,...,.,.,,.,...,.,...,...,.,.,...
|
|
- Willa Robbins
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Areas of Endemism The definitions and criteria for areas of endemism are complex issues (Linder 2001; Morrone 1994b; Platnick 1991; Szumik et al. 2002; Viloria 2005). There are severa1 definitions of areas of endemism:
2 Identificatioii of Biotic Components 67,...,.,.,,.,...,.,...,...,.,.,... Fairly small areas that have a significant number of species that occur nowhere else; areas delirnited by the coincident distributions of taxa that occur nowhere else (Nelson and Platnick 1981:390,468). An area of endemism can be defined by the congruent distributional limits of two or more species (Platnick 1991:xi). Geographic region comprising the distributions of two or more monophyletic taxa that exhibit a phylogenetic and distributional congruence and have their respective relatives occurring in other such defined regions (Harold and Mooi 1994:262). Areas of nonrandom distributional congruence between different taxa (Morrone 1994b:438). Areas defined by the distributions of endemic taxa occurring in those areas (Humphries and Parenti 1999:6). Areas delimited by the congruent distribution of at least two species of restricted range (Linder 2001:893). Areas delimited by barriers, the appearance of which entails the formation of species restricted by these barriers (Hausdorf 2002:648). Areas that have many different groups found there and nowhere else (Szumik et al ). Some of these definitions entail extensive sympatry (Platnick 1991), although this congruence does not demand complete agreement on those limits at a11 possible scales of mapping (Hausdorf 2002; Linder 2001; Morrone 1994b; Morrone and Crisci 1995; Wiley 1981). Some definitions derive explicitly from a vicariance model (Harold and Mooi 1994; Hausdorf 2002), whereas others are neutra1 (Morrone 1994b; Szumik et al. 2002). Some refer to species (Hausdorf 2002; Linder 2001; Platnick 1991) and others to taxa (Harold and Mooi 1994; Humphries and Parenti 1999; Morrone 1994b). How do we recognize an area of endemism? Muller (1973) suggested a protoc01 for working out "dispersa1 centers," which has been applied to identify areas of endemism (Morrone 1994b; Morrone et al. 1994). It consists basically of plotting the ranges of species on a map and finding the areas of congruence between severa1 species. This approach assumes that the species' ranges are small compared with the region itself, that the limits of the ranges are known with certainty, and that the validity of the species is not in dispute. According to Linder (2001), areas of endemism should meet four criteria: They must have at least two endemic species; the ranges of the species endemic to them should be maximally congruent; they should be narrower than the ~7hole study area, so that severa1 areas are located; and they should be mutually exclusive. Severa1 issues concerning areas of endemism should be addressed. Crisp et al. (1995) suggested that the alternative procedures for identifying areas of endemism were controversial, especially questioning whether the hierarchical model of parsirnony analysis of endemicity (PAE) was adequate for that purpose. Humphries and Parenti (1999) argued that including species that are ecologically very dif-
3 68 Identification of Biotic Components ferent can argue for a historical rather than ecological explanation for the areas of endemism identified. Linder (2001) proposed three optimality criteria to help choose the best estimate of the areas of endemism: the number of areas identified, the proportion of the species restricted to the areas of endemism, and the congruence of the distributions of the species restricted to the areas of endemism. Roig- Juiíent et al. (2002) enumerated some problems with the identification of areas of endemism: lack of distributional data, bias toward locality data, and subjectivity in drawing the exact limits of the areas of endemism.
4 Parsimony Analysis of Endemicity PAE is also known as parsimony analysis of shared presences (Rosen and Smith 1988), sirnplicity analysis of endemicity (Crisci et al. 2000), parsimony analysis of distributions (Trejo-Torres and Ackerman 2001), parsimony analysis of species sets (Trejo-Torres 2003), cladistic analysis of distributions and endemism (Porzecanski and Cracraft 2005), and parsimony analysis of community assemblages (Ribichich 2005). It was formulated originally by Rosen (1985) and fully developed by Rosen (198813) and Rosen and Smith (1988). PAE (fig. 4.12) constructs cladograrns based on the parsimony analysis of a presence-absence data matrix of species and supraspecific taxa (Cecca 2002; Cracraft 1991; Escalante and Morrone 2003; Morrone 1994a, 1994b, 1998; Myers 1991; Nihei 2006; Porzecanski and Cracraft 2005; Posadas and Miranda-Esquivel1999; Rosen 1988b; Rosen and Smith 1988; Trejo-Torres 2003). PAE cladograms may allow one to infer the three biogeographic processes: Synapomorphies are interpreted as vicariance events, parallelisms as dispersa1 events, and reversals as extinction events. Crisci et al. (2000) distinguished three variants of PAE according to the units analyzed: localities, areas of endemism, and grid cells. There are severa1 other
5 78 Identification of Biotic Components d e Figure 4.12 Parsimony analysis of endemicity. (a-c) Distributional maps of three species, with grid cells superimposed; (d) data matrix of grid cells x species; (e) cladogram of grid cells; (f) area of endemism obtained. - f units, such as hydrological basins (Aguilar-Aguilar et al. 2003), real and virtual islands (Luna-Vega et al. 1999, 2001; Maldonado and Uriz 1995; Trejo-Torres and Ackerman 2001)) transects (García-Trejo and Navarro 2004; León-Paniagua et al. 2004; Navarro et al. 2004; Trejo-Torres and Ackerman 2002), communities (Ribichich 2005)) and political entities (Cué-Bar et al. 2006). García-Barros (2003) proposed a more appropriate classification based on the objectives of the analysis: to der historical relationships between areas, to identify areas of endemism, and to classify areas (as a phenetic association method). In order to root the PAE cladograms, a hypothetical area with all "O" is added to the matrix. However, some authors (Cano and Gurrea 2003; Ribichich 2005) have used an area coded with a11 "1." This alternative rooting groups areas according to shared absences, which would imply depletion through time starting from a cosmopolitan biota (Cecca 2002). PAE may be used for panbiogeographic analyses, where the clades obtained are considered generalized tracks (Craw et al. 1999; Luna-Vega et al. 2000; Morrone and Márquez 2001). With the aim that the "1" appears only once and does not revert to "O" (as in a compatibility analysis), Luna-Vega et al. (1999) undertook the parsimony analysis with PAUP (Swofford 1999), setting Goloboff concavity k = O. Luna-Vega et al. (2000) and García-Barros et al. (2002) proposed that when the most parsimonious cladograms have been obtained, it is possible to remove or exclude the taxa supporting the different clades and analyze the reduced matrix to search for alternative clades supported by other taxa. This procedure has been named parsimony analysis of endemicity with progressive character elimination (PAE-PCE) (García-Barros 2003; García-Barros et al. 2002).
6 Identification of Biotic Components 79 Equal (nondifferential) weighting is usually used for PAE. However, Linder (2001) suggested a protocol to weight species inversely to their distribution areas so that widespread species do not obscure the analyses by introducing homoplasy into the data. It consists of four steps: 1. Weight each species in each grid cell by the inverse of its distribution range so that a species restricted to a grid cell would be scored as 1, a species restricted to two grid cells as 0.5, three grid cells as 0.33, and so forth. 2. Transform the values to a scale of 0-20, multiplying each by 20 and rounding the product. This results in a matrix with values of 20 (single-grid endemics), 10 (two-grid endemics), 7 (three-grid endemics), and so forth. 3. Simplify the matrix by changing the 20s and 10s to 9 (because single-grid species carry no grouping information in a parsimony analysis) so that each species will be represented by a single-digit value in each grid cell score. 4. Input the matrix into a parsiinony analysis, treating the characters' states (O to 9) as additive. PAE has received some criticism. Linder and Mann (1998) criticized Morrone's (1994b) approach for identifying areas of endemism with PAE because grid cells can be used only as presence-absence data, and undercollecting may result in grid cells being omitted. Some authors suggested that PAE is not a valid historical method because it does not take into account the phylogenetic relationships of the taxa analyzed (García-Barros et al. 2002; Humphries 1989,2000; Santos 2005). According to Rosen (1988b; see also Nihei 2006; Trejo-Torres 2003; Trejo-Torres and Ackerman 2002), there are two possible interpretations for PAE cladograms: static and dynamic. The former assumes that cladograms constitute an alternative to phenetic classification methods, whereas according to the latter, cladograms are hypotheses on the historical or ecological relationships of the areas analyzed. If we interpret the external area with a11 "O" as an area lacking suitable conditions for the taxa to survive therein (ecological interpretation), relationships will indicate ecological affinities. If we interpret the external area as a geologicaíly ancient area, where none of the taxa has yet evolved (historical interpretation), relationships will indicate biotic interchanges or vicariance events. Most of the authors who have used PAE explored historical interpretations of the detected patterns, usually from a vicariance viewpoint; for ecological interpretations, see Trejo-Torres and Ackerman (2002), Trejo-Torres (2003), and Ribichich (2005). Enghoff (2000) considered PAE an extreme "assumption 0" approach because only the widespread taxa provide evidence of area relationships. Morrone and Márquez (2001) and Brooks (2005) considered PAE an incomplete implementation of Brooks parsimony analysis (BPA). Szumik et al. (2002) criticized the use of PAE for identifying areas of endemism because an explicit optimality criterion is used a posteriori to select areas of endemism found by what they considered less appropriate means. Brooks and Van Veller (2003) criticized the use of PAE as a cladistic biogeographic method, which is erroneous because it has a different objective.
7 80 Identification of Biotic Components Parenti and Humphries (2004) suggested that PAE adopts protocols directly from phylogenetic systematics and violates some of the basic assumptions of cladistic biogeography. Nihei (2006) presented a revision of PAE, including a discussion of its history and applications. He suggested that most of the criticisms dealt with its method rather than its theory and that they usually resulted from the conf~ision between the dynamic and static approaches. Nihei warned biogeographers applying PAE to be aware of the problems and limitations of both dynamic and static PAE and to evaluate new variations of PAE. Algorithm PAE-PCE consists of the following steps (Craw 1989b; Crisci et al. 2000; Grehan 2001c; Lomolino et al. 2006; Morrone 1994b, 2004b; Posadas and Miranda- Esquive1 1999; Vargas 2002): 1. Construct an r x c matrix, where r (rows) represents the units analyzed (e.g., localities, distributional areas, grid cells) and c (columns) represents the taxa. Each entry is "1" or "0," depending o11 whether the taxon is present or absent in the locality. A hypothetical area coded with a11 "O" is added to the matrix in order to root the resulting cladograms. 2. Analyze the matrix with a parsimony algorithm. If more than one cladogram is found, calculate the strict consensus cladogram. 3. Connect on a map the area relationships supported by tn70 or more-taxa as generalized tracks or areas of endemism. 4. Remove the taxa supporting the previous generalized tracks or areas of endemism. 5. Repeat steps 24 until no more taxa support any clade. Software Hennig86 (Farris 1988), PHYLIP (Felsenstein 1993), NONA (Goloboff 1998), PAUP (Swofford 2003), Pee-Wee (Goloboff, available at /wt\7w.zmuc. dk/public/phylogeny/nona-peewee/), and TNT (Goloboff et al., retrieved May 25,2008, from For reading and editing data files and cladograms: Winclada (Nixon 1999), compatible with NONA, Pee-Wee, and Hennig86; and MacClade (Maddison and Maddison, retrieved May 25,2008, from compatible with PAUP.
8 Endemicity Ana lysis Szumik et al. (2002) proposed a method that takes into consideration the spatial position of the species in order to identify the set of grid cells that represent an optimal area of endemism according to a score based on the number of species endemic to it (Szumik and Roig-Jufient 2005). In order to assign the values of endemicity to the sets of grid cells evaluated, Szumik et al. (2002) suggested four criteria (fig. 4.15a4.15d): 1. First criterion (fig. 4.15a): The distribution of a species must adjust perfectly to the area to contribute to the score, so it must be present in a11 the grid cells of the set. 2. Second criterion (fig. 4.15b): A species can contribute to the score if it is present in some grid cells outside the area as long as the cell is adjacent to the area. This criterion does not require that a11 species contributing to the score have identical distributions. 3. Third criterion (fig. 4.15~): It is not required that a11 the grid cells of the set have identical species composition, but only species occurring in each one of the cells contribute to the score. 4. Fourth criterion (fig. 4.15d): A species may be absent from a given cell but still contribute to the score. Only a species that is evenly distributed in the area satisfies this criterion. Szumik and Goloboff (2004) developed an endemicity value that gives weight to each species, considering its adjustment to the evaluated area. The degree of adjustrnent between the distributional area of each species and the area of endemism
9 Identification of Biotic Components 87 Figirre 4.15 Assignrnent of scores under different criteria in endemicity analysis. (a) Area with score 3 under the first criterion (contributed by the three species); (b) area with score 2 under the second criterion (in addition to species "circle," species "square" contributes to the score); (c) area with score 2 under the third criterion (species"triangle" does not contribute to the score because it is found only in some cells); (d) area with score 4 under the fourth criterion (the four species contribute to the score, although none of them is found in a11 the cells). under evaluation depends on the relationship between the number of grid cells where it is found and the total number of grid cells. Additionally, the endemicity value increases with the number of grid cells where the presence of the species is assumed or inferred and decreases with the number of grid cells outside the area of endemism where the species is observed or assumed to be present (Szumik and Goloboff 2004). Algorithm It consists of the following steps (Szumik et al. 2002,2006; Szumik and Goloboff 2004; Szumik and Roig-Juííent 2005): 1. Plot species localities on a map with a grid. 2. Assign values of endemicity to a11 possible sets of grid cells, counting the species that may be considered endemic to them according to the four criteria defined by Szumik et al. (2002). 3. Choose the sets of grid cells with the highest endemicity scores. 4. Draw the sets of grid cells on a map as areas of endemism. Software NDM and VNDM (Goloboff 2004; Szumik et al. 2006).
Reconstructing the history of lineages
Reconstructing the history of lineages Class outline Systematics Phylogenetic systematics Phylogenetic trees and maps Class outline Definitions Systematics Phylogenetic systematics/cladistics Systematics
More informationMarco G.P. van Veller, b Eric P. Hoberg, c and Daniel R. Brooks d
Cladistics Cladistics 19 (2003) 240 253 www.elsevier.com/locate/yclad A priori and a posteriori methods in comparative evolutionary studies of host parasite associations Ashley P.G. Dowling, a, * Marco
More informationUnits in Biogeography
648 SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY VOL. 51 Syst. Biol. 51(4):648 652, 2002 DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102320 Units in Biogeography BERNHARD HAUSDORF Zoologisches Institut und Zoologisches Museum der Universität Hamburg,
More informationBiotic Element Analysis in Biogeography
Syst. Biol. 52(5):717 723, 2003 Copyright c Society of Systematic Biologists ISSN: 1063-5157 print / 1076-836X online DOI: 10.1080/10635150390235584 Biotic Element Analysis in Biogeography BERNHARD HAUSDORF
More informationOntology of areas of endemism
Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2011) GUEST EDITORIAL Ontology of areas of endemism Brian I. Crother* and Christopher M. Murray Department of Biological Sciences, Southeastern Louisiana University,
More informationESS 345 Ichthyology. Systematic Ichthyology Part II Not in Book
ESS 345 Ichthyology Systematic Ichthyology Part II Not in Book Thought for today: Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else,
More informationSpecies diversification in space: biogeographic patterns
Species diversification in space: biogeographic patterns Outline Endemism and cosmopolitanism Disjunctions Biogeographic regions Barriers and interchanges Divergence and convergence Biogeographic patterns
More information(Stevens 1991) 1. morphological characters should be assumed to be quantitative unless demonstrated otherwise
Bot 421/521 PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS I. Origins A. Hennig 1950 (German edition) Phylogenetic Systematics 1966 B. Zimmerman (Germany, 1930 s) C. Wagner (Michigan, 1920-2000) II. Characters and character states
More informationCORRESPONDENCE. Forum on historical biogeography: what is cladistic biogeography?
Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2005) 32, 2179 2187 CORRESPONDENCE Forum on historical biogeography: what is cladistic biogeography? J. J. Morrone: Several papers published recently in this journal
More informationUsing a Null Model to Recognize Significant Co-Occurrence Prior to Identifying Candidate Areas of Endemism
2003 POINTS OF VIEW 271 EDMONDS, D., AND J. EIDINOW. 2001. Wittgenstein s poker. Harper- Collins, New York. EDWARDS, A. W. F. 1992. Likelihood. Expanded edition. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
More informationThe Importance of Time/Space in Diagnosing the Causality of Phylogenetic Events: Towards a Chronobiogeographical Paradigm?
Syst. Biol. 50(3):391 407, 2001 The Importance of Time/Space in Diagnosing the Causality of Phylogenetic Events: Towards a Chronobiogeographical Paradigm? CRAIG ANDREW HUNN AND PAUL UPCHURCH Department
More information"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2009 University of California, Berkeley
"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2009 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler Jan. 22, 2009. Trees I. Summary of previous lecture: Hennigian
More informationPhylogenetic Analysis
Phylogenetic Analysis Aristotle Through classification, one might discover the essence and purpose of species. Nelson & Platnick (1981) Systematics and Biogeography Carl Linnaeus Swedish botanist (1700s)
More informationPhylogenetic Analysis
Phylogenetic Analysis Aristotle Through classification, one might discover the essence and purpose of species. Nelson & Platnick (1981) Systematics and Biogeography Carl Linnaeus Swedish botanist (1700s)
More informationPhylogenetic Analysis
Phylogenetic Analysis Aristotle Through classification, one might discover the essence and purpose of species. Nelson & Platnick (1981) Systematics and Biogeography Carl Linnaeus Swedish botanist (1700s)
More informationHistorical Biogeography. Historical Biogeography. Systematics
Historical Biogeography I. Definitions II. Fossils: problems with fossil record why fossils are important III. Phylogeny IV. Phenetics VI. Phylogenetic Classification Disjunctions debunked: Examples VII.
More informationCladistic biogeography and the art of discovery
Journal of Biogeography, 29, 427 444 Cladistic biogeography and the art of discovery GUEST EDITORIAL ABSTRACT Aims Cladistic biogeography is about discovering geographical congruence. The agreement of
More informationIntegrating Fossils into Phylogenies. Throughout the 20th century, the relationship between paleontology and evolutionary biology has been strained.
IB 200B Principals of Phylogenetic Systematics Spring 2011 Integrating Fossils into Phylogenies Throughout the 20th century, the relationship between paleontology and evolutionary biology has been strained.
More informationIB 200B Phylogenetics 21 April II. Vicariance Biogeography
II. Vicariance Biogeography The breakthrough in the application of cladistic reasoning to biogeography was led by the ichthyologists Gary Nelson and Donn Rosen at the American Museum of Natural History
More informationWorkshop: Biosystematics
Workshop: Biosystematics by Julian Lee (revised by D. Krempels) Biosystematics (sometimes called simply "systematics") is that biological sub-discipline that is concerned with the theory and practice of
More informationInput data, analytical methods and biogeography of Elegia (Restionaceae)
Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2006) 33, 47 62 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Input data, analytical methods and biogeography of Elegia (Restionaceae) P. M. Moline* and H. P. Linder Institute of Systematic
More informationLecture V Phylogeny and Systematics Dr. Kopeny
Delivered 1/30 and 2/1 Lecture V Phylogeny and Systematics Dr. Kopeny Lecture V How to Determine Evolutionary Relationships: Concepts in Phylogeny and Systematics Textbook Reading: pp 425-433, 435-437
More informationComputational aspects of host parasite phylogenies Jamie Stevens Date received (in revised form): 14th June 2004
Jamie Stevens is a lecturer in parasitology and evolution in the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter. His research interests in molecular evolutionary parasitology range from human
More information8/23/2014. Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Chapter 26 Objectives Explain the following characteristics of the Linnaean system of classification: a. binomial nomenclature b. hierarchical classification List the major
More information--Therefore, congruence among all postulated homologies provides a test of any single character in question [the central epistemological advance].
Integrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2008 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler Jan. 29, 2008. The Hennig Principle: Homology, Synapomorphy, Rooting issues The fundamental
More informationBIOL 428: Introduction to Systematics Midterm Exam
Midterm exam page 1 BIOL 428: Introduction to Systematics Midterm Exam Please, write your name on each page! The exam is worth 150 points. Verify that you have all 8 pages. Read the questions carefully,
More informationClassification, Phylogeny yand Evolutionary History
Classification, Phylogeny yand Evolutionary History The diversity of life is great. To communicate about it, there must be a scheme for organization. There are many species that would be difficult to organize
More information"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2011 University of California, Berkeley
"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2011 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler March 31, 2011. Reticulation,"Phylogeography," and Population Biology:
More informationHarvesting and harnessing data for biogeographical research
How do we know what grows where? Harvesting and harnessing data for biogeographical research A. Geography Tree B. Species Tree inventories and surveys natural areas, preserves, state forests, private properties
More informationPOPULATION GENETICS Winter 2005 Lecture 17 Molecular phylogenetics
POPULATION GENETICS Winter 2005 Lecture 17 Molecular phylogenetics - in deriving a phylogeny our goal is simply to reconstruct the historical relationships between a group of taxa. - before we review the
More informationHistorical Biogeography: Evolution in Time and Space
Evo Edu Outreach (2012) 5:555 568 DOI 10.1007/s12052-012-0421-2 GEOGRAPHY AND EVOLUTION Historical Biogeography: Evolution in Time and Space Isabel Sanmartín Published online: 21 June 2012 # Springer Science+Business
More informationThe Life System and Environmental & Evolutionary Biology II
The Life System and Environmental & Evolutionary Biology II EESC V2300y / ENVB W2002y Laboratory 1 (01/28/03) Systematics and Taxonomy 1 SYNOPSIS In this lab we will give an overview of the methodology
More informationEvaluating phylogenetic hypotheses
Evaluating phylogenetic hypotheses Methods for evaluating topologies Topological comparisons: e.g., parametric bootstrapping, constrained searches Methods for evaluating nodes Resampling techniques: bootstrapping,
More informationOutline. Classification of Living Things
Outline Classification of Living Things Chapter 20 Mader: Biology 8th Ed. Taxonomy Binomial System Species Identification Classification Categories Phylogenetic Trees Tracing Phylogeny Cladistic Systematics
More informationIntroduction to characters and parsimony analysis
Introduction to characters and parsimony analysis Genetic Relationships Genetic relationships exist between individuals within populations These include ancestordescendent relationships and more indirect
More informationESTIMATION OF CONSERVATISM OF CHARACTERS BY CONSTANCY WITHIN BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS
ESTIMATION OF CONSERVATISM OF CHARACTERS BY CONSTANCY WITHIN BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS JAMES S. FARRIS Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Accepted March 30, 1966 The concept of conservatism
More informationRECONSTRUCTING THE HISTORY OF HOST-PARASITE ASSOCIATIONS USING GENF, RAIJRED PARSIMONY
Cladistics (1995) 11:73-89 RECONSTRUCTING THE HISTORY OF HOST-PARASITE ASSOCIATIONS USING GENF, RAIJRED PARSIMONY Fredrik Ronquist Department of Entomology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007,
More informationC3020 Molecular Evolution. Exercises #3: Phylogenetics
C3020 Molecular Evolution Exercises #3: Phylogenetics Consider the following sequences for five taxa 1-5 and the known outgroup O, which has the ancestral states (note that sequence 3 has changed from
More informationIntegrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2008
Integrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2008 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler March 18, 2008. Phylogenetic Trees I: Reconstruction; Models, Algorithms & Assumptions
More informationOEB 181: Systematics. Catalog Number: 5459
OEB 181: Systematics Catalog Number: 5459 Tu & Th, 10-11:30 am, MCZ 202 Wednesdays, 2-4 pm, Science Center 418D Gonzalo Giribet (Biolabs 1119, ggiribet@oeb.harvard.edu) Charles Marshall (MCZ 111A, cmarshall@fas.harvard.edu
More informationBiology 1B Evolution Lecture 2 (February 26, 2010) Natural Selection, Phylogenies
1 Natural Selection (Darwin-Wallace): There are three conditions for natural selection: 1. Variation: Individuals within a population have different characteristics/traits (or phenotypes). 2. Inheritance:
More informationWhat is Phylogenetics
What is Phylogenetics Phylogenetics is the area of research concerned with finding the genetic connections and relationships between species. The basic idea is to compare specific characters (features)
More informationAP Biology. Cladistics
Cladistics Kingdom Summary Review slide Review slide Classification Old 5 Kingdom system Eukaryote Monera, Protists, Plants, Fungi, Animals New 3 Domain system reflects a greater understanding of evolution
More informationMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61 (2011) 177 191 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Spurious 99% bootstrap
More informationBiology 211 (2) Week 1 KEY!
Biology 211 (2) Week 1 KEY Chapter 1 KEY FIGURES: 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7 VOCABULARY: Adaptation: a trait that increases the fitness Cells: a developed, system bound with a thin outer layer made of
More informationIntegrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2012 University of California, Berkeley
Integrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2012 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler April 10, 2012: Species Concepts I. Importance of the species problem: a. nomenclatorial
More informationPhylogenetic methods in molecular systematics
Phylogenetic methods in molecular systematics Niklas Wahlberg Stockholm University Acknowledgement Many of the slides in this lecture series modified from slides by others www.dbbm.fiocruz.br/james/lectures.html
More informationIntegrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2012 University of California, Berkeley
Integrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2012 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler April 12, 2012. Phylogenetic trees IX: Below the "species level;" phylogeography; dealing
More informationSystematics - Bio 615
Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference 1. Introduction, history 2. Advantages over ML 3. Bayes Rule 4. The Priors 5. Marginal vs Joint estimation 6. MCMC Derek S. Sikes University of Alaska 7. Posteriors vs Bootstrap
More informationConstructing Evolutionary/Phylogenetic Trees
Constructing Evolutionary/Phylogenetic Trees 2 broad categories: Distance-based methods Ultrametric Additive: UPGMA Transformed Distance Neighbor-Joining Character-based Maximum Parsimony Maximum Likelihood
More informationIntegrative Biology 200 "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2016 University of California, Berkeley. Parsimony & Likelihood [draft]
Integrative Biology 200 "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2016 University of California, Berkeley K.W. Will Parsimony & Likelihood [draft] 1. Hennig and Parsimony: Hennig was not concerned with parsimony
More informationSystematics Lecture 3 Characters: Homology, Morphology
Systematics Lecture 3 Characters: Homology, Morphology I. Introduction Nearly all methods of phylogenetic analysis rely on characters as the source of data. A. Character variation is coded into a character-by-taxon
More informationLaboratory IV Phylogenetic Reconstruction
Laboratory IV Phylogenetic Reconstruction Objective: In this week s lab you will learn how to reconstruct evolutionary relationships. Biologists have experimented with a variety of methods for interpreting
More informationIs the equal branch length model a parsimony model?
Table 1: n approximation of the probability of data patterns on the tree shown in figure?? made by dropping terms that do not have the minimal exponent for p. Terms that were dropped are shown in red;
More informationHow should we organize the diversity of animal life?
How should we organize the diversity of animal life? The difference between Taxonomy Linneaus, and Cladistics Darwin What are phylogenies? How do we read them? How do we estimate them? Classification (Taxonomy)
More informationChapter 19 Organizing Information About Species: Taxonomy and Cladistics
Chapter 19 Organizing Information About Species: Taxonomy and Cladistics An unexpected family tree. What are the evolutionary relationships among a human, a mushroom, and a tulip? Molecular systematics
More informationToward an Integrative Historical Biogeography 1
INTEGR. COMP. BIOL., 43:261 270 (2003) Toward an Integrative Historical Biogeography 1 MICHAEL J. DONOGHUE 2 AND BRIAN R. MOORE Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, P.O. Box
More informationThe practice of naming and classifying organisms is called taxonomy.
Chapter 18 Key Idea: Biologists use taxonomic systems to organize their knowledge of organisms. These systems attempt to provide consistent ways to name and categorize organisms. The practice of naming
More informationName. Ecology & Evolutionary Biology 2245/2245W Exam 2 1 March 2014
Name 1 Ecology & Evolutionary Biology 2245/2245W Exam 2 1 March 2014 1. Use the following matrix of nucleotide sequence data and the corresponding tree to answer questions a. through h. below. (16 points)
More informationBiogeography. An ecological and evolutionary approach SEVENTH EDITION. C. Barry Cox MA, PhD, DSc and Peter D. Moore PhD
Biogeography An ecological and evolutionary approach C. Barry Cox MA, PhD, DSc and Peter D. Moore PhD Division of Life Sciences, King's College London, Fmnklin-Wilkins Building, Stamford Street, London
More informationChapter 22: Descent with Modification 1. BRIEFLY summarize the main points that Darwin made in The Origin of Species.
AP Biology Chapter Packet 7- Evolution Name Chapter 22: Descent with Modification 1. BRIEFLY summarize the main points that Darwin made in The Origin of Species. 2. Define the following terms: a. Natural
More informationRatio of explanatory power (REP): A new measure of group support
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44 (2007) 483 487 Short communication Ratio of explanatory power (REP): A new measure of group support Taran Grant a, *, Arnold G. Kluge b a Division of Vertebrate
More informationarxiv: v1 [q-bio.pe] 6 Jun 2013
Hide and see: placing and finding an optimal tree for thousands of homoplasy-rich sequences Dietrich Radel 1, Andreas Sand 2,3, and Mie Steel 1, 1 Biomathematics Research Centre, University of Canterbury,
More informationPCB6675C, BOT6935, ZOO6927 Evolutionary Biogeography Spring 2014
PCB6675C, BOT6935, ZOO6927 Evolutionary Biogeography Spring 2014 Credits: 3 Schedule: Wednesdays and Fridays, 4 th & 5 th Period (10:40 am - 12:35 pm) Location: Carr 221 Instructors Dr. Nico Cellinese
More informationSystematics - BIO 615
A Knyght ther was, and that a worthy man, A Knyght ther was, and he was a worthy man, A Knyght ther was, and that a worthy man, A Knyght ther was, and he was a worthy man, A Knyght ther was, and he wasn
More informationPhylogeny 9/8/2014. Evolutionary Relationships. Data Supporting Phylogeny. Chapter 26
Phylogeny Chapter 26 Taxonomy Taxonomy: ordered division of organisms into categories based on a set of characteristics used to assess similarities and differences Carolus Linnaeus developed binomial nomenclature,
More informationPhylogenies & Classifying species (AKA Cladistics & Taxonomy) What are phylogenies & cladograms? How do we read them? How do we estimate them?
Phylogenies & Classifying species (AKA Cladistics & Taxonomy) What are phylogenies & cladograms? How do we read them? How do we estimate them? Carolus Linneaus:Systema Naturae (1735) Swedish botanist &
More informationThree-taxon statement analysis and its relation with primary data: Implications for cladistics and biogeography
Implications of three-taxon statement analysis for cladistics and biogeography 171 Three-taxon statement analysis and its relation with primary data: Implications for cladistics and biogeography Three-taxon
More informationConsensus methods. Strict consensus methods
Consensus methods A consensus tree is a summary of the agreement among a set of fundamental trees There are many consensus methods that differ in: 1. the kind of agreement 2. the level of agreement Consensus
More informationComparative Bioinformatics Midterm II Fall 2004
Comparative Bioinformatics Midterm II Fall 2004 Objective Answer, part I: For each of the following, select the single best answer or completion of the phrase. (3 points each) 1. Deinococcus radiodurans
More informationTestability and the Refutation and Corroboration of Cladistic Hypotheses
Cladistics 13, 81 96 (1997) WWW http://www.apnet.com Testability and the Refutation and Corroboration of Cladistic Hypotheses Arnold G. Kluge Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109,
More informationLecture 6 Phylogenetic Inference
Lecture 6 Phylogenetic Inference From Darwin s notebook in 1837 Charles Darwin Willi Hennig From The Origin in 1859 Cladistics Phylogenetic inference Willi Hennig, Cladistics 1. Clade, Monophyletic group,
More informationNeed for systematics. Applications of systematics. Linnaeus plus Darwin. Approaches in systematics. Principles of cladistics
Topics Need for systematics Applications of systematics Linnaeus plus Darwin Approaches in systematics Principles of cladistics Systematics pp. 474-475. Systematics - Study of diversity and evolutionary
More informationAlgorithmic Methods Well-defined methodology Tree reconstruction those that are well-defined enough to be carried out by a computer. Felsenstein 2004,
Tracing the Evolution of Numerical Phylogenetics: History, Philosophy, and Significance Adam W. Ferguson Phylogenetic Systematics 26 January 2009 Inferring Phylogenies Historical endeavor Darwin- 1837
More informationConsensus Methods. * You are only responsible for the first two
Consensus Trees * consensus trees reconcile clades from different trees * consensus is a conservative estimate of phylogeny that emphasizes points of agreement * philosophy: agreement among data sets is
More informationMarcio Bernardino DaSilva a, *, Ricardo Pinto-da-Rocha b and Adriano Medeiros DeSouza a. Accepted 27 March 2015
Cladistics Cladistics (2015) 1 14 10.1111/cla.12121 A protocol for the delimitation of areas of endemism and the historical regionalization of the Brazilian Atlantic Rain Forest using harvestmen distribution
More informationTypes of spatial data. The Nature of Geographic Data. Types of spatial data. Spatial Autocorrelation. Continuous spatial data: geostatistics
The Nature of Geographic Data Types of spatial data Continuous spatial data: geostatistics Samples may be taken at intervals, but the spatial process is continuous e.g. soil quality Discrete data Irregular:
More informationWhy biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported
Volume 47(4):63-73, 2007 Why biogeographical hypotheses need a well supported phylogenetic framework: a conceptual evaluation Charles Morphy D. Santos 1,2 Dalton S. Amorim 1,3 Abstract A growing number
More information"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2011 University of California, Berkeley
"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2011 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler March 29, 2011. "Speciation" (diversification) and related issues:
More informationQuestions we can ask. Recall. Accuracy and Precision. Systematics - Bio 615. Outline
Outline 1. Mechanistic comparison with Parsimony - branch lengths & parameters 2. Performance comparison with Parsimony - Desirable attributes of a method - The Felsenstein and Farris zones - Heterotachous
More informationSpeciation. Today s OUTLINE: Mechanisms of Speciation. Mechanisms of Speciation. Geographic Models of speciation. (1) Mechanisms of Speciation
Speciation Today s OUTLINE: (1) Geographic Mechanisms of Speciation (What circumstances lead to the formation of new species?) (2) Species Concepts (How are Species Defined?) Mechanisms of Speciation Last
More informationAmira A. AL-Hosary PhD of infectious diseases Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Assiut
Amira A. AL-Hosary PhD of infectious diseases Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Assiut University-Egypt Phylogenetic analysis Phylogenetic Basics: Biological
More informationSpeciation. Today s OUTLINE: Mechanisms of Speciation. Mechanisms of Speciation. Geographic Models of speciation. (1) Mechanisms of Speciation
Speciation Today s OUTLINE: (1) Geographic Mechanisms of Speciation (What circumstances lead to the formation of new species?) (2) Species Concepts (How are Species Defined?) Mechanisms of Speciation Last
More informationBiotic element analysis of reptiles of China: A test of vicariance model
Current Zoology 59 (4): 449 457, 2013 Biotic element analysis of reptiles of China: A test of vicariance model Youhua CHEN * Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, V6T
More informationImpact of errors on cladistic inference: simulation-based comparison between parsimony and three-taxon analysis
Impact of errors on cladistic inference: simulation-based comparison between parsimony and three-taxon analysis Valentin Rineau, René Zaragüeta I Bagils, Michel Laurin To cite this version: Valentin Rineau,
More informationUse of dispersal vicariance analysis in biogeography a critique
Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2010) 37, 3 11 SPECIAL PAPER Use of dispersal vicariance analysis in biogeography a critique Ullasa Kodandaramaiah* Department of Zoology, Stockholm University,
More informationSupplementary Materials for
advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1/8/e1500527/dc1 Supplementary Materials for A phylogenomic data-driven exploration of viral origins and evolution The PDF file includes: Arshan Nasir and Gustavo
More informationChapter 26: Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Phylogenies Show Evolutionary Relationships
Chapter 26: Phylogeny and the Tree of Life You Must Know The taxonomic categories and how they indicate relatedness. How systematics is used to develop phylogenetic trees. How to construct a phylogenetic
More informationThe Information Content of Trees and Their Matrix Representations
2004 POINTS OF VIEW 989 Syst. Biol. 53(6):989 1001, 2004 Copyright c Society of Systematic Biologists ISSN: 1063-5157 print / 1076-836X online DOI: 10.1080/10635150490522737 The Information Content of
More informationInferring phylogeny. Today s topics. Milestones of molecular evolution studies Contributions to molecular evolution
Today s topics Inferring phylogeny Introduction! Distance methods! Parsimony method!"#$%&'(!)* +,-.'/01!23454(6!7!2845*0&4'9#6!:&454(6 ;?@AB=C?DEF Overview of phylogenetic inferences Methodology Methods
More informationWeighted compromise trees: a method to summarize competing phylogenetic hypotheses
Cladistics Cladistics 29 (2013) 309 314 10.1111/cla.12000 Weighted compromise trees: a method to summarize competing phylogenetic hypotheses Michael J. Sharkey a, *, Stephanie Stoelb a, Daniel R. Miranda-Esquivel
More informationDr. Amira A. AL-Hosary
Phylogenetic analysis Amira A. AL-Hosary PhD of infectious diseases Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Assiut University-Egypt Phylogenetic Basics: Biological
More informationNon-independence in Statistical Tests for Discrete Cross-species Data
J. theor. Biol. (1997) 188, 507514 Non-independence in Statistical Tests for Discrete Cross-species Data ALAN GRAFEN* AND MARK RIDLEY * St. John s College, Oxford OX1 3JP, and the Department of Zoology,
More informationSophisticated falsification and research cycles: Consequences for differential character weighting in p h y I o g e n et ic system at ics
Pergamon Zoologica Scripta, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 349-360, 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd 01998 The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain PII: S0300-3256(97)00029-9
More informationCHAPTERS 24-25: Evidence for Evolution and Phylogeny
CHAPTERS 24-25: Evidence for Evolution and Phylogeny 1. For each of the following, indicate how it is used as evidence of evolution by natural selection or shown as an evolutionary trend: a. Paleontology
More informationSpeciation. Today s OUTLINE: Mechanisms of Speciation. Mechanisms of Speciation. Geographic Models of speciation. (1) Mechanisms of Speciation
Speciation Today s OUTLINE: (1) Geographic Mechanisms of Speciation (What circumstances lead to the formation of new species?) (2) Species Concepts (How are Species Defined?) Mechanisms of Speciation Last
More informationCinclosoma -species limits - -development of a true phylogeny- hindered because of the relational concept of BS.
- - Biosystematics and Nomenclature. Phylogenetic Species Concept. Biological Species. Cracraft. Mayr. --- Coehesive Species Concepts. vs Historical Species Concepts. *Cracraft's ideas: Conspecificity
More informationX X (2) X Pr(X = x θ) (3)
Notes for 848 lecture 6: A ML basis for compatibility and parsimony Notation θ Θ (1) Θ is the space of all possible trees (and model parameters) θ is a point in the parameter space = a particular tree
More informationA data based parsimony method of cophylogenetic analysis
Blackwell Science, Ltd A data based parsimony method of cophylogenetic analysis KEVIN P. JOHNSON, DEVIN M. DROWN & DALE H. CLAYTON Accepted: 20 October 2000 Johnson, K. P., Drown, D. M. & Clayton, D. H.
More informationLetter to the Editor. Department of Biology, Arizona State University
Letter to the Editor Traditional Phylogenetic Reconstruction Methods Reconstruct Shallow and Deep Evolutionary Relationships Equally Well Michael S. Rosenberg and Sudhir Kumar Department of Biology, Arizona
More information