2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 1
|
|
- Charleen Andrews
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 1 CPB Systemic Seed/In-Furrow Trial Hancock, Wisconsin, USA, 2018 Russell Groves, Scott Chapman, Ben Bradford, Linda Crubaugh Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison Purpose. This trial was conducted to evaluate the crop protection performance of several rates of two experimental systemic insecticides applied as either seed treatments or at-plant in-furrow sprays relative to commercial standards and an untreated control. An equivalent trial was conducted at Arlington, WI. Experimental design. This experiment was conducted at the Hancock Agricultural Research Station (HARS), located 1.1 miles southwest of Hancock, WI, in field E-12 ( , ) in Soil was of a loamy sand type ( Plainfield Sand ). Four replicates of 14 experimental treatments and 1 untreated control were arranged in a randomized complete block design. Furrows were cut using a commercial potato planter without closing discs attached. Potato, Solanum tuberosum cv. Russet Burbank seed pieces were hand planted on May 3 rd. Seed pieces were spaced approximately 12 inches apart within rows. Rows were spaced on 3 ft. centers. The four-row plots measured 12 ft. wide by 40 ft. long, for a total of acres. One untreated guard row separated plots. Treatments. This trial consists of a combination of seed treatment and in-furrow applications of fungicides and insecticides intended to provide season-long protection against disease and insect pest pressure. All seed with the exception of the untreated control received a seed treatment of the fungicide Maxim 4 FS at a rate of 0.08 fl oz/cwt seed. Insecticide treatments consisted seed or in-furrow applications of the commercial standards Belay and Verimark, and the experimental compounds EXP-1 and EXP-2. See Table 1 for additional treatment information. Insect counts. Colorado Potato Beetle (CPB), Leptinotarsa decemlineata, populations were assessed on 10 randomly selected plants in each plot for adults, small larvae (1 st -2 nd instars), and large larvae (3 rd -4 th instars). Egg masses were counted on 25 leaves. Potato Leafhopper (PLH), Empoasca fabae, adults were sampled using sweep net techniques (15 sweeps per plot). PLH nymphs and aphids were assessed by visual inspection of 25 leaves per plot. Insect counts were performed weekly from week Plant health. Stand counts were conducted by counting the number of emerged plants in each of the two center rows in each plot. Stand counts were performed on Jun 6 and Jun 26 (week 6 and 9). All treatments achieved at least 70% emergence (range 72% - 86%). Phytotoxicity was scouted on Jun 15 and Jun 22 and some chlorosis was noted on several treatments with the most notable damage on treatments 4, 11, and 15 though plants recovered later in the season. Defoliation ratings (% DF) were determined by visual observation of the entire plot and were performed weekly from week Harvest. A single 40 ft.-long row from the center of each plot was harvested on Aug 20 (17 weeks after planting) to determine yield and tuber quality. Tubers were graded using an AgRay Vision X-Ray grading machine which generated electronic measurements of tuber size and weight. The second-largest value of a tuber s dimension in the X, Y, and Z directions was considered its diameter and compared against the following USDA classification scheme: A-size tubers are larger than in diameter, B-size tubers fall between and 1.5, and C-size tubers fall below 1.5 diameter. Data analysis. Insect count data was log transformed (log(xx + 1)) and percentages were arcsine square root transformed (sin 1 xx) prior to analysis. Treatment effects were determined using analysis of variance. Means separation letter codes were generated using Tukey s HSD procedure (α=.05).
2 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 2 Table of Contents Table 1. Treatment detail... 3 Figure 1. Plot Map (not to scale)... 3 Table 2. Plot management record... 4 Table 3. Irrigation and precipitation record... 5 Table 4. Colorado Potato Beetle Adult Counts... 6 Table 5. Colorado Potato Beetle Egg Mass Counts... 7 Table 6. Colorado Potato Beetle Small Larvae Counts... 8 Table 7. Colorado Potato Beetle Large Larvae Counts... 9 Table 8. Potato Leafhopper Adult Counts Table 9. Potato Leafhopper Nymph Counts Table 10. Aphid Counts Table 11a-b. Mean cumulative insect counts Figure 2. Cumulative CPB Adults Figure 3. Cumulative CPB Egg Masses Figure 4. Cumulative CPB Small Larvae Figure 5. Cumulative CPB Large Larvae Figure 6. Cumulative PLH Adult Counts Figure 7. Cumulative PLH Nymph Counts Figure 8. Cumulative Aphid Counts Table 12. Defoliation Ratings Figure 9. Defoliation Ratings Table 13. Yield and Tuber Quality Figure 10. Yield... 20
3 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 3 Table 1. Treatment detail Trt Product Form Unit Type Placement Rate Unit 1 UNTREATED 2 Belay 2.13 lb/gal SC In-furrow 12 fl oz/a 3 Belay 2.13 lb/gal SC Seed 0.5 fl oz/cwt 4 Verimark 1.67 lb/gal SC Seed 0.7 fl oz/cwt 5 Verimark 1.67 lb/gal SC In-furrow 13 fl oz/a 6 EXP-1 SC In-furrow Low 7 EXP-1 SC In-furrow Med 8 EXP-1 SC In-furrow High 9 EXP-1 SC Seed Low 10 EXP-1 SC Seed Med 11 EXP-1 SC Seed High 12 EXP-2 SC In-furrow Low 13 EXP-2 SC In-furrow High 14 EXP-2 SC Seed Low 15 EXP-2 SC Seed High All non-control treatments additionally received a seed treatment of Maxim 4 FS at 0.08 fl oz/cwt Figure 1. Plot Map (not to scale) N 16 rows (48') Spray Alley (12') 16 rows (48') ' 40' ' ' ' ' ' 40' ' ' 40' 40' '
4 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 4 Table 2. Plot management record Date Equipment Product Type Rate Unit 04/25/2018 Airflow Fertilizer Applicator S-21Ca, Calcium Sulfate FERT 500 lb / acre 04/25/2018 Airflow Fertilizer Applicator Potash FERT 450 lb / acre 04/26/2018 Airflow Fertilizer Applicator MAP FERT 200 lb / acre 05/03/2018 Soil Finisher, Brillion 05/03/2018 Potato Planter - Kverneland S+micros FERT 550 lb / acre 05/03/2018 Hiller, Row Closer 05/18/2018 Spray Coupe Parallel HERB 1 pints / acre 05/18/2018 Spray Coupe Metribuzin 75 Dry Flowable HERB 0.5 lb / acre 05/18/2018 Hiller/Sidedresser S Ammonium Sulfate FERT 360 lb / acre 05/18/2018 Hiller/Sidedresser IrrigAid Gold 0.5 pints / acre 06/06/2018 Airflow Fertilizer Applicator Ammonium Nitrate FERT 350 lb / acre 06/11/2018 Spray Coupe Matrix HERB 1.5 dry oz. / acre 06/11/2018 Spray Coupe Non Ionic Surfactant 80/20 ADJ 1 pints / acre 06/15/2018 Spray Coupe Penncozeb 75DF FUNG 2 lb / acre 06/22/2018 Spray Coupe Initiate 720 FUNG 1.5 pints / acre 06/28/2018 Airflow Fertilizer Applicator Ammonium Nitrate FERT 150 lb / acre 06/29/2018 Spray Coupe Tanos FUNG 8 dry oz. / acre 06/29/2018 Spray Coupe Initiate 720 FUNG 1.5 pints / acre 07/02/2018 Spray Coupe Besiege INSE 9 fluid oz / acre 07/02/2018 Spray Coupe MSO ADJ 4 fluid oz / acre 07/05/2018 Spray Coupe Initiate 720 FUNG 1.5 pints / acre 07/11/2018 Spray Coupe Besiege INSE 7 fluid oz / acre 07/11/2018 Spray Coupe MSO ADJ 8 fluid oz / acre 07/13/2018 Spray Coupe Initiate 720 FUNG 1.5 pints / acre 07/13/2018 Spray Coupe Headline FUNG 12 fluid oz / acre 07/21/2018 Spray Coupe Initiate 720 FUNG 1.5 pints / acre 07/26/2018 Spray Coupe Besiege INSE 6 fluid oz / acre 07/26/2018 Spray Coupe Initiate 720 FUNG 1.5 pints / acre 07/26/2018 Spray Coupe Revus Top FUNG 7 fluid oz / acre 07/26/2018 Spray Coupe MSO ADJ 8 fluid oz / acre 08/02/2018 Spray Coupe Initiate 720 FUNG 1.5 pints / acre 08/08/2018 Spray Coupe Diquat E HERB 1.5 pints / acre 08/08/2018 Spray Coupe Non Ionic Surfactant 80/20 ADJ 1 pints / acre 08/10/2018 Spray Coupe Penncozeb 75DF FUNG 1.5 lb / acre 08/13/2018 Spray Coupe Diquat E HERB 1.5 pints / acre 08/13/2018 Spray Coupe Non Ionic Surfactant 80/20 ADJ 1 pints / acre 08/20/2018 Potato Digger, Blue
5 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 5 Table 3. Irrigation and precipitation record Month Day Precip. (in) Irrig. (in) Total Run. Total Apr May Month Day Precip. Irrig. Total Run. (in) (in) Total Jun Jul Month Day Precip. Irrig. Total Run. (in) (in) Total Aug Grand Total
6 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 6 Table 4. Colorado Potato Beetle Adult Counts Trt Product 13-Jun (wk 7) 22-Jun (wk 8) 28-Jun (wk 9) 10-Jul (wk 11) 16-Jul (wk 12) 25-Jul (wk 13) 03-Aug (wk 14) Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED 6.75 ± 4.35 a 1.75 ± 2.22 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a ± c ± c ± c ± 9.04 a 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) 4.25 ± 0.96 a ± c 2.75 ± 1.50 a 7.25 ± 6.85 ab ± abc ± bc ± a 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) 4.50 ± 1.29 a 7.50 ± 2.52 bc 2.50 ± 2.08 a 7.75 ± 5.91 ab ± abc ± c ± a 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) 8.50 ± 5.80 a 4.50 ± 5.20 abc 0.75 ± 0.96 a ± 8.73.b ± bc ± bc ± a 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) 5.50 ± 2.38 a 9.75 ± 5.56.bc 1.50 ± 1.00 a 6.75 ± 2.75 ab ± 7.41 ab ± abc ± a 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) 3.00 ± 2.58 a 2.25 ± 2.06 abc 3.00 ± 1.83 a 3.25 ± 4.03 ab ± ab ± abc ± a 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) 3.00 ± 1.83 a 2.50 ± 1.73 abc 1.00 ± 1.15 a 3.25 ± 1.71 ab ± abc ± abc ± a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) 2.50 ± 2.38 a 1.00 ± 1.41 a 1.00 ± 1.41 a 1.75 ± 1.50 a 8.25 ± 8.54 a ± ab ± a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) 2.50 ± 1.00 a 6.00 ± 4.08 abc 1.50 ± 0.58 a ± ab ± abc ± bc ± a 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) 2.25 ± 0.96 a 2.00 ± 1.83 abc 2.00 ± 1.41 a 3.00 ± 3.16 ab ± abc ± c ± a 11 EXP-1 ST (High) 2.50 ± 0.58 a 2.50 ± 1.73 abc 1.50 ± 1.00 a 4.00 ± 2.16 ab 9.00 ± 6.27 a ± bc ± a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) 2.00 ± 1.83 a 3.00 ± 0.82 abc 2.25 ± 0.96 a 4.00 ± 4.08 ab ± ab ± abc ± a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) 2.75 ± 2.75 a 1.00 ± 1.41 a 2.00 ± 1.63 a 1.75 ± 0.50 a 9.25 ± 5.97 ab ± abc ± a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) 2.25 ± 1.89 a 3.25 ± 2.75 abc 0.75 ± 0.50 a 5.75 ± 3.86 ab ± 6.22 ab ± c ± a 15 EXP-2 ST (High) 4.25 ± 1.26 a 1.75 ± 2.22 ab 0.75 ± 0.50 a 4.50 ± 4.20 ab ± ab ± 3.40 a ± a P = n.s n.s. < n.s. Adult counts are reported per 10 plants. See week 8 counts for 1 st generation adult performance, see weeks for 2 nd generation adult performance. Means followed by same letter code are not significantly different (Tukey s HSD, α=.05)
7 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 7 Table 5. Colorado Potato Beetle Egg Mass Counts Trt Product 13-Jun (wk 7) 22-Jun (wk 8) 28-Jun (wk 9) 10-Jul (wk 11) 16-Jul (wk 12) 25-Jul (wk 13) 03-Aug (wk 14) Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED 8.75 ± cd 1.00 ± 2.00 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) 3.00 ± 2.31 abcd 3.75 ± 5.19 abc 2.25 ± 2.87 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) 6.00 ± 3.46.bcd 4.25 ± 3.20.bc 2.50 ± 1.29 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 1.00 ± 0.82 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) ± d 2.25 ± 0.96 abc 1.00 ± 0.82 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) 7.25 ± cd 7.50 ± c 1.25 ± 1.26 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) 1.75 ± 0.96 abc 4.25 ± 2.50.bc 2.50 ± 2.38 a 1.25 ± 1.26 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) 1.75 ± 2.06 abc 2.75 ± 2.06 abc 1.50 ± 1.29 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) 1.50 ± 1.73 abc 0.25 ± 0.50 ab 1.25 ± 1.26 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) 1.00 ± 1.41 ab 3.50 ± 2.38 abc 1.50 ± 0.58 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) 1.50 ± 2.38 abc 3.50 ± 3.70 abc 2.00 ± 1.41 a 1.25 ± 1.26 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 11 EXP-1 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 0.50 ab 0.75 ± 0.96 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) 1.25 ± 1.26 abc 6.00 ± 9.35 abc 1.25 ± 0.96 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.75 ± 0.96 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) 1.50 ± 3.00 ab 0.00 ± 0.00 a 2.00 ± 2.83 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 15 EXP-2 ST (High) 0.50 ± 0.58 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 ab 1.50 ± 1.29 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a P = <.0001 <.0001 n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. Egg mass counts are reported as number per 25 leaves. Means followed by same letter code are not significantly different (Tukey s HSD, α=.05)
8 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 8 Table 6. Colorado Potato Beetle Small Larvae Counts 13-Jun (wk 7) 22-Jun (wk 8) 28-Jun (wk 9) 10-Jul (wk 11) 16-Jul (wk 12) 25-Jul (wk 13) 03-Aug (wk 14) Trt Product Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED ± b ± c ± de 1.75 ± 2.87 ab 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 3.25 ± 3.30 ab ± bcde 2.50 ± 1.00.b 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) 0.00 ± 0.00 a ± ab ± cde 1.25 ± 1.26 ab 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) 0.50 ± 1.00 a ± c ± e 1.50 ± 3.00 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) 0.00 ± 0.00 a ± bc ± de 1.25 ± 1.89 ab 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a 8.00 ± abc 0.75 ± 0.50 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 4.75 ± 9.50 ab 7.00 ± 4.83 abcd 2.75 ± 4.27 ab 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 3.25 ± 5.85 ab 1.75 ± 1.50 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 11 EXP-1 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 ab 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) 0.25 ± 0.50 a 2.50 ± 5.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 ab 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.00 ± 2.00 a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 7.75 ± abc 1.00 ± 2.00 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 15 EXP-2 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a P = <.0001 <.0001 < n.s. n.s. n.s. Small larvae counts are reported as number per 10 plants. Means followed by same letter code are not significantly different (Tukey s HSD, α=.05)
9 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 9 Table 7. Colorado Potato Beetle Large Larvae Counts 13-Jun (wk 7) 22-Jun (wk 8) 28-Jun (wk 9) 10-Jul (wk 11) 16-Jul (wk 12) 25-Jul (wk 13) 03-Aug (wk 14) Trt Product Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED 0.00 ± 0.00 a ± c ± d 6.75 ± c 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 1.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 5.75 ± 4.99.bc 3.25 ± 1.50.bc 1.00 ± 1.15 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.00 ± 2.00 a ± c 7.00 ± c 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) 0.00 ± 0.00 a ± b ± d 4.25 ± c 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 2.50 ± 3.00 a ± c 6.25 ± c 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 3.75 ± 4.11 ab 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a ± bc 1.75 ± 1.50 abc 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 11 EXP-1 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 0.96 abc 0.75 ± 0.96 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 15 EXP-2 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a P = n.s. <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 n.s. n.s. n.s. Large larvae counts are reported as number per 10 plants. Means followed by same letter code are not significantly different (Tukey s HSD, α=.05)
10 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 10 Table 8. Potato Leafhopper Adult Counts 13-Jun (wk 7) 22-Jun (wk 8) 28-Jun (wk 9) 10-Jul (wk 11) 16-Jul (wk 12) 25-Jul (wk 13) 03-Aug (wk 14) Trt Product Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED 0.25 ± 0.50 a 1.75 ± 0.96 ab 3.00 ± 3.16 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 1.25 ± 1.26 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) 0.25 ± 0.50 a 1.25 ± 1.89 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) 0.25 ± 0.50 a 3.25 ± 2.06 ab 2.25 ± 1.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) 0.50 ± 0.58 a 7.25 ± 8.50.b 3.75 ± 2.22 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) 0.75 ± 1.50 a 2.50 ± 2.89 ab 1.75 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) 1.00 ± 0.82 a 1.25 ± 1.89 ab 1.50 ± 1.29 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) 0.25 ± 0.50 a 2.25 ± 1.89 ab 2.00 ± 1.83 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) 0.25 ± 0.50 a 4.00 ± 2.94 ab 1.50 ± 1.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) 0.25 ± 0.50 a 2.75 ± 2.36 ab 2.75 ± 2.22 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 11 EXP-1 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.50 ± 0.58 ab 1.75 ± 0.96 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) 0.50 ± 0.58 a 1.50 ± 1.00 ab 2.75 ± 2.36 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 1.75 ± 2.36 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) 0.25 ± 0.50 a 1.50 ± 1.00 ab 2.75 ± 2.06 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 15 EXP-2 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 2.00 ± 1.83 ab 2.50 ± 2.65 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a P = n.s n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. Adult counts are reported as number per 15 canopy sweeps. Means followed by same letter code are not significantly different (Tukey s HSD, α=.05)
11 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 11 Table 9. Potato Leafhopper Nymph Counts 13-Jun (wk 7) 22-Jun (wk 8) 28-Jun (wk 9) 10-Jul (wk 11) 16-Jul (wk 12) 25-Jul (wk 13) 03-Aug (wk 14) Trt Product Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 2.75 ± 3.59.b 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.75 ± 2.36 ab 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.75 ± 0.96 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.75 ± 1.50 a 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.75 ± 2.06 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.25 ± 2.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 ab 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.75 ± 1.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 11 EXP-1 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.00 ± 1.41 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.25 ± 1.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 ab 0.50 ± 1.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 15 EXP-2 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a P = n.s. n.s n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. a. Nymph counts are reported as number per 25 leaves b. Means followed by same letter code are not significantly different (Tukey s HSD, α=.05)
12 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 12 Table 10. Aphid Counts Trt Product 13-Jun (wk 7) 22-Jun (wk 8) 28-Jun (wk 9) 10-Jul (wk 11) 16-Jul (wk 12) 25-Jul (wk 13) 03-Aug (wk 14) Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 1.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 1.50 a 3.25 ± 5.85 a ± a 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.50 ± 1.29 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a ± a ± a 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.50 ± 0.58 a 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 2.00 ± 2.45 a 5.50 ± 3.42 a 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 3.50 ± 6.35 a 6.00 ± 5.72 a 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.00 ± 2.00 a 3.50 ± 2.52 a 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.50 ± 2.38 a 4.75 ± 8.85 a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.00 ± 2.00 a 3.25 ± 2.63 a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.75 ± 0.50 a 1.50 ± 1.91 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.50 ± 1.91 a 5.33 ± 2.08 a 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 1.00 ± 1.15 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 2.25 ± 2.63 a 5.00 ± 3.74 a 11 EXP-1 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 1.00 ± 1.41 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.50 ± 1.29 a 3.25 ± 3.20 a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 1.25 ± 1.89 a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 3.25 ± 2.99 a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 3.25 ± 4.27 a 5.75 ± 6.18 a 15 EXP-2 ST (High) 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.50 ± 1.00 a 1.75 ± 2.87 a P = n.s. n.s. n.s n.s. n.s. n.s. a. Aphid counts are reported as number per 25 leaves b. Means followed by same letter code are not significantly different (Tukey s HSD, α=.05)
13 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 13 Table 11a-b. Mean cumulative insect counts Trt Product CPB Adults CPB Egg Masses CPB Small Larvae CPB Large Larvae Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED ± d ± 6.06 abcdef ± f ± e 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) ± cd ± 5.56.bcdef ± bcde ± cd 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) ± bcd ± def ± cdef ± d 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) ± cd ± f ± ef ± e 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) ± abc ± ef ± def ± d 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) ± abc ± cdef ± abc 4.50 ± 3.70.bc 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) ± abc 7.00 ± 3.74 abcdef 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) ± a 3.50 ± 1.73 abcd 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) ± abcd 7.00 ± 3.56 abcdef ± bcd ± cd 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) ± abcd 9.25 ± 3.95.bcdef 5.25 ± 6.08 ab 0.50 ± 0.58 ab 11 EXP-1 ST (High) ± abc 2.25 ± 0.96 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) ± abc 9.50 ± 7.68 abcdef 0.25 ± 0.50 a 0.00 ± 0.00 a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) ± abc 2.50 ± 3.00 a 4.00 ± 4.55 ab 0.00 ± 0.00 a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) ± abcd 5.00 ± 3.65 abcde 9.25 ± ab 1.75 ± 1.26 ab 15 EXP-2 ST (High) ± ab 2.75 ± 1.26 abc 0.00 ± 0.00 a 0.25 ± 0.50 a P = <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 Trt Product PLH Adults PLH Nymphs Aphids Final Defoliation Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED 5.75 ± 3.86 abc 3.25 ± 3.40 a ± a 66% ± 7%.b 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) 2.00 ± 1.83 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a ± a 11% ± 16% a 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) 2.00 ± 2.16 a 0.75 ± 0.96 a 1.00 ± 0.00 a 5% ± 2% a 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) 5.75 ± 2.50 abc 2.50 ± 1.73 a 8.00 ± 4.69 a 19% ± 21% a 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) ± c 2.25 ± 0.50 a 9.50 ± a 3% ± 1% a 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) 5.25 ± 4.65 abc 3.00 ± 3.83 a 4.75 ± 2.63 a 3% ± 1% a 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) 4.50 ± 0.58 abc 0.75 ± 0.96 a 6.75 ± 9.43 a 2% ± 1% a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) 4.75 ± 3.50 abc 0.00 ± 0.00 a 4.50 ± 5.07 a 3% ± 2% a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) 6.25 ± 3.30 abc 0.50 ± 0.58 a 7.75 ± 2.99 a 26% ± 46% a 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) 6.75 ± 3.86.bc 1.00 ± 1.41 a 8.50 ± 6.45 a 6% ± 6% a 11 EXP-1 ST (High) 3.50 ± 1.73 ab 0.25 ± 0.50 a 6.25 ± 5.38 a 2% ± 1% a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) 4.75 ± 2.75 abc 0.00 ± 0.00 a 1.75 ± 2.22 a 18% ± 31% a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) 2.25 ± 2.22 ab 1.00 ± 1.41 a 4.00 ± 2.45 a 2% ± 1% a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) 4.75 ± 2.50 abc 2.75 ± 2.22 a 9.75 ± a 3% ± 2% a 15 EXP-2 ST (High) 5.25 ± 2.87 abc 0.25 ± 0.50 a 2.50 ± 2.38 a 2% ± 1% a P = < n.s. <.0001 Season-long plot totals were averaged to produce these summaries. Means followed by same letter codes are not significantly different (Tukey s HSD, α=0.05)
14 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg Figure 2. Cumulative CPB Adults CPB adults / 10 plants UTC Belay IF Belay ST Verimark ST Verimark IF EXP-1 IF (Low) EXP-1 IF (Med) EXP-1 IF (High) EXP-1 ST (Low) EXP-1 ST (Med) EXP-1 ST (High) EXP-2 IF (Low) EXP-2 IF (High) EXP-2 ST (Low) EXP-2 ST (High) Figure 3. Cumulative CPB Egg Masses CPB egg masses / 10 plants UTC Belay IF Belay ST Verimark ST Verimark IF EXP-1 IF (Low) EXP-1 IF (Med) EXP-1 IF (High) EXP-1 ST (Low) EXP-1 ST (Med) EXP-1 ST (High) EXP-2 IF (Low) EXP-2 IF (High) EXP-2 ST (Low) EXP-2 ST (High)
15 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg Figure 4. Cumulative CPB Small Larvae UTC Belay IF Belay ST Verimark ST Verimark IF EXP-1 IF (Low) EXP-1 IF (Med) EXP-1 IF (High) EXP-1 ST (Low) EXP-1 ST (Med) EXP-1 ST (High) EXP-2 IF (Low) EXP-2 IF (High) EXP-2 ST (Low) EXP-2 ST (High) CPB small larvae / 10 plants (log scale) Figure 5. Cumulative CPB Large Larvae 1024 CPB large larvae / 10 plants (log scale) UTC Belay IF Belay ST Verimark ST Verimark IF EXP-1 IF (Low) EXP-1 IF (Med) EXP-1 IF (High) EXP-1 ST (Low) EXP-1 ST (Med) EXP-1 ST (High) EXP-2 IF (Low) EXP-2 IF (High) EXP-2 ST (Low) EXP-2 ST (High)
16 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg Figure 6. Cumulative PLH Adult Counts 16 PLH adults / 15 sweeps UTC Belay IF Belay ST Verimark ST Verimark IF EXP-1 IF (Low) EXP-1 IF (Med) EXP-1 IF (High) EXP-1 ST (Low) EXP-1 ST (Med) EXP-1 ST (High) EXP-2 IF (Low) EXP-2 IF (High) EXP-2 ST (Low) EXP-2 ST (High) Figure 7. Cumulative PLH Nymph Counts 8 7 PLH nymphs / 25 leaves UTC Belay IF Belay ST Verimark ST Verimark IF EXP-1 IF (Low) EXP-1 IF (Med) EXP-1 IF (High) EXP-1 ST (Low) EXP-1 ST (Med) EXP-1 ST (High) EXP-2 IF (Low) EXP-2 IF (High) EXP-2 ST (Low) EXP-2 ST (High)
17 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg Figure 8. Cumulative Aphid Counts Aphids / 25 leaves (log scale) UTC Belay IF Belay ST Verimark ST Verimark IF EXP-1 IF (Low) EXP-1 IF (Med) EXP-1 IF (High) EXP-1 ST (Low) EXP-1 ST (Med) EXP-1 ST (High) EXP-2 IF (Low) EXP-2 IF (High) EXP-2 ST (Low) EXP-2 ST (High)
18 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 18 Table 12. Defoliation Ratings Trt Trt Name 13-Jun (wk 7) 15-Jun (wk 6) 22-Jun (wk 8) 28-Jun (wk 9) 10-Jul (wk 11) 16-Jul (wk 12) 25-Jul (wk 13) 03-Aug (wk 14) Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED 2% ± 1% a 2% ± 2% a 13% ± 9%.b 40% ± 28%..c 46% ± 23%.b 43% ± 17%.b 57% ± 13%.b 66% ± 7%.b 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 2% ± 1% a 2% ± 2% a 4% ± 4% a 12% ± 19% a 11% ± 16% a 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) 1% ± 1% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 2% ± 1% ab 3% ± 2% a 3% ± 2% a 6% ± 7% a 5% ± 2% a 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) 1% ± 0% a 2% ± 1% a 4% ± 3% a 21% ± 26%.bc 6% ± 2% a 6% ± 2% a 21% ± 22% ab 19% ± 21% a 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) 1% ± 1% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 3% ± 2% ab 3% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 3% ± 1% a 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) 1% ± 0% a 2% ± 1% a 1% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 1% ± 1% a 1% ± 1% a 5% ± 7% a 3% ± 1% a 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 1% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 3% ± 2% a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 5% ± 7% a 22% ± 39% ab 26% ± 46% a 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 4% ± 4% a 6% ± 6% a 11 EXP-1 ST (High) 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 1% ± 0% a 5% ± 7% a 20% ± 37% a 18% ± 31% a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 2% ± 1% a 2% ± 2% a 3% ± 2% a 15 EXP-2 ST (High) 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 0% a 1% ± 1% a 1% ± 0% a 2% ± 1% a P = n.s. n.s. <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 < <.0001 a. Defoliation ratings were determined by visual inspection of the entire plot b. Means followed by same letter code are not significantly different (Tukey s HSD, α=.05) Figure 9. Defoliation Ratings 13-Jun (wk 6) 15-Jun (wk 6) 22-Jun (wk 7) 22-Jun (wk 7) 28-Jun (wk 8) 10-Jul (wk 10) 16-Jul (wk 11) 25-Jul (wk 12) 03-Aug (wk 13) Defoliation 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% UTC Belay IF Belay ST Verimark ST Verimark IF EXP-1 IF (Low) EXP-1 IF (Med) EXP-1 IF (High) EXP-1 ST (Low) EXP-1 ST (Med) EXP-1 ST (High) EXP-2 IF (Low) EXP-2 IF (High) EXP-2 ST (Low) EXP-2 ST (High)
19 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 19 Table 13. Yield and Tuber Quality Trt Product Marketable Yield US No. 1 US No. 2 Undersize Prp Hollow Prp Double Prp Knob Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD Mean ± SD 1 UNTREATED ± c ± c 9.11 ± 1.74 a 1.63 ± 0.75 a 2.7% ± 0.9% a 1.4% ± 0.7% a 37.8% ± 1.8% a 2 Belay IF (12 fl oz/a) ± abc ± abc 9.29 ± 5.35 a 1.48 ± 0.81 a 4.1% ± 1.1% a 1.4% ± 0.6% a 37.6% ± 3.2% a 3 Belay ST (0.5 fl oz/cwt) ± abc ± abc 7.00 ± 1.86 a 1.20 ± 0.69 a 4.2% ± 1.9% a 2.5% ± 1.6% a 32.4% ± 4.4% a 4 Verimark ST (0.7 fl oz/cwt) ± abc ± abc 7.47 ± 2.62 a 1.01 ± 0.15 a 4.3% ± 1.3% a 2.1% ± 0.6% a 36.0% ± 5.7% a 5 Verimark IF (13 fl oz/a) ± ab ± ab 7.43 ± 1.31 a 1.21 ± 0.27 a 4.4% ± 1.4% a 2.5% ± 1.0% a 34.0% ± 5.0% a 6 EXP-1 IF (Low) ± abc ± ab 6.13 ± 1.59 a 1.15 ± 0.79 a 3.2% ± 1.9% a 1.8% ± 1.1% a 35.6% ± 2.0% a 7 EXP-1 IF (Med) ± ab ± ab 6.02 ± 1.66 a 1.08 ± 0.26 a 3.9% ± 2.0% a 1.9% ± 1.0% a 34.4% ± 3.4% a 8 EXP-1 IF (High) ± a ± a 7.34 ± 2.71 a 1.56 ± 0.78 a 4.4% ± 1.2% a 2.2% ± 0.4% a 37.4% ± 2.1% a 9 EXP-1 ST (Low) ± bc ± bc 9.80 ± 1.92 a 1.65 ± 0.82 a 4.2% ± 0.4% a 2.2% ± 1.0% a 33.9% ± 4.8% a 10 EXP-1 ST (Med) ± abc ± ab 6.45 ± 3.14 a 1.33 ± 0.64 a 4.6% ± 0.7% a 2.4% ± 0.5% a 35.1% ± 3.5% a 11 EXP-1 ST (High) ± ab ± ab 8.18 ± 1.02 a 0.57 ± 0.46 a 3.5% ± 1.1% a 1.4% ± 0.2% a 35.3% ± 2.6% a 12 EXP-2 IF (Low) ± abc ± abc 7.46 ± 0.88 a 1.12 ± 0.78 a 4.0% ± 0.7% a 2.6% ± 1.0% a 39.1% ± 6.8% a 13 EXP-2 IF (High) ± ab ± ab 6.93 ± 2.34 a 1.62 ± 0.80 a 5.0% ± 1.5% a 2.4% ± 0.4% a 33.4% ± 4.8% a 14 EXP-2 ST (Low) ± ab ± ab 6.83 ± 1.34 a 0.93 ± 0.84 a 5.3% ± 1.8% a 3.4% ± 1.6% a 35.0% ± 4.4% a 15 EXP-2 ST (High) ± ab ± ab 6.29 ± 3.93 a 1.08 ± 0.52 a 4.7% ± 0.5% a 2.0% ± 1.1% a 31.9% ± 4.2% a P = <.0001 n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. Yield estimates are reported in units of cwt/ac, calculated from a harvested area of one 40 ft.-long row. Tuber size and quality was determined with an AgRay Vision X-ray electronic grading line. US No. 1 (diam. >= in.) and No. 2 (diam. >= 1.5 in.) tuber grades were assigned based on USDA standards. Means followed by same letter code are not significantly different (Tukey s HSD, α=.05)
20 2018 // Potato // HARS // CPB Systemic Trial Pg. 20 Figure 10. Yield US No. 1 US No Yield estimate (cwt/ac) UTC Belay IF Belay ST Verimark ST Verimark IF EXP-1 IF (Low) EXP-1 IF (Med) EXP-1 IF (High) EXP-1 ST (Low) EXP-1 ST (Med) EXP-1 ST (High) EXP-2 IF (Low) EXP-2 IF (High) EXP-2 ST (Low) EXP-2 ST (High) Yield estimates are calculated from a harvested area of one 40 ft.-long row. Tuber size and quality was determined with an AgRay Vision X-ray electronic grading line. US No. 1 (diam. >= in.) and No. 2 (diam. >= 1.5 in.) tuber grades were assigned based on USDA standards.
3. Potato / HARS / CPB Systemic Trial
Potato / HARS / CPB Systemic Trial 1 3. Potato / HARS / CPB Systemic Trial Soil-applied crop protectants in potato production for full-season pest management and yield enhancement Hancock Agricultural
More informationResponse of Russet Potato to Source and Rate of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application
Response of Russet Potato to Source and Rate of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Samuel Y.C. Essah, Colorado State University Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture San Luis Valley Research
More information2014 Evaluation of Non Irrigated Early Maturing Cotton Varieties, Jay, Florida
2014 Evaluation of Non Irrigated Early Maturing Cotton Varieties, Jay, Florida Darcy Telenko, Mike Donahoe and Barry Brecke This report includes the summary of the 2014 early maturing cotton replicated
More informationEvaluation of Insecticides for Control of Insect Pests in an MG VII Soybean Beaumont, TX 2009 Soybean Nursery North No. 4
Beaumont, TX 2009 Soybean Nursery North No. 4 North PLOT PLAN I II III IV 1 1 2 5 3 2 4 6 5 1 6 4 7 6 8 4 9 3 10 5 11 3 12 2 13 2 14 6 15 5 16 2 17 5 18 3 19 3 20 1 21 4 22 4 23 6 24 1 Guard tier on North
More information2014 Evaluation of Non Irrigated Mid to Full Season Maturing Cotton Varieties, Jay, Florida
2014 Evaluation of Non Irrigated Mid to Full Season Maturing Cotton Varieties, Jay, Florida Darcy Telenko, Mike Donahoe and Barry Brecke This report includes the summary of the 2014 mid to full season
More informationSoybean Agronomy and Host Plant Resistance Beaumont, TX 2009
Beaumont, TX 2009 North I II III IV V 1 HBK C5941 2 S49 W6 RR 3 8325 4 HBK C5025 5 HBK RR5425 6 HBK C5941 7 S49 W6 RR 8 8325 9 HBK C5025 10 HBK RR5425 11 Vernal 12 HBK RR5425 13 8360 14 8325 15 HBK C5941
More informationSoybean Insecticide Screening Test 1 Field north of TRIA house Beaumont, TX 2014 I II III IV
North Soybean Insecticide Screening Test 1 Field north of TRIA house Beaumont, TX 2014 PLOT PLAN I II III IV 1 7 (W) 8 3 (Y) 15 6 (O) 22 4 (P) 2 6 (O) 9 1 (B) 16 5 (LG) 23 7 (W) 3 5 (LG) 10 2 (R) 17 7
More informationPest Management in Potatoes
Pest Management in Potatoes Late Blight, Early Blight, and Verticillium Wilt Jeff Miller Foliar Diseases in Southern Idaho Early blight/brown leaf spot annual Affected by plant nutrition White mold annual
More informationLocation Field 30 at the University of Delaware Research and Education Center Farm, Georgetown, DE.
Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Materials and Methods... 1 Results... 2 Acknowledgements... 2 Table 1. 2009 Slicing Cucumber Variety Trial: Varieties Entered, Submitting Company, and Reported Days
More informationYELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN ONION AFTER THREE YEARS OF CORN HERBICIDES
YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN ONION AFTER THREE YEARS OF CORN HERBICIDES Joel Felix and Joey Ishida, Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, OR, 2013 Introduction Yellow nutsedge has
More informationEvaluation of Contact and Residual Activity of Selected Insecticides for Control of Rice Stink Bug. Beaumont, TX
Title: Evaluation of Contact and Residual Activity of Selected Insecticides for Control of Rice Stink Bug. Beaumont, TX. 2001. Principal Investigator: M.O. Way Texas A&M University Agricultural Research
More informationEVALUATiON OF YUKON HERBICIDE RATES FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN GROWN IN ROTATIONS FOLLOWED BY ONION
EVALUATiON OF YUKON HERBICIDE RATES FOR YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN GROWN IN ROTATIONS FOLLOWED BY ONION Joel Felix and Joey Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2008
More informationVolume XVII, Number July Chasing Petioles
Research & Extension for the Potato Industry of Idaho, Oregon, & Washington Andrew Jensen, Editor. ajensen@potatoes.com; 509-760-4859 www.nwpotatoresearch.com Volume XVII, Number 12 25 July 2017 Chasing
More information2008 Lygus Small Plot Efficacy Trial University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center Peter C. Ellsworth, Ph.D. 24 November 2008
2008 Lygus Small lot Efficacy Trial University of Arizona Maricopa Agricultural Center eter C. Ellsworth, h.d. 24 November 2008 The 2008 Lygus small plot efficacy trial was marked by a large number of
More informationUniversity of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service
Reps: 3 Plots: 5 by 10 feet Spray vol: 25 gal/ac Mix size: 1 liters (min.32588) Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Appl Amt Product Plot No. By Rep No. Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Code
More informationEffect of Organic Soil Fertility and Fungicide Treatments on Yield and Pest Management, Neely-Kinyon Farm-2015
Effect of Organic Soil Fertility and Fungicide Treatments on Yield and Pest Management, Neely-Kinyon Farm-2015 Kathleen Delate, professor Departments of Horticulture & Agronomy Rebecca Johnson, research
More informationFN15Nostoc. Objective: to determine the effectiveness of different herbicides on Nostoc in gravel in container nurseries.
FN15Nostoc Objective: to determine the effectiveness of different herbicides on Nostoc in gravel in container nurseries. Summary: On July 24, 2015, herbicide treatments were applied to a container nursery
More informationAvoiding Stink Bug Damage and Flat Pod Syndrome in Soybean with a MGVI Cultivar and Planting Date Beaumont, TX 2005
Avoiding Stink Bug Damage and Flat Pod Syndrome in Soybean with a MGVI Cultivar and Planting Date Beaumont, TX 2005 Agronomic and Cultural Information Land Preparation: Disked test area (Morey silt loam)
More informationRemote Sensing as a Tool to Manage Nitrogen for Irrigated Potato Production
Remote Sensing as a Tool to Manage Nitrogen for Irrigated Potato Production Brian Bohman, Carl Rosen, and David Mulla Department of Soil, Water, and Climate University of Minnesota Potato Remote Sensing
More informationTrial Report: Slicing Cucumber Variety Evaluation Fall 2014
Trial Report: Slicing Cucumber Variety Evaluation Fall 2014 Conducted by: Timothy Coolong, PhD Department of Horticulture University of Georgia 2360 Rainwater Road Tifton, GA 31793 Methods Location: Tifton,
More information2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Russet Burbank Potatoes: Production and Storage Costs Paul E. Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationBackground and Assumptions
EBB4-SU-17 2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Bingham and Power Counties Sugarbeets Ben Eborn Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationWeeds, Weed Control and PGRs Ronald N. Calhoun and Aaron D. Hathaway Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Michigan State University
Weeds, Weed Control and PGRs Ronald N. Calhoun and Aaron D. Hathaway Department of Crop and Soil Sciences Michigan State University Almost 30 weed related projects were started or continued in 2004. The
More informationFoliar Application of 2,4-D Reduces Damage to Potato Tubers by Common Scab
Foliar Application of 2,4-D Reduces Damage to Potato Tubers by Common Scab Common scab (Streptomyces scabies) is a persistent soil-borne disease that causes rough corky lesions on the surface of potato
More informationVEGETABLE CULTIVAR AND CULTURAL TRIALS 2009
VEGETABLE CULTIVAR AND CULTURAL TRIALS 2009 PREPARED BY: D. WATERER D. ROY P. SZAROZ FUNDED BY: AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT FUND Department of Plant Sciences University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Drive Saskatoon,
More informationUniversity of Florida-IFAS
TOMATO: Lyopersicon esculentum Miller Sanibel Beet armyworm: Spodoptera exigua (Hubnner) Dakshina R. Seal University of Florida-IFAS Tropical Research and Education Center Homestead, Fl 33031 Phn: 305-986-8926
More informationField Evaluation of Almond Varieties
ield Evaluation of Almond Varieties Project No.: Project Leader: Project Cooperators: 10-HORT2-Lampinen Bruce Lampinen Department of Plant Sciences UC Davis One Shields Ave. Davis, CA 95616 bdlampinen@ucdavis.edu
More informationIR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form
Project Title: Phytotoxicity of BAS 659h G applied over the top to selected herbaceous and woody ornamental plants (May 2008 trials) Protocol #: 08-010 Narrative Summary (Results/Discussion) Agapanthus
More informationImperial County Agricultural Briefs
Imperial County Agricultural Briefs Features From your Farm Advisors April, 2009 Page INFORMATION NEEDED: VEGETABLE AND FIELD CROPS PRODUCTION GUIDELINES....... Mark A. Trent 2 TARPING HAY...... Juan N.
More information2014 Ryan Lawn and Tree Overseeding Evaluation. University of Nebraska-Lincoln & Kansas State University. Zac Reicher, Jared Hoyle, and Matt Sousek
2014 Ryan Lawn and Tree Overseeding Evaluation University of Nebraska-Lincoln & Kansas State University Zac Reicher, Jared Hoyle, and Matt Sousek This study was done at the Rocky Ford Turfgrass Research
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are based
More informationIR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report
Project Title: Phytotoxicity on Arborvitae (Thuja occidentalis Emerald Green ) with over the top applications of select sedge control materials Protocol #: 07-009 Report date: October 2, 2007 Authors:
More informationCreeping Bentgrass Phytotoxicity and Control Evaluation of Lawn Height Midnight Kentucky Bluegrass
Creeping Bentgrass Phytotoxicity and Control Evaluation of Lawn Height Midnight Kentucky Bluegrass J. A. Borger, T. L. Watschke, and M. B. Naedel 1 Introduction Phytotoxicity and control evaluations were
More informationMean Comparisons PLANNED F TESTS
Mean Comparisons F-tests provide information on significance of treatment effects, but no information on what the treatment effects are. Comparisons of treatment means provide information on what the treatment
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Production Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates are
More informationIR-4 ORNAMENTAL DATA REPORTING FORM
IR-4 ORNAMENTAL DATA REPORTING FORM 1. INVESTIGATOR (Name, Address, Phone#):Betsy Anderson / Dr. Michael Reding, USDA-ARS, Application Technology Research Unit, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, Ohio 44691 (330)
More informationIR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form
Project Title: Phytotoxicity of Biathlon 2.75G (Oxyfluorfen + prodiamine) applied over the top to selected ornamental plants (September 2009 Trials) Protocol #: 09-020 Narrative Summary (Results/Discussion)
More informationEARLY POST-EMERGENT CONTROL OF SMOOTH CRABGRASS AND THIN PASPALUM WITH TANK-MIXES OF VARIOUS HERBICIDES.
EARLY POST-EMERGENT CONTROL OF SMOOTH CRABGRASS AND THIN PASPALUM WITH TANK-MIXES OF VARIOUS HERBICIDES. S.J. McDonald, Turfgrass Disease Solutions, LLC Abstract Smooth crabgrass (Digitaria ischaemum)
More informationBentgrass and Fineleaf Fescue Cultivar and Species Differences in Phytotoxicity to Mesotrione
Bentgrass and Fineleaf Fescue Cultivar and Species Differences in Phytotoxicity to Mesotrione Matthew W. Williams, Charles T. Golob, William J. Johnston, and Karine Paré Department of Crop and Soil Sciences
More informationNutrient status of potatoes grown on compost amended soils as determined by sap nitrate levels.
Nutrient status of potatoes grown on compost amended soils as determined by sap nitrate levels. Katherine Buckley, Ramona Mohr, Randy Westwood Brandon Research Centre, AAFC Van Coulter, Kristen Phillips,
More informationUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE PROCESSING VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE PROCESSING VARIETY TRIAL RESULTS Emmalea Ernest and Gordon Johnson University of Delaware Carvel Research and Education Center 16483 County Seat Highway Georgetown, DE 19947 2015
More informationMORPH forecast for carrot flies
MORPH forecast for carrot flies Purpose: to measure and collect temperature data for the carrot fly forecast model in MORPH and investigate the possibilities to use MORPH in Denmark to forecast optimal
More informationYELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN VARIOUS CROPS
YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN VARIOUS CROPS Corey V. Ransom, Charles A. Rice, and Joey K. Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2003 Introduction Yellow nutsedge is an increasing
More informationTrial Report: Seedless Watermelon Variety Evaluation 2015
Trial Report: Seedless Watermelon Variety Evaluation 2015 Conducted by: Timothy Coolong, PhD Department of Horticulture University of Georgia 2360 Rainwater Road Tifton, GA 31793 tcoolong@uga.edu List
More informationTrial Report: Slicing Cucumber Variety Evaluation Spring 2014
Trial Report: Slicing Cucumber Variety Evaluation Spring 2014 Conducted by: Timothy Coolong, PhD Department of Horticulture University of Georgia 2360 Rainwater Road Tifton, GA 31793 Methods Location:
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Lower Rainfall Dryland Feed Barley Ben Eborn and Terrell Sorensen Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationSouthern Illinois University Plexus with Fomesafen Herbicides.
Trial Status: F one-year/final Initiation Date: 6-13-15 Completion Date: 10-20-15 City: Belleville Country: USA State/Prov.: Illinois IL Postal Code: 62221 Trial Location Objectives: Evaluate the effect
More informationAGRONOMIC POTENTIAL AND LIMITATIONS OF USING PRECIPITATED CALCIUM CARBONATE IN THE HIGH PLAINS
GRONOMIC POTENTIL ND LIMITTIONS OF USING PRECIPITTED CLCIUM CRONTE IN THE HIGH PLINS Gary W Hergert*, Murali K Darapuneni, Robert H. Wilson, Robert M. Harveson, Jeffrey D. radshaw and Rex. Nielsen University
More informationTexas Panhandle Sorghum Hay Trial 2010
Inches 1 0.5 0 Texas Panhandle Sorghum Hay Trial 2010 Brent Bean 1, Jake Becker 2, Jürg Blumenthal 3, Jake Robinson 2, Rex Brandon 2, Rex VanMeter 2, and Dennis Pietsch 4 Introduction The trial consisted
More informationDale Baird Gary Bretthauer Dave Feltes Russ Higgins Jim Morrison. Eric Adee Robert Dunker Michael Kleiss Larry Meyer Lyle Paul
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Trials conducted by the Insect Management and Insecticide Efficacy Program at the University of Illinois are the result of the collaborative efforts of many individuals. We extend our gratitude
More informationYELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN AND DRY BEAN CROPS
YELLOW NUTSEDGE CONTROL IN CORN AND DRY BEAN CROPS Corey V. Ransom, Charles A. Rice, and Joey K. Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2004 Introduction Yellow nutsedge
More informationNutrient Recommendations for Russet Burbank Potatoes in Southern Alberta
Revised May 2011 Agdex 258/541-1 Nutrient Recommendations for Russet Burbank Potatoes in Southern Alberta Precise fertilizer application rates are critical for optimal potato production. Sufficient nutrients
More informationAlion, Sencor, and Sharpen for Preemergence Kochia Control in an Abandoned Alfalfa Field
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports Volume 2 Issue 7 Southwest Research-Extension Center Reports Article 20 January 2016 Alion,, and Sharpen for Preemergence Kochia Control in an Abandoned
More informationWhat is insect forecasting, and why do it
Insect Forecasting Programs: Objectives, and How to Properly Interpret the Data John Gavloski, Extension Entomologist, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives Carman, MB R0G 0J0 Email: jgavloski@gov.mb.ca
More informationSelf-Propelled Machines FUEL RECORD PERF FUEL CONS LABOR LABOR PURCHASE SV R&M USEFUL ANNUAL
Table 1. Parameters Diesel Fuel (DI) Price......($/gal): 1.28 Electricity (EL) Price......($/kWh): 0.09 Gasoline (GA) Price........($/gal): 1.30 LP Gas (LP) Price.........($/gal): 0.70 Natural Gas (NG)
More informationN Management in Potato Production. David Mulla, Carl Rosen, Tyler Nigonand Brian Bohman Dept. Soil, Water & Climate University of Minnesota
N Management in Potato Production David Mulla, Carl Rosen, Tyler Nigonand Brian Bohman Dept. Soil, Water & Climate University of Minnesota Topics Background and conventional nitrogen management Evaluate
More informationDo More Inputs Increase Soybean Yield AND Profitability?
Do More Inputs Increase Soybean Yield AND Profitability? - David Marburger*, Bryson Haverkamp, Randy Laurenz, John Orlowski, Eric Wilson, Shaun Casteel, Chad Lee, Seth Naeve, Emerson Nafziger, Kraig Roozeboom,
More informationPennsylvania Potato Research Report, 2009
Pennsylvania Potato Research Report, 2009 Department of Plant Pathology Edited by: Barbara J. Christ Professor of Plant Pathology The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802 January 25,
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure valley Commercial Dry Beans Kathleen Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationStrategies to Optimize Thrips Control in the Klamath Basin
Strategies to Optimize Thrips Control in the Klamath Basin Steve Orloff, Farm Advisor, Siskiyou County Larry Godfrey, Entomology Specialist, UCD Rob Wilson, IREC Director Funded by CGORAB Thrips feed by
More informationTitle Sorghum/Cotton Rotation under Extreme Deficit Irrigation Conditions. Location Texas Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Halfway, TX
Title Sorghum/Cotton Rotation under Extreme Deficit Irrigation Conditions Participants James P. Bordovsky, TAES, Lubbock/Halfway Calvin Trostle, TAEX, Lubbock Eduardo Segarra, Texas Tech, TAES, Lubbock
More informationtemperature. March ended unseasonably warm but was followed by an extended cold
2007 Turfgrass Weed Control Summary Crabgrass Ronald Calhoun and Aaron Hathaway Dept of Crop and Soil Sciences Michigan State University Crabgrass populations were moderate to low in 2007 due to inconsistent
More informationPaul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Commercial Dry Beans Paul Patterson and Steven Hines Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationDectes Stem Borer: A Summertime Pest of Soybeans
Dectes Stem Borer: A Summertime Pest of Soybeans Veronica Johnson* and Cerruti R 2 Hooks $ University of Maryland Dept. of Entomology * Graduate student and $ Associate professor and Extension Specialist
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho Spring Malting Barley Ben Eborn, Terrell Sorensen and Jon Hogge Eastern Idaho Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationW285. Matthew S. Wiggins Graduate Research Assistant Department of Plant Sciences. C. Owen Gwathmey Professor Emeritus Department of Plant Sciences
W285 Matthew S. Wiggins Graduate Research Assistant Department of Plant Sciences C. Owen Gwathmey Professor Emeritus Department of Plant Sciences Fred L. Allen Coordinator Agronomic Crop Variety Testing
More informationSince its inception in 1984, the
on Target Since its inception in 1984, the University of Illinois Insect Management and Insecticide Efficacy Program has provided the producers of Illinois complete and informative evaluations of registered
More informationInfluence of different nitrogen levels on the management of Bt cotton sucking pests
2017; 5(2): 16-21 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 JEZS 2017; 5(2): 16-21 2017 JEZS Received: 04-01-2017 Accepted: 05-02-2017 S Anusha Part of M.Sc (Ag) thesis submitted by the senior author to Acharya
More informationEFFECTS OF HEATING AND FREEZING ON TRANSLUCENT SCALE IN ONION BULBS
EFFECTS OF HEATING AND FREEZING ON TRANSLUCENT SCALE IN ONION BULBS Clinton C. Shock, Erik B. G. Feibert, and Lamont D. Saunders Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2001-2002
More informationClick to edit Master title style Effect of seed and foliar treatments on vigor of soybean plants Jerseyville, IL
Click to edit Master title style Effect of seed and treatments on vigor of soybean plants Jerseyville, IL Click to edit Master text styles Plant vigor 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 Second level UTC
More informationFractional Replications
Chapter 11 Fractional Replications Consider the set up of complete factorial experiment, say k. If there are four factors, then the total number of plots needed to conduct the experiment is 4 = 1. When
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Hard Red Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationEvaluation of Herbicide Carryover Sub-Surface Drip Irrigated Tomato. Kurt Hembree and Tom Turini Farm Advisors, UCCE Fresno County
Evaluation of Herbicide Carryover Sub-Surface Drip Irrigated Tomato Kurt Hembree and Tom Turini Farm Advisors, UCCE Fresno County Poor Root Development; Fresno Co. 2008-2013 Few fibrous roots Field Observations
More informationBackground & Assumptions
EBB2 SWWW 15 2015 Costs and Returns Estimate.. Southwestern Idaho: Treasure Valley Soft White Winter Wheat Ben Eborn Southwestern Idaho Background & Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns
More informationBUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS
BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS Cost of Producing Fresh and Processing Blueberries in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia Spring 2016 The BUILDING BUSINESS SUCCESS enterprise budget series were developed to
More informationEffects of high plant populations on the growth and yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus)
Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge (1999), 132, 173 180. 1999 Cambridge University Press Printed in the United Kingdom 173 Effects of high plant populations on the growth and yield of winter oilseed
More informationSouthern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel. Pest Description. Maintenance.
Study Director: Bryan Young Title: Professor General Trial Information Trial Status: F - one-year/final Initiation Date: 5-22-12 City: Belleville State/Prov.: IL Postal Code: 62221 Country: USA Trial Location
More information3 c 0.3 b 2 b 1.7 b 2 c 10 c. 0 c 0 b 0.7 b 0.7 b 0.7 c 3.7 c b 34 b 26 b 26.7 b 56.3 b 73.3 b. 5.7 c 7.7 b 9.7 b 8.3 b 16.
Table 1: Pre rabgrass ontrol Echelon Split pps. 2008 Rate (L /) June 9 June 23 July 2 July 10 July 30 ugust 26 40 DT- 54 DT- 63 DT- 71 DT- 91 DT- 118 DT- 13 DT- 22 DT- 30 DT- 50 DT- 77 DT- crabgrass centers
More informationPaul Patterson Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Corn Silage: Grown Using Genetically Modified Seed Paul Patterson Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho s costs
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwest Idaho: Treasure Valley Field Corn: Roundup Ready Kathleen Painter, Jerry Neufeld, Neil Rimbey and Paul Patterson Southwestern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs
More informationEastern Idaho. Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Eastern Idaho: Soft White Spring Wheat Paul E. Patterson and Juliet M. Marshall Background and Assumptions Eastern Idaho The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationCrop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area
Crop Enterprise Budget Sugar Beets, Thick-Planted, Wheatland Area John P. Hewlett, Farm/Ranch Management Extension Specialist Chris Bastian, Research Associate MP-72.3 University of Wyoming - August, 1994
More informationPaul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions
2015 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Spring Malting Barley Paul Patterson, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Background and Assumptions Magic Valley The University of Idaho
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Soft White Spring Wheat Ben Eborn, Steven Hines and Juliet Marshall. Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs
More informationCorey V. Ransom, Charles A. Rice, and Joey K. Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2004.
FACTORS INFLUENCING VAPAM EFFICACY ON YELLOW NUTSEDGE TUBERS Corey V. Ransom, Charles A. Rice, and Joey K. Ishida Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2004 Introduction Yellow
More informationResponse of Cotton to Precision-Guided Cultivation and DSMA in a Dense Stand of Purple Nutsedge
Response of Cotton to Precision-Guided Cultivation and DSMA in a Dense Stand of Purple Nutsedge Item Type text; Article Authors Thacker, Gary W.; McCloskey, William B. Publisher College of Agriculture,
More informationRESEARCH REPORT TO: THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR 2009 VegNet Regional Pest Monitoring Program
RESEARCH REPORT TO: THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR 2009 TITLE: VegNet Regional Pest Monitoring Program RESEARCH LEADER: Daniel McGrath PHONE: 503-931-8307 EMAIL: daniel.mcgrath@oregonstate.edu
More informationABSTRACT. and has become recognized as an important force influencing the structure of
ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation / Thesis: HOST PLANT-MEDIATED INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION VIA INDUCED RESISTANCE: INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE POTATO LEAFHOPPER AND THE COLORADO POTATO BEETLE Margaret Emma Lynch,
More informationSouthwestern Idaho. The Model Farm. Production Practices
2013 Costs and Returns Estimate Southwestern Idaho and Eastern Oregon: Treasure Valley Onions Mike Thornton, Neil R. Rimbey, and Kate Painter Background and Assumptions Southwestern Idaho The University
More informationOnion Thrips: Contributions of Life Stage Survival and Adult Dispersal to Populations on Plants
Onion Thrips: Contributions of Life Stage Survival and Adult Dispersal to Populations on Plants Diane Alston Entomologist Utah State University Extension 2007 Utah Onion Association Meeting Why are onion
More informationIntermountain Thrips Story:
Intermountain Thrips Story: What we have learned and what we would still like to know Steve Orloff, Farm Advisor, Siskiyou County Rob Wilson, IREC Director Larry Godfrey, Entomology Specialist, UCD Funded
More informationIR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Form
Project Title: Phytotoxicity of Tower 63.9%EC (Dimethenamid-p) applied over the top to Lantana, Nandina, Nepeta and Potentilla Protocol #: 09-011 Narrative Summary (Results/Discussion) Lantana camara Dwarf
More informationBioefficacy and Phytotoxicity of Alanto 240 SC (Thiacloprid 240 SC) against Thrips and Natural Enemies in Pomegranate
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 7 Number 08 (2018) Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.708.182
More informationFlower Species as a Supplemental Source of Pollen for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Late Summer Cropping Systems
Flower Species as a Supplemental Source of Pollen for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera) in Late Summer Cropping Systems Rhonda Simmons, Ramesh Sagili, and Bruce Martens Abstract Honey bee forager preference
More informationVolume XIV, Number 1 January 6, 2014
Research & Extension for the Potato Industry of Idaho, Oregon, & Washington Andrew Jensen, Editor. ajensen@potatoes.com; 208-939-9965 www.nwpotatoresearch.com Volume XIV, Number 1 January 6, 2014 Accuracy
More informationthose in Arizona. This period would extend through the fall equinox (September 23, 1993). Thus, pending variation due to cloudiness, total light flux
PERFORMANCE OF KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SEED TREATED WITH METHANOL Fred J. Crowe, D. Dale Coats, and Marvin D. Butler, Central Oregon Agricultural Research Center Abstract Foliar-applied methanol was purported
More informationEvaluation of Fall Application of Dual Magnum for Control of Yellow Nutsedge in Onions Grown on Muck Soils
Evaluation of Fall Application of Dual Magnum for Control of Yellow Nutsedge in Onions Grown on Muck Soils Christy Hoepting and Kathryn Klotzbach, Cornell Vegetable Program Background: Yellow nutsedge
More informationBackground and Assumptions
2017 Costs and Returns Estimate Southcentral Idaho: Magic Valley Alfalfa Hay Establishment with Oats Ben Eborn Magic Valley Background and Assumptions The University of Idaho s costs and returns estimates
More informationACCURACY OF MODELS FOR PREDICTING PHENOLOGY OF BLACKHEADED FIREWORM AND IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVED PEST MANAGEMENT
ACCURACY OF MODELS FOR PREDICTING PHENOLOGY OF BLACKHEADED FIREWORM AND IMPLICATIONS FOR IMPROVED PEST MANAGEMENT Stephen D. Cockfield and Daniel L. Mahr Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin-Madison
More informationInput Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, AG -1291
Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 AG -1291 Input Costs Trends for Arkansas Field Crops, 2007-2013 October 2013 AG-1291 Archie Flanders Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
More information