NATIONAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION STANDARD, VERSION 2 WORKING DRAFT

Transcription

1 NATIONAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION STANDARD, VERSION 2 WORKING DRAFT Subcommittee Federal Geographic Data Committee SUMMMARY NatureServe version 31 August 2006 INTRODUCTION The United States Federal Geographic Data Committee (hereafter called the FGDC) is tasked to develop geospatial data standards that will enable sharing of spatial data among producers and users. In 1997, the FGDC Subcommittee developed a National Classification (NVC) Standard (FGDC-STD ). This document is a proposed revision of the 1997 standard and, if approved, will replace that document. Prior to formal submission, the document is being sent for review to federal agency and non-agency partners. The standards were developed in consultation with guidelines provided by the Ecological Society of America s Classification Panel and from the subcommittee s Hierarchy Revisions Working Group. The standard requires that vegetation types be defined and characterized using appropriate data. New vegetation types will be defined and previously defined types will be refined as data continue to be collected, analyzed, and correlated over time. This process is referred to as successive refinement (or successive approximation). Managing the vegetation classification (content standard) dynamically as the classification process is implemented will allow development of the national vegetation classification system (i.e., data classification standard) to proceed efficiently. The overall purpose of this National Classification Standard (hereafter referred to as the Standard ) is to support the development and use of a consistent national vegetation classification (hereafter referred to as the NVC ) in order to produce uniform statistics about vegetation resources across the nation, based on vegetation data gathered at local, regional, or national levels. This will facilitate cooperation on vegetation management issues that transcend jurisdictional boundaries. It is therefore important that, as agencies map or inventory vegetation, they collect enough data to translate it for national reporting, aggregation, and comparisons. The ability to crosswalk other vegetation classifications and map legends to the NVC will facilitate the compilation of regional and national summaries. SCOPE This Standard establishes national procedures for classifying existing vegetation for the United States and its Trust Territories that shall be used by Federal agencies to share vegetation information and Announcements January 2007

2 Announcements report national statistics. Existing vegetation is the plant cover, or floristic composition and vegetation structure, documented to occur at a specific location and time. APPLICABILITY Each Federal agency is free to develop vegetation classification systems that meet their own information and business needs. The ecological characteristics of such local vegetation types can help guide the design of map legends (sets of map units) to address varying land management issues at multiple spatial scales. The NVC is expected to provide the common link to compare and relate these various map legends to each other and facilitate information sharing between federal agencies and other organizations. SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES COMPARED TO THE 1997 STANDARD The structure of the revised NVC hierarchy is a substantial revision of the 1997 hierarchy. The revised hierarchy addresses the following issues, among others: uses vegetation criteria to define all types, de-emphasizing abiotic criteria (e.g., eliminating direct use of hydrologic regimes in wetland formations, and using vegetation growth forms instead), provides a clear up-front distinction between natural and cultural vegetation wherever these can be observed from broad growth form patterns (rather than combining natural and cultural vegetation initially and separating them at lower levels), for natural vegetation, defines the upper levels based on broad growth form patterns that reflect ecological relationships (rather than detailed structural criteria, which are more appropriate lower down); provides a new set of middle-level natural units that bridge the large conceptual gap between alliance and formation, integrates the physiognomic and floristic hierarchy levels based on ecologic vegetation patterns, rather than developing the physiognomic and floristic levels independently and then forcing them into a hierarchy, provides detailed standards for plot data collection, type description and classification, data management and peer review of natural vegetation, and for cultural vegetation, provides an independent set of levels that addresses the particular needs of cultural vegetation. Examples of how the NVC can be linked to various land cover classification schemes are also provided. 10 Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America

3 OUTLINE OF CURRENT HIERARCHY Table 1. Major categories used to organize the hierarchy, and the set of Level 1 units proposed to replace the current Level 1 units. CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 2 Level 1 Formation Class VEGETATED AREAS (SEMI) NATURAL VEGETATION Forest and Woodland (Mesomorphic Tree ) Shrubland and Grassland (Mesomorphic Shrub and Herb ) Semi-Desert (Xeromorphic ) Polar and High Montane (Cryomorphic ) Aquatic (Hydromorphic ) CULTURAL VEGETATION Nonvascular and Sparse Vascular (Lithomorphic ) Agricultural Developed Not included in the NVC. Table 2. Revised hierarchy for natural vegetation with an example. Revised Hierarchy for Example Natural Upper Levels 1 Formation Class 2 Formation Subclass 3 - Formation Scientific Name: Mesomorphic Shrub and Herb Colloquial Name: Shrubland and Grassland Scientific Name: Temperate and Boreal Shrub and Herb Colloquial Name: Temperate and Boreal Shrubland and Grassland Scientific Name: Temperate Shrub and Herb Colloquial Name: Temperate Shrubland and Grassland Mid Levels 4 Division 5 Macrogroup 6 - Group Scientific Name: Andropogon Stipa Bouteloua Grassland and Shrubland Division Colloquial Name: North American Great Plains Grassland and Shrubland Scientific Name: Andropogon gerardii Schizachyrium scoparium Sorghastrum nutans Grassland and Shrubland Macrogroup Colloquial Name: Great Plains Tall Grassland and Shrubland Scientific Name: Andropogon gerardii Sporobolus heterolepis Grassland Group Colloquial Name: Great Plains Tallgrass Mesic Grassland Lower Levels 7 Alliance 8 Association Scientific Name: Andropogon gerardii (Clamagrostis Canadensis Panicum virgatum) Herbaceous Alliance Colloquial Name: Wet-mesic Tallgrass Prairie Scientific Name: Andropogon gerardii Panicum virgatum Helianthus grosseserratus Herbaceous Colloquial Name: Central Wet-mesic Tallgrass Prairie Announcements January

4 Announcements Table 3. Revised hierarchy for cultural vegetation with examples (from National Resources Inventory). Revised Hierarchy for Natural Example Example Upper Level 1 Cultural Class Agricultural Agricultural Level 2 Cultural Subclass Herbaceous Agricultural Woody Agricultural Level 3 Cultural Formation [NRI] Cultivated Crop Woody Horticultural Crop Level 4 Cultural Subformation Row Crop Orchard Mid Level 3 Cultural Group [optional] Temperate and Tropical Row Crop Temperate and Tropical Orchard Level 4 Cultural Subgroup (NRI) Corn Fruit-Orchards Lower Level 7 Cultural Type (NRI) Sweet Corn Apple Level 8 Cultural Subtype [optional] SUMMARY OF STANDARDS FOR DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF NATURAL VEGETATION Data sources Describe how to collect field plot data for vegetation classification purposes. Also provides guidelines for using literature and other data sources in addition to plot data. Classification and description Decribes how to prepare vegetation plot data or literature-based data, how to analyze and interpret the data, build a description of a type, including nomenclature. Peer review of proposed vegetation types 12 Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America

5 Describes how to submit a vegetation type for peer review to an FGDC-sponsored Peer Review team. Data management and dissemination Describes the databases, metadata standards, and web sites needed to maintain vegetation classification plot data and NVC type descriptions. SUMMARY OF STANDARDS FOR DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF CULTURAL VEGETATION At this time the critical components for describing and classifying cultural vegetation are not well developed. It is suggested that, for Agricultural, the National Resource Inventory classification be a starting point for the NVC standard, and that where desirable, the standards developed for natural vegetation can be applied. NEXT STEPS Based on comments received on this document (due 6 October), the FGDC vegetation subcommittee will revise the standards document and submit it for official approval to the FGDC Standards Working Group (SWG). The SWG is charged with conducting a public review of the proposed revised standard, and, provided comments and corrections are incorporated to the satisfaction of the SWG, would move to adopt the standard. At the same time, the FGDC vegetation subcommittee works with partners to solicit funds to maintain the standard, to develop an implementation standard, and to work with agencies to discuss how crosswalking to the standard can be accomplished. Appendix B. Relation of USNVC to Land Cover Classifications Table B.1. Comparison of FAO LCCS Land Cover Types (based on structural domains) and National Land Cover Database (NLCD) types with that of NVC Level 1 (see Di Gregorio and Jansen 1996, USGS 2001). Announcements January

6 Announcements VEGETATED 1 NATURAL CATEGORY LCCS A12. Natural and Semi- Natural Terrestrial LCCS Major Land Cover Type with Structural Domain Forest & Woodland Thicket & Shrubland Grasslands Sparse Lichens/Mosses NLCD (* indicates applies to Alaskan tundra only). Forest Shrubland Dwarf Shrub* Shrub/Scrub Grasslands/Herbaceous Grassland/Herbaceous Sedge Herbaceous* Non-Vascular Lichens* Moss* Wetlands Forested Wetland Scrub/Shrub Wetland Emergent Herb Wetland Aquatic Bed NVC Level 1 Forest & Woodland Shrubland & Grassland Semi-Desert Polar & High Montane Aquatic Nonvascular & Sparse Vascular CULTURAL WETLAND/ A24. Natural and Semi- Natural Aquatic or Regularly Flooded A11. Cultivated and Managed Terrestrial Areas Forest & Woodland Closed Shrubs & Open Shrubs Grasslands Sparse Lichens/Mosses Agriculture Tree Crops Shrub Crops Herbaceous Crops Developed Managed Lands - parks (woody) - parkland (scattered woody) - lawns (herb) Agriculture - Cultivated Crops (woody) - Cultivated Crops (herb) - Pasture/Hay Developed Developed, Open Space Agricultural - Woody Ag. Woody Horticultural Crops Other Woody Ag. - Herbaceous Ag. Cultivated Crop Pasture/Hay Other Herbaceous Ag Developed - Herbaceous and Woody Developed W E T L A N D / A23. Cultivated Aquatic or Regularly Flooded Areas - Aquatic Or Regularly Flooded Graminoid Crops - Aquatic Or Regularly Flooded Non-Graminoid Crops? NON- VEGETATED NATURAL B16. Bare Areas Consolidated Areas Unconsolidated Areas Barren Rock/Sand/Clay Unconsolidated Shore** FAO (informative) B28. Natural Waterbodies, Snow and Ice Natural Waterbodies Snow Ice Water Open Water Perennial Ice/Snow FAO (informative) CULTURAL B15. Artificial Surfaces and Associated Areas B27. Artificial Surfaces and Associated Areas Built-Up Areas (Developed) Non Built-Up Areas (Waste) Artificial Waterbodies Artificial Snow Artificial Ice Developed Low Intensity Medium Intensity High Intensity (FAO informative) Water Open Water Perennial Ice/Snow FAO (informative) 14 Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America