spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb
|
|
|
- Karen Parsons
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 X Z Y spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Project: CSA A Kt Torsional Stiffness Illustration Frame: Engineer:
2 Shear Diagram - kn Moment Diagram - knm LEGEND: Envelope spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Project: CSA A Kt Torsional Stiffness Illustration Frame: Engineer:
3 Middle Strip Moment Capacity - knm Column Strip Moment Capacity - knm LEGEND: Envelope Curve Capacity Curve Support Centerline Face of Support spslab v3.11. Licensed to: STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC. License ID: D2DE-2175C File: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Project: CSA A Kt Torsional Stiffness Illustration Frame: Engineer:
4 , 03:27:02 PM C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Page 1 oooooo o o oo oo oo oo ooooo oooooo oo oo ooooo oo oo o oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo oo ooo oo oooooo oooooo ooooo oo oo ooo oo oo oo oo oo oo oooooo oo oo oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo ooooo oo oooooo ooo ooooo o ooooo (TM) ================================================================================================= spslab v3.11 (TM) A Computer Program for Analysis, Design, and Investigation of Reinforced Concrete Beams, One-way and Two-way Slab Systems Copyright , STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC All rights reserved ================================================================================================= Licensee stated above acknowledges that STRUCTUREPOINT (SP) is not and cannot be responsible for either the accuracy or adequacy of the material supplied as input for processing by the spslab computer program. Furthermore, STRUCTUREPOINT neither makes any warranty expressed nor implied with respect to the correctness of the output prepared by the spslab program. Although STRUCTUREPOINT has endeavored to produce spslab error free the program is not and cannot be certified infallible. The final and only responsibility for analysis, design and engineering documents is the licensee's. Accordingly, STRUCTUREPOINT disclaims all responsibility in contract, negligence or other tort for any analysis, design or engineering documents prepared in connection with the use of the spslab program. ================================================================================================================== [1] INPUT ECHO ================================================================================================================== General Information =================== File name: C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Project: CSA A Kt Torsional Stiffness Illustration Frame: Engineer: Code: CSA A Reinforcement Database: CSA G30.18 Mode: Design Number of supports = 6 + Left cantilever + Right cantilever Floor System: Two-Way Live load pattern ratio = 75% Minimum free edge for punching shear = 5 times slab effective depth Deflections are based on cracked section properties. In negative moment regions, Ig and Mcr DO NOT include flange/slab contribution (if available) Long-term deflections are calculated for load duration of 60 months. 0% of live load is sustained. Compression reinforcement calculations NOT selected. Default incremental rebar design selected. Combined M-V-T reinforcement design NOT selected. User-defined slab strip widths selected. User-defined distribution factors NOT selected. One-way shear in drop panel NOT selected. Distribution of shear to strips NOT selected. Beam T-section design NOT selected. Longitudinal beam contribution in negative reinforcement design over support NOT selected. Transverse beam contribution in negative reinforcement design over support NOT selected. Material Properties =================== Slabs Beams Columns wc = kg/m3 f'c = MPa Ec = MPa fr = MPa Precast concrete construction is not selected. fy = 400 MPa, Bars are not epoxy-coated fyt = 400 MPa Es = MPa Reinforcement Database ====================== Units: Db (mm), Ab (mm^2), Wb (kg/m) Size Db Ab Wb Size Db Ab Wb # # # # # #
5 , 03:27:02 PM C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Page 2 # # Span Data ========= Slabs Units: L1, wl, wr (m); t, Hmin (mm) Span Loc L1 t wl wr Hmin Int LC 2 Int Int Int Int Int Int RC Support Data ============ Columns Units: c1a, c2a, c1b, c2b (mm); Ha, Hb (m) Supp c1a c2a Ha c1b c2b Hb Red% Drop Panels Units: h (mm); L1, L2, W1, W2 (m) Supp h L1 L2 W1 W Transverse Beams Units: b, h, Ecc (mm) Supp b h Ecc Boundary Conditions Units: Kz (kn/mm); Kry (kn-mm/rad) Supp Spring Kz Spring Kry Far End A Far End B Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Load Data ========= Load Cases and Combinations Case SELF Dead Live Type DEAD DEAD LIVE U Area Loads Units: Wa (kn/m2) Case/Patt Span Wa SELF
6 , 03:27:02 PM C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Page Dead Live Live/Odd Live/Even Live/S Live/S Live/S Live/S Live/S Live/S Line Loads Units: Wa, Wb (kn/m), La, Lb (m) Case/Patt Span Wa La Wb Lb SELF Reinforcement Criteria ====================== Slabs and Ribs Top bars Bottom bars Min Max Min Max Bar Size #15 #15 #15 #15 Bar spacing mm Reinf ratio % Cover mm There is NOT more than 300 mm of concrete below top bars. Beams Top bars Bottom bars Stirrups Min Max Min Max Min Max Bar Size #20 #35 #20 #35 #10 #20 Bar spacing mm Reinf ratio % Cover mm Layer dist mm No. of legs 2 6 Side cover 40 mm 1st Stirrup 75 mm There is NOT more than 300 mm of concrete below top bars.
7 , 03:27:44 PM C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Page 1 oooooo o o oo oo oo oo ooooo oooooo oo oo ooooo oo oo o oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo oo ooo oo oooooo oooooo ooooo oo oo ooo oo oo oo oo oo oo oooooo oo oo oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo oo o oo oo oo oo ooooo oo oooooo ooo ooooo o ooooo (TM) ================================================================================================= spslab v3.11 (TM) A Computer Program for Analysis, Design, and Investigation of Reinforced Concrete Beams, One-way and Two-way Slab Systems Copyright , STRUCTUREPOINT, LLC All rights reserved ================================================================================================= Licensee stated above acknowledges that STRUCTUREPOINT (SP) is not and cannot be responsible for either the accuracy or adequacy of the material supplied as input for processing by the spslab computer program. Furthermore, STRUCTUREPOINT neither makes any warranty expressed nor implied with respect to the correctness of the output prepared by the spslab program. Although STRUCTUREPOINT has endeavored to produce spslab error free the program is not and cannot be certified infallible. The final and only responsibility for analysis, design and engineering documents is the licensee's. Accordingly, STRUCTUREPOINT disclaims all responsibility in contract, negligence or other tort for any analysis, design or engineering documents prepared in connection with the use of the spslab program. ================================================================================================================== [6] SEGMENTAL MOMENT AND SHEAR - ENVELOPES ================================================================================================================== Span x (m) M- (knm) Comb M+ (knm) Comb V- (kn) Comb V+ (kn) Comb U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U1
8 , 03:27:44 PM C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Page U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U1
9 , 03:27:44 PM C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Page U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U1
10 , 03:27:45 PM C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Page U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U1
11 , 03:27:45 PM C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Page U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U1
12 , 03:27:45 PM C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Page U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U1
13 , 03:27:45 PM C:\Data\CSA A Kt Revised.slb Page U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U1
Moment Redistribution
TIME SAVING DESIGN AID Page 1 of 23 A 3-span continuous beam has center-to-center span lengths of 30 ft-0 in. The beam is 20 in. by 28 in. and all columns are 20 in. by 20 in. In this example, the beam
Figure 1: Representative strip. = = 3.70 m. min. per unit length of the selected strip: Own weight of slab = = 0.
Example (8.1): Using the ACI Code approximate structural analysis, design for a warehouse, a continuous one-way solid slab supported on beams 4.0 m apart as shown in Figure 1. Assume that the beam webs
TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9).
TABLE OF CONTANINET 1. Design criteria. 2. Lateral loads. 2-1. Wind loads calculation 2-2. Seismic loads 3. 3D finite element model (SAP2000, Ver.16). 4. Design of vertical elements (CSI, Ver.9). 4-1.
PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT
Structural Concrete Software System TN191_PT7_punching_shear_aci_4 011505 PUNCHING SHEAR CALCULATIONS 1 ACI 318; ADAPT-PT 1. OVERVIEW Punching shear calculation applies to column-supported slabs, classified
Two-Way Flat Plate Concrete Floor System Analysis and Design
Two-Way Flat Plate Concrete Floor System Analysis and Design Version: Aug-10-017 Two-Way Flat Plate Concrete Floor System Analysis and Design The concrete floor slab system shown below is for an intermediate
SPECIFIC VERIFICATION Chapter 5
As = 736624/(0.5*413.69) = 3562 mm 2 (ADAPT 3569 mm 2, B29, C6) Data Block 27 - Compressive Stresses The initial compressive strength, f ci, is the strength entered in the Material/Concrete input screen.
Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )
Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A23.3-94) Slender Concrete Column Design in Sway Frame Buildings Evaluate slenderness effect for columns in a
Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - RC Two Way Spanning Slab XX
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 35 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of
PROPOSED SATSANG HALL TECHNICAL REPORT
PROPOSED SATSANG HALL - VERTICAL STRIP V1 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADAPT CORPORATION STRUCTURAL CONCRETE SOFTWARE SYSTEM 1733 Woodside Road, Suite
DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy)
DEFLECTION CALCULATIONS (from Nilson and Nawy) The deflection of a uniformly loaded flat plate, flat slab, or two-way slab supported by beams on column lines can be calculated by an equivalent method that
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II)
Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures (II) Discussion Eng. Mohammed R. Kuheil Review The thickness of one-way ribbed slabs After finding the value of total load (Dead and live loads), the elements are
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures
Lecture-08 Gravity Load Analysis of RC Structures By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar www.drqaisarali.com 1 Contents Analysis Approaches Point of Inflection Method Equivalent
SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN
CHAPTER 11 SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN Article 49. Cracking Limit State 49.1 General considerations In the case of verifications relating to Cracking Limit State, the effects of actions comprise
twenty one concrete construction: shear & deflection ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture
ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2014 lecture twenty one concrete construction: Copyright Kirk Martini shear & deflection Concrete Shear 1 Shear in Concrete
Serviceability Deflection calculation
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation Deflection example Structural Design Profession is concerned with: Limit States Philosophy: Strength Limit State (safety-fracture, fatigue, overturning
Concrete and Masonry Structures 1 Office hours
Concrete and Masonry Structures 1 Petr Bílý, office B731 http://people.fsv.cvut.cz/www/bilypet1 Courses in English Concrete and Masonry Structures 1 Office hours Credit receiving requirements General knowledge
Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed.
ARCH 631 Note Set 11 S017abn Case Study in Reinforced Concrete adapted from Simplified Design of Concrete Structures, James Ambrose, 7 th ed. Building description The building is a three-story office building
Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building
Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building 16 14 14 3 C 1 B 1 C 2 B 2 C 3 B 3 C 4 13 B 15 (S 1 ) B 16 (S 2 ) B 17 (S 3 ) B 18 7 B 4 B 5 B 6 B 7 C 5 C 6 C 7 C 8 C 9 7 B 20 B 22 14 B 19 (S 4 ) C 10 C 11 B 23
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 17 3.6 Shear walls Walls carrying vertical loads should be designed as columns. Basically walls are designed in the same manner as columns, but there are
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL
DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL When the height of the retaining wall exceeds about 6 m, the thickness of the stem and heel slab works out to be sufficiently large and the design becomes
1/29/2010 Page 2 of 65 1/29/2010 Page 3 of 65 1/29/2010 Page 4 of 65 Project Information 1/29/2010 Page 5 of 65 Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Project Number 09-118 West Detention Vault West Vault City of Auburn
Software Verification
EXAMPLE 16 racked Slab Analysis RAKED ANALYSIS METHOD The moment curvature diagram shown in Figure 16-1 depicts a plot of the uncracked and cracked conditions, Ψ 1 State 1, and, Ψ State, for a reinforced
Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: SAFE 014 EXAMPLE 16 racked Slab Analysis RAKED ANALYSIS METHOD The moment curvature diagram shown in Figure 16-1 depicts a plot of the uncracked and cracked conditions, 1 State 1, and, State,
4.3 Moment Magnification
CHAPTER 4: Reinforced Concrete Columns 4.3 Moment Magnification Description An ordinary or first order frame analysis does not include either the effects of the lateral sidesway deflections of the column
Two Way Beam Supported Slab
Two Way Beam Supported Slab Part 2 The following example was done by Mr. Naim Hassan, 3 rd Year 2 nd Semester Student of CE Dept., AUST 16 The following Example was done by Md. Mahmudun Nobe, ID -.01.03.078,
Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data
The design formulae and data provided in this Annex are for education, training and assessment purposes only. They are based on the Hong Kong Code of Practice for Structural Use of Concrete 2013 (HKCP-2013).
3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties
CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.5 Reinforced Concrete Section Properties Description his application calculates gross section moment of inertia neglecting reinforcement, moment of inertia
3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:
Sabah Shawkat Cabinet of Structural Engineering 017 3. Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups: (1) slabs supported on edges of
Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]
![Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]](/thumbs/78/77625473.jpg "Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]")
Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design] A typical floor system of a lecture hall is to be designed as a ribbed slab. The joists which are spaced at 400mm are supported by girders. The overall depth of the slab
Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602
Design of wall panel according to EN 160 Example 3: Wall panel with wind load 1.1 Issue Design of a wall panel at an industrial building Materials with a compressive strength 3,5, density class 500, welded
Reinforced Concrete Structures/Design Aids
AREA OF BARS (mm 2 ) Reinforced Concrete Structures/Design Aids Size of s (mm) Number of s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 50 101 151 201 251 302 352 402 10 79 157 236 314 393 471 550 628 12 113 226 339 452 566 679
Dr. Hazim Dwairi. Example: Continuous beam deflection
Example: Continuous beam deflection Analyze the short-term and ultimate long-term deflections of end-span of multi-span beam shown below. Ignore comp steel Beam spacing = 3000 mm b eff = 9000/4 = 2250
Chapter 4. Test results and discussion. 4.1 Introduction to Experimental Results
Chapter 4 Test results and discussion This chapter presents a discussion of the results obtained from eighteen beam specimens tested at the Structural Technology Laboratory of the Technical University
Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet jxxx 1 Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX Introduction Chd. 1 Grade 50 more common than Grade 43 because composite beam stiffness often 3 to 4 times non composite
NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD
NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD E mail: tamas.nagy gyorgy@upt.ro Tel: +40 256 403 935 Web: http://www.ct.upt.ro/users/tamasnagygyorgy/index.htm Office: A219 SIMPLE SUPORTED BEAM b = 15 cm h = 30 cm
K Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions
K Design Graphs and Charts for Raft Foundations Spanning Local Depressions The reader is advised to read the text in Chapter 13 before using these charts. The charts and figures are repeated here for quick
ε t increases from the compressioncontrolled Figure 9.15: Adjusted interaction diagram
CHAPTER NINE COLUMNS 4 b. The modified axial strength in compression is reduced to account for accidental eccentricity. The magnitude of axial force evaluated in step (a) is multiplied by 0.80 in case
Roadway Grade = m, amsl HWM = Roadway grade dictates elevation of superstructure and not minimum free board requirement.
Example on Design of Slab Bridge Design Data and Specifications Chapter 5 SUPERSTRUCTURES Superstructure consists of 10m slab, 36m box girder and 10m T-girder all simply supported. Only the design of Slab
B U I L D I N G D E S I G N
B U I L D I N G D E S I G N 10.1 DESIGN OF SLAB P R I O D E E P C H O W D H U R Y C E @ K 8. 0 1 7 6 9 4 4 1 8 3 DESIGN BY COEFFICIENT METHOD Loads: DL = 150 pc LL = 85 pc Material Properties: c = 3000
SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS
CHAPTER REINFORCED CONCRETE Reinforced Concrete Design A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition Fifth Edition SERVICEABILITY OF BEAMS AND ONE-WAY SLABS A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil
Parametric analysis and torsion design charts for axially restrained RC beams
Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 55, No. 1 (2015) 1-27 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.55.1.001 1 Parametric analysis and torsion design charts for axially restrained RC beams Luís F.A.
Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed
Prepared by : Date : Verified by : Date : Project : Ref Calculation Output Design of RCC Chimney :- 1) Dimensions of Chimney and Forces 200 Unit weight of Fire Brick Lining 19000 N/m3 100 Height of Fire
Assignment 1 - actions
Assignment 1 - actions b = 1,5 m a = 1 q kn/m 2 Determine action on the beam for verification of the ultimate limit state. Axial distance of the beams is 1 to 2 m, cross section dimensions 0,45 0,20 m
CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual
CivilBay Crane Load and Crane Runway Beam Design v1.0.0 User Manual (Alberta, Canada) Web: Tel: 1-403-510568 01-01-01 Rev 1.0.0 Page 1 of 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT... 3.0 QUICK
1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6
Page 3 Page 4 Substructure Design. ARRANGEMENT a. Frame A-P3 L = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m b. Frame P3-P6 L = 25 m H 3 = 8.39 m L 2 = 3 m H 4 = 8.5 m L
Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601 Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION Reinforced
Design of Beams (Unit - 8)
Design of Beams (Unit - 8) Contents Introduction Beam types Lateral stability of beams Factors affecting lateral stability Behaviour of simple and built - up beams in bending (Without vertical stiffeners)
CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams
CHAPTER 4 Design of R C Beams Learning Objectives Identify the data, formulae and procedures for design of R C beams Design simply-supported and continuous R C beams by integrating the following processes
3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection
CHAPER 3: Reinforced Concrete Slabs and Beams 3.4 Reinforced Concrete Beams - Size Selection Description his application calculates the spacing for shear reinforcement of a concrete beam supporting a uniformly
Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:
Serial : IG1_CE_G_Concrete Structures_100818 Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: E-mail: info@madeeasy.in Ph: 011-451461 CLASS TEST 018-19 CIVIL ENGINEERING
DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
DESIGN OF STAIRCASE Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction T N T G N G R h Flight Span, L Landing T = Thread
FRAME ANALYSIS. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
FRAME ANALYSIS Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Email: iznisyahrizal@utm.my Introduction 3D Frame: Beam, Column & Slab 2D Frame Analysis Building
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column BS8110
E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Job Title Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Column Effects From Structural Analysis Axial force, N (tension-ve and comp +ve) (ensure >= 0) 8000kN OK Major
Appendix K Design Examples
Appendix K Design Examples Example 1 * Two-Span I-Girder Bridge Continuous for Live Loads AASHTO Type IV I girder Zero Skew (a) Bridge Deck The bridge deck reinforcement using A615 rebars is shown below.
Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges
01/02/2016 Marco Donà Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges 1 Plastic hinge approach A plastic hinge represents a concentrated post-yield behaviour in one or more degrees of freedom. Hinges only
Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter
Chapter 1 Materials 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter A Area of concrete cross-section C s Constant depending on the type of curing C t Creep coefficient (C t = ε sp /ε i ) C u Ultimate creep coefficient
FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS
FLOW CHART FOR DESIGN OF BEAMS Write Known Data Estimate self-weight of the member. a. The self-weight may be taken as 10 percent of the applied dead UDL or dead point load distributed over all the length.
Practical Design to Eurocode 2
Practical Design to Eurocode 2 The webinar will start at 12.30 (Any questions beforehand? use Questions on the GoTo Control Panel) Course Outline Lecture Date Speaker Title 1 21 Sep Jenny Burridge Introduction,
Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN
Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1992-2 Validation Examples Brno, 21.10.2010 IDEA RS s.r.o. South Moravian Innovation Centre, U Vodarny 2a, 616 00 BRNO tel.: +420-511
DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: STEEL DECKING REPORT HOLDER: PNEUTEK, INC.
ICC ES Report ICC ES () 7 () www.icc es.org Most Widely Accepted and Trusted ESR 1 Reissued /1 This report is subject to renewal /. DIVISION: METALS SECTION: METAL FASTENINGS SECTION: 1 STEEL ING REPORT
Composite Beams DYB 654: ADVANCED STEEL STRUCTURES - II. Department of Earthquake and
DYB 654: ADVANCED STEEL STRUCTURES - II Assoc.Prof.Bülent AKBAŞ Crown Hall at IIT Campus Chicago. Illinois Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Department of Earthquake and Structuralt Engineering i Composite Beams
Serviceability Limit States
Serviceability Limit States www.eurocode2.info 1 Outline Crack control and limitations Crack width calculations Crack width calculation example Crack width calculation problem Restraint cracking Deflection
Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs
Lecture 7 Two-Way Slabs Two-way slabs have tension reinforcing spanning in BOTH directions, and may take the general form of one of the following: Types of Two-Way Slab Systems Lecture 7 Page 1 of 13 The
Design Beam Flexural Reinforcement
COPUTERS AND STRUCTURES, INC., BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA DECEBER 2001 CONCRETE FRAE DESIGN ACI-318-99 Technical Note This Technical Note describes how this program completes beam design when the ACI 318-99
Plastic design of continuous beams
Budapest University of Technology and Economics Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601 Lecture no. 4: Plastic design of continuous
Seismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8
1 Seismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8 Ioannis P. GIANNOPOULOS 1 Key words: Pushover analysis, FEMA 356, Eurocode 8, seismic assessment, plastic rotation, limit states
USER BULLETIN 3: DETERMINATION OF UNSUPPORTED LENGTH RATIO L/Db
USER BULLETIN 3: DETERMINATION OF UNSUPPORTED LENGTH RATIO L/Db The unsupported length ratio (L/Db) is calculated by the automatic Sectional modeler spreadsheet using Dhakal and Maekawa [1]. This method
Types of Structures & Loads
Structure Analysis I Chapter 4 1 Types of Structures & Loads 1Chapter Chapter 4 Internal lloading Developed in Structural Members Internal loading at a specified Point In General The loading for coplanar
Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2
Detailing Lecture 9 16 th November 2017 Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2 EC2 Section 8 - Detailing of Reinforcement - General Rules Bar spacing, Minimum bend diameter Anchorage of reinforcement
Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using wframe to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability.
DESCRIPTION Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using wframe to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability. Moment hinges are based on Caltrans material
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 1 General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD 2 AISC ASD and LRFD AISC ASD = American Institute of Steel Construction = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth
A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e
A q u a b l u e a t t h e G o l d e n M i l e H a t o R e y, P u e r t o R i c o G e n e r a l B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n Building Facts: 7-story parking structure + luxury apartments 900,000
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-
CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing Openings in RC Flexural Members- Assoc Pr Tan Kiang Hwee Department Civil Engineering National In this lecture DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
RETAINING WALL LOADS: Horizontal Equivalent Fluid Pressure = pcf. (Load Case = Soil)
QuickWall 8.0 - RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ================================================================================ Job ID : Job Description : Designed By : ================================================================================
ΙApostolos Konstantinidis Diaphragmatic behaviour. Volume B
Volume B 3.1.4 Diaphragmatic behaviour In general, when there is eccentric loading at a floor, e.g. imposed by the horizontal seismic action, the in-plane rigidity of the slab forces all the in-plane points
Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement
Lecture-05 Serviceability Requirements & Development of Reinforcement By: Prof Dr. Qaisar Ali Civil Engineering Department UET Peshawar drqaisarali@uetpeshawar.edu.pk www.drqaisarali.com 1 Section 1: Deflections
Load Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges
Presentation at 2003 TRB Meeting, Washington, D.C. UNIVERSITY Load Capacity Evaluation of Pennsylvania s Single Span T-Beam Bridges F. N. Catbas, A. E. Aktan, K. Ciloglu, O. Hasancebi, J. S. Popovics Drexel
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction
CHAPTER 2 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Introduction The primary purpose of structural analysis is to establish the distribution of internal forces and moments over the whole part of a structure and to identify
2D - STRIP ANCHOR LIFTING SYSTEM
2D - STRIP ANCHOR LIFTING SYSTEM WWW.TERWA.COM Terwa reserves the right to make changes to the documentation at any time Page 1 OVERVIEW LIFTING CLUTCHES AND TRANSPORT ANCHOR SA-B SA-ST SA-TTU UNIVERSAL
Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 2006/7
Civil Engineering Design (1) Analysis and Design of Slabs 006/7 Dr. Colin Caprani, Chartered Engineer 1 Contents 1. Elastic Methods... 3 1.1 Introduction... 3 1. Grillage Analysis... 4 1.3 Finite Element
999 TOWN & COUNTRY ROAD ORANGE, CALIFORNIA TITLE PUSHOVER ANALYSIS EXAMPLE BY R. MATTHEWS DATE 5/21/01
DESCRIPTION Nonlinear static (pushover) analysis will be performed on a railroad bridge bent using several methods to determine its ultimate lateral deflection capability. 1. SAP2000 Nonlinear with axial-moment
Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections
4 5000 4000 (increased d ) (increased f (increased A s or f y ) c or b) Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections Moment (kip-in.) 3000 2000 1000 0 0 (basic) (A s 0.5A s ) 0.0005 0.001 0.0015
CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS
(74) CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS This chapter will be devoted to the analysis of prismatic members subjected to equal and opposite couples M and M' acting in the same longitudinal plane. Such members are
Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 276 Spring Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy
Stress Analysis Lecture 4 ME 76 Spring 017-018 Dr./ Ahmed Mohamed Nagib Elmekawy Shear and Moment Diagrams Beam Sign Convention The positive directions are as follows: The internal shear force causes a
MODELING THE EFFECTIVE ELASTIC MODULUS OF RC BEAMS EXPOSED TO FIRE
Journal of Marine Science and Technology, Vol., No., pp. -8 () MODELING THE EFFECTIVE ELASTIC MODULUS OF RC BEAMS EXPOSED TO FIRE Jui-Hsiang Hsu*, ***, Cherng-Shing Lin**, and Chang-Bin Huang*** Key words:
Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 30 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of
Preferred practice on semi-integral abutment layout falls in the following order:
GENERAL INFORMATION: This section of the chapter establishes the practices and requirements necessary for the design and detailing of semi-integral abutments. For general requirements and guidelines on
UC Berkeley CE 123 Fall 2017 Instructor: Alan Kren
CE 123 - Reinforced Concrete Midterm Examination No. 2 Instructions: Read these instructions. Do not turn the exam over until instructed to do so. Work all problems. Pace yourself so that you have time
Software Verification
EXAMPLE 17 Crack Width Analyi The crack width, wk, i calculated uing the methodology decribed in the Eurocode EN 1992-1-1:2004, Section 7.3.4, which make ue of the following expreion: (1) w = ( ),max ε
CIV100 Mechanics. Module 5: Internal Forces and Design. by: Jinyue Zhang. By the end of this Module you should be able to:
CIV100 Mechanics Module 5: Internal Forces and Design by: Jinyue Zhang Module Objective By the end of this Module you should be able to: Find internal forces of any structural members Understand how Shear
- Rectangular Beam Design -
Semester 1 2016/2017 - Rectangular Beam Design - Department of Structures and Material Engineering Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Introduction The purposes
UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION
Introduction UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION A foundation is a integral part of the structure which transfer the load of the superstructure to the soil. A foundation is that member which provides support for
Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Beam BS8110 v Member Design - RC Beam XX
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Effects From Structural Analysis Design axial force, F (tension -ve and compression +ve) (ensure < 0.1f cu b w h 0
Structural Steel Design Project
Job No: Sheet 1 of 6 Rev Worked Example - 1 Made by Date 4-1-000 Checked by PU Date 30-4-000 Analyse the building frame shown in Fig. A using portal method. 15 kn C F I L 4 m 0 kn B E H K 6 m A D G J 4
Rigid and Braced Frames
RH 331 Note Set 12.1 F2014abn Rigid and raced Frames Notation: E = modulus of elasticit or Young s modulus F = force component in the direction F = force component in the direction FD = free bod diagram
Simulation of Nonlinear Behavior of Wall-Frame Structure during Earthquakes
Simulation of Nonlinear Behavior of Wall-Frame Structure during Earthquakes b Masaomi Teshigawara 1, Hiroshi Fukuama 2, Hiroto Kato 2, Taiki Saito 2, Koichi Kusunoki 2, Tomohisa Mukai 2 ABSTRACT The reinforced
Chapter 11. Displacement Method of Analysis Slope Deflection Method
Chapter 11 Displacement ethod of Analysis Slope Deflection ethod Displacement ethod of Analysis Two main methods of analyzing indeterminate structure Force method The method of consistent deformations
Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Reinforced Concrete Staircase BS8110
CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers jxxx 1 Material Properties Characteristic strength of concrete, f cu ( 60N/mm 2 ; HSC N/A) 25 N/mm 2 OK Yield strength of
UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2
UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Young s modulus E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2 Area1=900mm 2 Area2=400mm 2 Area3=625mm
Longitudinal strength standard
(1989) (Rev. 1 199) (Rev. Nov. 001) Longitudinal strength standard.1 Application This requirement applies only to steel ships of length 90 m and greater in unrestricted service. For ships having one or