Positively versus Negatively Frequency-Dependent Selection
|
|
- Maximillian Willis
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Positively versus Negatively Frequency-Dependent Selection Robert Morris and Tim Watson Faculty of Technology, De Montfort University, Leicester, United Kingdom, LE1 9BH Abstract. Frequency-dependent selection (FDS) refers to situations where individual fitnesses are dependent (to some degree) on where the individual s alleles lie in the proximate allele frequency distribution. If the dependence is negative that is, if alleles become increasingly detrimental to fitness as they become increasingly common at a given locus then genetic diversity may be maintained. If the dependence is positive, then alleles may converge at given loci. A hypothetical evolutionary model of FDS is here presented, in which the individuals themselves determined by means of a gene whether their fitnesses were positively or negatively frequency-dependent. The population ratio of the two types of individual was monitored in runs with different parameters, and explanations of what happened are offered. Key words: Frequency-dependent selection, multiple alleles, meta gene 1 Introduction Ridley s textbook Evolution [6] contains a good entry on FDS, the opening of which is reproduced here. Frequency-dependent selection occurs when the fitness of a genotype depends on its frequency. It is possible for the fitness of a genotype to increase (positively frequency-dependent) or decrease (negatively frequency-dependent) as the genotype frequency in the population increases. Many abstract models of FDS have been studied, with the principal aims being to strengthen the theory underpinning these phenomena, and to explore the surrounding space of possibilities. Curtsinger [3] looked at many different selection modes, and found a condition that determined whether or not the system would stably converge. Asmussen and Basnayake [1] studied several models, focussing on the potential for the maintenance of genetic diversity, and Roff [7] looked at maintaining both phenotypic and additive variation via FDS. Bürger [2] performed an extensive analysis of a general model (of which previous known models could be considered special cases) and gave a near-complete characterisation of the equilibrium structure. Schneider [8] carried out a similar study, with multiple alleles and loci, and found no equilibria possible with more than two alleles at a locus. And Trotter and Spencer [9] investigated the potential for maintaining polymorphism taking into account the presence of positive FDS.
2 2 Positively versus Negatively Frequency-Dependent Selection In every previous simulation of FDS, the selection regime has been imposed on the individuals by (essentially) the environment, in order to reproduce realworld conditions. In the present FDS model, the novel step is taken of putting the form of the frequency-dependence under the control of the individuals. In more precise terms, the individuals have a meta-gene in their genotype that dictates whether their fitness will be proportional to how similar they are to their neighbours, or how different they are to them. (Cf. the meta-genes in [4] and [5].) The purpose here is not to model any known natural phenomena, but to speculatively extend the domain of theoretical FDS in an interesting what if? way. 2 Experiments and Analysis A standard genetic algorithm was written whose genotype consisted of one meta gene plus a chromosome. The meta gene was a bit, and the chromosome consisted of non-negative integers in a given range. A zero allele in the meta gene told the fitness function to reward that individual for similarity, and a one told the function to reward it for difference. The measures were based on the concept of Hamming distance, and were implemented here in two different ways: pairwise, and population-wide. In the pairwise method, an individual s fitness was calculated by comparing it to a randomly chosen individual from the population (which could have been itself). If the individual in question had a meta gene of zero, its fitness was given by 1 plus the total number of genes 1 by locus which it had in common with the other individual, ignoring the meta genes. If the meta gene was a one, the fitness was given by 1 plus the total number of genes which they did not have in common. For example, for the individuals < > and < >, the fitness of the first w.r.t. the second would be 4 (= 1 + 3), whereas the fitness of the second w.r.t. the first would be 3. In the population-wide method, an individual s fitness was calculated by comparing it to every individual in the population (including itself). This was performed by applying the pairwise method down the whole population, and tallying up the points. These were the only components of the fitnesses. Six runs were executed for every combination of the following parameter ranges: population size = 10 and 100; chromosome length = 1, 4, and 40; allele range = 2 (i.e. bitstrings), 3, and 4; fitness calculation = pairwise and population wide; mutation rate = zero, low, and high ; crossover = off and on ( 70% across each new population). The chromosomes were initialised randomly, but the metabits were set alternately to 0 and 1, to prevent biased starts. The main datum that was tracked during every run was the ratio of the two types of individual in the population per generation this is what the vertical axes represent in most of the figures. A value of 1 indicates that the population is dominated by individuals whose fitness is negatively frequency-dependent (hereafter NFDs ); a value of 0 1 The minimal possible fitness was 1 so no individual could have a zero probability of being selected.
3 Positively versus Negatively Frequency-Dependent Selection 3 indicates domination by individuals with positively frequency-dependent fitness (PFDs); a value of 0.5 indicates a 50:50 mixture. 2.1 Two Alleles When the bitstring results were plotted and compared, it was seen that neither the presence of crossover nor the choice of fitness function (pairwise or population wide) made much difference. The mutation rate was not particularly important either, so long as it was neither vanishingly small nor excessively high. And the population size and the chromosome length only changed the destiny of the system when they were very small. Figure 1 shows what usually happened in the experiments for all but the extreme settings. The PFDs made more copies of themselves than the NFDs from the outset, and the population soon became dominated by PFDs. The system entered an evolutionarily stable state, which mutation and crossover could not overturn. Fig. 1. How the ratio of binary PFDs (meta gene = 0) to NFDs (meta gene = 1) varied over the first 200 generations of two sets of six runs. Plot (a) shows a noisy case, and plot (b) shows a more representative case. Why the PFDs always defeated the NFDs in base-2 (in non-extreme conditions) can be understood in the following terms. If two bitstrings are generated completely at random, the Hamming distance between them will lie somewhere between zero and their length, according to a bell-shaped probability distribution with a peak at half their length. In other words, they will probably have half their bits in common. This means that in a random initial population of 50% PFDs and 50% NFDs, the mixture of fitnesses found in the PFD group will probably be the same as that of the NFD group. In the first few generations therefore, selection will effectively be random. This means that different individuals will make varying numbers of copies of themselves, so after the first few generations, the population will comprise a number of (near-)homogenous groups of PFDs, a number of (near-)homogenous groups of NFDs, and a mixture of unique individuals of both type. (Crossover is temporally being ignored here, but when it is factored in it does not change the result.) In the pairwise fitness method, a member of a group will be compared to one of three other kinds of individual: a fellow group member, a member of another group, or one of the singletons. A PFD will get maximum points from a fellow group member, and (essentially) random points from the others. A NFD, on the other hand, will
4 4 Positively versus Negatively Frequency-Dependent Selection get minimum points from a fellow group member, and random points from the others. This means that as the population evolves, the PFDs get progressively fitter and the NFDs get progressively less fit, and at the same time, PFD groups that are similar to each other will grow faster than PFD groups that are more genetically isolated. The inevitable outcome is that the NFDs all die out as the population drives towards uniformity. The same occurs with the population-wide fitness method, because the same fitness mixture is there. A converged PFD-only population cannot be invaded by an NFD mutant, because such a mutant would have a minimal (or near minimal) fitness compared to the maximal (or near maximal) fitnesses of the PFDs. A diverse PFD-only population is resistant to NFD mutants by an amount that negatively correlates to its diversity: if it is approaching convergence, it will have a high resistance, but if it is very mixed, then an NFD mutant could arise with a fitness comparable to those of the PFDs. However, if an NFD mutant does manage to get into a mixed population and starts spreading, the mutant group will die down, for the same reason as their kind dies out from the start. 2.2 Three Alleles When the base-3 results were plotted, it was seen that the mutation rate and fitness function were similarly (ir)relevant as for base 2, but that the chromosome length and the population size were important, as was crossover in certain circumstances. One of the most important differences between the two-allele and the three-allele systems was how they behaved initially, from a random start. Whereas with two alleles, the population generally converged quickly to zeroes at the meta-locus (i.e. the PFDs dominated), with three alleles the population generally did the opposite, and converged to ones at the meta-locus. This was because in every initial population, any two individuals could expect to have on average only 1 3 of their genes in common (as opposed to the bitstring case, where it was 1 2 ). The NFDs could thus expect fitnesses of 2 3 of the maximum, while the PFDs could only expect 1 3 of the maximum. Consequently, the NFDs made around twice as many copies of themselves during the first few generations, so quickly wiped out the PFDs. Hence in every run (excepting some with extreme parameters) the populations took themselves into a negativelyfrequency-dependent selection regime. (This is also what happens for all larger allele alphabets, so the two-allele situation is exceptional in this regard.) These NFD convergences did not always last: they often turned out to be merely the first of two phases. When the population was large, and particularly when the chromosome was short as well, the NFD domination seemed very stable. Figure 2 shows two examples of this stability, as well as the fast convergences mentioned previously. No PFDs could invade during the timescales of the experiments, some of which went as far as 5000 generations, so these situations were the complements in terms of the PFD:NFD ratio of the two-allele situations (though they were not complementary in terms of diversity, because NFD populations stay diverse while PFD populations converge).
5 Positively versus Negatively Frequency-Dependent Selection 5 Fig. 2. How the ratio of PFDs to NFDs varied during the first and last 100 generations of two sets of six 2000-generation runs. The NFDs dominate in both cases, partly because the chromosomes were short and the populations large. Two examples of the second phase are plotted in figure 3. In (a), which is representative of most small-population cases, the NFDs died out nearly as quickly as they took over, whereas in (b) where the populations were large it took varying lengths of time for the PFDs to successfully invade, with the longest being around 300 generations. As stated earlier, PFD-domination states, where the genotypes are converged or converging, are global attractors in this kind of system, and a return to NFD domination may only occur via a vastly improbable mutation and/or selection sequence. Fig. 3. How the ratio of PFDs to NFDs varied over the first 200 and 400 generations of two sets of six runs. The PFDs eventually dominate in both cases. 2.3 Multiple Alleles The sets of results gathered for base-4 chromosomes were almost the same as their counterparts in base-3, and preliminary runs in even higher bases indicated that the patterns continue. Explanations of why certain multi-allele populations can support long-term NFD domination, but others cannot, are now offered. It was found that the configurations most conducive to stable NFD-domination were those of very large populations and allele alphabets, but very short chromosomes, ideally single-locus. Reducing the population size, reducing the number of alleles, and increasing the chromosome length all tended to reduce the length of time the NFDs could survive before before displaced by PFDs. This result can be explained with an example. In a population of 200 NFD-individuals with base-5 single-gene chromosomes (i.e. the genotype comprises 2 genes: the meta gene [0..1] + the chromosomal gene [0..4]) where there are 40 of each allele, every
6 6 Positively versus Negatively Frequency-Dependent Selection individual s fitness as measured by the inclusive population-wide method is 161. If an individual experienced a mutation in its meta gene, its fitness would be 41: with only 1 4 the fitness of its neighbours, it would struggle to survive. And if it did survive and spread a little, its group would continue to struggle, because no matter how many copies it made, as long as there were at least two other alleles in the population, those others would be fitter. The experimental reality would be that the mutant would disappear in a generation or two s time, as would any copies it managed to make. An observer would have to wait a long time to see a PFD takeover. Now, if the allele range is increased, the expected fitness of a PFD mutant decreases, and if the population size is increased, the amount of work it must do to dominate the population increases with it. This is why those settings have the effect they do. Regarding the chromosome length, the effect of increasing it is perhaps counter-intuitive; one might have thought that longer chromosomes would have more capacity to be different from each other, thereby making NFDdomination stabler and longer lasting. Not only is this not the case, it is the opposite of the case, for the following reason. In a well-spaced-out population, at each locus there should be approximately equal ratios of the alleles across the population (so for example, in a population of 100 base-4 individuals, 25 individuals should have a 0 as their first gene, 25 should have a 1, etc.). When the chromosome is short, the low capacity for difference means that every gene is important, so every gene has healthy selective pressure on it. But when the chromosome is long, a given gene is less important, as it represents only a very small portion of the distance between individuals, so the selective pressure applied on it is relatively light. Consequently, whereas for short chromosomes the local allele ratios are kept under quite tight control, for long chromosomes they can drift and become skewed. This tends to reduce the genetic distance between individuals, making it easier (to some degree) for PFD mutants to establish themselves in the population. 2.4 Crossover The last parameter to be discussed is crossover. This operator did not discernably change the results in most of the runs, but when the populations and chromosomes were (relatively) large and the number of alleles greater than two, it made a difference. The disappearance of NFDs shown in figure 3(b) did not happen in that same time period in different runs when the only difference in settings was the absence of crossover. This may seem strange at first, when it is considered that crossover does not change population-wide gene frequencies at any loci, and that it is those frequencies that control the fitnesses. Something subtle was happening. In a mutation-only system (with a big population, long chromosomes, and multiple alleles) where NFDs are dominant, the population is usually made up of several roughly-equally-fit groups, within each of which there is homogeneity or near homogeneity. If a group happens to expand, its members fitnesses dip, and the fitnesses of the non-members rise, so the group
7 Positively versus Negatively Frequency-Dependent Selection 7 usually shrinks back down. (This is a standard dynamic that one finds in populations subject to negatively FDS.) The crucial observation is that when a group expands, causing certain alleles become undesirably frequent at several loci, the undesirable genes are carried by identifiable individuals. Evolution can therefore remove these genes by selecting against the individuals that carry them. When crossover of any type is added, it breaks up the group structure of the population, but this in itself does not have too much impact on the system s behaviour. Crossing over can be described as dispersing or mixing up the alleles at each locus across the population. Thus, if any individuals now make extra copies of themselves, the alleles they add to the population are dispersed up and down the loci, so there are no identifiably-bad individuals that can be selected against. In other words, instead of selection having guilty individuals it can remove, the guilt is spread across the population, so there are no longer any outstandingly guilty individuals. Fig. 4. The mean fitnesses over the first 300 generations of three sets of six runs. To see the exact effect crossover had, the mean fitnesses were plotted for the relevant base-3 runs. Figure 4 shows how they varied for 0%, 10%, and 70% uniform crossover, where the other parameters were the same as those of plot (b) in figure 3. Figure 4(a) shows a case where the groups scenario was played out. The fitnesses quickly rose to around 2 3 of the maximum which was to be expected with three alleles and stayed there. The variability of the values reflects the group-sizes changing as well as the drifting of groups themselves. Plot (c) which represents the exact same runs as those in figure 3(b) differs in two keys way to (a). Firstly, there is a gradual drop after the initial rise, and secondly, the curves take off at those times that correspond to the PFD-mutant invasions, as PFD populations are fitter than NFD ones. Plot (b) shows that a very small amount of crossover changes the system s behaviour. It is roughly the same as (c), with the key differences being higher resistances to PFD invasions, and the shorter durations of those invasions when they occur. The former can be attributed to less dispersion of unwanted alleles; the latter shows that crossover slows down invasions, because the dispersals make the PFDs less similar to each other. Further runs with more alleles and other population sizes suggested that crossover causes the mean fitness to decay geometrically from its high early value to a stable value somewhere above the halfway value. (Also, the dip depth increased with the number of alleles, so the dips in figure 4 are the least severe examples of their kind.) It appears that it is in those resultant regions of stable
8 8 Positively versus Negatively Frequency-Dependent Selection fitness that selection can positively promote the rarer alleles as effectively as crossover can assist the commoner ones. 3 Conclusion This paper has sought to present and explain a novel hypothetical model of frequency-dependent selection in which the individuals determine for themselves whether the frequency dependence of their fitness is positive or negative. It was found that in this particular artificial evolutionary system, the important parameters are the population size, the chromosome length, the allele range, and the presence or not of crossover. When there are only two alleles (the binary case) a random initial population will become stably dominated by individuals whose fitness is positively frequency-dependent. When there are more than two alleles, the population will become dominated by individuals whose fitness is negatively frequencydependent. These converged states vary in their stability, with their durations depending on the parameters. When they end, they end with the imposition of stable positively-fds across the population, a state whose arrival can be hastened by making any of the following parameter changes: reducing the population size, increasing the chromosome length, and enabling crossover. References 1. Asmussen, M. A., Basnayake, E.: Frequency-Dependent Selection: The High Potential for Permanent Genetic Variation in the Diallelic, Pairwise Interaction Model. Genetics. 125, (1990) 2. Bürger, R.: A Multilocus Analysis of Intraspecific Competition and Stabilizing Selection on a Quantitative Trait. Journal of Math. Biology. 50, (2005) 3. Curtsinger, J. W.: Evolutionary Principles for Polynomial Models of Frequency- Dependent Selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81, (1984) 4. Grefenstette, J. J.: Evolvability in Dynamic Fitness Landscapes: A Genetic Algorithm Approach. Proc. of the 1999 Conf. on Ev. Comp (1999) 5. Hillman, J. P. A., Hinde, C. J.: Evolving UAV Tactics with an Infected Genome. Proc. of the 5th UK Workshop on Comp. Intel (2005) 6. Ridley, M., 7. Roff, D. A.: The Maintenance of Phenotypic and Genetic Variation in Threshold Traits by Frequency-Dependent Selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 11, (1998) 8. Schneider, K. A.: A Multilocus-Multiallele Analysis of Frequency- Dependent Selection Induced by Intraspecific Competition. Journal of Math. Biology. 52, (2006) 9. Trotter, M. V., Spencer, H. G.: Frequency-Dependent Selection and the Maintenance of Genetic Variation: Exploring the Parameter Space of the Multiallelic Pairwise Interaction Model. Genetics. 176, (2007)
Chapter 8: Introduction to Evolutionary Computation
Computational Intelligence: Second Edition Contents Some Theories about Evolution Evolution is an optimization process: the aim is to improve the ability of an organism to survive in dynamically changing
More informationThe Evolution of Sex Chromosomes through the. Baldwin Effect
The Evolution of Sex Chromosomes through the Baldwin Effect Larry Bull Computer Science Research Centre Department of Computer Science & Creative Technologies University of the West of England, Bristol
More informationThe Evolution of Gene Dominance through the. Baldwin Effect
The Evolution of Gene Dominance through the Baldwin Effect Larry Bull Computer Science Research Centre Department of Computer Science & Creative Technologies University of the West of England, Bristol
More informationGenetical theory of natural selection
Reminders Genetical theory of natural selection Chapter 12 Natural selection evolution Natural selection evolution by natural selection Natural selection can have no effect unless phenotypes differ in
More informationMajor questions of evolutionary genetics. Experimental tools of evolutionary genetics. Theoretical population genetics.
Evolutionary Genetics (for Encyclopedia of Biodiversity) Sergey Gavrilets Departments of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-6 USA Evolutionary
More informationThe concept of adaptive phenotypic polymorphism in evolutionary theory
The concept of adaptive phenotypic polymorphism in evolutionary theory Olof Leimar, Stockholm University Polymorphic outcomes in evolutionary games A. Conditional strategy - genetic monomorphism B. Mixed
More informationMATHEMATICAL MODELS - Vol. III - Mathematical Modeling and the Human Genome - Hilary S. Booth MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND THE HUMAN GENOME
MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND THE HUMAN GENOME Hilary S. Booth Australian National University, Australia Keywords: Human genome, DNA, bioinformatics, sequence analysis, evolution. Contents 1. Introduction:
More informationOther Organisms (Part 3)
Name: Hour: Teacher: ROZEMA Biology Evolution Unit Addie Bacteria Other Organisms (Part 3) Let s Review What We Know So Far: Natural Selection is There are differences between the Junco birds that live
More informationDARWIN: WHICH MATHEMATICS?
200 ANNI DI DARWIN Facoltà di Scienze Matemtiche Fisiche e Naturali Università del Salento 12 Febbraio 2009 DARWIN: WHICH MATHEMATICS? Deborah Lacitignola Department of Mathematics University of Salento,,
More informationEVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF MULTIPLAYER COOPERATION IN A SUBDIVIDED POPULATION
Friday, July 27th, 11:00 EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS AND THE EVOLUTION OF MULTIPLAYER COOPERATION IN A SUBDIVIDED POPULATION Karan Pattni karanp@liverpool.ac.uk University of Liverpool Joint work with Prof.
More informationChapter 13 Meiosis and Sexual Reproduction
Biology 110 Sec. 11 J. Greg Doheny Chapter 13 Meiosis and Sexual Reproduction Quiz Questions: 1. What word do you use to describe a chromosome or gene allele that we inherit from our Mother? From our Father?
More informationHaploid & diploid recombination and their evolutionary impact
Haploid & diploid recombination and their evolutionary impact W. Garrett Mitchener College of Charleston Mathematics Department MitchenerG@cofc.edu http://mitchenerg.people.cofc.edu Introduction The basis
More informationAre there species smaller than 1mm?
Are there species smaller than 1mm? Alan McKane Theoretical Physics Division, University of Manchester Warwick, September 9, 2013 Alan McKane (Manchester) Are there species smaller than 1mm? Warwick, September
More informationDarwinian Selection. Chapter 6 Natural Selection Basics 3/25/13. v evolution vs. natural selection? v evolution. v natural selection
Chapter 6 Natural Selection Basics Natural Selection Haploid Diploid, Sexual Results for a Diallelic Locus Fisher s Fundamental Theorem Darwinian Selection v evolution vs. natural selection? v evolution
More informationPopulation Structure
Ch 4: Population Subdivision Population Structure v most natural populations exist across a landscape (or seascape) that is more or less divided into areas of suitable habitat v to the extent that populations
More informationLecture 9 Evolutionary Computation: Genetic algorithms
Lecture 9 Evolutionary Computation: Genetic algorithms Introduction, or can evolution be intelligent? Simulation of natural evolution Genetic algorithms Case study: maintenance scheduling with genetic
More informationProblems for 3505 (2011)
Problems for 505 (2011) 1. In the simplex of genotype distributions x + y + z = 1, for two alleles, the Hardy- Weinberg distributions x = p 2, y = 2pq, z = q 2 (p + q = 1) are characterized by y 2 = 4xz.
More informationLecture 24: Multivariate Response: Changes in G. Bruce Walsh lecture notes Synbreed course version 10 July 2013
Lecture 24: Multivariate Response: Changes in G Bruce Walsh lecture notes Synbreed course version 10 July 2013 1 Overview Changes in G from disequilibrium (generalized Bulmer Equation) Fragility of covariances
More informationCoalescing Cellular Automata
Coalescing Cellular Automata Jean-Baptiste Rouquier 1 and Michel Morvan 1,2 1 ENS Lyon, LIP, 46 allée d Italie, 69364 Lyon, France 2 EHESS and Santa Fe Institute {jean-baptiste.rouquier, michel.morvan}@ens-lyon.fr
More informationNOTES Ch 17: Genes and. Variation
NOTES Ch 17: Genes and Vocabulary Fitness Genetic Drift Punctuated Equilibrium Gene flow Adaptive radiation Divergent evolution Convergent evolution Gradualism Variation 17.1 Genes & Variation Darwin developed
More informationThe concept of the adaptive landscape
1 The concept of the adaptive landscape The idea of a fitness landscape was introduced by Sewall Wright (1932) and it has become a standard imagination prosthesis for evolutionary theorists. It has proven
More informationIntroduction to Digital Evolution Handout Answers
Introduction to Digital Evolution Handout Answers Note to teacher: The questions in this handout and the suggested answers (in red, below) are meant to guide discussion, not be an assessment. It is recommended
More informationClassical Selection, Balancing Selection, and Neutral Mutations
Classical Selection, Balancing Selection, and Neutral Mutations Classical Selection Perspective of the Fate of Mutations All mutations are EITHER beneficial or deleterious o Beneficial mutations are selected
More informationEVOLUTION change in populations over time
EVOLUTION change in populations over time HISTORY ideas that shaped the current theory James Hutton (1785) proposes that Earth is shaped by geological forces that took place over extremely long periods
More informationThe Mechanisms of Evolution
The Mechanisms of Evolution Figure.1 Darwin and the Voyage of the Beagle (Part 1) 2/8/2006 Dr. Michod Intro Biology 182 (PP 3) 4 The Mechanisms of Evolution Charles Darwin s Theory of Evolution Genetic
More informationEVOLUTION. HISTORY: Ideas that shaped the current evolutionary theory. Evolution change in populations over time.
EVOLUTION HISTORY: Ideas that shaped the current evolutionary theory. Evolution change in populations over time. James Hutton & Charles Lyell proposes that Earth is shaped by geological forces that took
More informationComputational statistics
Computational statistics Combinatorial optimization Thierry Denœux February 2017 Thierry Denœux Computational statistics February 2017 1 / 37 Combinatorial optimization Assume we seek the maximum of f
More informationBIOL Evolution. Lecture 9
BIOL 432 - Evolution Lecture 9 J Krause et al. Nature 000, 1-4 (2010) doi:10.1038/nature08976 Selection http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a38k mj0amhc&feature=playlist&p=61e033 F110013706&index=0&playnext=1
More informationEVOLUTION change in populations over time
EVOLUTION change in populations over time HISTORY ideas that shaped the current theory James Hutton & Charles Lyell proposes that Earth is shaped by geological forces that took place over extremely long
More informationCHAPTER 23 THE EVOLUTIONS OF POPULATIONS. Section C: Genetic Variation, the Substrate for Natural Selection
CHAPTER 23 THE EVOLUTIONS OF POPULATIONS Section C: Genetic Variation, the Substrate for Natural Selection 1. Genetic variation occurs within and between populations 2. Mutation and sexual recombination
More informationBIO S380T Page 1 Summer 2005: Exam 2
BIO S380T Page 1 Part I: Definitions. [5 points for each term] For each term, provide a brief definition that also indicates why the term is important in ecology or evolutionary biology. Where I ve provided
More informationA simple genetic model with non-equilibrium dynamics
J. Math. Biol. (1998) 36: 550 556 A simple genetic model with non-equilibrium dynamics Michael Doebeli, Gerdien de Jong Zoology Institute, University of Basel, Rheinsprung 9, CH-4051 Basel, Switzerland
More informationAnalysis of the 500 mb height fields and waves: testing Rossby wave theory
Analysis of the 500 mb height fields and waves: testing Rossby wave theory Jeffrey D. Duda, Suzanne Morris, Michelle Werness, and Benjamin H. McNeill Department of Geologic and Atmospheric Sciences, Iowa
More informationHow to Use This Presentation
How to Use This Presentation To View the presentation as a slideshow with effects select View on the menu bar and click on Slide Show. To advance through the presentation, click the right-arrow key or
More informationChapter 5. Evolution of Biodiversity
Chapter 5. Evolution of Biodiversity I. Earth s tremendous diversity A. life comes in many forms B. Recall 1. we can think of biodiversity in three ways a) genetic diversity b) species diversity c) ecosystem
More informationExperimental Evolution in Avida-ED Michigan State University NSF Beacon Center for the Study of Evolution in Action
Experimental Evolution in Avida-ED Michigan State University NSF Beacon Center for the Study of Evolution in Action YouTube tutorial: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjwtg0so4ba&feature=youtu.be Launch
More informationThe phenotype of this worm is wild type. When both genes are mutant: The phenotype of this worm is double mutant Dpy and Unc phenotype.
Series 2: Cross Diagrams - Complementation There are two alleles for each trait in a diploid organism In C. elegans gene symbols are ALWAYS italicized. To represent two different genes on the same chromosome:
More informationModule BIO- M1- S06 Evolu-onary ecology. Adaptive dynamics. David Claessen Ins-tut de Biologie de l ENS Equipe Eco- Evolu-on Mathéma-que
Module BIO- M1- S06 Evolu-onary ecology Adaptive dynamics David Claessen Ins-tut de Biologie de l ENS Equipe Eco- Evolu-on Mathéma-que OBJECTIF Une théorie quantitative pour prédire la tendence evolutive
More informationEvolutionary Theory. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers Sunderland, Massachusetts U.S.A.
Evolutionary Theory Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations Sean H. Rice Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers Sunderland, Massachusetts U.S.A. Contents Preface ix Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 Selection on One
More informationLinking levels of selection with genetic modifiers
Linking levels of selection with genetic modifiers Sally Otto Department of Zoology & Biodiversity Research Centre University of British Columbia @sarperotto @sse_evolution @sse.evolution Sally Otto Department
More informationEVOLUTION. Evolution - changes in allele frequency in populations over generations.
EVOLUTION Evolution - changes in allele frequency in populations over generations. Sources of genetic variation: genetic recombination by sexual reproduction (produces new combinations of genes) mutation
More informationEvolutionary Dynamics and Extensive Form Games by Ross Cressman. Reviewed by William H. Sandholm *
Evolutionary Dynamics and Extensive Form Games by Ross Cressman Reviewed by William H. Sandholm * Noncooperative game theory is one of a handful of fundamental frameworks used for economic modeling. It
More informationName: Period Study Guide 17-1 and 17-2
Name: Period Study Guide 17-1 and 17-2 17-1 The Fossil Record (pgs. 417-422) 1. What is the fossil record? 2. What evidence does the fossil record provide? 1. 2. 3. List the 2 techniques paleontologists
More informationEvolution of Populations. Chapter 17
Evolution of Populations Chapter 17 17.1 Genes and Variation i. Introduction: Remember from previous units. Genes- Units of Heredity Variation- Genetic differences among individuals in a population. New
More informationMCDB 1111 corebio 2017 Midterm I
MCDB 1111 corebio 2017 Midterm I Name: There are 18 questions, each worth a maximum of 6 points. Multiple choice questions are worth 3 points, while explanations are worth 3 points. If you need to, use
More informationLecture Notes: BIOL2007 Molecular Evolution
Lecture Notes: BIOL2007 Molecular Evolution Kanchon Dasmahapatra (k.dasmahapatra@ucl.ac.uk) Introduction By now we all are familiar and understand, or think we understand, how evolution works on traits
More informationLearning objectives. Evolution in Action. Chapter 8: Evolution and Natural Selection. By the end of today s topic students should be able to:
ANNOUNCEMENTS Thursday February 13, 2014 Chapter 8: Evolution and Natural Selection Dr. Traver returns next week. Movie on Tuesday afternoon What Darwin Never Knew. Midterm 2 is next week 2/20/2014 Use
More informationFormalizing the gene centered view of evolution
Chapter 1 Formalizing the gene centered view of evolution Yaneer Bar-Yam and Hiroki Sayama New England Complex Systems Institute 24 Mt. Auburn St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA yaneer@necsi.org / sayama@necsi.org
More informationRisk of extinction and bottleneck effect in Penna model
Risk of extinction and bottleneck effect in Penna model K. Malarz Faculty of Physics & Applied Computer Science AGH University of Science & Technology Kraków, Poland ZIS, 2007/06/18 1 Introduction A species
More informationNatural Selection results in increase in one (or more) genotypes relative to other genotypes.
Natural Selection results in increase in one (or more) genotypes relative to other genotypes. Fitness - The fitness of a genotype is the average per capita lifetime contribution of individuals of that
More informationGeometric Semantic Genetic Programming (GSGP): theory-laden design of semantic mutation operators
Geometric Semantic Genetic Programming (GSGP): theory-laden design of semantic mutation operators Andrea Mambrini 1 University of Birmingham, Birmingham UK 6th June 2013 1 / 33 Andrea Mambrini GSGP: theory-laden
More informationEvolution & Natural Selection
Evolution & Natural Selection Learning Objectives Know what biological evolution is and understand the driving force behind biological evolution. know the major mechanisms that change allele frequencies
More informationExercise 3 Exploring Fitness and Population Change under Selection
Exercise 3 Exploring Fitness and Population Change under Selection Avidians descended from ancestors with different adaptations are competing in a selective environment. Can we predict how natural selection
More informationSection 15 3 Darwin Presents His Case
Section 15 3 Darwin Presents His Case (pages 378 386) Key Concepts How is natural variation used in artificial selection? How is natural selection related to a species fitness? What evidence of evolution
More informationNCEA Level 2 Biology (91157) 2017 page 1 of 5 Assessment Schedule 2017 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of genetic variation and change (91157)
NCEA Level 2 Biology (91157) 2017 page 1 of 5 Assessment Schedule 2017 Biology: Demonstrate understanding of genetic variation and change (91157) Evidence Statement Q1 Expected coverage Merit Excellence
More informationAPES C4L2 HOW DOES THE EARTH S LIFE CHANGE OVER TIME? Textbook pages 85 88
APES C4L2 HOW DOES THE EARTH S LIFE CHANGE OVER TIME? Textbook pages 85 88 Big Ideas Concept 4-2A The scientific theory of evolution explains how life on Earth changes over time through changes in the
More informationQ1) Explain how background selection and genetic hitchhiking could explain the positive correlation between genetic diversity and recombination rate.
OEB 242 Exam Practice Problems Answer Key Q1) Explain how background selection and genetic hitchhiking could explain the positive correlation between genetic diversity and recombination rate. First, recall
More informationCSC 4510 Machine Learning
10: Gene(c Algorithms CSC 4510 Machine Learning Dr. Mary Angela Papalaskari Department of CompuBng Sciences Villanova University Course website: www.csc.villanova.edu/~map/4510/ Slides of this presenta(on
More informationV. Evolutionary Computing. Read Flake, ch. 20. Assumptions. Genetic Algorithms. Fitness-Biased Selection. Outline of Simplified GA
Part 5A: Genetic Algorithms V. Evolutionary Computing A. Genetic Algorithms Read Flake, ch. 20 1 2 Genetic Algorithms Developed by John Holland in 60s Did not become popular until late 80s A simplified
More informationEnduring understanding 1.A: Change in the genetic makeup of a population over time is evolution.
The AP Biology course is designed to enable you to develop advanced inquiry and reasoning skills, such as designing a plan for collecting data, analyzing data, applying mathematical routines, and connecting
More informationBig Idea 1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life.
Big Idea 1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life. understanding 1.A: Change in the genetic makeup of a population over time is evolution. 1.A.1: Natural selection is a major
More informationChapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity. Sunday, October 1, 17
Chapter 5 Evolution of Biodiversity CHAPTER INTRO: The Dung of the Devil Read and Answer Questions Provided Module 14 The Biodiversity of Earth After reading this module you should be able to understand
More informationNOTES CH 17 Evolution of. Populations
NOTES CH 17 Evolution of Vocabulary Fitness Genetic Drift Punctuated Equilibrium Gene flow Adaptive radiation Divergent evolution Convergent evolution Gradualism Populations 17.1 Genes & Variation Darwin
More informationV. Evolutionary Computing. Read Flake, ch. 20. Genetic Algorithms. Part 5A: Genetic Algorithms 4/10/17. A. Genetic Algorithms
V. Evolutionary Computing A. Genetic Algorithms 4/10/17 1 Read Flake, ch. 20 4/10/17 2 Genetic Algorithms Developed by John Holland in 60s Did not become popular until late 80s A simplified model of genetics
More informationAP Curriculum Framework with Learning Objectives
Big Ideas Big Idea 1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life. AP Curriculum Framework with Learning Objectives Understanding 1.A: Change in the genetic makeup of a population over
More informationBig Idea #1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life
BIG IDEA! Big Idea #1: The process of evolution drives the diversity and unity of life Key Terms for this section: emigration phenotype adaptation evolution phylogenetic tree adaptive radiation fertility
More informationRepeated Occurrences of the Baldwin Effect Can Guide Evolution on Rugged Fitness Landscapes
Repeated Occurrences of the Baldwin Effect Can Guide Evolution on Rugged Fitness Landscapes Reiji Suzuki and Takaya Arita Graduate School of Information Science, Nagoya University Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku,
More informationEvolving more efficient digital circuits by allowing circuit layout evolution and multi-objective fitness
Evolving more efficient digital circuits by allowing circuit layout evolution and multi-objective fitness Tatiana Kalganova Julian Miller School of Computing School of Computing Napier University Napier
More informationIV. Evolutionary Computing. Read Flake, ch. 20. Assumptions. Genetic Algorithms. Fitness-Biased Selection. Outline of Simplified GA
IV. Evolutionary Computing A. Genetic Algorithms Read Flake, ch. 20 2014/2/26 1 2014/2/26 2 Genetic Algorithms Developed by John Holland in 60s Did not become popular until late 80s A simplified model
More informationMechanisms of Evolution
Mechanisms of Evolution 36-149 The Tree of Life Christopher R. Genovese Department of Statistics 132H Baker Hall x8-7836 http://www.stat.cmu.edu/ ~ genovese/. Plan 1. Two More Generations 2. The Hardy-Weinberg
More informationEvolutionary Design I
Evolutionary Design I Jason Noble jasonn@comp.leeds.ac.uk Biosystems group, School of Computing Evolutionary Design I p.1/29 This lecture Harnessing evolution in a computer program How to construct a genetic
More informationThese are my slides and notes introducing the Red Queen Game to the National Association of Biology Teachers meeting in Denver in 2016.
These are my slides and notes introducing the Red Queen Game to the National Association of Biology Teachers meeting in Denver in 2016. Thank you SSE and the Huxley Award for sending me to NABT 2016! I
More informationPopulation Genetics: a tutorial
: a tutorial Institute for Science and Technology Austria ThRaSh 2014 provides the basic mathematical foundation of evolutionary theory allows a better understanding of experiments allows the development
More information1. Natural selection can only occur if there is variation among members of the same species. WHY?
1. Natural selection can only occur if there is variation among members of the same species. WHY? Variation in a population results from mutation and the recombination of alleles during meiosis and fertilization.
More informationMaintenance of Species Diversity by Predation in the Tierra System
Maintenance of Species Diversity by Predation in the Tierra System Jie Shao and Thomas S. Ray Department of Zoology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 7319, USA jshao@ou.edu Abstract One of the
More information9 Genetic diversity and adaptation Support. AQA Biology. Genetic diversity and adaptation. Specification reference. Learning objectives.
Genetic diversity and adaptation Specification reference 3.4.3 3.4.4 Learning objectives After completing this worksheet you should be able to: understand how meiosis produces haploid gametes know how
More informationQuantitative Genetics & Evolutionary Genetics
Quantitative Genetics & Evolutionary Genetics (CHAPTER 24 & 26- Brooker Text) May 14, 2007 BIO 184 Dr. Tom Peavy Quantitative genetics (the study of traits that can be described numerically) is important
More informationDarwinian Selection. Chapter 7 Selection I 12/5/14. v evolution vs. natural selection? v evolution. v natural selection
Chapter 7 Selection I Selection in Haploids Selection in Diploids Mutation-Selection Balance Darwinian Selection v evolution vs. natural selection? v evolution ² descent with modification ² change in allele
More informationPopulation Genetics I. Bio
Population Genetics I. Bio5488-2018 Don Conrad dconrad@genetics.wustl.edu Why study population genetics? Functional Inference Demographic inference: History of mankind is written in our DNA. We can learn
More informationMechanisms of Evolution Microevolution. Key Concepts. Population Genetics
Mechanisms of Evolution Microevolution Population Genetics Key Concepts 23.1: Population genetics provides a foundation for studying evolution 23.2: Mutation and sexual recombination produce the variation
More informationMicroevolution 2 mutation & migration
Microevolution 2 mutation & migration Assumptions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium 1. Mating is random 2. Population size is infinite (i.e., no genetic drift) 3. No migration 4. No mutation 5. No selection
More informationURN MODELS: the Ewens Sampling Lemma
Department of Computer Science Brown University, Providence sorin@cs.brown.edu October 3, 2014 1 2 3 4 Mutation Mutation: typical values for parameters Equilibrium Probability of fixation 5 6 Ewens Sampling
More informationNeutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Kimura Nature (968) 7:64-66 King and Jukes Science (969) 64:788-798 (Non-Darwinian Evolution) Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Describes the source of variation
More informationGenetic assimilation can occur in the absence of selection for the assimilating phenotype, suggesting a role for the canalization heuristic
doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00739.x Genetic assimilation can occur in the absence of selection for the assimilating phenotype, suggesting a role for the canalization heuristic J. MASEL Department of
More informationEvolution Module. 6.2 Selection (Revised) Bob Gardner and Lev Yampolski
Evolution Module 6.2 Selection (Revised) Bob Gardner and Lev Yampolski Integrative Biology and Statistics (BIOL 1810) Fall 2007 1 FITNESS VALUES Note. We start our quantitative exploration of selection
More informationDarwin s Observations & Conclusions The Struggle for Existence
Darwin s Observations & Conclusions The Struggle for Existence 1 Voyage of the Beagle During His Travels, Darwin Made Numerous Observations And Collected Evidence That Led Him To Propose A Revolutionary
More information0 o 1 i B C D 0/1 0/ /1
A Comparison of Dominance Mechanisms and Simple Mutation on Non-Stationary Problems Jonathan Lewis,? Emma Hart, Graeme Ritchie Department of Articial Intelligence, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH
More informationUNIT V. Chapter 11 Evolution of Populations. Pre-AP Biology
UNIT V Chapter 11 Evolution of Populations UNIT 4: EVOLUTION Chapter 11: The Evolution of Populations I. Genetic Variation Within Populations (11.1) A. Genetic variation in a population increases the chance
More informationIt all depends on barriers that prevent members of two species from producing viable, fertile hybrids.
Name: Date: Theory of Evolution Evolution: Change in a over a period of time Explains the great of organisms Major points of Origin of Species Descent with Modification o All organisms are related through
More informationChapter 7. Evolutionary Game Theory
From the book Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. By David Easley and Jon Kleinberg. Cambridge University Press, 2010. Complete preprint on-line at http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/networks-book/
More informationSupplementary Figures.
Supplementary Figures. Supplementary Figure 1 The extended compartment model. Sub-compartment C (blue) and 1-C (yellow) represent the fractions of allele carriers and non-carriers in the focal patch, respectively,
More informationIntroduction to population genetics & evolution
Introduction to population genetics & evolution Course Organization Exam dates: Feb 19 March 1st Has everybody registered? Did you get the email with the exam schedule Summer seminar: Hot topics in Bioinformatics
More informationFebuary 1 st, 2010 Bioe 109 Winter 2010 Lecture 11 Molecular evolution. Classical vs. balanced views of genome structure
Febuary 1 st, 2010 Bioe 109 Winter 2010 Lecture 11 Molecular evolution Classical vs. balanced views of genome structure - the proposal of the neutral theory by Kimura in 1968 led to the so-called neutralist-selectionist
More informationBIOL 1010 Introduction to Biology: The Evolution and Diversity of Life. Spring 2011 Sections A & B
BIOL 1010 Introduction to Biology: The Evolution and Diversity of Life. Spring 2011 Sections A & B Steve Thompson: stthompson@valdosta.edu http://www.bioinfo4u.net 1 Natural Selection and Variation through
More information(Write your name on every page. One point will be deducted for every page without your name!)
POPULATION GENETICS AND MICROEVOLUTIONARY THEORY FINAL EXAMINATION (Write your name on every page. One point will be deducted for every page without your name!) 1. Briefly define (5 points each): a) Average
More informationChapter 7. Evolutionary Game Theory
Chapter 7 Evolutionary Game Theory In Chapter 6, we developed the basic ideas of game theory, in which individual players make decisions, and the payoff to each player depends on the decisions made by
More informationApplication Evolution: Part 1.1 Basics of Coevolution Dynamics
Application Evolution: Part 1.1 Basics of Coevolution Dynamics S. chilense S. peruvianum Summer Semester 2013 Prof Aurélien Tellier FG Populationsgenetik Color code Color code: Red = Important result or
More informationStudy of similarities and differences in body plans of major groups Puzzling patterns:
Processes of Evolution Evolutionary Theories Widely used to interpret the past and present, and even to predict the future Reveal connections between the geological record, fossil record, and organismal
More informationHaploid-Diploid Algorithms
Haploid-Diploid Algorithms Larry Bull Department of Computer Science & Creative Technologies University of the West of England Bristol BS16 1QY, U.K. +44 (0)117 3283161 Larry.Bull@uwe.ac.uk LETTER Abstract
More informationComputational Aspects of Aggregation in Biological Systems
Computational Aspects of Aggregation in Biological Systems Vladik Kreinovich and Max Shpak University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA vladik@utep.edu, mshpak@utep.edu Summary. Many biologically
More information