Integration of Rock Physics Models in a Geostatistical Seismic Inversion for Reservoir Rock Properties


 Barry Foster
 8 months ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Integration of Rock Physics Models in a Geostatistical Seismic Inversion for Reservoir Rock Properties Amaro C. 1 Abstract: The main goal of reservoir modeling and characterization is the inference of the spatial distribution of petrophysical properties of interest, such as facies, porosity, mineral volumes and fluids. Usually this is a twostep approach where the petrophysical properties of interest are derived from inverted elastic models. This sequential approach does not ensure the propagation of the uncertainty related to the seismic inversion problem into the resulting rock property models. This problem can be tackled by inverting the seismic reflection data directly to petrophysical properties (e.g. porosity, volume of shale and water saturation) ensuring the propagation of the uncertainty and measurement errors into the estimated subsurface models. The purpose of this work is to invert seismic reflection data directly to petrophysical properties, to properly propagate the uncertainty related to the seismic inversion problem and measurement errors into the estimated subsurface elastic models. It is presented a novel methodology that combines rockphysics models and a stochastic inversion with global perturbation method, that can quantify the relationship between geologic processes and the corresponding geophysical signatures. This method has been tested on real welllog data and partially stacked seismic data. The application to a real reservoir converges towards the real seismic data and provided realistic petrophysical models and facies volume with the corresponding elastic models retrieved from the rockphysics modeling process. Keywords: Geostatistical Seismic Inversion, RockPhysics Models, Facies, Reservoir Modeling INTRODUCTION Reservoir s performance is directly related to the natural heterogeneities of the subsurface geology. Within the exploration and production stages, reservoir modeling plays a crucial role in the assessment of the productive zones. The main goal of reservoir characterization is to identify the spatial distribution of the petrophysical properties of interest, such as facies, porosity, mineral volumes and fluid. Frequently, petrophysical properties are derived from inverted elastic models in a twostep approach. When inverting seismic reflection data directly to petrophysical properties, the uncertainty related to the seismic inversion problem and measurement errors, is propagated into the estimated subsurface models. The integration of rockphysics modeling within the inversion loop allows linking the inverted subsurface rock properties with the corresponding elastic response. The inference of petrophysical properties is based on a perturbation technique that performs a stochastic sequential simulation (DSS; Soares 2001) and cosimulation with joint probability distributions (Horta and Soares 2010) of the model parameter space, ensuring the reproduction of the prior probability distributions, honouring the data values at each location, reproducing the original statistics (mean and variance), as well as reproducing the spatial continuity pattern imposed by the variogram model. Contrary to Sequential Gaussian Simulation (SGS; Deutsch and Journel 1998), the use of DSS allows the distribution of the property to be directly simulated without any transforms, as estimated from the experimental data (i.e. welllog data). The selection of the first property to simulate should consider the quality of the available welllog data. As a bestpractice, this property should be the one associated with a larger uncertainty and smoother. Each set of simulated and cosimulated petrophysical properties generate a facies volume with a Bayesian 1 Petroleum Engineering MSc Candidate, Center for Modeling Petroleum Reservoirs, CERENA/DECivil, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
2 classification. A key input of the inversion for petrophysical properties and facies, are the prior facies proportions. These proportions are normally estimated from the available welllog data before the inversion procedure and propagate the corresponding uncertainty in zones away from the wells. In most cases (e.g. Grana and Della Rossa 2010) there are three main lithofluid classes: shale, brine sand and oil sand. To constrain even more the reservoir, other subcategories can be used, such as the stiffness of the mineral material. In simpler cases, it is easy to identify clusters to constrain the prior probabilities, but when dealing with a complex reservoir more properties can helpful. In cases where the training data, constructed from the welllog data is statistically representative of the reservoir conditions, Bayesian classification is a successful application to classify facies. On the other hand, when few wells are available to represent the lithologies and fluid types, a useful method is to increase the training data with Monte Carlo Simulation. The resulting facies models represent the link between the rock properties and the real subsurface geology and are conditioned not only to the available seismic reflection data but also to the existing welllog data. The generated set of models composed by water saturation, porosity, volume of shale and facies volume are used as input in an ensemble of faciesdependent rockphysics models (RPMs) to predict the seismic velocities (upper and lower bounds of seismic velocities) of a rock and/or facies. RPMs are used to link data from different domains, i.e to improve coherency between the subsurface rock properties and elastic properties. They can be represented by a simple regression based on welllog data or a complex physical model, with a number of elastic parameters to be estimated e.g., elastic moduli of matrix and fluid components, critical porosity, aspect ratio, and/or coordination number (Mavko et al. 2009). There are two fundamental tasks for this method to be consistent: a welllog calibration of the rockphysics models and quality control. Then, the main procedure is to ajust a theoretical model to a trend in the data. The solid phase, is the mineral part of a composite made of the mineral frame and the pore fluid (Dvorkin et al. 2014). Granular media models describe the rock as a collection of separate gains that contact between them with a certain stiffness. This model is usually applicable to sandstones (Simm and Bacon 2014) and based on HertzMindlin contact theory (Dvorkin et al. 1994). A very effective approach starts by the definition of the elastic properties the endmembers. At zero porosity, the rock must have the properties of the mineral, and at the high porosity, the elastic contact theory determines the elastic properties. The interpolation of this two endmembers is based on upper and lower HashinShtrikman bounds. The upper bound is usually associated with the contact cement (stiffsand model) and the uncemented or low cemented rock (softsand model) is represented by the lower bound (Mavko et al. 2009). The effect of pore fluid is accounted by using Gassmanns equation (1951) which is the most common model, within this setting, to predict fluid substitution effects at low seismic frequencies (Mavko et al. 2009). The soft and stiffsand models for V P and V S can be computed for a wet rock, by first calculating the models for a roomdry grain pack to posteriorly use them in Gassmanns fluid substitution equation. Densities for the matrix and fluid can be computed using Woods (1955) formula. The faciesdependent rockphysics models allow the calculation of velocities and densities for each facies individually, to posteriorly generate synthetic seismograms following Shueys (1985) 3terms approximation. The quality of the inversion results are assessed based on the match between the calculated synthetic seismic data and the real seismic reflection data with a correlation coefficient. Within global inversion approaches, the highest correlation coefficient portions of the generated models are selected and used along with the corresponding local correlation coefficients, to produce new sets of rock property models in a cosimulation. At each iteration, it is performed an update of the set of rock properties based on the tracebytrace match between the real and synthetic seismic data. 2
3 METHODOLOGY Figure 1  Schematic representation of the general framework of the proposed methodology. The proposed iterative geostatistical seismic inversion methodology (Figure 1) integrates rockphysics modelling contains the following main steps. First, DSS simulates water saturation models using the available welllog as experimental data and a spatial continuity pattern as revealed by a variogram model. Then, codss with joint probability distributions is used to cosimulate porosity models given the previously simulated water saturation models and the available welllog data. The simulation of volume of shale models also recurs to codss with joint probability distributions, given the water saturation previously inverted model and the available welllog data. Before applying a classification algorithm, a training data is generated from the welllog data. The facies of interest are identified in a petrophysical domain such as water saturation versus porosity and porosity versus volume of shale, resulting in five facies: stiffshale, softshale, stiffbrine sand, softbrine sand and softoil sand. Then a Bayesian classification algorithm uses the previously simulated models and the training data to create a facies volume. A facies dependent rockphysics modelling uses the set of three simulated models (water saturation, porosity, volume of shale) and the facies volume to compute V P, V S and density. The resulting P and S velocity models along with density are used to compute angledependent reflection coefficients which are then convolved with angledependent wavelets to generate synthetic seismic data, following Shueys' linear approximation After generating the partially stacked synthetic seismic reflection data each synthetic 3 seismic trace is individually compared against the corresponding real seismic trace in terms of correlation coefficient. At each iteration, and from the ensemble of rock properties generated during the first step of the proposed algorithm, the portions of these models that ensure the highest correlation coefficient between real and synthetic seismic for all angles are simultaneously selected with the correlation coefficients. The selection procedure is based on crossover genetic algorithm where the best genes (portions of the petrophysical models from different realizations that ensure the highest correlation coefficient) of each iteration are then used as seed for the generation of a new family of models during the next iterations. Iterate the entire procedure until a given global correlation coefficient between the angledependent synthetic and real seismic data is above a certain threshold. REAL DATA EXAMPLE The available dataset comprises four partial angle stacks, with mean reflection angles of 9º, 15º, 21º and 27º and their corresponding dependent wavelets and a set of four welllogs composed by porosity, volume of shale, water saturation and P and SImpedance. The inversion grid has 159x419x128 cells in i, j and k directions respectively. The grid cell size was defined to reproduce the original inline and crossline spacing and the original seismic sampling interval, 2 ms. The joint distributions between water saturation versus porosity and porosity versus volume of shale are used as conditioning data in the direct sequential cosimulation with joint probability distributions (Horta and Soares 2010). In this way, the inverted petroelastic models mimic the real reservoir conditions by reproducing the relationships between the primary and secondary variables (Figure 3). The spatial continuity pattern of each property individually is imposed by a variogram model, estimated for all properties in study for the vertical direction. These variograms are part of the geostatistical inversion procedure and are used as
4 conditioning data for the stochastic sequential simulation of the petroelastic properties of interest. As a geostatistical inversion procedure, each model reproduces the welllog data at its locations, the variogram model imposed during the stochastic sequential simulation and the marginal and joint probability distributions as inferred from the available welllog data. The rock property models (water saturation, porosity and volume of shale; Figure 2) agree with the main structures as interpreted from the original seismic data and from previous inversion studies over this reservoir. The interpretation of the mean model of the ensemble of petrophysical models simulated in the last iteration (Figure 2) is one way of interpreting the results of geostatistical seismic inversion. However, it is important to highlight that the individual realizations have higher variability presenting small and largescale details. In the inverted models of water saturation, porosity and volume of shale, the welllog data values are reproduced at well locations, as well as the histograms of each property. The proposed methodology also allows the assessment of the uncertainty of each property individually by for example, the variance model at a given iteration. Notice that assessing the uncertainty related with each property individually is of great importance for better reservoir modeling. Usually, these areas are associated with low signaltonoise ratio, i.e., areas with higher uncertainty, seismic and the inverted models do not match with the seismic. Areas with high variability are related to more uncertainty regarding the model parameters, and usually correspond to areas far from the wells, where fewer data is available. Before the inversion of petrophysical properties (continuous quantities), facies (discrete quantities) were classified in four facies. Each facies must be defined such as it captures the physics of the reservoir s geology. The facies of interest are identified in a petrophysical domain such as water saturation versus porosity and porosity versus volume of shale. First, three main groups are classified based on the welllog data rock properties (Figure 5a and Figure 5c): shale, brine sand and oil sand. This classification is based on assumptions related to the known geology of the reservoir, i.e. a) d) b) c) Figure 3  Joint distributions from the welllogs (on the left) and from the bestfit models of iteration 6 (on the right) of water saturation versus porosity (a;c) and porosity versus volume of shale (b;d). The joint distributions reproduce the ones estimated from the welllog data. a) Water Saturation b) Porosity c) Volume of Shale Figure 2  Vertical section mean models and standard deviation computed from the last 32 models retrieved from the last iteration. From top to bottom: water saturation, porosity and volume of shale. 4
5 facies shale has a shale content threshold of 0.3, while the fluid factor was added by water saturation with a threshold of maximum 0.8 for the oil sands. Then, to isolate the sand reservoir, another classification is performed considering rockphysics. This classification is based on the stiffness of the rock and it splits each shale, brine sand and oil sand into two categories, stiff and soft depending on the porosity and shale content. This classification assumes that shale facies belong to the granular media models, such as sands. According to the available welllog data and the geological setting, the reservoir only has one type of oil sand is present, soft oil sand. A Bayesian classification algorithm is then used to classify all four facies for the entire inversion grid considering the previously simulated petrophysical properties. The resulting facies model reproduce the distributions of water saturation, porosity and volume of shale used as training data (Figure 5b and Figure 5d). The resulting facies volume (Figure 4a) is consistent with the petrophysical models (Figure 2), as well as the structures interpreted in the real seismic. The ensemble of facies models generated during the last iteration may be used to derived facies probability for each facies (Figure 4b), showing the abundance of stiff brine sands where the in the same location where the stiff shale has lower probability of occurrence. The reservoir soft oil sand has high probability of occurrence also in areas where the progradation is located but with less continuity when compared to the predominant facies. It is clear the intercalation between sand and shale facies and the predominance of stiff facies with smallscale details Table 1  Rockphysics model parameters: density ρ, bulk modulus K, and shear modulus μ of the matrix and fluid components for a Φ c of 0.4, n of 4 and Peff of 20 Mpa. ρ (g/cm 3 ) K (GPa) μ (GPa) which is a consequence of constraining the stochastic simulation and cosimulation to the inverted models to posteriorly generate facies volumes. a) b) Figure 4 Vertical section extracted from the bestfit facies model (top) and the probability of occurence of soft oil sand (bottom). Where facies 1 corresponds to soft shale, facies 2 to stiff shale, facies 3 to soft brine sand, facies 4 to stiff brine sand and facies 5 to soft oil sand. a) b) c) d) Sand Shale Oil n.a. Water n.a. Figure 5  Training data for facies modeling using the training data from the wells (on the left); joint distributions from the bestfit inverted models (on the right) of water saturation versus porosity and porosity versus volume of shale. Each joint distribution is color coded by facies. 5
6 b) e) c) f) Figure 6  Vertical sections of the mean elastic models retrieved from the 32 simulations of the last iteratio (on the left) along with the reproduction of the histogram of the inverted model (filled blue) and welllog data (red). From top to bottom, P (a) and S wave velocity (b) and density (c). a) d) The elastic models (Figure 6a, Figure 6b, Figure 6c) calculated from the petrophysical models using the facies dependent rock physics models calibrated with the welllog (Table 1) reproduce the welllog data and the histograms are close to the ones computed from the original welllog data(figure 6d, Figure 6e, Figure 6f). The global correlation coefficient (62%, Figure 8) between the synthetic seismic elastic models is higher than the global correlation coefficient achieved by the mean model (Figure 7). The areas associated with The synthetic seismic reflection data computed from the arithmetic mean elastic models (Figure 9) matches successfully the real partially stacked seismic data. a) Nearstack b) Midnearstack c) Midstack d) Midfarstack Figure 7 Correlation coefficients between the real and synthetic seismic data of all partial angle stacks. From left to right: nearstack, midnearstack, midstack and midfarstack. Figure 8  Global correlation coefficient evolution per iteration. 6
7 It reproduces the location of the main primary reflections and the amplitude variations versus offset. low degree of uncertainty (low standard deviation) are related to areas where the synthetic seismic converged properly towards the real one, associated with high correlation coefficients. On the other hand, areas with low correlation coefficients are possible related with values not considered in the conditioning dataset, as well as seismic data with low signaltonoise ratio, very common in real datasets. Within this a) b) Figure 9 Real reflection data (a) and synthetic seismic section of the arithmetic mean of 32 simulations of the last iteration, of the partial angle midstack. inverse methodology, the noisy areas are assigned a higher uncertainty throughout the entire procedure. DISCUSSION After 6 iterations, an the inversion procedure reached a global correlation coefficient between the synthetic seismic and real seismic of 62%. The use of partially stacked seismic data allows the inversion of seismic directly for rock properties to better distinguish lithofluid facies, instead of the traditional acoustic models. All models obtained from the entire iterative geostatistical inversion procedure with rock physics integration, reproduce: the values of the conditioning data at its locations (Figure 2); the joint and marginal distributions of water saturation, porosity and volume of shale and the spatial continuity model of each property imposed within the sequential simulation by a variogram. This method is successful to discriminate lithology parameters and detect hydrocarbon probability of occurrence directly from the petrophysical properties. From the petrophysical properties itself, it is possible to detect some geological features such as the shale trend along the presented horizontal slice, with low porosity and high shale content crossing the horizontal time slice ( Figure 10c) which is also present in Figure 10d, classified mainly as stiff shale a) Water Saturation b) Porosity c) Volume of Shale d) Facies Volume Figure 10 Horizontal timeslices (from left to right) of water saturation (a), porosity (b), volume of shale (c) and facies volume (d) (k=120). 7
8 with soft shale in some portions of that area, showing the clear relationship of rockphysics per facies. The variance models (Figure 2) computed between the models generated during the last iteration show lower variability i.e., lower spatial uncertainty in the volume of shale inverted models, following water saturation and porosity. Usually high values of variance are related to areas where the seismic is noisy and the inverted petrophysical models cannot produce synthetic seismic data that fits the real seismic, or the lack of real petrophysical properties. Most of the spatial uncertainty is related with the location of geological boundaries of facies bodies, because of its similarities with the inverted petrophysical models (Figure 2) and the facies volume (Figure 4). Also, it is important to highlight that the interpretation of reservoir models along with their corresponding uncertainty allows better decision making and risk management. CONCLUSIONS The presented methodology was successfully designed, implemented and applied in a real dataset resulting in a good match between the real and the inverted synthetic seismic data. The novel iterative geostatistical seismic inversion methodology that simultaneously integrates seismic reflection data, welllog data and rock physics models can retrieve directly from the seismic data reliable petrophysical models such as water saturation porosity, volume of shale and facies volumes. The results of the presented inversion method are consistent with other seismic inversions applied to this reservoir, but also add value due to the identification of new geological features and proper fluid/lithology characterization. This approach provides a direct connection between the seismic response and the geological (petrophysical) properties, by the application of Rock Physics Models allowing the propagation of the uncertainty related to the seismic inversion in onestep approach. It is an efficient method to guide and improve qualitative interpretation, as well as avoid ambiguities in seismic interpretation related to fluids/lithology, sand/shale and porosity/saturation. This novel method can be applied to all reservoir where the physical link between the elastic and petrophysical properties can be described by a suitable rock physics model, as well as adapt other rock properties and lithofluid facies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thanks Schlumberger for the donation of the academic licenses of Petrel and CERENA/IST for supporting this work. CA want to thanks Professor Dario Grana from the University of Wyoming for the valuable input to this work and the Department of Geology and Geophysics for the three months stay. APPENDIX A ROCKPHYSICS MODELS The soft and stiffsand models are based on Hertz Mindlin graincontact theory and provide estimation of the bulk and shear moduli of a dry rock, assuming a random pack of identical spherical grains under an effective pressure P, with a certain critical porosity (Φ c ) and a coordination number (Mavko et al. 2009). and 3 2 P K HM = n2 (1 Φ c ) 2 μ mat 18π 2 (1 ν) 2 2 P μ HM = 5 4ν 3 (1 Φ c ) 2 μ mat 10 5ν 3n2 2π 2 (1 ν) 2 A  1 A  2 where μ mat is the shear modulus of the solid phase and ν is the grain Poissons ratio. The matrix moduli is calculated using VoigtReuss Hill averages for a matrix with sand and clay materials: 8
9 K mat = 1 2 (V 1 ck c + (1 V c )K s + V c + K ) s K c (1 V c ) and A  3 μ mat = 1 2 (V 1 cμ c + (1 V c )μ s + V c + μ ) A  4 s μ c (1 V c ) where V c is the volume of clay, K c, μ c, are the bulk and shear moduli, respectively of the clay and and K s, μ s is the bulk and shear moduli of the sand. The bulk (K HM ) and shear (μ HM ) moduli of a roomdry rock is estimated recurring, for example to HertzMindlin graincontact theory, under the assumption that the sand frame with a random pack of identical spherical grains is under an effective pressure P, with a certain critical porosity ( Φ c ) and a coordination number (Mavko et al. 2009). and 3 2 P K HM = n2 (1 Φ c ) 2 μ mat 18π 2 (1 ν) 2 μ HM = 5 4ν ν 3n 3 (1 Φ c ) 2 μ2 mat P 2π 2 (1 ν) 2 A  5 A  6 where μ mat is the shear modulus of the solid phase and ν is the grain Poissons ratio. For the effective porosity values between zero and the critical porosity, this model that best fits the data (modified lower and/or upper HashinShtrikman bound), interpolates the the two endmembers, i.e. the solidphase elastic moduli (K mat and μ mat ) and the elastic moduli of the dry rock (K HM and μ HM ). At any porosity Φ < Φ c, the main point of the soft connector (modified lower HashinShtrikman bound) is given by the following equations: Φ Φ c K soft = [ K HM μ HM Φ Φ c K mat + 4 ] 4 3 μ 3 μ HM HM Φ Φ c μ soft = [ μ HM ξ μ HM 1 6 ξ HM μ HM, ξ HM = 9K HM + 8μ HM K HM + 2μ HM Φ Φ c μ mat + 4 ] 3 ξ μ HM A  7 A  8 For for any porosity Φ > Φ c the modified upper HashinShtrikman bound, or the stiff connector is given by: Φ Φ c K stiff = [ K HM μ mat Φ Φ c K stiff = [ K HM μ mat ξ = 9K mat + 8μ mat K mat + 2μ mat Φ Φ c K mat + 4 ] 4 3 μ 3 μ mat mat A Φ Φ c K mat + 4 ] 4 3 μ 3 μ mat mat A  10 While density (ρ) is simply the arithmetic average of the various solid and fluid components of the rock (weighted according to their volume fractions) velocity is sensitive (Simm and Bacon 2014). Gassmanns equation (1951) is used to model fluid substitution effects at low seismic frequencies (Mavko et al. 2009). P and Swave velocities are estimated using matrix and fluid properties: and K sat = K dry + (1 K 2 dry ) K mat Φ + 1 Φ K fl K mat K dry 2 K mat A  11 μ sat = μ dry A  12 From the saturatedrock elastic moduli, velocities can be obtained by; 9
10 V P = K sat μ sat, ρ A  13 and V S = μ sat ρ. A  14 REFERENCES Dvorkin, J., Nur, A. and Yin H., Effective properties of cemented granular material: Mechanics of Materials, 18, Dvorkin, J., Gutierrez, M.A., Grana, D., Seismic Reflections of Rock Properties. Cambridge University Press. Gassmann, F., Elasticity of porous media: Uber die elastizitat poroser medien, Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesselschaft, 96, Grana, D. & Della Rossa, E., Probabilistic petrophysicalproperties estimation integrating statistical rock physics with seismic inversion. Geophysics, 75(3), p.o21. Horta, A., & Soares, A., Direct sequential Cosimulation with joint probability distributions. Mathematical Geosciences, 42(3), Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., & Dvorkin, J., The Rock Physics Handbook  Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media (2nd edition). Simm, R., Bacon, M., Seismic Amplitude: An Interpreter s Handbook. Cambridge University Press. Soares, A., Direct Sequential Simulation and Cosimulation. Mathematical Geology, 33(8), Shuey, R. T., 1985, A Simplification of the Zoeppritz equations; Geophysics, Vol. 50, No. 4,
ROCK PHYSICS MODELING FOR LITHOLOGY PREDICTION USING HERTZ MINDLIN THEORY
ROCK PHYSICS MODELING FOR LITHOLOGY PREDICTION USING HERTZ MINDLIN THEORY Ida Ayu PURNAMASARI*, Hilfan KHAIRY, Abdelazis Lotfy ABDELDAYEM Geoscience and Petroleum Engineering Department Universiti Teknologi
More informationReliability of Seismic Data for Hydrocarbon Reservoir Characterization
Reliability of Seismic Data for Hydrocarbon Reservoir Characterization Geetartha Dutta (gdutta@stanford.edu) December 10, 2015 Abstract Seismic data helps in better characterization of hydrocarbon reservoirs.
More informationGRAIN SORTING, POROSITY, AND ELASTICITY. Jack Dvorkin and Mario A. Gutierrez Geophysics Department, Stanford University ABSTRACT
GRAIN SORTING, POROSITY, AND ELASTICITY Jack Dvorkin and Mario A. Gutierrez Geophysics Department, Stanford University July 24, 2001 ABSTRACT Grain size distribution (sorting) is determined by deposition.
More informationStatistical Rock Physics
Statistical  Introduction Book review 3.13.3 Min Sun March. 13, 2009 Outline. What is Statistical. Why we need Statistical. How Statistical works Statistical Rock physics Information theory Statistics
More informationA New AVO Attribute for Hydrocarbon Prediction and Application to the Marmousi II Dataset*
A New AVO Attribute for Hydrocarbon Prediction and Application to the Marmousi II Dataset* Changcheng Liu 1 and Prasad Ghosh 2 Search and Discovery Article #41764 (2016) Posted January 25, 2016 *Adapted
More informationEffects of fluid changes on seismic reflections: Predicting amplitudes at gas reservoir directly from amplitudes at wet reservoir
GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 77, NO. 4 (JULYAUGUST 2012); P. D129 D140, 15 FIGS., 2 TABLES. 10.1190/GEO20110331.1 Effects of fluid changes on seismic reflections: Predicting amplitudes at gas reservoir directly
More informationHeriotWatt University
HeriotWatt University HeriotWatt University Research Gateway 4D seismic feasibility study for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) with CO2 injection in a mature North Sea field Amini, Hamed; Alvarez, Erick Raciel;
More informationStochastic vs Deterministic Prestack Inversion Methods. Brian Russell
Stochastic vs Deterministic Prestack Inversion Methods Brian Russell Introduction Seismic reservoir analysis techniques utilize the fact that seismic amplitudes contain information about the geological
More informationWe Density/Porosity Versus Velocity of Overconsolidated Sands Derived from Experimental Compaction SUMMARY
We 6 Density/Porosity Versus Velocity of Overconsolidated Sands Derived from Experimental Compaction S. Narongsirikul* (University of Oslo), N.H. Mondol (University of Oslo and Norwegian Geotechnical Inst)
More informationGeological Classification of SeismicInversion Data in the Doba Basin of Chad*
Geological Classification of SeismicInversion Data in the Doba Basin of Chad* Carl Reine 1, Chris Szelewski 2, and Chaminda Sandanayake 3 Search and Discovery Article #41899 (2016)** Posted September
More informationQuantitative Interpretation
Quantitative Interpretation The aim of quantitative interpretation (QI) is, through the use of amplitude analysis, to predict lithology and fluid content away from the well bore. This process should make
More informationPreStack Seismic Inversion and Amplitude Versus Angle Modeling Reduces the Risk in Hydrocarbon Prospect Evaluation
Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development Vol. 7, No. 2, 2014, pp. 3039 DOI:10.3968/5170 ISSN 1925542X [Print] ISSN 19255438 [Online] www.cscanada.net www.cscanada.org PreStack Seismic Inversion
More informationShaly Sand Rock Physics Analysis and Seismic Inversion Implication
Shaly Sand Rock Physics Analysis and Seismic Inversion Implication Adi Widyantoro (IkonScience), Matthew Saul (IkonScience/UWA) Rock physics analysis of reservoir elastic properties often assumes homogeneity
More informationRock physics and AVO analysis for lithofacies and pore fluid prediction in a North Sea oil field
Rock physics and AVO analysis for lithofacies and pore fluid prediction in a North Sea oil field Downloaded 09/12/14 to 84.215.159.82. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use
More informationQuantitative Seismic Interpretation An Earth Modeling Perspective
Quantitative Seismic Interpretation An Earth Modeling Perspective Damien Thenin*, RPS, Calgary, AB, Canada TheninD@rpsgroup.com Ron Larson, RPS, Calgary, AB, Canada LarsonR@rpsgroup.com Summary Earth models
More informationA021 Petrophysical Seismic Inversion for Porosity and 4D Calibration on the Troll Field
A021 Petrophysical Seismic Inversion for Porosity and 4D Calibration on the Troll Field T. Coleou* (CGG), A.J. van Wijngaarden (Hydro), A. Norenes Haaland (Hydro), P. Moliere (Hydro), R. Ona (Hydro) &
More informationEvaluation of Rock Properties from Logs Affected by Deep Invasion A Case Study
Evaluation of Rock Properties from Logs Affected by Deep Invasion A Case Study Jahan Zeb a, Reece Murrell b a CGG Australia, 1 Ord Street, West Perth, WA 6005 Contact email: Jahan.Zeb@cgg.com b Esso Australia,
More informationMethane hydrate rock physics models for the Blake Outer Ridge
Stanford Exploration Project, Report 80, May 15, 2001, pages 1 307 Methane hydrate rock physics models for the Blake Outer Ridge Christine Ecker 1 ABSTRACT Seismic analyses of methane hydrate data from
More informationFluidproperty discrimination with AVO: A BiotGassmann perspective
Fluidproperty discrimination with AVO: A BiotGassmann perspective Brian H. Russell, Ken Hedlin 1, Fred J. Hilterman, and Laurence R. Lines ABSTRACT This paper draws together basic rock physics, AVO,
More informationSEISMIC INVERSION OVERVIEW
DHI CONSORTIUM SEISMIC INVERSION OVERVIEW Rocky Roden September 2011 NOTE: Terminology for inversion varies, depending on the different contractors and service providers, emphasis on certain approaches,
More informationRock Physics & Formation Evaluation. Special Topic
Volume 30 Issue 5 May 2012 Special Topic Technical Articles Dual representation of multiscale fracture network modelling for UAE carbonate field AVO and spectral decomposition for derisking Palaeogene
More informationReservoir Characterization using AVO and Seismic Inversion Techniques
P205 Reservoir Characterization using AVO and Summary *Abhinav Kumar Dubey, IIT Kharagpur Reservoir characterization is one of the most important components of seismic data interpretation. Conventional
More informationComparative Study of AVO attributes for Reservoir Facies Discrimination and Porosity Prediction
5th Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, Hyderabad004, India PP 49850 Comparative Study of AVO attributes for Reservoir Facies Discrimination and Porosity Prediction Y. Hanumantha Rao & A.K.
More informationRock Physics and Quantitative Wavelet Estimation. for Seismic Interpretation: Tertiary North Sea. R.W.Simm 1, S.Xu 2 and R.E.
Rock Physics and Quantitative Wavelet Estimation for Seismic Interpretation: Tertiary North Sea R.W.Simm 1, S.Xu 2 and R.E.White 2 1. Enterprise Oil plc, Grand Buildings, Trafalgar Square, London WC2N
More informationRock physics and AVO applications in gas hydrate exploration
Rock physics and AVO applications in gas hydrate exploration ABSTRACT Yong Xu*, Satinder Chopra Core Lab Reservoir Technologies Division, 301,4003rd Ave SW, Calgary, AB, T2P 4H2 yxu@corelab.ca Summary
More informationReservoir properties inversion from AVO attributes
Reservoir properties inversion from AVO attributes Xingang Chi* and Dehua Han, University of Houston Summary A new rock physics model based inversion method is put forward where the shalysand mixture
More informationCrosswell tomography imaging of the permeability structure within a sandstone oil field.
Crosswell tomography imaging of the permeability structure within a sandstone oil field. Tokuo Yamamoto (1), and Junichi Sakakibara (2) (1) University of Miami and Yamamoto Engineering Corporation, (2)
More informationTHE USE OF SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES AND SPECTRAL DECOMPOSITION TO SUPPORT THE DRILLING PLAN OF THE URACOABOMBAL FIELDS
THE USE OF SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES AND SPECTRAL DECOMPOSITION TO SUPPORT THE DRILLING PLAN OF THE URACOABOMBAL FIELDS Cuesta, Julián* 1, Pérez, Richard 1 ; Hernández, Freddy 1 ; Carrasquel, Williams 1 ; Cabrera,
More informationF003 Geomodel Update Using 4D Petrophysical Seismic Inversion on the Troll West Field
F003 Geomodel Update Using 4D Petrophysical Seismic Inversion on the Troll West Field K. Gjerding* (Statoil), N. Skjei (Statoil), A. Norenes Haaland (Statoil), I. Machecler (CGGVeritas Services) & T.
More informationNORGES TEKNISKNATURVITENSKAPELIGE UNIVERSITET. Directional Metropolis Hastings updates for posteriors with nonlinear likelihoods
NORGES TEKNISKNATURVITENSKAPELIGE UNIVERSITET Directional Metropolis Hastings updates for posteriors with nonlinear likelihoods by Håkon Tjelmeland and Jo Eidsvik PREPRINT STATISTICS NO. 5/2004 NORWEGIAN
More informationPorosity prediction using cokriging with multiple secondary datasets
Cokriging with Multiple Attributes Porosity prediction using cokriging with multiple secondary datasets Hong Xu, Jian Sun, Brian Russell, Kris Innanen ABSTRACT The prediction of porosity is essential for
More informationAVO attribute inversion for finely layered reservoirs
GEOPHYSICS, VOL. 71, NO. 3 MAYJUNE 006 ; P. C5 C36, 16 FIGS., TABLES. 10.1190/1.197487 Downloaded 09/1/14 to 84.15.159.8. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/
More informationThe use of seismic attenuation to indicate saturation in hydrocarbon reservoirs: Theoretical study and modelling approach
Available online at www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Advances in Applied Science Research, 2013, 4(2):4553 ISSN: 09768610 CODEN (USA): AASRFC The use of seismic attenuation to indicate saturation in hydrocarbon
More informationKYLE T. SPIKES Research Group
KYLE T. SPIKES Research Group 1 WELCOME TO THE MEETING Welcome everyone! Currently we have 8 PhD and 3 MS students in total Presentations today cover a variety of topics in various stages of development
More informationSummary. Simple model for kerogen maturity (Carcione, 2000)
Malleswar Yenugu* and Dehua Han, University of Houston, USA Summary The conversion of kerogen to oil/gas will build up overpressure. Overpressure is caused by conversion of solid kerogen to fluid hydrocarbons
More informationCHARACTERIZING RESERVOIR PROPERTIES OF THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE USING THE SELFCONSISTENT MODEL AND A GRID SEARCH METHOD.
CHARACTERIZING RESERVOIR PROPERTIES OF THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE USING THE SELFCONSISTENT MODEL AND A GRID SEARCH METHOD Meijuan Jiang Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin ABSTRACT
More informationBayesian lithology/fluid inversion comparison of two algorithms
Comput Geosci () 14:357 367 DOI.07/s59600991559 REVIEW PAPER Bayesian lithology/fluid inversion comparison of two algorithms Marit Ulvmoen Hugo Hammer Received: 2 April 09 / Accepted: 17 August 09 /
More informationLinearized AVO and Poroelasticity for HRS9. Brian Russell, Dan Hampson and David Gray 2011
Linearized AO and oroelasticity for HR9 Brian Russell, Dan Hampson and David Gray 0 Introduction In this talk, we combine the linearized Amplitude ariations with Offset (AO) technique with the BiotGassmann
More informationRESERVOIR SEISMIC CHARACTERISATION OF THIN SANDS IN WEST SYBERIA
www.senergyltd.com RESERVOIR SEISMIC CHARACTERISATION OF THIN SANDS IN WEST SYBERIA Erick Alvarez, Jaume Hernandez, Bolkhotivin E.A., Belov A.V., Hakima Ben Meradi,Jonathan Hall, Olivier Siccardi, Phil
More informationConstraining Uncertainty in Static Reservoir Modeling: A Case Study from Namorado Field, Brazil*
Constraining Uncertainty in Static Reservoir Modeling: A Case Study from Namorado Field, Brazil* Juliana F. Bueno 1, Rodrigo D. Drummond 1, Alexandre C. Vidal 1, Emilson P. Leite 1, and Sérgio S. Sancevero
More informationPetrophysical Study of Shale Properties in Alaska North Slope
Petrophysical Study of Shale Properties in Alaska North Slope Minh Tran Tapan Mukerji Energy Resources Engineering Department Stanford University, CA, USA Region of Interest 1.5 miles 20 miles Stratigraphic
More informationDeterministic and stochastic inversion techniques used to predict porosity: A case study from F3Block
Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2015 Deterministic and stochastic inversion techniques used to predict porosity: A
More informationPartial Saturation Fluid Substitution with Partial Saturation
Fluid Substitution with 261 5 4.5 ρ fluid S w ρ w + S o ρ o + S g ρ g Vp (km/s) 4 3.5 K fluid S w K w + S o K o + S g K g Patchy Saturation Drainage 3 2.5 2 Finescale mixing 1 = S w + S o + S g K fluid
More informationTowards Interactive QI Workflows Laurie Weston Bellman*
Laurie Weston Bellman* Summary Quantitative interpretation (QI) is an analysis approach that is widely applied (Aki and Richards, 1980, Verm and Hilterman, 1995, Avseth et al., 2005, Weston Bellman and
More informationInverting hydraulic heads in an alluvial aquifer constrained with ERT data through MPS and PPM: a case study
Inverting hydraulic heads in an alluvial aquifer constrained with ERT data through MPS and PPM: a case study Hermans T. 1, Scheidt C. 2, Caers J. 2, Nguyen F. 1 1 University of Liege, Applied Geophysics
More informationVELOCITY MODELING TO DETERMINE PORE ASPECT RATIOS OF THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE. Kwon Taek Oh
VELOCITY MODELING TO DETERMINE PORE ASPECT RATIOS OF THE HAYNESVILLE SHALE. Kwon Taek Oh Department of Geological Sciences The University of Texas at Austin ABSTRACT This work estimates pore shapes from
More informationDownloaded 09/16/16 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at
Data Using a Facies Based Bayesian Seismic Inversion, Forties Field, UKCS Kester Waters* (Ikon Science Ltd), Ana Somoza (Ikon Science Ltd), Grant Byerley (Apache Corp), Phil Rose (Apache UK) Summary The
More informationVelocity Measurements of Pore Fluids at Pressure and Temperature: Application to bitumen
Velocity Measurements of Pore Fluids at Pressure and Temperature: Application to bitumen Arif Rabbani 1*, Douglas R Schmitt 1, Jason Nycz 2, and Ken Gray 3 1 Institute for Geophysical Research, Department
More informationInfluence of porosity and pore fluid on acoustic properties of chalk: AVO response from oil, South Arne Field, North Sea
Influence of porosity and pore fluid on acoustic properties of chalk: AVO response from oil, South Arne Field, North Sea Peter Japsen 1, Anders Bruun 2, Ida L. Fabricius 3, Rasmus Rasmussen 1, Ole V. Vejbæk
More informationThe Attribute for Hydrocarbon Prediction Based on Attenuation
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science OPEN ACCESS The Attribute for Hydrocarbon Prediction Based on Attenuation To cite this article: Maman Hermana et al 214 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ.
More informationDerived Rock Attributes Analysis for Enhanced Reservoir Fluid and Lithology Discrimination
IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics (IOSRJAGG) eissn: 2321 0990, pissn: 2321 0982.Volume 5, Issue 2 Ver. I (Mar.  Apr. 2017), PP 95105 www.iosrjournals.org Derived Rock Attributes Analysis
More informationBandlimited impedance inversion: using well logs to fill low frequency information in a nonhomogenous model
Bandlimited impedance inversion: using well logs to fill low frequency information in a nonhomogenous model Heather J.E. Lloyd and Gary F. Margrave ABSTRACT An acoustic bandlimited impedance inversion
More informationJoint inversion of borehole electromagnetic and sonic measurements G. Gao, A. Abubakar, T. M. Habashy, SchlumbergerDoll Research
Joint inversion of borehole electromagnetic and sonic measurements G. Gao, A. Abubakar, T. M. Habashy, SchlumbergerDoll Research SUMMARY Newgeneration electromagnetic (EM) and sonic logging tools are
More informationGEO4270 EXERCISE 2 PROSPECT EVALUATION
GEO4270 EXERCISE 2 PROSPECT EVALUATION GEO4270 Integrated Basin Analysis and Prospect Evaluation 1. Integrated Seismic (reflection/refraction), Gravity and Magnetics and Basin Modelling Large Scale Structures
More informationBest practices predicting unconventional reservoir quality
Introduction Best practices predicting unconventional reservoir quality Cristian Malaver, Michel Kemper, and Jorg Herwanger 1 Unconventional reservoirs have proven challenging for quantitative interpretation
More informationSearch and Discovery Article #42083 (2017)** Posted August 21, 2017
Geophysical Characterization of Carbonate Reservoirs Using Advanced Interpretation Techniques: Applications to Abenaki Formation, Penobscot Block, Nova Scotia* D. Coronel 1, E. Villamizar 1, E. Illidge
More informationAn Overview of the Tapia Canyon Field Static Geocellular Model and Simulation Study
An Overview of the Tapia Canyon Field Static Geocellular Model and Simulation Study Prepared for Sefton Resources Inc. Jennifer Dunn, Chief Geologist Petrel Robertson Consulting Ltd. Outline Background
More informationA E. SEG/San Antonio 2007 Annual Meeting. exp. a V. a V. Summary
Timelapse simulatortoseismic study  Forties field, North Sea. Christophe Ribeiro *, Cyrille Reiser, Philippe Doyen, CGGeritas, London, UK August Lau, Apache Corp., Houston, US, Steve Adiletta, Apache
More informationFacies Classifications for Seismic Inversion
Facies Classifications for Seismic Inversion Jeremy Gallop Ikon Science Canada Summary Identifying facies for classification for a seismic inversion project is an important step where one balances computational
More informationURTeC: Summary
URTeC: 2665754 Using Seismic Inversion to Predict Geomechanical Well Behavior: a Case Study From the Permian Basin Simon S. Payne*, Ikon Science; Jeremy Meyer*, Ikon Science Copyright 2017, Unconventional
More informationSeismic behaviour of CO 2 saturated Fontainebleau sandstone under in situ conditions
Seismic behaviour of CO 2 urated Fontainebleau sandstone under in situ conditions Md Mizanul Huq Chowdhury*, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, mhchowdh@ualberta.ca and Douglas R. Schmitt, University
More informationAVO inversion and Lateral prediction of reservoir properties of Amangi hydrocarbon field of the Niger Delta area of Nigeria
IOSR Journal of Applied Geology and Geophysics (IOSRJAGG) eissn: 2321 0990, pissn: 2321 0982.Volume 2, Issue 2 Ver. II. (MarApr. 2014), PP 0817 AVO inversion and Lateral prediction of reservoir properties
More informationQuantitative Seismic Interpretation using Rock Physics Templates  case examples from the Zumba field
Quantitative Seismic Interpretation using Rock Physics Templates  case examples from the Zumba field Taufik Maulana Petroleum Geosciences Submission date: June 2016 Supervisor: Per Åge Avseth, IPT Norwegian
More informationTo a dynamic update of the Sleipner CO 2 storage geological model using 4D seismic data
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Energy Procedia 37 (2013 ) 4902 4909 GHGT11 To a dynamic update of the Sleipner CO 2 storage geological model using 4D seismic data Alexandre Fornel a, * and
More informationReservoir characterization
1/15 Reservoir characterization This paper gives an overview of the activities in geostatistics for the Petroleum industry in the domain of reservoir characterization. This description has been simplified
More informationPractical aspects of AVO modeling
Practical aspects of AVO modeling YONGYI LI, Paradigm Geophysical, Calgary, Canada JONATHAN DOWNTON, Veritas, Calgary, Canada, YONG XU, Arcis Corporation, Calgary, Canada AVO (amplitude variation with
More informationDATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
III. DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION 3.1. Rift Geometry Identification Based on recent analysis of modern and ancient rifts, many previous workers concluded that the basic structural unit of continental
More informationAVO Attributes of a Deep Coal Seam
AVO Attributes of a Deep Coal Seam Jinfeng Ma* State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University, China jinfengma@sohu.com Igor Morozov University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
More informationQuantifying Bypassed Pay Through 4D PostStack Inversion*
Quantifying Bypassed Pay Through 4D PostStack Inversion* Robert Woock 1, Sean Boerner 2 and James Gamble 1 Search and Discovery Article #40799 (2011) Posted August 12, 2011 *Adapted from oral presentation
More informationEstimation of Elastic Parameters Using TwoTerm Fatti Elastic Impedance Inversion
Journal of Earth Science, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 556 566, August 15 ISSN 1674487X Printed in China DOI:.7/s158155645 Estimation of Elastic Parameters Using TwoTerm Fatti Elastic Impedance Inversion Jin
More informationDownloaded 02/05/15 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at
Relationship among porosity, permeability, electrical and elastic properties Zair Hossain Alan J Cohen RSI, 2600 South Gessner Road, Houston, TX 77063, USA Summary Electrical resisivity is usually easier
More informationStressinduced transverse isotropy in rocks
Stanford Exploration Project, Report 80, May 15, 2001, pages 1 318 Stressinduced transverse isotropy in rocks Lawrence M. Schwartz, 1 William F. Murphy, III, 1 and James G. Berryman 1 ABSTRACT The application
More informationPETROLEUM RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION
PETROLEUM RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION Eliandro Admir da Rocha Marques ABSTRACT The reservoir simulation in the oil industry has become the standard for the solution of engineering problems of reservoirs.
More informationPoisson's Ration, Deep Resistivity and Water Saturation Relationships for Shaly Sand Reservoir, SE Sirt, Murzuq and Gadames Basins, Libya (Case study)
Journal of Geography and Geology; Vol. 7, No. 1; 2015 ISSN 19169779 EISSN 19169787 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Poisson's Ration, Deep Resistivity and Water Saturation Relationships
More informationEffective Medium Theories Effective Medium Models
Effective Medium Models 3 Bounding Methods for Estimating Effective Elastic Moduli For many reasons we would like to be able to model or estimate the effective elastic moduli of rocks in terms of the properties
More informationKOZENYCARMAN EQUATION REVISITED. Jack Dvorkin Abstract
KOZENYCARMAN EQUATION REVISITED Jack Dvorkin  009 Abstract The KozenyCarman equation is often presented as permeability versus porosity, grain size, and tortuosity. When it is used to estimate permeability
More informationEffects of Fracture Parameters in an Anisotropy Model on PWave Azimuthal Amplitude Responses
PROC. ITB Eng. Science Vol. 38 B, No. 2, 2006, 159170 159 Effects of Fracture Parameters in an Anisotropy Model on PWave Azimuthal Amplitude Responses Fatkhan Program Studi Teknik Geofisika FIKTMITB
More information3D Geological Modeling and Uncertainty Analysis of Pilot Pad in the Long Lake Field with Lean Zone and Shale Layer
Datapages/Search and Discovery Article #9224 GeoConvention 214, FOCUS  Adapt, Refine, Sustain Calgary, Alberta, Canada, May 1216, 214 3D Geological Modeling and Uncertainty Analysis of Pilot Pad in the
More informationHeriotWatt University
HeriotWatt University HeriotWatt University Research Gateway Improved normalization of timelapse seismic data using normalized root mean square repeatability data to improve automatic production and
More informationPrinciples of 3D Seismic Interpretation and Applications
Principles of 3D Seismic Interpretation and Applications Instructor: Dominique AMILHON Duration: 5 days Level: IntermediateAdvanced Course Description This course delivers techniques related to practical
More informationThin Sweet Spots Identification in the Duvernay Formation of North Central Alberta*
Thin Sweet Spots Identification in the Duvernay Formation of North Central Alberta* Ritesh K. Sharma 1 and Satinder Chopra 1 Search and Discovery Article #10902 (2017)** Posted January 16, 2017 *Adapted
More informationMULTIFRACTAL ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC DATA FOR DELINEATING RESERVOIR FLUIDS
MULTIFRACTAL ANALYSIS OF SEISMIC DATA FOR DELINEATING RESERVOIR FLUIDS *Maryam Mahsal Khan, *Ahmad Fadzil M.H., **M Firdaus A. H., **Ahmad Riza G. *Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 3175 Tronoh, Perak, Malaysia
More information11282 Rock Physics Analysis and Timelapse Rock Imaging of Geochemical Effects Due to CO2 Injection into Reservoir Rocks
11282 Rock Physics Analysis and Timelapse Rock Imaging of Geochemical Effects Due to CO2 Injection into Reservoir Rocks T.V. Vanorio* (Stanford University) & E.D. Diaz (Ingrain Inc., Houston, TX) SUMMARY
More informationConstraining seismic rockproperty logs in organic shale reservoirs
Constraining seismic rockproperty logs in organic shale reservoirs Malleswar Yenugu 1 and Lev Vernik 2 Abstract One of the major challenges of unconventional shale reservoirs is to understand the effects
More informationImpact of Rock Physics Depth Trends and Markov Random. Fields on Hierarchical Bayesian Lithology/Fluid Prediction.
Impact of Rock Physics Depth Trends and Markov Random Fields on Hierarchical Bayesian Lithology/Fluid Prediction. Kjartan Rimstad 1 & Henning Omre 1 1 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim,
More informationSadewa Field is in Kutei Basin in the Makassar Strait between
SPECIAL Asia SECTION: Pacific A s i a P acific Distinguishing gas sand from shale/brine sand using elastic impedance data and the determination of the lateral extent of channel reservoirs using amplitude
More informationPetrophysical Rock Typing: Enhanced Permeability Prediction and Reservoir Descriptions*
Petrophysical Rock Typing: Enhanced Permeability Prediction and Reservoir Descriptions* Wanida Sritongthae 1 Search and Discovery Article #51265 (2016)** Posted June 20, 2016 *Adapted from oral presentation
More informationResearch  Recent work:
Research  Recent work: Henning Omre  www.math.ntnu.no/~omre Professor in Statistics Department of Mathematical Sciences Norwegian University of Science & Technology Trondheim Norway December 2016 Current
More informationGeologic and Reservoir Characterization and Modeling
Geologic and Reservoir Characterization and Modeling Scott M. Frailey and James Damico Illinois State Geological Survey Midwest Geologic Sequestration Science Conference November 8 th, 2011 Acknowledgements
More informationLog Ties Seismic to Ground Truth
26 GEOPHYSICALCORNER Log Ties Seismic to Ground Truth The Geophysical Corner is a regular column in the EXPLORER, edited by R. Randy Ray. This month s column is the first of a twopart series titled Seismic
More informationTHE INVESTIGATION OF FLUID PROPERTIES AND SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION TERRA E. BULLOCH A THESIS
THE INVESTIGATION OF FLUID PROPERTIES AND SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION By TERRA E. BULLOCH A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF
More informationAcoustic impedance inversion and CO 2 flood detection at the Alder Flats ECBM project
ECBM CO 2 flood detection Acoustic impedance inversion and CO 2 flood detection at the Alder Flats ECBM project Jason M. McCrank and Don C. Lawton ABSTRACT The 3D poststack vertical component data from
More informationDownloaded 11/22/17 to Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at
t Special section: Thin beds Downloaded 11/22/17 to 37.44.193.54. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/ Tuning of flat spots with overlying bright
More informationThe relationship between elasticwave velocities and density in sedimentary rocks: A proposal
260 The relationship between elasticwave velocities and density in sedimentary rocks: A proposal Susan L.M. Miller and Robert R. Stewart ABSTRACT When information about density (0) is unavailable, it
More informationMachine Learning Applied to 3D Reservoir Simulation
Machine Learning Applied to 3D Reservoir Simulation Marco A. Cardoso 1 Introduction The optimization of subsurface flow processes is important for many applications including oil field operations and
More informationGeophysical and geomechanical rock property templates for source rocks Malleswar Yenugu, Ikon Science Americas, USA
Geophysical and geomechanical rock property templates for source rocks Malleswar Yenugu, Ikon Science Americas, USA Summary Sweet spot identification for source rocks involve detection of organic rich,
More informationDetermination of the Laminar, Structural and Disperse Shale Volumes Using a Joint Inversion of Conventional Logs*
Determination of the Laminar, Structural and Disperse Shale Volumes Using a Joint Inversion of Conventional Logs* Ambrosio AquinoLópez 1, Aleksandr Mousatov 1, Mikhail Markov 1, and Elena Kazatchenko
More informationJAPEX s 60 Years Experience Exploring Volcanic Reservoirs in Japan*
Click to view oral presentation (3.00 MB) JAPEX s 60 Years Experience Exploring Volcanic Reservoirs in Japan* Kentaro Takeda 1 and Yasuo Yamada 2 Search and Discovery Article #70297 (2017)** Posted October
More informationNeural Networks Find Meaning In Data
t Neural Networks Find Meaning n Data 1,_ By Brian Russell CALGARYThe ultimate goal of any seismic analysis is to extend reservoir knowledge beyond the wells. Neural networks represent a class of statistical
More informationTitle page for Master s Thesis Faculty of Science and Technology
Study programme/specialization: MSc Petroleum Geosciences Engineering Author: Ushah Ranchod Spring Semester, 2017 Open (Signature of author) Faculty Supervisor: Wiktor Waldemar Weibull External Supervisor:
More information