Phylogeny, trees and morphospace
|
|
- Maud Garrett
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 G562 Geometric Morphometrics Phylogeny, trees and morphospace Hierarchical patterns in morphometric data WALLABY HUMAN Node 0 LEOPARD Node 1 Node 3 FOSSA Node 2 DOG Node 4 OTTER Cottonwood tree (Populus deltoides), New Harmony, Indiana
2 G562 Geometric Morphometrics Most phenotypic data have a phylogenetic component Evolution - descent with modification (and diversification) Marmota) Consequence: organisms that share a common ancestor are expected to share similarities that are not shared with distantly related organisms. In such a situation, evolution introduces a hierarchical structure to morphometric data. Apodemus) Spermophilus) Thus: whenever three or more OTUs* are involved regardless of whether they are populations, stratigraphic samples, species, genera, families, or whatever their phylogenetic links introduce some degree of autocorrelation between the more closely related taxa. * OTU Operational Taxonomic Unit, shorthand for group in question
3 Approaches to hierarchy in morphometric data 1. Building trees from morphometric data to show hierarchical similarity (hierarchical clustering) 2. Finding groupings in morphometric data (non-hierarchical clustering) 3. Mapping morphometric data onto hierarchical structure derived from an independent source (e.g., phylogenetic tree) 4. Using phylogenetic statistical methods to account for (or remove) effects of hierarchy in statistical tests
4 Controversies about phylogenetic signal in morphometric data Some researchers, usually parsimony-based phylogeneticists, have argued that morphometric data do not have phylogenetic signal because they measure overall similarity Others have argued that morphometric data do not have phylogenetic signal because they are mostly adaptive And yet others argue that morphometric data do not have phylogenetic signal because they are mostly non-genetic And a few have argued that morphometric data do not have phylogenetic signal because they are merely morphological, not molecular...
5 Examples of evidence offered against phylogenetic signal 1. A UPGMA tree whose topology does not agree with the author s conception of phylogeny; 2. Correlation of morphometric data with a factor such as diet; 3. A two-dimensional PCA plot whose pattern of scatter does not appear to reflect phylogenetic relationships; 4. A parsimony tree based on gap-coded morphometric data that does not correspond to the author s conception of phylogeny; 5. A morphological tree that does not correspond to a molecular tree.
6 Under what conditions would morphometric data not have a phylogenetic component? 1. If the phenotypes are non-genetic, entirely environmentally plastic responses to local conditions met by an organism during its lifetime 2. If morphometric variation is non-existent 3. If morphometric variation is entirely due to measurement error 4. If species were specially created and have no evolutionary history 5. If phylogenetic history is completely erased by other factors, such as homoplasy due to parallel functional adaptations in different clades
7 The issues at stake: 1. Can phylogenetic relationships be reconstructed from morphometric data? 2. Do morphometric patterns reflect adaptation (e.g., diet) or phylogeny or something else? 3. Are observations based on morphometrics related to evolution or chance or environmental plasticity?
8 The scientific solution: 1. Measure the contribution of potential factors, don t assume that one factor is or is not important 2. Evaluate with hypothesis-driven tests for association between morphometric data and all relevant factors 3. Synthesize findings to describe the scope of each factor for explaining morphometric variation (i.e., under what conditions is the factor likely to be important and under what conditions is it not) How much of morphometric variation can be explained by phylogenetic history? Under what circumstances phylogenetic history be recovered from morphometric data? With what accuracy can phylogenetic history be recovered from morphometric data? When does phylogenetic history interfere with recovering other relationships?
9 Factor thinking in morphometrics Many factors, not just one, contribute to morphometric similarities and differences (variance). Phylogenetic History Functional Role Environmental Interactions The question is often not whether a factor does or does not contribute, but rather how much does it contribute. Morphometric Data MANOVA and regression are two methods for partitioning variance among factors. R 2 is one metric for measuring the association of a factor with the total variance. Measurement Error Sample Choice Unconsidered Factors
10 Empirical study of factors in morphometric variation Caumul, R and PD Polly Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, mandible, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia). Evolution, 59: Three phenotypic structures, each with different expectations for functional role, genetic vs. environmental contributions, and complexity, from the same populations and, thus, with the same phylogenetic history. 1. M. marmota 2. M. caudata caudata M. caudata aurea 4. M. baibacina M. himalayana robusta M. sibirica sibirica 0.01 Caumul and Polly, 2005
11 Path analysis (controlled multiple regression) Path coefficients (square to get R 2 ) Proportion unexplained (no need to square) Caumul and Polly, 2005
12 Proportion of morphometric variation explained by phylogeny and other factors Caumul and Polly, 2005
13 Trees recovered from morphometric data Real phylogeny Phylo signal=15%: Good recovery Phylo signal=7%: Poor recovery Phylo signal=5%: Good recovery Caumul and Polly, 2005
14 What do we actually know about phylogenetic signal in morphometrics? 1. Morphometric variation is largely, but not entirely heritable. Typical heritability studies put the value at 40%-70% heritable (percentage of variation that is passed from parent to offspring), high for traits that are measured by geneticists. 2. Morphometric traits evolve quickly. Compared to the gain and loss of structures (i.e., cladistic state changes of the ideal type), the size and shape of structures changes rapidly. (Something that ought to be obvious based on logic alone). 3. Size and shape of homologous structures are often constrained by common homologous functions. Once a structure has arisen, it often maintains a similar function throughout phylogenetic history (though there are notable exceptions). Thus the size and shape of that structure have functional constraints imposed on them. And morphometric comparisons are normally limited to structures that are found in all the OTUs being studied. 4. Traits have a window of time when they are likely to be phylogenetically informative. The window depends on the rate of evolution in the trait, the degree of functionality, and the degree of heritability. Within that window, phylogeny is likely to be recovered with a suitable methodology (e.g., Maximum-likelihood); outside that window, phylogeny is unlikely to be recovered.
15 Populations versus collections of populations Variation within populations is largely free of phylogenetic effects and so is an appropriate system for measuring relationship of shape to factors such as body size, latitude, etc. Variation between populations (or other OTUs) is normally influenced both by phylogenetic history and adaptive selection. The two may be difficult to disentangle (indeed, the two are themselves related). Among species in a appropriate system to measure disparity, adaptive similarity, etc.
16 Tree building: advantages 1. Trees summarize similarities and differences in shape across the whole shape (i.e., across all dimensions of morphospace) in a single, intuitive diagram 2. For biological data drawn from more than one species, the null assumption is that shape differences should be distributed in a tree-like hierarchy because of phylogeny 3. Morphometric trees can easily be compared to other trees (e.g., molecular phylogenies) using standard methods 4. Trees look impressive
17 Tree building: disadvantages 1. Your data might not have a natural hierarchical distribution 2. A tree necessarily distorts shape relations in order to force multivariate relationships into a single diagram 3. Trees forcefully represented complicated relationships and don t necessarily encourage thoughtful exploration of data 4. Assessing statistical support for trees based on morphometric shape is complicated and in its infancy 5. May attract unwanted criticism because of controversies about phylogeny and morphometrics
18 Tree terminology OTU (Operational Taxonomic Unit). This is a generic way of referring to whatever the things are on your tree (specimens, species means, handaxes, whatever). Tree. A branching diagram that connects OTUs by their similarity. Many criteria can be used for constructing a tree. In all cases, an assumption in building a tree is that object differences are structured such that they form a hierarchically nested pattern. Algorithm. The programming steps used to calculate the tree Cladistic parsimony. A method for constructing trees for purposes of phylogeny reconstruction that requires traits to be categorized into primitive and derived, hence an algorithm that cannot be applied to continuous quantitative data such as geometric shape. Quantitative or continuous data. Data that are measured and which can have a state equal to any real number. Geometric shape is an example of quantitative data. Meristic or discrete data. Data in which a trait can have only a specific state, often coded using integers. Often this is the presence or absence of things like digits. Phenetics. Tree building based on quantitative data. The term is normally used in a derogatory sense for comparison to cladistic parsimony because quantitative tree building methods do not formally divide variables into primitive and derived states.
19 Tree terminology (cont). Pairwise distance. Quantitative distance between two OTUs. In geometric morphometrics the pairwise distance is most logically the Procrustes distance, which is the same as a Euclidean distance. There are many kinds of distances that can be calculated, however. Patristic distance. The distance between two OTUs along the branches of the tree. This is usually different than the true pairwise distance because of compromises made in constructing the tree. Exact algorithm. A tree building algorithm that follows a single train of steps to calculate a tree. Optimizing algorithm. A tree building algorithm that finds the best tree using a certain criterion. A more-or-less exhaustive search is made through all possible trees to find the one that best fits the criterion. Statistical method. An optimizing algorithm that incorporates a probability model based on variances and statistical distributions. Maximum likelihood is such a method. Maximum likelihood. A general statistical method for estimating parameters like regression lines. In this discussion it refers to a specific statistically-based tree algorithm.
20 Types of trees Additive Additive. The length of branches on the tree correspond to change along the branch (i.e., to the shape distance between points on the tree). Neighbor-joining trees are an example of an additive tree. Ultrametric tree. A tree constructed so that the branch lengths all end at the same distance from the root of the tree. This is a plausible requirement because many OTUs are taxa and have evolved from a common ancestor, all to the present day. However, the true distance between OTUs may have to be distorted more to construct such a tree than with an additive tree. UPGMA trees are usually ultrametric. Unnamed type of tree. One whose branches simply show the clustering relations of the OTUs, but don t also show a patristic distance. Cladograms usually fall into this category. Ultrametric
21 Approaches to tree construction Distance matrix trees. For these trees, a pairwise distance matrix is first constructed. The algorithm fits the tree using those distances. A distance matrix is very closely related to a covariance matrix, but doesn t keep track of individual traits (which is important to diagnose what supports different branches). Both the cluster and neighbor-joining methods are distance methods. Trait based trees. A tree constructed from individual traits. Maximum likelihood is such a method. In theory, the value of each trait can be determined for each node. For geometric shape, this means that a shape can be constructed anywhere on the tree. Taxon&A& & Trait&1& Trait&2& Trait&3& Trait&4& Distance)(D 2 )) Taxon&B& & Trait&1& Trait&2& Trait&3& Trait&4& Distance&trees&combine&trait&values&in&single&distance& Taxon&A& & Trait&1& Trait&2& Trait&3& Trait&4& Taxon&B& & Trait&1& Trait&2& Trait&3& Trait&4& Likelihood&(or&Bayesian)&op9mizes&across&all&traits&individually&
22 Types of distance trees UPGMA: an ultrametric tree that can be calculated using any of the same distances, as well as with different joining methods. Neighbour joining: an additive tree that can be calculated using several distances. Squared Euclidean distance. For shape data, the Euclidean distance is equivalent to Procrustes distance and is recommended, specifically a squared Euclidean distance (which corresponds to theory of random evolution in quantitative traits) UPGMA in Mathematica << HierarchicalClustering` (* load Mathematica package *) tree = Agglomerate[scores[[1 ;;, 1 ;; 5]] -> labels, DistanceFunction -> SquaredEuclideanDistance, Linkage -> "Average"] (* Agglomerate[] function calculates tree, -> labels causes your list of labels to be inserted into the tree, distance function is option to select appropriate distance measure, linkage is option to specify the rules for building the tree. Average linkage and SquaredEuclideanDistance give a UPGMA tree. *) DendrogramPlot[tree, LeafLabels -> (# &), Orientation -> Bottom] WALLABY LEOPARD OTTER FOSSA DOG HUMAN
23 Trait-based trees: Maximum likelihood ML optimizes the tree statistically, keeping all the traits separate rather than combining them into a single distance. The ML algorithm finds the tree topology that maximizes the likelihood of the shape data in your sample having evolved given that tree and a Brownian motion model of evolution (i.e., no long-term directional selection and no strong stabilizing selection). The algorithm combines the probabilities associated with each OTU to find a branching pattern that connects them, presuming that the probability distribution of each is centered on its own value and that the variance of the distribution is a portion of the variance among all the OTUs.
24 Programs for building and processing trees: Phylogenetics for Mathematica package (reads trees, reconstructs ancestral states, simulates data on trees, independent contrasts, phylogenetic regression) Morphometrics for Mathematica package (trees into morphospace, reconstructs ancestral shape on trees, probabilities of ancestral shapes) PHYLIP (builds trees using several algorithms) Mesquite (lots of tree-based analyses and graphics)
25 Building an ML tree in PHYLIP PHYLIP is a phylogenetics package written by Joseph Felsenstein and is available at PHYLIP 1. Export scores in a comma delimited file with OTU names in first column. If you use the following code, the labels will be properly formatted (10 characters max) and the number of OTUs and traits will be added to the first line of the file: phyliplabels = MakePHYLIPLabels[labels]; phylipdata = Table[Prepend[scores[[x]], phyliplabels[[x]]], {x, Length[scores]}]; phylipdata=prepend[phylipdata,{length[phylipdata],length[phylipdata[[1]]-1}]; Export["/Users/Data files/mammalscores.csv", phylipdata, "CSV"] 2. Edit the file in a text editor where you should replace all commas with spaces 3. Save the file with the name infile in the PHYLIP folder. 4. Start CONTML module by double-clicking it. (Continuous Maximum likelihood). 5. Choose options: C for continuous traits, J jumble trees (add any odd number). 6. Click Y to start the program. 7. View results in outfile, which is a text file showing tree and statistics, and in treefile, which is a file that can be viewed and edited in TreeView. 8. Import the outfile back to Mathematica with the ReadNewick[] function and display the tree with the DrawNewickTree[] function (both from PollyPhylogenetics package)
26 Newick Trees Common text format for storing trees. Named after Newick s Lobster House in Dover, New Hampshire where Felsenstein, Rohlf, Maddison, Swofford and others had dinner as they discussed standards for phylogenetic software. Format: Branching pattern represented by parentheses, taxa separated by commas, tip names written as text, branch lengths follow with colon. (WALLABY:80,(HUMAN:65,((LEOPARD:35,FOSSA:35):20,(DOG:35,OTTER:35):20):10):15); WALLABY Node 0 HUMAN Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 LEOPARD FOSSA DOG OTTER
27 Phylogenetic correlations When doing statistics of shape data to other variables (e.g., regression or MANOVA), one must be careful of phylogenetic correlations when the data consist of different species or populations, some of which are more closely related and some of which are more distantly related. Phylogeny makes such data non-independent because similarity in shape and the other variable may be due to common ancestry rather than direct causal association. Use phylogenetic comparative statistics when you need to take phylogenetic correlations into account.
28 Phylogenetic comparative statistics Phylogenetic independent contrasts (PIC) A simple method for removing effects of shared history from data. Invented by Joe Felsenstein. Elaborated by Andy Purvis. PIC transforms the original data into new data (contrasts) from which the phylogenetic effects have been removed. Perform regression or other statistical analyses on the contrasts to determine the nonphylogenetic correlation between data and a factor. In Mathematica: IndependentContrasts[trait, tree] (from Phylogenetics package) Phylogenetic General Linear Models (PGLM) A more sophisticated method for assessing phylogenetic correlation and for mapping traits onto a tree. Developed by Martins and Hansen (1997). Can be used for the same purposes as PIC (e.g., regression), or can be used to reconstruct ancestral traits. In Mathematica: ReconstructNodes[tree, trait], PhylogeneticMatrices[tree] (Phylogenetics package), ReconstructAncestorShapes[proc, labels, tree], TreeToMorphospace[proc, labels, PCs, tree] (Morphometrics package) Squared Change Parsimony A cladist-friendly name for what is virtually the same things as the maximum-likelihood version of PGLM. Developed by Maddison (1991). Can be used to reconstruct ancestral traits or to calculate evolutionary changes of the trait on a tree. Phylogenetic Principal Components Analysis (ppca) A method that produces a principal components space based on a covariance matrix from which phylogenetic covariance has been removed, then projects scores into that space (without removing phylogenetic components of their variance). Developed by Revell (2009), discussed in detail by Polly et al. (2013). In Mathematica: PhylogeneticPrincipalComponentsOfShape[proc, labels, PCs, tree] (Morphometrics package)
29 Morphospace trees in Mathematica <<PollyMorphometrics` <<PollyPhylogenetics` tree = ReadNewick[ /path/filename.txt ] TreeToMorphospace[proc, labels, {1,2}, tree] Tips: 1. labels must be in same order as Procrustes objects 2. labels and tree tip names must be identical
30 Phylogenetic tree projected into morphospace Ancestral shape scores reconstructed using maximum likelihood (assuming Brownian motion process of evolution) Ancestors plotted in morphospace Tree branches drawn to connect ancestors and nodes 0.15 DOG 0.10 OTTER 0.05 Node 4 PC FOSSA Node 2 Node 3 Node 1 Node LEOPARD HUMAN WALLABY PC 1
31 Suggested Reading Caumul, R and PD Polly Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, mandible, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia). Evolution, 59: Felsenstein, J Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist 125: Klingenberg, CP and NA Gidaszewski Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Systematic Biology, 59: Maddison, W. P Squared-change parsimony reconstructions of ancestral states for continuousvalued characters on a phylogenetic tree. Systematic Zoology, 40: Martins, E. P. and T. F. Hansen Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. American Naturalist, 149: Revell, L. J Phylogenetic signal and linear regression on species data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1:
3D Data, Phylogenetics, and Trees In this lecture.
3D Data, Phylogenetics, and Trees In this lecture. 1. Analysis of 3D landmarks 2. Controversies about use of morphometrics in phylogene>cs 3. Empirical data on phylogene>c component of morphometric varia>on
More informationPhenotypic Evolution. and phylogenetic comparative methods. G562 Geometric Morphometrics. Department of Geological Sciences Indiana University
Phenotypic Evolution and phylogenetic comparative methods Phenotypic Evolution Change in the mean phenotype from generation to generation... Evolution = Mean(genetic variation * selection) + Mean(genetic
More informationThe practice of naming and classifying organisms is called taxonomy.
Chapter 18 Key Idea: Biologists use taxonomic systems to organize their knowledge of organisms. These systems attempt to provide consistent ways to name and categorize organisms. The practice of naming
More informationModularity for Mathematica User s Guide Version 2.0
Modularity 2.0 for Mathematica P. David Polly and Anjali Goswami, 2010 (updated April 2018) User s Guide Version 2.0 For use with: Goswami, A. & Polly, P. D. 2010 Methods for studying morphological integration,
More informationQuantitative evolution of morphology
Quantitative evolution of morphology Properties of Brownian motion evolution of a single quantitative trait Most likely outcome = starting value Variance of the outcomes = number of step * (rate parameter)
More informationDr. Amira A. AL-Hosary
Phylogenetic analysis Amira A. AL-Hosary PhD of infectious diseases Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Assiut University-Egypt Phylogenetic Basics: Biological
More informationAmira A. AL-Hosary PhD of infectious diseases Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Assiut
Amira A. AL-Hosary PhD of infectious diseases Department of Animal Medicine (Infectious Diseases) Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Assiut University-Egypt Phylogenetic analysis Phylogenetic Basics: Biological
More informationPOPULATION GENETICS Winter 2005 Lecture 17 Molecular phylogenetics
POPULATION GENETICS Winter 2005 Lecture 17 Molecular phylogenetics - in deriving a phylogeny our goal is simply to reconstruct the historical relationships between a group of taxa. - before we review the
More informationDiscrete & continuous characters: The threshold model
Discrete & continuous characters: The threshold model Discrete & continuous characters: the threshold model So far we have discussed continuous & discrete character models separately for estimating ancestral
More informationBINF6201/8201. Molecular phylogenetic methods
BINF60/80 Molecular phylogenetic methods 0-7-06 Phylogenetics Ø According to the evolutionary theory, all life forms on this planet are related to one another by descent. Ø Traditionally, phylogenetics
More informationAlgorithms in Bioinformatics
Algorithms in Bioinformatics Sami Khuri Department of Computer Science San José State University San José, California, USA khuri@cs.sjsu.edu www.cs.sjsu.edu/faculty/khuri Distance Methods Character Methods
More informationCLASSIFICATION AND EVOLUTION OF CAMINALCULES:
CLASSIFICATION AND EVOLUTION OF CAMINALCULES: One of the main goals of the lab is to illustrate the intimate connection between the classification of living species and their evolutionary relationships.
More informationPhylogenetic Trees. What They Are Why We Do It & How To Do It. Presented by Amy Harris Dr Brad Morantz
Phylogenetic Trees What They Are Why We Do It & How To Do It Presented by Amy Harris Dr Brad Morantz Overview What is a phylogenetic tree Why do we do it How do we do it Methods and programs Parallels
More informationTHEORY. Based on sequence Length According to the length of sequence being compared it is of following two types
Exp 11- THEORY Sequence Alignment is a process of aligning two sequences to achieve maximum levels of identity between them. This help to derive functional, structural and evolutionary relationships between
More informationPhylogenetic analyses. Kirsi Kostamo
Phylogenetic analyses Kirsi Kostamo The aim: To construct a visual representation (a tree) to describe the assumed evolution occurring between and among different groups (individuals, populations, species,
More informationA (short) introduction to phylogenetics
A (short) introduction to phylogenetics Thibaut Jombart, Marie-Pauline Beugin MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling Imperial College London Genetic data analysis with PR Statistics, Millport Field
More informationC3020 Molecular Evolution. Exercises #3: Phylogenetics
C3020 Molecular Evolution Exercises #3: Phylogenetics Consider the following sequences for five taxa 1-5 and the known outgroup O, which has the ancestral states (note that sequence 3 has changed from
More informationBioinformatics tools for phylogeny and visualization. Yanbin Yin
Bioinformatics tools for phylogeny and visualization Yanbin Yin 1 Homework assignment 5 1. Take the MAFFT alignment http://cys.bios.niu.edu/yyin/teach/pbb/purdue.cellwall.list.lignin.f a.aln as input and
More informationX X (2) X Pr(X = x θ) (3)
Notes for 848 lecture 6: A ML basis for compatibility and parsimony Notation θ Θ (1) Θ is the space of all possible trees (and model parameters) θ is a point in the parameter space = a particular tree
More informationPhylogeny: building the tree of life
Phylogeny: building the tree of life Dr. Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar Minhas Department of Computer and Information Sciences Pakistan Institute of Engineering & Applied Sciences PO Nilore, Islamabad, Pakistan
More informationESTIMATION OF CONSERVATISM OF CHARACTERS BY CONSTANCY WITHIN BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS
ESTIMATION OF CONSERVATISM OF CHARACTERS BY CONSTANCY WITHIN BIOLOGICAL POPULATIONS JAMES S. FARRIS Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Accepted March 30, 1966 The concept of conservatism
More informationConstructing Evolutionary/Phylogenetic Trees
Constructing Evolutionary/Phylogenetic Trees 2 broad categories: istance-based methods Ultrametric Additive: UPGMA Transformed istance Neighbor-Joining Character-based Maximum Parsimony Maximum Likelihood
More informationBiol 206/306 Advanced Biostatistics Lab 11 Models of Trait Evolution Fall 2016
Biol 206/306 Advanced Biostatistics Lab 11 Models of Trait Evolution Fall 2016 By Philip J. Bergmann 0. Laboratory Objectives 1. Explore how evolutionary trait modeling can reveal different information
More informationConstructing Evolutionary/Phylogenetic Trees
Constructing Evolutionary/Phylogenetic Trees 2 broad categories: Distance-based methods Ultrametric Additive: UPGMA Transformed Distance Neighbor-Joining Character-based Maximum Parsimony Maximum Likelihood
More informationZhongyi Xiao. Correlation. In probability theory and statistics, correlation indicates the
Character Correlation Zhongyi Xiao Correlation In probability theory and statistics, correlation indicates the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two random variables. In general statistical
More informationESS 345 Ichthyology. Systematic Ichthyology Part II Not in Book
ESS 345 Ichthyology Systematic Ichthyology Part II Not in Book Thought for today: Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else,
More informationWhat is Phylogenetics
What is Phylogenetics Phylogenetics is the area of research concerned with finding the genetic connections and relationships between species. The basic idea is to compare specific characters (features)
More information"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2009 University of California, Berkeley
"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2009 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler Jan. 22, 2009. Trees I. Summary of previous lecture: Hennigian
More informationOutline. Classification of Living Things
Outline Classification of Living Things Chapter 20 Mader: Biology 8th Ed. Taxonomy Binomial System Species Identification Classification Categories Phylogenetic Trees Tracing Phylogeny Cladistic Systematics
More informationBiology 211 (2) Week 1 KEY!
Biology 211 (2) Week 1 KEY Chapter 1 KEY FIGURES: 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7 VOCABULARY: Adaptation: a trait that increases the fitness Cells: a developed, system bound with a thin outer layer made of
More informationHomework Assignment, Evolutionary Systems Biology, Spring Homework Part I: Phylogenetics:
Homework Assignment, Evolutionary Systems Biology, Spring 2009. Homework Part I: Phylogenetics: Introduction. The objective of this assignment is to understand the basics of phylogenetic relationships
More informationPhylogenetic inference
Phylogenetic inference Bas E. Dutilh Systems Biology: Bioinformatic Data Analysis Utrecht University, March 7 th 016 After this lecture, you can discuss (dis-) advantages of different information types
More informationSome of these slides have been borrowed from Dr. Paul Lewis, Dr. Joe Felsenstein. Thanks!
Some of these slides have been borrowed from Dr. Paul Lewis, Dr. Joe Felsenstein. Thanks! Paul has many great tools for teaching phylogenetics at his web site: http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/people/plewis
More information"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2011 University of California, Berkeley
"PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS: ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION" Integrative Biology 200B Spring 2011 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler Feb. 1, 2011. Qualitative character evolution (cont.) - comparing
More informationUser s Manual for. Continuous. (copyright M. Pagel) Mark Pagel School of Animal and Microbial Sciences University of Reading Reading RG6 6AJ UK
User s Manual for Continuous (copyright M. Pagel) Mark Pagel School of Animal and Microbial Sciences University of Reading Reading RG6 6AJ UK email: m.pagel@rdg.ac.uk (www.ams.reading.ac.uk/zoology/pagel/)
More informationELE4120 Bioinformatics Tutorial 8
ELE4120 ioinformatics Tutorial 8 ontent lassifying Organisms Systematics and Speciation Taxonomy and phylogenetics Phenetics versus cladistics Phylogenetic trees iological classification Goal: To develop
More informationAnatomy of a tree. clade is group of organisms with a shared ancestor. a monophyletic group shares a single common ancestor = tapirs-rhinos-horses
Anatomy of a tree outgroup: an early branching relative of the interest groups sister taxa: taxa derived from the same recent ancestor polytomy: >2 taxa emerge from a node Anatomy of a tree clade is group
More informationCHAPTER 26 PHYLOGENY AND THE TREE OF LIFE Connecting Classification to Phylogeny
CHAPTER 26 PHYLOGENY AND THE TREE OF LIFE Connecting Classification to Phylogeny To trace phylogeny or the evolutionary history of life, biologists use evidence from paleontology, molecular data, comparative
More informationBiology 559R: Introduction to Phylogenetic Comparative Methods Topics for this week:
Biology 559R: Introduction to Phylogenetic Comparative Methods Topics for this week: Course general information About the course Course objectives Comparative methods: An overview R as language: uses and
More informationAppendix from L. J. Revell, On the Analysis of Evolutionary Change along Single Branches in a Phylogeny
008 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.doi: 10.1086/588078 Appendix from L. J. Revell, On the Analysis of Evolutionary Change along Single Branches in a Phylogeny (Am. Nat., vol. 17, no.
More informationPhylogenies & Classifying species (AKA Cladistics & Taxonomy) What are phylogenies & cladograms? How do we read them? How do we estimate them?
Phylogenies & Classifying species (AKA Cladistics & Taxonomy) What are phylogenies & cladograms? How do we read them? How do we estimate them? Carolus Linneaus:Systema Naturae (1735) Swedish botanist &
More informationHow should we organize the diversity of animal life?
How should we organize the diversity of animal life? The difference between Taxonomy Linneaus, and Cladistics Darwin What are phylogenies? How do we read them? How do we estimate them? Classification (Taxonomy)
More informationHow to read and make phylogenetic trees Zuzana Starostová
How to read and make phylogenetic trees Zuzana Starostová How to make phylogenetic trees? Workflow: obtain DNA sequence quality check sequence alignment calculating genetic distances phylogeny estimation
More informationC.DARWIN ( )
C.DARWIN (1809-1882) LAMARCK Each evolutionary lineage has evolved, transforming itself, from a ancestor appeared by spontaneous generation DARWIN All organisms are historically interconnected. Their relationships
More informationPhylogenetic Analysis
Phylogenetic Analysis Aristotle Through classification, one might discover the essence and purpose of species. Nelson & Platnick (1981) Systematics and Biogeography Carl Linnaeus Swedish botanist (1700s)
More informationPhylogenetic Analysis
Phylogenetic Analysis Aristotle Through classification, one might discover the essence and purpose of species. Nelson & Platnick (1981) Systematics and Biogeography Carl Linnaeus Swedish botanist (1700s)
More informationPhylogenetic Analysis
Phylogenetic Analysis Aristotle Through classification, one might discover the essence and purpose of species. Nelson & Platnick (1981) Systematics and Biogeography Carl Linnaeus Swedish botanist (1700s)
More informationIntegrative Biology 200 "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2018 University of California, Berkeley
Integrative Biology 200 "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2018 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler Feb. 14, 2018. Phylogenetic trees VI: Dating in the 21st century: clocks, & calibrations;
More informationBRIEF COMMUNICATIONS
Evolution, 59(12), 2005, pp. 2705 2710 BRIEF COMMUNICATIONS THE EFFECT OF INTRASPECIFIC SAMPLE SIZE ON TYPE I AND TYPE II ERROR RATES IN COMPARATIVE STUDIES LUKE J. HARMON 1 AND JONATHAN B. LOSOS Department
More informationSome of these slides have been borrowed from Dr. Paul Lewis, Dr. Joe Felsenstein. Thanks!
Some of these slides have been borrowed from Dr. Paul Lewis, Dr. Joe Felsenstein. Thanks! Paul has many great tools for teaching phylogenetics at his web site: http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/people/plewis
More informationPhylogeny and systematics. Why are these disciplines important in evolutionary biology and how are they related to each other?
Phylogeny and systematics Why are these disciplines important in evolutionary biology and how are they related to each other? Phylogeny and systematics Phylogeny: the evolutionary history of a species
More informationLecture V Phylogeny and Systematics Dr. Kopeny
Delivered 1/30 and 2/1 Lecture V Phylogeny and Systematics Dr. Kopeny Lecture V How to Determine Evolutionary Relationships: Concepts in Phylogeny and Systematics Textbook Reading: pp 425-433, 435-437
More information8/23/2014. Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Chapter 26 Objectives Explain the following characteristics of the Linnaean system of classification: a. binomial nomenclature b. hierarchical classification List the major
More informationBiology 1B Evolution Lecture 2 (February 26, 2010) Natural Selection, Phylogenies
1 Natural Selection (Darwin-Wallace): There are three conditions for natural selection: 1. Variation: Individuals within a population have different characteristics/traits (or phenotypes). 2. Inheritance:
More informationPhylogenetic Tree Reconstruction
I519 Introduction to Bioinformatics, 2011 Phylogenetic Tree Reconstruction Yuzhen Ye (yye@indiana.edu) School of Informatics & Computing, IUB Evolution theory Speciation Evolution of new organisms is driven
More informationContrasts for a within-species comparative method
Contrasts for a within-species comparative method Joseph Felsenstein, Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Box 357360, Seattle, Washington 98195-7360, USA email address: joe@genetics.washington.edu
More informationBiology 559R: Introduction to Phylogenetic Comparative Methods Topics for this week (Jan 27 & 29):
Biology 559R: Introduction to Phylogenetic Comparative Methods Topics for this week (Jan 27 & 29): Statistical estimation of models of sequence evolution Phylogenetic inference using maximum likelihood:
More informationSystematics - Bio 615
Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference 1. Introduction, history 2. Advantages over ML 3. Bayes Rule 4. The Priors 5. Marginal vs Joint estimation 6. MCMC Derek S. Sikes University of Alaska 7. Posteriors vs Bootstrap
More informationStatistical nonmolecular phylogenetics: can molecular phylogenies illuminate morphological evolution?
Statistical nonmolecular phylogenetics: can molecular phylogenies illuminate morphological evolution? 30 July 2011. Joe Felsenstein Workshop on Molecular Evolution, MBL, Woods Hole Statistical nonmolecular
More informationHominid Evolution What derived characteristics differentiate members of the Family Hominidae and how are they related?
Hominid Evolution What derived characteristics differentiate members of the Family Hominidae and how are they related? Introduction. The central idea of biological evolution is that all life on Earth shares
More informationStatistical Analysis. G562 Geometric Morphometrics PC 2 PC 2 PC 3 PC 2 PC 1. Department of Geological Sciences Indiana University
PC 2 PC 2 G562 Geometric Morphometrics Statistical Analysis PC 2 PC 1 PC 3 Basic components of GMM Procrustes Whenever shapes are analyzed together, they must be superimposed together This aligns shapes
More informationIntegrating Fossils into Phylogenies. Throughout the 20th century, the relationship between paleontology and evolutionary biology has been strained.
IB 200B Principals of Phylogenetic Systematics Spring 2011 Integrating Fossils into Phylogenies Throughout the 20th century, the relationship between paleontology and evolutionary biology has been strained.
More informationClassification, Phylogeny yand Evolutionary History
Classification, Phylogeny yand Evolutionary History The diversity of life is great. To communicate about it, there must be a scheme for organization. There are many species that would be difficult to organize
More informationTesting quantitative genetic hypotheses about the evolutionary rate matrix for continuous characters
Evolutionary Ecology Research, 2008, 10: 311 331 Testing quantitative genetic hypotheses about the evolutionary rate matrix for continuous characters Liam J. Revell 1 * and Luke J. Harmon 2 1 Department
More informationGEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS. Adrian Castellanos, Michelle Chrpa, & Pedro Afonso Leite
GEOMETRIC MORPHOMETRICS Adrian Castellanos, Michelle Chrpa, & Pedro Afonso Leite WHAT IS MORPHOMETRICS? Quantitative analysis of form, a concept that encompasses size and shape. Analyses performed on live
More informationPhylogene)cs. IMBB 2016 BecA- ILRI Hub, Nairobi May 9 20, Joyce Nzioki
Phylogene)cs IMBB 2016 BecA- ILRI Hub, Nairobi May 9 20, 2016 Joyce Nzioki Phylogenetics The study of evolutionary relatedness of organisms. Derived from two Greek words:» Phle/Phylon: Tribe/Race» Genetikos:
More informationPhylogeny 9/8/2014. Evolutionary Relationships. Data Supporting Phylogeny. Chapter 26
Phylogeny Chapter 26 Taxonomy Taxonomy: ordered division of organisms into categories based on a set of characteristics used to assess similarities and differences Carolus Linnaeus developed binomial nomenclature,
More informationUoN, CAS, DBSC BIOL102 lecture notes by: Dr. Mustafa A. Mansi. The Phylogenetic Systematics (Phylogeny and Systematics)
- Phylogeny? - Systematics? The Phylogenetic Systematics (Phylogeny and Systematics) - Phylogenetic systematics? Connection between phylogeny and classification. - Phylogenetic systematics informs the
More informationCompetitive Phylogenetics: A Laboratory Exercise
How to do it Competitive Phylogenetics: A Laboratory Exercise Declan J. Mc Cabe Abstrac t This exercise demonstrates the principle of parsimony in constructing cladograms. Although it is designed using
More informationPhylogeny: traditional and Bayesian approaches
Phylogeny: traditional and Bayesian approaches 5-Feb-2014 DEKM book Notes from Dr. B. John Holder and Lewis, Nature Reviews Genetics 4, 275-284, 2003 1 Phylogeny A graph depicting the ancestor-descendent
More informationPhylogenetic Trees. Phylogenetic Trees Five. Phylogeny: Inference Tool. Phylogeny Terminology. Picture of Last Quagga. Importance of Phylogeny 5.
Five Sami Khuri Department of Computer Science San José State University San José, California, USA sami.khuri@sjsu.edu v Distance Methods v Character Methods v Molecular Clock v UPGMA v Maximum Parsimony
More informationPhylogeny is the evolutionary history of a group of organisms. Based on the idea that organisms are related by evolution
Bio 1M: Phylogeny and the history of life 1 Phylogeny S25.1; Bioskill 11 (2ndEd S27.1; Bioskills 3) Bioskills are in the back of your book Phylogeny is the evolutionary history of a group of organisms
More informationAP Biology. Cladistics
Cladistics Kingdom Summary Review slide Review slide Classification Old 5 Kingdom system Eukaryote Monera, Protists, Plants, Fungi, Animals New 3 Domain system reflects a greater understanding of evolution
More informationHistorical Biogeography. Historical Biogeography. Systematics
Historical Biogeography I. Definitions II. Fossils: problems with fossil record why fossils are important III. Phylogeny IV. Phenetics VI. Phylogenetic Classification Disjunctions debunked: Examples VII.
More informationFig. 26.7a. Biodiversity. 1. Course Outline Outcomes Instructors Text Grading. 2. Course Syllabus. Fig. 26.7b Table
Fig. 26.7a Biodiversity 1. Course Outline Outcomes Instructors Text Grading 2. Course Syllabus Fig. 26.7b Table 26.2-1 1 Table 26.2-2 Outline: Systematics and the Phylogenetic Revolution I. Naming and
More informationEvolution of Body Size in Bears. How to Build and Use a Phylogeny
Evolution of Body Size in Bears How to Build and Use a Phylogeny Lesson II Using a Phylogeny Objectives for Lesson II: 1. Overview of concepts 1. Simple ancestral state reconstruction on the bear phylogeny
More informationWorkshop: Biosystematics
Workshop: Biosystematics by Julian Lee (revised by D. Krempels) Biosystematics (sometimes called simply "systematics") is that biological sub-discipline that is concerned with the theory and practice of
More informationEvolutionary Tree Analysis. Overview
CSI/BINF 5330 Evolutionary Tree Analysis Young-Rae Cho Associate Professor Department of Computer Science Baylor University Overview Backgrounds Distance-Based Evolutionary Tree Reconstruction Character-Based
More informationConsistency Index (CI)
Consistency Index (CI) minimum number of changes divided by the number required on the tree. CI=1 if there is no homoplasy negatively correlated with the number of species sampled Retention Index (RI)
More informationBootstrapping, Randomization, 2B-PLS
Bootstrapping, Randomization, 2B-PLS Statistics, Tests, and Bootstrapping Statistic a measure that summarizes some feature of a set of data (e.g., mean, standard deviation, skew, coefficient of variation,
More informationMacroevolution of Organismal Modularity and Integration. Gunther J. Eble Bioinformatik, Universität Leipzig
Macroevolution of Organismal Modularity and Integration Gunther J. Eble Bioinformatik, Universität Leipzig What is macroevolution? - evolution at and above the species level - large-scale phenotypic evolution
More informationChapter 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Chapter 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Biologists estimate that there are about 5 to 100 million species of organisms living on Earth today. Evidence from morphological, biochemical, and gene sequence
More informationAlgorithmic Methods Well-defined methodology Tree reconstruction those that are well-defined enough to be carried out by a computer. Felsenstein 2004,
Tracing the Evolution of Numerical Phylogenetics: History, Philosophy, and Significance Adam W. Ferguson Phylogenetic Systematics 26 January 2009 Inferring Phylogenies Historical endeavor Darwin- 1837
More informationReconstructing the history of lineages
Reconstructing the history of lineages Class outline Systematics Phylogenetic systematics Phylogenetic trees and maps Class outline Definitions Systematics Phylogenetic systematics/cladistics Systematics
More informationPhylogenetics. BIOL 7711 Computational Bioscience
Consortium for Comparative Genomics! University of Colorado School of Medicine Phylogenetics BIOL 7711 Computational Bioscience Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Computational Bioscience Program Consortium
More informationNon-independence in Statistical Tests for Discrete Cross-species Data
J. theor. Biol. (1997) 188, 507514 Non-independence in Statistical Tests for Discrete Cross-species Data ALAN GRAFEN* AND MARK RIDLEY * St. John s College, Oxford OX1 3JP, and the Department of Zoology,
More informationMultiple Sequence Alignment. Sequences
Multiple Sequence Alignment Sequences > YOR020c mstllksaksivplmdrvlvqrikaqaktasglylpe knveklnqaevvavgpgftdangnkvvpqvkvgdqvl ipqfggstiklgnddevilfrdaeilakiakd > crassa mattvrsvksliplldrvlvqrvkaeaktasgiflpe
More informationGENETICS - CLUTCH CH.22 EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS.
!! www.clutchprep.com CONCEPT: OVERVIEW OF EVOLUTION Evolution is a process through which variation in individuals makes it more likely for them to survive and reproduce There are principles to the theory
More informationPHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS
AP BIOLOGY EVOLUTION/HEREDITY UNIT Unit 1 Part 11 Chapter 26 Activity #15 NAME DATE PERIOD PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS PHYLOGENY Evolutionary history of species or group of related species SYSTEMATICS Study
More information--Therefore, congruence among all postulated homologies provides a test of any single character in question [the central epistemological advance].
Integrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2008 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler Jan. 29, 2008. The Hennig Principle: Homology, Synapomorphy, Rooting issues The fundamental
More informationIntroduction to characters and parsimony analysis
Introduction to characters and parsimony analysis Genetic Relationships Genetic relationships exist between individuals within populations These include ancestordescendent relationships and more indirect
More informationBioinformatics 1 -- lecture 9. Phylogenetic trees Distance-based tree building Parsimony
ioinformatics -- lecture 9 Phylogenetic trees istance-based tree building Parsimony (,(,(,))) rees can be represented in "parenthesis notation". Each set of parentheses represents a branch-point (bifurcation),
More information2 Dean C. Adams and Gavin J. P. Naylor the best three-dimensional ordination of the structure space is found through an eigen-decomposition (correspon
A Comparison of Methods for Assessing the Structural Similarity of Proteins Dean C. Adams and Gavin J. P. Naylor? Dept. Zoology and Genetics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, U.S.A. 1 Introduction
More informationIntegrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2008
Integrative Biology 200A "PRINCIPLES OF PHYLOGENETICS" Spring 2008 University of California, Berkeley B.D. Mishler March 18, 2008. Phylogenetic Trees I: Reconstruction; Models, Algorithms & Assumptions
More informationMolecular Evolution and DNA systematics
Biology 4505 - Biogeography & Systematics Dr. Carr Molecular Evolution and DNA systematics Ultimately, the source of all organismal variation that we have examined in this course is the genome, written
More informationUsing Trees for Classifications. Introduction
Using Trees for Classifications The Phylogenetic Cibele Caio Principles and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, Spring 2009 Introduction The impusle to characterize and classify species Ancient Aristoteles
More informationPhylogenetic relationship among S. castellii, S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata.
Supplementary Note S2 Phylogenetic relationship among S. castellii, S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata. Phylogenetic trees reconstructed by a variety of methods from either single-copy orthologous loci (Class
More informationTheory of Evolution Charles Darwin
Theory of Evolution Charles arwin 858-59: Origin of Species 5 year voyage of H.M.S. eagle (83-36) Populations have variations. Natural Selection & Survival of the fittest: nature selects best adapted varieties
More information(Stevens 1991) 1. morphological characters should be assumed to be quantitative unless demonstrated otherwise
Bot 421/521 PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS I. Origins A. Hennig 1950 (German edition) Phylogenetic Systematics 1966 B. Zimmerman (Germany, 1930 s) C. Wagner (Michigan, 1920-2000) II. Characters and character states
More information9/19/2012. Chapter 17 Organizing Life s Diversity. Early Systems of Classification
Section 1: The History of Classification Section 2: Modern Classification Section 3: Domains and Kingdoms Click on a lesson name to select. Early Systems of Classification Biologists use a system of classification
More information