Public Disclosure Copy

Transcription

1 Public Disclosure Authorized AFRICA Togo Agriculture Global Practice IBRD/IDA Specific Investment Loan FY 2011 Seq No: 10 ARCHIVED on 16-Jan-2016 ISR22410 Implementing Agencies: General Secretariat of Ministry of Agriculture Public Disclosure Authorized Key Dates Key Project Dates Bank Approval Date:12-Apr-2011 Planned Mid Term Review Date:14-Apr-2014 Original Closing Date:15-Dec-2016 Project Development Objectives Effectiveness Date:14-Dec-2011 Actual Mid-Term Review Date:23-Apr-2014 Revised Closing Date:15-Dec-2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The objectives of the Project are to (i) rehabilitate and reinforce productive capacities among targeted beneficiaries across Selected Value Chains, and (ii) foster an enabling environment for the development of the agricultural sector, in the Recipient's territory. Project Beneficiaries (within all five administrative regions of Togo) 1) 60,000 crop farmers 2) 13,000 animal herders 3) 1,600 fish producers 4) 500 fish merchants 5) 650,000 households raising poultry and/or small ruminants will benefit from dedicated animal vaccination campaigns PDO Level Results Indicators 1) Farm output subject to project supported post-harvest value-adding schemes (rice,corn); 2) Increase of crop (coffee, cocoa) and continental fisheries output, and of livestock population (small ruminants, poultry) among project beneficiaries; 3) Rates of PNIASA financial execution (for PASA, PADAT and WAAPP altogether) and; 4) Number of direct beneficiaries. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project Objective? No PHRPDODEL Public Disclosure Authorized Components Name Promotion of strategic food crop, export crop and freshwater fish development:(cost $24.10 M) Recovery of the livestock sub-sector:(cost $14.10 M) Support for capacity building and sector coordination:(cost $15.70 M) Overall Ratings Name Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Satisfactory Satisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Satisfactory Satisfactory 1/16/2016 Page 1 of 15

2 Overall Risk Rating Moderate Moderate Implementation Status and Key Decisions The Agriculture Sector Support Project (PASA) is effective since December 14, The midterm review has been held April 23 to May 3, Disbursements have improved since the June 2015 support mission (current global disbursement rate is about 80% as of December 31, 2015 all sources of funds; i.e. 86% for IDA Grant, 64% for GAFSP Grant and 91% for GFRP Grant). (i) Operational assessment: MAEH staff has displayed an overall satisfactory level of dedication and implication to implement the Project. Most agreed upon actions on roadmaps have been implemented, which allowed further strengthening of MAEP cross-cutting functions (Financial Management, Procurement, M&E, Results Based Management & Accountability). More results are appearing for PASA components (micro projects funded under competitive funds, ESOP collecting and processing higher volume of cereals, aquaculture picking up, increased productivity for livestock...,etc.). (ii) Financial Management (FM): current FM assessment is rated Satisfactory (S). The transfer of financial management skills to the accounting department staff of MAEP by the ICF (international consulting firm, SOFRECO) yielded results and the mission team witnessed the smooth transition as the accounting department staff of MAEH took over with a time to time support from the technical assistance. IFRs have been produced and are timely submitted. There is need to carry on with the internal control mechanisms so as to lower fiduciary risks especially with implementation partners and funded sub-projects. (iii) Procurement (PR): current procurement assessment is rated Moderately Satisfactory (MS). There are still abnormal delays in finalizing bid evaluation reports and concluding procurement processes. The project team was advised to prepare and roll out an action plan to speed up procurement process especially on GAFSP-funded activities. Close monitoring of the procurement plan was also recommended. (iii) Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E): current M&E assessment is rated satisfactory (S). The PASA M&E System is operational. The M&E roadmap prepared has called for the training practice ("learning by doing") for all levels and system partners on the use of these tools, guidelines and framework, and close monitoring of the performance of M&E software is conducted to adjust whenever necessary. As the closing date is near, the M&E team is advised to make all due diligence to prepare data to ease up documentation of project achievements in view of the preparation of completion report and impact assessment. Overall, implementation of project activities has gained momentum and disbursement rates has improved justifying to maintain the overall Satisfactory rating (S). Technical activities are progressively providing tangible results (90,125 direct beneficiaries as compared to 75, 100 end of project target ), including job creation for females and the youth. To keep the momentum, there is need to speed up project implementation of GAFSP-funded activities. 1/16/2016 Page 2 of 15

3 1/16/2016 Page 3 of 15

4 Risks Systematic Operations Risk-rating Tool Risk Category Rating at Approval Previous Rating Current Rating Political and Governance -- Moderate Moderate Macroeconomic -- Moderate Moderate 1/16/2016 Page 4 of 15

5 Sector Strategies and Policies -- Low Low Technical Design of Project or Program -- Low Low Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability -- Moderate Moderate Fiduciary -- Moderate Moderate Environment and Social -- Moderate Moderate Stakeholders -- Moderate Moderate Other Overall -- Moderate Moderate Results Project Development Objective Indicators Rate of PNIASA Financial Execution (Percentage, Custom) Value Direct project beneficiaries (Number, Core) Value Female beneficiaries (Percentage, Core Supplement) Value /16/2016 Page 5 of 15

6 Increase of crop and fisheries output, and of livestock population among project beneficiaries (Number, Custom) Value Date Poultry (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Small Ruminants (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Fish (Tons) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Coffee (tons) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value /16/2016 Page 6 of 15

7 Cocoa (tons) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Farm output subject to project supported post-harvest value-adding schemes. (Metric ton, Custom) Value Date Corn (Metric ton, Custom Breakdown) Value Rice (Metric ton, Custom Breakdown) Value /16/2016 Page 7 of 15

8 Overall Comments Intermediate Results Indicators Farmers adopting improved animal husbandry (Number, Custom) Value Poultry (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Small ruminants (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Date 12-Apr Nov Dec-2016 Farmer's organizations participating in the warrantage scheme (Number, Custom) Value /16/2016 Page 8 of 15

9 Targeted clients who are members of newly created ESOPs (Number, Custom) Value New Or upgraded fish farms (Number, Custom) Value Area regenerated or newly planted (Hectare(Ha), Custom) Value Date May Nov Dec-2016 Coffee (Hectare(Ha), Custom Breakdown) Value Date 11-Apr May Nov Dec /16/2016 Page 9 of 15

10 Cocoa (Hectare(Ha), Custom Breakdown) Value Date 11-Apr May Nov Dec-2016 Animal growers using superior breeding stock (Number, Custom) Value Date May Nov Dec-2016 Small ruminants (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Poultry (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Date 11-Apr May Nov Dec /16/2016 Page 10 of 15

11 Water area covered by new management plans adopted by fishers (Hectare(Ha), Custom) Value Date May Nov Dec-2016 Lake Nangbéto (Hectare(Ha), Custom Breakdown) Value Other water bodies (Hectare(Ha), Custom Breakdown) Value Number of sub-sectoral policies and implementation plans adopted (Number, Custom) Value /16/2016 Page 11 of 15

12 Resultsbased management and accountability system developed and implemented (Percentage, Custom) Value Date 12-Apr Nov Nov Dec-2016 MAEP structures using annual work pland and budgets in line with the RBMAS manual, and submitting activity reports to the Secretariat General in line with the RBMAS manuel (Percentage, Custom Breakdown) Value Date 12-Apr May Nov Dec-2016 Staff in MAEP structures participating in performance agreements in line with the RBMAS manual. (Percentage, Custom Breakdown) Value Date 12-Apr May Nov Dec-2016 Training delivered to MAEP staff (Number, Custom) Value /16/2016 Page 12 of 15

13 RBMAS (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Date 12-Apr May Nov Dec-2016 FM (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Animals Participating in the vaccination campaign (Number, Custom) Value Date May Nov Dec-2016 Poultry (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value /16/2016 Page 13 of 15

14 Small ruminants (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value Overall Comments Data on Financial Performance Disbursements (by loan) Project Loan/Credit/TF Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed Disbursed P IDA-H6640 Effective USD % P TF Closed USD % P TF Effective USD % Key Dates (by loan) Project Loan/Credit/TF Status Approval Date Signing Date Effectiveness Date Orig. Closing Date Rev. Closing Date P IDA-H6640 Effective 12-Apr Apr Dec Dec Dec-2016 P TF Closed 18-Apr Apr Dec May May-2015 P TF Effective 18-Apr Apr Dec Dec Dec-2016 Cumulative Disbursements 1/16/2016 Page 14 of 15

15 Restructuring History There has been no restructuring to date. Related Project(s) There are no related projects. 1/16/2016 Page 15 of 15