fizz-gas Gas saturation
37 However, electrical resistivity does not change until the gas saturation gets large. This means that marine CSEM can be used to assess targets prior to drilling. Seawater/gas in 50% porous sandstone Archie s with fizz-gas P-wave velocity, km/s Velocity Fizz-gas Least resistivity contrast easily detected with EM Archie s Resistivity, Ωm, log scale HS lower bound Gas saturation
38 Oil and gas reservoirs are too thin to be sensed with MT - now we need to use a man-made source of energy. Again, EM energy propagates best through the more resistive rocks. In this movie, the electric fields are absorbed more rapidly in seawater: Air Sea Sediment movie Kerry Key, SIO.
39 CRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY UCSD If we add a thin resistive layer to the model (an oil or gas reservoir?), then energy propagates even better through this layer than the surrounding sediments. Then we add a transmitter and receivers to actually collect these data. Air Sea Oil layer Sediment movie Kerry Key, SIO.
40 The effect can be up to an order of magnitude for a large oil or gas reservoir. This is what I call the canonical model, and is similar to the target chosen by Statoil for the first test of the marine CSEM method, and very similar to the model that Chip used in his proposal. In-line electric field, V/m/(Am) E-field amplitudes larger over hydrocarbon reservoirs no oil, gas 1000 m, 0.3 Ωm 1000 m, 1 Ωm 100 m, 100 Ωm oil, gas Source-receiver offset, km
41 Statoil s tests were made in November 2000 over the Girasoll oil field off Angola: tow A Distance North, (km) Radial Electric Field, (V/m)/(source dipole moment) Infinite Reservoir Oil Reservoir No Reservoir Terminating Reservoir V approximate extent of reservoir Distance East (km) N Source-Receiver Offset, m Constable and Srnka,
42 Similar studies were carried out by ExxonMobil in Jan 2002, also off Angola. These studies used 30 new instruments designed and built by Scripps for ExxonMobil, operated by AOA Geophysics. Distance (km) receiver 21 Salt 3 seismic O/W contact 6 Well B 9 Distance (km) Over a known discovery Well A tow Normalized field (V/(Am 2) ) Prior to drilling noise level reservoir limits Distance along line (km) Inline E Field, 0.25 Hz Receiver 21, Tow Line 2 2 min. Stacked Data With Reservoir Backgound Distance North (km) Salt Oligocene tow 3 Salt Miocene well receiver 21 Radial Electric Field, (V/(Am 2 )) noise level Rotated Inline E Field Receiver 21, Tow Line Hz Data Mio + Olig HC Filled Oligocene HC Filled Brine Filled Distance (km) Distance East (km) Constable and Srnka, 2007
43 Then things got interesting... By the end of 2002 three contractors were formed to offer marine MT/CSEM as a commercial product. At least 3 main contractors offering marine EM data collection and interpretation services Several special-purpose ships have been built since then. Much based on early academic science and technology.
44 Since then more companies have joined the party
45 The Present 10 things you should know about marine CSEM that are not likely to change
46 1. EM does not map oil or gas, or even rock type. We cannot tell the difference between an evaporite, a basalt, or an oil sand based on resistivity alone. Resistivity of Rocks and Minerals (Data from Telford et al.) basalts/lavas limestones wet OIL SANDS clays sandstones, quartzites dry pyrrhotite graphite seawater evaporites groundwater intrusive igneous rocks wet dry quartz Log 10 (Resistivity, Ωm) Thus, to manage false positives you need additional data - seismics, geology, magnetics, gravity, Integration with other data sets is perhaps the only safe way to use marine EM data.
47 2. The resolution of EM induction is between wave propagation and potential fields: High frequency (megahertz) Radar Wave equation: Resolution ~ wavelength 2 E = µ E t + µ 2 E t 2 Seismics r u c 2 Mid frequency ( Hz) Inductive EM Diffusion equation: Resolution ~ size/depth 2 E = µ E t Zero frequency DC Resistivity Laplace equation: Resolution ~ bounds only 2 E =0 Gravity/ Magnetism r 2 U =0 µ = electrical conductivity ~ = magnetic permeability ~ S/m = electric permittivity ~ F/m H/m
48 3. Frequency is too low for wave propagation in rocks, but does constrain length scale through skin depth : z s At a single frequency 2 E = µ E becomes t 2 E = i µ E =2 f ( ) which for uniform fields has solutions of the form where we have defined a skin depth E(z) =E o e z/z s+i( t z/z s ) z s = 2/ µ For every skin depth the fields decay by 1/e (~37%) and phase lags by one radian (~57 ). In 1 Ωm sediments: frequency skin depth 0.1Hz 1,600 m 0.25 Hz 1,000 m 1.0 Hz 500 m 5.0 Hz 225 m
49 Although you need a low enough frequency to reach your target, sensitivity can increase with frequency (Eradial, 3,000 m, phase): degrees 3000m, E rad 0.25Hz degrees m, E rad 0.75Hz 150 Northing, km Hz Hz N = 623 rms = 4 90 N = 642 rms = m, E rad 1.75Hz degrees 280 degrees 3000m, E rad 3.25Hz Northing, km Hz Hz N = 602 rms = Easting, km 330 N = 348 rms = Easting, km 460 (But your signal size gets smaller.) These are data over the Scarborough gas field offshore NW Australia, collected by Scripps with support from BHP Billiton.
50 Multiple frequencies Single frequency Hz Single frequency Hz Single frequency Hz 1 y transmitter Constable, Orange, and Key, 2015 Depth (km) Good inversion technology is key to getting the most out of EM data, and inversions of multiple frequencies are much better than single frequency inversions Truth 1 Hz 0.1, 1Hz 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10 Hz Resistivity (ohm m) Key, 2009
51 With a single frequency and no phase data, a shallow resistor (say, hydrate) has an almost identical response to a deep hydrocarbon reservoir. This led to actual drilling errors. Reservoir Ey Shallow slab Receiver Reservoir 0.33 ohm-m Shallow slab 0.33 ohm-m 1 ohm-m 1 ohm-m Courtesy Arnold Orange
52 Northing, km Northing, km o 0 Azimuth Field purely radial (in-line geometry) Azimuth 4000m, E rad 0.75Hz, log 10 (V/Am 2 ) N = 690 rms = 10% m, E az 0.75Hz N = 297 rms = 9% Easting, km log 10 (V/Am 2 ) Receiver Transmitter fields have a dipole geometry. The radial (inline) and azimuthal 210 (broadside) fields behave differently. The greater vertical component 220 of the radial fields creates greater sensitivity to thin, 230 sub-horizontal resistors (reservoirs). You can use 12.8 this to tell thick from thin 240 resistors. The modes also behave differently to anisotropy m, E rad 0.75Hz N = 690 rms = 4 Radial field Er Eø Azimuthal field N = 297 rms = Easting, km 7805 Northing, km degrees 250 At intermediate degrees azimuths the m, E az 0.75Hz data are a trigonometric mixture of the 110 radial and azimuthal fields N = 690 rms = 10% Hz amplitude, 4km Tx-Rx offset 4000m, E az 0.75Hz 13 log 10 (V/Am 2 ) N = Transmitter o 90 Azimuth Field purely azimuthal (broadside geometry) N = 297 rms = 9% Easting, km N =
53 Inverting either inline Bx or Ey provides best resolution to reservoir targets. Note Ez: don t confuse sensitivity with resolution. x Crossline Tx x Inline Tx x Vertical Tx E B Bx B B E E Ez Ey y y y x transmitter y transmitter z transmitter Depth (km) Truth Ex By Bz Ex,By,Bz Depth (km) Truth Bx Ey Ez Bx,Ey,Ez Depth (km) Truth Bx Ey Ez Bx,Ey,Ez Resistivity (ohm m) Resistivity (ohm m) Resistivity (ohm m) 1D Inversions of synthetic 0.1 and 1.0 Hz data with 1% noise added: Key, 2009
54 CRIPPS INSTITUTION OF OCEANOGRAPHY UCSD 6. CSEM works best in deep water, where the air wave is small. But, it works OK in shallow water because the air wave and target response are coupled. Don t try to remove the air wave. 'Air wave' Seawater propagation host rock propagation target signal Flood From: Orange, Key and Constable, Geophysics, 2009 Orange, Key, and Constable, 2009
55 7. Depth sensitivity in CSEM is largely determined by geometry. Sensitivity is always greatest right below the Tx and Rx. Depth sensitivity is about half Rx-Tx spacing, and so is sensitivity to off-line structure. Plan 0.25 Hz and perturbation of 1 Ωm halfspace Section inline (m) Constable, 2010
56 Targets have to be bigger than their depth of burial to be detected (note that this has nothing to do with transmitter power!). -8 Radial mode fields (1 Hz) (3D calculation courtesy C. Weiss) -9 log10(e field magnitude, V/m/(Am)) km 2 km 3 km 1000 m, 1 Ωm 4 km 5 km diameter 100 m, 100 Ωm 1D layer D halfspace Range, m Constable and Weiss, 2006
57 8. Anisotropy is important. Aligned crystals and inter-bedding can produce anisotropy on microscopic to macroscopic scales. CSEM cannot tell micro- from macro-anisotropy until the layers get very thick. NR O Brien, J. Sed. Res
58 To a good approximation (10% or so), the anisotropic response follows the vertical resistivity for the radial mode, and the horizontal resistivity for the azimuthal mode. Inverting the modes separately using isotropic models may give reasonable results, but joint inversion of both modes will fail without anisotropy. 1 Ωm 0.5 Ωm Red - magnetic fields Blue - electric fields Constable, 2010 Anisotropic Horizontal Vertical -8-8 Amplitude (log 10 V/m/(Am), T/(Am)) Radial Bx: Anisotropy Ey: Anisotropy Bx: HS_half Ey: HS_half Bx: HS_one Ey: HS_one Amplitude (log 10 V/m/(Am), T/(Am)) Azimuthal By: Anisotropy Ex: Anisotropy By: HS_half Ex: HS_half By: HS_one Ex: HS_one -17 RADIAL: Frequency: 0.25 Hz Horizontal Range (km) -17 AZIMUTHAL: Frequency: 0.25 Hz Horizontal Range (km)
59 9. Seawater conductivity matters. Getting it wrong can introduce spurious structure into CSEM models (red = correct, black = 1-layer approximation). Expensive mistakes have been made Truth Free sea, 1 layer, rms 3.6 Fixed sea, 20 layers 1.5 Depth (km) Resistivit y (ohm m) Key, 2009
60 10. Like DC resistivity, CSEM is mainly sensitive to the resistivity-thickness product of thin resistive layers. This is called T-equivalence, where T = transverse resistance (i.e. resistivity times thickness) I V 100 m, 1 Ωm 10 m, 100 Ωm I V 100 m, 1 Ωm 1 m, 1000 Ωm Apparent Resistivity Electrode Spacing If resistivity is proportional to net pay, this may not be much of a problem.
61 The Future
62 Marine EM was almost certainly over-sold between 2002 and 2007 or so. WesternGeco pulled out of the marine EM business in 2010 and OHM was absorbed into EMGS in EM contractor share price The marine EM market was recently worth around $200m/year, or about 5% of the marine seismic market. Marine EM is a capital-intensive business and there is a persistent fear of patent lawsuits, so it is difficult for smaller, innovative companies to enter the market. On the other hand, there probably isn t enough profit for the big companies to care. But there is some progress.
63 PGS surface towed streamer system is providing good data in water depths up to 400 m or so, and allows data collection co-incident with 2D seismics. PGS website
64 Petromarker has a novel vertical-vertical system which can operate in deep water, but has limited lateral capabilities. Petromarker website
65 On the other hand, there is only one contractor offering the standard approach that works so well in deep water. EMGS website However, the custom vessel, large (3D) survey model has made CSEM a relatively expensive commodity.
66 Does it work? Jonny Hesthammer thinks so. False positives have been drilled (mostly lithological resistors), but false negatives are very rare. That is, without a CSEM signature the likelihood of a commercial discovery is very low - but industry just keeps drilling and providing more data for Jonny s plot - without more confidence in the method it is difficult to realize its value. Strong EM response (NAR>15%) Weak EM response (NAR<15%) Increasing EM signature % 300% 4 250% % 3 150% % 2 50% % 0.5 Ivory 32 mmboe Goliat 238 mmboe Havis 250 mmboe Wisting 132 mmboe Skrugard 286 mmboe Norvarg 189 mmboe Skavl 35 mmboe Hanssen mmboe Storbarden - Dry Salina 38 mmboe Eik - Dry Mercury 6-12 mmboe Atlantis Minor gas Apollo - Dry* Phoenix Dry* Breiflabb Heilo - Dry Mostly discoveries (76%) Mostly dry wells (68%) (2.9% commercial discovery rate) Discovery - Exploration Discovery - Calibration Discovery Unknown commerciality Discovery Non-commercial Dry well - Exploration Dry well - Calibration Wisting Alt. - Dry Darwin - Dry Byrkje - Dry Bønna - Dry Recent CSEM wells NAR=15% Hesthammer et al., First Break, 2012; Hesthammer pers. comm. 2015
67 Much of the CSEM data is collected by the majors (ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, etc.) and the large NOCs (Petrobras, Pemex, etc.). These companies keep their success rate statistics fairly confidential. But they are still collecting data I think the future lies in smaller, portable, ship-of-opportunity systems (like the ones academics must use), expanding the market to smaller client companies. This may take the passing of a few years and a rise in oil prices, but I think we can count on both of these. Thank you!
68 Connecting the world of applied geophysics
Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration
GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 75, NO. 5 SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2 ; P. 75A67 75A81, 15 FIGS..119/1.3483451 Ten years of marine CSEM for hydrocarbon exploration Steven Constable 1 ABSTRACT Marine controlled-source electromagnetic
More informationVertical and horizontal resolution considerations for a joint 3D CSEM and MT inversion
Antony PRICE*, Total E&P and Don WATTS, WesternGeco Electromagnetics Summary To further explore the potential data content and inherent limitations of a detailed 3D Controlled Source ElectroMagnetic and
More informationSpecial Section Marine Control-Source Electromagnetic Methods
GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 7, NO. MARCH-APRIL 7 ; P. WA63 WA7, FIGS. 9/43647 Special Section Marine Control-Source Electromagnetic Methods D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modeling: Part The effect of
More informationModeling of 3D MCSEM and Sensitivity Analysis
PIERS ONLINE, VOL. 3, NO. 5, 2007 641 Modeling of 3D MCSEM and Sensitivity Analysis Zhanxiang He 1, 2, Zhigang Wang 2, Gang Yu 3, Kurt Strack 3, and Haiying Liu 2 1 Department of Geosciences, University
More information2011 SEG SEG San Antonio 2011 Annual Meeting 771. Summary. Method
Geological Parameters Effecting Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Feasibility: A North Sea Sand Reservoir Example Michelle Ellis and Robert Keirstead, RSI Summary Seismic and electromagnetic data measure
More informationTowed Streamer EM Integrated interpretation for accurate characterization of the sub-surface. PETEX, Tuesday 15th of November 2016
Towed Streamer EM Integrated interpretation for accurate characterization of the sub-surface. PETEX, Tuesday 15th of November 2016 Joshua May Sales and Marketing Manager Agenda Introduction to Towed Streamer
More informationA Brief Introduction to Magnetotellurics and Controlled Source Electromagnetic Methods
A Brief Introduction to Magnetotellurics and Controlled Source Electromagnetic Methods Frank Morrison U.C. Berkeley With the help of: David Alumbaugh Erika Gasperikova Mike Hoversten Andrea Zirilli A few
More informationAnisotropic 2.5D Inversion of Towed Streamer EM Data from Three North Sea Fields Using Parallel Adaptive Finite Elements
Anisotropic 2.5D Inversion of Towed Streamer EM Data from Three North Sea Fields Using Parallel Adaptive Finite Elements K. Key (Scripps Institution of Oceanography), Z. Du* (PGS), J. Mattsson (PGS), A.
More informationControlled-source electromagnetic imaging of the Middle America Trench o"shore Nicaragua
Controlled-source electromagnetic imaging of the Middle America Trench o"shore Nicaragua Kerry Key Scripps Institution of Oceanography Collaborators: Samer Naif (SIO, now LDEO), Steven Constable (SIO),
More informationTowed Streamer EM data from Barents Sea, Norway
Towed Streamer EM data from Barents Sea, Norway Anwar Bhuiyan*, Eivind Vesterås and Allan McKay, PGS Summary The measured Towed Streamer EM data from a survey in the Barents Sea, undertaken in the Norwegian
More informationThe feasibility of reservoir monitoring using time-lapse marine CSEM
GEOPHYSICS, VOL., NO. MARCH-APRIL 9 ; P. F F9, FIGS..9/.9 The feasibility of reservoir monitoring using time-lapse marine CSEM Arnold Orange, Kerry Key, and Steven Constable ABSTRACT Monitoring changes
More informationD034 On the Effects of Anisotropy in Marine CSEM
D034 On the Effects of Anisotropy in Marine CSEM L.O. Løseth* (Statoil ASA, formerly Dept. of Physics, NTNU), B. Ursin (Dept. of Appl. Geophys., NTNU) & L. Amundsen (Statoil ASA) SUMMARY In marine CSEM
More informationTu B3 15 Multi-physics Characterisation of Reservoir Prospects in the Hoop Area of the Barents Sea
Tu B3 15 Multi-physics Characterisation of Reservoir Prospects in the Hoop Area of the Barents Sea P. Alvarez (RSI), F. Marcy (ENGIE E&P), M. Vrijlandt (ENGIE E&P), K. Nichols (RSI), F. Bolivar (RSI),
More informationSummary. Introduction
Noel Black*, Glenn A. Wilson, TechnoImaging, Alexander V. Gribenko and Michael S. Zhdanov, TechnoImaging and The University of Utah Summary Recent studies have inferred the feasibility of time-lapse controlled-source
More informationIPTC PP Challenges in Shallow Water CSEM Surveying: A Case History from Southeast Asia
IPTC-11511-PP Challenges in Shallow Water CSEM Surveying: A Case History from Southeast Asia Sandeep K. Chandola*, Rashidah Karim, Amy Mawarni, Russikin Ismail, Noreehan Shahud, Ramlee Rahman, Paul Bernabe
More informationEstimating vertical and horizontal resistivity of the overburden and the reservoir for the Alvheim Boa field. Folke Engelmark* and Johan Mattsson, PGS
Estimating vertical and horizontal resistivity of the overburden and the reservoir for the Alvheim Boa field. Folke Engelmark* and Johan Mattsson, PGS Summary Towed streamer EM data was acquired in October
More informationG008 Advancing Marine Controlled Source Electromagnetics in the Santos Basin, Brazil
G008 Advancing Marine Controlled Source Electromagnetics in the Santos Basin, Brazil M.P. Buonora* (Petrobras), A. Zerilli (WesternGeco Electromagnetics), T. Labruzzo (WesternGeco Electromagnetics) & L.F.
More informationRepeatability and Detectability Requirements for 4D CSEM
Master Thesis, Department of Geosciences Repeatability and Detectability Requirements for 4D CSEM Sensitivity analysis, inversion-based analysis and interpretation of 4D CSEM data to determine the minimum
More informationModeling and interpretation of CSEM data from Bressay, Bentley and Kraken area of East Shetland Platform, North Sea
from Bressay, Bentley and Kraken area of East Shetland Platform, North Sea Anwar Bhuiyan*, Rune Sakariassen, Øystein Hallanger and Allan McKay, PGS Summary The heavy oil reservoirs of the Bentley, Bressay
More informationGeophysical model response in a shale gas
Geophysical model response in a shale gas Dhananjay Kumar and G. Michael Hoversten Chevron USA Inc. Abstract Shale gas is an important asset now. The production from unconventional reservoir like shale
More informationNational Geophysical Survey Science Opportunities
National Geophysical Survey Science Opportunities Anton Ziolkowski Professor of Petroleum Geoscience University of Edinburgh BGS Keyworth 4 April 2016 Outline Brief biography Science opportunities High
More informationWe A Multi-Measurement Integration Case Study from West Loppa Area in the Barents Sea
We-16-12 A Multi-Measurement ntegration Case Study from West Loppa Area in the Barents Sea. Guerra* (WesternGeco), F. Ceci (WesternGeco), A. Lovatini (WesternGeco), F. Miotti (WesternGeco), G. Milne (WesternGeco),
More informationSeismic processing of numerical EM data John W. Neese* and Leon Thomsen, University of Houston
Seismic processing of numerical EM data John W. Neese* and Leon Thomsen, University of Houston Summary The traditional methods for acquiring and processing CSEM data are very different from those for seismic
More informationUsing seismic guided EM inversion to explore a complex geological area: An application to the Kraken and Bressay heavy oil discoveries, North Sea
Using seismic guided EM inversion to explore a complex geological area: An application to the Kraken and Bressay heavy oil discoveries, North Sea Zhijun Du*, PGS Summary The integrated analysis of controlled
More informationDownloaded 08/29/13 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at
New approach to 3D inversion of MCSEM and MMT data using multinary model transform Alexander V. Gribenko and Michael S. Zhdanov, University of Utah and TechnoImaging SUMMARY Marine controlled-source electromagnetic
More informationPhD Thesis. Multiscale methods for CSEM data interpretation
UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI FEDERICO II C.I.R.Am. Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca Ambiente Dottorato di Ricerca in Analisi dei Sistemi Ambientali XXV Cycle PhD Thesis Multiscale methods for
More informationReducing Uncertainty through Multi-Measurement Integration: from Regional to Reservoir scale
Reducing Uncertainty through Multi-Measurement Integration: from Regional to Reservoir scale Efthimios Tartaras Data Processing & Modeling Manager, Integrated Electromagnetics CoE, Schlumberger Geosolutions
More informationX004 3D CSEM Inversion Strategy - An Example Offshore West of Greenland
X004 3D CSEM Inversion Strategy - An Example Offshore West of Greenland A. Lovatini* (WesternGeco EM - Geosystem), M.D. Watts (WesternGeco EM - Geosystem), K. Umbach (EnCana Corp.) & A. Ferster (EnCana
More informationRock physics integration of CSEM and seismic data: a case study based on the Luva gas field.
Rock physics integration of CSEM and seismic data: a case study based on the Luva gas field. Peter Harris*, Zhijun Du, Harald H. Soleng, Lucy M. MacGregor, Wiebke Olsen, OHM-Rock Solid Images Summary It
More informationSummary. Introduction
Effect of over- and under-burden on time-lapse CSEM monitoring capabilities Arash JafarGandomi* and Andrew Curtis, School of GeoSciences, The University of Edinburgh, Kings Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JW,
More informationImproved Exploration, Appraisal and Production Monitoring with Multi-Transient EM Solutions
Improved Exploration, Appraisal and Production Monitoring with Multi-Transient EM Solutions Folke Engelmark* PGS Multi-Transient EM, Asia-Pacific, Singapore folke.engelmark@pgs.com Summary Successful as
More informationSummary. (a) (b) Introduction
er well in AC 818, Gulf of Mexico Cam Kanhalangsy, Nick Golubev, Jurgen Johann Zach, Daniel Baltar*, EMGS Americas Summary We present anisotropic 2.5D inversion examples illustrating the possibility to
More informationIntegrating seismic, CSEM, and well-log data for reservoir characterization
H o n o r a r y L e c t u r e Integrating seismic, CSEM, and well-log data for reservoir characterization Lucy MacGregor, RSI S urely seismic tells you everything you need to know about the Earth? This
More informationDownloaded 10/29/15 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at
CSEM based Anisotropy trends in the Barents Sea. Slim Bouchrara *, Lucy MacGregor, Amanda Alvarez, Michelle Ellis, Rolf Ackermann, Paola Newton, Robert Keirstead, Alburto Rusic,Yijie Zhou and Hung-Wen
More informationIdentified a possible new offset location where the customer is currently exploring drill options.
GroundMetrics was hired to conduct a Full-Field Resistivity Survey for an oil and gas producer that needed to make crucial decisions to drive profitability at the location. The results saved them hundreds
More informationSub-basalt exploration in the Kutch-Saurashtra basin using EM
Sub-basalt exploration in the Kutch-Saurashtra basin using EM Paper ID: 2003081 Deepankar Borgohain 1, Krishna Kumar 2, U G Marathe 3, Pradipta Mishra 3, Deepak Kumar 1 1.EMGS Asia Pacific Sdn Bhd, 1009
More informationDownloaded 03/06/15 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at
Integration of seismic, CSEM and well data in the Perdido basin, Gulf of Mexico Philippe Nivlet, Luis Sánchez Pérez, EMGS Services México, José Antonio Escalera Alcocer, José Trinidad Martínez Vázquez,
More informationSEG Houston 2009 International Exposition and Annual Meeting
The role of EM rock physics and seismic data in integrated 3D CSEM data analysis I. Brevik*, StatoilHydro, Pål T. Gabrielsen, Vestfonna and Jan Petter Morten, EMGS Summary An extensive 3D CSEM dataset
More informationSEAFLOOR ELECTROMAGNETIC METHODS CONSORTIUM A research proposal submitted by
SEAFLOOR ELECTROMAGNETIC METHODS CONSORTIUM A research proposal submitted by Steven Constable and Kerry Key Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics Scripps Institution of Oceanography La Jolla CA
More informationPOTASH DRAGON CHILE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY TRANSIENT ELECTROMAGNETIC (TEM) METHOD. LLAMARA and SOLIDA PROJECTS SALAR DE LLAMARA, IQUIQUE, REGION I, CHILE
POTASH DRAGON CHILE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY TRANSIENT ELECTROMAGNETIC (TEM) METHOD LLAMARA and SOLIDA PROJECTS SALAR DE LLAMARA, IQUIQUE, REGION I, CHILE OCTOBER 2012 CONTENT Page I INTRODUCTION 1 II FIELD
More informationThe prediction of reservoir
Risk Reduction in Gas Reservoir Exploration Using Joint Seismic-EM Inversion GAS EXPLORATION By Yoram Rubin, G. Michael Hoversten, Zhangshuan Hou and Jinsong Chen, University of California, Berkeley A
More informationSIO223A A Brief Introduction to Geophysical Modeling and Inverse Theory.
SIO223A A Brief Introduction to Geophysical Modeling and Inverse Theory. Forward modeling: data model space space ˆd = f(x, m) m =(m 1,m 2,..., m N ) x =(x 1,x 2,x 3,..., x km ) ˆd =(ˆd 1, ˆd 2, ˆd 3,...,
More informationElectrical prospecting involves detection of surface effects produced by electrical current flow in the ground.
Electrical Surveys in Geophysics Electrical prospecting involves detection of surface effects produced by electrical current flow in the ground. Electrical resistivity method Induced polarization (IP)
More informationA Broadband marine CSEM demonstration survey to map the Uranus salt structure
A Broadband marine CSEM demonstration survey to map the Uranus salt structure M. Vöge ( 1 ), A. A. Pfaffhuber ( 1 ), K. Hokstad ( 2 ), B. Fotland( 2 ) ( 1 ) Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Sognsveien
More informationSEG Houston 2009 International Exposition and Annual Meeting
: The Santos Basin Project - Brazil Andrea Zerilli * and Tiziano Labruzzo, WesternGeco EM, Marco Polo Buonora, Paulo de Tarso Luiz Menezes and Luiz Felipe Rodrigues, Petrobras E&P/GEOF/MP Summary The Santos
More informationDetection, Delineation and Characterization of Shallow Anomalies Using Dual Sensor Seismic and Towed Streamer EM data
Detection, Delineation and Characterization of Shallow Anomalies Using Dual Sensor Seismic and Towed Streamer EM data A.J. McKay* (Petroleum Geo-Services ASA), M. Widmaier (Petroleum Geo- Services ASA),
More informationConsider a Geonics EM31 with the TX and RX dipoles a distance s = 3 m apart.
E Near field, frequency domain EM systems E.1 EM responses of 1-D resistivity models E.1.1 Response of a halfspace Consider a Geonics EM31 with the TX and RX dipoles a distance s = 3 m apart. The TX and
More informationMagnetotelluric (MT) Method
Magnetotelluric (MT) Method Dr. Hendra Grandis Graduate Program in Applied Geophysics Faculty of Mining and Petroleum Engineering ITB Geophysical Methods Techniques applying physical laws (or theory) to
More informationWe E Estimation of Induction Noise in a Towed EM Streamer
We E108 07 Estimation of Induction Noise in a Towed EM Streamer A.L. Tcheheumeni Djanni* (The University of Edinburgh), A. Ziolkowski (The University of Edinburgh) & D. Wright (The University of Edinburgh)
More informationAn Introduction to Marine Controlled Source Electromagnetic Methods
An Introduction to Marine Controlled Source Electromagnetic Methods Steven Constable 1 and Leonard J. Srnka 2 1 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, USA, sconstable@ucsd.edu ( corresponding
More informationSubsurface hydrocarbons detected by electromagnetic sounding
first break volume 23, March 2005 technical article Subsurface hydrocarbons detected by electromagnetic sounding S.E. Johansen 1, H.E.F. Amundsen 2, T. Røsten 3, S. Ellingsrud 1, T. Eidesmo 1 and A.H.
More informationGeophysics Course Introduction to DC Resistivity
NORAD supported project in MRRD covering Capacity Building and Institutional Cooperation in the field of Hydrogeology for Faryab Province Afghanistan Geophysics Course Introduction to DC Resistivity By
More informationPluto 1.5 2D ELASTIC MODEL FOR WAVEFIELD INVESTIGATIONS OF SUBSALT OBJECTIVES, DEEP WATER GULF OF MEXICO*
Pluto 1.5 2D ELASTIC MODEL FOR WAVEFIELD INVESTIGATIONS OF SUBSALT OBJECTIVES, DEEP WATER GULF OF MEXICO* *This paper has been submitted to the EAGE for presentation at the June 2001 EAGE meeting. SUMMARY
More informationSPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES is funded principally through a grant of the SPE FOUNDATION
SPE DISTINGUISHED LECTURER SERIES is funded principally through a grant of the SPE FOUNDATION The Society gratefully acknowledges those companies that support the program by allowing their professionals
More informationRC 1.3. SEG/Houston 2005 Annual Meeting 1307
from seismic AVO Xin-Gong Li,University of Houston and IntSeis Inc, De-Hua Han, and Jiajin Liu, University of Houston Donn McGuire, Anadarko Petroleum Corp Summary A new inversion method is tested to directly
More informationUse of Seismic and EM Data for Exploration, Appraisal and Reservoir Characterization
Use of Seismic and EM Data for Exploration, Appraisal and Reservoir Characterization Anton Ziolkowski and Folke Engelmark Petroleum Geo-Services CSEG, Calgary, 6 May 2009 Outline Exploration, appraisal,
More informationSubsurface Geology and Resource Exploration
LAB 11. Subsurface Geology and Resource Exploration Locating earth resources such as aluminum, copper, gold and gemstones has been an important job for geologists for a long time. This lab deals with the
More information6298 Stress induced azimuthally anisotropic reservoir - AVO modeling
6298 Stress induced azimuthally anisotropic reservoir - AVO modeling M. Brajanovski* (Curtin University of Technology), B. Gurevich (Curtin University of Technology), D. Nadri (CSIRO) & M. Urosevic (Curtin
More informationPredicting Gas Hydrates Using Prestack Seismic Data in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico (JIP Projects)
Predicting Gas Hydrates Using Prestack Seismic Data in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico (JIP Projects) Dianna Shelander 1, Jianchun Dai 2, George Bunge 1, Dan McConnell 3, Niranjan Banik 2 1 Schlumberger / DCS
More informationGeoelectricity. ieso 2010
Geoelectricity ieso 2010 1 RESISTIVITY SURVEY AT VENETO VILLA GRITTI AT THE TOWN OF TREVISO (VENETO REGION) The survey was carried out to verify the underground presence of the fondations of a rustic building.
More informationHydrocarbon Volumetric Analysis Using Seismic and Borehole Data over Umoru Field, Niger Delta-Nigeria
International Journal of Geosciences, 2011, 2, 179-183 doi:10.4236/ijg.2011.22019 Published Online May 2011 (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijg) Hydrocarbon Volumetric Analysis Using Seismic and Borehole
More informationSeismoelectric Ground-flow DC-4500 Locator
Seismoelectric Ground-flow DC-4500 Locator Introduction The seismoelectric survey is a new technology combined the electro kinetic potential method and geophysical technology. It is applied directly to
More informationKMS Technologies KJT Enterprises, Inc. Novel Marine Electromagnetics: from Deep into Shallow Water
KMS Technologies KJT Enterprises, Inc. Novel Marine Electromagnetics: from Deep into Shallow Water Thomsen, L., Meaux, D., Li, S., Weiss, C., Sharma, A., Allegar, N., and Strack, K.-M. Recent Advances
More informationMT Prospecting. Map Resistivity. Determine Formations. Determine Structure. Targeted Drilling
MT Prospecting Map Resistivity Determine Formations Determine Structure Targeted Drilling Cross-sectional interpretation before and after an MT survey of a mineral exploration prospect containing volcanic
More informationGas hydrate-related sedimentary pore pressure changes offshore Angola
Gas hydrate-related sedimentary pore pressure changes offshore Angola Christian Berndt and Bedanta Goswami 1 National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, U.K. cbe@noc.soton.ac.uk, bedantag@gmail.com ABSTRACT
More informationThe Afar Rift Consortium
The Afar Rift Consortium University of Bristol University of Oxford University of Cambridge British Geological Survey University of Rochester University of Auckland, NZ Opportunistic programme following
More informationSeismic wavepropagation concepts applied to the interpretation of marine controlled-source electromagnetics
Seismic wavepropagation concepts applied to the interpretation of marine controlled-source electromagnetics Rune Mittet, EMGS SUMMARY are very useful for the interpretation of seismic data. Moreover, these
More informationDownloaded 11/20/12 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at
AVO crossplot analysis in unconsolidated sediments containing gas hydrate and free gas: Green Canyon 955, Gulf of Mexico Zijian Zhang* 1, Daniel R. McConnell 1, De-hua Han 2 1 Fugro GeoConsulting, Inc.,
More information3. Magnetic Methods / 62
Contents Preface to the Second Edition / xv Excerpts from Preface to the FirstEdition / xvii Mathematical Conventions / xix 1. Introduction / 1 Reference / 5 2. Gravity Methods / 6 2. I. Introduction /
More informationAcoustic Anisotropy Measurements and Interpretation in Deviated Wells
Acoustic Anisotropy Measurements and Interpretation in Deviated Wells X. M. Tang, and D. Patterson, Houston Technology Center, Baker Atlas, Houston, Texas, USA ABSTRACT Many acoustic anisotropy measurements
More informationGeophysics for Environmental and Geotechnical Applications
Geophysics for Environmental and Geotechnical Applications Dr. Katherine Grote University of Wisconsin Eau Claire Why Use Geophysics? Improve the quality of site characterization (higher resolution and
More informationDetermination of reservoir properties from the integration of CSEM and seismic data
Determination of reservoir properties from the integration of CSEM and seismic data Peter Harris, 1 Rock Solid Images, and Lucy MacGregor, 2 Offshore Hydrocarbons Mapping, discuss the advantages in reservoir
More informationH005 Pre-salt Depth Imaging of the Deepwater Santos Basin, Brazil
H005 Pre-salt Depth Imaging of the Deepwater Santos Basin, Brazil Y. Huang* (CGGVeritas), D. Lin (CGGVeritas), B. Bai (CGGVeritas), S. Roby (CGGVeritas) & C. Ricardez (CGGVeritas) SUMMARY Several discoveries,
More informationReservoir properties inversion from AVO attributes
Reservoir properties inversion from AVO attributes Xin-gang Chi* and De-hua Han, University of Houston Summary A new rock physics model based inversion method is put forward where the shaly-sand mixture
More informationPART A: Short-answer questions (50%; each worth 2%)
PART A: Short-answer questions (50%; each worth 2%) Your answers should be brief (just a few words) and may be written on these pages if you wish. Remember to hand these pages in with your other exam pages!
More informationA multigrid integral equation method for large-scale models with inhomogeneous backgrounds
IOP PUBLISHING JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING J. Geophys. Eng. (28) 438 447 doi:1.188/1742-2132//4/7 A integral equation method for large-scale models with inhomogeneous backgrounds Masashi Endo,
More informationThe elastic properties such as velocity, density, impedance,
SPECIAL SECTION: Rr ock Physics physics Lithology and fluid differentiation using rock physics template XIN-GANG CHI AND DE-HUA HAN, University of Houston The elastic properties such as velocity, density,
More informationMarine CSEM of the Scarborough gas field, Part 2: 2D inversion
GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 8, NO. (MAY-JUNE 5); P. E87 E96, FIGS..9/GEO4-48. Downloaded 4/7/5 to 7..9.. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/ Marine CSEM
More informationNew EM technology offerings are growing quickly
Exploration/ Reservoir Vol. 226 No. 6 June 2005 New EM technology offerings are growing quickly After decades of languishing in scientific use, a variety of geo-electromagnetic techniques are coming into
More informationApplication of sensitivity analysis in DC resistivity monitoring of SAGD steam chambers
The University of British Columbia Geophysical Inversion Facility Application of sensitivity analysis in DC resistivity monitoring of SAGD steam chambers S. G. R. Devriese and D. W. Oldenburg gif.eos.ubc.ca
More informationSEAM2: 3D NON-SEISMIC MODELING OF A COMPLEX MIDDLE EAST O&G PROSPECT
6th International Symposium on Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics Berkeley, California, USA, March 28-3, 217 SEAM2: 3D NON-SEISMIC MODELING OF A COMPLEX MIDDLE EAST O&G PROSPECT M. D. Watts 1, R. L. Mackie
More informationElectrical Impedance Tomography of a Seafloor Volcano R.V. Revelle shiptime proposal submitted by David Myer, Steven Constable, and Kerry Key
Electrical Impedance Tomography of a Seafloor Volcano R.V. Revelle shiptime proposal submitted by David Myer, Steven Constable, and Kerry Key Abstract. We propose to use R.V. Roger Revelle student shiptime
More informationIntegrated Geophysical Model for Suswa Geothermal Prospect using Resistivity, Seismics and Gravity Survey Data in Kenya
Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015 Melbourne, Australia, 19-25 April 2015 Integrated Geophysical Model for Suswa Geothermal Prospect using Resistivity, Seismics and Gravity Survey Data in Kenya
More informationE : Ground-penetrating radar (GPR)
Geophysics 3 March 009 E : Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) The EM methods in section D use low frequency signals that trael in the Earth by diffusion. These methods can image resistiity of the Earth on
More informationGY 402: Sedimentary Petrology
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA GY 402: Sedimentary Petrology Lecture 27: Introduction to Wireline Log Interpretations Instructor: Dr. Douglas W. Haywick Last Time Carbonate Diagenesis Diagenesis 0.5 mm PPL
More informationSome consideration about fluid substitution without shear wave velocity Fuyong Yan*, De-Hua Han, Rock Physics Lab, University of Houston
ain enu Some consideration about fluid substitution without shear wave velocity Fuyong Yan*, De-Hua Han, Rock Physics Lab, University of Houston Summary When S-wave velocity is absent, approximate Gassmann
More informationSo I have a Seismic Image, But what is in that Image?
P-513 So I have a Seismic Image, But what is in that Image? Dr. Nader C. Dutta, Schlumberger Introduction and background Migration involves repositioning of returned signals in a seismic experiment to
More informationSEG Houston 2009 International Exposition and Annual Meeting SUMMARY
Simultaneous joint inversion of MT and CSEM data using a multiplicative cost function Aria Abubakar, Maokun Li, Jianguo Liu and Tarek M. Habashy, Schlumberger-Doll Research, Cambridge, MA, USA SUMMARY
More informationA11 Planning Time-lapse CSEM-surveys for Joint Seismic-EM Monitoring of Geological Carbon Dioxide Injection
A11 Planning Time-lapse CSEM-surveys for Joint Seismic-EM Monitoring of Geological Carbon Dioxide Injection T. Norman* (NTNU Trondheim and EMGS ASA), H. Alnes (StatoilHydro Research Trondheim), O. Christensen
More informationMaxwell s Equations & Hertz Waves
Maxwell s Equations & Hertz Waves XI. Maxwell & Electromagnetic Waves A. Maxwell s Equations Dr. Bill Pezzaglia B. Hertz Waves & Poynting C. Polarization Updated: 3Aug5 A. Maxwell s Equations 3. Hints
More informationMagnetotelluric Array and Magnetic Magnetotelluric Surveys
Magnetotelluric Array and Magnetic Magnetotelluric Surveys Dr. Wen J Whan JTech Co., Ltd.; wwj@jtech.com.tw Abstract. Surveys using synchronous MT array could further reduce the local noise. Multi variance
More informationPressure Prediction and Hazard Avoidance through Improved Seismic Imaging
Pressure Prediction and Hazard Avoidance through Improved Seismic Imaging 12121-6002-02 Bill Barkhouse SEG Advanced Modeling Corporation (SEAM) RPSEA / SPE-GCS Ultra-Deepwater Technology Conference September
More informationSeismic Prospecting For Oil By C. Hewitt Dix READ ONLINE
Seismic Prospecting For Oil By C. Hewitt Dix READ ONLINE If you are searched for the ebook by C. Hewitt Dix Seismic Prospecting for Oil in pdf form, in that case you come on to the right site. We presented
More informationDetecting fractures using time-lapse 3C-3D seismic data
data Zimin Zhang, Don C. Lawton and Robert R. Stewart ABSTRACT This report presents the interpretation of time-lapse 3C-3D seismic data for fracture detection in a Saskatchewan potash mine. Seismic interpretation
More informationInterpretation and Reservoir Properties Estimation Using Dual-Sensor Streamer Seismic Without the Use of Well
Interpretation and Reservoir Properties Estimation Using Dual-Sensor Streamer Seismic Without the Use of Well C. Reiser (Petroleum Geo-Services), T. Bird* (Petroleum Geo-Services) & M. Whaley (Petroleum
More informationIntroducing the Stratagem EH4. Electrical Conductivity Imaging System Hybrid-Source Magnetotellurics
Introducing the Stratagem EH4 Electrical Conductivity Imaging System Hybrid-Source Magnetotellurics Stratagem EH4 Hybrid-Source Magnetotellurics Frequency range of 10 Hz to 90k Hz Approx. depth of investigation
More informationIntegrating rock physics and full elastic modeling for reservoir characterization Mosab Nasser and John B. Sinton*, Maersk Oil Houston Inc.
Integrating rock physics and full elastic modeling for reservoir characterization Mosab Nasser and John B. Sinton*, Maersk Oil Houston Inc. Summary Rock physics establishes the link between reservoir properties,
More informationDEEP SAN ANDREAS FAULT BOUNDARY STRUCTURE FROM MARINE MAGNETOTELLURICS A
DEEP SAN ANDREAS FAULT BOUNDARY STRUCTURE FROM MARINE MAGNETOTELLURICS A proposal submitted to UC Shipfunds for New Horizon and Sproul shiptime Brent Wheelock Kerry Key and Steven Constable SUMMARY Knowledge
More informationElectrical Methods. Resistivity Surveying
Electrical Methods Resistivity Surveying Geologic Resistivity 1101 Resistivity surveying investigates variations of electrical resistance, by causing an electrical current to flow through the subsurface
More informationSite Characterization & Hydrogeophysics
Site Characterization & Hydrogeophysics (Source: Matthew Becker, California State University) Site Characterization Definition: quantitative description of the hydraulic, geologic, and chemical properties
More information