CORRIDORS OF FREEDOM Access Management (Ability) Herman Pienaar: Director City Transformation and Spatial Planning

Transcription

1 CORRIDORS OF FREEDOM Access Management (Ability) 2016 Herman Pienaar: Director City Transformation and Spatial Planning

2 PLANNING DEVELOPMENT PROCESS RATHER THAN A PLAN CAPITAL INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT FACILITATION 2 OPERATIONAL & URBAN MANGEMENT

3 FUTURE GAZING 3 No fossil fuel driven private vehicles Car sharing is the dominant form of ownership Space requirement for movement of goods will crowd out private car modes.

4 Movement space is a public space 4

5 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK SPATIAL INEQUALITY ANS THE JOB HOUSING MISMATCH 3% of the metropolitan area hosts 1/3 of the jobs 5% of the metropolitan area hosts 1/3 of the inhabitants jobs/km² jobs/km² jobs/km² jobs/km² jobs/km² jobs/km² jobs/km²

6 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK DEPRIVATION, INEQUALITY & THE GEOGRAPHY OF POVERTY DIEPSLOOT COSMO CITY ALEX IVORY PARK SOWETO ORANGE FARM INNER CITY BASED ON 5 INDICATORS: Income Employment the areas with the highest population concentrations are the most deprived areas in the City Health Education Living Environment

7 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK SPATIAL DISCONNECTION AND LIMITED WALKABILITY 93% of the metropolitan area falls below the 100 intersections/km 2 Connectivity benchmark to support walkability INTERSECTION DENSITY

8 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK LAND USE DIVERSITY Limited diversity and inefficient land use patterns The lack of land use diversity is even more critical in deprived areas where we find mostly residential land uses

9 New York 28% 24% 23% 25% With current residential density levels, only 11% of the people will live less than 1km from transit 18% 83% London 22% 29% 31% Joburg now 7% 5% 6% 16% Copenhagen 27% 32% 25%

10 DRAFT COMPACT SPATIAL POLYCENTRIC DEVELOPMENT CITY IN FRAMEWORK PEOPLE % of the people living less than 1km from transit, compared to only 11% today. 64% living less than 2km from transit, compared to only 18% today 83% 35% Joburg now 7% 5% Joburg % 15% 6% 11%

11 DRAFT SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK COMPACT POLYCENTRIC CITY IN JOBS 33% of the jobs located less than 1km from transit, compared to 10% today. 80% of the jobs less than 2km from transit, compared to 17% today 83% 20% Joburg now 7% 5% Joburg % 47% 5% 14%

12 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK THE POLYCENTRIC CITY Traditional urban growth model

13 Joburg Structure: Inverted Polycentric Model 13 Urban inefficiency = high carbon emissions

14 Future Joburg Model: Compact Polycentric 14 Opportunities to create low carbon restructuring zones: Modal Density Job Density Social Density Residential Density

15 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

16 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CAPITAL INVESTMENT FOCUS Use Development Layers in Prioritising investment and managing growth in the city. These will be the primary layers in JSIP.

17 Priority Development Areas and Integration Zones 17 Louis Botha Empire-Perth Turffontein Soweto 17

18 Empire Perth Corridor Densification for Urban Efficiency and Value Increase Louis Botha Corridor 18 Turffontein Corridor COMBINE Transport (modal) density Public (social) density Economic (job) density Residential (people) density CREATE Quality urban environments =Sustainability with increased social and economic value

19 DENSITY IN PERSPECTIVE 19

20 PLANNING 20 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY CORRIDORS OF FREEDOM

21 SOME CONCEPTS 21

22 SOME CONCEPTS 22

23 FINE-GRAINED PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 23

24 PARKING BEHIND OR BELOW BUILDINGS 24

25 CLEAR CONTINIOUS PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 25

26 BUILDING COMPLETE STREETS 26

27 CORRIDORS OF FREEDOM Empire Perth Corridor Movement Transformation Significant reduction in carbon emissions NMT system Short distance fleet last mile Complete streets - New standards required Innovative solutions for constrained urban spaces

28 CORRIDORS OF FREEDOM Approach: Links & Connectivity Rational of Transit Oriented Development (T.O.D.) An approach to development that focuses land uses around a transit station or within a transit corridor Typically characterized by: A mix of uses - significant provision for public or civic spaces and comprising a mix of residential, employment, and retail activities Moderate to higher density Pedestrian orientation/connectivity Transportation choices Extensive provision for pedestrian and cycling movement Reduced parking A road network laid out in the form of a topologically open grid Extends to an easy walking distance radius of m 28

29 Walkability Analysis 29 Spatial influenced effected by a range of factors, including erf size, intersection density, street configuration, etc.

30 Economic Transformation 30 Empire Perth Corridor Breaking market monopolies and improving access to economic opportunities Supply chain monopolies Access to capital Accommodating informality (second economy) Stimulate new economic clustering and innovation Bring factors of production and innovation together in high efficiency hubs Broker the deal between land owners, developers, business and industry Special purpose vehicle Spatial response Create urban efficiencies and quality public environments Division of land and design principles No shopping centres?

31 Social Transformation 31 Empire Perth Corridor Westdene Dam Peter Roos Westbury Brixton Pennyville Noordgesig Quality public spaces A prerequisite for social cohesion Activation of spaces Efficiency of social facilities New standards required in response to high density environments High Density Schools Sharing of facilities Sport, Libraries Clustering of services and amenities Operational service levels Inclusive design Safety and universal access Inclusive housing options

32 Densification 32 Empire Perth Corridor Along BRT and Proposed complementary route Inclusionary housing requirements

33 How Will Densification Occur Densification Opportunities 33

34 A Framework For Intervention 34 Empire Perth Corridor

35 GRANT AVENUE/PATTERSON PARK DEVELOPMENT 35

36 CoJ/JDA Grant Avenue Precinct Plan 2016

37 GRANT AVENUE PRECINCT PLAN UDF- Walkability Walkability 400m: 5minutes easy walkable distance Permeability /ese of access is facilitated by: Streets network Regular Blocks Supporting Built form CoJ/JDA Grant Avenue Precinct Plan 2016

38 GRANT AVENUE PRECINCT PLAN Precinct Plan - Neighbourhood Clusters Neighbourhood Clusters Neighbourhood Anchors: Community Centre Southern Gateway Norwood Park and Square Norwood Primary School BRT Stations CoJ/JDA Grant Avenue Precinct Plan 2016

39 GRANT AVENUE PRECINCT PLAN UDF- Sense of Place Sense of Place Legibility Connectivity Character Diversity Continuity/Enclosure Ease of Movement Adaptability Quality Public Realm CoJ/JDA Grant Avenue Precinct Plan 2016

40 GRANT AVENUE PRECINCT PLAN Precinct Plan - Vision Vision To create a well connected, urban, diverse and vibrant neighbourhood supported by a well performing rich and varied high-street benefitting from its proximity to integrated community facilities and served by a convenient public transport. network CoJ/JDA Grant Avenue Precinct Plan 2016

41 GRANT AVENUE PRECINCT PLAN Cross Sections CoJ/JDA Grant Avenue Precinct Plan 2016

42 42

43 Site = 2.9ha Density = 210/ha Units = 625 Avg size = 50m²

44 Westbury

45 45 ACCESS TO THE CITY bit.ly/jhbsdf2016